Vol. 132 (2017) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A No.

Special issue of the 3rd International Conference on Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering (ICCESEN 2016)

Cross-Drainage Culvert Design by Using GIS

M. Günal∗ , M. Ay and A.Y. Günal
Uviversity of Gaziantep, Department of Civil Engineering, Gaziantep, Turkey
A culvert is a structure that allows water to flow under a road, railroad, trail, or similar obstruction, from one
side to the other side. Typically embedded, so as to be surrounded by soil, a culvert may be made from a pipe,
reinforced concrete or other material. In order to minimize the impact of a water crossing on the environment,
culverts require the proper size, design and installation, to ensure that they do not cause downstream erosion,
upstream flood, alter stream habitat or block organism passage. In this study, the size of a box culvert has been
determined by getting more realistic maximum flow rates, by using data of a geographic information system. The
results of this study have been compared with the rational method. The size of the culvert, which is calculated
by using data from geographic information system will be more realistic and efficient, compared to the culvert,
calculated by rational method.
DOI: 10.12693/APhysPolA.132.595
PACS/topics: 92.40.FB, 92.40.QP, 07.05.MH

1. Introduction and configurations, by using real-time data for discharge

and water levels at several upstream and downstream lo-
Cross-drainage culverts extend under roadways and cations of a culvert structure.
transport runoff across the roadways. Design of road-
crossing culverts should take into account many engi-
neering and technical aspects at the culvert site and the
adjacent areas (Figs. 1, 2). The engineer must also incor-
porate personal experience and judgment, to determine
which criteria must be considered and how to design the
final dimensions of the culvert [1]. A drainage culvert
should be designed according to design standards, that
can safely drain the design peak flow.

Fig. 2. Box culvert.

Fig. 1. Barrel culvert.

Norman et al. [2] compared several culvert design met-

hods to find out the best design method. Culvert de-
sign methods are presented for both conventional culverts Fig. 3. Location of the drainage culvert.
and culverts with inlet improvements. Muste et al. [3]
conducted steady and unsteady flow laboratory measure- This study focuses on designing a box culvert for 10
ments for a variety of culvert-barrel cross-section shapes and 100 years maximum rainfall intensity, that was obtai-
ned from Gaziantep meteorology station, between Ara-
ban town of Gaziantep district and Besni town of Adıya-
man district. The location of the centroid of culvert is
∗ corresponding author; e-mail: gunal@gantep.edu.tr at the 37◦ 300 3300 North latitude and the 37◦ 420 2300 East
longitudes, as shown in Fig. 3.

(595)
596 M. Günal, M. Ay, A.Y. Günal

2. Overview of geographical information system

Geographical information system (GIS) is a powerful

tool and is of great use for problem solving in many fields.
In the 1970’s and early 1980’s, GIS mainly consisted of
presenting maps on a display to support various types
of geographically related information. GIS are becoming
more and more widespread. Today most problems in en-
gineering, such as geomorphologic parameters of a basin
and forming synthetic hydrographs were studied by Gü-
nal and Güven [4, 5]. GIS has been also a very important
tool for making predictions. Günal and Kösen [6] app-
lied GIS tool for predicting underground drinking water
areas in Gaziantep region. Fig. 5. Calculation of culvert catchment area.

3. Case study

The culvert is located on D850 road, between Araban

and Besni districts, in the region of South Anatolia of
Turkey. The area of the culvert catchment is 5.55 km2 .
The boundary of catchment is extracted from the digital
elevation map (DEM). The DEM was obtained from the
NASA-EOSDIS (National Aeronautics and Space Admi-
nistration’s Earth Observing System Data and Informa-
tion System), as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 6. Calculation of time of concentration.

in Fig. 6. The ArcGIS program has calculated time of

concentration by using the following equations.
T1 = L1 /V1 × 60, (1)
T2 = 0.0195(L2 /H2 )0.385 , (2)
where, T1 is flow time over the land, L1 is flow length
over the land and V1 is flow velocity over the land, T2 is
flow time on drainage bed, L2 is the length of drainage
bed and H2 is elevation difference of drainage bed. Total
time of concentration in minutes is calculated by sum-
Fig. 4. DEM of the culvert catchment.
mation of T1 and T2 , as follows;
3.1. Calculation of catchment area by using GIS Tt = T1 + T2 . (3)

Culvert catchment is determined by uploading DEM 3.3. Runoff coefficient

to ArcGIS program. The border of the catchment area The relationship between rainfall and runoff is determi-
is determined by entering the coordinates of the culvert. ned by a dimensionless coefficient, known as runoff coef-
The catchment area was calculated to be 10.74 km2 and ficient, that has a large value for areas with low permea-
is shown in Fig. 5. bility. In order to determine the annual runoff coefficient
3.2. Time of concentration calculation by using GIS of a basin, the total annual stream flow is plotted against
the total annual precipitation. The slope of the regres-
The DEM of culvert basin is analyzed by Global Map- sion line is accepted to be the runoff coefficient (Fattah
per V.16.1 and slopes of drainage lines are determined and Yuce [7]). The calculated runoff coefficient, which
using ArcGIS program. The precipitation data belon- is a function of vegetation cover, degree of urbanization,
ging to Gaziantep district is loaded into ArcGIS pro- climatological features and geological setting of the cat-
gram. The time of concentration for 10 and 100 years chment area, plays a major role in the planning, design
of occurrence are determined by using ArcGIS. The time and operation of water resources projects in a catchment
of concentration output of the ArcGIS program is shown (Kadioglu and Şen [8], Sen and Altunkaynak [9], La Torre
 Cross-Drainage Culvert Design by Using GIS 597

Torres et al. [10], Raji et al. [11]). In this study, runoff

coefficient C is calculated to be 0.12, which is a commonly
used value for forest areas.

