CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE

(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)

ISOMETRIC OF MAIN STRUCTURE MODEL

DESIGN ASSUMPTION BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA IN ITB DOCUMENT :

‐ WAVE HEIGHT : 3.62 M (BASED ON MAX. INDIVIDUAL WAVE IN 100 YEARS R.P)
‐ WAVE RETURN PERIOD : 5.48 S (BASED ON MAX. INDIVIDUAL WAVE IN 100 YEARS R.P)
‐ SEA CURRENT VEL. : 2.42 M/S (THE MAXIMUM OCCURRED AT 10% OF SEA DEPTH)
‐ SEABED DEPTH : 19.6 M
‐ WAVE THEORY : AIRY WAVE THEORY
‐ TEMPERATURE : 93.30C FOR OPERATING & 27.50C FOR SEAWTER TEMPERATURE
‐ SOIL CONDITION : SOFT CLAY (SOIL SPRING CONSTANT 8,140 KPA/M)
‐ DESIGN LIFE : 25 YEARS
‐ DESIGN CODE : AISC 360, API WSD, DNV, ABS & SNI FOR SEISMIC REQUIREMENT

Page 1 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
STRENGTH AND FATIGUE CALCULATON FOR STRUCTURE MEMBERS :

The strength analysis will be conducted based on AISC-360 Code with allowable stress design method. The
strength analysis result will be represented as strength ratio (the ratio between total stress caused by combined
design loads and allowable stress of the structure’s members).

The fatigue calculation is based on ABS (American Bureau of Shipping) Code, Guide for Fatigue Assessment of
Offshore structure. The end result is maximum principal stress range based on total cycles in design life. Since
the structure will be designed by using non-tubular members, the parameters will refer to ABS S-N Curves for
Non-Tubular Details in Seawater with Cathodic Protection.

Summary of the calculation result shown as follows :

DESIGN FATIGUE LIFE FOR STRUCTURE MEMBERS

No. ITEMS Nomenclature Value Reference

1 Design Life in Years Ty 25 ITB Requirement

2 Fatigue Design Factor FDF 3 ABS Table 1, Appendix 3

3 Total Design Life in second Td 2.4E+09 FDF*Ty*365*24*60*60

4 Total Design Cycles in Design Life NT 5.5E+08 Td / (Average Twave)

5 Plate Thickness in mm T 19 Based on Design Propose

ABS S-N Curves for Non-Tubular
Number of cycles when S-N curve has
6 NQ 1.01E+06 Details in Seawater with Cathodic
slope change
Protection (Section 3,Table 2)
7 Fatigue strength coefficient A 2.52E+11

8 Fatigue strength exponent M 3 ABS Parameter for Non-Tubular

Details in Seawater with Cathodic
C 9.97E+14 Protection (Section 3,Table 2, for MPa
9 Fatigue Strength Parameters unit)
R 5

10 Stress Range when it has slope change SQ 62.9

11 Thickness exponent factor K -0.25 ABS setion 3.1.4

ABS Section 2.1.3 for stress range
Max.calculated principle stress range in
12 SR 178.34 parameter and 3.1.4 for thickness
the basic reference thickness in MPa
correction (if t ≥ 22 mm)
13 Weibull Scale Parameter Δ 0.75
IACS 1997
14 Weibull Shape Parameter Ϫ 1
Number of cycles in referenced period of
15 NR 2.12E+10 ABS Section 5.3.3
time

The summary of design results of principal stress of structure element of mudmat :

‐ MAX. BEAM STRESS : 46.082 MPA < 178.34 MPA (OK)

‐ MAX. STRENGTH RATIO : 0.285 (OK < 1)

Page 2 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)

MAXIMUM STEEL BEAM STRESS AT DESIGN LOAD COMB

‐ MAX. PLATE STRESS : - PRINCIPAL STRESS = 4.014 MPA (SHEAR & BENDING)
‐ VON MIS STRESS = 6.240 MPA (DISTORTION)

Max Top
(Principal Major Stress)
Stress)
N/ mm2
<= -1.13
-0.807
-0.486
-0.164
0.157
0.479
0.8
1.12
1.44
1.76
2.09
2.41
2.73
3.05
3.37
3.69
>= 4.01

Y
X
Z Load 1085

MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRESS OF MUDMAT PLATE (4.014 MPA< 178.34 MPA (OK))

