MiddleEastAfrJOphthalmol19113-4844325 132723
MiddleEastAfrJOphthalmol19113-4844325 132723
MiddleEastAfrJOphthalmol19113-4844325 132723
226]
Review Article
Retina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2The Vitreo-Retinal and
1
Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 3The Clínica Oftalmológica El Viñedo, Valencia,
Venezuela, 4The Retina and Vitreous Service, Clínica Oftalmológica Centro Caracas, and the Arevalo-Coutinho Foundation for
Research in Ophthalmology, Caracas, Venezuela
Corresponding Author: Dr. J. Fernando Arevalo, Vitreoretinal Division, The King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Al-Oruba Street, PO Box 7191,
Riyadh 11462, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: arevalojf@jhmi.edu
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012 13
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
14 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
a b
c d
Figure 1: Acute anterior uveitis with keratic precipitates, posterior synechiae and Figure 2: Clinical presentation of sympathetic ophthalmia after cyclophotocoagulation:
fibrin on the anterior lens capsule in the right eye of a 25-year-old male, who had (a) diffuse choroiditis with papillitis. (b) Late frame fluorescein angiogram
sustained a penetrating trauma to his left eye 3 months earlier (Reprinted with demonstrating optic disc and subretinal hyperfluorescence in the posterior pole.
permission from BenErza D25) (c) B-scan ultrasound shows exudative retinal detachment OD. (d) Optical coherence
tomography OD demonstrates elevation of the retinal layers with subretinal
hyporeflectivity corresponding with subretinal fluid
a b
c d
Figure 3: Sympathetic ophthalmia after trauma: (a) Posterior pole of the right Figure 4: Fundal white dots in the macular region accompanied by retinal vasculitis
sympathizing eye demonstrating choroidal atrophy. (b) Multiple small Dalen–Fuchs were observed in the right eye of a 33-year-old male, who underwent multiple
nodules can be seen throughout the fundus in this sympathizing eye. Cell infiltrates intraocular surgeries in his left eye. The findings in the right eye were detected
were present in the vitreous. (c) This case was complicated by cataract and refractory 4 weeks after the last surgery in the left eye (Reprinted with permission from
glaucoma. The patient was treated by cataract extraction and trabeculectomy with BenErza D25)
mitomycin C initially followed by an Ahmed valve implant. (d) Exciting phthisical
left eye after trauma
Table 1: Factors that contribute to the development of clinically with a similar clinical picture. Fluorescein angiography (FA)
apparent sympathetic ophthalmia* and indocyanine green video-angiography (ICG-V) are useful
Factor Characteristic adjuncts in establishing the extent and severity of SO.
Type of trauma Penetrating trauma
Surgery Surgical repair 48 h more after initial injury In the acute phase of SO, FA typically demonstrates multiple
Treatment with Use local and systemic for more than a
corticosteroids week after initial injury hyperfluorescent leakage sites at the RPE during the venous phase
Site of penetrating injury Ciliary body that persist into the late frames of the study [Figures 5 and 6].
Ocular inflammation Intensity in the inciting eye There may be spreading of the dye from these areas and, in
Size of wound Larger than 5 mm
Age of patients First decade of life severe cases, pools of the exudates coalesce into large areas of
*Sympathetic ophthalmia. (Reprinted with permission from BenErza D27) exudative retinal detachment.10 The less common appearance
of SO in FA is that of early hypofluorescent lesions and late
studies to establish the diagnosis of SO; however, focused staining similarly to that seen in acute multifocal posterior
clinical testing can be used to rule out other disease entities placoid pigment epitheliopathy.28 The status of the RPE overlying
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012 15
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
Dalen–Fuchs nodules or the integrity of the choriocapillaris is can be found within the choroid, under the RPE or under the
what determines the fluorescence of these lesions. Blockage of neuroretina. Immunohistochemical identification of the cells in
choroidal fluorescence may occur when an intact dome of RPE Dalen–Fuchs nodules demonstrated cells originated mostly from
contains the cellular elements of the Dalen–Fuchs nodules. the reticuloendothelial system (histiocytes, lymphocytes, and de-
Gradual accumulation of fluorescein into Dalen–Fuchs nodules pigmented epithelial cells). The cellular compositions of Dalen–
may produce focal hyperfluorescence [Figure 6b]. However, Fuchs nodules in SO and in sarcoidosis are identical.35,38-40 The
degeneration of the RPE overlying the Dalen–Fuchs nodule RPE generally remains normal in appearance, but it may or
may allow fluorescein dye to permeate focally into the RPE and may not be intact anterior to these nodules. Reynard et al,29
gradually accumulate in the subretinal space.29 Late staining of reported an interesting morphological variation of Dalen–Fuchs
