Social and Emotional Impairment in Children and Adolescents With ADHD and The Impact On Quality of Life 8
Social and Emotional Impairment in Children and Adolescents With ADHD and The Impact On Quality of Life 8
Social and Emotional Impairment in Children and Adolescents With ADHD and The Impact On Quality of Life 8
Keywords: aLilly Deutschland, Medical Department, Bad Homburg, Germany bDepartment of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical School,
Syracuse, New York cMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina Manuscript received March 25, 2009; manuscript
accepted September 30, 2009
This review provides an overview as to how the social and emotional impairments involved in Atten- tion-Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder affect the quality of life of patients and their families. A model of three categories into which the emotional difficulties
fall, and how they impair quality of life, is also presented. Ó 2010 Society for Adolescent Medicine. All rights reserved.
This review is based on a search of the published data relating to these topics. Several electronic databases (e.g.,
PubMed, Medline) were searched. Furthermore, textbooks on ADHD and related topics [8,9,13,35,36] were
reviewed. The relevant publications were carefully studied for informa- tion relating to social and emotional
impairment in children with ADHD and its effect on QoL.
This review begins with a discussion of the social impair- ment involved in ADHD, followed by a discussion of
emotional impairment. Then a new model is introduced ex- plaining how deficits in executive function and self-
regula- tion result in impairment of emotional well-being. Three categories by which the social and emotional
problems can be classified are defined: (a) the problems inherent in the disorder, (b) those related to comorbidity, (c)
and those secondary to the impact of these two factors on the social environment. Then, the topic of transition from
childhood to adolescence (and adulthood) is addressed and the impact of social and emotional impairment on quality
of life is discussed. The review closes with clinical implications and conclusions.
Social Impairment
The social impairments associated with ADHD have been investigated with various questionnaires, sociometric
assess- ments, and videotaped interactions [19]. Children and adoles- cents with ADHD are known to have poorer
social and communication skills than children and adolescents without ADHD [37]. The social difficulties tend to be
even greater if comorbid disorders such as oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) or conduct disorder (CD) are
present, which is the case in approximately 60% of these individuals [38–40]. Children and adolescents with ADHD
and comorbid ODD tend to have more severe ADHD symptoms, peer problems, and family distress as compared
with children with ADHD alone [41].
Relationships and activities within the family can be impaired [17,42], and in some cases family relationships can
break down, bringing additional social and financial diffi- culties [25], causing children to feel sad or show
oppositional or aggressive behavior [31].
The relationship between parents and children with ADHD is associated with more conflicts and is considerably
more stressful than the parent-child relationship in families without a family member affected by ADHD [13,42].
Parental stress is worsened by the presence of ODD or CD [13]. Although parents may often be commanding and
hostile, adolescents with ADHD tend to be less responsive, more hostile, and more avoidant toward their parents.
Parents
may be more lax in their discipline of adolescents on some occasions, whereas being very harsh on others. Conflicts
between adolescents and their parents are more likely to arise regarding friends, school, appearance, chores, driving,
alcohol, tobacco and drug use, leisure time activities, bedtime, and even the type of music that is heard and the
volume at which it is played[13]. Interestingly, there is some support for the hypothesis that moderate noise facili-
tates cognitive performance [43].
Children and adolescents with ADHD have problems with peer relationships [44,45], lack friendships [46], or have
limi- tations in their activities with friends if they do have friends [17]. More than half of these children and
adolescents have serious problems with peer relationships. These problems are a result of the children’s and
adolescents’ inability to effectively participate in social exchanges such as sharing, cooperating, and turn
taking [13]. Children and adolescents with ADHD often interact with their peers in a self-centered, impulsive,
intrusive, commanding, and hostile behavior. As a result, up to 70% of these children with ADHD may have no
close friends by third grade, especially if they have comor- bid ODD or CD. Adolescents with ADHD also usually
demonstrate less sharing, cooperation, or turn-taking [13]. They tend to be more intrusive, disruptive of ongoing
social interactions of others, or will show off and clown around more in social settings. They also tend to express
their anger and frustration, especially when provoked, more than others and show reduced empathy and guilt.
