Ts 129010v090300p

ETSI TS 129 010 V9.3.
0 (2011-06)
Technical Specification
Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+);

Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS);
LTE;
Information element mapping between Mobile Station
- Base Station System (MS - BSS) and Base Station System -
Mobile-services Switching Centre (BSS - MSC);
Signalling Procedures and the Mobile Application Part (MAP)
(3GPP TS 29.010 version 9.3.0 Release 9)
3GPP TS 29.010 version 9.3.0 Release 9 1 ETSI TS 129 010 V9.3.0 (2011-06)
Reference
RTS/TSGC-0429010v930
Keywords
GSM, LTE, UMTS
ETSI
650 Route des Lucioles

F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C

Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la
Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88
Important notice
Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from:

http://www.etsi.org
The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or
perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF).
In case of dispute, the reference shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive
within ETSI Secretariat.
Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status.
Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at
http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp
If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services:
http://portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI_support.asp
Copyright Notification
No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.

The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2011.

All rights reserved.
TM TM TM TM
DECT , PLUGTESTS , UMTS , TIPHON , the TIPHON logo and the ETSI logo are Trade Marks of ETSI registered
for the benefit of its Members.
TM
3GPP is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners.
LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI currently being registered
for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners.
GSM® and the GSM logo are Trade Marks registered and owned by the GSM Association.
ETSI
Intellectual Property Rights

IPRs essential or potentially essential to the present document may have been declared to ETSI. The information
pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is publicly available for ETSI members and non-members, and can be found
in ETSI SR 000 314: "Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentially Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in
respect of ETSI standards", which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the ETSI Web
server (http://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp).
Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No guarantee
can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web
server) which are, or may be, or may become, essential to the present document.
Foreword
This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by ETSI 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
The present document may refer to technical specifications or reports using their 3GPP identities, UMTS identities or
GSM identities. These should be interpreted as being references to the corresponding ETSI deliverables.
The cross reference between GSM, UMTS, 3GPP and ETSI identities can be found under
http://webapp.etsi.org/key/queryform.asp.
ETSI
Contents
Intellectual Property Rights ................................................................................................................................2
Foreword.............................................................................................................................................................2
Foreword.............................................................................................................................................................6
1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................................7
1.1 References .......................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.2 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................... 8
1.3 Definitions .......................................................................................................................................................... 8
2 Classification of interworking cases.........................................................................................................9
2.1 Transparent procedures ...................................................................................................................................... 9
2.2 Non-transparent procedures................................................................................................................................ 9
3 Interworking in the MSC, Transparent case .............................................................................................9
3.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 Routeing area updating ..................................................................................................................................... 12
3.3 Authentication .................................................................................................................................................. 13
3.4 Retrieval of the IMSI from the MS .................................................................................................................. 14
3.5 Reallocation of TMSI ....................................................................................................................................... 15
3.6 Retrieval of the IMEI from the MS .................................................................................................................. 15
3.7 Tracing subscriber activity ............................................................................................................................... 16
3.8 Location update ................................................................................................................................................ 17
4 Interworking in the MSC, Non-transparent cases ..................................................................................18
4.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................. 18
4.2 Outgoing call set-up (MS originating call) ....................................................................................................... 18
4.3 Incoming call set-up (MS terminating call) ...................................................................................................... 22
4.4 Cipher mode setting.......................................................................................................................................... 24
4.5 Inter-MSC Handover ........................................................................................................................................ 24
4.5.1 Basic Inter-MSC Handover ........................................................................................................................ 25
4.5.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A ..................................................................................... 30
4.5.3 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC ......................................................................................... 34
4.5.4 BSSAP Messages transfer on E-Interface ................................................................................................... 37
4.5.5 Processing in MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface ................................................................. 38
4.5.5.1 Encryption Information ......................................................................................................................... 39
4.5.5.2 Channel Type ........................................................................................................................................ 39
4.5.5.3 Classmark .............................................................................................................................................. 40
4.5.5.4 Downlink DTX-Flag ............................................................................................................................. 40
4.5.5.5 Priority .................................................................................................................................................. 41
4.5.5.6 MSC/BSC-Invoke Trace Information Elements ................................................................................... 41
4.5.5.7 LSA Identifier List ................................................................................................................................ 41
4.5.5.8 Selected UMTS Algorithm ................................................................................................................... 41
4.5.5.9 Allowed UMTS Algorithms .................................................................................................................. 41
4.5.5.10 BSSMAP Service Handover ................................................................................................................. 42
4.5.5.11 RANAP Service Handover ................................................................................................................... 42
4.5.5.12 SNA Access Information ...................................................................................................................... 42
4.5.5.13 UESBI ................................................................................................................................................... 43
4.5.5.14 Alternative Channel Type ..................................................................................................................... 43
4.5.5.15 Trace parameters ................................................................................................................................... 43
4.5.6 Overview of the Technical Specifications GSM interworking for the Inter-MSC Handover ..................... 43
4.6 Inter-MSC Handover (UMTS to GSM)............................................................................................................ 45
4.6.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover from 3G-MSC-B back to MSC-A ........................................................ 50
4.6.5 Processing in MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface ................................................................. 58
4.6.6 Cause Code Mapping .................................................................................................................................. 58
ETSI
4.7 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to UMTS)............................................................................................................ 60

4.7.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover from MSC-B back to 3G_MSC-A ........................................................ 66
4.7.4.1 Assignment............................................................................................................................................ 73
4.7.4.2 Cipher Mode Control ............................................................................................................................ 74
4.7.4.3 Location Reporting Control .................................................................................................................. 75
4.7.5 Processing in 3G_MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface........................................................... 75
4.7.5.2 Channel Type ........................................................................................................................................ 76
4.7.5.3 Classmark .............................................................................................................................................. 76
4.7.5.4 Priority .................................................................................................................................................. 76
4.7.5.5 MSC-Invoke Trace Information Elements ............................................................................................ 77
4.7.5.6 Selected UMTS Algorithm ................................................................................................................... 77
4.7.5.7 Allowed UMTS Algorithms .................................................................................................................. 77
4.7.5.10 GERAN Classmark ............................................................................................................................... 78
4.7.5.11 SNA Access Information ...................................................................................................................... 79
4.7.5.12 UESBI ................................................................................................................................................... 79
4.7.5.13 Alternative Channel Type ..................................................................................................................... 79
4.7.5.14 Trace parameters ................................................................................................................................... 79
4.7.6 Cause Code Mapping .................................................................................................................................. 80
4.8 Inter-MSC Relocation ...................................................................................................................................... 83
4.8.1 Basic Inter-MSC Relocation ....................................................................................................................... 83
4.8.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation back to 3G_MSC-A............................................................................. 88
4.8.3 Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation to third MSC........................................................................................ 92
4.8.4 RANAP Messages transfer on E-Interface ................................................................................................. 95
4.8.5 Processing in 3G_MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface........................................................... 96
4.8.5.1 Integrity Protection Information............................................................................................................ 96
4.8.5.3 RAB Parameters .................................................................................................................................... 97
4.8.5.4 Channel Type ........................................................................................................................................ 97
4.8.5.5 Selected GSM Algorithm ...................................................................................................................... 98
4.8.5.6 Allowed GSM Algorithms .................................................................................................................... 98
4.8.5.7 Chosen Channel .................................................................................................................................... 99
4.8.5.10 GERAN Classmark ............................................................................................................................... 99
4.8.5.11 SNA Access Information .................................................................................................................... 100
4.8.5.12 UESBI ................................................................................................................................................. 100
4.8.5.13 Alternative RAB Parameters Value .................................................................................................... 100
4.8.5.14 Trace parameters ................................................................................................................................. 100
4.8.6 Overview of the Technical Specifications 3GPP interworking for the Inter-MSC Relocation ................. 101
4.9 Location Services ........................................................................................................................................... 103
4.9.1 Completed Location Acquisition .............................................................................................................. 103
4.9.1.1 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to GSM) ................................................................................................. 103
4.9.1.2 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to UMTS) .............................................................................................. 104
4.9.1.3 Inter-MSC Handover (UMTS to GSM) .............................................................................................. 106
4.9.1.4 Inter-MSC SRNS Relocation ............................................................................................................. 107
4.9.2 Cause Code Mapping ................................................................................................................................ 110
4.9.2.3 Inter-MSC Handover (UMTS to GSM) ............................................................................................. 111
4.9.3 Aborted Location Acquisition................................................................................................................... 111
4.9.3.1 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to GSM) ................................................................................................ 111
4.9.4 Request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys: Successful Case ....................................................... 118
ETSI

4.9.4.2 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to UMTS) ............................................................................................. 119
4.9.4.4 Inter-MSC SRNS Relocation .............................................................................................................. 123
4.9.5 Request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys: Failure Case ............................................................. 127
4.9.6 Abort of Request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys:.................................................................... 132
4.9.6.4 Inter-MSC SRNS Relocation .............................................................................................................. 135
4.10 Single Radio Voice Call Continuity (SRVCC) .............................................................................................. 135
4.10.1 General...................................................................................................................................................... 135
4.10.2 SRVCC Handover from UTRAN (HSPA) to GERAN ............................................................................. 135
4.10.3 SRVCC Handover from UTRAN (HSPA) to UTRAN ............................................................................. 135
4.10.4 SRVCC Handover from E-UTRAN to GERAN ....................................................................................... 135
4.10.5 SRVCC Handover from E-UTRAN to UTRAN ....................................................................................... 135
5 Interworking in the MME.....................................................................................................................136
5.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................... 136
5.2 Void ................................................................................................................................................................ 136
5.3 Interworking between RANAP protocol messages and S1AP protocol messages ......................................... 136
5.4 Interworking between BSSGP protocol messages and S1AP protocol messages .......................................... 137
6 Interworking in the S4-SGSN ..............................................................................................................139
6.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................... 139
6.2 Interworking between RANAP protocol messages and S1AP protocol messages ......................................... 139
6.3 Interworking between BSSGP protocol messages and S1AP protocol messages .......................................... 140
6.4 Interworking between BSSGP protocol messages and RANAP protocol messages ...................................... 141
Annex A (informative): Change history .............................................................................................142

History ............................................................................................................................................................145
ETSI
Foreword
This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
The present document specifies Information element mapping between Mobile Station - Base Station System
(MS - BSS) and Base Station System - Mobile-services Switching Centre (BSS - MSC) Signalling procedures and the
Mobile Application Part (MAP) within the digital cellular telecommunications system.
The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal
TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an
identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
Version x.y.z
where:
x the first digit:
1 presented to TSG for information;
2 presented to TSG for approval;
3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections,
updates, etc.
z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
ETSI
1 Scope
The scope of the present document is:
i) to provide a detailed specification for the interworking between information elements contained in layer 3
messages sent on the MS-MSC interface (Call Control and Mobility Management parts of 3GPP TS 24.008 [4])
and parameters contained in MAP services sent over the MSC-VLR interface (3GPP TS 29.002 [9]) where the
MSC acts as a transparent relay of information;
ii) to provide a detailed specification for the interworking between information elements contained in BSSMAP
messages sent on the BSC-MSC interface (3GPP TS 48.008 [12]) and parameters contained in MAP services
sent over the MSC-VLR interface (3GPP TS 29.002 [9]) where the MSC acts as a transparent relay of
information;
iii) to provide a detailed specification for the interworking between information elements contained in BSSMAP
messages (3GPP TS 48.008 [12]) and RANAP ((3GPP TS 25.413 [7]);
iv) to provide a detailed specification for the interworking as in i) and ii) above when the MSC also processes the
information;
v) to provide a detailed specification for the interworking between information elements contained in layer 3
messages sent on the MS-SGSN interface (GPRS mobility part of 3GPP TS 24.008 [4]) and parameters
contained in MAP services sent over the SGSN-HLR interface (3GPP TS 29.002 [9]);
vi) to provide a detailed specification for the interworking between information elements contained in RANAP
messages sent on the SGSN-RNC interface (3GPP TS 25.413 [7]) and parameters contained in S1AP messages
sent on the MME-eNodeB interface (3GPP TS 36.413 [21]);
vii) to provide a detailed specification for the interworking of information elements contained in BSSMAP messages
(3GPP TS 48.008 [12]) or RANAP messages (3GPP TS 25.413 [7]) during SRVCC handovers.
Interworking for supplementary services is given in 3GPP TS 29.011 [11]. Interworking for the short message service is
given in 3GPP TS 23.040 [3] and 3GPP TS 24.011 [6]. Interworking between the call control signalling of 3GPP TS
24.008 [4] and the PSTN/ISDN is given in GSM 09.03 [13], 3GPP TS 29.007 [10] and 3GPP TS 49.008 [14].
Interworking between the 'A' and 'E' interfaces for inter-MSC handover signalling is given in 3GPP TS 29.007 [10] and
3GPP TS 49.008 [14].
1.1 References
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present
document.
• References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or
non-specific.
• For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
• For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including
a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same
Release as the present document.
[1] 3GPP TS 21.905: "3G Vocabulary".
[2] 3GPP TS 23.009: "Handover procedures".
[3] 3GPP TS 23.040: "Technical realization of the Short Message Service (SMS) Point to Point (PP)".
[4] 3GPP TS 24.008: "Mobile Radio Interface Layer 3 specification; Core Network Protocols-Stage
3".
[5] 3GPP TS 24.010: "Mobile radio interface layer 3 Supplementary services specification - General
aspects".
ETSI
[6] 3GPP TSº24.011: "Point-to-Point (PP) Short Message Service (SMS) support on mobile radio
interface".
[7] 3GPP TS 25.413: "Iu interface RANAP signalling".
[8] 3GPP TS 27.001: " General on Terminal Adaptation Functions (TAF) for Mobile Stations (MS)".
[9] 3GPP TS 29.002: "Mobile Application Part (MAP) specification".
[10] 3GPP TS 29.007: "General requirements on interworking between the Public Land Mobile
Network (PLMN) and the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) or Public Switched
Telephone Network (PSTN)".
[11] 3GPP TS 29.011: "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Signalling interworking
for supplementary services".
[12] 3GPP TS 48.008: " Mobile Switching Centre - Base Station System (MSC - BSS) interface Layer
3 specification".
[13] GSM 09.03: "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Signalling requirements on
interworking between the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) or Public Switched
Telephone Network (PSTN) and the Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN)".
[14] 3GPP TS 49.008: "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Application of the Base
Station System Application Part (BSSAP) on the E-interface".
[15] 3GPP TS 29.108: "Application of the Radio Access Network Application Part (RANAP) on the
E-interface"
[16] 3GPP TS 23.271: "Functional stage 2 description of LCS"
[17] 3GPP TS 43.051: "Technical Specification Group GSM/EDGE; Radio Access Network; Overall
description - Stage 2".
[18] 3GPP TS 23.012: "Location management procedures".
[19] Void.
[20] 3GPP TS 24.301: "Non-Access-Stratum (NAS) protocol for Evolved Packet System (EPS)".
[21] 3GPP TS 36.413: "Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network E-UTRAN); S1
Application Protocol (S1AP)".
[22] 3GPP TS 23.401: " General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) enhancements for Evolved Universal
Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) access ".
[23] 3GPP TS 29.060: "GPRS Tunnelling Protocol (GTP) across the Gn and Gp interface".
[24] 3GPP TS 48.018: " Base Station System (BSS) -Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN); BSS GPRS
Protocol (BSSGP)".
[25] 3GPP TS 29.280: "3GPP EPS Sv interface (MME to MSC) for SRVCC".
1.2 Abbreviations
Abbreviations used in the present document are listed in 3GPP TS 21.905.
1.3 Definitions
The following terms are used in this Technical Specification:
A/Gb mode: mode of operation of the MS when connected to the Core Network via GERAN and the A and/or Gb
interfaces. Throughout this specification the term GSM refers to GERAN A/Gb mode.
ETSI
Iu mode: mode of operation of the MS when connected to the Core Network via GERAN or UTRAN and the Iu
interface. Throughout this specification the term UMTS refers to UTRAN or GERAN Iu mode.
2 Classification of interworking cases
2.1 Transparent procedures

The following MSC procedures require transparent mapping of access protocol information elements into MAP
parameters and vice versa (see 3GPP TS 29.002 [9] for definitions and the use of the procedures):
- location update;
- forward new TMSI;
- provide IMSI;
- obtain IMEI;
- check IMEI;
- authenticate;
- trace subscriber activity.
2.2 Non-transparent procedures

Procedures in this class require processing in the MSC and information element mapping. These procedures include
those related to:
- outgoing call set-up;
- incoming call set-up;
- handover;
- cipher mode setting;
- location services.
3 Interworking in the MSC, Transparent case
3.1 General
When the MSC receives a forward message from the BSS (possibly forwarded transparently from the MS), it will
invoke the desired MAP service and establish a cross reference between the BSSAP procedure and the MAP procedure
in order to return the result of the operation to the BSS (which may forward it transparently to the MS. The cross
reference is deleted when the MSC terminates the MAP procedure.
Positive or negative results of the MAP procedure are returned in the appropriate BSSAP message.
The parameters of the forward BSSAP message are mapped by a one-to-one mapping into the parameters of the MAP
service. However, in some cases parameters received on the radio path may be suppressed at the MSC because they are
related to another protocol entity, e.g. information related to RR-management may be included in MM-management
messages. Similarly, parameters received in the (positive) MAP service response are mapped one-to-one into
parameters of the corresponding backward BSSAP message.
A negative outcome, as carried in various MAP services (MAP specific service response, MAP_U_ABORT,
MAP_P_ABORT, MAP_NOTICE and premature MAP_CLOSE, see 3GPP TS 29.002 [9] for definitions) is mapped
ETSI
into a cause value in the required backward BSSAP message. In this case several negative results of MAP may be
mapped into the same BSSAP cause value, i.e. without discrimination between these negative results.
NOTE: For O & M purposes, the MAP procedure entity in the MSC may require a more detailed overview of
negative results than the MS.
ETSI
These principles are illustrated in figure 1.

24.008 (48.008) MAP service
forward message request
------------> ----------->
+-----------+ +---------+
|information| |parameter|
| element | | |
+-----------+ one-to-one +---------+
+----->-------------------------------->----+
mapping
MAP service
positive ack response
<------------ <-----------
+-----------+ +---------+
|information| |parameter|
| element | | |
+-----------+ one-to-one +---------+
+-----<--------------------------------<----+
mapping
negative
negative cause response
<------------ <-----------
+-----------+ +---------+
| cause | | cause |
+-----------+ one-to-one or many-to-one +---------+
+-----<--------------------------------<----+
mapping
Figure 1: Illustration of mapping principles in the MSC
For each of the transparent operations listed in subclause 2.1, the following format is used to show the mapping.
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 or 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MS/BSS to MSC MSC to VLR |
message | message name MAP service request |
| information element 1 <---> parameter 1 |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MSC to MS/BSS VLR to MSC |
result | message name positive response |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| MSC to MS/BSS VLR to MSC |
result | message name negative response |
| cause 1 <---> cause 1 |
| cause 2 <---> cause 2 |
| cause 3 <---> MAP_U/P_ABORT |
| cause 3 <---> MAP_NOTICE |
| cause 3 <---> MAP_CLOSE |
--------┴-------------------------------------------------┴-----
Equivalent mapping principles apply for operations invoked by the VLR towards the BSS/MS. However, negative
results are generally not received from the BSS/MS but are generated in the MSC. Therefore, for such operations the
interworking for negative results is not normally shown.
ETSI
3.2 Routeing area updating

---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | GMM (ROUTEING AREA MAP_UPDATE_GPRS _ |
message | UPDATE REQUEST) LOCATION request |
| |
| MS classmark 1 - |
| MS classmark 4 - |
| GPRS Ciphering - |
| key seq number |
| Mobile station IMSI |
| identity |
| Old routeing area - |
| identification |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| GMM (ROUTEING AREA MAP_UPDATE_GPRS |
results | UPDATE ACCEPT) LOCATION response |
| |
| Routeing area - |
| identification |
| Mobile station - | 1
| identity |
| C Mobile station - | 2
| C Reject: IMSI unknown - | 3
| in HLR |
| C Reject: MSC temporarily - | 4
| not reacheable |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| GMM (ROUTEING AREA MAP_UPDATE_GPRS |
results | UPDATE REJECT) LOCATION response |
| |
| Network failure - | 5
| GPRS services Unknown HLR |
| not allowed in |
| this PLMN |
| GPRS services Unknown subscriber | 6
| not allowed (no GPRS subscription) |
| GPRS services and Unknown subscriber | 7
| non GPRS services (IMSI unknown) |
| not allowed |
| C GPRS services Unknown subscriber | 8
| not allowed (no GPRS subscription) |
| C GPRS services and Unknown subscriber | 9
| non-GPRS services (IMSI unknown) |
| not allowed |
| MS identity cannot - | 10
| be derived by |
| the network |
| Roaming not allowed: |
| GPRS services not PLMN not allowed |
│ allowed in this │
│ PLMN │
| LA not allowed - | 14
| Roaming not allowed - |
| in this LA |
| No Suitable cells in - | 11
| location area |
| GPRS services not Operator |
| allowed in this determined barring|
│ PLMN │
| GPRS services not - | 12
| allowed in this |
| PLMN |
| C GPRS services not - | 12
| allowed in this |
| PLMN |
| Additional roaming |
| not allowed: | 13
| No Suitable cells in Supported RAT Types|
| location area not allowed |
| Illegal MS - |
| Illegal ME - |
| Network failure System Failure |
| Network failure Unexpected data value|
| Network failure MAP_U/P_ABORT |
| Network failure MAP_NOTICE |
ETSI
| Network failure MAP_CLOSE |

--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: The mobile station identity is inserted by the SGSN if the SGSN wants to deallocate or re-allocate a P-
TMSI. If the SGSN wants to deallocate the P-TMSI it shall include the IMSI. If the SGSN wants to re-
allocate the P-TMSI it shall include the new P-TMSI. If a P-TMSI is included, the MS shall respond with
a ROUTEING AREA UPDATE COMPLETE message.
NOTE 2: The mobile station identity is inserted by the SGSN if it is received in a BSSAP+ LOCATION UPDATE
ACCEPT message from the VLR. If a TMSI is included, the MS shall respond with a ROUTEING
AREA UPDATE COMPLETE message. Only used in the Combined Routeing and Location Area
procedure.
NOTE 3: This reject cause is inserted on the positive response by the SGSN if the SGSN receives a BSSAP+
LOCATION UPDATE REJECT message from the VLR indicating in the reject cause IMSI unknown in
HLR. Only used in the Combined Routeing and Location Area procedure.
NOTE 4: This reject cause is inserted on the positive response by the SGSN if the SGSN does not receive any
response from the VLR to a previous BSSAP+ LOCATION UPDATE REQUEST message. Only used in
the Combined Routeing and Location Area procedure.
NOTE 5: The Unknown RA error is only generated as a result of incorrect information being inserted by the BSS.
NOTE 6: The HLR shall send Unknown subscriber with diagnostic value No GPRS subscription if the HLR
indicates that there is an error in the type of subscription (i.e. SGSN requests service for a non-GPRS only
subscriber). The HLR may also send this error in the MAP SEND AUTHENTICATION INFO
RESPONSE message.
NOTE 7: The HLR shall send Unknown subscriber with diagnostic value IMSI unknown if the HLR indicates that
the IMSI provided by the SGSN is unknown.
NOTE 8: The HLR shall send Unknown subscriber with diagnostic value No GPRS subscription if the HLR
indicates that there is an error in the type of subscription (i.e. SGSN requests service for a non-GPRS only
subscriber). Used in the Combined Routeing and Location Area procedure. The HLR may also send this
error in the MAP SEND AUTHENTICATION INFO RESPONSE message.
NOTE 9: This reject cause is inserted if the SGSN receives a MAP GPRS UPDATE LOCATION negative response
message indicating IMSI unknown. Used in the Combined Routeing and Location Area procedure.
NOTE 10: This reject cause is inserted if the SGSN does not receive any response from the old SGSN to a previous
SGSN CONTEXT REQUEST message.
NOTE 11: The "No Suitable cells in location area" error is generated when the MS has access to only part of the
PLMN e.g. due to Administrative Restriction of Subscribers' Access, but where there may also be
suitable location areas available. The MS retries on another location area. The recommended cause due to
Administrative Restriction of Subscriber"s Access is "No Suitable Cells in Location Area", but cause
"Roaming Not Allowed in this LA" may also be used, based on operator configuration.
NOTE 12: This reject cause is inserted if the SGSN receives in MAP INSERT SUBSCRIBER DATA message an
indication of Roaming restricted in SGSN due to unsupported feature.
NOTE 13: Other reject causes than "no Suitable cells in location area" can be used (e.g. "Roaming not allowed in
this location area").
NOTE 14: The cause "LA not allowed" shall be sent only if the HLR indicates that due to subscription to a
"regionally restricted service" the MS is not allowed to operate in the location area.
3.3 Authentication
The message flow for the authentication procedure is shown in figure 2.
ETSI
MS MSC VLR
MAP_AUTHENTICATE request
AUTHENTICATION REQUEST <----------------------------------
<-----------------------
AUTHENTICATION RESPONSE
-----------------------> MAP_AUTHENTICATE response
---------------------------------->
or
MAP_U/P_ABORT
---------------------------------->
Figure 2: Authentication operation
The MSC can only act on a MAP_AUTHENTICATE request if an RR connection exists with the MS. If such a
connection does not exist, the MSC shall terminate the MAP procedure with a MAP_U_ABORT. The same applies if
the MS does not respond to an AUTHENTICATION REQUEST message.
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | AUTHENTICATION REQUEST MAP_AUTHENTICATE |
message | request |
| |
| RAND RAND |
| |
| Ciphering key seq CKSN |
| number |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Backward| AUTHENTICATION REQUEST MAP_AUTHENTICATE |
result | response |
| |
| SRES SRES |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
If the SRES parameter does not match the value stored in the VLR, then the ongoing MAP procedure shall be
terminated with a cause 'illegal subscriber'. This shall cause the MSC to send an AUTHENTICATION REJECT
message.
3.4 Retrieval of the IMSI from the MS