the optic nerve head is sometimes observed, even in the absence nodules in SO. They found three types of lesions at the level
of clinical papillitis or optic nerve head swelling. of the RPE.29 One type was a focal hyperplasia and aggregation
of retinal pigment epithelial cells. The second type, classically
As the disease process predominantly involves the choroid, referred to as Dalen–Fuchs nodules, consisted of epithelioid
ICG-V may be a useful adjunct to fluorescein angiography both cells and lymphocytes covered by an intact dome of RPE. The
for diagnosis and in evaluating the response to treatment. ICG-V third type of lesion was characterized by degeneration of the
studies show multifocal hypofluorescent spots that became more overlying RPE leading to disorganization of the Dalen–Fuchs
prominent as the study progresses. These lesions are thought nodules and possible release of their contents into subretinal
to be reflective of choroidal inflammatory cellular infiltration space. The spectrum of morphological changes occurring at the
and choroidal edema.30,31 level of the RPE is consistent with the Fuchs original hypothesis
that Dalen–Fuchs nodules undergo on evolutionary sequence of
Time domain optical coherence tomography has shown development. Jennings et al,41 suggest that the clinical appearance
disorganization and thinning of the inner retina, and pronounced of Dalen–Fuchs nodules appears to correlate with the severity
disintegration of the RPE and choriocapillaris.32 Fourier Domain of the disease.
OCT is also able to show choroidal and RPE thickening in SO
patients [Figure 6c–f]. ETIOLOGY
B-scan ultrasonography in SO demonstrates marked choroidal The etiology of SO is not clearly understood. Autoimmunity
thickening and retinal detachment in some difficult cases. and cell-mediated immune mechanisms are considered to
play a mediating role in the pathogenesis of SO. However, this
HISTOPATHOLOGY concept is not a new one, having been proposed by Elschnig
in 1910 with uveal pigment being considered a putative
The basic finding in the histopathological analysis of eyes with antigenic stimulus. Elschnig postulated that the injury to the
SO is granulomatous inflammation throughout the uveal tissue, exciting eye resulted in an absorption and dissemination of
except for the choriocapillaris and retinal vessels [Figures 7-9]. uveal pigment, which produced the hypersensitivity reaction
On histopathologic inspection, the yellowish-white choroidal in the injured eye. The continued absorption resulted in an
lesions seen clinically correspond to collections of lymphocytes, allergic reaction in the sensitized tissue of the sympathizing eye.
histiocytes, and de-pigmented RPE cells lying beneath Bruch’s Current evidence suggests that choroidal melanocytes alone as
membrane. Retinal infiltrates have been reported in 18% of an inciting target is considered insufficient to induce SO. The
SO cases.34 Specifically variable degrees of retinal involvement, cell-mediated immunity observed in SO could be directed
including perivasculitis, retinal detachment, and gliosis have been against some uveal antigen,42 a retinal antigen (such as Sag)37 or
described. The inflammatory cells involved in SO are primarily a surface antigen shared by photoreceptors, RPE, and choroidal
lymphocytes, epithelioid cells, and multinucleated giant cells, melanocytes.35 To date, no circulating antibodies directed against
all of which are components of classic granuloma. Occasionally, intraocular tissue have been found. No organism has ever been
eosinophils, neutrophils, and plasma cells may be present.34-36 consistently isolated from eyes with SO, and the disease has
never been incited in animal models following injection of an
Dalen–Fuchs nodules are found in approximately one-third infective agent. Nonetheless, through molecular mimicry of
of enucleated eyes thought to have SO [Figure 8].37 The an endogenous ocular antigen, a bacterial antigen, rather than
fundal white dots are the ophthalmoscopic counterpart of active proliferation of the organism, may be the inciting agent
the choroidal granulomata or Dalen–Fuchs nodules observed in the immune response.43
histologically. The localization of the Dalen–Fuchs nodules is
first and foremost within the choroid, as can be seen in the Albert et al,4 proposed a unified model to explain the pathogenesis
gross specimen of eyes with SO. However, histologic sections of SO. They proposed that since the choroid has no lymphatics,4
and immunostaining demonstrate that Dalen–Fuchs nodules the removal of intravitreal antigen by blood stream, or possibly,
16 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
a b
c d
e f
Figure 5: Fluorescein angiography of the acute phase of sympathetic ophthalmia Figure 6: Sympathetic ophthalmia in the left eye after trauma to the right eye. (a) The
showing multiple hyperfluorescent dots in the mid-periphery with some confluence color fundus photograph demonstrates optic disc edema and hypopigmented round
anteriorly (Reprinted with permission from Damico FM et al.,26) 100-200 µ in size lesions in the posterior pole (Dalen–Fuchs nodules; white arrows).
