Witchcraftsurvey Download
Witchcraftsurvey Download
Witchcraftsurvey Download
Database Documents
I. DATABASE DESCRIPTION
INTRODUCTION
The following document is a description and guide to the layout and design of the
‘Survey of Scottish Witchcraft’ database. It is divided into two sections. In the first
section appropriate terms and concepts are defined in order to afford accuracy and
precision in the discussion of complicated relationships encompassed by the database.
This includes relationships between accused witches and their accusers, different
accused witches, people and prosecutorial processes, and cultural elements of
witchcraft belief and the processes through which they were documented. The second
section is a general description of how the database is organised. Please see the
document ‘Description of Database Fields’ for a full discussion of every field in the
database, including its meaning, use and relationships to other fields and/or tables.
Three entity models (overview, case attributes and trial attributes) which are graphic
descriptions of the table structure of the database are also included to provide a visual
map of the database and all the table connections.
DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS
The following is a list of terms and concepts that the research team used and refined
in the course of designing the database and entering the data. This list contains two
types of entries. Some of the entries are terms or concepts that we used to articulate
difficult technical relationships contained in the database. The rest are terms related
to our data – witchcraft accusations. It was necessary to fix some concepts that are
readily used in the scholarship of early modern witchcraft, but which do not always
have precise meanings. The list is in alphabetical order. The project has refined,
defined and used many other terms and concepts not included in this list because each
field needed a precise definition. For a fuller discussion of this kind of detail, please
see ‘Database Field Definitions’.
Accused Witch – A person denounced for witchcraft, for whom we have evidence
indicating that action (ecclesiastical, civil or both) was pursued.
Blank field – A field that is left blank indicates that the information is ‘unknown.’
We will not type ‘unknown’ as an option in any of the fields.
Case - The witchcraft case follows the series of events and specific accusations
that emerged from a denunciation of a person accused for witchcraft that was
pursued by either ecclesiastical and/or civil authorities. The case encompasses the
beginning (i.e. initial denunciation or supposed denunciation), middle (i.e. the
investigation, arrest and trial of an accused witch), and end (i.e. the way the case
ended in dropped charges, a verdict of innocence, or execution) of a witchcraft
accusation. The ‘case’ does not only refer to a trial or trial process but also
includes references to cultural beliefs about witchcraft practice that were found in
3
the documents. It should also be pointed out that ‘case’ refers to one individual
who was accused of witchcraft. The term does not refer to a series of trials in a
large witch-hunt.
Dead Fields – A ‘Dead Field’ is a field into which limited or no data was entered
due to improper fit with the source material. When the database was designed we
created fields for a full range of material that we thought we might find. However
during the course of data entry, we discovered that some of the fields (and tables)
did not correspond to the data. It would be too difficult to remove them, so we
decided to disregard them. A future researcher could use these fields for their own
purposes. See ‘Database Field Types’.
Objective Fields – An ‘Objective Field’ is one where the data entered was not
open to interpretation. This kind of field includes things like date, verdict, or
mention of a specific word or concept. Essentially, this is a field where the
researcher recorded a concrete fact or documented occurrence. This kind of field
can be used for statistical analysis.
Trial – The term ‘trial’ refers to the trial event with a prosecutor, judge and assize
present. The project only entered data in fields pertaining to the trial when we had
direct evidence that a trial had taken place. In many instances it would be possible
to infer that a trial had or would have taken place from circumstantial evidence,
4
but we did not define trials on this basis. Future researchers can download the
database and define more trials as they see fit.
Trial Process – This refers to the whole process that led a suspected witch to the
trial event. This includes a series of pre-trial local and central actions starting with
a denunciation and ending with the carrying out of a trial sentence (if the case
went to trial). The trial process is essentially the procedural path of the witchcraft
case. Some cases had more than one procedural path (i.e. two trials). The cultural
or belief aspects of each case remain constant no matter how many trial processes
are defined for each case; there cannot be more than one cultural or belief
delineation per case.
