Agile Finance Revealed
Agile Finance Revealed
Agile Finance Revealed
FINANCE
REVEALED
The New Operating Model for Modern Finance
About American Institute of CPAs
The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) is the world’s largest member association representing
the CPA profession, with more than 418,000 members in 143 countries, and a history of serving
the public interest since 1887. AICPA members represent many areas of practice, including
business and industry, public practice, government, education and consulting.
The AICPA sets ethical standards for the profession and U.S. auditing standards for private
companies, nonprofit organizations, federal, state and local governments. It develops
and grades the Uniform CPA Examination, and offers specialized credentials for qualified
professionals who concentrate on personal financial planning; forensic accounting; business
valuation; and information management and technology assurance. With The Chartered
Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), it offers the Chartered Global Management
Accountant® (CGMA®) designation, which sets the global benchmark for quality and
recognition in management accounting.
The AICPA and CIMA also make up the Association of International Certified Professional
Accountants (the Association), which represents public and management accounting globally,
advocating on behalf of the public interest and advancing the quality, competency and
employability of CPAs, CGMAs and other accounting and finance professionals worldwide.
CGMA and Chartered Global Management Accountant are trademarks of the Association of
International Certified Professional Accountants. These trademarks are registered in the United
States and in other countries.
The AICPA maintains offices in New York, Washington, DC, Durham, NC, and Ewing, NJ.
Media representatives are invited to visit the AICPA Press Center at aicpa.org/press
About Oracle
Oracle offers a comprehensive and fully integrated stack of cloud applications, platform
services, and engineered systems. With more than 420,000 customers in more than 145
countries, Oracle provides a complete technology stack both in the cloud and in the data
center. Oracle’s industry-leading cloud-based and on-premises solutions give customers
complete deployment flexibility and unmatched benefits including application integration,
advanced security, high availability, scalability, energy efficiency, powerful performance,
and low total cost of ownership. For more information about Oracle (NYSE: ORCL),
visit oracle.com
FOREWORD 4
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
2 INTRODUCTION 11
Business Agility 12
6 CONCLUSION 42
7 APPENDICES 46
I. Research Methodology 47
II. References 48
III. Authors 48
3 Agile Finance Revealed: The New Operating Model for Modern Finance
Foreword
Our latest study, Agile Finance Revealed, looks to identify the traits of agile finance leaders
and benchmark their success in creating a dynamic new operating model that is resilient,
responsive, and predictive – enabling finance to lead digital transformation – not just react to
it. At Oracle, we believe that digital transformation brings companies into the future, and it
enables them to be more competitive.
The wonderful benefit of an enlightened digital enterprise is, aside from making better
decisions and optimizing all your assets, you are also spending less on things that don’t
advance the agenda of the company or empower employees or customers, and spending
more on your core strengths. There has never been a more important time to be in finance,
using your data-driven insights and enterprise-wide view into operations to guide your
organization through today’s uncertain times. I hope you find Agile Finance Revealed useful
as you look to optimize your own operating model for modern finance, and strengthen your
strategic role as co-pilot to the business.
Safra Catz
Chief Executive Officer
Oracle
The digital age has already changed the nature of work, and will continue to do so. Finance
professionals are not immune: we need to adapt and transform too. By embracing a new
operating model for modern finance we can become exactly the kind of “agile finance
leaders” business requires. This includes using cloud and digital technologies effectively. But it
also requires finance professionals to develop a broader skill set.
Agile Finance Revealed is about this new breed of finance function. Equally, it gets to the
heart of what management accounting is about. Chartered Global Management Accountants
(CGMAs) and CPAs in corporate finance roles are equipped to shape the transformation to
a new finance operating model as described in this report, and participate in and lead agile
finance functions.
Today’s changing business environments need finance professionals such as CGMAs and
CPAs to act as transformation leaders. We therefore strongly encourage CFOs to read this
report to find out about how to develop their people for the future and to ensure an agile
finance function that is fit for purpose in the digital age. We hope that they consider our
CGMA designation as part of their and their company’s future.
In this report, we reveal what exemplifies these high-performing teams: what sets them apart from
their traditional peers, what benefits they bring to their organizations, and what attributes others can
grasp and replicate for their own advantage.
“Agile Finance Revealed: The New Operating Model for Modern Finance” contains the blueprint for the
new operating model for modern finance. It shows what organizations can expect to gain from this
fast-evolving and highly-effective source of competitive advantage.
But how can finance professionals adapt and survive when new digital technologies are threatening the
future of knowledge work? And what does finance have to do to remain relevant, to empower the CFO,
and to enable a business to become agile?