(b) Fluorescein angiogram shows that the lesions are hyper and hypofluorescent,
and accompanied by choroidal folds inferotemporally. (c–f) Optical coherence
tomography (horizontal scans) characterize the Dalen–Fuchs nodules as fusiform
hypereflective lesions of the RPE (white arrows). Note the hyporeflective outer retina
associated with optic disc edema
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012 17
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
cells. In the retina, the Müeller cells may profoundly suppress performed. If necessary, a vitreous sample must be obtained for
the proliferative response of primed T-helper lymphocytes to diagnostic purposes. Tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, and syphilis are
antigen present on conventional antigen-presenting cells, as well usually accompanied by constitutional signs and symptoms of
as their subsequent interleukin-2-dependent expansion. The the underlying systemic disease. These features, combined with
damage inflicted by the T cells on the uvea is for the most part appropriate testing for tuberculosis (PPD skin testing and chest
focal and slow, and is rarely accompanied by fulminant necrosis. radiograph), sarcoidosis (serum angiotensin-converting enzyme
Histiocytes and epithelioid cells also enter the immunoreactive and lysozyme, and chest radiograph), and syphilis (RPR and
sites adjacent to the uvea and become part of the Dalen–Fuchs FTA-ABS) can distinguish these systemic infections from SO.
nodules. In the same manner, the RPE cells proliferate and
change to become incorporated in the nodules. In cases where It is important to rule out potentially devastating fungal and
T-cells are able to bypass the RPE and enter the retina, retinal bacterial infections, which may evolve rapidly from uveitis to
inflammation and damage may ensue.4 severe endophthalmitis. Post-traumatic iridocyclitis may also
cause an inflammatory reaction. However, neither infection nor
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS iridocyclitis involves the fellow eye.
18 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
immunomodulatory agent. Cyclosporine is initiated at a dose their51 series only two patients (0.3%) developed SO and had
of 5 mg/kg/day and increased until the ocular inflammatory maintained good vision in the sympathizing eye. Savar et al,51
reaction is controlled. Once the disease is in remission for at used Bellan hypothetical calculations51 to find that between
least 3 months, a slow taper (0.5 mg/kg/day every 1–2 months) 908 (assuming a sympathetic ophthalmia rate of 3.1%) and
of cyclosporine can be initiated and progressively substituted 9999 (assuming a SO rate of 0.28%) prophylactic enucleations
by low doses of corticosteroid. Nussenblatt et al,45 reported following open globe injury would need to be performed to
successful use of cyclosporin A in conjunction with prednisone. prevent one case of legal blindness from SO. We recommend
that primary anatomical reconstruction should be performed
Other immunosuppressive agents including chlorambucil, and that should be followed by discussion with the patient and
cyclophosphamide, or azathioprine may also be utilized if family members regarding whether to retain or remove eye.
the inflammatory reaction cannot be adequately controlled
with corticosteroids or cyclosporine. Jennings and Tessler46 Controversy remains with respect to enucleation of the exciting
described favorable results with various combinations of eye after development of SO development for the management
cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and chlorambucil with or of this condition. Kilmartin et al,12 found that once SO develops,
without steroids. Mycophenolate has also been recommended secondary enucleation of the exciting eye to reduce inflammation
for the treatment of refractory panuveitis or posterior uveitis in the sympathizing eye does not necessarily lead to a better
unresponsive to high-dose maintenance steroids (>15 mg/day) visual outcome or to a reduced need for medical therapy.