Children and adolescents with ADHD are rated lower on social preference, are less well liked, are more often
rejected, are more likely to be designated ‘‘non-friends’’ by their peers, and have fewer reciprocal friends [47]. A
particularly impor- tant aspect of peer relationships is the presence of reciprocal friendships [19]. Such friendships
seem to be fairly indepen- dent of acceptance or rejection by peers [46] and are impor- tant for the well-being and
psychosocial adjustment of the individual [47–49].
Children with ADHD are more likely to affiliate with deviant peer groups if social rejection continues into adoles-
cence [13]. The social problems are most serious in the subgroup of adolescents with ADHD and comorbid ODD or
CD. These adolescents are more likely to be bullied and to become bullies themselves. They are more likely to be
beaten up or assaulted with a weapon by late adolescence [13]. Girls have an increased risk of being sexually
abused [8,13].
Although adolescents with ADHD do not have a higher incidence of sexual disorders, they do begin sexual activity
at an earlier age [13]. They have more sexual partners and spend less time with each partner. They have more casual
sex outside a relationship and are less likely to use contracep- tion. As a result, boys and girls with ADHD are at
greater risk of being involved in teenage pregnancies, and the ratio for the
number of births before the age of 20 years is markedly greater (37:1). Adolescents with ADHD also have a four
times higher risk for sexually transmitted diseases and show riskier sexual behavior in general than do adolescents
without ADHD [13].
Emotional Impairment
The emotional impairments of children and adolescents with ADHD may include poor self-regulation of emotion,
greater excessive emotional expression, especially anger and aggression, greater problems coping with frustration,
reduced empathy, and decreased arousal to stimulation [13]. In the United States, more than one-third of children
with ADHD were reported to have high levels of emotional difficulties [30]. A study from Europe clearly showed
that children and adolescents with ADHD have more emotional problems as measured by the Strengths and
Difficulties Questionnaire than children and adolescents without ADHD [44,45]. Boys with ADHD and comorbid
ODD or CD have, in particular, been reported to suffer from impaired regulation of negative emotions [50–52].
However, ADHD not only has a negative effect on the emotional well-being of the affected child or adolescent, but
affects the family as a whole [13]. The presence of a child or adolescent with ADHD in the family results in
increased disturbance in family and marital functioning [25].
ADHD is known to be related to poor self-esteem, both in children and adolescents as well as in young adults,
particularly in the subset that is at risk for major depression [16–18,26,53–55]. Self-esteem can be defined as a
person’s positive or negative attitude toward himself or herself [35] and has been considered a central construct in
psychological theory, with ‘‘self-competence’’ and ‘‘self-liking’’ as consti- tutive dimensions of self-
esteem [56,57]. Children and adolescents with ADHD are said to have poorer self-percep- tion [37]. A distorted
sense of self and disruption of the normal development of self have been reported by adolescents with ADHD [58].
A number of concepts related to self-esteem have been identified: self-confidence, self-depreciation [59], self-
concept, self-perception, self- image, self-worth [60], and (global) academic and social self-esteem [54]. Genetic and
environmental determinants of self-esteem have also been investigated [61,62], but no specific determinants of low
self-esteem have been identified.
Anxiety or depression are also common comorbid disor- ders of ADHD [17,63–69]. Children with anxiety disorder
tend to worry excessively about their competence or the quality of their performance, they may be tense and chroni-
cally anxious, quick to panic and in constant need of reassur- ance, or they may be extremely shy and socially
phobic, avoiding interactions with unfamiliar persons [1,10]. Adoles- cents with ADHD and comorbid anxiety may
present a complicated clinical picture[10]. Children and adolescents with (comorbid) depression may be profoundly
unhappy,
with weeks and months of being unable to find any real pleasure, even in activities that were once enjoyable [10].
The unhappiness may manifest as a persistently irritable mood. Dysthymia may be present in adolescents.
Symptoms such as hypersomnia or hyposomnia, excessive or insuffi- cient appetite, marked loss of energy, and
feelings of worth- lessness may indicate the presence of comorbid major depression [1,10].