The VLR may request open identification of an MS with a MAP_PROVIDE_IMSI request.
The mapping of information elements is as follows:

---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | IDENTITY REQUEST MAP_PROVIDE_IMSI |
message | request |
| Identity type |
| set to: IMSI | 1
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Backward| IDENTITY RESPONSE MAP_PROVIDE_IMSI |
result | Mobile Identity (IMSI) response |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: The INVOKE does not carry any parameters. The identity type is inferred from the invoke name.
The MSC shall return a MAP_PROVIDE_IMSI response with user error "absent subscriber" if:
- there is no RR connection with the MS when the MAP service request is received;
- there is no response from the MS.
ETSI
3.5 Reallocation of TMSI

This operation is invoked by the VLR. The MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI request contains the new TMSI which is
forwarded to the MS in the TMSI REALLOCATION COMMAND. When the MS acknowledges the receipt of the new
TMSI, the MSC will return a MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI response to the VLR.
If there is no radio connection to the MS when the MSC receives the MAP service request, the MSC shall ignore the
message.
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | TMSI REALLOCATION MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI |
message | COMMAND request |
| |
| Mobile identity TMSI |
| |
| Location area |
| identification - |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Backward| TMSI REALLOCATION MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI |
result | COMPLETE response |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
3.6 Retrieval of the IMEI from the MS

The VLR may use the MAP_OBTAIN_IMEI service to request the MS to supply its IMEI , or may use the
MAP_CHECK_IMEI service to request the MSC to check the MS's IMEI. For either MAP service the BSSAP
signalling is the same.
The mapping of information elements is as follows:

---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | (MAP_CHECK_IMEI request |
message | IDENTITY REQUEST ( or |
| (MAP_OBTAIN_IMEI request |
| Identity type |
| set to: IMEI | 1
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Backward| (MAP_CHECK_IMEI response |
result | IDENTITY RESPONSE ( or |
| (MAP_OBTAIN_IMEI response |
| |
| Mobile Identity IMEI | 2
| (IMEI) |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: The MAP service request does not carry any parameters. The identity type is inferred from the service
name.
NOTE 2: If the MAP_CHECK_IMEI service was used, the MSC also returns the equipment status to the VLR in
the MAP_CHECK_IMEI response, after a successful dialogue with the EIR using the IMEI received from
the MS.
The MSC shall terminate the MAP dialogue with the VLR using a MAP_U_ABORT if:
- there is no RR connection with the MS when the MAP service request is received;
- there is no response from the MS.
NOTE: The MSC can also obtain the IMEI from a phase 2 MS by including appropriate information in the
BSSMAP Cipher Mode Command.
ETSI
3.7 Tracing subscriber activity

The VLR may request the MSC and/or BSS to record data about the current transaction with an MS.
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MSC INVOKE TRACE MAP_TRACE_SUBSCRIBER_ |
message | ACTIVITY request |
| |
| Trace type Trace type |
| TriggerId - |
| Trace reference Trace reference |
| TransactionId - |
| Mobile identity(IMSI) IMSI | 1
| Mobile identity(IMEI) IMEI | 1
| OMCId OMCId |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Backward| none none |
result | |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: The VLR may provide either an IMSI or IMEI, but not both.
ETSI
3.8 Location update

---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MM (LOCATION UPDATING MAP_UPDATE_LOCATION_ |
message | REQUEST) request |
| |
| Location area id - |
| Mobile identity IMSI |
| Mobile station |
| classmark 1 - |
| Mobile station |
| classmark 2 - |
| Ciphering key - |
| seq number |
| Location update - |
| type |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MM (LOCATION MAP_UPDATE_LOCATION |
results | UPDATING ACCEPT) response |
| |
| Location area identity - |
| Mobile identity - |
| Follow on proceed - |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| MM (LOCATION MAP_UPDATE_LOCATION |
results | UPDATING REJECT) response |
| |
| IMSI unknown in HLR Unknown subscriber | 1
| Roaming not allowed: |
| PLMN not allowed PLMN not allowed |
| LA not allowed - | 3
| Roaming not - |
| allowed in this LA |
| No Suitable cells in - |
| location area |
| PLMN not allowed Operator |
| determined barring|
| Additional roaming |
| not allowed: |
| No Suitable cells in Supported RAT Types| 2
| location area not allowed |
| Illegal MS - |
| Illegal ME - |
| Network failure System Failure |
| Network failure Unexpected data value|
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1 The HLR shall also send this error if there is an error in the type of subscription (i.e. VLR requests
service for a GPRS only subscriber).
NOTE 2: Other reject causes than "no Suitable cells in location area" can be used (e.g. "Roaming not allowed in
this location area").
NOTE 3 The VLR shall return the cause "LA not allowed" only if the HLR indicates that due to subscription to a
"regionally restricted service" the MS is not allowed to operate in the location area.
If the VLR finds out that the access is denied due to Administrative Restriction of Subscribers" Access based on
subscription info received from HLR, VLR will send negative response to the MSC. The MSC will map the received
cause using following mapping table:
ETSI
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| MM (LOCATION UPDATE_LOCATION | 1
results | UPDATING REJECT) AREA response |
| |
| PLMN not allowed PLMN not allowed |
| Roaming not National Roaming |
| allowed in this LA not allowed |
| No Suitable cells in RAT not allowed |
| location area |
NOTE 1 The UPDATE LOCATION AREA response refers to the internal interface used between VLR and MSC
(see 3GPP TS 23.012 [18]).
4 Interworking in the MSC, Non-transparent cases
4.1 General
For interworking other than the mapping of information fields, see 3GPP TS 49.008 [14].
4.2 Outgoing call set-up (MS originating call)

Figure 3 shows those elements of a call set-up sequence which require interworking between BSSAP and MAP. BSSAP
messages which do not require interworking with MAP are not shown.
ETSI
MS MSC VLR
CM SERVICE REQUEST
-----------------------> MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST request
---------------------------------->
+--------------------------+
| Possibly |
| identification procedure/|
| authentication procedure |
+--------------------------+
MAP_SET_CIPHERING_MODE request
<----------------------------------
(Note 1)
MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST response
CM SERVICE ACCEPT <---------------------------------
<----------------------- positive result (Note 1)
(Note 2)
CIPHER MODE COMMAND
<-----------------------
(Note 2)
CIPHER MODE COMPLETE
----------------------->
MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI request
TMSI REALLOCATION COMMAND <----------------------------------
<----------------------- (Note 3)
TMSI REALLOCATION COMPLETE
-----------------------> MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI response
---------------------------------->
CM SERVICE REJECT <---------------------------------
<----------------------- negative result, MAP_U/P_ABORT,
(Note 4) MAP_NOTICE, MAP_CLOSE
SETUP (Note 5)
-----------------------> MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING_CALL
---------------------------------->
request
MAP_COMPLETE_CALL request
CALL PROCEEDING <----------------------------------
<-----------------------
MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING_CALL
RELEASE COMPLETE <----------------------------------
<----------------------- response, MAP_U/P_ABORT,
(Note 6) MAP_NOTICE, MAP_CLOSE
Figure 3: Part of outgoing call set-up sequence
NOTE 1: If the MSC received a MAP_SET_CIPHERING_MODE request, it stores it until it receives the
MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ REQUEST response.
NOTE 2: CM SERVICE ACCEPT is sent only if the ciphering procedure is not invoked.
NOTE 3: TMSI reallocation need not be sequenced with other messages, but should be sent after ciphering.
NOTE 4: CM SERVICE REJECT is sent as a result of a user error parameter in the

MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST response, or termination of the MAP dialogue.
NOTE 5: The SETUP message is sent after the MS has either received a CM SERVICE ACCEPT or sent a
CIPHER MODE COMPLETE.
NOTE 6: RELEASE COMPLETE is sent as a result of a user error parameter in the

MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING_CALL response, or termination of the MAP dialogue.
The procedure can be considered in two parts: the handling of the CM SERVICE REQUEST and the handling of the
SETUP request.
The procedure is initiated by the MS sending a CM SERVICE REQUEST message. The MSC will forward the service
request to the VLR in the MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST request. The VLR may then invoke other operations,
e.g. authentication and identification. These operations are defined in subclauses 3.4 and 3.5.
ETSI
If there is a positive outcome for the CM SERVICE REQUEST procedure, the VLR always sends a
MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST response. If the request is for a first MM-connection and ciphering is required,
the MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST response is preceded by a MAP_SET_CIPHERING_MODE request. In
this case the MSC sends a CIPHER MODE COMMAND towards the MS. The interworking for cipher mode setting is
described in subclause 4.4. If the request is for an additional MM-connection or for a first MM-connection where
ciphering is not required, then the positive MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ REQUEST response causes the MSC to send a
CM SERVICE ACCEPT message to the MS. After cipher mode setting has been completed or the CM SERVICE
ACCEPT message has been returned, the MS will send the SETUP (or EMERGENCY SETUP) message and
information retrieval takes place as shown.
A negative outcome for the MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST procedure can be signalled by a

MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST response containing a user error parameter, or by terminating the MAP
dialogue between the MSC and the VLR.
A positive outcome for the call setup procedure is indicated by a MAP_COMPLETE_CALL request from the VLR to
the MSC, which causes the MSC to send a CALL PROCEEDING message towards the MS.
A negative outcome for the call setup procedure can be signalled by a MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_INCOMING_CALL
response or by terminating the dialogue between the MSC and the VLR.
Information element mapping is required between the messages:
- CM SERVICE REQUEST to MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST request;
- SETUP to MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING CALL request;
- MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING_CALL response, MAP_U/P_ABORT, MAP_NOTICE or premature

MAP_CLOSE to RELEASE COMPLETE or CM SERVICE REJECT.
The information contained in the MAP_COMPLETE_CALL request is not transmitted on the radio interface but is used
in the MSC for connecting the call.
The conversion of information elements is as follows:
ETSI
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008/24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | COMPLETE LAYER 3 INFO MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ |
| (CM SERVICE REQUEST) REQUEST request |
| |
| CM Service type CM Service type | 1
| Ciphering key CKSN |
| sequence number |
| Mobile identity TMSI or IMSI or IMEI |
| Mobile station |
| Classmark 2 - |
| |
| Cell identifier Current LA Id | 4
| Chosen channel - |
| - Access Connection |
| Status | 3
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| DTAP(CM SERVICE ACCEPT) MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ |
result | REQUEST response | 2
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| DTAP(CM SERVICE REJECT) MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ |
result | REQUEST response |
| |
| IMSI unknown in VLR Unidentified |
| Subscriber |
[ | Requested service ??????? |
| option not |
| subscribed |]
| Illegal ME Illegal equipment |
| Network failure System failure |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
| DTAP(AUTHENTICATION MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ |
| REJECT) REQUEST response |
| |
| Illegal subscriber |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: Indicates, in this case, a mobile originating call establishment or an emergency call establishment.
NOTE 2: The CM SERVICE ACCEPT is sent when the ciphering procedure is not invoked.
NOTE 3: Indicates whether or not an RR-connection exists and whether or not ciphering has been started.
NOTE 4: The Current LA Id parameter is derived by the MSC from the Cell identifier information element.
ETSI
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | SETUP MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_ |
message | OUTGOING_CALL request |
| |
| BC repeat indicator - |
| Bearer capability 1 - | 3
| Bearer capability 2 - | 3
| Calling party subaddress - |
| Called party BCD number Called Number |
| Called party subaddress - |
| LLC repeat indicator - |
| Low layer compatibility I - |
| Low layer compatibility II - |
| HLC repeat indicator - |
| High layer compatibility i - |
| High layer compatibility ii - |
| - Bearer service | 3
| - Teleservice | 3
| Facility - | 1
| - CUG index | 4
| - Suppress pref CUG | 4
| - Suppress CUG OA | 4
| User-user - |
| SS version - |
| CLIRO flag - |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | | 2
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| RELEASE COMPLETE MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_ |
result | OUTGOING_CALL response|
| |
| 3GPP TS 24.010 Call Barred |
| Barring Service |
| Active |
| Operator determined Call Barred |
| barring Operator Determined|
| Barring |
| Network out of order Data Missing |
| Network out of order Unexpected Data Value |
| Network out of order System Failure |
| Bearer capability Bearer service not |
| not authorized provisioned |
| Bearer capability Teleservice not |
| not authorized provisioned |
| [User not member of CUG] CUG reject |
| |
| Network out of order MAP_U/P_ABORT |
| Network out of order MAP_NOTICE |
| Network out of order MAP_CLOSE |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: If the Facility IE contains CUG information, the CUG information is transferred to the VLR in the
MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING_CALL service; any other information contained in a Facility IE
is transferred to the VLR in a MAP Supplementary Services related service.
NOTE 2: The call setup parameters retrieved from the VLR are not sent to the MS. The parameters are carried in
the MAP_COMPLETE_CALL service.
NOTE 3: The bearer capabilities can be used to derive the bearer/tele service.
NOTE 4: CUG information is derived from the contents of the Facility IE.
4.3 Incoming call set-up (MS terminating call)

Figure 4 shows those elements of the procedure which require interworking between MAP and 3GPP TS 24.008 [4]
procedures.
ETSI
MS MSC VLR
+--------------------------+
| Info retrieval |
+--------------------------+
MAP_PAGE request or
PAGE REQUEST <----------------------------------
<----------------------- MAP_SEARCH_FOR_MS request
(Note 1)
PAGING RESPONSE
-----------------------> MAP_SEARCH_FOR_MS response (Note 2)
---------------------------------->
MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST request
---------------------------------->
+--------------------------+
| Possibly |
| authentication procedure |
+--------------------------+
MAP_SET_CIPHERING_MODE request
<----------------------------------
(Note 3)
CIPHER MODE COMMAND <---------------------------------
<----------------------- positive result (Note 4)
(Note 3)
CIPHER MODE COMPLETE
----------------------->
MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI request
TMSI REALLOCATION COMMAND <----------------------------------
<----------------------- (Note 5)
TMSI REALLOCATION COMPLETE
-----------------------> MAP_FORWARD_NEW_TMSI response
---------------------------------->
MAP_COMPLETE_CALL request
SETUP <----------------------------------
<-----------------------
MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_INCOMING_CALL
RELEASE COMPLETE <---------------------------------
<----------------------- response negative result,
(Note 6) MAP_U/P_ABORT,MAP_NOTICE, MAP_CLOSE
Figure 4: Incoming call set-up
NOTE 1: If an MM connection already exists, the PAGE REQUEST is not sent. If the call can be accepted, the
MSC sends a MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST request in response to the MAP_PAGE request. If
the call cannot be accepted the MSC sends a MAP_PAGE response containing the error 'busy subscriber'.
NOTE 2: Sent only if MAP_SEARCH_FOR_MS was used.
NOTE 3: Needed only if a ciphered MM-connection does not exist already.
NOTE 4: If the MSC received a MAP_SET_CIPHERING_MODE request, it stores it until it receives the
MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ REQUEST response.
NOTE 5: TMSI reallocation need not be sequenced with other messages, but should be sent after ciphering.
NOTE 6: RELEASE COMPLETE is sent as a result of a user error parameter in the

MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING_CALL response, or termination of the MAP dialogue.
The paging procedure is controlled by the VLR. It may be followed by authentication (subclause 3.4), ciphering
(subclause 4.4) and reallocation of TMSI(subclause 3.6). The SETUP message is sent when the
MAP_COMPLETE_CALL request is received.
ETSI
Normally there is no interworking between the MAP_COMPLETE_CALL request and the SETUP message. However,
the MAP_COMPLETE_CALL request may contain a bearer service indication which will be used to establish the
bearer capabilities at the MSC. The interworking between the MAP_PAGE request or MAP_SEARCH_FOR_MS
request and the BSSMAP PAGING REQUEST message is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008/24.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | PAGING REQUEST MAP_PAGE request or |
message | MAP_SEARCH_FOR_MS request |
| |
| IMSI IMSI |
| TMSI TMSI | 1
| Cell identifier Stored LA Id |
| list |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Backward| COMPLETE LAYER 3 INFO MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_ |
message | (PAGING RESPONSE) REQUEST request |
| |
| - CM service type | 2
| Ciphering key CKSN |
| sequence number |
| Mobile identity TMSI or IMSI |
| Mobile station |
| classmark 2 - |
| Cell Identifier Current LA Id | 3
| - Access connection |
| status |
| Chosen channel - |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: If TMSI is included, the TMSI is used as the mobile identity in the 3GPP TS 24.008 [4] PAGE
REQUEST message, otherwise the IMSI is used as the mobile identity.
NOTE 2: In this case the MAP CM service type is set to 'mobile terminating call'.
NOTE 3: The Target LA Id parameter is derived by the MSC from the Cell identifier information element.
4.4 Cipher mode setting

The interworking is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | CIPHER MODE COMMAND MAP_SET_CIPHERING_MODE |
| request |
| |
| Cipher mode setting Ciphering mode |
| Encryption information Kc | 1
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| CIPHER MODE COMPLETE None |
result | |
--------┼------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| CIPHER MODE REJECT None |
result | |
--------┴------------------------------------------------┴-----
NOTE 1: The key Kc is passed through the BSS to the BTS, but is not passed to the MS.
4.5 Inter-MSC Handover

The general principles of the handover procedures are given in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]. 3GPP TS 29.010 gives the
necessary information for interworking between the 3GPP TS 48.008 [12] handover protocol and the 3GPP TS 29.002
[9] MAP protocol.
The following principle shall apply when new parameters need to be added for transfer on the E-interface:
ETSI
1. The parameters shall be added to be carried in the AN-APDU when they need to be forwarded to the target
radio access network and the encapsulated protocol is the same as the protocol used at the interface between the
target MSC and the target radio access network.
2. The parameters shall be added to be carried in a MAP message
- when they need to be forwarded to the target radio access network and the encapsulated protocol is different
from the protocol used at the interface between the target MSC and the target radio access network;
- when they are required by the target MSC, but not to be forwarded to the target radio access network; or
- when they are required by the target MSC for subsequent procedures
and they cannot be derived from the message encapsulated in the AN-APDU.
4.5.1 Basic Inter-MSC Handover

When a Mobile Station is handed over between two MSCs, the establishment of a connection between them
(described in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]) requires interworking between A-Interface and E-Interface.
The signalling at initiation, execution, completion of the Basic Inter-MSC handover procedure is shown in figures 5 to
10 with both possible positive or negative outcomes.
Additionally figures 5b and 5c show the possible interworking when trace related messages are transparently transferred
on the E-Interface at Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation.
BSS-A MSC-A MSC-B
| | |
|HANDOVER | |
|-------------->|MAP PREPARE HANDOVER |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| |request | |Possible Alloc. |
| | | |of a handover |
| | | |no. in the VLR-B|
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | |HANDOVER REQUEST |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 5a: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation (no trace related messages transferred)
BSS-A MSC-A MSC-B

|BSC INVOKE TRACE |
|-------------->| |
| | |
|HANDOVER | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| |request(*) | |Possible Alloc. |
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | |BSC INVOKE TRACE |
| | |---------------->(**)
Figure 5b: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation (BSC invoke trace message transferred)
(*): In that case, HANDOVER REQUEST and BSC INVOKE TRACE messages are included within the AN-
APDU parameter.
ETSI
(**): BSC INVOKE TRACE is forwarded to BSS-B if supported by MSC-B.
BSS-A MSC-A MSC-B

| (*) |
|HANDOVER | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| |request(**) | |Possible Alloc. |
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | |MSC INVOKE TRACE |
| | |--------------->(***)
Figure 5c: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation (MSC invoke trace message transferred)
(*): Tracing invocation has been received from VLR.
(**): In that case, HANDOVER REQUEST and MSC INVOKE TRACE messages are included within the
AN-APDU parameter.
(***): MSC INVOKE TRACE is forwarded to BSS-B if supported by MSC-B.
Possible Positive outcomes:
a) successful radio resources allocation and handover number allocation (if performed):
BSS-A MSC-A MSC-B BSS-B

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| | MAP PREPARE HANDOVER | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
|HANDOVER COMMAND | |
|<--------------| | |
b) radio resources allocation queued and successful handover number allocation (if performed). Later successful
radio resources allocation indication:

| | | |
| | |QUEUING INDICATION |
| | |<------------------|
| |MAP PREPARE HANDOVER | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |MAP PROCESS ACCESS | |
| |<------------------------| |
HANDOVER COMMAND| SIGNALLING request | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
Figure 6: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover execution (Positive outcomes)
Possible Negative outcomes:
ETSI
c) user error detected, or handover number allocation unsuccessful (if performed), or component rejection or
dialogue abortion performed by MSC-B:

| | | |
| |MAP PREPARE HANDOVER response |
| |negative result, MAP CLOSE |
| |<------------------------| |
| |MAP U/P-ABORT | |
|HANDOVER REQUIRED | |
|<--------------| | |
|REJECT (Note 1)| | |
| | | |
d) radio resources allocation failure:

| | | |
| | |HANDOVER FAILURE |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
e) radio resources allocation queued and successful handover number allocation (if performed). Later unsuccessful
radio resources allocation:

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | SIGNALLING request | |
|<--------------| | |
f) unsuccessful handover execution (Reversion to the old channel):

| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|-------------->| | |
|FAILURE | | |
| |MAP U -ABORT | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | |CLEAR COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
Figure 7: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover execution (Negative outcomes)
NOTE: Possible rejection of the handover because of the negative outcome of MAP or BSSMAP procedure.
ETSI

| | | |
| | |HANDOVER COMPLETE |
| | |<------------------|
| |MAP SEND END SIGNAL request |
| |<------------------------| |
|CLEAR sCOMMAND | | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
Figure 8: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover completion
Positive outcome
| | | |
| |MAP SEND END SIGNAL | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | response |CLEAR COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | | (Note 1) |
Figure 9: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover completion (Positive outcome)
Negative outcome
| | | |
| | MAP U/P -ABORT | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
Figure 10: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover completion (Negative outcome)
NOTE: From interworking between MAP and BSSMAP point of view.
The handover procedure is normally triggered by BSS-A by sending a HANDOVER REQUIRED message on
A-Interface to MSC-A. The invocation of the Basic Inter-MSC handover procedure is performed and controlled by
MSC-A. The sending of the MAP Prepare-Handover request to MSC-B is triggered in MSC-A upon receipt of the
HANDOVER REQUIRED message. For compatibility reason, the cell identity of the cell where the call is to be handed
over in MSC-B area, provided in the HANDOVER REQUIRED message, is mapped into targetCellId MAP parameter
and the HANDOVER REQUEST message is encapsulated in the AN-APDU MAP parameter of the Prepare-Handover
MAP request. MSC-B can invoke another operation towards the VLR-B (allocation of the handover number described
in 3GPP TS 29.002 [9]).
Additionally, if tracing activity has been invoked, the trace related messages can be transferred on the E-Interface
encapsulated in the AN-APDU MAP parameter of the Prepare-Handover Request. If transferred, one complete trace
related message at a time shall be included in the AN-APDU MAP parameter after the HANDOVER REQUEST
message.
The interworking between Prepare Handover and HANDOVER REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER REQUIRED MAP PREPARE HANDOVER request|
message | |
| -ho-NumberNotRequired| 1
| BSSMAP information -targetCellId |
| elements -AN-APDU( | 2
| HANDOVER REQUEST, |
| BSC INVOKE TRACE | 3
| or MSC INVOKE TRACE) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PREPARE HANDOVER response|
result | | 4
| -handover number |
| -AN-APDU( |
| QUEUING INDICATION |
| or HANDOVER REQUEST|
| ACKNOWLEDGE or |
| HANDOVER FAILURE) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT MAP PREPARE HANDOVER| 5
result | |
| equipment failure System Failure |
| equipment failure No Handover Number |
| available |
| equipment failure UnexpectedDataValue|
| equipment failure Data Missing |
| |
| equipment failure MAP CLOSE |
| equipment failure MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: The ho-NumberNotRequired parameter is included by MSC-A, when MSC-A decides not to use any
circuit connection with MSC-B. No handover number shall be present in the positive result. Any negative
response from MSC-B shall not be due to handover number allocation problem.
NOTE 2: The process performed on the BSSMAP information elements received in the HANDOVER REQUIRED
message is described in the GSM Recommendation 3GPP TS 48.008 [12].
NOTE 3: The process performed on the BSSMAP information elements received in the MSC or BSC INVOKE
TRACE message is described in subclause 4.5.6.6.
NOTE 4: The response to the Prepare-Handover request can include in its AN-APDU parameter, identifying the
GSM-08.06 protocol, either a BSSMAP QUEUING INDICATION, or a BSSMAP HANDOVER
REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE or a BSSMAP HANDOVER FAILURE.
In the first case, MSC-A shall wait for the radio resources allocation response from MSC-B, transmitted
to MSC-A as described in subclause 4.5.4.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in MSC-A the sending on A-Interface of the HANDOVER
COMMAND.
In the third case, the positive result triggers in MSC-A one of the following:
- another handover attempt is initiated by MSC-A;
- optionally the sending of the HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT.
(The possible sending of the HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT message upon receipt of the
HANDOVER FAILURE is out of the scope of 3GPP TS 29.010 and lies in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12]).
NOTE 5: The possible sending of the HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT message is described in 3GPP TS
48.008 [12].
The interworking between Send End Signal and HANDOVER COMPLETE in MSC-B is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL request |
message | |
| -AN-APDU( |
| HANDOVER COMPLETE)|
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| CLEAR COMMAND MAP SEND END SIGNAL response|
result | -Call Control release | 1
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| CLEAR COMMAND |
result | -Call Control release MAP CLOSE | 2
| -Call Control release MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: The positive empty result triggers the clearing of the Radio Resources on the A-Interface and the release
of the SCCP connection between MSC-B and BSS-B. If a circuit connection is used between MSC-A and
MSC-B, the 'Call Control release' clearing cause shall only be given to BSS-B when MSC-B has received
a clearing indication on its circuit connection with MSC-A.
NOTE 2: The abortion of the dialogue or the rejection of the component triggers in MSC-B the clearing of its
circuit connection with MSC-A, if any, of the Radio Resources on the A-Interface and the release of the
SCCP connection between MSC-B and BSS-B.
The interworking between Send End Signal and CLEAR COMMAND in MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP SEND END SIGNAL CLEAR COMMAND |
message | response |
| -AN-APDU( - Handover |
| HANDOVER COMPLETE) Successful |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
The interworking between HANDOVER FAILURE in case of reversion to old channel of the MS and User Abort in
MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER FAILURE MAP U -ABORT |
message | |
| - Reversion to old |
| channel |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
4.5.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A

When a Mobile Station is being handed over back to MSC-A, the procedure (described in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]) requires
interworking between A-Interface and E-Interface.
The signalling at initiation, execution and completion of the Subsequent Inter-MSC handover procedure is shown in
figures 11 to 15.
ETSI
BSS-A MSC-B MSC-A

| | |
|HANDOVER | |
|-------------->|MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>|
| |HANDOVER request |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 11: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A initiation
a) successful radio resources allocation:
BSS-A MSC-B MSC-A BSS-B

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| | MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | HANDOVER response | |
|<--------------| | |
b) radio resources allocation queued. Later successful radio resources allocation indication:

| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| | MAP FORWARD ACCESS | |
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 12: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A execution (Positive
outcome)
c) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by MSC-A:

| |MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER |
| |<------------------------| |
|HANDOVER REQUIRED response negative result |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
d) component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by MSC-A:
ETSI

| |MAP CLOSE, MAP U/P ABORT | |
| |<------------------------| |
|CLEAR COMMAND | | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
e) radio resources allocation failure:
| | | HANDOVER FAILURE |
| | |<------------------|
| |MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT | |
| |<------------------------| |
|HANDOVER REQUIRED HANDOVER response | |
|<--------------| | |
f) radio resources allocation queued. Later unsuccessful radio resources allocation:
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|HANDOVER REQUIRED SIGNALLING request | |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 13: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A execution
(Negative outcome)
NOTE 1: Possible rejection of the handover because of the negative outcome of MAP or BSSMAP procedure.
BSS-B MSC-A MSC-B BSS-A
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|-------------->|MAP SEND END SIGNAL | |
|COMPLETE |------------------------>| |
| | response | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 14: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A completion
(Successful completion of the procedure)
NOTE: Positive outcome case shown in figure 9.