Yes/No Data Type – In fields defined as a ‘Yes/No’ data type (i.e. they have a
tick-box) ‘yes’ (or a tick) means that positive evidence was found for that data
value. If no evidence was found, ‘no’ is entered, but this should be read as
‘unknown’.
Tracking Fields - The database contains many fields designed for system tracking
and to allow the project team and future researchers to track the data entry and
updates. Database users would not normally need to use these fields. See
‘Database Field Types’ for a list.
The database consists of three levels. Each level contains a series of linked tables,
some of which are reference tables that supply set lists of possible data for specific
fields. The first level is the accused. The ‘Accused’ is a self-contained set of fields
and reference tables that can be searched on its own. The second level is the ‘Case’,
comprising all the detail of the accusation. The third level comprises two sets of
information that are embedded within the ‘Case’ – the ‘Trial Process’ and
‘References’. Both of these sets of information are in a one-to-many relationship with
the ‘Case’. See the diagram below for a graphical representation of these
relationships.
5
Case
In theory any given accused witch could have more than one case. However, rather
than creating two cases for people accused and tried for witchcraft more than once,
we have chosen to create two trial processes (see below for description of the trial).
Although we built the capability to define two cases into the database, we did not find
any instances where the evidence showed, beyond all doubt, that one case had
6
completely ended before a second one had begun. Because this is a subjective
assessment, the database has within it the option for a later researcher to redefine
instances where they believe two cases occurred. This could arguably be the case
when a person was re-tried after having received a not guilty verdict or having their
case dismissed. However, since we found none where this information was recorded
unequivocally we felt it was more accurate to use one ‘case’ at this stage.
The database encompasses the three different types of trial for witchcraft: central trial,
local trial, and mixed central and local trial. A central trial took place in the high
court of justiciary in Edinburgh. It was prosecuted by the lord advocate, a
professional jurist, and was presided over by a trained judge. However, the assize
members were brought in from the locality. A local trial was held either in or near the
place of residence of the accused. The prosecutor and judge, drawn from the local
elite, were granted justiciary powers from a central body (Privy Council, Parliament,
Committee of Estates, or Royal Commission). The officials in a local trial were not
usually professional jurists. A mixed local and central trial could be of two types: a
circuit court trial or a local trial with an appointed central official. A circuit court
case brought the apparatus of the high court of justiciary to the locality with a local
assize. A local trial with central representation used local trial apparatus (with a
centrally granted commission) with the addition of a central monitoring authority.
This level of the database also accommodates one other type of trial evidence that is
not easily encompassed by the notion of a ‘trial’, but is nonetheless a vital source of
information about witchcraft accusations. When the accused witch was mentioned (or
described) as a witch in the witchcraft trial of someone else, we have created a
‘Mentioned in a trial’ record. (See concepts above for full a discussion of what this
means.) In some instances trial documents exist for a person who was also mentioned
as a witch in someone else’s witchcraft trial, but in most instances there is no other
evidence about someone who was mentioned as a witch in the course of someone
else’s investigation or trial. These individuals provide important information about
7
numbers of accused, although there are often no other procedural or cultural details
known about them.