In our efforts to find answers to these questions, we’ve identified a new operating model for modern
finance consisting of the following attributes that enable CFOs and their teams to drive greater
business agility:
• Cross-functional,
integrated teams that are centralized in shared services or centers of
excellence. Empowered by cloud and digital technologies like robotic process automation and
machine learning, the ever-improving accounting services and efficiency delivered by these
teams are driving highly significant business improvement.
• The
ability to unleash the full potential in big data analytics and artificial intelligence. Doing so
stretches the Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) role beyond recognition, into a powerhouse
that generates the insights organizations need to develop innovative strategies and achieve
performance levels that eclipse the competition.
• New
skill sets in statistics, data analysis, data visualization, and business partnering, to
support rapid decision making and performance management. States GE Digital CFO Khozema
Shipchandler, one of the CFOs interviewed for this report: “While it is important to have people
with strong commercial awareness, you cannot replace all the hardcore data scientists and data
analysts with training in statistics who are the true data masters.”
To do so, we commissioned an extensive survey of 483 senior finance executives in large businesses
or other organizations across the USA and Canada, in five key industries: financial services,
manufacturing, retail, healthcare and life sciences, and higher education. We also interviewed CFOs
who have embraced the new operating model and are investing in finance modernization to excel in
their respective industries.
In this report, we identify how agile finance leaders differ from those who are less advanced in their
transformation journey in terms of structure, systems and skills. And we show how they’re more likely
than others to possess the attributes that enable a business to be agile.
• Agile finance leaders are far more likely than others to have fully implemented cloud-based
enterprise performance management (51% vs 17%) and emerging technologies like robotic
process automation (44% vs 12%). They’re also far more likely to have fully implemented
cloud ERP for standardizing their accounting processes (45% vs 17%). (This 51
%is tovs 17
be expected,
however, as we used a high level of implementation as a criterion to segment the leaders.)
%
48%
forward-looking analysis that identifies new
opportunities for revenue growth.
48% 18%
56
51% vs 17 56
teams have demonstrated their agility by
%
% successfully launching
44
a new product or %
service. (Just 43% of others have done so.)
vs 12%
Agility in New
44%
Product Releases
vs 12% 81% vs 56%
• Businesses
supported by agile finance leaders are considerably more likely to report positive
81%
revenue growth
56%
vs (89% vs 63%) and increasing profitability (95% vs 70%).
89% vs 63%
The research also points out a danger of complacency within finance. More than 80% of
respondents reported that their finance function has a leading role to play in driving business
agility, but only 30% agreed or strongly agreed that their finance function is actually providing
the forms of support that businesses need to become agile.
Agile finance leaders provide management with the insights and support they need to execute
against their digital strategies. And the cloud can provide the systems and technologies they need
to enable this. But developing and recruiting talent with the right skills will be the biggest challenge
businesses face.
And it is high time for them to make a start on meeting this challenge: their competitors certainly
include agile finance leaders who have already invested in the new operating model and skill sets
needed to drive profitable growth.
The message is clear: ensure your finance function is fully fit for purpose in the digital age.
To help with the transformation to a new finance operating model, the Association is already
elevating the profession of management accounting. This is through the provision of the CPA
credential and the CGMA designation, which recognize those accountants with the rare combination
of accounting, analysis, and business skills.
These, we believe, are the professionals best positioned to participate in and lead the agile finance
teams of today and tomorrow.
30%
How can the finance function support business agility?
During this process, we identified an emerging new operating model for modern finance. Naturally, we
then wanted to explore if this can drive better business agility, revenue growth, and profitability.
If so, we would want to devise measures of “finance agility”; in other words, to reveal what
differentiates agile finance leaders so that others can replicate their success.
“Moving to the cloud was essentially part of our new technology strategy,” adds Fielding. “While
it started as a program to increase control and transparency around our costs, it’s also enabled
us to respond to changes in the regulatory environment. We couldn’t have responded to that
regulation as quickly as we’ve been able to do if we’d gone with an on-premises solution.”
In addition to cloud, other digital technologies being adopted by modern finance organizations
include robotic process automation (RPA), machine learning, and artificial intelligence. RPA lets
employees configure computer software “bots” to interact with applications and perform high-
volume, repetitive tasks, such as account reconciliation and other processes performed in shared
service centers. Machine learning gives computers the ability to learn without being explicitly
programmed, and is already being used in the financial services industry to optimize business
processes such as internal audit and fraud detection, based on patterns and historical trends. And
artificial intelligence is finding its way into finance processes that require in-depth analysis, such
as analyzing sales across online competitors to determine inventory needs, or forecasting and
recommending pricing strategies to boost revenue and profit.