3.4. Peak flow calculation by using GIS

After entering the rainfall-intensity curve from the Ga-
ziantep meteorology station into the ArcGIS program,
the surface flow rate was calculated according to Eq. (4).
The calculated surface flow rates for 10 and 100 years of
rainfall intensity I are shown in Figs. 7 and 8.
Q = CIA/3600, (4)
3 2
where, Q is flow rate (m /s), A is basin area (m ), C is
runoff coefficient and I is rainfall intensity (m/hr).

Fig. 8. Surface flow rate Q, calculated using GIS for

100 years.
TABLE I
Calculated and predicted discharges.

Q10 Q100 Box Box size

[m3 /s] [m3 /s] number [m]
Relation method 26.8 43.84 2 (3.0 × 3.0)
GIS 40.2 65.76 2 (4.5 × 4.5)

It is seen from Table I that there are some differen-

ces between discharges calculated using two methods.
The discharge of GIS method seems to be larger by 50%
for both discharges of 10 and 100 years of return pe-
Fig. 7. Surface flow rate Q, calculated using GIS for riod. This is because in rational method, some of the
10 years. parameters are approximated and assumed according to
handbook of General Directorate of Highway, but in GIS
3.5. Culvert dimensions method, the program takes the values from the digital
map using most updated values of geomorphologic para-
The Manning equation is used to calculate the diame-
meters.
ter of culvert (Rothwell [12]), as follows:
 3/4 3/4  The culvert design in rational method is done by consi-
Q n dering the contour lines, which are crucial in area calcu-
D= , (5)
S 3/4 π 3/4 lation. In ArcGIS program, the area calculation is done
where, D is culvert diameter (m), S is culvert slope directly using the satellite map. A surface survey is per-
(m/m), value of 0.015 was selected by default, n is formed and the calculations for the box culvert design
roughness coefficient of culvert, which was set to 0.021 are done according to the ground elevation and area is
(Chow [13]), Q is discharge (m3 /s), obtained from computed without the error.
Eq. (4).
5. Conclusions
4. Comparison of rational method
and GIS model
The discharge values of GIS method were 50% larger
The discharges calculated with relation method (Ge- than the discharge values of rational method for both
neral Directorate of Highway Approach) and discharges 10 and 100 years return period. The advantage of rati-
calculated using GIS model are shown in Table I. onal method, giving lower dimensions, is the lower cost
598 M. Günal, M. Ay, A.Y. Günal

of the construction of the culvert, and the disadvantage [5] A.Y. Günal, A. Güven, Acta Phys. Pol. A 130, 130
is caused by the fact, that some parameters are approxi- (2016).
mated. In extreme climate conditions the capacity of the [6] M. Günal, A. Kösen, Acta Phys. Pol. A 128, B-107
constructed culvert might be not enough to carry out the (2015).
collected water, which can let the water to cross over and [7] W.H. Fattah, M.I. Yuce, Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol.
so, to damage the roadway. It is also concluded that GIS 5, 47 (2015).
method is more trustworthy than the rational method, [8] M. Kadioglu, Z. Şen, Hydrological Sci. J. 46, 3
because of using the real digital maps. (2001).
[9] Z. Sen, A. Altunkaynak, Hydrol. Process. 20, 1993
(2006).
References
[10] I.B. La Torre Torres, D.M. Amatya, G. Sun, T.J. Cal-
lahan, Hydrol. Proc. 25, 2032 (2011).
[1] M.S. Kanga, J.H. Koob, J.A. Chunc, Y.G. Herd,
S.W. Parka, K. Yooe, Biosystems Eng. 104, 425 [11] P. Raji, E. Uma, J. Shyla, Agricult. Engin. Int.:
(2009). CIGR J. 13, 1 (2011).
[2] J.M. Norman, R.J. Houghtalen, W.J. Johnson, Hy- [12] R.L. Rothwell, Watershed Management Guidelines for
draulic Design of Highway Culverts, 2nd ed., 2001. Logging and Road Construction in Alberta, Informa-
[3] M. Muste, H.C. Ho, D. Mehl, Insights into the Ori- tion Report NOR-X-198, Northern Forest Research
gin and Characteristics of the Sedimentation Process Centre, Canadian Forest Service, 1978.
at Multi-Barrel Culverts in Iowa in: Technical report [13] V.T. Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill
IHRB project TR-596, The Iowa Highway Research Book Company, New York 1959.
Board, 2010.
[4] A.Y. Günal, A. Güven, Acta Phys. Pol. A 128,
B-222 (2015).