or other immunosuppressive agents or where toxicity concerns Unfortunately, the time frame necessary to perform prophylactic
exist.47 Dosage is 2 g orally and blood count monitoring is secondary enucleation remains uncertain, as SO has been
necessary. Tacrolimus has also been shown to be effective; reported with secondary enucleation performed as early as
however, renal dysfunction and glucose intolerance should be five days following a penetrating ocular injury.16 In addition, in
monitored.48 Given the more powerful nature and less favorable certain cases the exciting eye may become the better seeing eye
side-effect profile of these agents, collaborative management after chronic or severe SO. However, the pre-existing lack of
with experienced immunology specialists is advisable. vision in previously injured eyes changes the context in which a
subsequent penetrating ocular injury is managed. In this setting,
Atan et al,49 studied whether polymorphisms in the cytokine repairing the injury in order to assess for visual potential is futile,
genes are important markers for disease severity and outcome and primary enucleation may offer the best prophylaxis against
in patients with SO. Their49 results show that cytokine gene SO.16,52,53 Although it would appear that evisceration after severe
polymorphisms are markers for the severity of disease in SO and ocular trauma is a safe option with a very low risk of developing
were found to be associated with recurrence of previously stable SO, it is known that SO may occur due to uveal tissue remaining
disease and with the level of maintenance steroid treatment behind in scleral emissary channels. We suggest the surgeons
required to control inflammation. pay particular attention to the theoretically increased risk of SO
after evisceration versus enucleation.
Recently, Mahajan et al,50 proposed that fluocinolone acetonide
implant provides inflammator y control and reduces the SUMMARY
dependence on systemic immunosuppression in patients with
SO. Sympathetic ophthalmia is a rare and potentially visually
devastating bilateral panuveitis, typically following surgery
PREVENTION or non-surgical penetrating injury to one eye. High index of
suspicion is vital to ensure early diagnosis and initiation of
Surgery prior to disease onset appears to play an important role treatment, thereby allowing good final visual acuity in most
in the prevention of SO. In general, the time frame required for patients. Diverse clinical presentations are possible in SO and
this approach is believed to be within 10 days to 2 weeks from any bilateral uveitis following vitreoretinal surgery should alert
the penetrating injury.1,4 The problem with this approach is the surgeon to the possibility of SO.
that with current advanced surgical techniques, many eyes once
considered nonviable may now have a fair prognosis. Therefore, Although there is no consensus regarding optimal treatment,
current opinion sustains that SO is extremely rare and can be most experts concur that SO requires prompt attention and
effectively treated in most cases. Recently, Savar et al,51 reported treatment. Prompt and effective management with systemic
their experience with enucleation after open globe trauma at immunosuppressive agents may allow control the disease and
the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary center. Among 660 retention of good visual acuity in the remaining eye. Modern
open globe injuries, 55 had undergone enucleation, 11 primary, immunosuppressive therapy with systemic steroids and steroid-
and 44 secondary cases were documented.51 The most common sparing agents such as cyclosporin A and azathioprine have
reason for secondary enucleation was a blind, painful eye.51 In improved the prognosis of SO. However, informed consent for
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012 19
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
vitreoretinal surgery (especially in re-operations) should now of sympathetic ophthalmia in British and Irish patients. Br J
Ophthalmol 2001;85:281-6.
include the risk of SO (approximately 1 in 800).
24. Zaharia MA, Lamarche J, Laurin M. Sympathetic uveitis 66 years
after injury. Can J Ophthalmol 1984;19:240-3.
REFERENCES 25. BenErza D. sympathetic ophthalmia. In: BenErza, editor. Ocular
Inflammation, Basic and Clinical Concepts. London: Martin
1. Lubin JR, Albert DM, Weinstein M. Sixty-five years of Dunitz Ltd; 1999. p. 377-92.
sympathetic ophthalmia: A clinicopathologic review of 105 26. Damico FM, Kiss S, Young LH. Sympathetic ophthalmia. Semin
cases (1913-1978). Ophthalmology 1980;87:109-21. Ophthalmol 2005;20:191-7.
2. Goto H, Rao NA. Sympathetic ophthalmia and Vogt-Koyanagi- 27. Lim WK, Chee SP, Sng I, Nussenblatt RB, Chan CC.
Harada syndrome. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1990;30:279-85. Immunopathology of progressive subretinal fibrosis: Variant
3. Mackenzie W. A practical treatise on the diseases of the eye. of sympathetic ophthalmia. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:475-7.
3rd ed. London: Longmans; 1840. p. 523-34. 28. Casella AM, Farah ME, Martins MC, Hasegawa A, Oguido AP..