“For us, machine learning, robotic process systems, and automation are critical and really tied to
our business processes,” notes Vanderbilt CFO Brett Sweet. “These aren’t so much the functions
of software providers, as the means of giving us the discipline we need to not make everything
an exception.”
Accounting Operations
Process management, Standard Reports, Management Information & Analysis
End-to-end processed spanning disciplines
Figure 1 illustrates a simple framework in which we’ve brought together the main characteristics
of the new operating model: accounting operations, subject matter expertise, FP&A, decision
support and performance management, and management and development. This is an important
step towards revealing the key attributes of agile finance leaders.
Accounting Operations
• End-to-end
processes (such as procure-to-pay or hire-to-fire) are being migrated to global
service centers spanning traditional business disciplines, where they are continuously
streamlined or automated to reduce costs and raise standards.
• Robotic
process automation (RPA) is being applied to high-volume, repetitive tasks,
including so-called “swivel chair processes”, where information is routinely selected from
one system and re-entered on another.
• Accountants’
areas of expertise cover a wide range, from the preservation of value in the
core external reporting role (and related activities such as control, compliance, tax, and risk
management) to more commercial roles focused on supporting value generation. These can
include FP&A, project management, and decision support roles.
• FP&A
teams can now focus on informing decisions. They’re constantly improving
the shared understanding of how the business model generates value. For example,
analyzing performance by dimensions, by product, by channel, or by segment can identify
opportunities to innovate, reduce cost, or generate additional revenues. The benefits can be
valuable – sub-optimal performance can be tackled promptly and resources redeployed to
focus on where returns or prospects are better.
• Recent
developments in big data analytics are allowing FP&A teams to access and analyze
the data generated by business processes. Companies can now analyze and leverage
digital data to improve the products or services they offer to customers, to automate
routine decisions, and to enable better ad hoc decision making. And they can use predictive
analytics and artificial intelligence to generate new insights.
• Many
organizations are now using new non-financial KPIs to address the challenge of
managing intangibles, such as the measurement of the customer’s brand experience. Such
KPIs are helping them to focus capital better on those intangibles that generate value and
ensure long-term success.
“We use a digital command center to monitor our new KPIs in real time,” notes GE Digital’s
Shipchandler. “In addition to monitoring traditional KPIs, we started incorporating with some
non-financial metrics that immediately reflect on the financials. Things like product engineering,
completion rates, cycle times, and product engineering quality. And we are starting to pull on
some external social measures – whether our developer count is relevant, our partner count
is relevant.”
Shipchandler’s team also monitors the impact of GE’s “foundries” – similar to customer design
centers – on customer sales. “We look at the number of visits and then the cycle time between
a visit, then when that turns into a lead, and then when that lead turns into an actual bookable
outcome. So there is actually a customer connection to ROI; that’s not just a museum, there’s
an actual ROI that is connected to these foundries.”
• Partnering
between finance and the business cascades the CFO’s influence through the
business to ensure two things: that the decisions taken are based on the proper analysis
of relevant information; and that performance is managed in the interests of stakeholders.
• Finance
transformation is actually business as usual; transformation has to be
measured and managed to ensure that progressive finance functions get measures
of how agile they are.
Of course, digital is already changing the face of finance. As you’d expect, the emergence of the
new operating model is consistent with the findings of other studies. For example, Accenture
analysis suggests that cross-functional integrated teams will be delivering 80% of traditional
finance services by 2020. Not only will staff productivity increase by two to three times – in an
important additional bonus, costs will decline by 40%.iv
CIMA enables the continual development of the syllabus underpinning CGMA designation
through constantly researching the future of finance and the competencies that employers expect
management accountants to have.
The new operating model for modern finance discussed here reflects the key trends identified
in this way. Under it, we can consider finance transformation as a journey in three “dimensions”,
which lead us towards (a) greater efficiency, (b) better information, and (c) more influence.
Machine learning and robotic process automation for efficiency 20% 32% 29%
Better Information
Continuous planning and driver-based forecasting 24% 34% 39%
Non-financial KPIs orient capital allocation towards value 31% 33% 28%
Predictive analytics and artificial intelligence to generate insights 22% 40% 28%
More Influence
Finance skills development to improve influence 24% 40% 31%
As figure 2 shows, over 80% of respondents tell us their businesses are implementing initiatives
that can be seen as aspects of the new operating model for modern finance. These fall under the
key headings of greater efficiency, better information, and more influence.
One example of a company that has leveraged cloud ERP to scale more efficiently is Indiana-based
Irving Materials, Inc. (IMI), a leading manufacturer of construction materials in the Midwest. IMI has
a relentless focus on process optimization that has led to the development of a number of industry
innovations, such as a front-discharge concrete mixer that is now a staple of the industry, and specialty
batch mixes that make pouring and finishing concrete quicker and easier.
