PSA 705 Revised Clean
PSA 705 Revised Clean
PSA 705 Revised Clean
Paragraphs
Introduction
Scope of this PSA ................................................................................................................ 1
Form and Content of the Auditor’s Report When the Opinion Is Modified .......................... 16 29−
Determining the Type of Modification to the Auditor’s Opinion ............................................ A13 A16
−
Form and Content of the Auditor’s Report When the Opinion Is Modified .......................... A1 7 A26
−
Philippine Standard on Auditing (PSA) 705 (Revised), Modifications to the Opinion in the
Independent Auditor’s Report, should be read in conjunction with PSA 200, Overall Objectives of the
Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Philippine Standards on
Auditing.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Introduction
1. This Philippine Standard on Auditing (PSA) deals with the auditor’s responsibility to issue an
appropriate report in circumstances when, in forming an opinion in accordance with PSA 700
(Revised),1 the auditor concludes that a modification to the auditor’s opinion on the financial
statements is necessary. This PSA also deals with how the form and content of the auditor’s
report is affected when the auditor expresses a modified opinion. In all cases, the reporting
requirements in PSA 700 (Revised) apply, and are not repeated in this PSA unless they are
explicitly addressed or amended by the requirements of this PSA.
(b) The auditor’s judgment about the pervasiveness of the effects or possible effects of the
matter on the financial statements. (Ref: Para. A1)
Effective Date
3. This PSA is effective for audits of financial statements for periods ending on or after December 15,
2016.
Objective
4. The objective of the auditor is to express clearly an appropriately modified opinion on the financial
statements that is necessary when:
(a) The auditor concludes, based on the audit evidence obtained, that the financial
statements as a whole are not free from material misstatement; or
(b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that
the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement.
Definitions
5. For purposes of the PSAs, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
(a) Pervasive – A term used, in the context of misstatements, to describe the effects on the
financial statements of misstatements or the possible effects on the financial statements of
misstatements, if any, that are undetected due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence. Pervasive effects on the financial statements are those that, in the auditor’s
judgment:
(i) Are not confined to specific elements, accounts or items of the financial statements;
(ii) If so confined, represent or could represent a substantial proportion of the financial
statements; or
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Requirements
Circumstances When a Modification to the Auditor’s Opinion Is Required
6. The auditor shall modify the opinion in the auditor’s report when:
(a) The auditor concludes that, based on the audit evidence obtained, the financial
statements as a whole are not free from material misstatement; or (Ref: Para. A2–A7)
(b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that
the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. (Ref: Para. A8–
A1 2)
Qualified Opinion
(b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base
the opinion, but the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements
of undetected misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive.
Adverse Opinion
8. The auditor shall express an adverse opinion when the auditor, having obtained sufficient
appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are
both material and pervasive to the financial statements.
Disclaimer of Opinion
9. The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence on which to base the opinion, and the auditor concludes that the possible effects
on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and
pervasive.
10. The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when, in extremely rare circumstances involving multiple
uncertainties, the auditor concludes that, notwithstanding having obtained sufficient appropriate
audit evidence regarding each of the individual uncertainties, it is not possible to form an opinion
on the financial statements due to the potential interaction of the uncertainties and their possible
cumulative effect on the financial statements.
a qualified opinion or to disclaim an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall request
that management remove the limitation.
12. If management refuses to remove the limitation referred to in paragraph 11 of this PSA, the auditor
shall communicate the matter to those charged with governance, unless all of those charged with
governance are involved in managing the entity,2 and determine whether it is possible to perform
alternative procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
13. If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall determine
the implications as follows:
(a) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive, the auditor shall qualify the
opinion; or
(b) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive so that a qualification of the
opinion would be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the auditor shall:
(i) Withdraw from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or
regulation; or (Ref: Para. A13)
(ii) If withdrawal from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report is not practicable or
possible, disclaim an opinion on the financial statements. (Ref. Para. A14)
14. If the auditor withdraws as contemplated by paragraph 13(b)(i), before withdrawing, the auditor
shall communicate to those charged with governance any matters regarding misstatements
identified during the audit that would have given rise to a modification of the opinion. (Ref: Para.
A1 5)
Form and Content of the Auditor’s Report When the Opinion Is Modified
Auditor’s Opinion
16. When the auditor modifies the audit opinion, the auditor shall use the heading “Qualified Opinion,”
“Adverse Opinion,” or “Disclaimer of Opinion,” as appropriate, for the Opinion section. (Ref: Para.