The emotional difficulties associated with ADHD can be classified as falling into the following three categories:
ADHD may involve significant disruption to the brain’s executive functioning (EF) system which is believed to
underlie the human capacity for self-organization and goal-directed actions, or self-regulation [13]. Among the
commonly recognized components of the EF system are inhibition, working memory (verbal and nonverbal), gener-
ativity (fluency, goal-directed inventiveness), and self- regulation of emotion [13]. Individuals with ADHD are less
able to moderate or otherwise manipulate or suppress the emotional reactions they experience. Consequently, they
are likely to show more impulsive and hence more extreme or severe emotional reactions toward events than do
others of their age. This emotional dysregulation has been considered an important part of the conceptualization of
ADHD [13]. Research shows that the difficulties with emotional control load on the same dimension with the
hyperactive and impulsive symptoms, and likely arise from the poor inhibitory capacity involved in ADHD [8,70].
Other psychiatric disorders are often associated with child and adult ADHD, many of which involve difficulties with
emotion. For instance, most of the children with ADHD are likely to develop ODD, which involves difficulties with
the expression of anger, hostility, frustration, and aggression toward others, especially to authorities such as parents,
besides problems such as disobedience. Likewise, 25% or more of children with ADHD may also develop CD [13].
Among a subset of these patients, childhood psychopathy or the presence of callousness, lack of emotion, low
empathy for others, and little if any guilt associated with transgressions are likely to occur [13,71,72]. Children and
adults with ADHD are also more likely to develop dysthymia, major depressive disorder, and various anxiety
disorders, all of which involve difficulties with emotion. The reasons for such high comorbidity with other disorders
are several [64] and may include a common etiology, such as shared genetic risks or exposure to repeated social
stressors. These disorders may arise from separate sources beyond the deficit in emotional self-regulation [13].
ADHD is often associated with significant difficulties in adaptive functioning, particularly in educational, family,
community, and other social settings that radiate into other domains by adulthood (occupation, marital functioning,
driving, money management, etc.) [8]. Experiences such as academic failure, peer rejection, family conflict, parental
hostility, accidental injuries, poor occupational achievement, marital strife, or loss of driving license, can all result in
emotional consequences. These emotional consequences add to the emotional problems that are part of ADHD and/
or possible comorbid disorders already [13].
Keeping these three categories in mind may be useful for subsequent research and clinical management of these
emotional problems. They can be useful in devising specific interventions for the various emotional problems and
may offer a new perspective on the area of emotional impairment in patients with ADHD.
Transition to adolescence is associated with a number of issues that affect the adolescent’s body, behavior, and
social interactions [13]. This transition touches upon most areas of the adolescent’s daily life and involves an
increase in physical size and maturation (including neurological and sexual matu- ration), the desire to individuate
from parents, with a resulting decrease in the influence of parents on the adolescent’s behavior, an increase in the
time spent away from home, an increase in the number of life activities to which the adoles- cent must adapt
(interaction with peers, sexuality, driving, community activities, earning money, coming to terms with drug use and
crime), and greater involvement with peers [13]. Most of these issues are adversely affected by the delay in self-
regulation that is usually associated with ADHD. Impaired self-esteem and sociability in adolescents is often the
result [73].
Many studies have shown that the symptoms of ADHD change during adolescence and development into
adulthood [12,74,75]. Hyperactivity, for example, although still present, may become much less prominent during
this age period [76], whereas attention-deficit, distractibility, and disorganization persist and may even become more
common or at least more impairing[9,10]. Thus, hyperactivity declines more steeply than does inattention and
deficits in EF related to inat- tention [13]. Motor restlessness may become a more internal- ized subjective sense of
feeling a need to be busy all the time. Symptoms of inattention and impaired EF have a greater effect on school
functioning than the symptoms of hyperac- tivity and impulsivity. This trend increases with age. Impul- sivity is
more related to functional impairment in non-academic domains and may be associated with the devel- opment of
ODD, drug experimentation, speeding while
driving, engaging in risky sexual behavior, taking on dares from peers, impulsive verbal behavior, and reactive
aggres- sion[13]. However, inattention can result in further impair- ments: poor attention to traffic density and speed
limits while in community traffic settings, greater risk for pedestrian or cycling accidents, greater car crash risk,
accelerated use of nicotine, poor follow-through on chores and other responsi- bilities at home, poorer work
performance in employment settings, and inattention to the needs and comments of others during social
activities [13]. Likewise, the deficits in EF also have a negative effect on the development of adolescents with
ADHD. The poor working memory may result in less follow through on commitments and promises to others and
may result in comprehension deficits when reading, listening, or viewing, especially in school or work settings.