BSS-B MSC-A MSC-B BSS-A
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|COMPLETE |------------------------>| |
| | response | |
| | | |
| |MAP U/P -ABORT | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | |------------------>|
| | |(Note 1) |
Figure 15: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A completion (Unsuccessful
completion of the procedure)
NOTE 1: Abnormal end of the procedure which triggers the clearing of all resources in MSC-B.
The interworking between Prepare Subsequent Handover and HANDOVER REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward |HANDOVER REQUIRED MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
message | request | 1
| |
| -target MSC number |
| BSSMAP information -targetCellId |
| elements -AN-APDU( |
| HANDOVER REQUEST) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive|HANDOVER REQUIRED MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
result | response | 2
| -AN-APDU( |
| ACKNOWLEDGE or |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT| 3
result | HANDOVER response |
| equipment failure Unknown MSC |
| equipment failure Subsequent Handover|
| Failure |
| |
| CLEAR COMMAND |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: The processing performed on the BSSMAP information elements received in the HANDOVER
REQUIRED message is out of the scope of the present document. The target MSC number is provided to
MSC-A by MSC-B based on the information received from BSS-B.
NOTE 2: The response to the Prepare-Subsequent-Handover request can include in its AN-APDU parameter,
identifying the GSM-0806 protocol, either a BSSMAP QUEUING INDICATION, or a BSSMAP
HANDOVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE or a BSSMAP HANDOVER FAILURE.
In the first case, MSC-B shall wait for the radio resources allocation response from MSC-A, transmitted
to MSC-B as described in subclause 4.5.4.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in MSC-B the sending on A-Interface of the HANDOVER
COMMAND.
In the third case, the positive result triggers in MSC-B one of the following:
- another handover attempt is initiated by MSC-B;
- optionally the sending of the HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT.
48.008 [12].
The interworking between Send End Signal Result and HANDOVER COMPLETE in MSC-A is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | MAP U/P -ABORT | 1
| |
NOTE 1: The abortion of the dialogue ends the handover procedure with MSC-B.
4.5.3 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC

When a Mobile Station is being handed over to a third MSC, the procedure (described in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]) does
require one specific interworking case in MSC-A (figure 20) between E-Interface from MSC-B and E-Interface from
MSC-B' other than the combination of the ones described in the subclause 4.5.1 and 4.5.2.
BSS-A MSC-B MSC-A MSC-B'
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|----------->|MAP PREPARE SUSEQUENT | |
|REQUIRED |--------------------->| |
| |HANDOVER request |MAP PREPARE |
| | |--------------->|
| | |HANDOVER request|
| | | |+-------+
| | | ||Possib.|
| | | ||Alloc. |
| | | ||of ho. |
| | | ||number |
| | | || VLR-B |
| | | |+-------+
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |-------->|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | |
Figure 16: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (MSC-B') initiation

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | ACKNOWLEDGE
| | | | |
| | |MAP PREPARE HANDOVER |
| | |<---------------| |
| |MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT| response | |
| |<---------------------| | |
| |HANDOVER response | | |
| HANDOVER | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
| | | | |
b) radio resources allocation queued and successful handover number allocation, if performed. Later successful
ETSI

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | | QUEUING |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |INDICAT. |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | ACKNOWLEDGE
| | | | |
| | |MAP PROCESS ACCESS |
| | |<---------------| |
| |MAP FORWARD ACCESS |SIGNALLING request |
| |<---------------------| | |
| |SIGNALLING request | | |
| HANDOVER | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
Figure 17: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (MSC-B') execution
(Positive outcome)
c) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by MSC-B':

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | |response negative result |
| | |MAP CLOSE | |
| | |<---------------| |
| | |MAP U/P -ABORT | |
| |MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT| | |
| |<---------------------| | |
| |HANDOVER response negative | |
| HANDOVER |result | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| REQUIRED | | | |
| REJECT | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |
ETSI

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |FAILURE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| HANDOVER | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| REQUIRED | | | |
| REJECT | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | | QUEUING |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |INDICAT. |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |FAILURE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| | |SIGNALLING request |
| |MAP FORWARD ACCESS | | |
| |<---------------------| | |
| HANDOVER | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| REQUIRED | | | |
| REJECT | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |
Figure 18: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (MSC-B') execution (Negative
outcome)
Positive outcome:
ETSI

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |COMPLETE |
| | | | |
| | |MAP SEND END SIGNAL |
| | |<---------------| |
| | MAP SEND END SIGNAL | | |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | response | | |
| CLEAR | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
Figure 19: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (MSC-B') completion
Negative outcome:
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | | BSS-B'
|----------->| | | |
|FAILURE |MAP PROCESS ACCESS | | |
| |--------------------->| | |
| |SIGNALLING request (Note 1) | |
| | | | |
| | |MAP U -ABORT | |
| | |--------------->| |
| | | |CLEAR |
| | | |-------->|
| | | |COMMAND |
| | | | |
(Unsuccessful completion of the procedure)
NOTE 1: Specific interworking case detailed below.
The specific interworking case in MSC-A compared to the subclauses 4.5.1 and 4.5.2 occurs between HANDOVER
FAILURE encapsulated in a Process Access Signalling from MSC-B and the abortion of the dialogue with MSC-B' in
the case of a reversion to old channel of the MS:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP PROCESS-SIGNALLING |
message | request |
| |
| -AN-APDU( MAP U -ABORT | 1
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| |
NOTE 1: The abortion of the dialogue triggers in MSC-B' the clearing of the circuit connection with MSC-A, if
any, and of the Resources between MSC-B' and BSS-B'.The abortion of the dialogue ends the handover
procedure with MSC-B'.
4.5.4 BSSAP Messages transfer on E-Interface

The following mapping applies to the encapsulation performed in MSC-A.
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008/48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | BSSAP messages MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIGNALLING|
| |
| -AN-APDU (BSSAP messages) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | | 2
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | MAP CLOSE |
| MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: Complete BSSAP messages to be sent on MSC-B - BSS-B interface (BSSMAP or DTAP messages) are
embedded into the AN-APDU parameter (see Annex A of 3GPP TS 48.008 [12] for the description of the
set of BSSMAP messages).
NOTE 2: The Return Result does not apply. If MSC-B returns a message, this message will arrive in an Invoke:
Process Access Signalling.
The following mapping applies to the encapsulation performed in MSC-B.

----------------------------------------------------------------
| 24.008/48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | BSSAP messages MAP PROCESS ACCESS SIGNALLING|
| |
| -AN-APDU (BSSAP messages)|
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | | 2
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| CLEAR COMMAND |
| |
| equipment failure MAP U/P -ABORT | 3
| |
NOTE 1: Complete BSSAP messages to be sent to MSC-A (BSSMAP or DTAP messages) are embedded into the
AN-APDU parameter (see 3GPP TS 49.008 [14] for the description of the set of BSSMAP messages).
NOTE 2: The Return Result does not apply. If MSC-A returns a message, this message will arrive in an Invoke:
Forward Access Signalling.
NOTE 3: The abortion of the dialogue triggers the clearing of the circuit connection with MSC-A, if any, of the
Radio Resources on the A-Interface and the release of the SCCP connection between MSC-B and BSS-B.
The clearing of the Radio Resources (the clearing indication received from BSS-B is transmitted to
MSC-A) or the loss of the SCCP connection between MSC-B and BSS-B, triggers in MSC-B the abortion
of the dialogue on the E-Interface and the clearing of the circuit connection with MSC-A, if any.
4.5.5 Processing in MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface

The following parameters require processing (e.g. to store the parameter, to internally generate the parameter) in
MSC-B. The relevant BSSMAP procedures are mentioned to ease the comprehension, their detailed description is the
scope of 3GPP TS 48.008 [12]. Each BSSMAP message listed in 3GPP TS 49.008 [14] being transferred on E-interface
shall use the mechanisms given in subclause 4.5.4 and is described in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12].
For intra-MSC-B handover/relocation and security interworking , after inter-MSC handover from GSM to GSM, the
3G_MSC-B needs additional information to be able to perform security mode and integrity protection procedures.
These RANAP informations are transferred between MSC-A and 3G-MSC-B in MAP messages, defined in 3GPP TS
29.002 [9].
For subsequent handover/relocation, after inter-MSC handover from GSM to GSM, the 3G_MSC-B needs additional
information to be able to perform service handover procedures. The relevant information is transferred between MSC-A
and 3G-MSC-B in MAP messages, defined in 3GPP TS 29.002 [9].
ETSI
For subsequent handover/relocation, after inter-MSC handover from GSM to GSM, the 3G_MSC-B needs additional
information to be able to forward access rights information in the context of Shared Network to the RAN. The relevant
information is transferred between MSC-A and 3G-MSC-B in MAP messages, defined in 3GPP TS 29.002 [9].
4.5.5.1 Encryption Information

A sequence of possible encryption algorithms can be sent to a BSS in Cipher Mode Command or Handover Request.
The BSS chooses one of the listed algorithms and reports this back to the MSC in Cipher Mode Complete or Handover
Request Acknowledge respectively.
The list of algorithms, the ciphering key and the chosen algorithm shall be stored by MSC-B, and the chosen value sent
to MSC-A.
Transfer of Information:
If ciphering has not been performed before Inter-MSC Handover, this will be controlled by MSC-A after the
completion of Inter-MSC Handover.
Ciphering control towards MSC-B:
If Ciphering has been performed before Inter-MSC Handover:
- in the Handover Request BSSMAP message (information included).
The Handover Request Acknowledge should in this case contain the indication of the chosen algorithm.
If Ciphering has NOT been performed before Inter-MSC Handover:
- in the Cipher Mode Command procedure between MSC-A and MSC-B.
If the encryption algorithm is changed at an intra-BSS handover in BSS-B this must be reported to MSC-A
in:
- the BSSMAP Handover Performed procedure.
If the encryption algorithm is changed at an intra-MSC handover in MSC-B this must be reported to MSC-A
in:
- the BSSMAP Handover Performed procedure which shall be initiated by MSC-B on reception from BSS-
B of the Handover Complete message (the information being previously received in the Handover
Request Acknowledge message).
Note also that the chosen encryption value may be contained in the BSSMAP Assignment Complete
message. This may happen if the encryption value changes e.g. at a second assignment during a call (e.g.
from TCH to SDCCH).
4.5.5.2 Channel Type

Assignment Request and Handover Request (BSSMAP) may give the BSS a choice, in the same way as the Encryption
Algorithm above. Depending on the Channel Type Info, the chosen channel may have impact on subsequent handovers,
internal in MSC-B and inter-MSC controlled by MSC-A. Some values in channel Type Info indicate that if a particular
channel once has been chosen, the same type must be used for the rest of the call.
The Channel Type, and the characteristics of the chosen channel shall be stored by MSC-B, and the Chosen Channel
and/or Speech Version information elements transferred to MSC-A.
Independently of the type of resource (Signalling only (e.g. SDCCH) or TCH) assigned to the MS, the Channel
Type Information is transferred to MSC-B in:
- the Handover Request BSSMAP message, and the Chosen Channel and/or Speech Version should be
reported back to MSC-A in the Handover Request Acknowledge.
If a new type of resource is to be assigned after Inter-MSC Handover, this can be made with:
ETSI
- the BSSMAP Assignment procedure between MSC-A and MSC-B (Chosen Channel and/or Speech Version
in Assignment Complete).
If the Channel Type (the chosen channel and/or chosen speech version) is changed at an intra-BSS handover in
BSS-B this must be reported to MSC-A in:
- the BSSMAP Handover Performed procedure.
If the Channel Type (the chosen channel or chosen speech version) is changed at an intra-MSC handover in
MSC-B this must be reported to MSC-A in:
- the BSSMAP Handover Performed procedure which shall be initiated by MSC-B on reception from BSS-B
of the Handover Complete message (the information being previously received in the Handover Request
Acknowledge message).
4.5.5.3 Classmark
This information shall be stored by MSC-B and might be received either from MSC-A, or from the MS when the MS
initiates a Classmark Update.
Transfer of Information due to Classmark received from MSC-A:
This information shall be stored by MSC-B and is received:
- in the Handover Request BSSMAP message.
If a new type of resource is to be assigned after Inter-MSC Handover, Classmark Information MAY be included:
- in the BSSMAP Assignment procedure.
Transfer of Information, due to "Classmark Signalling Procedures".
This information shall be stored by MSC-B and can be received:
- Due to a classmark update, either requested from MSC-A (Classmark Request, Classmark Update), or an
MS-Initiated Classmark Update.
This can be carried out either with:
- the BSSMAP Classmark procedure(s).
Apart from these cases there is the "odd" case where a Classmark Update can be received during an Inter-MSC
Handover by MSC-B, i.e. before the MS has moved to the new channel controlled by MSC-B. This can be made
with transparent transfer of BSSMAP Classmark Update.
4.5.5.4 Downlink DTX-Flag

The parameter shall be stored by MSC-B to be used at internal Handover in MSC-B.
Received by MSC-B from MSC-A in either:
If the MS has already been assigned to a TCH for speech before the Inter-MSC Handover, the DTX-flag
should be sent in:
- the Handover Request BSSMAP message;
(if the type of resource is not TCH for speech, the DTX-flag shall not be included).
If a new assignment to a TCH for speech after an Inter-MSC Handover is to be performed, this can be made
with:
- the BSSMAP Assignment procedure.
ETSI
4.5.5.5 Priority
The parameter shall be stored by MSC-B and is received according to below:
Received by MSC-B from MSC-A in:
- the Handover Request BSSMAP message.
If a change is needed after an Inter-MSC Handover with:
4.5.5.6 MSC/BSC-Invoke Trace Information Elements

The process to be performed by MSC-B on the information elements of the MSC or BSC Invoke Trace BSSMAP
messages is left for further study.
4.5.5.7 LSA Identifier List

The parameter shall be stored by MSC-B and is received according to below:
Received by MSC-B from MSC-A in:
- the LSA Information BSSMAP message.
4.5.5.8 Selected UMTS Algorithm

After inter-MSC handover, the 3G_MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. A sequence of possible
encryption and integrity protection algorithms, received from the 3G_MSC-A, can be sent to an RNS in Relocation
Request or in Security Mode Command in case of cipher mode setting after intra.MSC-B handover from GSM to
UMTS. The RNS chooses one of the listed algorithms and reports this back to the 3G_MSC in Relocation Request
Acknowledge or Security Mode Complete respectively. The MSC-B provides the Selected UMTS algorithm
information to the MSC-A. The Selected UMTS algorithms IE in the MAP Process Access Signalling Request message
refers to the Chosen Integrity Protection Algorithm and Chosen Encryption Algorithm, defined in RANAP
specification 3GPP TS 25.413 [7]
The selected algorithm shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B, and sent to 3G_MSC-A.
If ciphering has not been performed before Inter-MSC Handover, this will be controlled by 3G_MSC-A after the
completion of Inter-MSC Handover and possibly after intra-MSC-B handover from GSM to UMTS. In both
cases Selected UMTS algorithm information is received by 3G_MSC-A from 3G_MSC-B in:
− The Process Access Signalling Request MAP message.
4.5.5.9 Allowed UMTS Algorithms

In case of GSM-subscriber, the Integrity Protection Information and UMTS Encryption Information are not transferred
to the MSC-B during inter-MSC handover. Allowed UMTS algorithms is UMTS information that is required in
RANAP Relocation Request and RANAP Security Mode Command, and shall be provided by 3G_MSC-A. 3G_MSC-B
needs this information in case of an intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover and in subsequent security mode setting, after
an inter-MSC handover. Therefore 3G_MSC-A must provide this information in case of an inter-MSC GSM to GSM
handover. The Allowed UMTS algorithms IE in the MAP Prepare Handover and in the MAP Forward Access
Signalling Request messages refers to the Permitted Integrity Protection Algorithms in Integrity Protection
ETSI
Information and Permitted Encryption Algorithms in Encryption Information, defined in RANAP specification 3GPP
TS 25.413 [7].
Allowed UMTS algorithms shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B.
Transfer of information:
Ciphering control towards 3G_MSC-B:
− The Prepare Handover Request MAP message.
− The Forward Access Signalling Request MAP message.
4.5.5.10 BSSMAP Service Handover

This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and sent to a BSS in Handover Request, when 3G_MSC-B performs
handover to GSM.
The BSSMAP Service Handover information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
− the Handover Request BSSMAP message.
If a new assignment of a TCH after an inter-MSC handover is to be performed, the BSSMAP Service Handover
information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
− the BSSMAP Assignment procedure.
4.5.5.11 RANAP Service Handover

This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and sent to an RNS in Relocation Request, when 3G_MSC-B performs
relocation or handover to UMTS.
The RANAP Service Handover information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
− the Prepare Handover Request MAP message.
If a new assignment of a Radio Access Bearer after an inter-MSC handover is to be performed, the information
is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
− the Forward Access Signalling Request MAP message
and sent by 3G_MSC-B to the RNS in RAB Assignment Request.
4.5.5.12 SNA Access Information

This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and sent to an RNS in the Relocation Request message when 3G_MSC-
B performs handover to UMTS.
The SNA Access Information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
ETSI
4.5.5.13 UESBI
This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and sent to an RNS in Relocation Request, when 3G_MSC-B performs
relocation or handover to UMTS.
The UESBI information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
- the Prepare Handover Request MAP message.
4.5.5.14 Alternative Channel Type

This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and from this information 3G_MSC-B shall generate Alternative RAB
Parameters Value IE sent to an RNS in Relocation Request, when 3G_MSC-B performs relocation or handover to
UMTS.
The Alternative Channel Type information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
- the Forward Access Signalling Request MAP message.
4.5.5.15 Trace parameters

This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and 3G_MSC-B shall use this information for trace activation for MSC-
S, MGW, RNC or BSC.
The Trace Parameter List information for MSC-S, MGW and RNC tracing is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
The Trace Reference and Trace Type information for BSC tracing is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
- the MSC Invoke Trace BSSMAP message.
4.5.6 Overview of the Technical Specifications GSM interworking for the

Inter-MSC Handover
ETSI
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PSTN/ISDN ║
║ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ║
║ ▒ +---------------+ ▒ ║
║ ==============▒====== | ============= | =============== ▒ ║
║ PLMN ▒ | | ▒ ║
║ ▒ V V ▒ ║
║ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒ ║
║ ▒ BSS-A MSC-A MSC-B BSS-B ▒ MS ║
║ ▒ ▒ ║
║ ▒ +-------+ ▒ +-------+ ║
║ ▒ | C M | 24.008 (Note) ▒ | C M | ║
║ ▒ +-------|<------------------------------------>+-------| ║
║ ▒ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ | M M | ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒ | M M | ║
║ ▒ ░+------+48.008 +-------|48.008+-------+ 48.008 +-------+ ░▒ +-------| ║
║ ▒ ░| R R |<----->| R R |<=====>| R R |<----->| R R | ░▒ | R R | ║
║ ▒ ░+------+ +-------+ (Note)+-------+ +-------+ ░▒ +-------+ ║
║ ▒ ░ Λ Λ Λ Λ ░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░ | | 29.010 | | ░▒ Note: Subset of 48.008 ║
║ ▒ ░ | V V | ░▒ procedures as described ║
║ ▒ ░ |+-----+ 29.002+-----+| ░▒ in the TS 3GPP TS 48.008. ║
║ ▒ ░ ||MAP/E|<----->|MAP/E|| ░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░ |+-----+ +-----+| 23.009░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ | ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ | ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒ Remark: The A-bis interface and ║
║ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ V ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ V ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ the link layer ║
║ +-----------------------+ protocols being out of ║
║ | T C A P | the scope of this ║
║ +-----------------------+ Specification are not ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ shown here. ║
║ | S C C P | ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ ║
║ | M T P | ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETSI
4.6 Inter-MSC Handover (UMTS to GSM)

necessary information for interworking between the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7] RANAP protocol, GSM handover procedures
and the 3GPP TS 29.002 [9] MAP protocol. The RANAP protocol is used between the RNS and the 3G-MSC.
The following three principles apply for the Inter-MSC handover UMTS to GSM:
The BSSMAP parameters required for Inter-MSC handover UMTS to GSM are generated as in GSM.
Received BSSMAP parameters, e.g. cause code or Handover command, are mapped to the appropriate RANAP
parameters, e.g. cause code transparent container to source RNS.
When new parameters need to be added for transfer on the E-interface, the principles stated in the beginning of
subclause 4.5 shall be followed.