The tables included in the trial level include: ‘WDB_Appeal’ (request for a
commission from a central authority), ‘WDB_Commission’, ‘WDB_Complaint’,
‘WDB_Confession’, ‘WDB_Denunciation’, ‘WDB_Imprisonment’,
‘WDB_LinkedTrial’, ‘WDB_MentionedAsWitch’, ‘WDB_MovestoHLA’ (moved to a
higher local authority), ‘WDB_OtherNamedWitch’, ‘WDB_Torture’, ‘WDB_Trial’,
‘WDB_Trial_Person’, ‘WDB_Ordeal’. (Also ‘WDB_PrevCommission’ – a dead table
with dead fields)
‘WDB_Accused’
Patronymic
Ethnic_Origin
‘WDB_Accused_Family’
Patronymic
‘WDB_Case’
ClaimedBewitched
ClaimedPossessed
AdmitLesserCharge
ClaimedNaturalCauses
Nodefence
DefenseNotes
‘WDB_Complaint’
WitchPricker
‘WDB_PrevCommission’
PrevCommRef
PrevCommSystemId
PrevCommID
Trialref
PrevCommdate
PrevCommdate_as_date
Fromwhere
Createdby
8
Createdate
Lastupdatedby
Lastupdatedon
‘WDB_Ref_CaseType’
Casetype
Createdby
Createdate
Lastupdatedby
Lastupdatedon
‘WDB_Ref_Fate’
Fate
Createdby
Createdate
Lastupdatedby
Lastupdatedon
‘WDB_Ref_MeetingName’
Meetingname
Createdby
Createdate
Lastupdatedby
Lastupdatedon
‘WDB_Ref_Outcome’
Outcome
Createdby
Createdate
Lastupdatedby
Lastupdatedon
‘WDB_Accused’
Age
Age_estcareer
Age_estchild
SocioecStatus
‘WDB_Accused_Family’
Age
Age_estcareer
Age_estchild
9
‘WDB_Case’
UnorthodoxRelPract_p
Consulting_p
Demonic_p
Demonic_possess_p
Fairies_p
Folk_healing_p
Maleficium_p
Midwifery_p
ImplicatedByAnother_p
Neighbhd_dispute_p
PoliticalMotive_p
PropertyMotive_p
RefusedCharity_p
Treason_p
Other_p
WhiteMagic_p
‘WDB_Reference’
All the fields in this table were only sometimes applicable to the document.
Therefore, their use was constrained and the result is a subjective account of the type
of document used.
We entered in the settlement when specified. But because this data was not necessary
for our mapping of witchcraft suspects, no attempt has been made to standardise
spelling or to collate possible duplicate settlements. It simply was not cost-effective
to standardise this information.
10
With additional funding from the British Academy we were able to normalise
information about people involved in various aspects of witchcraft cases and trials.
See page 11 below, ‘People Involved in a Case’,for a description of the information
about people involved in witchcraft prosecution contained in the table
‘WDB_person’.
TRACKING FIELDS
(SYSTEM ID, CREATION LOGS AND OTHER NON-ESSENTIAL FIELDS)
The Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database contains a number of fields that were
designed to accommodate complicated data entry protocols, merging of each
researcher’s version of the database, and tracking in case of mistakes. These fields
will be of no academic or intellectual value for future researchers who use this
database. However, we cannot remove them because it would damage the table
structures. The following is a brief key to the abbreviations used in the system fields:
‘JO’ refers to the researcher ‘Joyce Miller’; ‘LA’ refers to the researcher ‘Lauren
Martin’; ‘EGD’ refers to the Edinburgh University Computer Services; and ‘SMD’
refers to Stuart Macdonald. All mentions of ‘SMD’ refer to cases that we tipped into
our database from Stuart Macdonald’s computerised version of The Source-Book of
Scottish Witchcraft, Larner et al. (See ‘Methodology’ for a full description of this
process.) All the numbers in these fields are system numbers. Reference numbers for
all the records in each table were created with a combination of the system number
and the initials of the record creator. The creation logs track who first created the
record and when it was created; and the last updates on each record.
With a small research grant from the British Academy we were able to correct and
standardise this information. We eliminated any obvious duplicate names, indicated
any possible duplicates or connections, entered further personal data where possible
and data cleaned all the fields. We deemed a record a duplicate when there was
obvious evidence that the two records referred to the same person. There were,
however, other possible duplicate records that did not have enough specific
information to identify whether or not they definitely referred to the same person.
When more than one person with the same name was involved in cases that were
more than twenty years apart we did not merge their records unless there was any
other compelling evidence that the records referred to the same person. In instances
where we were unable to establish this unequivocally we indicated these possible
duplicates in the notes field. In the notes field we also included the date range of cases
with which the person was involved (where known) and other other appropriate
information. Where a name appears more than once in the ‘WDB_person’ table we
used a standard modernised version derived from the list used for witchcraft suspects.
This will make it easier for researchers to identify family connections and further
duplicates.