Impaired plan- ning, anticipation, and preparatory behavior are likely to result in the adolescent not being ready for
the future as it arrives [13]. Future rewards are less valued, and so the adoles- cent shows poor delay of gratification
and does not persist toward future goals. Poor inhibition results in poor regulation of emotions, with deficient
control of anger and frustration being the most impairing problems in this respect [13]. Furthermore, EF deficits
result in decreased fluency, i.e. the rapid assembly of ideas into coherent verbal reports and behavior [13]. Thus, a
broad range of problems related to reward dysfunction, delay aversion, timing dysfunction, and motivation plays an
important role in the context of EF [77,78].
Most definitions and measures of QoL include physical, psychological, and social domains, although similar
domains are often labeled differently. Although there is general agree- ment over these three major domains, they
have been subdi- vided in many different ways, resulting in the development of a broad range of questionnaires and
psychometric instru- ments that, however, are difficult to compare [79]. Despite these methodological difficulties,
several ‘‘generic’’ QoL instruments can be used to study QoL in children and
adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Such instruments include the Child Health Questionnaire [84], the Pediatric
Quality of Life Inventory [24,85], the Child Health and Illness Profile [86,87]), or the KIDSCREEN-27 [88]. An
interesting recent instrument is the International Classifica- tion of Functioning, Disease, and Health which was
devel- oped by the World Health Organization to assess the degree of disability caused by disease or disorder [89].
The International Classification of Functioning, Disease, and Health has been used to assess the level of functioning
in children and adolescents with ADHD[90].
Thus, QoL has become an increasingly important measure of outcome in child and adolescent mental health research
and clinical practice [81]. There is broad agreement among researchers and clinicians based on research findings that
ADHD is associated with significant impairment of psycho- social functioning that goes beyond the core symptoms
of attention-deficit, hyperactivity, and impulsivity [19–21], an example for which are children with ADHD who are
restricted in their school work or other daily activities as a result of the behavioral and emotional problems [17].
These and other impairments generally have a considerable effect on the patient’s emotional and social well-being
as well as the quality of life (QoL) [17,25–30,91,92]. Deficits in emotional stress regulation also seem to have a
direct effect on QoL [92]. ADHD has a comparable overall effect on QoL in comparison with other psychiatric
disorders or severe physical disorders [81].
There is increasing evidence that QoL improves with effective treatment [81]. For example, the QoL of children and
adolescents with ADHD has been shown to improve over time when on medication [16,18,93–99]. More specifi-
cally, a number of studies have shown the improvement of self-esteem in children and adolescents with treatment
for ADHD. One such study showed significantly greater short- term improvements of self-esteem in a sample
treated with atomoxetine [16], whereas another study showed improve- ments of self-esteem in the long-term [18].
In these two studies, self-esteem was measured using the Child Health Questionnaire. Obviously, self-esteem was
seen to be closely related to the concept of QoL.
Both ADHD and related disruptive behavior disorders such as ODD and CD have been investigated from dimen-
sional as well as categorical perspectives. Both types of exter- nalizing behavior patterns may be related in
fundamental ways to the problem of inhibitory control as well as to behav- ioral and emotional dysregulation [100].
The ability to control emotion seems to involve interactions between pre-frontal and cingulate regions of the cortex
as well as subcortical regions of the brain[101,102].