Page 3 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
Von Mis Top
N/ mm2
<= 0.330
0.699
1.07
1.44
1.81
2.18
2.55
2.92
3.28
3.65
4.02
4.39
4.76
5.13
5.5
5.87
>= 6.24

Y
X
Z Load 1087

MAXIMUM VON MIS STRESS OF MUDMAT PLATE (2.444 MPA < 178.34 MPA (OK))

STRENGTH AND FATIGUE CALCULATON FOR PIPE MEMBERS :

The strength analysis will be conducted based on ASME B31.4 Code with allowable stress design method. The
strength analysis result will be represented as strength ratio (the ratio between total stress caused by combined
design loads and allowable combined stress of the pipe). Internal pressure of the pipe will not be considered in
the structure model in order to get critical result.

The fatigue calculation is based on ABS (American Bureau of Shipping) Code, Guide for Fatigue Assessment of
Offshore structure. The end result is maximum principal stress range based on total cycles in design life. The
parameters will refer to ABS S-N Curves for Tubular Intersection Joint in Seawater with Cathodic Protection.

Summary of the calculation result shown as follows :

DESIGN FATIGUE LIFE FOR PIPE MEMBERS

No. ITEMS Nomenclature Value Reference

1 Design Life in Years Ty 25 ITB Requirement

2 Fatigue Design Factor FDF 3 ABS Table 1, Appendix 3

3 Total Design Life in second Td 2.4E+09 FDF*Ty*365*24*60*60

4 Total Design Cycles in Design Life NT 5.5E+08 Td / (Average Twave)

Based on Design Propose with
5 Plate Thickness in mm T 12.7
Corrosion Allowance
ABS S-N Curves for Tubular
Number of cycles when S-N curve has Intersection Joint in Seawater with
6 NQ 1.77E+06
slope change Cathodic Protection (Section 3,Table
4)
ABS Parameter for Tubular
7 Fatigue strength coefficient A 7.3E+11
Intersection Joint in Seawater with

Page 4 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
DESIGN FATIGUE LIFE FOR PIPE MEMBERS

No. ITEMS Nomenclature Value Reference

Cathodic Protection (Section 3,Table 4,
8 Fatigue strength exponent M 3 for MPa unit)
C 4.05E+15
9 Fatigue Strength Parameters
R 5

10 Stress Range when it has slope change SQ 74.5

11 Thickness exponent factor K -0.25 ABS setion 3.1.4

ABS Section 2.1.3 for stress range
Max.calculated principle stress range in
12 SR 236.05 parameter and 3.1.4 for thickness
the basic reference thickness in MPa
correction (if t ≥ 22 mm)
13 Weibull Scale Parameter Δ 0.75
IACS 1997
14 Weibull Shape Parameter Ϫ 1
Number of cycles in referenced period of
15 NR 4.66E+13 ABS Section 5.3.3
time

The summary of design results of combined stress for pipe element (with internal corrosion allowance) :

‐ MAX. PIPE STRESS : - 12” PIPE = 22.305 MPA < 236.05 MPA (OK)

‐ 24” PIPE = 57.142 < 236.05 MPA (OK)

Page 5 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
‐ 28” PIPE = 54.810 MPA < 236.05 MPA (OK)

All actual combined stress of the pipe have been below the allowable combined stress as per ASME B31.4
Chapter IX, Sect. A402.3.5 (322.67 MPa).

‐ MAX. STRENGTH RATIO : - 12” PIPE = 0.069 (OK < 1)

‐ 24” PIPE = 0.177 (OK < 1)
‐ 28” PIPE = 0.170 (OK < 1)

‐ MAX. WEIGHT : ≈ 32 TON IN AIR (INCLUDING CATHODIC PROTECTION)

MAX. WEIGHT : ≈ 26 TON IN WATER (INCLUDING CATHODIC PROTECTION)

ISOMETRIC DRAWING OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN RESULT

(CATHODIC PROTECTION NOT SHOWN)

Page 6 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
ON BOTTOM STABILITY ANALYSIS :
The analysis will be conducted for the PLEM foundation (mudmat foundation) to verify the following design
issues :
‐ The gravity base has sufficient on bottom weight to prevent uplift. For simplified analysis, the gavity
based will be judged as safe base due to uplift if there are no tension forces acting on each spring
supports. But, if tension force will be occurred, continuous analysis for uplift and overturning effect will
be proceed.
‐ The soil has sufficient bearing capacity to resist vertical loads from the PLEM. The allowable bearing
capacity will considering settlement effect and safety factor 3.
‐ The PLEM has enough weight in water to prevent sliding with safety factor 2.

