Sun 2016
Sun 2016
Sun 2016
CLINICAL ARTICLE
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Objective: To evaluate anatomic and sexual outcomes among young women with severe pelvic organ
Received 28 January 2015 prolapse undergoing combined trachelectomy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension (LHUS).
Received in revised form 25 June 2015 Methods: In a prospective study in Beijing, China, patients (aged ≤50 years) with pelvic organ prolapse of stage
Accepted 23 October 2015 III or higher according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) were enrolled between November
2007 and August 2011. After combined trachelectomy and LHUS, patients were followed up at 6 weeks,
Keywords:
6 months, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Anatomic success was defined as POP-Q lower than stage II. Sexual
Clinical outcome
High uterosacral ligament suspension
outcomes were assessed at 6 months via the validated Short-Form Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Ques-
Laparoscopy tionnaire (PISQ-12), and compared with a control group of 39 healthy age-matched women. Results: Among
Severe 49 patients, surgical success and patient satisfaction rates were 100% after a median follow-up of 54 months.
Uterine prolapse Among 48 patients who were sexually active at follow-up, 39 (81%) completed the PISQ-12 questionnaire.
The 6-month PISQ-12 score was higher than the preoperative score overall (38.1 vs 26.4, P b 0.001) and
for all three subscale domains (P ≤ 0.001). The PISQ-12 score of postoperative patients was similar to that of control
women (36.8, P = 0.52). Conclusion: Trachelectomy combined with LHUS produced satisfactory medium-term
anatomic and functional outcomes for young women with severe uterine prolapse.
© 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
1. Introduction who also have significant cervical elongation [7]. Many of these
women continue to feel a symptomatic bulge after surgery, and the pro-
Uterine prolapse is a common problem for women of all ages world- lapse can recur.
wide, affecting approximately 50% of women who have undergone Although there is no exact definition of cervical elongation, many
childbirth [1]. Among nulliparous young women with a uterus, approx- textbooks describe the “normal” length of the uterine cervix to be
imately 2% have had some form of prolapse [2], which highlights the im- about 3–4 cm. In a previous magnetic resonance imagining study [7],
portance of finding a safe and feasible treatment approach with uterine cervical elongation was defined as greater than 33.8 mm.
preservation and maximum protection of sexual function. At Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), a tertiary refer-
In 1927, Miller [3] first described attachment of the uterosacral liga- ral center in China, more than 500 patients with uterine prolapse are
ment to the vaginal apex (high uterosacral ligament suspension). In treated each year. During clinical practice it has been observed that,
1997, Wu [4] performed laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspen- for most young women with uterine prolapse of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
sion (LHUS) for seven women with uterine prolapse. Subsequently, the Quantification (POP-Q) stage III or higher, the prolapse is associated
anatomic success rate of LHUS among larger samples has been reported with cervical elongation (cervical length ≥4 cm). Previous data also in-
to range from 79% to 87% [5,6]. The success rate varies widely, in part be- dicate that younger, premenopausal women with uterine descent are
cause LHUS might not be successful for women with uterine prolapse more likely to have a longer cervix than are older women with better
apical support [7].
Taken together, these observations prompted us to perform trache-
☆ Preliminary results presented at the 6th Gynecological Endoscopy and Mini-invasive lectomy combined with LHUS instead of LHUS alone when treating
Therapy Scientific Meeting of China; April 26–28, 2013; Luoyang, China. women with cervical elongation. The aim of the present study was to
⁎ Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union
Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China, 100730.
evaluate the medium-term anatomic and sexual function outcomes
Tel.: +86 10 65296784, +86 10 13911714696; fax: +86 10 65124875. among young women with severe uterine prolapse who were surgically
E-mail address: zhu_julie@sina.com (L. Zhu). treated by trachelectomy combined with LHUS.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.012
0020-7292/© 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Z. Sun et al. / International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 132 (2016) 224–228 225
and completed the PISQ-12 questionnaire might be considered finding an anatomic success rate of approximately 80% [4–6,15,16].
“normal” in terms of the behavioral/emotive, physical, and partner- For patients with cervical elongation, however, LHUS is generally
related aspects of sexual function (all P N 0.30). not feasible.
The results of the present study indicate that a combination of trach-
electomy and LHUS is effective for the treatment of these young women
4. Discussion with POP-Q III or IV uterine prolapse, yielding excellent medium-term
outcomes. The anatomic success and patient satisfaction rates were
LHUS is an operation that appends the vaginal apex to the remnants of both 100% during a mean follow-up of at least 3 years, which is consid-
the uterosacral ligaments at the level of the ischial spines without erably higher than the reported 80% anatomic success rate of the
significantly distorting the vaginal axis [5,14]. Previous studies have eval- Manchester procedure [17] and that of LHUS alone. There are some pos-
uated large numbers of women with POP who underwent LHUS alone, sible reasons for this result. First, a combination of trachelectomy and
uterosacral suspension was performed, which reduced both the cervical
elongation rate and the symptomatic bulge after surgery. Second, the
POP-Q point C was elevated by at least 2 cm, which helped to maintain
Table 1 the total vaginal length. Third, the entire uterosacral ligaments were in-
Baseline characteristics.a dependently plicated and shortened to less than 4 cm, reaching a posi-
Characteristic Women undergoing Healthy control tion near the level of the sacrospinous ligaments. This was done so that
trachelectomy women (n = 39) point D would be positioned above −3 cm and thereby ensure that the
and LHUS (n = 49)b operation was effective.