When a Mobile Station is handed over between two MSCs, the establishment of a connection between them (described
in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]) requires interworking between A-Interface and E-Interface.
The signalling at initiation, execution, completion of the Basic Inter-MSC handover procedure is shown in figures 21 to
26 with both possible positive or negative outcomes.
Additionally figure 21b shows the possible interworking when the trace related message is transparently transferred on
the E-Interface at Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation.
RNS-A 3G-MSC-A MSC-B
| | |
|RELOCATION | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 21a: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation (no trace related messages
transferred)
RNS-A 3G-MSC-A MSC-B

| (*) |
|RELOCATION | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| |request(**) | |Possible Alloc. |
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | |MSC INVOKE TRACE |
| | |--------------->(***)
Figure 21b: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation (MSC invoke trace message
transferred)
ETSI
AN-APDU parameter.
(***): MSC INVOKE TRACE is forwarded to BSS-B if supported by MSC-B.
a) successful radio resources allocation and handover number allocation (if performed):
RNS-A 3G-MSC-A MSC-B BSS-B

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
|RELOCATION COMMAND | |
|<--------------| | |
b) radio resources allocation queued and successful handover number allocation (if performed). Later successful

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |<------------------------|
| RELOCATION COMMAND SIGNALLING request | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
Figure 22: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover execution (Positive outcomes)
c) user error detected, or handover number allocation unsuccessful (if performed), or component rejection or
dialogue abortion performed by MSC-B:

| | | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | | |
|RELOCATION PREPARATION | |
|<--------------| | |
|FAILURE(Note 1)| | |
| | | |
ETSI

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | | |
|<--------------| | |
f) unsuccessful handover execution (Reversion to the old radio resources):

| | | |
|RELOCATION | | |
|-------------->| | |
|CANCEL | | |
| |MAP U -ABORT | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | |------------------>|
|RELOCATION | | |
|<--------------| | |
|CANCEL ACK | | |
NOTE 1: Possible rejection of the handover because of the negative outcome of MAP or RANAP procedure.

| | | |
| | |HANDOVER COMPLETE |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|IU RELEASE COMMAND | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
Positive outcome:
ETSI

| | | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | response |CLEAR COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | | (Note 2) |
Negative outcome:
| | | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
NOTE 2: From interworking between MAP and BSSMAP point of view, when the call is released.
The handover procedure is normally triggered by RNS-A by sending a RELOCATION REQUIRED message on Iu-
Interface to 3G-MSC-A. The invocation of the Basic Inter-MSC handover procedure is performed and controlled by
3G-MSC-A. The sending of the MAP Prepare-Handover request to MSC-B is triggered in 3G-MSC-A upon receipt of
the RELOCATION REQUIRED message. For compatibility reason, the cell identity of the cell where the call is to be
handed over in MSC-B area, provided in the RELOCATION REQUIRED message, is mapped into targetCellId MAP
parameter and the HANDOVER REQUEST message is encapsulated in the AN-APDU MAP parameter of the
Prepare-Handover MAP request. MSC-B can invoke another operation towards the VLR-B (allocation of the handover
number described in 3GPP TS 29.002 [9]).
Additionally, if tracing activity has been invoked, the trace related message can be transferred on the E-Interface
encapsulated in the AN-APDU MAP parameter of the Prepare-Handover Request. If transferred, one complete trace
related message at a time shall be included in the AN-APDU MAP parameter after the HANDOVER REQUEST
message.
The interworking between Prepare Handover and RELOCATION REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION REQUIRED MAP PREPARE HANDOVER request|
message | |
| RANAP information -targetCellId |
| elements -AN-APDU( | 2
| |
| MSC INVOKE TRACE) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| RELOCATION CMD MAP PREPARE HANDOVER response|
result | | 3
| -AN-APDU( |
| ACKNOWLEDGE) |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| RELOCATION PREP FAILURE MAP PREPARE HANDOVER| 4
result | |
| Relocation failure in System Failure |
| target RNC/CN or target system |
|" No Handover Number |
| available |
|" UnexpectedDataValue|
|" Data Missing |
| |
|" MAP CLOSE |
|" MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: The BSSMAP information elements are already stored in 3G-MSC.
The ho-NumberNotRequired parameter is included by 3G-MSC-A, when 3G-MSC-A decides not to use
any circuit connection with MSC-B. No handover number shall be present in the positive result. Any
negative response from MSC-B shall not be due to handover number allocation problem.
NOTE 2: The process performed on the RANAP information elements received in the RELOCATION REQUIRED
message is described in the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7].
NOTE 3: The response to the Prepare-Handover request can include in its AN-APDU parameter, identifying the
3GPP TS 48.006 protocol, either a BSSMAP QUEUING INDICATION, or a BSSMAP HANDOVER
REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE.
In the first case, 3G-MSC-A shall wait for the radio resources allocation response from MSC-B,
transmitted to 3G-MSC-A as described in subclause 4.5.4.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in 3G-MSC-A the sending on Iu-Interface of the
RELOCATION CMD.
In the third case, the positive result triggers in 3G-MSC-A.
NOTE 4: The possible sending of the RELOCATION PREP FAILURE message is described in the 3G 25.413.
(The possible sending of the RELOCATION PREP FAILURE message upon receipt of the HANDOVER
FAILURE is out of the scope of the 3GPP TS 29.010 and lies in the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7]).
The interworking between Send End Signal and HANDOVER COMPLETE in MSC-B is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL request |
message | |
| -AN-APDU( |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| CLEAR COMMAND MAP SEND END SIGNAL response|
result | -Call Control release | 1
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| CLEAR COMMAND |
result | -Call Control release MAP CLOSE | 2
| -Call Control release MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: The positive empty result triggers the clearing of the Radio Resources on the A-Interface and the release
of the SCCP connection between MSC-B and BSS-B. If a circuit connection is used between 3G_MSC-A
and MSC-B, the 'Call Control release' clearing cause shall only be given to BSS-B when MSC-B has
received a clearing indication on its circuit connection with 3G_MSC-A.
NOTE 2: The abortion of the dialogue or the rejection of the component triggers in MSC-B the clearing of its
circuit connection with 3G_MSC-A, if any, of the Radio Resources on the A-Interface and the release of
the SCCP connection between MSC-B and BSS-B.
The interworking between Send End Signal and IU RELEASE COMMAND in 3G_MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP SEND END SIGNAL IU RELEASE COMMAND |
| -AN-APDU(HANDOVER COMPLETE) |
| Successful Relocation |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
The interworking between RELOCATION CANCEL in case of reversion to old channel of the UE and User Abort in
3G-MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION CANCEL MAP U -ABORT |
message | |
| -Relocation cancelled |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| RELOCATION CANCEL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
4.6.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover from 3G-MSC-B back to MSC-A

When a Mobile Station is being handed over back to MSC-A, the procedure (described in TS 23.009) requires
interworking between A-Interface, Iu-interface and E-Interface.
figures 27 to 31.
ETSI
RNS-A 3G-MSC-B MSC-A

| | |
|RELOCATION | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>|
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 27: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A initiation

RNS-A 3G-MSC-B MSC-A BSS-B
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |<------------------------| |
|RELOCATION CMD | | |
|<--------------| | |
b) radio resources allocation queued. Later successful radio resources allocation indication:
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |<------------------------| |
|RELOCATION CMD | | |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 28: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A execution (Positive
outcome)
c) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by MSC-A:

| |<------------------------| |
|RELOCATION PREP| response negative result| |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
d) component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by MSC-A:
| |<------------------------| |
|IU RELEASE | | |
|<--------------| | |
| COMMAND | | |
e) radio resources allocation failure:
ETSI

| | | HANDOVER FAILURE |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|RELOCATION PREP| HANDOVER response | |
|<--------------| | |
f) radio resources allocation queued. Later unsuccessful radio resources allocation:
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|RELOCATION PREP| SIGNALLING request | |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 29: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A execution
(Negative outcome)
BSS-B MSC-A 3G-MSC-B RNS-A
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|COMPLETE |------------------------>| |
| | response | |
| | |Iu RELEASE COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 30: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A completion

BSS-B MSC-A 3G-MSC-B RNS-A
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|COMPLETE |------------------------>| |
| | response | |
| | | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | |Iu RELEASE COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | |(Note 1) |
Figure 31: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to MSC-A completion (Unsuccessful
completion of the procedure)
NOTE 1: Abnormal end of the procedure which triggers the clearing of all resources in 3G-MSC-B.
The interworking between Prepare Subsequent Handover and RELOCATION REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward |REL. REQUIRED MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
message | request |
| |
| -targetCellId |
| -AN-APDU( |
| |
| |
| RANAP information BSSMAP information |
| elements: elements: |
| |
| MS Classmark 2 CM2 |
| Source Id Cell Id (serving) |
| Target Id Cell Id (target) |
| Cause Cause |1
| MS Classmark 3 CM3 |
| |
| info stored/generated |
| in/by 3G-MSC-B: |
| Message Type |
| Channel Type |
| Speech version |
| Priority |
| Interference Band |
| to be used |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive|RELOCATION CMD. MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
| -AN-APDU( |
| ACKNOWLEDGE or |
| |
| L3 information L3 information |
| |
| |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| REL. PREP. FAILURE MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT| 3
| Relocation Failure in Target CN/RNC or Target System
Unknown MSC |
Subsequent Handover |
| Failure |
| |
UnexpectedDataValue |
Data Missing |
| |
| Iu RELEASE COMMAND |
| |
| Relocation Cancelled MAP CLOSE |
| Relocation Cancelled MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: The mapping of cause code values between BSSMAP and RANAP is FFS.
NOTE 2: The response to the Prepare-Subsequent-Handover request can include in its AN-APDU parameter,
identifying the 3GPP TS 48.006 protocol, a BSSMAP QUEUING INDICATION, or a BSSMAP
HANDOVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE or a BSSMAP HANDOVER FAILURE.
In the first case, 3G-MSC-B shall wait for the radio resources allocation response from MSC-A,
transmitted to 3G-MSC-B as described in subclause 4.5.4.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in 3GMSC-B the sending on Iu-Interface of the
RELOCATION COMMAND.
ETSI
In the third case, the positive result triggers in 3G-MSC-B the sending of the RELOCATION
PREPARATION FAILURE.
NOTE 3: The possible sending of the RELOCATION PREPARATION FAILURE message is described in 3GPP
TS 25.413 [7].
The interworking between Send End Signal Result and HANDOVER COMPLETE in MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| |
NOTE: The abortion of the dialogue ends the handover procedure with 3G-MSC-B.

require one specific interworking case in MSC-A between E-Interface from 3G-MSC-B and E-Interface from MSC-B'
other than the combination of the ones described in subclauses 4.6.1 and 4.6.2.
RNS-A 3G-MSC-B MSC-A MSC-B'
| | | |
|RELOCATION | | |
|----------->|MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT| |
|REQUIRED |--------------------->| |
| | |--------------->|
| | | |+-------+
| | | ||Possib.|
| | | ||Alloc. |
| | | ||of ho. |
| | | ||number |
| | | || VLR-B |
| | | |+-------+
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |-------->|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | |
Figure 32: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (MSC-B') initiation
ETSI

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | ACKNOWLEDGE
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| RELOCATION | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
| | | | |
b) radio resources allocation queued and successful handover number allocation, if performed. Later successful

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | | QUEUING |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |INDICAT. |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | ACKNOWLEDGE
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |MAP FORWARD ACCESS |SIGNALLING request |
| |<---------------------| | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
Figure 33: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (MSC-B') execution
(Positive outcome)
c) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by MSC-B':
ETSI

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | |MAP CLOSE | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| RELOCATION |result | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| PREPARATION| | | |
| FAILURE | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |FAILURE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
|<-----------| | | |
| FAILURE | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |

| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | | QUEUING |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |INDICAT. |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |FAILURE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| | |SIGNALLING request |
| |MAP FORWARD ACCESS | | |
| |<---------------------| | |
|<-----------| | | |
| FAILURE | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |
Figure 34: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (MSC-B') execution (Negative
outcome)
ETSI
Positive outcome:
| | | |
| | | | BSS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |HANDOVER |
| | | |<--------|
| | | |COMPLETE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| | MAP SEND END SIGNAL | | |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | response | | |
| IU-RELEASE | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
Negative outcome:
| | | |
|RELOCATION | | | BSS-B'
|----------->| | | |
|CANCEL |MAP PROCESS ACCESS | | |
| |--------------------->| | |
| | | | |
| | |--------------->| |
| | | |CLEAR |
| | | |-------->|
| | | |COMMAND |
|RELOCATION | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
|CANCEL ACK | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
NOTE 1: Specific interworking case detailed below.
FAILURE encapsulated in a Process Access Signalling from 3G-MSC-B and the abortion of the dialogue with MSC-B'
in the case of a reversion to old channel of the MS:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
message | request |
| |
| -AN-APDU( MAP U -ABORT | 1
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| |
NOTE 1: The abortion of the dialogue triggers in MSC-B' the clearing of the circuit connection with MSC-A, if
any, and of the Resources between MSC-B' and BSS-B'.The abortion of the dialogue ends the handover
procedure with MSC-B'.
NOTE 2: The abortion of the dialogue ends the handover procedure with 3G-MSC-B.

The handling is described in chapter 4.5.4.
4.6.5 Processing in MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface

The handling is described in chapter 4.5.5.
4.6.6 Cause Code Mapping

When a Mobile Station is handed over between UMTS and GSM, a mapping of the cause codes used in the RANAP
and the BSSMAP protocols is needed. The mapping described here is applicable to the BSSMAP protocol even when
used inside MAP in the E-interface.
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Relocation Required and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Handover Request is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
RELOCATION REQUIRED HANDOVER REQUEST |
|
-Time critical relocation -'uplink quality' |
-Resource optimisation -Traffic |
relocation |
-Relocation desirable for -Better cell |
radio reasons |
-Directed retry -Directed retry |
-Reduce Load in -Reduce Load in |
serving cell serving cell |
-Any other value -Better cell |
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Relocation Cancel and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Clear Command is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
RELOCATION CANCEL CLEAR COMMAND |
|
-Trelocprepexpiry -Radio interface |
failure, reversion to |
old channel |
-Interaction with other -Radio interface |
procedure failure, reversion to |
old channel |
-Any other value -Radio interface |
failure, reversion to |
old channel |
The mapping between the cause codes received in BSSMAP Handover Failure and the cause codes sent in RANAP
Relocation Preparation Failure is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
48.008 25.413 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
HANDOVER FAILURE RELOCATION PREP. FAILURE|
|
-Ciphering algorithm not -Requested ciphering |
supported and/or integrity |
protection is not |
supported |
-Circuit pool mismatch | 1
-Equipment failure -Relocation failure in |
Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Invalid message contents -Abstract Syntax Error |
-No radio resource available -No Radio Resources |
Available in Target |
Cell |
-O and M intervention -O and M intervention |
-Radio interface failure, | 2
reversion to old channel |
-Radio interface message -Relocation failure in |
failure Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Requested speech version -Relocation failure in |
unavailable Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Requested terrestrial -Relocation failure in |
resource unavailable Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Requested transcoding/rate -Relocation failure in |
adaption unavailable Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Switch circuit pool | 1
-Terrestrial circuit already -Relocation failure in |
allocated Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Traffic load in the target -Traffic load in the |
cell higher than in the -target cell higher |
source cell than in the source |
cell |
-Any other value -Relocation failure in |
Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
NOTE 1: Cause code not used at inter-system handover.
NOTE 2: Cause code not applicable to this traffic case.
The mapping between the cause codes received in BSSMAP Clear Request and the cause codes sent in RANAP Iu
Release Request is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
48.008 25.413 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
CLEAR REQUEST IU RELEASE REQUEST |
|
-Radio interface message -Relocation failure in |
failure Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Equipment failure -Relocation failure in |
Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
-Joined group call channel -Unspecified failure |
-Protocol failure between BSS -Message not compatible|
and MSC with receiver state |
-Preemption -RAB pre-empted |
-Access restricted due -Access restricted due |
to shared networks to shared networks |
-Any other value -Relocation failure in |
Target CN/RNC or |
target system |
4.7 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to UMTS)

necessary information for interworking between the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7] RANAP protocol, GSM handover procedures
and the 3GPP TS 29.002 [9] MAP protocol. The RANAP protocol is used between the RNS and the 3G_MSC.
The following four principles apply for the Inter-MSC handover GSM to UMTS:
The BSSMAP parameters required for Inter-MSC handover GSM to UMTS are generated as in GSM.
Received RANAP parameters, e.g. cause code or transparent container, are mapped to the appropriate BSSMAP
parameters, e.g. cause code or Handover command.
The RANAP parameters required for Inter-MSC handover GSM to UMTS are generated from received or stored GSM
parameters.

When a Mobile Station is handed over between two MSCs, the establishment of a connection between them (described
in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]) requires interworking between A-Interface, Iu-Interface and E-Interface.
The signalling at initiation, execution and completion of the Basic Inter-MSC handover procedure is shown in figures
37 to 42 with both possible positive or negative outcomes.
Additionally figure 37b shows the possible interworking when the trace related message is transparently transferred on
the E-Interface at Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation.
ETSI
BSS-A MSC-A 3G-MSC-B

| | |
|HANDOVER | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | |RELOCATION REQUEST |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 37a: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation (no trace related messages
transferred)
BSS-A MSC-A 3G-MSC-B

| (*) |
|HANDOVER | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| |request (**) | |Possible Alloc. |
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | |CN INVOKE TRACE |
| | |--------------->(***)
Figure 37b: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover initiation (CN invoke trace message transferred)
AN-apdu parameter.
(***): CN INVOKE TRACE is forwarded to RNS-B if supported by 3G_MSC-B.
Possible Positive outcomes: successful radio resources allocation and handover number allocation (if performed):
BSS-A MSC-A 3G-MSC-B RNS-B

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| | |LOCATION REPORTING |
| | |------------------>|
| | |CONTROL |
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 38: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Handover execution (Positive outcome)
a) user error detected, or handover number allocation unsuccessful (if performed), or component rejection or
dialogue abortion performed by 3G_MSC-B:
ETSI

| | | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
b) radio resources allocation failure:

| | | |
| | |RELOCATION FAILURE |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
c) unsuccessful handover execution (Reversion to the old radio resources):

| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|-------------->| | |
|FAILURE | | |
| |MAP U -ABORT | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | |IU RELEASE COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
NOTE 1: Possible rejection of the handover because of the negative outcome of MAP or RANAP procedure.

| | | |
| | |RELOCATION COMPLETE|
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
Positive outcome:
| | | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | response |IU RELEASE COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | | (Note 2) |
Negative outcome:
ETSI

| | | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
NOTE 2: From interworking between MAP and RANAP point of view, when the call is released.
| | | |
| | |LOCATION REPORT |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| |SIGNALLING | |
Figure 42a: Signalling for updating of anchor MSC after change of location in RNS
The handover procedure is normally triggered by BSS-A by sending a HANDOVER REQUIRED message on
A-Interface to MSC-A. The invocation of the Basic Inter-MSC handover procedure is performed and controlled by
MSC-A. The sending of the MAP Prepare-Handover request to 3G_MSC-B is triggered in MSC-A upon receipt of the
HANDOVER REQUIRED message. The identity of the target RNC where the call is to be handed over in 3G_MSC-B
area, provided in the HANDOVER REQUIRED message in the information element Cell Identifier List (Preferred), is
mapped to the target RNC Id MAP parameter and the HANDOVER REQUEST message is encapsulated in the an-
APDU MAP parameter of the Prepare-Handover MAP request. 3G_MSC-B can invoke another operation towards the
VLR-B (allocation of the handover number described in 3GPP TS 29.002 [9]).
Additionally, if tracing activity has been invoked, the trace related message can be transferred on the E-Interface
encapsulated in the an-APDU MAP parameter of the Prepare-Handover Request. If transferred, one complete trace
related message at a time shall be included in the an-APDU MAP parameter after the HANDOVER REQUEST
message. Note: UMTS supports only CN initiated tracing.
The interworking between Prepare Handover and HANDOVER REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER REQUIRED MAP PREPARE HANDOVER request|
message | |
| BSSMAP information -target RNC Id |
| elements -IMSI |
| -Integrity protection| 2
| info |
| -Encryption info |
| -an-APDU( | 3
| MSC INVOKE TRACE) | 4
| GERAN classmark -GERAN classmark | 7
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PREPARE HANDOVER response|
result | | 5
| -an-APDU( |
| HANDOVER REQUEST |
| ACKNOWLEDGE or |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT MAP PREPARE HANDOVER| 6
result | |
| equipment failure System Failure |
| equipment failure No Handover Number |
| available |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: The ho-NumberNotRequired parameter is included by MSC-A, when MSC-A decides not to use any
circuit connection with 3G_MSC-B. No handover number shall be present in the positive result. Any
negative response from 3G_MSC-B shall not be due to handover number allocation problem.
NOTE 2: Integrity protection information, encryption information and IMSI parameters are included by MSC-A,
only when the MSC-A uses 29.002 as per release 99. These IEs are not included if the MSC-A is R98 or
earlier.
NOTE 3: NOTE 3: The process performed on the BSSMAP information elements received in the HANDOVER
REQUIRED message is described in the 3GPP TS 48.008 [12].
NOTE 4: The process performed on the BSSMAP information elements received in the MSC INVOKE TRACE
message is described in subclause 4.5.5.6.
NOTE 5: The response to the Prepare-Handover request can include in its an-APDU parameter, identifying the
3GPP TS 48.006 protocol, either a BSSMAP HANDOVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE or a
BSSMAP HANDOVER FAILURE.
In the first case, the positive result triggers in MSC-A the sending on A-Interface of the HANDOVER
COMMAND.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in MSC-A optionally the sending of the HANDOVER
REQUIRED REJECT.
48.008 [12].
NOTE 7: If the GERAN Classmark was not received with the HANDOVER REQUIRED message initiating the
handover, MSC-A shall include any previously received GERAN Classmark. See 3GPP TS 43.051 [17].
The interworking between Prepare Handover and RELOCATION REQUEST in 3G_MSC-B is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP PREPARE HANDOVER RELOCATION REQUEST |
message | request |
| -ho-NumberNotRequired |
| -target RNC Id |
| -IMSI |
| -Integrity protection info | 1
| -Encryption info |
| -RANAP service handover |
| -UESBI |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| BSSMAP information RANAP information |
| |
| Channel Type RAB parameters |
| Cause Cause |
| sRNC to tRNC container sRNC to tRNC container|
| SNA Access Information SNA Access Information| 3
| |
| in/by 3G_MSC-B: |
| CN domain indicator |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PREPARE HANDOVER RELOCATION REQUEST ACK |
result | response |
| -an-APDU( |
| HANDOVER REQUEST ACK) |
| |
| |
| Layer 3 info tRNC to sRNC container|
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| MAP PREPARE HANDOVER RELOCATION FAILURE |
result | response |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| GERAN classmark GERAN classmark | 2
| |
NOTE 1: Integrity protection information, encryption information, IMSI and RANAP service handover parameters
are included by MSC-A only when the MSC-A uses 29.002 as per release 99. These IEs are not included
if the MSC-A is R98 or earlier.
NOTE 2: If a handover to GERAN Iu-mode failed, the target RNS may include a GERAN classmark in the
RELOCATION FAILURE message. See 3GPP TS 43.051 [17].
NOTE 3: SNA Access Information parameter is included by MSC-A only when the MSC-A uses 29.002 as per
release 5. This IE is not included if the MSC-A is release 4 or earlier.
The interworking between Send End Signal and RELOCATION COMPLETE in 3G_MSC-B is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL request |
message | |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| IU RELEASE COMMAND MAP SEND END SIGNAL response|
result | -Normal release | 1
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| IU RELEASE COMMAND |
result | -Normal release MAP CLOSE | 2
| -Normal release MAP U/P -ABORT|
| |
NOTE 1: The positive empty result triggers the clearing of the Radio Resources on the Iu-Interface and the release
of the SCCP connection between 3G_MSC-B and RNS-B. If a circuit connection is used between MSC-A
and 3G_MSC-B, the 'Normal release' clearing cause shall only be given to RNS-B when 3G_MSC-B has
received a clearing indication on its circuit connection with MSC-A.
NOTE 2: The abortion of the dialogue or the rejection of the component triggers in 3G_MSC-B the clearing of its
circuit connection with MSC-A, if any, of the Radio Resources on the Iu-Interface and the release of the
SCCP connection between 3G_MSC-B and RNS-B.
The interworking between Send End Signal and CLEAR COMMAND in MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP SEND END SIGNAL CLEAR COMMAND |
message | request |
| -an-APDU( - Handover |
| HANDOVER COMPLETE) Successful |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
The interworking between HANDOVER FAILURE in case of reversion to old channel of the MS and User Abort in
MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER FAILURE MAP U -ABORT |
message | |
| - Reversion to old |
| channel |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
4.7.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover from MSC-B back to 3G_MSC-A

When a Mobile Station is being handed over back to 3G_MSC-A, the procedure (described in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2])
requires interworking between A-Interface, Iu-Interface and E-Interface.
figures 43 to 47.
ETSI
BSS-A MSC-B 3G-MSC-A

| | |
|HANDOVER | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>|
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 43: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to 3G_MSC-A initiation
Possible Positive outcomes: successful radio resources allocation:
BSS-A MSC-B 3G-MSC-A RNS-B

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 44: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to 3G_MSC-A execution (Positive
outcome)
a) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by 3G_MSC-A:

| |<------------------------| |
|HANDOVER REQUIRED response negative result |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
b) component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by 3G_MSC-A:
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
c) radio resources allocation failure:
| | | RELOCATION FAILURE|
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|HANDOVER REQUIRED HANDOVER response | |
|<--------------| | |
ETSI
d) unsuccessful relocation execution (reversion to the old radio resources):

|HANDOVER | | |
|-------------->| | |
|FAILURE |MAP PROCESS ACCESS | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | SIGNALLING request |IU RELEASE COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
Figure 45: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to 3G_MSC-A execution
(Negative outcome)
RNS-B 3G-MSC-A MSC-B BSS-A
| | | |
|RELOCATION | | |
|COMPLETE |------------------------>| |
| | response | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 46: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to 3G_MSC-A completion

RNS-B 3G-MSC-A MSC-B BSS-A
| | | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | |------------------>|
| | |(Note 1) |
Figure 47: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover back to 3G_MSC-A completion
NOTE 1: Abnormal end of the procedure that triggers the clearing of all resources in MSC-B.
The interworking between Prepare Subsequent Handover and HANDOVER REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward |HANDOVER REQUIRED MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
| |
| BSSMAP information -target RNC Id |
| elements -an-APDU( |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive|HANDOVER REQUIRED MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
| -an-APDU( |
| HANDOVER REQUEST |
| ACKNOWLEDGE or |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT| 3
| equipment failure Unknown MSC |
| equipment failure Subsequent Handover|
| Failure |
| |
| CLEAR COMMAND |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: The processing performed on the BSSMAP information elements received in the HANDOVER
3G_MSC-A by MSC-B based on the information received from RNS-B.
NOTE 2: The response to the Prepare-Subsequent-Handover request can include in its an-APDU parameter,
identifying the 3GPP TS 48.006 protocol, either a BSSMAP HANDOVER REQUEST
ACKNOWLEDGE or a BSSMAP HANDOVER FAILURE.
In the first case, the positive result triggers in MSC-B the sending on A-Interface of the HANDOVER
COMMAND.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in MSC-B optionally the sending of the HANDOVER
REQUIRED REJECT.
48.008 [12].
NOTE 4: If the GERAN Classmark was not received with the HANDOVER REQUIRED message initiating the
handover, MSC-B shall include any previously received GERAN Classmark. See 3GPP TS 43.051 [17].
The interworking between Prepare Subsequent Handover and RELOCATION REQUEST in 3G_MSC-A is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP PREPARE SUB HANDOVER RELOCATION REQUEST |
message | request |
| -ho-NumberNotRequired |
| -target RNC ID |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| Cause Cause |
| sRNC to tRNC container sRNC to tRNC container|
| |
| in/by 3G_MSC-A: |
| CN domain indicator |
| RAB parameters |
| Permanent NAS UE id |
| Encryption info |
| Integrity protection |
| info |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PREPARE SUB HANDOVER RELOCATION REQUEST ACK|
result | response |
| -an-APDU( |
| HANDOVER REQUEST ACK) |
| |
| |
| Layer 3 info tRNC to sRNC container|
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| MAP SUB PREPARE HANDOVER RELOCATION FAILURE |
result | response |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| |
| GERAN classmark GERAN classmark | 1
| |
NOTE 1: If a handover to GERAN Iu-mode failed, the target RNS may include a GERAN classmark in the
RELOCATION FAILURE message. See 3GPP TS 43.051 [17].
The interworking between HANDOVER FAILURE and MAP Process Signalling Request in 3G_MSC-B is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 48.008 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | HANDOVER FAILURE MAP PROCESS-SIGNALLING |
message | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
| |
The interworking between Send End Signal Response and RELOCATION COMPLETE in 3G_MSC-A is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| |

require one specific interworking case in MSC-A (figure 49) between E-Interface from MSC-B and E-Interface from
3G_MSC-B' other than the combination of the ones described in the subclause 4.5.1 and 4.7.2.
BSS-A MSC-B MSC-A 3G-MSC-B'
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | |
|REQUIRED |--------------------->| |
| | |--------------->|
| | | |+-------+
| | | ||Possib.|
| | | ||Alloc. |
| | | ||of ho. |
| | | ||number |
| | | || VLR-B |
| | | |+-------+
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |-------->|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | |
Figure 45: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') initiation

| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |<--------|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | ACKNOWLEDGE
| | | | |
| | | |LOCATION |
| | | |-------->|
| | | |REPORTING|
| | | |CONTROL |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| HANDOVER | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
| | | | |
Figure 46: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') execution
(Positive outcome)
ETSI
a) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by MSC-B':

| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | |MAP CLOSE | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| HANDOVER |result | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| REQUIRED | | | |
| REJECT | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |

| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |<--------|
| | | |FAILURE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| HANDOVER | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| REQUIRED | | | |
| REJECT | | | |
| (Note 1) | | | |
Figure 47: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') execution
(Negative outcome)
Positive outcome:
| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |<--------|
| | | |COMPLETE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| | MAP SEND END SIGNAL |request | |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | response | | |
| CLEAR | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
Figure 48: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') completion
ETSI
Negative outcome:
| | | |
|HANDOVER | | | RNS-B'
|----------->| | | |
|FAILURE |MAP PROCESS ACCESS | | |
| |--------------------->| | |
| | | | |
| | |--------------->| |
| | | |IU RELEASE
| | | |-------->|
| | | |COMMAND |
| | | | |
Figure 49: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Handover to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') completion
NOTE: Specific interworking case detailed below.