PLAN OF PLEM STRUCTURE MODEL

The calculation result shown as follows :

Page 7 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
CALCULATION OF MUDMAT FOUNDATION DUE TO MAXIMUM COMPRESSION FORCE
Distance to
Base Load Maximum Allowable Pressure
Center of
Eccentricity Pressure (q) with Safety Factor 3
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal A Ix Iz Base Mat
Node Note Chk*d
∑Fy/A ±
ex ez x z (qallow)
Mx/Iz ± Mz/Ix
Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m2 m4 m4 m m m m t/m2 t/m2
5 0.029 1.153 -0.027 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
6 -0.009 1.308 -0.012 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 -4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
7 0.008 0.735 0.079 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
8 0.056 0.89 -0.163 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 -4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
9 -0.02 0.822 0.062 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.628 4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
10 0.024 0.977 -0.71 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.628 -4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
11 -0.005 0.952 -0.293 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
12 -0.018 1.107 -0.296 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 -4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
13 -0.005 1.263 -0.005 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 -1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
14 0.302 0.844 0.214 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 -1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
29 0.135 0.782 -0.532 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
30 0.036 1.2 -0.042 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
31 0 0.931 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.629 -1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
33 0 0.869 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.629 1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
34 0 1.061 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 -1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
36 0 0.999 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
87 -0.023 1.207 -0.061 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 -4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
88 0 1.162 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 -1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
89 0 0.857 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 0 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
90 0 0.825 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
91 0.001 0.778 0.019 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
92 0.037 0.934 -0.135 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 -4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
93 -0.033 1.042 -0.209 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 -4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
94 0 0.888 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 3.564 -1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
95 0 0.996 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 -1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK

Page 8 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
CALCULATION OF MUDMAT FOUNDATION DUE TO MAXIMUM COMPRESSION FORCE
Distance to
Base Load Maximum Allowable Pressure
Center of
Eccentricity Pressure (q) with Safety Factor 3
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal A Ix Iz Base Mat
Node Note Chk*d
∑Fy/A ±
ex ez x z (qallow)
Mx/Iz ± Mz/Ix
Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m2 m4 m4 m m m m t/m2 t/m2
96 0 1.131 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 0 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
97 0 0.965 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 0 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
98 0 1.1 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
99 0 0.934 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 1.7 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
100 0.037 1.053 -0.117 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
101 -0.021 0.887 -0.065 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 4.25 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
102 0.029 1.177 -0.021 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
103 0 0.976 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
104 -0.337 1.216 1.024 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
105 0 1.015 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
106 0 1.046 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 -0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
107 -0.576 1.247 -1.734 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 -0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
108 -0.009 1.285 -0.008 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 4.5 -2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
109 0 1.084 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 0.167 -2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
110 0 1.079 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
111 0 1.112 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
112 0 1.143 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 -0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
113 0 1.184 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 2.3335 -2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
114 0 0.846 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.628 2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
115 0 0.907 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
116 0 0.885 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.628 0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
117 0 0.944 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
118 0 0.916 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.628 -0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
119 0 0.974 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 -0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
120 0 0.954 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -2.638 -2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK

Page 9 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
CALCULATION OF MUDMAT FOUNDATION DUE TO MAXIMUM COMPRESSION FORCE
Distance to
Base Load Maximum Allowable Pressure
Center of
Eccentricity Pressure (q) with Safety Factor 3
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal A Ix Iz Base Mat
Node Note Chk*d
∑Fy/A ±
ex ez x z (qallow)
Mx/Iz ± Mz/Ix
Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m2 m4 m4 m m m m t/m2 t/m2
121 0 1.012 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -1.2305 -2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
122 0.044 0.758 0.406 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
123 0.534 0.797 0.831 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
124 0.609 0.829 -1.225 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 -0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
125 0.163 0.867 -0.685 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -4.5 -2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
126 0 0.798 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
127 0 0.835 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
128 0 0.867 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 -0.85 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
129 0 0.905 0 77 516.4 460.6 -0.18 -0.133 -3.564 -2.975 0.724 1 COMPRESSION OK
0.988 58.31 -3.705 Sliding Force = 3.83 ton
-> OK
Sliding Resistant = 10.20 ton