A17–A19)
2
PSA 260 (Revised), Communication with Those Charged with Governance, paragraph 13
3
PSA 805, Special Considerations—Audits of Single Financial Statements and Specific Elements, Accounts or Items of a
Financial Statement, deals with circumstances where the auditor is engaged to express a separate opinion on one or
more specific elements, accounts or items of a financial statement.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Qualified Opinion
17. When the auditor expresses a qualified opinion due to a material misstatement in the financial
statements, the auditor shall state that, in the auditor’s opinion, except for the effects of the
matter(s) described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section:
(a) When reporting in accordance with a fair presentation framework, the accompanying financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects [...] in accordance with [the applicable
financial reporting framework]; or
(b) When reporting in accordance with a compliance framework, the accompanying financial
statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with [the applicable
financial reporting framework].
When the modification arises from an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the
auditor shall use the corresponding phrase “except for the possible effects of the matter(s) ...” for the
modified opinion. (Ref: Para. A20)
Adverse Opinion
18. When the auditor expresses an adverse opinion, the auditor shall state that, in the auditor’s
opinion, because of the significance of the matter(s) described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion
section:
(a) When reporting in accordance with a fair presentation framework, the accompanying financial
statements do not present fairly [...] in accordance with [the applicable financial reporting
framework]; or
(b) When reporting in accordance with a compliance framework, the accompanying financial
statements have not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with [the
applicable financial reporting framework].
Disclaimer of Opinion
19. When the auditor disclaims an opinion due to an inability to obtain suff icient appropriate audit
evidence, the auditor shall:
(a) State that the auditor does not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements;
(b) State that, because of the significance of the matter(s) described in the Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion section, the auditor has not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
to provide a basis for an audit opinion on the financial statements; and
(c) Amend the statement required by paragraph 24(b) of PSA 700 (Revised), which indicates
that the financial statements have been audited, to state that the auditor was engaged to audit
the financial statements.
(a) Amend the heading “Basis for Opinion” required by paragraph 28 of PSA 700 (Revised) to
“Basis for Qualified Opinion,” “Basis for Adverse Opinion,” or “Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion,” as appropriate; and
(b) Within this section, include a description of the matter giving rise to the modification.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
21. If there is a material misstatement of the financial statements that relates to specific amounts in
the financial statements (including quantitative disclosures in the notes to the financial
statements), the auditor shall include in the Basis for Opinion section a description and
quantification of the financial effects of the misstatement, unless impracticable. If it is not
practicable to quantify the financial effects, the auditor shall so state in this section. (Ref: Para.
A22)
22. If there is a material misstatement of the financial statements that relates to narrative disclosures,
the auditor shall include in the Basis for Opinion section an explanation of how the disclosures are
misstated.
23. If there is a material misstatement of the financial statements that relates to the non-disclosure of
information required to be disclosed, the auditor shall:
(a) Discuss the non-disclosure with those charged with governance;
(b) Describe in the Basis for Opinion section the nature of the omitted information; and
(c) Unless prohibited by law or regulation, include the omitted disclosures, provided it is
practicable to do so and the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence about
the omitted information. (Ref: Para. A23)
24. If the modification results from an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the
auditor shall include in the Basis for Opinion section the reasons for that inability.
25. When the auditor expresses a qualified or adverse opinion, the auditor shall amend the statement
about whether the audit evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for the
auditor’s opinion required by paragraph 28(d) of PSA 700 (Revised) to include the word
“qualified” or “adverse”, as appropriate.
26. When the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor’s report shall not
include the elements required by paragraphs 28(b) and 28(d) of PSA 700 (Revised). Those
elements are:
(a) A reference to the section of the auditor’s report where the auditor’s responsibilities are
described; and
(b) A statement about whether the audit evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for the auditor’s opinion.