Age, y 37.1 ± 5.3 34.7 ± 2.4 There are few data regarding sexual function outcomes (on the basis
BMI 21.8 ± 1.9 22.9 ± 2.4 of sexual function questionnaires) after LHUS. Doumouchtsis et al. [18]
Gravidity 2.6 (1–5) 2.1 (1–4)
Parity 1.1 (1–2) 1.3 (1–2)
Stage of other site-specific defects
Cystocele
Stage1 31 (63) 2 (5) Table 2
Stage2 15 (31) 0 Preoperative and postoperative POP-Q measurements of women undergoing trachelecto-
Stage3 3 (6) 0 my and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension.
Rectocele
Stage1 26 (53) 1 (3) POP-Q Pre-operative measurement, Postoperative measurement, P valuea
Stage2 18 (37) 0 point cm (n = 49) cm (n = 49)
Stage3 5 (10) 0
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Concurrent surgical procedures
Anterior colporrhaphy 3 (6) 0 Aa −0.1 ± 1.1 −2.3 ± 0.5 b0.001
Posterior colporrhaphy 5 (10) 0 Ba −0.2 ± 2.0 −3.0 ± 0.0 0.001
Intrauterine devices removal 3 (6) 0 C +2.2 ± 0.8 −5.5 ± 0.5 b0.001
TVT-O 2 (4) 0 GH +6.2 ± 0.6 +5.4 ± 0.9 b0.012
Ovarian cyst resection 2 (4) 0 PB +2.5 ± 0.5 +3.3 ± 0.9 0.011
Diagnostic curettage 1 (2) 0 TVL +8.0 ± 0.4 +8.0 ± 0.4 N0.99
Ap −1.4 ± 0.8 −2.8 ± 0.4 b0.001
Abbreviations: LHUS, laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension; BMI (body mass
Bp −2.3 ± 0.6 −3.0 ± 0.0 b0.004
index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters); TVT-O,
D −4.1 ± 0.7 −6.9 ± 0.3 b0.001
tension-free vaginal tape obturator; POP-Q, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification.
a
Values are given as mean ± SD, median (range), or number (percentage). Abbreviations: POP-Q, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification; GH, genital hiatus; PB, perine-
b
All 49 women had POP-Q point D measurements above − 3 cm and POP-Q stage III al body; TVL, total vaginal length.
a
uterine prolapse. Paired t test comparing preoperative and postoperative POP-Q measurement.
Z. Sun et al. / International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 132 (2016) 224–228 227
Table 3
PISQ-12 values of sexually active study women and healthy controls.
PISQ-12 domain Women undergoing trachelectomy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament Healthy women (n = 39)
suspension (n = 39)
Behavioral/ emotive 4.7 ± 1.7 10.5 ± 3.1 5.8 ± 2.9 b0.001 10.3 ± 2.0 0.71
Physical 13.4 ± 2.3 18.6 ± 1.8 5.2 ± 2.4 b0.001 18.2 ± 1.0 0.30
Partner related 8.3 ± 1.9 9.0 ± 2.6 0.7 ± 1.3 0.001 9.0 ± 1.0 0.90
Total score 26.4 ± 3.9 38.1 ± 5.5 11.7 ± 5.1 b0.001 37.5 ± 3.0d 0.52
200
180
Improvement from baseline, %
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
Fig. 2. Improvements in individual item scores of the Short-Form Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire at 6 months after after surgery among women with severe uterine
prolapse. Abbreviations: Incon fear, fear of incontinence; Prem ejacln, premature ejaculation.
assessed 42 women with POP who underwent vaginal hysterectomy numbness after surgery, indicating that there were no nerve injuries.
combined with LHUS. At 5 years after surgery, 18 of 20 women who The reason why the present patients did not experience nerve injuries
were sexually active completed the PISQ-31. The mean total score for is not clear. It might be due to the surgical approach, whereby the entire
all domains was 91/125 (which is equivalent to a mean total score of uterosacral ligaments were plicated and shortened to less than 4 cm
35/48 in the PISQ-12 [12]. In the present study, the mean PISQ-12 after the knots were tied.