Many subjects with ADHD have deficits in terms of EF as assessed by rating scales. It is therefore likely that some
of the emotional dysregulation seen in ADHD arises from this
central problem with EF and especially those components involved in emotional inhibition and emotional and
motiva- tional self-regulation. In turn, some problems with emotional regulation seem to be present only in subjects
with ADHD who are also extremely aggressive or psychopathic. This can be taken as evidence for a possible
disconnection between the EF deficits that involve emotional self-regulation and emotional difficulties associated
with some comorbid disorders. A deficit in inhibitory control is the focus of another widely recognized
psychopathological model for ADHD [13]. This deficit is seen to be the underlying symptom of broader deficits in
EF, which then result in the broad range of dysfunctional behavior in ADHD. This model proposes a link between
response inhibition and four other distinct EFs that depend on inhibitory control: (a) working memory, (b) verbal
working memory, (c) self-regulation of affect/motivation/arousal, and (d) behavioral analysis and synthesis
(reconstitution). These four functions serve to bring behavior under the control of internally represented informa-
tion and allow self-directed actions to goals specifically, and the anticipated future more generally. Thus, the four
func- tions along with inhibition facilitate greater goal-oriented action and persistence on tasks. The deficit in
inhibitory control impairs self-regulation of emotions and also explains the cognitive difficulties that children and
adolescents with ADHD have [13]. This model characterizes a considerable proportion of individuals with ADHD,
especially those with the combined type [103].
A third source of emotional difficulties in ADHD cases arises from the consequences of ADHD and the impairments
it produces in significant domains of major life activities. Demoralization, learned helplessness, low self-esteem,
fear and anxiety, increased frustration, and other emotional prob- lems can arise as a result of the adverse effect
ADHD is likely to have on daily adaptive functioning and social, educational, and occupational success among other
domains.
In the face of the multiple problems associated with ADHD, the importance of treating the disorder effectively and
as early as possible is evident. A broad range of effective therapeutic options, including counseling and parent
training, psychotherapeutic approaches such as behavioral therapy, as well as pharmacotherapy, with a range of
stimu- lant and nonstimulant medications, is available [13]. Among the available nonpharmacological treatment
options, educa- tion of parents, other family members, and teachers about the disorder; parent training in effective
behavior manage- ment methods; classroom behavior modification methods; and special education placement are
those interventions that have the greatest promise for treating children and adolescents with ADHD [104].
Psychosocial interventions that have been shown to be effective in managing ADHD in adolescents include
Behavioral Parent Training, teacher training in classroom behavior management, Summer Treat- ment Program, and
contingency management methods applied in classrooms and other settings such as summer camp [105].
Furthermore, there are reasons to be optimistic
about Cognitive Behavioral Therapy being more effective in adolescents than in children with ADHD [105].
Interventions for ADHD will be most helpful when they assist with the performance of a particular behavior at the
place and time of performance in the natural environment where and when such behavior is usually
performed [104]. Consequently, it is important to provide assistance with the time, timing, and timeliness of
behavior. To be effective in altering eventual prognosis, treatment must be maintained over extended time (months
to years), with interventions occurring periodically in the long term [104].
Any psychosocial treatment option should be a part of a multimodal treatment plan that will often include medica-
tion [106]. This perspective is supported by the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD which
investigated the long-term effectiveness of ADHD interventions (medica- tion, behavior modification) alone or in
combination, as compared with standard community care [107,108]. Medica- tion (either alone or in combination
with behavior modifica- tion) was shown to be superior to behavior modification alone or standard community care.
The study also suggested that combination treatment is superior to behavior modifica- tion alone or standard
community care in terms of outcomes that go beyond core symptoms of ADHD, such as opposi- tional or aggressive
behavior, internalizing symptoms, social skills, parent-child relations, and academic achievement [107,108]. In
summary, the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD shows that medication alone may be the best
treatment option [105]. For those adolescents, however, who suffer from ADHD with comorbid opposi- tional
symptoms, poor social functioning, and negative or ineffective parenting, a combination of medication (in this case
methylphenidate) and behavior modification seems the best treatment option [105]. Another study, however, re-
vealed no advantage of a combination of behavior modifica- tion and methylphenidate over methylphenidate alone
in terms of academic performance or emotional state [93].