27. Even if the auditor has expressed an adverse opinion or disclaimed an opinion on the financial
statements, the auditor shall describe in the Basis for Opinion section the reasons for any other
matters of which the auditor is aware that would have required a modification to the opinion, and
the effects thereof. (Ref: Para. A24)
Description of Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements When the Auditor
Disclaims an Opinion on the Financial Statements
28. When the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial statements due to an inability to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall amend the description of the auditor’s
responsibilities required by paragraphs 38–40 of PSA 700 (Revised) to include only the following:
(Ref: Para. A25)
(a) A statement that the auditor’s responsibility is to conduct an audit of the entity’s financial
statements in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing and to issue an auditor’s
report;
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Opinion section, the auditor was not able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
provide a basis for an audit opinion on the financial statements; and
(c) The statement about auditor independence and other ethical responsibilities required by
paragraph 28(c) of PSA 700 (Revised).
30. When the auditor expects to modify the opinion in the auditor’s report, the auditor shall
communicate with those charged with governance the circumstances that led to the expected
modification and the wording of the modification. (Ref: Para. A27)
***
Financial statements
are materially Qualified opinion Adverse opinion
misstated
Inability to obtain
sufficient appropriate Qualified opinion Disclaimer of opinion
audit evidence
A2. PSA 700 (Revised) requires the auditor, in order to form an opinion on the financial statements,
to conclude as to whether reasonable assurance has been obtained about whether the financial
statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. 5 This conclusion takes into account
the auditor’s evaluation of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements in
accordance with PSA 450.6
4
PSA 701, Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report, paragraphs 11–13
5
PSA 700 (Revised), paragraph 11
6
PSA 450, Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit, paragraph 11
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
A3. PSA 450 defines a misstatement as a difference between the amount, classification,
presentation, or disclosure of a reported financial statement item and the amount, classification,
presentation, or disclosure that is required for the item to be in accordance with the applicable
financial reporting framework. Accordingly, a material misstatement of the financial statements
may arise in relation to:
A4. In relation to the appropriateness of the accounting policies management has selected, material
misstatements of the financial statements may arise when:
(a) The selected accounting policies are not consistent with the applicable financial reporting
framework; or
(b) The financial statements, including the related notes, do not represent the underlying
transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
A5. Financial reporting frameworks often contain requirements for the accounting for, and
disclosure of, changes in accounting policies. Where the entity has changed its selection of
significant accounting policies, a material misstatement of the financial statements may arise
when the entity has not complied with these requirements.
(a) When management has not applied the selected accounting policies consistently with the
financial reporting framework, including when management has not applied the selected
accounting policies consistently between periods or to similar transactions and events
(consistency in application); or
(b) Due to the method of application of the selected accounting policies (such as an
unintentional error in application).
(a) The financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by the
applicable financial reporting framework;
(b) The disclosures in the financial statements are not presented in accordance with the
applicable financial reporting framework; or
(c) The financial statements do not provide the disclosures necessary to achieve fair
presentation.
Nature of an Inability to Obtain Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence (Ref: Para. 6(b))
A8. The auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence (also referred to as a
limitation on the scope of the audit) may arise from:
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
A9. An inability to perform a specific procedure does not constitute a limitation on the scope of the
audit if the auditor is able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence by performing
alternative procedures. If this is not possible, the requirements of paragraphs 7(b) and 9–10
apply as appropriate. Limitations imposed by management may have other implications for the
audit, such as for the auditor’s assessment of fraud risks and consideration of engagement
continuance.
A10. Examples of circumstances beyond the control of the entity include when:
The entity’s accounting records have been destroyed.
The accounting records of a significant component have been seized indefinitely by
governmental authorities.
A11. Examples of circumstances relating to the nature or timing of the auditor’s work include when:
The entity is required to use the equity method of accounting for an associated entity, and
the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the latter’s
financial information to evaluate whether the equity method has been appropriately
applied.
The timing of the auditor’s appointment is such that the auditor is unable to observe the
counting of the physical inventories.
The auditor determines that performing substantive procedures alone is not sufficient, but
the entity’s controls are not effective.
A12. Examples of an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence arising from a limitation
on the scope of the audit imposed by management include when:
Management prevents the auditor from observing the counting of the physical inventory.
Management prevents the auditor from requesting external confirmation of specific
account balances.
A1 3. The practicality of withdrawing from the audit may depend on the stage of completion of the
engagement at the time that management imposes the scope limitation. If the auditor has
substantially completed the audit, the auditor may decide to complete the audit to the extent
possible, disclaim an opinion and explain the scope limitation within the Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion section prior to withdrawing.