The ‘WDB_person’ table provides a list of people involved in witchcraft cases. It does
not provide detailed information about those people on the list, as people involved
12
were not the primary concern of the project. A person involved in witchcraft
prosecution is connected to the relevant accused witch via one or more of four tables:
‘WDB_case-person’, ‘WDB_appeal’, ‘WDB_complaint’ and ‘WDB_trial_person’. It
is intended that future researchers will use the information in the table ‘WDB_person’
as the starting point for more detailed examination of people involved in witchcraft
prosecution.
D. ENTITY MODELS
13
14
15
WDB_Accused
Column Data Type Description
AccusedRef Character(20) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
AccusedSystemId Character(3) Initials ofrecord creator
AccusedID Long Integer System number
FirstName Character(50) First name as given in the source
LastName Character(50) Surname as given in the source
M_Firstname Character(50) Standard modern first name
M_Surname Character(50) Standard modern surname
Alias Character(50) Name with patronymic or soubriquet
Patronymic Character(50) Patronymic
DesTitle Character(50) Designation or Title
Sex Character(6) Sex of the accused
Age Integer Age at time of case
Age_estcareer Yes/No Indicates that age has been estimated from career
Age_estchild Yes/No Indicates that age has been estimated from the
existence of children
Res_settlement Character(50) Place of residence - settlement
Res_parish Character(50) Place of residence - parish
Res_presbytery Character(50) Place of residence - presbytery
Res_county Character(50) Place of residence - county
Res_burgh Character(50) Place of residence - burgh
Res_NGR_Letters Character(2) Grid reference of place of residence - letters
Res_NGR_Easting Integer Grid reference of place of residence - easting
Res_NGR_Northing Integer Grid reference of place of residence - northing
Ethnic_origin Character(50) Ethnic origin
MaritalStatus Character(50) Marital status
SocioecStatus Character(50) Socio-economic status
Occupation Character(50) Occupation
Notes memo Notes on the accused
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Accused_family
Column Data Type Description
Accused_familyRef Character(20) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
Accused_familySystemId Character(3) Initials of record creator
Accused_familyID Long Integer System number
Surname Character(50) Surname of family member
Firstname Character(50) First name of family member
Alias Character(50) Alias of family member
Patronymic Character(50) Patronymic
DesTitle Character(50) Designation or Title of family member
Est_Year_of_Birth Integer Estimated year of birth
Age Long Integer Age at time of case
Age_estcareer Yes/No Indicates that age has been estimated from career
Age_estchild Yes/No Indicates that age has been estimated from the
existence of children
Occupation Character(50) Occupation of family member
Relationship Character(50) Relationship to accused
AccusedRef Character(20) Identifier for accused
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
16
WDB_Appeal
Column Data Type Description
AppealRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
AppealSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
AppealID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
PersonRef Character(20) Unique identifier for person involved (named
commissioner)
Centralauth Character(50) Name of type of central authority appealed to
Reason Character(50) Reason for appeal
Appealexists Yes/No Check box if no other information
Appealdate Character(50) Date of appeal
Appealdate_as_date Date Date of appeal as date
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_CalendarCustom
Column Data Type Description
CustomRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
CustomSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
CustomID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
Custom_Type Character(50) Calendar custom or observance named in the
document
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Case
Column Data Type Description
CaseRef Character(20) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
CaseId Long Integer Initials of creator
CaseSystemId Character(3) System number
NamedIndividual Integer Case is about a named individual
AccusedRef Character(20) Identifier for accused
CaseStart_date Character(50) Date of case (Start)
CaseStart_date_as_date Date Date of case (Start) as text
Case_date Character(50) Date of case (End) This is the definitive date for
the case
Case_date_as_date Date Date of case (End) as text
Age_at_case Integer Age of accused at time of case