total score for the 39 sexually active women was 38.1 points at 6 One of the strengths of the study is that the examiners who per-
months after surgery, which was 11.7 points higher than the preopera- formed all of the sexual function assessments (Z.X.S. and H.Y.H.) were
tive score (P b 0.001). There was no significant difference in PISQ-12 different from the surgeon who performed the surgery (L.Z.) to avoid
score between the postoperative group and the age-matched control the risk of positive outcome bias. However, the study has some major
group. These results indicate that the present approach protected the limitations. First, owing to the relatively low success rate (~ 80%) of
sexual function of the young women who had severe uterine prolapse, the Manchester procedure [17], it was not appropriate to include two
at least within a short-term follow-up period. As compared with the study groups to compare trachelectomy only with trachelectomy and
study of Doumouchtsis et al. [18], there were more sexually active pa- LHUS. Second, the present study design included a healthy control
tients with a higher equivalent PISQ-12 score in the present cohort. A group; however, whether the PISQ-12 questionnaire was appropriate
possible explanation might lie in the better anatomic outcomes of the for these healthy volunteers and whether the sample was sufficiently
present study (100% vs 88% success rate). powered for a comparison between women with uterine prolapse and
Symptoms affecting lower extremity sensory nerves can be one of healthy women require further investigation.
the most common late complications of LHUS. Flynn et al. [19] retro- In summary, a combination of trachelectomy and LHUS is a simple
spectively evaluated 182 LHUS procedures, finding that seven women and effective procedure that has been found to provide satisfactory
had severe postoperative pain and numbness in a S2–4 distribution medium-term anatomic and sexual function outcomes for young
within 24 hours. These symptoms seemed to be related to placement women with severe uterine prolapse. A trial with a more appropriate
of the uterosacral ligament sutures. Three of the women experienced control group is needed to confirm the present results.
symptom relief after prompt removal of the ipsilateral uterosacral liga-
ment suture. The remaining four women were treated with gabapentin
and narcotics, which partially reduced their symptoms. By contrast, no Conflict of interest
intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in the present
study. The patients experienced no more than moderate pain and no The authors have no conflicts of interest.
228 Z. Sun et al. / International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 132 (2016) 224–228
References [11] Wren PA, Janz NK, Brubaker L, Fitzgerald MP, Weber AM, LaPorte FB, et al. Reliability
of health-related quality of life measures 1 year after surgical procedures for pelvic
[1] Patel PD, Amrute KV, Badlani GH. Pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary inconti- floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192(3):780–8.
nence: A review of etiological factors. Indian J Urol 2007;23(2):135–41. [12] Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the
[2] Patel PD, Amrute KV, Badlani GH. Pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int
stress urinary incontinence. Indian J Urol 2006;22(4):310–6. Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003;14(3):164–8.
[3] Miller N. A new method of correcting complete inversion of the vagina: with or [13] Zhu L, Yu S, Xu T, Yang X, Lu Y, Lang J. Validation of the Chinese version of the Pelvic
without complete prolapse; report of two cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1927;44: Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12). Int
550–5. J Gynecol Obstet 2012;116(2):117–9.
[4] Wu MP. Laparoscopic uterine suspension for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. [14] Lin LL, Ho MH, Haessler AL, Betson LH, Alinsod RM, Liu CY, et al. A review of laparo-
Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997;59(3):259–60. scopic uterine suspension procedures for uterine preservation. Curr Opin Obstet
[5] Maher CF, Carey MP, Murray CJ. Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine pro- Gynecol 2005;17(5):541–6.
lapse. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(6):1010–4. [15] Diwan A, Rardin CR, Strohsnitter WC, Weld A, Rosenblatt P, Kohli N. Laparoscopic
[6] Lin LL, Phelps JY, Liu CY. Laparoscopic vaginal vault suspension using uterosacral lig- uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy
aments: a review of 133 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12(3):216–20. with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic
[7] Berger MB, Ramanah R, Guire KE, DeLancey JO. Is cervical elongation associated with Floor Dysfunct 2006;17(1):79–83.
pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 2012;23(8):1095–103. [16] Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Bergamini V, Serati M, Cromi A, Franchi M, et al. Laparoscopic
[8] Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The uterosacral ligaments placation for the treatment of uterine prolapse. Arch Gynecol
standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor Obstet 2007;276(3):225–9.
dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175(1):10–7. [17] Thys SD, Coolen A, Martens IR, Oosterbaan HP, Roovers J, Mol B, et al. A comparison
[9] Zhu L, Lang JH, Hu HY, Gong XM, Shi HH. Effects of Laparoscopic high uterosacral of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as
ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation on severe uterine treatment for uterine descent. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(9):1171–8.
prolapse in young women [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2008;43(11): [18] Doumouchtsis SK, Khunda A, Jeffery ST, Franco AV, Fynes MM. Long-term outcomes
865–6. of modified high uterosacral ligament vault suspension (HUSLS) at vaginal hysterec-
[10] Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski RR, et al. The tomy. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(5):577–84.
standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int [19] Flynn MK, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL. Sensory nerve injury after uterosacral liga-
Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12(3):178–86. ment suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195(6):1869–72.