BSS-A MSC-A 3G-MSC-B' RNS-B'
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| |SIGNALLING | |
Figure 49a: Signalling for updating of anchor MSC after change of location in RNS
FAILURE encapsulated in a Process Access Signalling from MSC-B and the abortion of the dialogue
with 3G_MSC-B' in the case of a reversion to old channel of the MS:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
message | request |
| |
| -an-APDU( MAP U -ABORT | 1
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| |
NOTE 1: The abortion of the dialogue triggers in 3G_MSC-B' the clearing of the circuit connection with MSC-A, if
any, and of the Resources between 3G_MSC-B' and RNS-B'. The abortion of the dialogue ends the
handover procedure with 3G_MSC-B'.

The handling is described in chapter 4.5.4, additional cases are described in this chapter.
4.7.4.1 Assignment
The interworking between the BSSMAP assignment messages in MAP and the RANAP RAB assignment messages is
as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP PREPARE HANDOVER RAB ASSIGNMENT REQ|
message | request |
| -RANAP service Service handover |
| handover |
| -an-APDU( |
| ASSIGNMENT REQUEST) |
| |
| |
| Channel Type RAB parameters |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PREPARE HANDOVER |
result | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| ASSIGNMENT COMPLETE RAB ASSIGNMENT |
| RESPONSE |
| or (positive result)|
| ASSIGNMENT FAILURE) RAB ASSIGNMENT |
| RESPONSE |
| (negative result)|
| |
| |
| Cause Cause | 1
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | MAP U/P –ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: For the mapping between the cause codes see subclause 4.7.6.
4.7.4.2 Cipher Mode Control

The interworking between the BSSMAP cipher mode messages in MAP and the RANAP security mode messages is as
follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIGN. SECURITY MODE CMD |
message | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| CIPHER MODE CMD) |
| |
| |
| Encryption information Integrity |
| protection info|
| Encryption info |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PROCESS ACCESS SIGN. |
result | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| CIPHER MODE COMPLETE SECURITY MODE |
| or COMPLETE |
| CIPHER MODE REJECT) SECURITY MODE |
| REJECT |
| |
| |
| Encryption information Integrity |
| protection info|
| Encryption info |
| Cause Cause | 1
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | MAP U/P –ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: For the mapping between the cause codes see subclause 4.7.6.
4.7.4.3 Location Reporting Control
The interworking between the RANAP location report message and the BSSMAP handover performed message in
MAP is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | LOCATION REPORT MAP PROC. ACC. SIGNALLING |
message | |
| -an-APDU( |
| HANDOVER PERFORMED)|
| |
| |
| Area identity (SAI) Cell identifier |
| Cause Cause |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
4.7.5 Processing in 3G_MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface

MSC-B. The relevant BSSMAP procedures are mentioned to ease the comprehension, their detailed description is the
ETSI
scope of 3GPP TS 48.008 [12]. Each BSSMAP message listed in 3GPP TS 49.008 [14] being transferred on E-interface
shall use the mechanisms given in subclause 4.5.4 and is described in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12].

The list of GSM algorithms, the ciphering key and the chosen algorithm shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and used for
generating the UMTS parameters Encryption Information and Integrity Protection Information if they are not received
in MAP Prepare Handover Request (the generation of the UMTS parameters from the GSM parameters is described in
TS 33.102).
If ciphering has not been performed before Inter-MSC Handover, this will be controlled by MSC-A after the
- in the Handover Request BSSMAP message (information included).
The Handover Request Acknowledge should in this case NOT contain the indication of the chosen
algorithm.
- in the Cipher Mode Command procedure between MSC-A and 3G_MSC-B.

The Channel Type shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and used for generating RAB parameters.
Independently of the type of resource (Signalling only or traffic channel) assigned to the MS, the Channel Type
Information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
Chosen Channel and/or Speech Version shall NOT be reported back to MSC-A in the Handover Request
Acknowledge
If a new type of resource is to be assigned after Inter-MSC Handover, this can be made with:
- the BSSMAP Assignment procedure between MSC-A and 3G_MSC-B.
4.7.5.3 Classmark
This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and might be received from MSC-A.
Transfer of Information due to Classmark received from MSC-A:
This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and is received:
- in the Handover Request BSSMAP message.
If a new type of resource is to be assigned after Inter-MSC Handover, Classmark Information MAY be included:
- in the BSSMAP Assignment procedure.
4.7.5.4 Priority
The parameter shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and used for generating RAB parameters. It is received as detailed below:
ETSI
Received by 3G_MSC-B from MSC-A in:
4.7.5.5 MSC-Invoke Trace Information Elements

The process to be performed by 3G_MSC-B on the information elements of the MSC Invoke Trace BSSMAP messages
is left for further study.
Note that MSC-A does not forward BSC Invoke Trace in case of GSM to UMTS handover.
4.7.5.6 Selected UMTS Algorithm

A sequence of possible encryption and integrity protection algorithms, received from the 3G_MSC-A, can be sent to an
RNS in Relocation Request or in Security Mode Command in case of cipher mode setting after inter-MSC handover
from GSM to UMTS. The RNS chooses one of the listed algorithms and reports this back to the 3G_MSC in Relocation
Request Acknowledge or Security Mode Complete respectively. The MSC-B provides the Selected UMTS algorithm
information to the MSC-A. The Selected UMTS algorithms IE in the MAP Process Access Signalling Request and
MAP Prepare Handover Response messages refers to the Chosen Integrity Protection Algorithm and Chosen Encryption
Algorithm, defined in RANAP specification 3GPP TS 25.413 [7]
The selected algorithm shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B, and sent to 3G_MSC-A.
If Ciphering has been performed before Inter-MSC Handover, Selected UMTS algorithm information is received
by 3G_MSC-A from 3G_MSC-B in:
− The Prepare Handover Response MAP message.
If Ciphering has NOT been performed before Inter-MSC Handover, Selected UMTS algorithm information is
received by 3G_MSC-A from 3G_MSC-B in:
4.7.5.7 Allowed UMTS Algorithms

In case of GSM-subscriber, the Integrity Protection Information and UMTS Encryption Information are not transferred
to the MSC-B during inter-MSC handover from GSM to UMTS. Allowed UMTS algorithms is UMTS information that
is required in RANAP Relocation Request and RANAP Security Mode Command, and shall be provided by 3G_MSC-
A. 3G_MSC-B needs this information in case of an inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover and in subsequent security
mode setting, after an inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. Therefore 3G_MSC-A must provide this information in
case of an inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. The Allowed UMTS algorithms IE in the MAP Prepare Handover and
in the MAP Forward Access Signalling Request messages refers to the Permitted Integrity Protection Algorithms in
Integrity Protection Information and Permitted Encryption Algorithms in Encryption Information, defined in RANAP
specification 3GPP TS 25.413 [7].
Allowed UMTS algorithms shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B.
ETSI

handover to GSM.
If a new assignment of a TCH after an inter-MSC handover is to be performed, the BSSMAP Service Handover
− the BSSMAP Assignment procedure.

This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and sent to an RNS in Relocation Request during the basic inter-MSC
handover or when 3G_MSC-B performs a subsequent relocation or handover to UMTS.
and sent by 3G_MSC-B to the RNS in RAB Assignment Request.
4.7.5.10 GERAN Classmark

The GERAN Classmark shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and can be received from MSC-A, from the serving BSS or
serving RNS, or from the target RNS. The GERAN Classmark shall be used together with other parameters, e.g. the
Channel Type, for selecting a service and for generating RAB parameters for handover to GERAN Iu-mode, subsequent
relocation or handover to GERAN Iu-mode, and RAB (re-)assignment when the MS is in GERAN Iu-mode.
Transfer of Information due to GERAN Classmark received from MSC-A:
Received by 3G_MSC-B in:
Transfer of Information due to GERAN Classmark received from the serving BSS or serving RNS:
- the Handover Required BSSMAP message;
- the Relocation Required RANAP message;
- the Initial UE RANAP message; or
- the RAB Assignment Response RANAP message.
ETSI
Transfer of Information due to GERAN Classmark received from the target RNS:
- the Relocation Failure RANAP message.

4.7.5.12 UESBI
handover or when 3G_MSC-B performs a subsequent relocation or handover to UMTS.
4.7.5.13 Alternative Channel Type

This information shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and from this information 3G_MSC-B shall generate Alternative RAB
Parameters Value IE sent to an RNS in Relocation Request, when 3G_MSC-B performs relocation or handover to
UMTS.
The Alternative Channel Type information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
- the Forward Access Signalling Request MAP message.

S, MGW, RNC or BSC.
The Trace Parameter List information for MSC-S, MGW and RNC tracing is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
The Trace Reference and Trace Type information for BSC tracing is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
ETSI
- the MSC Invoke Trace BSSMAP message.

When a Mobile Station is handed over between GSM and UMTS, a mapping of the cause codes used in the BSSMAP
and the RANAP protocols is needed. The mapping described here is applicable to the BSSMAP protocol even when
The mapping between the cause codes received in BSSMAP Handover Required and the cause codes sent in RANAP
Relocation Request is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
48.008 25.413 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
HANDOVER REQUIRED RELOCATION REQUEST |
|
-Better Cell -Relocation Desirable |
for Radio Reasons |
|
-Directed retry -Directed retry |
-Distance -Time critical reloc. |
-Downlink quality -Time critical reloc. |
-Downlink strength -Time critical reloc. |
-Response to MSC invocation -Network Optimisation |
-Traffic -Resource Optimisation |
Relocation |
-Uplink quality -Time critical reloc. |
-Uplink strength -Time critical reloc. |
-Any other value -Relocation Desirable |
For Radio Reasons |
The mapping between the cause codes received in BSSMAP Handover Request and the cause codes sent in RANAP
Relocation Request is as follows (the mapping is only used for the MAP-E interface):
----------------------------------------------------------------
48.008 25.413 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
HANDOVER REQUEST RELOCATION REQUEST |
|
-Better Cell -Relocation Desirable |
for Radio Reasons |
|
-Directed retry - Directed retry |
-Distance -Time critical reloc. |
-Downlink quality -Time critical reloc. |
-Downlink strength -Time critical reloc. |
-Response to MSC invocation -Network Optimisation |
-Traffic -Resource Optimisation |
Relocation |
-Uplink quality -Time critical reloc. |
-Uplink strength -Time critical reloc. |
-Any other value -Relocation Desirable |
For Radio Reasons |
The mapping between the cause codes received in BSSMAP Handover Failure and the cause codes sent in RANAP Iu
Release Command is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
48.008 25.413 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
HANDOVER FAILURE IU RELEASE COMMAND |
|
-Ciphering algorithm not | 2
supported |
-Circuit pool mismatch | 1
-Equipment failure -Relocation cancelled |
-Invalid message contents -Abstract Syntax Error |
-No radio resource available | 2
-Radio interface failure, -Relocation cancelled |
reversion to old channel |
-Radio interface message -Relocation cancelled |
failure |
-Requested speech version | 2
unavailable |
-Requested terrestrial | 2
resource unavailable |
-Requested transcoding/rate | 2
adaption unavailable |
-Terrestrial circuit already -Relocation cancelled |
allocated |
-Any other value -Relocation cancelled |
NOTE 2: Cause code not applicable to this traffic case.
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Relocation Failure and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Handover Failure is as follows (this mapping is only used for the MAP-E interface):
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
RELOCATION FAILURE HANDOVER FAILURE |
|
-GERAN Iu-mode failure -GERAN Iu-mode failure |
cell higher than in the target cell higher |
cell |
-Any other value -No radio resource |
available |
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Relocation Failure and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Handover Required Reject is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
RELOCATION FAILURE HANDOVER REQUIRED REJECT |
|
-Incoming Relocation -Incoming Relocation |
Not Supported Due To Not Supported Due To |
PUESBINE Feature PUESBINE Feature |
cell higher than in the target cell higher |
cell |
available |
The mapping between the RANAP and the BSSMAP assignment messages is used in the MAP-E interface. RANAP
RAB Assignment Response with successful result is mapped to BSSMAP Assignment Complete; RANAP RAB
Assignment Response with unsuccessful result is mapped to BSSMAP Assignment Failure. The mapping between the
cause codes received in RANAP RAB Assignment Response and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP Assignment Failure
is as follows (this mapping is only used for the MAP-E interface):
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
RAB ASSIGNMENT RESPONSE ASSIGNMENT FAILURE |
|
-Requested traffic class not –No radio resource |
available available |
-Invalid RAB parameters value –Invalid msg. contents |
-Requested max bit rate not –No radio resource |
available available |
-Requested max bit rate for DL –No radio resource |
not available available |
-Requested max bit rate for UL –No radio resource |
-Requested guaranteed bit rate –No radio resource |
for DL not available available |
for UL not available available |
-Requested transfer delay not –No radio resource |
achievable available |
-Invalid RAB param. combination–Invalid msg. contents |
-Condition violation for SDU –Invalid msg. contents |
parameters |
-Condition violation for –Invalid msg. contents |
traffic handling priority |
-Condition violation for –Invalid msg. contents |
guaranteed bit rate |
-User plane not supported –No radio resource |
available |
-Iu UP failure –Equipment failure |
-Tqueuing expiry –Radio interface message|
failure |
-Invalid RAB id –Invalid msg. contents |
-Request superseeded –No radio resource |
available |
-Relocation triggered -Relocation triggered |
-Any other value –Radio interface message|
failure |
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Security Mode Reject and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Cipher Mode Reject is as follows (this mapping is only used for the MAP-E interface):
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
SECURITY MODE REJECT CIPHER MODE REJECT |
|
-Requested ciphering and/or –Ciphering algorithm |
integrity protection not supported |
algorithms not supported |
-Failure in the radio –Radio interface message|
interface procedure failure |
-Change of ciphering and/or -Invalid msg. contents |
integrity protection is |
not supported |
-Relocation triggered -Relocation triggered |
-Any other value –Radio interface message|
failure |
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Location Report and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Handover Performed is as follows (this mapping is only used for the MAP-E interface):
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
LOCATION REPORT HANDOVER PERFORMED |
|
-User restriction start ind. –O&M intervention |
-User restriction start ind. –O&M intervention |
-Requested report type not | 1
supported |
-Any other value -Better cell |
NOTE 1: In this case, no Handover Performed is sent.
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Iu Release Request and the cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Clear Request is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
IU RELEASE REQUEST CLEAR REQUEST |
|
-Unspecified failure -Equipment failure |
-Repeated integrity checking -Invalid message |
failure contents |
-Release due to UE generated -Call control |
signalling connection release |
-Radio connection with UE lost –Radio interface |
failure |
-Access restricted due -Access restricted due |
to shared networks to shared networks |
available |
4.8 Inter-MSC Relocation

The general principles of the relocation procedures are given in Technical Specification TS 23.009. TS 29.010 gives the
necessary information for interworking between the TS 25.413 relocation protocol and the TS 29.002 MAP protocol.
For intra UMTS handovers, RANAP is carried over the MAP-E interface instead of BSSAP. Please refer to 3GPP TS
29.108 [15].
4.8.1 Basic Inter-MSC Relocation

When a Mobile Station is relocated between two MSCs, the establishment of a connection between them (described in
TS 23.009) requires interworking between Iu-Interface and E-Interface.
The signalling at initiation, execution and completion of the Basic Inter-MSC relocation procedure is shown in figures
50 to 54 with both possible positive or negative outcomes.
Additionally figure 50b shows the possible interworking when trace related messages are transparently transferred on
the E-Interface at Basic Inter-MSC Relocation initiation.
ETSI
RNS-A 3G-MSC-A 3G-MSC-B

| | |
|RELOCATION | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| | | |of a relocation|
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 50a: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Relocation initiation (no trace related messages
transferred)
RNS-A 3G-MSC-A 3G-MSC-B

| (*) |
|RELOCATION | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>| +----------------+
| |request (**) | |Possible Alloc. |
| | | |of a relocation |
| | | +----------------+
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | |CN INVOKE TRACE |
| | |--------------->(***)
Figure 50b: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Relocation initiation (CN invoke trace message
transferred)
(**): In that case, RELOCATION REQUEST and CN INVOKE TRACE messages are included within the
AN-apdu parameter.
(***): CN INVOKE TRACE is forwarded to RNS-B if supported by 3G_MSC-B.
Possible Positive outcomes: successful radio resources allocation and relocation numbers allocation (if performed):
RNS-A 3G-MSC-A 3G-MSC-B RNS-B

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
| | | |
|<--------------| | |
a) user error detected, or relocation numbers allocation unsuccessful (if performed), or component rejection or
dialogue abortion performed by 3G_MSC-B:
ETSI

| | | |
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
|FAILURE | MAP CLOSE | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | | |

| | | |
| | |RELOCATION FAILURE |
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
|<--------------| | |
|FAILURE | | |
| | | |
c) radio resources allocation partial failure (3G_MSC-A decides to reject the relocation):

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |MAP PREPARE HANDOVER | ACK |
| |<------------------------| |
| | response | |
|<--------------| | |
|FAILURE | | |
| | | |
d) unsuccessful relocation execution (relocation cancelled):

| | | |
|RELOCATION | | |
|-------------->| | |
|CANCEL | | |
| |MAP U -ABORT | |
| |------------------------>| |
|RELOCATION | |------------------>|
|<--------------| | |
|CANCEL ACK | | |
| | | |
Figure 51: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Relocation execution (Negative outcomes)

| | | |
| | |RELOCATION COMPLETE|
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
Figure 52: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Relocation completion
ETSI
Positive outcome
| | | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | response |IU RELEASE COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | | (Note 1) |
Figure 53: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Relocation completion (Positive outcome)
NOTE: From interworking between MAP and RANAP point of view.
Negative outcome:
| | | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
Figure 54: Signalling for Basic Inter-MSC Relocation completion (Negative outcome)
The relocation procedure is normally triggered by RNS-A by sending a RELOCATION REQUIRED message on Iu-
Interface to 3G_MSC-A. The invocation of the Basic Inter-MSC relocation procedure is performed and controlled by
3G_MSC-A. The sending of the MAP Prepare-Handover request to 3G_MSC-B is triggered in 3G_MSC-A upon
receipt of the RELOCATION REQUIRED message. The identity of the target RNC where the call is to be handed over
in 3G_MSC-B area, provided in the RELOCATION REQUIRED message, is mapped to the target RNC Id MAP
parameter and the RELOCATION REQUEST message is encapsulated in the an-APDU MAP parameter of the Prepare-
Handover MAP request. 3G_MSC-B can invoke another operation towards the VLR-B (allocation of the relocation
numbers described in 3GPP TS 29.002 [9]).
Additionally, if tracing activity has been invoked, the trace related messages can be transferred on the E-Interface
encapsulated in the an-APDU MAP parameter of the Prepare-Handover Request. If transferred, one complete trace
related message at a time shall be included in the an-APDU MAP parameter after the RELOCATION REQUEST
message.
The interworking between Prepare Handover and RELOCATION REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION REQUIRED MAP PREPARE HANDOVER request|
message | |
| -target RNC Id |
| RANAP information -Radio Resource Info |
| elements -an-APDU( |
| RELOCATION REQUEST, | 2
| CN INVOKE TRACE) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PREPARE HANDOVER response |
result | | 3
| -relocation numbers |
| -an-APDU( |
| RELOCATION COMMAND RELOCATION REQUEST |
| ACKNOWLEDGE |
| or |
| RELOCATION PREP FAILURE RELOCATION FAILURE)|
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| RELOCATION PREP FAILURE MAP PREPARE HANDOVER|
result | |
| Unspecified failure System Failure |
| Unspecified failure No Handover Number |
| available |
| Unspecified failure UnexpectedDataValue|
| Unspecified failure Data Missing |
| |
| Unspecified failure MAP CLOSE |
| Unspecified failure MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: The RANAP information elements are already stored in 3G_MSC.
The ho-NumberNotRequired parameter is included by 3G_MSC-A, when 3G_MSC-A decides not to use
any circuit connection with 3G_MSC-B. No relocation numbers shall be present in the positive result.
Any negative response from 3G_MSC-B shall not be due to relocation number allocation problem.
NOTE 2: The process performed on the RANAP information elements received in the RELOCATION REQUIRED
message is described in the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7].
NOTE 3: The response to the Prepare-Handover request can include in its an-APDU parameter, identifying the
3GPP TS 25.413 [7] protocol, either a RANAP RELOCATION REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE or a
RANAP RELOCATION FAILURE.
In the first case, the positive result triggers in 3G_MSC-A the sending on Iu-Interface of the
RELOCATION CMD.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in 3G_MSC-A the sending of the RELOCATION PREP
FAILURE.
NOTE 4: If the GERAN Classmark was not received with the RELOCATION REQUIRED message initiating the
relocation, 3G_MSC-A shall include any previously received GERAN Classmark. See 3GPP TS 43.051
[17].
The interworking between Send End Signal and RELOCATION COMPLETE in 3G_MSC-B is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL request |
message | |
| -an-APDU( |
| RELOCATION COMPL) |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| IU RELEASE COMMAND MAP SEND END SIGNAL response|
result | -Normal release | 1
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| IU RELEASE COMMAND |
result | -Normal release MAP CLOSE | 2
| -Normal release MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: The positive empty result triggers the clearing of the Radio Resources on the Iu-Interface and the release
of the SCCP connection between 3G_MSC-B and RNS-B. If a circuit connection is used between
3G_MSC-A and 3G_MSC-B, the 'Normal release' clearing cause shall only be given to RNS-B when
3G_MSC-B has received a clearing indication on its circuit connection with 3G_MSC-A.
NOTE 2: The abortion of the dialogue or the rejection of the component triggers in 3G_MSC-B the clearing of its
circuit connection with 3G_MSC-A, if any, of the Radio Resources on the Iu-Interface and the release of
the SCCP connection between 3G_MSC-B and RNS-B.
The interworking between Send End Signal and IU RELEASE COMMAND in 3G_MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP SEND END SIGNAL IU RELEASE COMMAND |
message | request |
| -an-APDU( - Successful |
| RELOCATION COMPLETE) Relocation |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
The interworking between RELOCATION CANCEL in case of relocation cancelled and User Abort in 3G-MSC-A is
as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION CANCEL MAP U -ABORT |
message | |
| - Relocation |
| cancelled |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| RELOCATION CANCEL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
4.8.2 Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation back to 3G_MSC-A