Both the stimulant methylphenidate [109–111] and the nonstimulant atomoxetine [36,112,113] have been shown to
be effective in treating core symptoms of ADHD in both children and adolescents. The long-acting medications and
formulations (both stimulant and nonstimulant) have become increasingly widely used [114]. Academic
achievement and the emotional well-being have been shown to improve with methylphenidate treatment [93], and
both stimulants and atomoxetine have been shown to improve the QoL in chil- dren and adolescents with
ADHD [81,97–99,115–117]. Mixed amphetamine salts, known to be effective in children and adolescents [118],
have been shown to improve the QoL in adults with ADHD [119]. These findings are encouraging and suggest that
QoL outcomes should be included as a matter of course in future medication studies [81].
Selecting the right medication for a particular patient is the task of the clinician treating the patient. However, in
light of the differences between the various medications in terms of efficacy profile, mode of action, or tolerability
profile, these
differences should be considered when planning pharmaco- logical treatment. Although stimulants may be
particularly effective in treating situational impairments (e.g. difficulties with sustaining attention at school) [120],
the nonstimulant atomoxetine may be especially helpful in terms of improving various situations outside the school
setting (e.g. interactions with family members or peers) [117]. By selecting the right medication, the physician can
optimize the treatment of chil- dren and adolescents with ADHD by finding the medication that is most likely to
meet the needs of the individual patient. Although the long-term outcome of treatment with different medications
has been questioned [121–123], the long acting medications for ADHD remain promising treatment options in this
respect [114,124].
Acknowledgments/Disclosure
Peter M. Wehmeier and Alexander Schacht are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Russell A. Barkley has
worked as consultant and speaker for Eli Lilly and Company and Shire, and as a speaker for Medice, Janssen-Cilag,
and Novartis, and has received honoraria from these companies.
References
[1] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Wash-
ington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
[2] Faraone SV, Sergeant J, Gillberg C, et al. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: Is it an American condition? World Psychiatry 2003;2: 104–
12.
[5] TeicherMH,AndersenSL,NavaltaCP,etal.Neuropsychiatricdisor- ders of childhood and adolescence. In: Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, eds. The
American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing,
2002:1069–119.
[6] World Health Organization (WHO). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Clinical descriptions and diag- nostic
guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.
[7] Goos LM, Crosbie J, Payne S, et al. Validation and extension of the endophenotype model in ADHD patterns of inheritance in a family study
of inhibitory control. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:711–7.
[8] Barkley RA, Murphy KR, Fischer M. ADHD in Adults: What the Science Says. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, 2008.
[9] Wender PH. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[10] Wender PH, Wolf LE, Wasserstein J. Adults with ADHD: An overview. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;931:1–16.
[11] Kessler RC, Adler LA, Barkley R, et al. Patterns and predictors of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder persistence into adulthood. Results
from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:1442–51.
[12] Wolraich ML, Wibbelsman CJ, Brown TE, et al. Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder among adolescents: a review of the diagnosis,
treatment, and clinical implications. Pediatrics 2005;115:1734–46.
13. [13] Barkley RA. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. 3rd edition. New York,
NY: Guilford Press, 2006.
14. [14] Thompson MJ, Brooke XM, West CA, et al. Profiles, co-morbidity and their relationship to treatment of 191 children with
AD/HD and their families. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004;13:234–42.
15. [15] Swanson JM. Role of executive function in ADHD. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64(Suppl 14):35–9.
16. [16] Perwien AR, Faries DE, Kratochvil CJ, et al. Improvement in health- related quality of life in children with ADHD: An
analysis of placebo controlled studies of atomoxetine. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2004;25:264–71.
17. [17] Escobar R, Soutullo CA, Hervas A, et al. Worse quality of life for children with newly diagnosed attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder, compared with asthmatic and healthy children. Pediatrics 2005;116:e364–9.
18. [18] Perwien AR, Kratochvil CJ, Faries DE, et al. Atomoxetine treatment in children and adolescents with attention-deficit
hyperactivity disorder: What are the long-term health-related quality-of-life outcomes? J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol
2006;16:713–24.
19. [19] Barkley RA. Major life activity and health outcomes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin
Psychiatry 2002; 63(Suppl 12):10–5.
20. [20] Nijmeijer JS, Minderaa RB, Buitelaar JK, et al. Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and social dysfunctioning. Clin
Psychol Rev 2008;28:692–708.