A14. In certain circumstances, withdrawal from the audit may not be possible if the auditor is required by
law or regulation to continue the audit engagement. This may be the case for an auditor that is
appointed to audit the financial statements of public sector entities. It may also be the case in
jurisdictions where the auditor is appointed to audit the financial statements covering a specific
period, or appointed for a specific period and is prohibited from withdrawing before the completion of
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
the audit of those financial statements or before the end of that period, respectively. The auditor may
also consider it necessary to include an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report.7
A1 5. When the auditor concludes that withdrawal from the audit is necessary because of a scope
limitation, there may be a professional, legal or regulatory requirement for the auditor to
communicate matters relating to the withdrawal from the engagement to regulators or the entity’s
owners.
Other Considerations Relating to an Adverse Opinion or Disclaimer of Opinion (Ref: Para. 15)
A16. The following are examples of reporting circumstances that would not contradict the auditor’s
adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion:
The expression of a disclaimer of opinion regarding the results of operations, and cash
flows, where relevant, and an unmodified opinion regarding the financial position (see PSA
5109). In this case, the auditor has not expressed a disclaimer of opinion on the financial
statements as a whole.
Form and Content of the Auditor’s Report When the Opinion Is Modified
A17. Illustrations 1 and 2 in the Appendix contain auditor’s reports with qualified and adverse
opinions, respectively, as the financial statements are materially misstated.
A18. Illustration 3 in the Appendix contains an auditor’s report with a qualified opinion as the auditor is
unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. Illustration 4 contains a disclaimer of opinion
due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about a single element of the
financial statements. Illustration 5 contains a disclaimer of opinion due to an inability to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence about multiple elements of the financial statements. In each of
the latter two cases, the possible effects on the financial statements of the inability are both material
and pervasive. The Appendices to other PSAs that include reporting requirements, including PSA 570
(Revised),10 also include illustrations of auditor’s reports with modified opinions.
7
PSA 706 (Revised), Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor’s Report,
paragraph A10
8
See paragraph A31 of PSA 700 (Revised) for a description of this circumstance.
9
PSA 510, Initial Audit Engagements―Opening Balances, paragraph 10
10
PSA 570 (Revised), Going Concern
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
A21. Consistency in the auditor’s report helps to promote users’ understanding and to identify unusual
circumstances when they occur. Accordingly, although uniformity in the wording of a modified
opinion and in the description of the reasons for the modification may not be possible, consistency in
both the form and content of the auditor’s report is desirable.
A22. An example of the financial effects of material misstatements that the auditor may describe
within the Basis for Opinion section in the auditor’s report is the quantification of the effects on
income tax, income before taxes, net income and equity if inventory is overstated.
A23. Disclosing the omitted information within the Basis for Opinion section would not be practicable
if:
(a) The disclosures have not been prepared by management or the disclosures are
otherwise not readily available to the auditor; or
(b) In the auditor’s judgment, the disclosures would be unduly voluminous in relation to the
auditor’s report.
A24. An adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion relating to a specific matter described within the
Basis for Opinion section does not justify the omission of a description of other identified
matters that would have otherwise required a modification of the auditor’s opinion. In such
cases, the disclosure of such other matters of which the auditor is aware may be relevant to
users of the financial statements.
Description of Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements When the Auditor
Disclaims an Opinion on the Financial Statements (Ref: Para. 28)
A25. When the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial statements, the following statements are
better positioned within the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
section of the auditor’s report, as illustrated in Illustrations 4–5 of the Appendix to this PSA:
The statement required by paragraph 28(a) of PSA 700 (Revised), amended to state that the
auditor’s responsibility is to conduct an audit of the entity’s financial statements in accordance
with PSAs; and
The statement required by paragraph 28(c) of PSA 700 (Revised) about independence and
other ethical responsibilities.