4. Albert DM, Diaz Rohena R. A historical review of sympathetic Sympathetic ophthalmia-Histopathologic correlation with
ophthalmia and its epidemiology. Surv Ophthalmol 1989;34:1-14. fluorescein and indocyanine angiography: Case report. Arq
5. Fuchs E. Uber sympathisierende Entzundung (Zuerst Bras Oftalmol 2008;71:886-9.
Bermerkunen uber serose traumatische Iritis). Graefes Arch 29. Reynard M, Riffenburgh R, Minckler D. Morphological variation
Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1905;61:365-456. of Dalen-Fuch nodules in Sympathetic ophthalmia. Br J
6. Dalen A. Zur Kenntnis der sogenannten Choroiditis sympathetica. Ophthalmol 1985,69:197-201.
Mitt Augen Klin Carolin Med. Chirurg Inst Stockholm 1904;6:1. 30. Bernasconi O, Auer C, Zografos L, Herbort CP. Indocyanine
green angiographic findings in sympathetic ophthalmia.
7. Power WJ, Foster CS. Update on sympathetic ophthalmia. Int
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:635-8.
Ophthalmol Clin 1995;35:127-37.
31. Moshfeghi AA, Harrison SA, Ferrone PJ. Indocyanine green
8. Gass JD. Sympathetic ophthalmia following vitrectomy. Am J
angiography findings in sympathetic ophthalmia. Ophthalmic
Ophthalmol 1982;93:552-8.
Surg Lasers Imaging 2005;36:163-6.
9. Makley TA, Azar A. Sympathetic ophthalmia: A long-term
32. Galagher MJ, Yilmaz T, Cervantes-Castaneda RA, Foster CS.
follow-up. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:257-62.
The characteristic features of Optical Coherence Tomography
10. Marak GE. Recent advances in sympathetic ophthalmia. Surv
in Posterior uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2007,91:1680-5.
Ophthalmol 1979;24:141-56.
33. Evans M. Oftalmia Simpatica. In: Arevalo JF, Graue-Wiechers
11. Gomi CF, Makdissi FF, Yamamoto JH, Olivalves E. An
F, Quiroz-Mercado H, Rodríguez FJ, Wu L, editors. Uveitis y
epidemiologic study on uveitis. Rev Med (Sao Paulo)
Tumores Intraoculares: Temas Selectos. Caracas, Venezuela:
1997;76:101-8.
AMOLCA; 2008.
12. Kilmartin DJ, Dick AD, Forrester JV. Prospective surveillance
34. Croxatto JO, Rao NA, McLean IW, Marak GE. Atypical
of sympathetic ophthalmia in the UK and Republic of Ireland.
histopathologic features in sympathetic ophthalmia: A study
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:259-63.
of a hundred cases. Int Ophthalmol 1982;4:129-35.
13. Liddy N, Stuart J. Sympathetic ophthalmia in Canada. Can J
35. Jakobiec FA, Marboe CC, Knowles DM, Iwamoto T, Harrison
Ophthalmol 1972;7:157-9. W, Chang S, et al. Human sympathetic ophthalmia: An analysis
14. Holland G. About indications and time for surgical removal of of the inflammatory infiltrate by hybridoma-monoclonal
an injured eye. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1964;145:732-40. antibodies, immunochemistry, and correlative electron
15. Fankhauser F, Kwasniewska S, Van der Zypen E. Cyclodestructive microscopy. Ophthalmology 1983;90:76-95.
procedures, I: Clinical and morphological aspects: A review. 36. Kaplan HJ, Waldrep JC, Chan WC, Nicholson JK, Wright JD.
Ophthalmologica 2004;218:77-95. Human sympathetic ophthalmia: Immunologic analysis of the
16. Bilyk JR. Enucleation, evisceration, and sympathetic ophthalmia. vitreous and uvea. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:240-4.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2000;11:372-86. 37. Rao NA, Robin J, Hartmann D, Sweeney JA, Marak GE Jr.
17. Ozbek Z, Arikan G, Yaman A, Oner H, Bajin MS, Saatci AO. The role of the penetrating wound in the development of
Sympathetic ophthalmia following vitreoretinal surgery. Int sympathetic ophthalmia experimental observations. Arch
Ophthalmol 2010;30:221-7. Ophthalmol 1983;101:102-4.
