Chapter 3 Updated
Chapter 3 Updated
Chapter 3 Updated
Baguio City.
Table 2
Practices/Experiences of Respondents During Disasters
12. How ready are you when you are trapped in the elevator
now?
(103) Not Prepared
(174) Slightly prepared
(79) Much-prepared
(31) Very Much-prepared
13. How Confident are you that you are safe from the
following in the campus?
A. fire
(63) Not Confident
(134) Slightly Confident
(158) Very Confident
(32) Very Much Confident
B. earthquake
(91) Not Confident
(190) Slightly Confident
(83) Very Confident
(23) Very Much Confident
C. bomb threat
(126) Not Confident
(162) Slightly Confident
(63) Very Confident
(36) Very Much Confident
a fire. It was also found out that for those who had
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 68
them took the stairs to get out of the building they are
safe to move.
"And the fact is that we have not made the kind of progress
and workplaces.
causes:
migration.
to human-made disasters.
measures.
Wars and civil strife are among the principal man made
hazards.
Baguio City.
This means that they lack the full knowledge of the proper
shouting for help and had not done anything until the fire
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 76
Table 3. A
Extent of knowledge of the correct practices and
procedures that must be done in case a FIRE breaks
out in the building where you are.
Levels Frequency
Very Knowledgeable 92
(12-15)
Moderately Knowledgeable 281
(8-11)
Slightly Knowledgeable 14
(4-7)
Not Knowledgeable 0
(0-3)
Area Mean 10.31
Moderately Knowledgeable
was put off several hours after. She even mentioned that it
for the next big earthquake affecting the country. This has
Table 3. B
Extent of knowledge of the correct practices and procedures
that must be done in case EARTHQUAKE happens
Levels Total
Very Knowledgeable 74
(12-15)
Moderately Knowledgeable 274
(8-11)
Slightly Knowledgeable 39
(4-7)
Not Knowledgeable 0
(0-3)
Area Mean 9.86
Moderately Knowledgeable
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 78
stakeholders is a must.
process.
evaluated.
If There Is An Explosion:
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 81
responders.
safe location.
possible.
Table 3.C
Extent of knowledge of the correct practices and procedures
that must be done in case there is a BOMB THREAT
Levels Total
Very Knowledgeable 113
(15-17)
Moderately Knowledgeable 263
(10-14)
Slightly Knowledgeable 11
(5-9)
Not Knowledgeable 0
(0-4)
Area Mean 12.01
Moderately Knowledgeable
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 82
telephone)
Police.
switches on or off.
walls.
administrators.
place.
Table 3. D
Extent of knowledge of the correct practices and
procedures that must be done in case you are INSIDE AN
ELEVATOR NOT FUNCTIONING
Levels Total
Very Much Knowledgeable 26
(6 - 7)
Very Knowledgeable 287
(4 - 5)
Slightly Knowledgeable 49
(2 - 3)
Not Knowledgeable 25
(0 - 1)
Area Mean 4.12
Moderately Knowledgeable
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 85
emergency.
elevator.
normally.
power failure.
imminence of danger.
According to Institutions
Table 4 A
Extent of knowledge of the correct practices and procedures that
must be done in case a FIRE breaks out in the building where you
are.
Levels A B C D E
(18) (23) (23) (225) (98)
Very Knowledgeable 2 3 5 69 13
(12-15)
Moderately 13 18 17 155 77
Knowledgeable
(8-11)
Slightly Knowledgeable 2 2 1 1 8
(4-7)
Not Knowledgeable 0 0 0 0 0
(0-3)
Area Mean 8.97 MK 9.67 MK 10.20 MK 10.71MK 9.70MK
Legend: MK – Moderately Knowledgeable
Levels A B C D E
(18) (23) (23) (225) (98)
Very Knowledgeable 4 4 5 41 20
(12-15)
Moderately 12 17 15 168 62
Knowledgeable
(8-11)
Slightly 2 2 3 16 16
Knowledgeable
(4-7)
Not Knowledgeable 0 0 0 0 0
(0-3)
Area Mean 9.94 MK 9.85 MK 10.50 MK 9.94 MK 9.66MK
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 88
Levels A B C D E Total
(18) (23) (23) (225) (98)
VMC 1 8 0 6 11 26
(6 - 7)
VK 15 11 18 173 70 287
(4 - 5)
SK 2 4 4 12 12 49
(2 - 3)
NK 0 0 1 5 5 25
(0 - 1)
Area Mean 4.93 MK 4.85MK 3.98MK 3.98 MK 4.28MK 4.12MK
practices of emergencies.
According to Group
Table 5
Summary Table for ANOVA on Extent of Knowledge About the
Proper Practices and Procedures in Cases of Emergencies
Considering Institutions
Source of Mean Sum of df Estimated F-ratio
Variation Squares Variance
Between 1632.911 4 0.072 0.006
Within 1799.753 15 11.123
TV [α = 0.05, 3.06] Decision: Accept Ho
knowledgeable.