When a Mobile Station is being relocated back to 3G_MSC-A, the procedure (described in TS 23.009) requires
interworking between Iu-Interface and E-Interface.
The signalling at initiation, execution and completion of the Subsequent Inter-MSC relocation procedure is shown in
figures 55 to 59.
ETSI
RNS-A 3G-MSC-B 3G-MSC-A

| | |
|RELOCATION | |
|REQUIRED |------------------------>|
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
Figure 55: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation back to 3G_MSC-A initiation
RNS-A 3G-MSC-B 3G-MSC-A RNS-B

| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |ACKNOWLEDGE |
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 56: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation back to 3G_MSC-A execution (Positive
outcome)
a) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by 3G_MSC-A:

| |<------------------------| |
|RELOCATION PREP| response negative result |
|<--------------| | |
|FAILURE (Note 1) | |
| | | |
b) component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by 3G_MSC-A:
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
| | | |
c) radio resources allocation failure:
| | | RELOCATION FAILURE|
| | |<------------------|
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
|FAILURE | | |
d) radio resources allocation partial failure (3G_MSC-A decides to reject the relocation):
| | | RELOCATION REQUEST|
| | |<------------------|
| |MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT | ACK |
| |<------------------------| |
|<--------------| | |
|FAILURE | | |
ETSI
e) unsuccessful relocation execution (relocation cancelled):

|RELOCATION | | |
|-------------->| | |
|CANCEL |MAP PROCESS ACCESS | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | SIGNALLING request |IU RELEASE COMMAND |
| | |------------------>|
| | |IU RELEASE COMPLETE|
| | |<------------------|
| |MAP FORWARD ACCESS | |
| |<------------------------| |
| RELOCATION | SIGNALLING request | |
|<--------------| | |
|CANCEL ACK | | |
Figure 57: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation back to 3G_MSC-A execution
(Negative outcome)

| | | |
| | |RELOCATION |
| |MAP SEND END SIGNAL |<------------------|
| |<------------------------|COMPLETE |
| | response | |
|IU RELEASE CMD | | |
|<--------------| | |
Figure 58: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation back to 3G_MSC-A completion

| | | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | |------------------>|
| | |(Note 1) |
Figure 59: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation back to 3G_MSC-A completion
NOTE: Abnormal end of the procedure that triggers the clearing of all resources in 3G_MSC-B.
The interworking between Prepare Subsequent Handover and RELOCATION REQUIRED is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward |REL. REQUIRED MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
message | request |
| |
| -target RNC Id |
| RANAP information -an-APDU( | 1
| elements RELOCATION REQ) |
| |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT HANDOVER|
| -an-APDU( |
|RELOCATION CMD. RELOCATION REQUEST |
| ACKNOWLEDGE |
| or |
|RELOCATION PREP FAILURE RELOCATION FAILURE)|
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| REL. PREP. FAILURE MAP PREPARE SUBSEQUENT|
| Unspecified failure Unknown MSC |
| Unspecified failure Subsequent Handover|
| Failure |
| Unspecified failure UnexpectedDataValue|
| Unspecified failure Data Missing |
| |
| Iu RELEASE COMMAND MAP CLOSE |
| MAP U/P –ABORT |
| Unspecified failure |
| Unspecified failure |
| |
NOTE 1: The processing performed on the RANAP information elements received in the RELOCATION
3G_MSC-A by 3G_MSB-B based on the information received from RNS-B.
NOTE 2: The response to the Prepare-Subsequent-Handover request can include in its an-APDU parameter,
identifying the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7] protocol, a RANAP RELOCATION REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE
or a RANAP RELOCATION FAILURE.
NOTE 3: If the GERAN Classmark was not received with the RELOCATION REQUIRED message initiating the
relocation, MSC-B shall include any previously received GERAN Classmark. See 3GPP TS 43.051 [17].
In the first case, the positive result triggers in 3G_MSC-B the sending on Iu-Interface of the
RELOCATION COMMAND.
In the second case, the positive result triggers in 3G_MSC-B the sending of the RELOCATION
PREPARATION FAILURE.
The interworking between RELOCATION CANCEL and MAP Process Signalling Request in 3G_MSC-A is as
follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP PROCESS-SIGNALLING IU RELEASE COMMAND |
message | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| RELOCATION CANCEL) |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP FORWARD-SIGNALLING IU RELEASE COMPLETE|
result | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| RELOCATION CANCEL ACK) |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
| |
The interworking between RELOCATION CANCEL and MAP Process Signalling Request in 3G_MSC-B is as
follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION CANCEL MAP PROCESS-SIGNALLING |
message | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| RELOCATION CANCEL ACK MAP FORWARD-SIGNALLING |
result | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| RELOCATION CANCEL ACK)|
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
result | |
| |
The interworking between Send End Signal Result and RELOCATION COMPLETE in 3G_MSC-A is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RELOCATION COMPLETE MAP SEND END SIGNAL |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
NOTE: The abortion of the dialogue ends the relocation procedure with 3G_MSC-B.
4.8.3 Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation to third MSC

When a Mobile Station is being relocated to a third MSC, the procedure (described in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]) does require
one specific interworking case in 3G_MSC-A (figure 64) between E-Interface from 3G_MSC-B and E-Interface from
3G_MSC-B' other than the combination of the ones described in the subclause 4.8.1 and 4.8.2.
ETSI
RNS-A 3G-MSC-B 3G-MSC-A 3G-MSC-B'

| | | |
|RELOCATION | | |
|REQUIRED |--------------------->| |
| | |--------------->|
| | | |+-------+
| | | ||Possib.|
| | | ||Alloc. |
| | | ||of relo|
| | | ||number |
| | | || VLR-B |
| | | |+-------+
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |-------->|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | | |
Figure 60: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') initiation

| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |<--------|
| | | |REQUEST |
| | | ACKNOWLEDGE
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
| | | | |
Figure 61: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') execution
(Positive outcome)
a) user error detected, or component rejection or dialogue abortion performed by 3G_MSC-B':

| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | |MAP CLOSE | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
| RELOCATION |result | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| FAILURE | | | |
| | | | |
ETSI

| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |<--------|
| | | |FAILURE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
|<-----------| | | |
| FAILURE | | | |
| | | | |
c) radio resources allocation partial failure (3G_MSC-A decides to reject the relocation):

| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |<--------|
| | | |REQ ACK |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| |<---------------------| | |
|<-----------| | | |
| FAILURE | | | |
| | | | |
Figure 62: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') execution
(Negative outcome)
Positive outcome:
| | | |
| | | | RNS-B'
| | | | |
| | | |RELOCATION
| | | |<--------|
| | | |COMPLETE |
| | | | |
| | |<---------------| |
| | MAP SEND END SIGNAL |request | |
| |<---------------------| | |
| | response | | |
| IU RELEASE | | | |
|<-----------| | | |
| COMMAND | | | |
Figure 63: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') completion
ETSI
Negative outcome:
| | | |
|RELOCATION | | | RNS-B'
|----------->| | | |
|CANCEL |MAP PROCESS ACCESS | | |
| |--------------------->| | |
| | | | |
| | |--------------->| |
| |MAP FORWARD ACCESS | |IU RELEASE
| |<---------------------| |-------->|
|RELOCATION | SIGNALLING request | |COMMAND |
|<-----------| | | |
|CANCEL ACK | | | |
| | | | |
Figure 64: Signalling for Subsequent Inter-MSC Relocation to third MSC (3G_MSC-B') completion
NOTE: Specific interworking case detailed below.
The specific interworking case in 3G_MSC-A compared to the subclauses 4.8.1 and 4.8.2 occurs between
RELOCATION FAILURE encapsulated in a Process Access Signalling from 3G_MSC-B and the abortion of the
dialogue with 3G_MSC-B' in the case of relocation cancelled:
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
message | request |
| |
| -an-APDU( MAP U -ABORT | 1
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| MAP FORWARD-SIGNALLING |
result | request |
| -an-APDU( |
| RELOCATION CANCEL ACK) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| |
NOTE 1: The abortion of the dialogue triggers in 3G_MSC-B' the clearing of the circuit connection with 3G_MSC-
A, if any, and of the Resources between 3G_MSC-B' and RNS-B'. The abortion of the dialogue ends the
relocation procedure with 3G_MSC-B'.
NOTE 2: The abortion of the dialogue ends the relocation procedure with 3G_MSC-B.
4.8.4 RANAP Messages transfer on E-Interface

The following mapping applies to the encapsulation performed in 3G_MSC-A.
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RANAP messages MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIGNALLING|
| |
| -an-APDU (RANAP messages) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | | 2
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| MAP U/P -ABORT |
| |
NOTE 1: Complete RANAP messages to be sent on 3G_MSC-B - RNS-B interface are embedded into the an-
APDU parameter.
NOTE 2: The Return Result does not apply. If 3G_MSC-B returns a message, this message will arrive in an Invoke:
Process Access Signalling.
The following mapping applies to the encapsulation performed in 3G_MSC-B.

----------------------------------------------------------------
| 25.413 29.002 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | RANAP messages MAP PROCESS ACCESS SIGNALLING|
| |
| -an-APDU (RANAP messages) |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Positive| |
result | | 2
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Negative| |
| IU RELEASE COMMAND |
| |
| Unspecified failure MAP U/P -ABORT | 3
| |
NOTE 1: Complete RANAP messages to be sent to 3G_MSC-A are embedded into the an-APDU parameter.
NOTE 2: The Return Result does not apply. If 3G_MSC-A returns a message, this message will arrive in an
Invoke: Forward Access Signalling.
NOTE 3: The abortion of the dialogue triggers the clearing of the circuit connection with 3G_MSC-A, if any, of the
Radio Resources on the Iu-Interface and the release of the SCCP connection between 3G_MSC-B and
RNS-B. The clearing of the Radio Resources (the clearing indication received from RNS-B is transmitted
to 3G_MSC-A) or the loss of the SCCP connection between 3G_MSC-B and RNS-B, triggers in
3G_MSC-B the abortion of the dialogue on the E-Interface and the clearing of the circuit connection with
3G_MSC-A, if any.
4.8.5 Processing in 3G_MSC-B, and information transfer on E-interface

3G_MSC-B. The relevant RANAP procedures are mentioned to ease the comprehension, their detailed description is
the scope of the TS 25.413. Each RANAP message being transferred on E-interface shall use the mechanisms given in
subclause 4.8.4 and is described in TS 25.413.
4.8.5.1 Integrity Protection Information

A sequence of possible integrity protection algorithms can be sent to an RNS in Security Mode Command or Relocation
Request. The RNS chooses one of the listed algorithms and reports this back to the 3G_MSC in Security Mode
Complete or Relocation Request Acknowledge respectively.
The list of algorithms, the integrity protection key and the chosen algorithm shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B.
ETSI
If integrity protection has not been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation, this will be controlled by 3G_MSC-
A after the completion of Inter-MSC Relocation.
Integrity protection control towards 3G_MSC-B:
If Integrity protection has been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation:
- in the Relocation Request RANAP message (information included).
The Relocation Request Acknowledge should in this case contain the indication of the chosen algorithm.
If Integrity protection has NOT been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation:
- in the Security Mode Command procedure between 3G_MSC-A and 3G_MSC-B.

A sequence of possible encryption algorithms can be sent to an RNS in Security Mode Command or Relocation
Request. The RNS chooses one of the listed algorithms and reports this back to the 3G_MSC in Security Mode
Complete or Relocation Request Acknowledge respectively.
The list of algorithms, the ciphering key and the chosen algorithm shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B, and the chosen value
sent to 3G_MSC-A.
If ciphering has not been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation, this will be controlled by 3G_MSC-A after
the completion of Inter-MSC Relocation.
If Ciphering has been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation:
- in the Relocation Request RANAP message (information included).
The Relocation Request Acknowledge should in this case contain the indication of the chosen algorithm.
If Ciphering has NOT been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation:
- in the Security Mode Command procedure between 3G_MSC-A and 3G_MSC-B.
4.8.5.3 RAB Parameters

The parameters shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B to be used at internal Relocation in 3G_MSC-B.
Received by 3G_MSC-B from 3G_MSC-A in:
− The Relocation Request RANAP message.
If a new type of resource is to be assigned after Inter-MSC Relocation, this can be made with:
− The RAB Assignment Request RANAP message.

Channel Type is GSM information that is required in BSSMAP Handover Request and BSSMAP Assignment Request,
and it shall be provided by 3G_MSC-A. 3G_MSC-B needs this information in case of an intra-MSC UMTS to GSM
handover after an inter-MSC relocation and subsequent assignment procedures. The Channel Type derived from the
Bearer Capability that is available in 3G_MSC-A. This mapping is described in 3GPP TS 27.001 [8]. Therefore
3G_MSC-A must provide this information in case of an inter-MSC relocation. The Radio Resource Information IE in
the MAP Prepare Handover message refers to the Channel Type GSM information.
ETSI
Channel Type shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B.
Received by 3G_MSC-B from 3G_MSC-A in:
− The Forward Access Signalling Request message.
4.8.5.5 Selected GSM Algorithm

After inter-MSC relocation, the 3G_MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. A sequence of possible
encryption algorithms, received from the 3G_MSC-A, can be sent to an BSS in Handover Request or in Cipher Mode
Command in case of cipher mode setting after intra.MSC-B handover from UMTS to GSM. The BSS chooses one of
the listed algorithms and reports this back to the 3G_MSC in Handover Request Acknowledge or Cipher Mode
Complete respectively. The MSC-B provides the Selected GSM algorithm information to the MSC-A. The Selected
GSM algorithms IE in the MAP Process Access Signalling Request message refers to the Algorithm identifier octet in
the Chosen Encryption Algorithm GSM information.
The chosen algorithm shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B, and sent to 3G_MSC-A.
If Ciphering has been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation, Selected GSM algorithm information is received
by 3G_MSC-A from 3G_MSC-B in:
− The Handover Performed BSSMAP message.
If Ciphering has NOT been performed before Intra-MSC-B handover from UMTS to GSM after Inter-MSC
Relocation, Selected GSM algorithm information is received by 3G_MSC-A from 3G_MSC-B in:
4.8.5.6 Allowed GSM Algorithms

Allowed GSM algorithms is GSM information that is required in BSSMAP Handover Request and BSSMAP Cipher
Mode Command, and shall be provided by 3G_MSC-A. 3G_MSC-B needs this information in case of an intra-MSC
UMTS to GSM handover and in subsequent ciphering mode setting, after an inter-MSC relocation. Therefore 3G_MSC-
A must provide this information in case of an inter-MSC relocation. The Allowed GSM algorithms IE in the MAP
Prepare Handover and in the MAP Forward Access Signalling Request messages refers to the Algorithm identifier octet
in the Permitted Algorithms GSM information.
Allowed GSM algorithms shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B.
If Ciphering has been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation:
If Ciphering has NOT been performed before Inter-MSC Relocation:
ETSI
4.8.5.7 Chosen Channel

BSSMAP Assignment Request may give the BSS some freedom in the selection of radio resource (for instance channel
rate selection, speech version selection etc.). Chosen Channel and/or Speech Version is reported back to 3G_MSC-B in
BSSMAP Assignment Complete. The Chosen Radio Resource Information IE in the MAP Prepare Handover Response
and Process Access Signalling Request messages refers to the Chosen Channel and/or Speech Version GSM
information.
The Channel Type and the characteristics of the chosen channel shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B, and the Chosen Channel
and/or Speech Version information elements shall be transferred to MSC-A or 3G_MSC-A.
Received by MSC-A or 3G_MSC-A from 3G_MSC-B in:
− The Prepare Handover Response MAP message
− The Process Access Signalling request MAP message

handover to GSM.
If a new assignment of a TCH after an inter-MSC relocation is to be performed, the BSSMAP Service Handover
and sent by 3G_MSC-B to the BSS in the Assignment Request BSSMAP message.

relocation or when 3G_MSC-B performs a subsequent intra-MSC relocation or handover to UMTS.
− the Relocation Request RANAP message.
If a new assignment of a Radio Access Bearer after an inter-MSC relocation is to be performed, the information
− the RANAP RAB Assignment procedure.
4.8.5.10 GERAN Classmark

The GERAN Classmark shall be stored by 3G_MSC-B and can be received from MSC-A, from the serving BSS or
serving RNS, or from the target RNS. The GERAN Classmark shall be used together with other parameters, e.g. the
Channel Type, for selecting a service and for generating RAB parameters for relocation to GERAN Iu-mode,
subsequent relocation or handover to GERAN Iu-mode, and RAB (re-)assignment when the MS is in GERAN Iu-mode.
Transfer of Information due to GERAN Classmark received from MSC-A:
ETSI
Transfer of Information due to GERAN Classmark received from the serving RNS:
- the Handover Required BSSMAP message;
- the Relocation Required RANAP message;
- the Initial UE RANAP message; or
- the RAB Assignment Response RANAP message.
Transfer of Information due to GERAN Classmark received from the target RNS:
- the Relocation Failure RANAP message.

- the Relocation Request RANAP message encapsulated in the Prepare Handover request MAP message.
4.8.5.12 UESBI
- the Relocation Request RANAP message.
4.8.5.13 Alternative RAB Parameters Value

The Alternative RAB Parameters Value information is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
- the Relocation Request RANAP message.
If an assignment of a Radio Access Bearer after an inter-MSC relocation is to be performed, the information is
transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
- the RAB Assignment Request RANAP message.

S, MGW, RNC or BSC.
ETSI
The Trace Parameter List information for MSC-S, MGW and BSC tracing is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
The Trace Propagation Parameter information for RNC tracing is transferred to 3G_MSC-B in:
- the CN Invoke Trace RANAP message.
4.8.6 Overview of the Technical Specifications 3GPP interworking for the

Inter-MSC Relocation
ETSI
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PSTN/ISDN ║
║ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ║
║ ▒ +---------------+ ▒ ║
║ ==============▒====== | ============= | =============== ▒ ║
║ UMTS ▒ | | ▒ ║
║ ▒ V V ▒ ║
║ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒ ║
║ ▒ RNS-A 3G-MSC-A 3G-MSC-B RNS-B ▒ MS ║
║ ▒ ▒ ║
║ ▒ +-------+ ▒ +-------+ ║
║ ▒ | C M | 24.008 ▒ | C M | ║
║ ▒ +-------|<------------------------------------>+-------| ║
║ ▒ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ | M M | ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒ | M M | ║
║ ▒ ░+------+25.413 +-------| 25.413+-------+ 25.413+-------+ ░▒ +-------| ║
║ ▒ ░| R R |<----->| R R |<=====>| R R |<----->| R R | ░▒ | R R | ║
║ ▒ ░+------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ ░▒ +-------+ ║
║ ▒ ░ Λ Λ Λ Λ ░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░ | | 29.010 | | ░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░ | V V | ░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░ |+-----+ 29.002+-----+| ░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░ ||MAP/E|<----->|MAP/E|| ░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░ |+-----+ +-----+| 23.009░▒ ║
║ ▒ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ | ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ | ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒ Remark: The RRC interface and ║
║ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ V ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ V ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ the link layer ║
║ +-----------------------+ protocols being out of ║
║ | T C A P | the scope of this ║
║ +-----------------------+ Specification are not ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ shown here. ║
║ | S C C P | ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ ║
║ | M T P | ║
║ +------------------------------------------------------+ ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETSI
4.9 Location Services

The general principles of the location services procedures are given in Technical Specification 3GPP TS 23.271 [16].
3GPP TS 29.010 gives the necessary information for interworking between the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7] RANAP protocol
and the 3GPP TS 48.008 [12] BSSMAP protocol. The interworking is necessary for positioning requests issued after a
completed GSM to UMTS inter system handover. BSSMAP messages carried by MAP over the E-interface must be
mapped by the non-anchor 3G-MSC into the corresponding RANAP messages to be sent over the Iu-interface and vice
versa. For Inter-MSC GSM to GSM Handover and Inter-MSC UMTS to UMTS SRNS Relocation no mapping between
the 3GPP TS 25.413 [7] RANAP protocol and the 3GPP TS 48.008 [12] BSSMAP protocol is necessary, but only the
interworking with the MAP protocol over the E-interface needs to be described.
4.9.1 Completed Location Acquisition
4.9.1.1 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to GSM)

After a successful Inter-MSC handover, any positioning request received by the anchor MSC via the MAP message
Provide Subscriber Location triggers the BSSMAP procedure Location Acquisition described in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12].
For handover this procedure is executed according to GSM 3GPP TS 49.008 [14] with the anchor MSC playing the role
of the MSC and the non anchor MSC playing the role of the BSS.
The needed BSSMAP signalling is sent over the E-interface encapsulated in the MAP messages Process Access
Signalling and Forward Access Signalling.
At the non anchor MSC the BSSMAP messages received from the anchor MSC are forwarded to the BSS, and the
BSSMAP messages received from the BSS are sent over the E-interface to the anchor MSC.
The signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure is shown in figures 65a.
ETSI
GMLC MSC-A MSC-B

| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
|-------------->|MAP FORWARD ACCESS |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | PERFORM LOCATION |
| | REQUEST) |
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | | PERFORM LOCATION |
| | | REQUEST |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |Positioning|
| | | | is |
| | | | performed |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |
| | | PERFORM LOCATION
| | | RESPONSE
| | |
| | MAP PROCESS ACCESS |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |<------------------------|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | RESPONSE) |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION res | |
|<--------------| |
| | |
Figure 65a: Signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure
After the inter-MSC handover, the MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. Any positioning request
received by the anchor MSC after completion of the intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover is handled as for Inter-MSC
Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.1.2).
4.9.1.2 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to UMTS)

After a successful Inter-MSC GSM to UMTS inter system handover, any positioning request received by the anchor
MSC via the MAP message Provide Subscriber Location triggers the BSSMAP procedure Location Acquisition
described in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12]. For handover this procedure is executed according to 3GPP TS 49.008 [14] with the
anchor MSC playing the role of the MSC and the non anchor 3G MSC playing the role of the BSS.
At the non anchor 3G MSC the BSSMAP messages received from the anchor MSC are mapped into the corresponding
RANAP messages to be sent to the RNS, and the received RANAP messages are mapped into the corresponding
BSSMAP messages to be sent over the E-interface to the anchor MSC.
The signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure is shown in figures 65b.
ETSI
GMLC MSC-A 3G-MSC-B

| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | REQUEST) |
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | | CONTROL |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |Positioning|
| | | | is |
| | | | performed |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| |MAP PROCESS ACCESS |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |<------------------------|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | RESPONSE) |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION res | |
|<--------------| |
| | |
Figure 65b: Signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure
The interworking between the BSSMAP location aquisition messages in MAP and the RANAP location reporting
messages is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIG. LOCATION REPORTING |
message | request CONTROL |
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| PERFORM LOCATION REQUEST) |
| |
| |
| Location Type Request Type | 1
| >Current Geographic >Event = Direct |
| Location >Report Area = |
| Geo. Coord. |
| |
| Cell Identifier ---- |
| Classmark Inf. Type3 ---- |
| LCS Client Type ---- |
| Chosen Channel ---- |
| LCS Priority ---- |
| LCS QoS Request Type |
| >Horizontal Accuracy >Accuracy Code |
| |
| GPS Assistance Data ---- |
| APDU ---- |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Result | MAP PROCESS ACCESS SIG. LOCATION REPORT |
| request |
| -an-APDU( |
| PERFORM LOCATION RESPONSE) |
| |
| |
| |
| Location Estimate Area Identity |
| >Geographical Area |
| Positioning Data ---- |
| Deciphering Keys ---- |
| LCS Cause Cause |
| ---- Request Type |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: All other Location Type possibilities are not supported by UMTS positioning
After the inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. Any
positioning request received by the anchor MSC after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover is handled
as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to GSM (see section 4.9.1.1).
4.9.1.3 Inter-MSC Handover (UMTS to GSM)

After a successful Inter-MSC UMTS to GSM inter system handover, any positioning request received by the anchor
3G-MSC via the MAP message Provide Subscriber Location triggers the BSSMAP procedure Location Acquisition
described in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12]. For handover this procedure is executed according to 3GPP TS 49.008 [14] with the
anchor 3G-MSC playing the role of the 3G-MSC and the non anchor MSC playing the role of the BSS.
At the non anchor MSC the BSSMAP messages received from the anchor 3G-MSC are forwarded to the BSS, and the
BSSMAP messages received from the BSS are sent over the E-interface to the anchor 3G-MSC.
The signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure is shown in figures 65c.
ETSI
GMLC 3G-MSC-A MSC-B

| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | REQUEST) |
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | | REQUEST |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |Positioning|
| | | | is |
| | | | performed |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |
| | | PERFORM LOCATION
| | | RESPONSE
| | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |<------------------------|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | RESPONSE) |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION res | |
|<--------------| |
| | |
Figure 65c: Signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure
After the inter-MSC UMTS to GSM handover, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. Any
positioning request received by the anchor 3G MSC after completion of the intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover is
handled as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.1.2).
4.9.1.4 Inter-MSC SRNS Relocation

After a successful Inter-MSC SRNS Relocation, any positioning request received by the anchor 3G-MSC via the MAP
message Provide Subscriber Location triggers the RANAP procedure Location Reporting Control described in TS
25.413. For handover this procedure is executed according to 23.009 with the anchor 3G-MSC playing the role of the
3G-MSC and the non anchor 3G-MSC playing the role of the RNS.
The needed RANAP signalling is sent over the E-interface encapsulated in the MAP messages Process Access
At the non anchor 3G-MSC the RANAP messages received from the anchor 3G-MSC are forwarded to the RNS, and
the RANAPmessages received from the RNS are sent over the E-interface to the anchor 3G-MSC.
The signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure is shown in figures 65d.
ETSI
GMLC 3G-MSC-A 3G-MSC-B

| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | LOCATION REPORTING |
| | CONTROL) |
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | | CONTROL |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |Positioning|
| | | | is |
| | | | performed |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |
| | |LOCATION REPORT
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |<------------------------|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | LOCATION REPORT) |
| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION res | |
|<--------------| |
| | |
Figure 65d: Signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure
After the inter-MSC SRNS Relocation, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. Any
positioning request received by the anchor 3G MSC after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to GSM requires that at
the non anchor 3G MSC the received RANAP messages are mapped into the corresponding BSSMAP messages to be
sent to the BSS, and the received BSSMAP messages are mapped into the corresponding RANAP messages to be sent
over the E-interface to the anchor 3G-MSC.
ETSI
The signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure is shown in figures 65e.
| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | CONTROL) |
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | |PERFORM LOCATION |
| | | REQUEST |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |Positioning|
| | | | is |
| | | | performed |
| | | +-----------+
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | |
| | |PERFORM LOCATION
| | | RESPONSE
| | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |<------------------------|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION res | |
|<--------------| |
| | |
Figure 65e: Signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure
the interworking between the RANAP messages encapsulated in MAP and the BSSMAP messages is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIG. PERFORM LOCATION |
message | request REQUEST |
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| LOCATION REPORTING CONTROL) |
| |
| |
| Request Type Location Type |
| >Event = Direct >Current Geographic |
| >Report Area = Location |
| Geo. Coord. |
| |
| Request Type LCS QoS |
| >Accuracy Code >Horizontal Accuracy |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Result | MAP PROCESS ACCESS SIG. PERFORM LOCATION |
| request RESPONSE |
| -an-APDU( |
| LOCATION REPORT) |
| |
| |
| Area Identity Location Estimate |
| >Geographical Area |
| |
| Cause LCS Cause |
| Request Type ---- |
| |

When a mobile station is handed over from GSM to GSM, no mapping of cause codes is required. The MSC shall use
the cause codes specified in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12].
After the inter-MSC handover, the MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. A mapping of the cause
codes used in the RANAP and the BSSMAP protocols is needed after completion of the intra-MSC GSM to UMTS
handover and is the same as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.2.2)..