Considerations When the Auditor Disclaims an Opinion on the Financial Statements (Ref: Para. 29)
A26. Providing the reasons for the auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
within the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of the auditor’s report provides useful
information to users in understanding why the auditor has disclaimed an opinion on the financial
statements and may further guard against inappropriate reliance on them. However,
communication of any key audit matters other than the matter(s) giving rise to the disclaimer of
opinion may suggest that the financial statements as a whole are more credible in relation to
those matters than would be appropriate in the circumstances, and would be inconsistent with
the disclaimer of opinion on the financial statements as a whole. Accordingly, paragraph 29 of
this PSA prohibits a Key Audit Matters section from being included in the auditor’s report when
the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial statements, unless the auditor is otherwise
required by law or regulation to communicate key audit matters.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
A27. Communicating with those charged with governance the circumstances that lead to an expected
modification to the auditor’s opinion and the wording of the modification enables:
(a) The auditor to give notice to those charged with governance of the intended modification(s)
and the reasons (or circumstances) for the modification(s);
(b) The auditor to seek the concurrence of those charged with governance regarding the facts of
the matter(s) giving rise to the expected modification(s), or to confirm matters of disagreement
with management as such; and
(c) Those charged with governance to have an opportunity, where appropriate, to provide the
auditor with further information and explanations in respect of the matter(s) giving rise to the
expected modification(s).
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Appendix
(Ref: Para. A17–A18, A25)
In our opinion, except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of
our report, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as at December 31, 20X1, and (of) its financial performance and its cash
flows for the year then ended in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs).
1
PSA 600, Special Considerations—Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Comp
2
PSA 210, Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
3
The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the second sub-title
“Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value, an amount of xxx would have been required to
write the inventories down to their net realizable value. Accordingly, cost of sales would have been
increased by xxx, and income tax, net income and shareholders’ equity would have been reduced by xxx,
xxx and xxx, respectively.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs). Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in [jurisdiction], and we have fulfilled
our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence
we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial
Statements4
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 1 in PSA 700 (Revised).]
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 1 in PSA 700 (Revised).]
[Auditor Address]
[Date]
4
Throughout the illustrative auditor’s reports, the terms management and those charged with governance may need to be
replaced by another term that is appropriate in the context of the legal framework in the particular jurisdiction.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for Adverse Opinion
section of our report, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not present fairly the
consolidated financial position of the Group as at December 31, 20X1, and (of) its consolidated financial
performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Philippine
Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs).
5
The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the
second sub-title “Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
We conducted our audit in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs). Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance
with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in
[jurisdiction], and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
adverse opinion.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Consolidated
Financial Statements6
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 2 in PSA 700 (Revised).]
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 2 in PSA 700
(Revised).]
[Date]
6
Or other terms that are appropriate in the context of the legal framework in the particular jurisdiction
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Illustration 3 – Qualified Opinion due to the Auditor’s Inability to Obtain Sufficient Audit Evidence
Regarding a Foreign Associate
For purposes of this illustrative auditor’s report, the following circumstances are assumed:
Audit of a complete set of consolidated financial statements of a listed entity using a fair
presentation framework. The audit is a group audit of an entity with subsidiaries (i.e., PSA 600
applies).
The consolidated financial statements are prepared by management of the entity in accordance
with PFRSs (a general purpose framework).
The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility for the
consolidated financial statements in PSA 210.
The auditor was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding an investment in
a foreign associate. The possible effects of the inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence are deemed to be material but not pervasive to the consolidated financial statements
(i.e., a qualified opinion is appropriate).
The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are those of the jurisdiction.
Based on the audit evidence obtained, the auditor has concluded that a material uncertainty does
not exist related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern in accordance with PSA 570 (Revised).
Key audit matters have been communicated in accordance with PSA 701.
Those responsible for oversight of the consolidated financial statements differ from those responsible
for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
In addition to the audit of the consolidated financial statements, the auditor has other reporting
responsibilities required under local law.
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of ABC Company and its subsidiaries (the Group),
which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 20X1, and the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and
consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial
statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, except for the possible effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion
section of our report, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Group as at December 31, 20X1, and (of) its consolidated financial
performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Philippine
Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs).
7
Or other terms that are appropriate in the context of the legal framework in the particular jurisdiction
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
The Group’s investment in XYZ Company, a foreign associate acquired during the year and
accounted for by the equity method, is carried at xxx on the consolidated statement of financial
position as at December 31, 20X1, and ABC’s share of XYZ’s net income of xxx is included in ABC’s
income for the year then ended. We were unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about
the carrying amount of ABC’s investment in XYZ as at December 31, 20X1 and ABC’s share of XYZ’s
net income for the year because we were denied access to the financial information, management,
and the auditors of XYZ. Consequently, we were unable to determine whether any adjustments to
these amounts were necessary.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs). Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance
with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in
[jurisdiction], and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
qualified opinion.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our
audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the
context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion
thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter described in
the Basis for Qualified Opinion section, we have determined the matters described below to be the key
audit matters to be communicated in our report.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Consolidated
Financial Statements8
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 2 in PSA 700 (Revised).]