21. [21] Escobar R, Hervas A, Soutullo CA, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperac- tivity disorder: Burden of the disease according to
subtypes in recently diagnosed children [Editorial]. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2008;36:285–94.
22. [22] Brook U, Boaz M. Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and learning disabilities (LD): Adolescents
perspective. Patient Educ Couns 2005;58:187–91.
23. [23] Karande S, Bhosrekar K, Kulkarni M, et al. Health-related quality of life of children with newly diagnosed specific learning
disability. J Trop Pediatr 2009;55:160–9.
24. [24] Varni JW, Burwinkle TM. The PedsQL as a patient-reported outcome in children and adolescents with Attention-
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A population-based study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:26.
25. [25] Johnston C, Mash EJ. Families of children with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: Review and recommendations for
future research. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2001;4:183–207.
26. [26] Sawyer MG, Whaites L, Rey JM, et al. Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with mental disorders. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41:530–7.
27. [27] Klassen AF, Miller A, Fine S. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-
deficit/hyperac- tivity disorder. Pediatrics 2004;114:e541–7.
28. [28] Matza LS, Rentz AM, Secnik K, et al. The link between health-related quality of life and clinical symptoms among children
with attention- deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2004;25:166–74.
29. [29] Riley AW, Spiel G, Coghill D, et al. Factors related to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) among children with ADHD
in Europe at entry into treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;15(Suppl 1):i38–45.
30. [30] Strine TW, Lesesne CA, Okoro CA, et al. Emotional and behavioral difficulties and impairments in everyday functioning
among children with a history of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prev Chronic Dis 2006;3:A52.
31. [31] Harpin VA. The effect of ADHD on the life of an individual, their family, and community from preschool to adult life. Arch
Dis Child 2005;90(Suppl 1):i2–7.
32. [32] Thorell LB, Rydell AM. Behaviour problems and social competence deficits associated with symptoms of attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Effects of age and gender. Child Care Health Dev 2008; 34:584–95.
33. [33] Coghill D, Soutullo C, d’Aubuisson C, et al. Impact of attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the patient and family:
results from a European survey. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2008; 28(2):31.
[34] Buitelaar JK, Wilens TE, Zhang S, et al. Comparison of symptomatic versus functional changes in children and adolescents with ADHD
during randomized, double-blind treatment with psychostimulants, atomoxetine, or placebo. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009;50:335–42.
[35] Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.
[36] Becker K, Wehmeier PM, Schmidt MH. The Noradrenergic Trans- mitter System in ADHD. Principles and Implications for Treatment.
Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme, 2006.
[37] Klimkeit I, Graham C, Lee P, et al. Children should be seen and heard. Self-report of feelings and behavior in primary-school-age children
with ADHD. J Atten Disord 2006;10:181–91.
[38] Fischer M, Barkley RA, Edelbrock CS, et al. The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children diagnosed by research criteria: II. Academic,
attentional, and neuropsychological status. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990;58:580–8.
[39] Pfiffner LJ, McBurnett K, Lahery BB, et al. Association of parental psychopathology to the comorbid disorders of boys with attention-
deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999;67: 881–93.
[40] Wilens TE, Biederman J, Brown S, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity and functioning in clinically-referred preschool. children and school-age
youth with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41: 262–8.
[41] Kuhne M, Schachar R, Tannock R. Impact of comorbid oppositional or conduct problems on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36:1715–25.
[42] Schreyer I, Hampel P. [ADHD among boys in childhood: quality of life and parenting behavior][Article in German]. Z Kinder Jugendpsy-
chiatr Psychother 2009;37:69–75.
[43] So ̈ derlund G, Sikstro ̈ m S, Smart A. Listen to the noise: Noise is bene- ficial for cognitive performance in ADHD. J Child Psychol
Psychiatry 2007;48:840–7.
[44] Coghill D, Spiel G, Baldursson G, et al. Which factors impact on clini- cian-rated impairment in children with ADHD? Eur Child Adolesc
Psychiatry 2006;15(Suppl 1):i307.