Since 2015, the company has completed five acquisitions and doubled its revenues, while reducing
accounts payable headcount by 35%. “We’re in growth mode, and the fact that we’ve been able to
integrate these acquisitions seamlessly without extra costs to my finance function is fantastic,” notes
Chad Kelley, controller at Irving Materials. “Our cloud ERP system really enables us to expand regardless
of location.” Today, Kelley and his team handle complex reporting requirements in 240 different locations
across multiple states, with the ability to refresh financial statements in just minutes.
Better Information: Naturally, the integrity of accounting information is utterly paramount. But to
manage performance, we also need robust analysis of non-financial information about what drives
performance. For this reason, organizations are widely using continuous planning and driver-based
forecasting. And, because it needs to be grounded in commercial reality and reconcilable with the
financial “truth”, accountants are well placed to prepare this information. Despite this, the use of non-
financial KPIs and predictive analytics is less well established. And with the FP&A function now needing
to assess a wide range of complex, non-financial data, new skills are clearly required.
“We have gobs and gobs of data in higher education,” comments J. Michael Gower, EVP for Finance and
Administration and University Treasurer, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. “We don’t have
enough management information. The analytics that are now available to us in the underlying systems
are going to revolutionize how we manage these institutions. As a result, we can start to get at costs.
We can start to get at efficiencies. We can start to get real benchmark data and feedback, not only to the
people doing the job but to our boards as well, to help them understand that we’re doing the best we
can to satisfy the missions and keep higher education as affordable as possible.”
More Influence: Once finance transformation has substantially driven down the cost of the accounting
and finance function, there’s limited scope for taking out more cost. Instead, there’s far more potential
to get value out of finance as a discipline. The ability to do so depends on one or both of the following
options: to develop the skills of finance professionals; or to implement cross-functional teams with
complementary skills.
David Pipes, EVP and CFO at Arby’s, has structured his finance organization to help influence the right
kinds of business outcomes for the fast-food leader. “We set targets for what we’re trying to achieve
and then we also work very closely with the business in marketing and operations primarily as we lay
out opportunities for where we might see our future growth coming from,” he notes. “We also have
a project management office that the finance organization leads, and in that we quickly analyze and
approve new initiatives. We’re there to make sure that we’re doing the best thing for the business, and
other departments recognize we’re doing everything that we can to drive the business forward and help
them in their initiatives.”
Structure
Our organizational structure is too complex 33%
Systems
Our technology systems are too outdated or complex 33%
Skills
We need more analytic skills in order to deliver forward-looking analysis 42%
Addressing this skills gap is the biggest challenge organizations face. As in many forms of business
change, it is the “soft” elements – especially analytical ability and communications skills – that are often
the hardest to get right. “Business leaders want finance professionals to interpret data within their
unique business context,” notes Ivgen Guner, Senior Vice President of Global Business Finance at Oracle.
“They are asking us to come with recommendations tailored to their business issues, so it’s critical that
business partners understand the strategy of the business, what metrics are most significant, what the
competitive landscape looks like, and then advise leaders accordingly. As one of our SVPs put it, ‘There
are 50 numbers on this page. Tell me the three that I need to pay attention to.’ I would go even further
and say, ‘and what I should do about it.’”
Cloud ERP is a well-established technology in the sense that is already widely used. The use of
big data and predictive analytics might still be considered leading edge because of the advanced
analytical skills required, while machine learning and RPA are just getting off the ground. One
might predict that cloud ERP adoption would be higher than the others.
Actually, analysis of survey responses in aggregate suggests the levels of adoption of cloud ERP
and predictive analytics are on a par and the use of machine learning and RPA is not far behind.
Analysis by sector shows some interesting differences:
• The
higher education sector leads adoption of cloud ERP. The financial services and
healthcare and life sciences sectors are relative laggards.
• The
higher education and manufacturing sectors share the lead on the adoption of
predictive analytics and machine learning/RPA. Again, the healthcare and life sciences
sector is some way behind.
These differences in the rate of adoption of new technologies and data analytics suggest that
finance teams in the higher education sector are more likely to be able to drive agility than finance
teams in other sectors as they are further advanced along their finance transformation journeys.
Healthcare
Agile finance leaders are also slightly 0-10 years
Age of Manufacturing
skewed toward higher education 11-50 years
organization
Sector
HE
(22% vs 15%) and the financial Over 50 years
Retail
services (20% vs 16%) sectors, and
17% 14% 16%
Other
skewed against the healthcare and Others 36%
18% 20%
life sciences sector (13% vs 20%).
