Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

The Moynihan Report

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The Moynihan Report: An Annotated

Edition
A historian unpacks The Negro Family: The Case for National Actionon its 50th anniversary.

On New Year’s Eve, 1964, Assistant Secretary of Labor Daniel Patrick Moynihan
assembled his staff in his office to announce that they were going to help him write a
report on African American families. The Negro Family: The Case for National Action,
completed in March, 1965, became one of the most controversial documents of the
twentieth century. Best known as the “Moynihan Report,” it launched the career of its
author, who became a professor at Harvard University, a top adviser to President Nixon,
and a four-term U.S. senator representing New York.

Moynihan wrote the report on his own initiative hoping to persuade White House officials
that civil-rights legislation alone would not produce racial equality. He succeeded in getting
President Johnson’s attention. On June 4, 1965, President Lyndon Johnson gave a major
address at Howard University based largely on the Moynihan Report and co-written by
Moynihan and Richard Goodwin. Echoing civil-rights leaders of the time, Johnson
declared, “Freedom is not enough”: Equal citizenship for African Americans was
incomplete without the ability to make a decent living.
However, the Johnson administration quickly disowned the Moynihan Report when it
sparked heated debate after becoming public in August, 1965. Distracted by the Vietnam
War, Johnson never followed up his stirring rhetoric at Howard with significant new
policies. The Moynihan Report became a lightning rod for civil-rights activists frustrated
with Johnson’s inaction.

Moreover, the report’s ambiguities and contradictions as well as Moynihan’s decision to discuss racial
inequality primarily in terms of family structure produced confusion over its aims. Many liberals
understood the report to advocate new policies to alleviate race-based economic inequalities. But
conservatives found in the report a convenient rationalization for inequality; they argued that only
racial self-help could produce the necessary changes in family structure. Some even used the report
to reinforce racist stereotypes about loose family morality among African Americans. Meanwhile, left-
wing critics attacked Moynihan for distracting attention from ongoing systemic racism by focusing on
African Americans’ family characteristics: Moynihan’s leading critic, William Ryan, famously charged
him with “blaming the victim.”

The Moynihan Report is a historical artifact best understood in the context of its time. Yet it remains
relevant today amidst current discussion of why racial inequality persists despite the passage of civil-
rights legislation. Even those who do not see the report’s analysis as pertinent to the present can
learn how it shaped contemporary discourse. Fifty years later, the Moynihan Report is still a
contested symbol among American thinkers and policymakers, cited by everyone from Barack
Obama to Paul Ryan. Earlier this month, New York City’s police commissioner and mayor
publicly sparred over the report with the former calling it “prescient” and the latter dismissing it as
outdated. Liberals and conservatives alike praise the report’s analysis, but it is still anathema to many
on the Left.

To aid readers interested in exploring the report and the issues it raises, The Atlantic is
publishing this annotated copy of The Negro Family. Please note that this version differs
from the original in that many of the report’s tables and charts are not reproduced.
he Negro Family:
The Case For National Action

Office of Policy Planning and Research


United States Department of Labor

The United States is approaching a new crisis in race relations.

CHAPTERS

I. The Negro American Revolution


II. The Negro American Family
III. The Roots of the Problem
IV. The Tangle of Pathology
V. The Case for National Action

You might also like