Table 6
Levels A B
(85) (302)
Very Knowledgeable 26 66
(12-15)
Moderately Knowledgeable 58 223
(8-11)
Slightly Knowledgeable 21 13
(4-7)
Not Knowledgeable 0 0
(0-3)
Area Mean 10.68 MK 10.20 MK
Legend MK – Moderately Knowledgeable
Levels A B
(85) (302)
Very Knowledgeable 26 48
(12-15)
Moderately Knowledgeable 59 215
(8-11)
Slightly Knowledgeable 0 39
(4-7)
Not Knowledgeable 0 0
(0-3)
Area Mean 10.72 MK 9.62 MK
Legend MK – Moderately Knowledgeable
Levels A B
(85) (302)
Very Knowledgeable 3 23
(6 - 7)
Moderately Knowledgeable 63 224
(4 - 5)
Slightly Knowledgeable 11 438
(2 - 3)
Not Knowledgeable 8 017
(0 - 1)
Area Mean 3.94 MK 4.18 MK
Legend MK – Moderately Knowledgeable
Table 7
Mean Differences on the Extent of Knowledge About the Proper
Practices and Procedures in Cases of Disasters According to
Group
Group Mean Standard df Computed t-value
Deviation
Employees 9.57 3.896 6 0.111
Students 9.27 3.712
TV[ α = 0.05, df =6] = 1.943 Decision: Accept Ho
respondents.
Table 8
Extent of importance of the disaster preparedness
programs/policies of the institution
and other emergencies can happen at any time, and when they
that they may not know how to deal with it, an educational
According to Institutions
considering institutions.
Table 9
Extent of Importance of the Emergency Preparedness
Programs/Policies of the Institutions Considering
Institutions
Indicators A B C D E
(18) (23) (23) (225) (98)
1. The priorities of Safe School
and Community Environment are
to:
1.1. Mobilize parent, student, 3.72 3.74 3.70 3.66 3.77
local community and school VI VI VI VI VI
staff to champion school
safety
1.2. Schools to prepare and 3.67 3.74 3.75 3.77 3.54
implement school safety VI VI VI VI VI
plans including measures to
be taken both within school
premises and in the
immediate neighbourhood.
This must include regular
safety drills.
1.3. Promote active dialogue and 3.67 3.70 3.65 3.68 3.50
exchange between schools and VI VI VI VI VI
local leaders including
police, civil defence, fire
safety, search and rescue,
medical and other emergency
service providers.
1.4. School children must 3.67 3.65 3.61 3.65 3.68
practise safety measures in VI VI VI VI VI
all aspects and places of
their lives.
Sub-Area Mean 3.68 3.71 3.68 3.69 3.62
VI VI VI VI VI
2. School community/school administrators
and teachers should:
2.1. Ensure teacher and non- 3.72 3.70 3.70 3.71 3.68
teaching staff receives the VI VI VI VI VI
opportunity for training in
disaster risk reduction.
2.2. Ensure active participation 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.62 3.59
of school community including VI VI VI VI VI
children and parents, in
preparing and implementing
school disaster plans and
disaster risk reduction
efforts.
2.3. Be prepared to respond to 3.72 3.70 3.65 3.73 3.66
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 100
emergencies. VI VI VI VI VI
2.4. Encourage and support 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.66 3.54
children to participate in VI VI VI VI VI
spreading disaster risk
reduction knowledge, acting
as bridges to families and
communities.
Sub-Area Mean 3.67 3.66 3.62 3.68 3.62
VI VI VI VI VI
3. Students should
3.1. Learn principles and 3.72 3.70 3.70 3,74 3.63
practices of disaster risk VI VI VI VI VI
reduction.
3.2. Become aware of disaster 3.67 3.65 3.65 3.74 3.69
risks in their own VI VI VI VI VI
community and how to reduce
them.
3.3. Participate in preparing and 3.72 3.74 3.70 3.73 3.67
implementing school VI VI VI VI VI
disaster plans and risk
reduction efforts.
3.4. Participate in drills and 3.67 3.70 3.61 3.76 3.60
appropriate response to VI VI VI VI VI
early warning available in
their school or community.
3.5. Participate as bridges to 3.72 3.74 3.70 3.72 3.63
spread disaster risk VI VI VI VI VI
reduction knowledge to
families and communities.
Sub-Area Mean 3.70 3.71 3.67 3.74 3.64
VI VI VI VI VI
Over-All Mean 3.68 3.69 3.66 3.70 3.63
VI VI VI VI VI
very important.
Baguio City.
Table 10
Summary Table for ANOVA on Extent of Importance of the
Emergency Preparedness Programs/Policies of the
Institutions Considering Institutions
memoranda of agreements.
industry collaboration.
According to Group
Table 11
Extent of Importance of the Emergency Preparedness
Programs/Policies of the Institutions Considering Group
in the academe.
to encounter.
in a disaster due to the fact that they may not know how to