47% 15% 17%
Figure 7 Agile Finance Leaders: Full Implementation of Key Attributes of Modern Finance
Structure
49%
Centralized finance-related subject matter expertise in global centers
20%
41%
Migrated our end-to-end accounting processes to SSCs
13%
Systems / Technology
51%
Implemented cloud-based enterprise performance management (EPM)
17%
45%
Standardized our accounting and related processes on cloud ERP 17%
44%
Implemented robotic process automation for routine processes
12%
“People like the fact that they can plug the information in and see the results immediately and
as a planning team we can see the roll up right away as opposed to getting all the information in
spreadsheets and downloading those spreadsheets,” Pipes adds. “It’s so much more efficient
from that standpoint. Our cloud-based EPM system has helped eliminate much of the back and
forth spread sheet calisthenics, and I think we have even more opportunities for efficiencies using
the system going forward.”
Reporting 50%
43%
Tax 41%
32%
M&A 29%
18%
Treasury 19%
23%
Agile finance leaders are more likely to have fully centralized services. As figure 8 shows, a
further significant difference is that they’re much more likely to have set up centers of excellence
to handle those areas of expertise that are most important for modern finance: areas like FP&A
(81% vs 56%) and financial skills development (54% vs 32%).
“We are very centralized in all of finance,” notes Arby’s CFO David Pipes. “Our FP&A function is
split between a corporate team and a field finance team. Most of these team members are also
business support partners, which we call finance buddies. Our line of business executives know
that they can always go to these finance partners for whatever they might need, whether it’s just
help in analyzing something that they think they might be doing or questions on their budget or
help with their forecast or whatever it might be. They know they have a finance buddy, and I’ve
found that this works really well.”
Data
visualization Business acumen
skills and commercial
awareness
10%
20%
30%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Financial
Influencing
planning and
skills
analysis skills
The area of least strength for agile finance leaders is that of business acumen and commercial
awareness, with just 36% rating their level of competence as “excellent”. Rotation through
different roles to gain a breadth of experience is a proven way of developing these skills. “People
are hungrier to do different things in a faster-paced environment,” notes Oracle’s Guner. “Any
finance person I hire today can go into business operations, product marketing, accounting,
business market analysis, investment banking, and so on. I love to see folks go from one
discipline to another because it makes them more valuable to the company in the long run.”
“We really test for open-mindedness among our new hires,” adds GE Digital’s Shipchandler.
“When I ran Corporate Audit, the average age of an auditor was around 27; these are very,
very capable individuals. We press them on being open to new ways of doing things, and
challenging new paradigms. That’s an important trait to have, as they will turn out to be our
future CEOs and CFOs.”
Structure
34%
Our organizational structure is too complex 33%
Systems / Technology
34%
Our technology systems are too outdated or complex
33%
34%
Our processes are too customized and/or complex
31%
Skills
46%
We need more analytic skills in order to deliver forward-looking analysis
40%
40%
We need more multi-disciplinary skills
33%
27%
Finance is not recognized as having the business skills needed
21%
Figure 10 shows that agile finance leaders share broadly the same views as others about the obstacles
to finance transformation. Again, skills is the area of greatest concern.
Although they have stronger skills than others, agile finance leaders are more concerned about the
need for analytics skills (46% vs 40%), multi-disciplinary skills (40% vs 33%), and receiving recognition
for their business skills (27% vs 21%). This may reflect a higher level of ambition.
Managers’ use of BI
applications (self-service)
Talent pipeline
Response times
measures
for Subject
for business
Matter Expertise
partnering roles
10%
20%
30%
40%
40%
50%
60%
Head count Head count
of people with specialized of people in FP&A roles
data or IT skills
Figure 11 shows that agile finance leaders are more likely than others to track a range of KPIs that
support improvements in FP&A and business partnering. These include measuring response times for
subject matter expertise requests (58% vs 44%) and the talent pipeline for business partnering roles
(50% vs 40%).
Business managers’ self-service use of BI applications is the area where agile finance leaders are least
likely to have introduced KPIs. Nonetheless, this is also where the relative difference is greatest (38%
vs 24%), suggesting that it is an area of relative weakness for both groups.
Two key activities enable agile finance leader teams to focus more of their
time on supporting the wider business: using cloud technology to automate
routine finance processes; and creating centralized shared services centers
and centers of excellence. We found that 67% of agile finance leader teams
spend more than half of their time on forward-looking analysis/driving new
insight, as compared with just 45% of others.
This difference in focus implies that modern finance teams should have
more capacity to support the business and enable it to become more agile.