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 2 in PSA 700
(Revised).]
[Auditor Address]
[Date]
8
Or other terms that are appropriate in the context of the legal framework in the particular jurisdiction
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Illustration 4 – Disclaimer of Opinion due to the Auditor’s Inability to Obtain Sufficient Appropriate Audit
Evidence about a Single Element of the Consolidated Financial Statements
For purposes of this illustrative auditor’s report, the following circumstances are assumed:
Audit of a complete set of consolidated financial statements of an entity other than a listed entity
using a fair presentation framework. The audit is a group audit of an entity with subsidiaries (i.e.,
PSA 600 applies).
The consolidated financial statements are prepared by management of the entity in accordance
with PFRSs (a general purpose framework).
The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility for the
consolidated financial statements in PSA 210.
The auditor was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about a single element of
the consolidated financial statements. That is, the auditor was also unable to obtain audit
evidence about the financial information of a joint venture investment that represents over 90% of
the entity’s net assets. The possible effects of this inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence are deemed to be both material and pervasive to the consolidated financial statements
(i.e., a disclaimer of opinion is appropriate).
The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are those of the jurisdiction.
Those responsible for oversight of the consolidated financial statements differ from those responsible
for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
A more limited description of the auditor’s responsibilities section is required.
In addition to the audit of the consolidated financial statements, the auditor has other reporting
responsibilities required under local law.
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Group.
Because of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our
report, we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit
opinion on these consolidated financial statements.
9
The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the
second sub-title “Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Company’s auditors’ audit documentation. As a result, we were unable to determine whether any
adjustments were necessary in respect of the Group’s proportional share of XYZ Company’s assets that it
controls jointly, its proportional share of XYZ Company’s liabilities for which it is jointly responsible, its
proportional share of XYZ’s income and expenses for the year, and the elements making up the
consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated cash flow statement.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Consolidated
Financial Statements10
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 2 in PSA 700 (Revised).]
We are independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our
audit of the financial statements in [jurisdiction], and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with these requirements.
[Auditor Address]
[Date]
0
1
Or other terms that are appropriate in the context of the legal framework of the particular jurisdiction
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Illustration 5 – Disclaimer of Opinion due to the Auditor’s Inability to Obtain Sufficient Appropriate Audit
Evidence about Multiple Elements of the Financial Statements
For purposes of this illustrative auditor’s report, the following circumstances are assumed:
Audit of a complete set of financial statements of an entity other than a listed entity using a fair
presentation framework. The audit is not a group audit (i.e., PSA 600, does not apply).
The financial statements are prepared by management of the entity in accordance with PFRSs (a
general purpose framework).
The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility for the
financial statements in PSA 210.
The auditor was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about multiple elements of
the financial statements, that is, the auditor was also unable to obtain audit evidence about the
entity’s inventories and accounts receivable. The possible effects of this inability to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence are deemed to be both material and pervasive to the financial
statements.
The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are those of the jurisdiction.
Those responsible for oversight of the financial statements differ from those responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements.
A more limited description of the auditor’s responsibilities section is required.
In addition to the audit of the financial statements, the auditor has other reporting responsibilities
required under local law.
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of the Company. Because of the
significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our report, we have
not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion on
these financial statements.
1
The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the second sub-title
“Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
PSA 705 (REVISED), MODIFICATIONS TO THE OPINION IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
in the process of rectifying the system deficiencies and correcting the errors. We were unable to
confirm or verify by alternative means accounts receivable included in the statement of financial
position at a total amount of xxx as at December 31, 20X1. As a result of these matters, we were
unable to determine whether any adjustments might have been found necessary in respect of
recorded or unrecorded inventories and accounts receivable, and the elements making up the
statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial
Statements12
[Reporting in accordance with PSA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 1 in PSA 700 (Revised).]
Our responsibility is to conduct an audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with
Philippine Standards on Auditing and to issue an auditor’s report. However, because of the matters
described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our report, we were not able to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion on these financial statements.
We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our
audit of the financial statements in [jurisdiction], and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with these requirements.
[Date]
2
1
Or other terms that are appropriate in the context of the legal framework of the particular jurisdiction