Page 10 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
CALCULATION OF MUDMAT FOUNDATION DUE TO MINIMUM COMPRESSION FORCE
Distance to
Base Load Maximum Allowable Pressure
Center of
Eccentricity Pressure (q) with Safety Factor 3
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal A Ix Iz Base Mat
Node Note Chk*d
∑Fy/A ±
ex ez x z (qallow)
Mx/Iz ± Mz/Ix
Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m2 m4 m4 m m m m t/m2 t/m2
5 -0.096 0.955 0.045 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
6 -0.108 0.956 -0.046 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 -4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
7 -0.096 0.497 -0.001 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
8 -0.102 0.498 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 -4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
9 -0.097 0.593 -0.079 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.628 4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
10 -0.102 0.593 0.097 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.628 -4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
11 -0.11 0.735 -0.016 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
12 -0.114 0.736 0.003 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 -4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
13 -0.49 0.956 0.002 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 -1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
14 -0.539 0.498 -0.069 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 -1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
29 -0.557 0.497 0.073 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
30 -0.492 0.956 -0.005 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
31 0 0.593 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.629 -1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
33 0 0.593 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.629 1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
34 0 0.736 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 -1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
36 0 0.735 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
87 -0.025 0.846 -0.08 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 -4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
88 0 0.846 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 -1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
89 0 0.545 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 0 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
90 0 0.545 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
91 -0.017 0.545 -0.043 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
92 -0.018 0.546 0.045 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 -4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
93 -0.068 0.664 0.054 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 -4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
94 0 0.545 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 3.564 -1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
95 0 0.664 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 -1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK

Page 11 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
CALCULATION OF MUDMAT FOUNDATION DUE TO MINIMUM COMPRESSION FORCE
Distance to
Base Load Maximum Allowable Pressure
Center of
Eccentricity Pressure (q) with Safety Factor 3
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal A Ix Iz Base Mat
Node Note Chk*d
∑Fy/A ±
ex ez x z (qallow)
Mx/Iz ± Mz/Ix
Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m2 m4 m4 m m m m t/m2 t/m2
96 0 0.846 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 0 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
97 0 0.664 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 0 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
98 0 0.846 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
99 0 0.664 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 1.7 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
100 -0.024 0.845 0.074 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
101 -0.072 0.664 -0.053 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 4.25 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
102 -0.304 0.955 0.033 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
103 0 0.735 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
104 -0.958 0.956 1.032 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
105 0 0.735 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
106 0 0.736 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 -0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
107 -0.985 0.956 -1.01 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 -0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
108 -0.305 0.956 -0.034 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 4.5 -2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
109 0 0.736 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 0.167 -2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
110 0 0.848 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
111 0 0.843 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
112 0 0.844 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 -0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
113 0 0.849 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 2.3335 -2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
114 0 0.593 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.628 2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
115 0 0.662 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
116 0 0.593 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.628 0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
117 0 0.661 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
118 0 0.593 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.628 -0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
119 0 0.661 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 -0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
120 0 0.593 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -2.638 -2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK

Page 12 of 13 
 
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF PLEM STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED DESIGN PIPING ARRANGEMENT)
CALCULATION OF MUDMAT FOUNDATION DUE TO MINIMUM COMPRESSION FORCE
Distance to
Base Load Maximum Allowable Pressure
Center of
Eccentricity Pressure (q) with Safety Factor 3
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal A Ix Iz Base Mat
Node Note Chk*d
∑Fy/A ±
ex ez x z (qallow)
Mx/Iz ± Mz/Ix
Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m2 m4 m4 m m m m t/m2 t/m2
121 0 0.663 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -1.2305 -2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
122 -0.508 0.497 0.157 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
123 0.02 0.497 0.119 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
124 0.065 0.498 -0.135 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 -0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
125 -0.504 0.498 -0.165 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -4.5 -2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
126 0 0.543 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
127 0 0.542 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
128 0 0.542 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 -0.85 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
129 0 0.543 0 77 516.4 460.6 0.046 -0.001 -3.564 -2.975 0.536 1 COMPRESSION OK
-6.606 40.73 -0.002 Sliding Force = 6.61 ton
-> OK
Sliding Resistant = 7.13 ton

Page 13 of 13