At Oracle, we faced exactly this challenge when we first began the shift from a vendor of on-
premises, perpetual license software to a subscription-based, cloud model. Oracle’s finance
team played a critical role in this transition, partnering with the business to develop new KPIs to
measure value in the digital age.
In the traditional on-premises model, we would typically have first looked at the sales pipeline.
Then we would have run predictive analysis on that data, combined it with other internal and
external data points, and tracked the estimates accordingly.
However, everything changes when you move to a cloud model. Take predictive KPIs. When you
move to the cloud, you go from a few deals in the pipeline to many – which can sometimes be
overwhelming. Bookings, provisioning, lead times, renewals, contract base, contract length, churn
rates, in-time capital requirements (i.e., demand predictions), billing requirements and schedules,
and waterfall schedules were just some of the KPIs we examined. In this new world, ‘bookings’ is
the most critical predictive KPI, which was not the case in our old world.
Another example is capital expenditure requirements. Suddenly we were dealing with new data
centers, provisioning, capital needs, and demand predictions. It took us a few months of trial and
error to establish our most meaningful KPIs for the cloud business. We then presented our findings
and recommendations to our C-suite.
This is where perseverance plays a huge role. The C-suite is demanding and intimidating, and asks
the toughest questions you will ever face. Don’t worry if you don’t hit a home run on your first try.
The key is to provide information that is as meaningful and insightful as possible.
After multiple iterations we implemented the new KPIs. There were just a handful to begin with,
but we have established many more as our business has evolved.”
We believe that a finance function might be considered agile if it supports business agility in a number
of corresponding ways. Examples might include how it:
• Horizon-scanning
to identify new business/organizational opportunities and threats (e.g. in
different geographies or sectors).
• Provides a planning framework and measures of progress to help ensure that strategic
objectives are achieved.
• Enables the business to get new products and services rapidly to market
• Improves
resource allocation by delivering real-time understanding of what is and what isn’t
generating value.
A healthy 81% of respondents told us their finance function has a leading role to play in driving
business and organizational agility. But only 30% agreed or strongly agreed that their finance function
provides all the forms of support listed above. Tellingly, however, a full 70% of the finance functions that
do provide all these forms of support were agile finance leaders. Clearly, part of their ability to do so is
thanks to their being well advanced towards the modern finance operating model.
Informs Strategy
49%
Leads on intangible drivers of value
18%
48%
Leads on horizon scanning
18%
48%
Enabling going to market rapidly 22%
53%
Analyzing opportunities to mitigate risks or reduce costs
22%
41%
Improving resource allocation
17%
As figure 12 shows, the business is far more likely to rate agile finance leader teams as “highly
effective” for all the important contributions made by an agile finance team. In fact, such teams are
clearly helping to drive agility for their organizations, giving them a competitive edge over their peers in
areas including strategy formulation, implementation and performance management. For example, the
business views agile finance leaders’ teams as being highly effective at:
• Leading
the business/organization on measuring and understanding the intangible drivers of
value (49% vs just 18% of others).
• Accelerating their organizations’ ability to take new products to market (48% vs 22%).
• Delivering
forward-looking analysis that identifies new revenue growth opportunities for the
business (48% vs 18%).
San Francisco-based CREDO Mobile is faced with a dilemma that affects many small companies
struggling to comply with new accounting rules that were often crafted with large companies in
mind; in this case, the looming ASC606 protocol, which regulates how companies must report
revenue from customer contracts. The new reporting procedures will be mandatory for private
businesses beginning in December 2018, and will affect how CREDO Mobile services the
smartphone needs of its hundreds of thousands of customers across the United States.
The revenue management cloud will allow CREDO to “keep track of a very large number of
contracts and manage the changes to those contracts and accounting on the back end, which will
almost seamlessly change our revenue reporting,” McHugh says. The solution McHugh chose is
built to automate revenue reporting to conform to the new standards, and it will ensure CREDO’s
sales fall into the proper accounting buckets and still tie out to billing.
Research by AICPA and CIMA, commissioned by Oracle in late 2015, identified intangibles as the most
important drivers of value in the digital age. In most cases, however, the KPIs that the finance function
measures or monitors are not directly aligned with these important intangibles. That’s why the digital
imperative for finance is to measure and manage what matters next.ix
In a survey conducted as part of that research, respondents were asked to rank first to fifth what they
consider to be the most important drivers of value in their business. The top five (ranked in their top
five by more than 50% of the 744 respondents) were all intangibles: customer satisfaction, quality of
business processes, customer relationships, quality of people (human capital), and the reputation
of brands.
