Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
516 views3 pages

2018 KAIST Undergraduate Letter of Reommendation International

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

APPLICATION NUMBER

Spring & Fall 2018 Undergraduate Admission (International)


LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION Office Use Only
by Academic Advisor, or Homeroom/Math/Science Teacher

 Please type in (Korean or English) and print neatly.

Applicant Information

Name in English

School name : ________________________________________________________


Current or Most Recent
Secondary School Attended
Location : City ________________ Country ________________

Intended Major

Application Track Early 



Regular 

Late 

(Check v) (Submitted by Oct 31, 2017) (Submitted by Jan 10, 2018) (Submitted by Jun 29, 2018)

Recommender Information

Name in English

Position / Title

School Name

School Address
Zip code City Country

Telephone E-mail

I have carefully filled out this evaluation by myself, and I am aware that my opinions provided herein may
continue to serve as a reference in the subsequent admission process within KAIST.

_______________________________________ _______________________________________
Signature Date (yyyy/mm/dd)

 Please return this letter after sealing and signing across the back of the envelope by the document
submission deadline to:

Office of Undergraduate Admissions, KAIST


#108, Yang Bun Soon Bld. (E16-1)
291 Daehak-ro , Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
1
Background Information

How long and in what capacity have you known the applicant? _______________________________________________
How well do you know the applicant?  very well  well  moderately  do not know well
Cumulative GPA: __________ on a __________ scale. This CGPA is  weighted  unweighted.
Highest CGPA in graduating year : ________________
Number of students in graduating year: _______________ students
Applicant’s rank in graduating year: _______________ out of _________________ students
If you do not rank, please indicate applicant’s percentile: top ___________%

Ratings

Please rate the applicant in the table below based on you and other teachers’ evaluation of the applicant.

Best
Exceptional Excellent Good Below No basis for
throughout Average
(top 3%) (top 10%) (top 25%) average judgment
career

Intellectual curiosity

Academic potential

Creative and original thought

Motivation

Diligence

Self-confidence and Leadership

Interpersonal Relationship

Community service

Resilience

Listening/Speaking ability in English

OVERALL

I recommend this student to enthusiastically strongly fairly strongly with reservation


KAIST

I think this student desires to enthusiastically strongly fairly strongly with reservation
attend KAIST

2
Evaluation
1. What are the three adjectives that come to your mind to describe the applicant?
1) __________________, 2) __________________, 3) ____________________

2. Based on your discussion with other teachers, please provide your opinion on the applicant’s potential to become a
scientist or engineer who would contribute to the betterment of society. Please use concrete examples to tell us about
his/her academic ability, intellectual curiosity, creativity, motivation, leadership skills, heart for community service,
interpersonal relationships, reputation among teachers, etc. (300 words or less)

3. Please give constructive criticism of the applicant’s weakness. (100 words or less)

4. In addition to what has been mentioned above, please provide other useful information that would help us better
understand the applicant (e.g. the applicant’s family situation, educational environment, or ways of coping with
adversity, etc.). (200 words or less)

You might also like