18. Cha DM, Woo SJ, Ahn J, Park KH. A case of sympathetic 38. Font RL, Fine BS, Messmer E, Rowsey JF. Light and electron
ophthalmia presenting with extraocular symptoms and microscopic study of Dahlen-Fuchs nodules in sympathetic
conjunctival pigmentation after repeated 23-gauge vitrectomy. ophthalmia. Ophthalmology 1983;90:66-75.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2010;18:265-7. 39. Chan CC, BenEzra D, Rodrigues MM, Palestine AG, Hsu SM,
19. Dada T. Kumar A, Sharma N. Sympathetic Ophthalmia Murphree AL, et al. Immunohistochemistry and electron
associated with antecedent adherent leucoma: A rare microscopy of choroidal infiltrates and Dahlen-Fuchs nodules
association. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:380-1. in sympathetic ophthalmia. Ophthalmology 1985;90:580-90.
20. Eason HA. Sympathetic ophthalmia associated with malignant 40. Chan CC, BenEzra D, Hsu MS, Palestine AG, Nussenblatt RB.
Melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1963;70:786-90. Granulomas in sympathetic ophthalmia and sarcoidosis. Arch
21. Fries PD, Char DH, Crawford JB, Waterhouse W. Sympathetic Ophthalmol 1985;103:198-202.
Ophthalmia complicating helium ion irradiation of a choroidal 41. Jennings T, Tessler HH. Twenty cases of sympathetic
melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1561-4. ophthalmia. Br J Ophthalmol 1989;73:140-5.
22. Davis JL, Mittal KK, Freidlin V, Mellow SR, Optican DC, Palestine 42. Reynard M, Riffenburgh RS, Maes EF. Effect of corticosteroid
AG, et al. HLA associations and ancestry in Vogt-Koyanagi- treatment and enucleation on the visual prognosis of
Harada disease and sympathetic ophthalmia. Ophthalmology sympathetic ophthalmia. Am J Ophthalmol 1983;96:290-4.
1990;97:1137-42. 43. Hammer H. Lymphocyte transformation test in sympathetic
23. Kilmartin DJ, Wilson D, Liversidge J, Dick AD, Bruce J, ophthalmitis and the Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. Br J
Acheson RW, et al. Immunogenetics and clinical phenotype Ophthalmol 1971;55:850-2.
20 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, May 30, 2018, IP: 202.80.214.226]
44. Al-Halafi A, Dhibi HA, Hamade IH, Bou Chacra CT, Tabbara KF. Dick AD, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphism in sympathetic
The association of systemic disorders with Vogt-Koyanagi- ophthalmia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4245-50.
Harada and sympathetic ophthalmia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp 50. Mahajan VB, Gehrs KM, Goldstein DA, Fischer DH, Lopez JS,
Ophthalmol 2011;249:1229-33. Folk JC. Management of sympathetic ophthalmia with the
45. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC. Cyclosporin A therapy fluocinolone acetonide implant. Ophthalmology 2009;116:552-7.
in the treatment of intraocular inflammatory disease resistant 51. Savar A, Andreoli MT, Kloek CE, Andreoli CM. Enucleation for
to systemic corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents. Am J open globe injury. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:595-600.
Ophthalmol 1983;96:275-82. 52. Bellan L. Sympathetic ophthalmia: A case report and review
46. Tessler HH, Jennings T. High-dose short-term chlorambucil for of the need for prophylactic enucleation. Can J Ophthalmol
intractable sympathetic ophthalmia and Behcet’s disease. Br J 1999;34:95-8.
Ophthalmol 1990;74:353-7. 53. Hollander DA, Jeng BH, Stewart JM. Penetrating ocular injuries
47. Lau CH, Comer M, Lightman S. Long-term efficacy of in previously injured blind eyes: Should we consider primary
mycophenolate mofetil in the control of severe intraocular enucleation? Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:438.
inflammation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;31:487-91.
48. Ishioka M, Ohno S, Nakamura S, Isobe K, Watanabe N, Cite this article as: Arevalo JF, Garcia RA, Al-Dhibi HA, Sanchez JG,
Suarez-Tata L. Update on sympathetic Ophthalmia. Middle East Afr J
Ishigatsubo Y, et al. FK506 treatment of noninfectious uveitis.
Ophthalmol 2012;19:13-21.
Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:723-9.
Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
49. Atan D, Turner SJ, Kilmartin DJ, Forrester JV, Bidwell J,
Announcement
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 19, Number 1, January - March 2012 21