When a Mobile Station is handed over between GSM and UMTS, a mapping of the cause codes used in the RANAP
and the BSSMAP protocols is needed. The mapping described here is applicable to the BSSMAP protocol even when
The mapping between the cause codes received in RANAP Location Report and the LCS cause codes sent in BSSMAP
Perform Location Response is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
25.413 48.008 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
LOCATION REPORT PERFORM LOCATION RESPONSE |
|
- Requested Report Type - Position method failure|
not Supported |
- Requested Information - Position method failure|
not Available |
- all other cause codes - System Failure |
ETSI
After the inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. No
mapping of cause codes is required after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover as for Inter-MSC
Handover GSM to GSM (see section 4.9.2.1).

When a mobile station is handed over from UMTS to GSM, no mapping of cause codes is required. The 3G-MSC shall
use the cause codes specified in 3GPP TS 48.008 [12].
After the inter-MSC UMTS to GSM handover, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. A
mapping of the cause codes used in the RANAP and the BSSMAP protocols is needed after completion of the intra-
MSC GSM to UMTS handover and is the same as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.2.2)...

When a mobile station is handed over from UMTS to UMTS, no mapping of cause codes is required. Both 3G-MSCs
shall use the cause codes specified in TS 25.413.
After the inter-MSC SRNS Relocation, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. A mapping of
the cause codes used in the RANAP and the BSSMAP protocols is needed after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to
GSM handover.
The mapping between the cause codes received in BSSMAP Perform Location Response and the LCS cause codes sent
in RANAP Location Report is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------
48.008 25.413 |Notes
-------------------------------------------------------┼--------
PERFORM LOCATION RESPONSE LOCATION REPORT |
|
- Position method failure - Requested Report Type |
not Supported |
- System Failure - Unspecified Failure |
- Protocol Error - Unspecified Failure |
- Data missing - Unspecified Failure |
in position request |
- Unexpected data value - Unspecified Failure |
in position request |
- Target MS Unreachable - Unspecified Failure |
- Location request aborted - Unspecified Failure |
- Facility not supported - Requested Report Type |
not Supported |
- Inter-BSC Handover Ongoing - Unspecified Failure |
- Intra-BSC - Unspecified Failure |
Handover Complete |
- Congestion - Unspecified Failure |
- Unspecified - Unspecified Failure |
4.9.3 Aborted Location Acquisition

When for any reason the on going location acquisition procedure needs to be aborted, the anchor MSC sends the
BSSMAP message Perform Location Abort over the E-interface.
Figure 66a shows the signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure.
ETSI
GMLC MSC-A MSC-B

| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | REQUEST) |
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |-------------------->|
| | | |
| | | REQUEST)|
| | | |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | PERFORM LOCATION ABORT)| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |-------------------->|
| | | |
| | | ABORT |
| | | |
| | |<--------------------|
| | | |
| | | RESPONSE |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | PERFORM LOCATION | |
| | RESPONSE) | |
Figure 66a: Signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure
After the inter-MSC handover, the MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. A positioning request that
needs to be aborted by the anchor MSC after completion of the intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover is handled as for
Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.3.2).

When for any reason the on going location acquisition procedure needs to be aborted, the anchor MSC sends the
Figure 66b shows the signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure.
ETSI
GMLC MSC-A 3G-MSC-B

| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | REQUEST) |
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | | CONTROL |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | CONTROL |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | RESPONSE) | |
Figure 66b: Signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure
The interworking between the BSSMAP location aquisition messages in MAP and the RANAP location reporting
messages is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIG. LOCATION REPORTING |
message | request CONTROL |
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| PERFORM LOCATION ABORT) |
| |
| |
| LCS Cause Request Type |
| >Event = Stop |
| >Report Area = |
| Geo. Coord. |
| |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
Result | MAP PROCESS ACCESS SIG. LOCATION REPORT |
| request | 1
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| ---- |
| LCS Cause Cause |
| ---- |
| |
NOTE 1: PERFORM LOCATION RESPONSE with LCS cause shall be generated by 3G-MSC-B.
After the inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. A
positioning request that needs to be aborted by the anchor MSC after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to GSM
handover is handled as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to GSM (see section 4.9.3.1).

When for any reason the on going location acquisition procedure needs to be aborted, the anchor 3G-MSC sends the
Figure 66c shows the signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure.
ETSI
GMLC 3G-MSC-A MSC-B

| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | REQUEST) |
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |-------------------->|
| | | |
| | | REQUEST)|
| | | |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |-------------------->|
| | | |
| | | ABORT |
| | | |
| | |<--------------------|
| | | RESPONSE |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | RESPONSE) | |
Figure 66c: Signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure
After the inter-MSC UMTS to GSM handover, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. A
positioning request that needs to be aborted by the anchor 3G MSC after completion of the intra-MSC GSM to UMTS
handover is handled as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.3.2)..

When for any reason the on going location acquisition procedure needs to be aborted, the anchor 3G-MSC sends the
RANAP message Location Reporting Control over the E-interface.
ETSI
Figure 66d shows the signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure.
| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | CONTROL) |
| | |
| | | RNS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |-------------------->|
| | | |
| | | LOCATION REPORTING |
| | | CONTROL |
| | | |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |------------------------>| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | LOCATION REPORTING | |
| | CONTROL = STOP) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |-------------------->|
| | | |
| | | LOCATION REPORTING |
| | | CONTROL = |
| | | STOP DIRECT |
| | | |
| | |<--------------------|
| | | |
| | | LOCATION REPORT |
| | | |
| | SIGNALLING | |
| |<------------------------| |
| | -an-APDU( | |
| | LOCATION REPORT) | |
| | | |
Figure 66d: Signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure
After the inter-MSC SRNS Relocation, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. A positioning
request that needs to be aborted by the anchor 3G MSC after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to GSM requires that
at the non anchor 3G MSC the received RANAP messages are mapped into the corresponding BSSMAP messages to be
ETSI
The signalling for a completed Location Acquisition procedure is shown in figures 65e.
| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |------------------------>|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | CONTROL) |
| | |
| | | BSS-B
| | | |
| | | |
| | |------------------>|
| | | |
| | | ABORT |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |<------------------|
| | | |
| | | RESPONSE |
| | |
| | SIGNALLING |
| |<------------------------|
| | -an-APDU( |
| | |
|MAP PROVIDE | |
|SUBSCRIBER | |
|LOCATION res | |
|<--------------| |
| | |
Figure 65e: Signalling for an aborted Location Acquisition procedure
the interworking between the RANAP messages encapsulated in MAP and the BSSMAP messages is as follows:
ETSI
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
message | request ABORT |
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| LOCATION REPORTING CONTROL) |
| |
| |
| Request Type LCS Cause |
| >Event = Stop Direct > Location request |
| >Report Area = aborted |
| Geo. Coord. |
| |
--------┼-------------------------------------------------┼-----
| -an-APDU( |
| LOCATION REPORT) |
| |
| |
| Cause LCS Cause |
| >Unspecified > Location request |
| Failure aborted |
| |
4.9.4 Request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys: Successful Case

After a successful Inter-MSC handover, any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received by the non
anchor MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is forwarded to the anchor MSC by encapsulating the DTAP message
into the MAP messages Process Access Signalling. The anchor MSC triggers the BSSMAP procedure Location
Acquisition described in 3G TS 48.008. For handover this procedure is executed according to 3G TS 49.008 with the
anchor MSC playing the role of the MSC and the non anchor MSC playing the role of the BSS.
At the non anchor MSC the BSSMAP messages received from the anchor MSC are forwarded to the BSS, and the
BSSMAP messages received from the BSS are sent over the E-interface to the anchor MSC.
Once the BSSMAP procedure has been completed, the anchor MSC sends the DTAP message LCS-MOLR Response
encapsulated in the MAP message Forward Access Signalling to the non anchor MSC, which relays it to the MS.
The signalling for a completed request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys is shown in figures 67a.
ETSI
MSC-A MSC-B MS
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
|MAP PROCESS ACCESS | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| -an-APDU(LCS-MOLR) | |
| | |
| | |
|MAP FORWARD ACCESS | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| PERFORM LOCATION | |
| REQUEST) | BSS-B |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | REQUEST | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | If Assistance Data were|
| | | requested then |
| | | Delivery of Assistance |
| | | Data to MS |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | RESPONSE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|MAP PROCESS ACCESS | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| PERFORM LOCATION | | |
| RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|MAP FORWARD ACCESS | | |
| SIGNALLING | -+- |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| LCS-MOLR Response) | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR Response |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 67a: Signalling for the request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
After the inter-MSC handover, the MSC-B can perform intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover. Any request for
Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received after completion of the intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover is handled
as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.4.2).

After a successful Inter-MSC GSM to UMTS inter system handover, any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering
keys received by the non-anchor 3G MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is forwarded to the anchor MSC by
encapsulating the DTAP message into the MAP messages Process Access Signalling. The anchor MSC triggers the
BSSMAP procedure Location Acquisition described in 3G TS 48.008. For handover this procedure is executed
according to 3G TS 49.008 with the anchor MSC playing the role of the MSC and the non anchor 3G MSC playing the
role of the BSS.
ETSI
At the non-anchor 3G MSC the received BSSMAP messages are mapped into the corresponding RANAP messages to
be sent to the RNS, and the received RANAP messages are mapped into the corresponding BSSMAP messages to be
sent over the E-interface to the anchor MSC.
Once the BSSMAP procedure has been completed, the anchor MSC sends the DTAP message LCS-MOLR Response
encapsulated in the MAP message Forward Access Signalling to the non anchor 3G MSC, which relays it to the UE.
The signalling for a completed request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys is shown in figures 67b.
MSC-A 3G MSC-B UE
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| REQUEST) | RNS-B |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| |LOCATION RELATED | |
| | DATA REQUEST | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | Data to UE |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | DATA RESPONSE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 67b: Signalling for the request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
When the UE requires the delivery of Assistance Data for the GPS Assisted positioning method, the interworking
between the BSSMAP messages encapsulated in MAP and the RANAP messages is as follows:
ETSI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIG. LOCATION RELATED |
message | request DATA REQUEST |
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| Location Type. Requested Location |
| Location.Information Related Data Type |
| > location assistance >Dedicated Assistance |
| info for target MS Data for Assisted GPS|
| Location Type. |
| Positioning Method | 1
| > Assisted GPS |
| |
| |
| GPS Assistance Data Requested GPS |
| Assistance Data |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
Result | MAP PROCESS ACCESS SIG. LOCATION RELATED |
| request DATA RESPONSE |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| BSSMAP information RANAP information | 2
| |
| |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: All other Positioning Method possibilities are not supported by UMTS when Location Information is
"location assistance information for the target MS".
NOTE 2: The absence of the Cause IE in the RANAP message Location Related Data Response is an indication
that the requested assistance data has been successfully delivered to the UE..
If the UE requires the delivery of Assistance Data for an UMTS specific method, then the anchor MSC cannot forward
the request to the non anchor 3G MSC, and replies with the error "System"to the LCS-MOLR message.
If the anchor MSC sends a request for assistance data for a GSM specific method in BSSMAP Perform Location
Request encapsulated in MAP Forward Access Signalling, then the non anchor 3G MSC replies immediately by
generating and encapsulating BSSMAP Perform Location Response with Cause "System Failure" in MAP Process
Access Signalling. This traffic case can happen if an LCS-MOLR had been received in the anchor MSC before the
initiation of the handover procedure.
When the UE requires the delivery of De-ciphering Keys for the GPS Assisted positioning method, the interworking
ETSI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | MAP FORWARD ACCESS SIG. LOCATION RELATED |
message | request DATA REQUEST |
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| Location Type. Requested Location |
| Location.Information Related Data Type |
| > deciphering keys > Deciphering Keys |
| for broadcast for Assisted GPS |
| assistance data |
| for the target MS |
| Location Type. |
| Positioning Method | 1
| > Assisted GPS |
| |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| request DATA RESPONSE |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| Deciphering Keys Broadcast Assistance |
| Data Deciphering Keys|
| |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: All other Positioning Method possibilities are not supported by UMTS when Location Information is
"deciphering keys for broadcast assistance data for the target MS".
If the UE requires the delivery of De-ciphering Keys for an UMTS specific method, then the anchor MSC cannot
forward the request to the non anchor 3G MSC, and replies with the error "System"to the LCS-MOLR message.
If the anchor MSC sends a request for De-ciphering Keys for a GSM specific method in BSSMAP Perform Location
Request encapsulated in MAP Forward Access Signalling, then the non anchor 3G MSC replies immediately by
generating and encapsulating BSSMAP Perform Location Response with Cause "System Failure" in MAP Process
initiation of the handover procedure.
request for Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover
is handled as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to GSM (see section 4.9.4.1).

After a successful Inter-MSC UMTS to GSM inter system handover, any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering
keys received by the non-anchor MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is forwarded to the anchor 3G MSC by
encapsulating the DTAP message into the MAP messages Process Access Signalling. The anchor 3G MSC triggers the
BSSMAP procedure Location Acquisition described in 3G TS 48.008. For handover this procedure is executed
according to 3G TS 49.008 with the anchor 3G MSC playing the role of the MSC and the non-anchor MSC playing the
role of the BSS.
At the non-anchor MSC the BSSMAP messages received from the anchor 3G MSC are forwarded to the BSS, and the
BSSMAP messages received from the BSS are sent over the E-interface to the anchor 3G MSC.
Once the BSSMAP procedure has been completed, the anchor 3G MSC sends the DTAP message LCS-MOLR
Response encapsulated in the MAP message Forward Access Signalling to the non-anchor MSC, which relays it to the
UE.
ETSI
The signalling for a completed request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys is shown in figures 67c.
3G MSC-A MSC-B MS
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | REQUEST | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | Data to MS |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | RESPONSE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 67c: Signalling for the request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
request for Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received after completion of the intra-MSC GSM to UMTS handover
is handled as for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section 4.9.4.2)..

After a successful Inter-MSC SRNS Relocation , any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received by the
non anchor 3G MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is forwarded to the anchor 3G MSC by encapsulating the
DTAP message into the MAP messages Process Access Signalling. The anchor 3G MSC triggers the RANAP
procedure Location Related Data described in TS 25.413. For handover this procedure is executed according to 23.009
with the anchor 3G-MSC playing the role of the 3G-MSC and the non anchor 3G-MSC playing the role of the RNS.
ETSI
The needed RANAP signalling is sent over the E-interface encapsulated in the MAP messages Process Access
At the non anchor 3G MSC the RANAP messages received from the anchor 3G MSC are forwarded to the RNS, and
the RANAP messages received from the RNS are sent over the E-interface to the anchor 3G MSC.
Once the RANAP procedure has been completed, the anchor 3G MSC sends the DTAP message LCS-MOLR Response
encapsulated in the MAP message Forward Access Signalling to the non anchor 3G MSC, which relays it to the UE.
The signalling for a completed request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys is shown in figures 67d.
3G MSC-A 3G MSC-B UE
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| LOCATION RELATED | |
| DATA REQUEST) | RNS-B |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | LOCATION RELATED | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | Data to UE |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | DATA RESPONSE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| LOCATION RELATED | | |
| DATA RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 67d: Signalling for the request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
After the inter-MSC SRNS Relocation, the 3G MSC-B can perform intra-MSC UMTS to GSM handover. Any request
for Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received after completion of the intra-MSC UMTS to GSM requires that at
ETSI
over the E-interface to the anchor 3G-MSC. The signalling for a completed request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering
Keys in this traffic case is shown in figures 67e.
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| DATA REQUEST) | BSS-B |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | REQUEST | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | Data to MS |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | RESPONSE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| DATA RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 67e: Signalling for the request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
between the RANAP messages encapsulated in MAP and the BSSMAP messages is as follows:
ETSI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| LOCATION RELATED |
| DATA REQUEST) |
| |
| |
| Requested Location Location Type. |
| Related Data Type Location Information |
| > Dedicated Assistance > location assistance | 1
| Data for Assisted info for target MS |
| GPS Location Type. |
| Positioning Method |
| > Assisted GPS |
| |
| Requested GPS GPS Assistance Data |
| Assistance Data |
| |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| -an-APDU( |
| DATA RESPONSE) |
| |
| RANAP information BSSMAP information | 2
| |
| |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: All other Positioning Method possibilities are not supported by GSM when Location Information is
NOTE 2: The absence of the Cause IE in the BSSMAP message Perform Location Response is an indicatioin that
the requested assistance data has been successfully delivered to the UE..
If the UE requires the delivery of Assistance Data for a GSM specific method, then the anchor 3G-MSC cannot
If the anchor 3G MSC sends a request for Assistance Data for an UMTS specific method in RANAP Location Related
Data Request encapsulated in MAP Forward Access Signalling, then the non anchor 3G MSC replies immediately by
generating and encapsulating RANAP Location Related Data Failure with Cause "Unspecified Failure" in MAP Process
initiation of the intra-MSC handover procedure.
ETSI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| |
| -an-APDU( |
| DATA REQUEST) |
| |
| |
| Requested Location Location Type. |
| Related Data Type Location Information |
| > Deciphering Keys > deciphering keys | 1
| for Assisted GPS for broadcast |
| assistance data |
| for the target MS |
| Location Type. |
| Positioning Method |
| > Assisted GPS |
| |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| -an-APDU( |
| DATA RESPONSE) |
| |
| |
| Broadcast Assistance Deciphering Keys |
| Data Deciphering Keys |
| |
| |
| |
NOTE 1: All other Positioning Method possibilities are not supported by GSM when Location Information is
If the UE requires the delivery of De-ciphering Keys for a GSM specific method, then the anchor 3G-MSC cannot
If the anchor 3G MSC sends a request for De-ciphering Keys for an UMTS specific method in RANAP Location
Related Data Request encapsulated in MAP Forward Access Signalling, then the non anchor 3G MSC replies
immediately by generating and encapsulating RANAP Location Related Data Failure with Cause "Unspecified Failure"
in MAP Process Access Signalling. This traffic case can happen if an LCS-MOLR had been received in the anchor
MSC before the initiation of the intra-MSC handover procedure.
4.9.5 Request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys: Failure Case

anchor MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is handled as described in section 4.9.4.1.
If the request fails, either because the BSS-B cannot return the requested De-ciphering Keys to the anchor MSC or
cannot deliver the required Assistance Data to the MS, the signalling is the same as for the successful case and is shown
in figure 67a.
If the request fails the signalling is the same as for the failure case for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section
4.9.5.2)
ETSI

After a successful Inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover, any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received
by the non anchor 3G MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is handled as described in section 4.9.4.2.
If the request fails, either because BSS-B cannot return the requested De-ciphering Keys to the anchor MSC or because
BSS-B cannot deliver the required Assistance Data to the MS, the signalling is as shown in figure 68a.
MSC-A 3G MSC-B UE
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | Data to UE |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | DATA FAILURE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 68a: Signalling for a failed request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
When the delivery to the UE of Assistance Data for the GPS Assisted positioning method fails, the interworking
ETSI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | |
message | "For the forward messages please refer to the |
| corresponding table in section 4.9.4.2" |
| |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| request DATA FAILURE |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| LCS Cause Cause |
| > System Failure > Dedicated Assistance|
| Data Not Available |
| |
| |
When the RNS-B cannot satisfy the request for De-ciphering Keys, the interworking between the BSSMAP messages
encapsulated in MAP and the RANAP messages is as follows:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 25.413 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | |
| |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| request DATA FAILURE |
| -an-APDU( |
| |
| |
| LCS Cause Cause |
| > System Failure > Deciphering Keys |
| Not Available |
| |
If the request fails the signalling is the same as for the failure case for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to GSM (see section
4.9.5.1)

After a successful Inter-MSC UMTS to GSM handover, any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received
by the non anchor MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is handled as described in section 4.9.4.3.
If the request fails, either because the BSS-B cannot return the requested De-ciphering Keys to the anchor 3G MSC or
BSS-B cannot deliver the required Assistance Data to the MS, the signalling is the same as for the successful case and is
shown in figure 67c.
If the request fails the signalling is the same as for the failure case for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see section
4.9.5.2)
ETSI

non anchor 3G MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is handled as described in section 4.9.4.4.
If the request fails, either because the RNS-B cannot return the requested De-ciphering Keys to the anchor 3G MSC or
RNS-B cannot deliver the required Assistance Data to the MS, the signalling is shown in figure 68b.
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| DATA REQUEST) | RNS-B |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | Data to UE |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | DATA FAILURE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| DATA FAILURE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 68b: Signalling for the request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
ETSI
If the request fails, either because the BSS-B cannot return the requested De-ciphering Keys to the anchor 3G MSC or
BSS-B cannot deliver the required Assistance Data to the MS, the signalling is as shown in figure 68c.
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| DATA REQUEST) | BSS-B |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | REQUEST | |
| | | |
| | +------------------------+
| | | Data to MS |
| | +------------------------+
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | RESPONSE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| DATA FAILURE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 68c: Signalling for the request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
ETSI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | |
| |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| -an-APDU( |
| DATA FAILURE) |
| |
| |
| Cause LCS Cause |
| > Dedicated Assistance > <any value> |
| Data Not Available |
| |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| 29.002 48.008 |Notes
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
Forward | |
| |
--------┼--------------------------------------------------┼-----
| -an-APDU( |
| DATA FAILURE) |
| |
| |
| Cause LCS Cause |
| > Deciphering Keys > <any value> |
| Not Available |
4.9.6 Abort of Request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys:

anchor MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is handled as described in section 4.9.4.1.
If the request is aborted by the anchor MSC the signalling is as shown in figure 69a.
ETSI
MSC-A MSC-B MS
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | REQUEST | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|-------------------->| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| ABORT) | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | ABORT | |
| | | |
| |<-----------------| |
| | | |
| | RESPONSE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 69a: Signalling for the abortion of a request for Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
If the request is aborted the signalling is the same as for the abortion case for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see
section 4.9.6.2)
ETSI

After a successful Inter-MSC GSM to UMTS handover, any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received
If the request is aborted by the anchor MSC the signalling is as shown in figure 69b.
MSC-A 3G MSC-B UE
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LCS-MOLR |
| |<--------------------------------------|
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|<--------------------| |
| | |
| | |
| SIGNALLING | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| | | |
| |----------------->| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|-------------------->| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| ABORT) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SIGNALLING | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| -an-APDU( | | |
| RESPONSE) | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|-------------------->| |
| -an-APDU( | |
| | |
| |-------------------------------------->|
| | |
Figure 69b: Signalling for the abortion of the request for Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys
There"s no interworking between the BSSMAP Perform Location Abort and any RANAP message since it is not
possible to abort a request for Assistance Data or De-ciphering Keys with RANAP. The BSSMAP message Perform
Location Response is generated by the non-anchor 3G MSC.
If the request is aborted the signalling is the same as for the abortion case for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to GSM (see
section 4.9.6.1)
ETSI