[45] Becker A, Steinhausen HC, Baldursson G, et al. Psychopathological screening of children with ADHD: Strengths and Difficulties Ques-
tionnaire in a pan-European study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;15(Suppl 1):i56–62.
[46] Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, et al. Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. Int Rev Psychiatry 2003;15:185–7.
[47] Hoza B, Mrug S, Gerdes AC, et al. What aspects of peer relationships are impaired in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?
Psychol 1981;9:465–82.
[49] Gresham FM, MacMillan DL, Bocian KM, et al. Comorbidity of
hyperactivity-impulsivity-inattention and conduct problems: Risk factors in social, affective, and academic domains. J Abnorm Child Psychol
1998;26:393–406.
[50] Braaten EB, Rose ́n LA. Self-regulation of affect in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and non-ADHD boys: Differences in
empathic responding. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:313–21.
[51] Melnick SM, Hinshaw SP. Emotion regulation and parenting in AD/ HD and comparison boys: Linkages with social behaviors and peer
preference. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2000;28:73–86.
[52] Treuting JJ, Hinshaw SP. Depression and self-esteem in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Associations with comorbid
aggression and explanatory attributional mechanisms. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2001;29:23–39.
[53] Hechtman L, Weiss G, Perlman T. Hyperactives as young adults: self-esteem and social skills. Can J Psychiatry 1980;25:478–83.
[54] Alston CY, Romney DM. A comparison of medicated and nonmedi-
[78] Rubia K, Smith AB, Halari R, et al. Disorder-specific dissociation of orbitofrontal dysfunction in boys with pure conduct disorder during
reward and ventrolateral prefrontal dysfunction in boys with pure ADHD during sustained attention. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:83–94.
[79] Coghill D, Danckaerts M, Sonuga-Barke E, et al. Practitioner review: quality of life in child mental health - Conceptual challenges and prac-
tical choices. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009;50:544–61.
[80] Wallander JL, Schmitt M, Koot HM. Quality of life measurements in children and adolescents: Issues, instruments, and applications. J Clin
Psychol 2001;57:571–85.
[81] Danckaerts M, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Banaschewski T, et al. The quality of life of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A
systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
[82] Leidy NK, Revicki DA, Geneste B. Recommendations for evaluating the validity of quality of life claims for labeling and promotion. Value
Health 1999;2:113–27.
[83] Revicki DA, Osoba D, Fairclough D, et al. Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promo- tional
claims in the United States. Qual Life Res 2000;9:887–900.
[84] Landgraf JM, Abetz LN, Ware JE. The CHQ Users Manual. Boston, MA: Health Act, 1999.
[85] Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales
in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 2001;39:800–12.
[86] Riley AW, Forrest CB, Rebok GW, et al. The Child Report Form of the CHIP-Child Edition: Reliability and validity. Med Care 2004;
42:221–31.
[87] Riley AW, Forrest CB, Starfield B, et al. The Parent Report Form of the CHIP-Child Edition: Reliability and validity. Med Care 2004;42:
210–20.
[88] Ravens-Sieberer U, Auquier P, Erhart M, et al. The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric
results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Qual Life Res 2007;16:1347–56.
[89] World Health Organization. International Classification of Func- tioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2001.
[90] U ̈ stu ̈ n TB. Using the international classification of functioning, disease and health in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Sepa- rating
the disease from its epiphenomena. Ambul Pediatr 2007; 7(Suppl 1):132–9.
[91] Topolski TD, Edwards TC, Patrick DL, et al. Quality of life of adoles- cent males with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Atten
Disord 2004;7:163–73.
[92] Hampel P, Desman C. Stressverarbeitung und Lebensqualita ̈t bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivi- ta ̈
tssto ̈ rung. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr 2006;55:425–43.
[93] Hechtman A, Abikoff H, Klein RG, et al. Academic achievement and emotional status of children with ADHD treated with long-term meth-
ylphenidate and multimodal psychosocial treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004;43:812–9.
[94] Brown RT, Perwien A, Faries DE, et al. Atomoxetine in the manage- ment of children with ADHD: Effects on quality of life and school
functioning. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2006;45:819–27.
[95] Matza LS, Stoeckl MN, Shorr JM, et al. Impact of atomoxetine