CaseCommonName Character(50) Common name for the case
Commission Character(100) Commission (for cases without named individuals)
Complaint Character(100) Complaint to central authorities (for cases without
named individuals)
Correspondence Character(250) Correspondence (for cases without named
individuals)
Chronicle Character(255) Chronicle or narrative account (for cases without
named individuals)
Other Character(255) Other (for cases without named individuals)
Suspects_text Byte Text describing number of suspects (for cases
without named individuals)
17
documentation
RefusedCharity_p Yes/No Refused Charity as primary characterisation of
case - the team decided this was the main theme
RefusedCharity_s Yes/No Refused Charity as secondary characterisation of
case - the team found this mentioned in the
documentation
Treason_p Yes/No Treason as primary characterisation of case - the
team decided this was the main theme
Treason_s Yes/No Treason as secondary characterisation of case - the
team found this mentioned in the documentation
Other_p Yes/No Other primary characterisation
Other_s Yes/No Other secondary characterisation
OtherText Character(255) Description of other characterisation
NotEnoughInfo_p Yes/No Not enough information recorded
NotEnoughInfo_s Yes/No Characterisation unknown
WhiteMagic_p Yes/No White Magic as primary characterisation - the
team decided this was the main theme
WhiteMagic_s Yes/No White Magic as secondary characterisation - the
team found this mentioned in the documentation
Charnotes memo Notes on characterisation of case
DemonicPact Yes/No Demonic pact was implied in the sources
DevilNotes memo Notes about the Devil from the documenation
WitchesMeeting Yes/No Witches' meetings - accused attended
MeetingName Character(50) Witches' meetings - Meeting Name (field never
used)
DevilPresent Yes/No Witches' meetings - Devil Present at a meeting
Maleficium Yes/No Witches' meetings - Collective maleficium
organised or committed at a meeting
CommunalSex Yes/No Witches' meetings - Communal sex at a meeting
DevilWorship Yes/No Witches' meetings - Worship of the Devil at a
meeting
FoodAndDrink Yes/No Witches' meetings - Food and Drink consumed at a
meeting
Dancing Yes/No Witches' meetings - Dancing at a meeting
Singing Yes/No Witches' meetings - Singing at a meeting
SingingText Character(255) Witches' meetings - Name of song sung at a
meeting
OtherPractices Character(255) Witches' meetings - Other practices at a meeting
MeetingNotes memo Witches' meetings - description of meeting or
anything to do with the meeting
Elphane/Fairyland Yes/No Folk Culture - Elphane/Fairyland mentioned or
described
Food/Drink Yes/No Folk Culture - Food/Drink consumed at Elphane or
fairyland
SpecificVerbalFormulae Yes/No Folk Culture - Specific Verbal Formulae used for
curing or any other ritual were discussed in the
documentation
SpecificRitualActs Yes/No Folk Culture - Specific Ritual Acts were discussed
in the documentation
Familiars Yes/No Folk Culture - The accused had a familiar (a small
animal or spirit that did her bidding)
Shape-Changing Yes/No Folk Culture - The documentation mentioned
shape-changing of the accused
Dreams/Visions Yes/No Folk Culture - Accused appeared in a Dream or
Visions
UnorthodoxReligiousPrac Yes/No Folk Culture - Accused used an Unorthodox
tice Religious Practice
SympatheticMagic Yes/No Folk Culture - Sympathetic magic (use of an object
19
WDB_Case_person
Column Data Type Description
Case_personRef Character(20) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
Case_personID Long Integer Initials of record creator
Case_personSystemId Character(3) System number
CaseRef Character(20) Case ID
20
WDB_Commission
Column Data Type Description
CommissionRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
CommissionSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
CommissionID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Commbody Character(50) Central authority that granted the commission:
Privy Council, Parliament, Committee of Estates,
Royal
Commtype Character(50) Type of commission that was granted
Commexists Yes/No Checkbox if no other information known
Commdate Character(50) Date of commission
Commdate_as_date Date Date of commission as date
Seal Character(50) Seal under which the commission was granted
Notes memo Any notes on the commission
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Complaint
Column Data Type Description
ComplaintRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
ComplaintSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
ComplaintID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Complaint Yes/No Is a complaint recorded?