After a successful Inter-MSC UMTS to GSM handover, any request of Assistance Data or De-ciphering keys received
If the request is aborted by the anchor 3G MSC the signalling is the same as for the abortion for Inter-MSC GSM to
GSM handover abd is shown in figure 69a.
If the request is aborted the signalling is the same as for the abortion case for Inter-MSC Handover GSM to UMTS (see
section 4.9.6.2)

non anchor 3G MSC via the DTAP message LCS-MOLR is handled as described in section 4.9.4.4.
The request cannot be aborted by the 3G anchor MSC since RANAP does not support abortion of a request for
Assistance Data or De-Ciphering Keys.
4.10 Single Radio Voice Call Continuity (SRVCC)

4.10.1 General
The general principles of the SRVCC handover procedures are specified in 3GPP TS 23.009 [2]. This clause provides a
detailed specification for the interworking performed by the MSC Server enhanced for SRVCC. It defines in particular
the encoding of RANAP and BSSMAP cause values to avoid different encodings in different implementations.
4.10.2 SRVCC Handover from UTRAN (HSPA) to GERAN

Encoding of the cause code sent in BSSMAP Handover Request:
When it receives the SRVCC PS to CS Request message from the SGSN (see 3GPP TS 29.280 [25]), the MSC Server
enhanced for SRVCC shall set the BSSMAP Cause to the value 'Uplink quality' in the Handover Request message.
4.10.3 SRVCC Handover from UTRAN (HSPA) to UTRAN

Encoding of the cause code sent in RANAP Relocation Request:
When it receives the SRVCC PS to CS Request message from the SGSN (see 3GPP TS 29.280 [y]), the MSC Server
enhanced for SRVCC shall set the RANAP Cause to the value 'Time critical Relocation ' in the Relocation Request
message.
4.10.4 SRVCC Handover from E-UTRAN to GERAN

Encoding of the cause code sent in BSSMAP Handover Request:
When it receives the SRVCC PS to CS Request message from the MME (see 3GPP TS 29.280 [25]), the MSC Server
enhanced for SRVCC shall set the BSSMAP Cause to the value 'Uplink quality' in the Handover Request message.
4.10.5 SRVCC Handover from E-UTRAN to UTRAN

Encoding of the cause code sent in RANAP Relocation Request:
ETSI
When it receives the SRVCC PS to CS Request message from the MME (see 3GPP TS 29.280 [25]), the MSC Server
enhanced for SRVCC shall set the RANAP Cause to the value 'Time critical Relocation ' in the Relocation Request
message.
5 Interworking in the MME
5.1 General
This subclause provides a detailed specification for the interworking performed by the MME.
5.2 Void
5.3 Interworking between RANAP protocol messages and

S1AP protocol messages
This subclause defines a mapping of RANAP and S1AP cause values used in connection with inter RAT Handover to
avoid different mappings in different implementations.
Inter RAT Handover from UTRAN to LTE:
Table 5.3.1 defines a cause value mapping performed by the MME when the MME receives the Forward Relocation
Request message from the S4-SGSN.
Table 5.3.1: Cause value mapping from RANAP Cause to S1AP Cause
25.413 [7] 36.413 [21]

RELOCATION REQUIRED (RANAP Cause) HANDOVER REQUEST (S1AP Cause)
Group Value Group Value
Radio Network Layer Time critical Radio Network Layer Time critical handover
Cause Relocation Cause
Radio Network Layer Resource Optimisation Radio Network Layer Resource optimisation
Cause Relocation Cause handover
Radio Network Layer Reduce Load in Radio Network Layer Reduce load in serving cell
Cause Serving Cell Cause
Any other value Radio Network Layer Handover Desirable for

Cause Radio Reasons
For inter RAT handover from UTRAN served by Gn/Gp-SGSN to LTE, the MME maps the RANAP cause in the
GTPv1 Forward Relocation Request message to an S1AP cause as per Table 5.3.1. The MME sends this S1AP cause in
the S1AP Handover Request message to the eNodeB.
For inter RAT handover from UTRAN served by Gn/Gp-SGSN to LTE, if the handover fails in the LTE access, the
MME maps the S1AP cause in the S1AP Handover Failure message to a RANAP cause by using the mapping in Table
6.2.1. The MME uses the RANAP cause in the GTPv1 Forward Relocation Response message to the Gn/Gp-SGSN.
Inter RAT Handover from LTE to UTRAN:
The table 5.3.2 defines a cause value mapping performed by the MME when the MME receives the Forward Relocation
Response message from the S4-SGSN. This mapping is only needed if the inter RAT Handover failed in UTRAN.
ETSI
Table 5.3.2: Cause value mapping from RANAP Cause to S1AP Cause for failure case
25.413 [7] 36.413 [21]

RELOCATION FAILURE (RANAP Cause) HANDOVER PREPARATION FAILURE (S1AP
Cause)
Radio Network Layer No Radio Resources Radio Network Layer No Radio Resources
Cause Available in Target Cause Available in Target Cell
Cell
Radio Network Layer Requested Ciphering Radio Network Layer Encryption and/or integrity
Cause and/or Integrity Cause protection algorithms not
Protection algorithms supported
not supported
Radio Network Layer Traffic Load In The Radio Network Layer No Radio Resources
Cause Target Cell Higher Cause Available in Target Cell
Than In The Source
Cell
Miscellaneous Cause O&M Intervention Miscellaneous Cause O&M Intervention
Any other value Radio Network Layer Handover Failure In Target

Cause EPC/eNB Or Target
System
For inter RAT handover from LTE to UTRAN served by Gn/Gp-SGSN, the MME maps the S1AP cause in S1AP
Handover Required message to a RANAP cause by using the mapping in Table 6.2.2. The MME uses this RANAP
cause in the GTPv1 Forward Relocation Request message to the Gn/Gp-SGSN.
For inter RAT handover from LTE to UTRAN served by Gn/Gp-SGSN, if the handover fails in the UTRAN access, the
MME maps the RANAP cause received in the GTPv1 Forward Relocation Response message to an S1AP cause as per
Table 5.3.2. The MME sends this S1AP cause in the S1AP Handover Preparation Failure message to the eNodeB.
5.4 Interworking between BSSGP protocol messages and

This subclause defines a mapping of BSSGP and S1AP cause values used in connection with inter RAT Handover to
Inter RAT Handover from GERAN to LTE:
Table 5.4.1 defines a cause value mapping performed by the MME when the MME receives the GTPv2 Forward
Relocation Request message from the S4-SGSN or the GTPv1 Forward Relocation Request message from Gn/Gp-
SGSN (as per Annex D of 3GPP TS 23.401[22]).
NOTE1: The mapping in Table 5.4.1 has been derived based on Table 15.1 in 3GPP TS 29.060 [23] and Table
5.3.1 in this specification.
Table 5.4.1: Cause value mapping from BSSGP Cause to S1AP Cause
48.018 [24] 36.413 [21]

PS HANDOVER REQUIRED (BSSGP Cause) HANDOVER REQUEST (S1AP Cause)
Value Group Value
Uplink quality Radio Network Layer Time critical handover
Cause
Uplink strength Radio Network Layer Time critical handover
ETSI
Cause
Downlink quality Radio Network Layer Time critical handover

Cause
Downlink strength Radio Network Layer Time critical handover

Cause
Distance Radio Network Layer Time critical handover

Cause
Traffic Radio Network Layer Resource optimisation

Cause handover
Cell traffic congestion Radio Network Layer Reduce load in serving cell
Cause
Any other value Radio Network Layer Handover Desirable for

Cause Radio Reasons
For inter RAT handover from GERAN served by Gn/Gp-SGSN to LTE, if the handover fails in the LTE access, the
MME maps the S1AP cause in S1AP Handover Failure message to a RANAP cause by using the mapping in Table
6.2.1. The MME uses the RANAP cause in the GTPv1 Forward Relocation Response message to the Gn/Gp-SGSN.
The Gn-Gp/SGSN maps the RANAP cause to a BSSGP cause as per Table 15.2 in 3GPP TS 29.060 [23] and sends this
BSSGP cause in the BSSGP PS Handover Required Nack message.
Inter RAT Handover from LTE to GERAN:
Table 5.x.2 defines a cause value mapping performed by the MME when the MME receives the GTPv2 Forward
Relocation Response message from the S4-SGSN or the GTPv1Forward Relocation Response message from the
Gn/Gp-SGSN (as per Annex D of 3GPP TS 23.401[22]). This mapping is only needed if the inter RAT Handover failed
in GERAN.
NOTE2: The mapping in Table 5.4.2 has been derived based on Table 15.4 in 3GPP TS 29.060 [23] and Table
5.3.2 in this specification.
Table 5.4.2: Cause value mapping from BSSGP Cause to S1AP Cause for failure case
48.018 [24] 36.413 [21]

PS HANDOVER REQUEST NACK HANDOVER PREPARATION FAILURE
(BSSGP Cause) (S1AP Cause)
Value Group Value
Cell traffic congestion Radio Network Layer No Radio Resources
Cause Available in Target Cell
O&M intervention Miscellaneous Cause O&M Intervention
Any other value Radio Network Layer Handover Failure In Target

Cause EPC/eNB Or Target
System
For inter RAT handover from LTE to GERAN served by Gn/Gp-SGSN, the MME maps the S1AP cause in S1AP
Handover Required message to a RANAP cause by using the mapping in Table 6.2.2. The MME uses the RANAP
cause in the GTPv1 Forward Relocation Request message to the Gn/Gp-SGSN. The Gn-Gp/SGSN maps the RANAP
cause to a BSSGP cause as per Table 15.3 in 3GPP TS 29.060 [23] and sends this BSSGP cause in the BSSGP PS
Handover Request message.
ETSI
6 Interworking in the S4-SGSN
6.1 General
This subclause provides a detailed specification for the interworking performed by the S4-SGSN.
6.2 Interworking between RANAP protocol messages and

This subclause defines a mapping of RANAP and S1AP cause values used in connection with inter RAT Handover to
Inter RAT Handover from UTRAN to LTE:
The table 6.2.1 defines a cause value mapping performed by the S4-SGSN when the S4-SGSN receives the Forward
Relocation Response message from the MME. This mapping is only needed if the inter RAT Handover failed in LTE.
Table 6.2.1: Cause value mapping from S1AP Cause to RANAP Cause for failure case
36.413 [21] 25.413 [7]

HANDOVER FAILURE (S1AP Cause) RELOCATION PREPARATION FAILURE (RANAP
Cause)
Radio Network Layer No Radio Resources Radio Network Layer No Radio Resources
Cause Available in Target Cause Available in Target Cell
Cell
Radio Network Layer Encryption and/or Radio Network Layer Requested Ciphering
Cause integrity protection Cause and/or Integrity Protection
algorithms not algorithms not supported
supported
Miscellaneous Cause O&M Intervention Miscellaneous Cause O&M Intervention
Any other value Radio Network Layer Relocation Failure in

Cause Target CN/RNC or Target
System
Inter RAT Handover from LTE to UTRAN:
Table 6.2.2 defines a cause value mapping performed by the S4-SGSN when the S4-SGSN receives the Forward
Relocation Request message from the MME.
Table 6.2.2: Cause value mapping from S1AP Cause to RANAP Cause
36.413 [21] 25.413 [7]

HANDOVER REQUIRED (S1AP Cause) RELOCATION REQUEST (RANAP Cause)
Radio Network Layer Handover Desirable for Radio Network Layer Relocation Desirable for
Cause Radio Reasons Cause Radio Reasons
Radio Network Layer Time Critical Radio Network Layer Time critical Relocation
Cause Handover Cause
Radio Network Layer Reduce Load in Radio Network Layer Reduce Load in Serving
Cause Serving Cell Cause Cell
Any other value Radio Network Layer Resource Optimized
ETSI
Cause Relocation

This subclause defines a mapping of BSSGP and S1AP cause values used in connection with inter RAT Handover to
Inter RAT Handover from GERAN to LTE:
Table 6.3.1 defines a cause value mapping performed by the S4-SGSN when the S4-SGSN receives the GTPv2 Forward
Relocation Response message from the MME.
NOTE1: The mapping in Table 6.y.1 has been derived based on Table 6.2.1 in this specification and Table 15.2 in
3GPP TS 29.060 [23].
Table 6.3.1: Cause value mapping from S1AP Cause to BSSGP Cause for failure case
36.413 [21] 48.018 [24]

HANDOVER FAILURE (S1AP Cause) PS HANDOVER REQUIRED NACK (BSSGP Cause)
Group Value Value
Radio Network Layer No Radio Resources Cell traffic congestion
Cause Available in Target
Cell
Radio Network Layer Encryption and/or Requested ciphering and/or integrity protection
Cause integrity protection algorithms not supported
algorithms not
supported
Miscellaneous Cause O&M Intervention O&M Intervention
Any other value Relocation failure in target system
Inter RAT Handover from LTE to GERAN:
Table 6.3.2 defines a cause value mapping performed by the S4-SGSN when the S4-SGSN receives the GTPv2 Forward
Relocation Request message from the MME.
NOTE2: The mapping in Table 6.y.2 has been derived based on Table 6.2.2 in this specification and Table 15.3 in
3GPP TS 29.060 [23].
Table 6.3.2: Cause value mapping from S1AP Cause to BSSGP Cause
36.413 [21] 48.018 [24]

HANDOVER REQUIRED (S1AP Cause) PS HANDOVER REQUEST (BSSGP Cause)
Group Value Value
Radio Network Layer Handover Desirable for Better cell
Cause Radio Reasons
Radio Network Layer Time Critical Time critical relocation

Cause Handover
Radio Network Layer Reduce Load in Cell traffic congestion
ETSI
Cause Serving Cell
Any other value Traffic

RANAP protocol messages
For the mapping of BSSGP and RANAP cause values used in connection with inter RAT Handover between GERAN
and UTRAN, the mapping tables in Section 15 in 3GPP TS 29.060 [23] applies. The mapping is performed by the
target S4-SGSN.
ETSI
Annex A (informative):
Change history
Change history
TSG CN# Spec Version CR <Phase> New Version Subject/Comment
Sept 1999 GSM 09.10 7.0.0 Transferred to 3GPP CN
CN#04 29.010 R99 3.0.0 Approved by mail exploder at CN#04
CN#06 29.010 3.0.0 001 R99 3.1.0 UMTS / GSM Interworking
CN#06 29.010 3.0.0 002 R99 3.1.0 Addition of LSA Information message
CN#07 29.010 3.1.0 003r1 R99 3.2.0 UMTS / GSM Interworking
CN#07 29.010 3.1.0 004r1 R99 3.2.0 GSM / UMTS Interworking
CN#07 29.010 3.1.0 005 R99 3.2.0 UMTS/UMTS Handover
CN#09 29.010 3.2.0 006r1 R99 3.3.0 Clarification of use of Radio Resource
Information
CN#09 29.010 3.2.0 007r1 R99 3.3.0 Corrections and updates to align with current
R99 specs
CN#10 29.010 3.3.0 008 R99 3.4.0 GSM to 3G Handover: Location Reporting in
3G_MSC-B
CN#10 29.010 3.3.0 009 R99 3.4.0 GSM to 3G Handover: Chosen IEs in
Handover Request Ack
CN#10 29.010 3.3.0 010 R99 3.4.0 GSM to 3G Handover: MAP parameter Target
Cell ID
CN#10 29.010 3.3.0 011r1 R99 3.4.0 GSM/UMTS Interworking: Mapping of cause
codes
CN#11 29.010 3.4.0 012 R99 3.5.0 GSM to UMTS handover: addition of MAP
parameter Target RNC ID
CN#11 29.010 3.4.0 013 R99 3.5.0 Inter MSC relocation: addition of MAP
parameter Target RNC ID
CN#11 29.010 3.4.0 014 R99 3.5.0 Roaming restrictions for GPRS service
CN#11 29.010 3.4.0 015 R99 3.5.0 Alignment of cause mapping for 08.08 and
25.413 (Directed Retry)
CN#11 29.010 3.4.0 016 R99 3.5.0 UMTS to GSM Directed Retry cause code
mapping
CN#11 29.010 3.4.0 017 R99 3.5.0 Mapping of unknown HLR error to access
interface cause code
CN#11 29.010 3.5.0 Rel-4 4.0.0 Version increased from R99 to Rel-4
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 020r1 Rel-4 4.1.0 Addition of selected UMTS algorithm
indication to the handover procedures
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 022r1 Rel-4 4.1.0 Addition of selected GSM algorithm indication
to the handover procedures
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 024r1 Rel-4 4.1.0 Addition of allowed UMTS algorithms
indication to the handover procedures
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 026r1 Rel-4 4.1.0 Addition of allowed GSM algorithms indication
to the handover procedures
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 028r1 Rel-4 4.1.0 Addition of GSM channel type and GSM
chosen channel indications to handover
procedures
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 030 Rel-4 4.1.0 Partial Roaming – restriction by Location area
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 031 Rel-4 4.1.0 Mapping between RANAP and BSSMAP for
Location Services
CN#12 29.010 4.0.0 034r1 Rel-4 4.1.0 Mapping between RANAP and BSSMAP for
Location Services
CN#14 29.010 4.1.0 036r2 Rel-4 4.2.0 LCS/HO Location Reporting – GSM to GSM,
UMTS to GSM and UMTS to UMTS
CN#14 29.010 4.1.0 040 Rel-4 4.2.0 Global replace of BSS-APDU with AN-APDU
CN#14 29.010 4.1.0 047 Rel-4 4.2.0 Removal of deleted MAP operations
CN#16 29.010 4.2.0 048r1 Rel-4 4.3.0 LCS: Mapping BSSMAP-RANAP for request
of assistance data on E interface
CN#16 29.010 4.2.0 051r1 Rel-4 4.3.0 LCS: clarification of mapping for Location
Acquisition
CN#16 29.010 4.2.0 052 Rel-4 4.3.0 Check of NAM and Requesting Node Type on
receipt of SendAuthenticationInfo
ETSI
Change history
CN#16 29.010 4.2.0 054r1 Rel-4 4.3.0 Addition of Service Handover parameters to
MAP Handover messages
CN#16 29.010 4.3.0 Rel-5 5.0.0 Version 5.0.0 created after CN#16.
CN#17 29.010 5.0.0 060 Rel-5 5.1.0 Introduction of GERAN Iu-mode
CN#17 29.010 5.0.0 069r2 Rel-5 5.1.0 Addition of an error mapping table for MAP
Update Location operation
CN#17 29.010 5.0.0 075 Rel-5 5.1.0 Support for Shared Network in connected
mode (using encapsulated BSSAP transport
of SNA access information)
CN#18 29.010 5.1.0 073r1 Rel-5 5.2.0 LCS: Adding missing parameter mapping to
assistance data request procedure after inter-
MSC SRNS Relocation
CN#18 29.010 5.1.0 077 Rel-5 5.2.0 Correction on the use of "User Failure" error
for LCS-MOLR operation
CN#18 29.010 5.1.0 078 Rel-5 5.2.0 Interworking between security mode
procedure and relocation
CN#18 29.010 5.1.0 084r3 Rel-5 5.2.0 Correction to the Service Handover
parameters
CN#20 29.010 5.2.0 088 Rel-5 5.3.0 Correction of LCS cause mapping between
RANAP and BSSMAP
CN#20 29.010 5.2.0 089r1 Rel-5 5.3.0 Handling of UE-specific behaviour data in the
relay MSC
CN#20 29.010 5.2.0 090 Rel-5 5.3.0 Handling of UE-specific behaviour data in the
relay MSC
July 2003 29.010 5.3.0 Rel-5 5.3.1 Implemented CR 29.010-090 removed
CN#21 29.010 5.3.1 091 Rel-5 5.4.0 Addition of Early UE specific cause code
mapping
CN#21 29.010 5.4.0 092r2 Rel-6 6.0.0 Information transfer at MAP-E interface during
inter MSC handover/relocation
CN#22 29.010 6.0.0 095 Rel-6 6.1.0 Wrong message appears in message flow
CN#23 29.010 6.1.0 100r1 Rel-6 6.2.0 Correction of inter system handover cause
mapping
CN#23 29.010 6.1.0 101r1 Rel-6 6.2.0 Include administrative restriction subscription
parameter
CN#23 29.010 6.1.0 103r2 Rel-6 6.2.0 Change to cause code mappings
CN#24 29.010 6.2.0 106r3 Rel-6 6.3.0 Removing of non-existing error indications
from Location update mappings
CN#24 29.010 6.2.0 107 Rel-6 6.3.0 Addition of cause code mapping for BSSAP
Clear Request and RANAP Iu Release
Request
CN#25 29.010 6.3.0 108r2 Rel-6 6.4.0 Addition of cause code mapping to the routing
area update procedure
CN#25 29.010 6.3.0 110 Rel-6 6.4.0 Addition of cause code mapping for inter-
system handover
CN#27 29.010 6.4.0 112 Rel-6 6.5.0 Correction of partly implemented CR108
CT#28 29.010 6.5.0 111r2 Rel-6 6.6.0 Full RANAP support of network initiated
SCUDIF
CT#29 29.010 6.6.0 115 Rel-6 6.7.0 Correction of cause code mapping for the
routing area update procedure
CT#31 29.010 6.7.0 0118 Rel-6 6.8.0 Addition of UMTS Trace parameters to
handover procedure
CT#31 29.010 6.8.0 0117r2 Rel-7 7.0.0 Addition of new cause "Additional roaming not
allowed " in RAU and LAU
CT#32 29.010 7.0.0 0119r2 Rel-7 7.1.0 Use of cause #12 in VPLMNs
CT#32 29.010 7.0.0 0121 Rel-7 7.1.0 Alignment of Cause Mapping
CT#42 29.010 7.1.0 Rel-8 8.0.0 Upgraded unchanged from Rel-7
CT#46 29.010 8.0.0 124r2 Rel-8 8.1.0 Addition of missing cause code mapping for
EPC
CT#46 29.010 8.1.0 0125r1 Rel-9 9.0.0 RANAP Cause and S1AP Cause mapping
CT#48 29.010 9.0.0 0126r1 Rel-9 9.1.0 Removal of MME mapping between Diameter
error codes and NAS CC's
CT#50 29.010 9.1.0 0128r1 Rel-9 9.2.0 Missing BSSGP/RANAP/S1AP Cause Code
mapping for IRAT Handover
ETSI
Change history
CT#52 29.010 9.2.0 0131r2 Rel-9 9.3.0 BSSMAP/RANAP/S1AP Cause Code
mapping for SRVCC Handover
ETSI
History
Document history
V9.0.0 January 2010 Publication
V9.1.0 June 2010 Publication
V9.2.0 January 2011 Publication
V9.3.0 June 2011 Publication
ETSI

Ts 129010v090300p

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ts 129010v090300p

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ts 129010v090300p

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ETSI TS 129 010 V9.3.

Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+);

650 Route des Lucioles

Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16

Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C

Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from:

No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.

© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2011.

Intellectual Property Rights

4.7 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to UMTS)............................................................................................................ 60

4.9.4.1 Inter-MSC Handover (GSM to GSM) ................................................................................................. 118

Annex A (informative): Change history .............................................................................................142

x the first digit:

1 presented to TSG for information;

2 presented to TSG for approval;

3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.

• For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.

[1] 3GPP TS 21.905: "3G Vocabulary".

[2] 3GPP TS 23.009: "Handover procedures".

[7] 3GPP TS 25.413: "Iu interface RANAP signalling".

[9] 3GPP TS 29.002: "Mobile Application Part (MAP) specification".

[16] 3GPP TS 23.271: "Functional stage 2 description of LCS"

[18] 3GPP TS 23.012: "Location management procedures".

2 Classification of interworking cases

2.1 Transparent procedures

- forward new TMSI;

- trace subscriber activity.

2.2 Non-transparent procedures

- outgoing call set-up;

- incoming call set-up;

- cipher mode setting;

3 Interworking in the MSC, Transparent case

These principles are illustrated in figure 1.

Figure 1: Illustration of mapping principles in the MSC

3.2 Routeing area updating

| Network failure MAP_CLOSE |

3.4 Retrieval of the IMSI from the MS

The mapping of information elements is as follows:

- there is no response from the MS.

3.5 Reallocation of TMSI

3.6 Retrieval of the IMEI from the MS

The mapping of information elements is as follows:

- there is no response from the MS.

3.7 Tracing subscriber activity

3.8 Location update

4 Interworking in the MSC, Non-transparent cases

4.2 Outgoing call set-up (MS originating call)

Figure 3: Part of outgoing call set-up sequence

NOTE 4: CM SERVICE REJECT is sent as a result of a user error parameter in the

NOTE 6: RELEASE COMPLETE is sent as a result of a user error parameter in the

A negative outcome for the MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST procedure can be signalled by a

Information element mapping is required between the messages:

- CM SERVICE REQUEST to MAP_PROCESS_ACCESS_REQUEST request;

- SETUP to MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING CALL request;

- MAP_SEND_INFO_FOR_OUTGOING_CALL response, MAP_U/P_ABORT, MAP_NOTICE or premature

The conversion of information elements is as follows:

4.3 Incoming call set-up (MS terminating call)

Figure 4: Incoming call set-up

NOTE 2: Sent only if MAP_SEARCH_FOR_MS was used.