While technology can generate data for organizations to use to measure these intangibles, this data
tends to belong to the owner of the process. The finance function, however, has a key potential role
as a broker of information, ensuring that salient information is not only validated but also made more
widely available to decision makers.
“There’s a suite of financial metrics obviously, but also a suite of commercial metrics and other leading
indicators. But how do you know whether they turn into a financial result that’s desirable?” asks GE
Digital’s Shipchandler. “I think a lot of companies can’t orchestrate that or can’t figure it out. And it’s
up to finance to do that. We often find ourselves very much playing a connector role, driving financial
discipline, execution, accountability, and strategy, and then serving as the connective tissue across the
entire enterprise.”
When carrying out this research into agility, we asked respondents which of the following types of
non-financial metrics their finance organization measures and monitors to help generate insights for the
business/organization:
• Brand reputation.
• Talent pool (i.e. data about talent pipeline, talent analytics etc.).
Customer
experience
Talent Brand
pool reputation
30%
40%
50%
50%
60%
60%
70%
80%
Efficiency of Competitive
business processes intelligence
As shown in figure 13, we found that agile finance leaders are considerably more likely than others
to measure intangible non-financial KPIs like competitive intelligence (65% vs 53%), brand reputation
(69% vs 59%), and talent analytics (81% vs 58%).
“The five most important KPIs that we measure are quality and safety, employee engagement and
satisfaction, customer engagement and satisfaction, profitability, and top line revenue growth,” notes
Eckes from Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. “The first three of those are predictive indicators of
financial results. If you manage those five key areas at the enterprise-wide level, the rest of the sub
measures can be managed on a department by department basis.”
Lack of talent or skills has been identified as the biggest obstacle in the way of transforming the finance
function towards the new operating model for modern finance. It’s therefore particularly interesting that
the lead was widest when it came to talent analytics.
Agile finance leaders use digital technologies to analyze talent needs and attract the new skill sets
required to guide the business forward. “Using the latest technology helps attract and retain the best
talent – especially among millennials, who expect to work using social and mobile technologies,” notes
Oracle’s Guner. “The talent out there is very socially, digitally aware; for example, potential candidates
do a lot of online research about Oracle. The new digital technologies have given them a window into
our organization, and it also allows us to comb through candidates very easily. They find us, and we
find them.”
Businesses that wish to measure their agility can choose from a number of ways of doing so, including
their recent record of:
• Identifying significant changes in market demand or emerging risks, and taking action before
these start to impact on profitability.
• Entering a new market.
• Responding to a market opportunity by launching a new product or service.
• Responding to a new opportunity or threat by transforming the business model (i.e. fundamentally
changing the way the business makes, delivers, and/or sells its products and services).
• Launching a new digital initiative to enhance the customer experience.
• Rolling out a new business unit.
• Acquiring another business.
70%
63%
33%
25%
11%
5% 5% 4%
0% 0%
Positive Stayed Declined Positive Stayed Declined
growth flat growth flat
Agile Finance Leaders Others Agile Finance Leaders Others
As you can see in figure 15, agile finance leaders were more likely to report positive growth in revenues
(89% vs 63%) and profitability (95% vs 70%) when asked about trends in their business’s performance
over the past three years. (EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization.)
This is a highly meaningful finding. Critically, it also meets our expectation that finance teams adopting
the new operating model for modern finance are better able than others to support their business to
become agile.
CHAD A. ECKES,
EVP OF CORPORATE SERVICES AND CFO,
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
“Agile Finance Revealed: The New Operating Model for Modern Finance” identifies and describes the
emergence of a new operating model for modern finance. This is empowering businesses to achieve
that all-important agility that’s utterly essential to success in today’s rapidly-changing economy.
Digital is already having a massive impact on the face of finance, but this is just the start. As our
report highlights, Accenture analysis suggests that by 2020, cross-functional integrated teams will be
delivering 80% of traditional finance services. This will multiply staff productivity by some two to three
times. And, in an additional bonus, costs will be slashed by 40%.vi
One of the most important aspects of this research was to identify the attributes of these agile finance
leaders. In doing so, we found that they are further advanced in their transformation journey in terms of
structure, systems and skills.
We also measured their agility, and found that they are more likely to possess the attributes that
businesses need to become agile. In addition, the businesses that agile finance leaders support are
more likely than others to have demonstrated agility and to be achieving profitable growth.
Addressing this skills gap is the biggest challenge, and the new operating model for modern finance
requires finance teams to assemble a range of new skills. The need for analytical skills is clear, but it’s in
the area of business acumen and commercial awareness that the greatest weakness exists. Here, only
36% of agile finance leaders rate their level of competence as “excellent”.
43 Agile Finance Revealed: The New Operating Model for Modern Finance
While agile finance leaders recognize that this skills gap is their greatest challenge, being more
ambitious than their less advanced peers they also have plans and performance measures to help
them to close that gap. As well as developing the skills of their existing finance teams, these plans
include recruiting experts from other business disciplines, including those with analytical or commercial
expertise, to complement the traditional accounting skill set.
borne in mind:
• F
inance transformation is a major change project. The starting point is to have three important
properties: a clear understanding of the new role for finance; sponsorship from the leaders of the
business; and buy-in from those going on the journey. In addition, success stories that provide proof
of concept by showing what finance can contribute may improve finance’s credibility.
• A
gap analysis should also be carried out. Where are we now relative to where we want to get to?
What resources will we need? What capabilities do we need to develop? Have we the capacity and
culture to be flexible and implement change?
• The
CFO must agree to a map for the journey, the milestones to be achieved, and the measures of
performance. The software-as-a-service cloud-computing model limits the level of capital expenditure
required. But, as this will inevitably be a major project, sign-off will be required on the business case.
• Partners
with experience of similar projects and expertise in technology must be selected on merit,
based on their track record and reference clients.
• To
manage the transformation, organizations will need measures of their progress towards the new
operating model for modern finance.
• To
build credibility and maintain buy-in from internal customers across the business, organizations
will need measures or evidence of how finance supports business agility.
• Buying
in scarce talent is expensive so leading organizations put an emphasis on developing talent
in-house. They will often have training academies and career planning programs that include rotation
to gain a broad range of experience because they recognize that 80% of learning is gained on the job
when theory is put into practice.
Computerization has long threatened the traditional roles of the accountant and auditorvii. And that
threat is being compounded further by the gathering wave of digital technologies that can automate
knowledge work.
Accountants must be alert to how their world of work may change and develop a personalized
continuing professional education (CPE) plan that’s in line with their own potential and ambitions.
Fortunately, as competition erodes margins and intangibles increasingly become the drivers of value,
the discipline of management accounting is becoming ever more important. That’s because it’s about
providing accounting and management information, and facilitating an objective, rational and measured
commercial approach to improve decision making and performance management.
Critically, the quality of these decisions is the first intangible on which others are built.
In short, above all other finance professionals, management accountants stand to gain most in the
digital era – provided they follow personalized CPE strategies that reflect the changing needs of their
organization, their sector, and their own career aspirations.
To create this report, the AIPCA engaged Longitude Research to carry out a survey of senior finance
professionals in major businesses across a range of sectors in the USA and Canada.
We wanted the research to focus on businesses with total revenues of over $200 million. In addition,
we wanted to take an industry-based approach to our analysis, surveying organizations in five key
industries (financial services, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing, retail, and higher education).
This would enable us to understand which sectors are most advanced in adopting the new operating
model for modern finance, and allow us to benchmark their performance against their peers.
31% 31
23%% 23% Higher Education 85%
31 31
23%% $1-5
23billion
Healthcare and life sciences 84%
% -
$200 million %
Manufacturing 83%
$1 billion
Retail 83%
26% 26
20%% 20% Technology, media and
telecommunications (TMT)
22%
26% 26
20%% 20% Energy and natural resources 21%
The survey was completed by 483 senior finance professionals, 76% of whom were from the USA and
24% from Canada. These respondents all represented organizations with revenue of over $200 million.
A satisfactory spread across the turnover bands ($200 million - $1 billion, $1 billion - $5 billion,
$5 billion - $20 billion and $20 billion plus) was achieved.
The financial services, higher education, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing, and retail sectors
were each represented by robust samples of over 80 respondents. This has allowed us to present
findings by sector.
Peter Simons FCMA, CGMA. Associate Technical Director - Management Accounting. Association of
International Certified Professional Accountants
Lori A. Sexton CPA, CGMA. Senior Technical Manager - Management Accounting. Association of
International Certified Professional Accountants
CGMA and Chartered Global Management Accountant are trademarks of the Association of International Certified Professional
Accountants. These trademarks are registered in the United States and in other countries. The AICPA logo is a trademark of the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and is registered in the United States and in other countries.
Talk to an Oracle applications specialist: +44 207 562 6822 - CHAT NOW -
Copyright © 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is provided for
information purposes only, and the contents hereof are subject to change without notice. This document
is not warranted to be error-free, nor subject to any other warranties or conditions, whether expressed
orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or fitness for
a particular purpose. We specifically disclaim any liability with respect to this document, and no
contractual obligations are formed either directly or indirectly by this document. This document may not
be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose,
without our prior written permission.