Complaint_type Character(50) Who lodged the complaint
Complaintdate Character(50) Date of complaint
Complaintdate_as_date Date Date of complaint as date
Wherelodged Character(50) Where complaintwas lodged
Accused_familyRef Character(50) Identifier for family member that made the
complaint
PersonRef Character(20) Person ID
Involvement Character(50) Role in Trial
WitchPricker Yes/No Is a witch pricker
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Confession
Column Data Type Description
ConfessionRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
ConfessionSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
ConfessionID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
CentralTrialConfession Yes/No Confession at central level
Confessionrec Yes/No Checkbox to indicate that a confession occured
( in case no other information known)
21
WDB_CounterStrategy
Column Data Type Description
CounterStrategyRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
CounterStrategySystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
CounterStrategyID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
CounterStrategy_Type Character(50) Type of strategy used to counter the magic of the
accused or strategy used by accused to counter
magic used against the accused
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_DemonicPact
Column Data Type Description
DemonicRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
DemonicSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
DemonicID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
Demonic_Type Character(50) Demonic pact motif type
Demonic_Text Character(50) Text field for further description of demonic pact
motif type
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Denunciation
Column Data Type Description
DenuncRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
DenuncSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
DenuncID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Denunc_exists Yes/No Checkbox to indicate that a denunciation occured
( in case no other information known
Denuncdate Character(50) Date of denunciation
Denuncdate_as_date Date Date of denunciation as date
Denunc_text Character(50) reason for denuciation
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_DevilAppearance
22
WDB_Elf_FairyElements
Column Data Type Description
ElfFairyRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
ElfFairySystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
ElfFairyID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
ElfFairy_Type Character(50) Type of elf or fairy motif
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Imprisonment
Column Data Type Description
ImprisonRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
ImprisonSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
ImprisonID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
CentralTrialImprison Yes/No imprisonment at central level
Imprisondate Character(50) Date of imprisonment
Imprisondate_as_date Date Date of imprisonment as date
Prison Character(50) Place of imprisonment (e.g. building)
Location Character(50) Location of imprisonment (e.g. town)
Moving Yes/No Moving suspect for confrontation with another
suspect or a witness
Fate_in_prison Character(50) Fate in prison
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_LinkedTrial
Column Data Type Description
OneTrialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
TwoTrialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Malice
Column Data Type Description
MaliceRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
MaliceSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
MaliceID Long Integer System number
23
WDB_MentionedAsWitch
Column Data Type Description
MentionRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
MentionSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
MentionID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Mentiondate Character(50) Date of mention
Mentiondate_as_date Date Date of mention as date
Mentiontype Character(50) Type of mention - how the suspect was mentioned
TrialOfAccusedRef Character(20) Reference of trial
TrialOfFirstName Character(50) First name
TrialOfLastName Character(50) Surname
MentionedInTrialOfRef Character(50) Reference of trial in which the suspect (i.e. the
mentioned witch) was mentioned
dateOfMentionedTrial Character(50) Date of trial in which the suspect was mentioned
dateOfMentionedTrial_as Date Date of trial as date
_date
FateOfMentionedWitch Character(50) Fate of the mentioned suspect
Notes memo Notes
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_MovestoHLA
Column Data Type Description
MoveRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
MoveSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
MoveID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Moveto Character(50) Name of higher local authority to which the trial
process moved
Moveexists Yes/No Checkbox if no other information known
Movedate Character(50) Date of move to highler local authority
Movedate_as_date Date Date of move as move
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_MusicalInstrument
Column Data Type Description
MusicalInstrumentRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
MusicalInstrumentSystem Character(50) Initials of creator
Id
MusicalInstrumentID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
MusicalInstrument_Type Character(50) Type of musical instrument used at a witches'
meeting
MusicalInstrument_Text Character(50) Text field to describe the music played or the
instrucment
24
WDB_Ordeal
Column Data Type Description
OrdealRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
OrdealSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
OrdealID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Ordealexists Yes/No Checkbox to indicate that an ordeal occured ( in
case no other information known
Ordealdate Character(50) Date of ordeal
Ordealdate_as_date Date Date of ordeal as date
Ordealtype Character(50) Type of ordeal used
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_OtherCharges
Column Data Type Description
OtherChargesRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
OtherChargesSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
OtherChargesID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
OtherCharges_Type Character(50) Additional crimes the suspect was charged with
(other than witchcraft)
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_OtherNamedwitch
Column Data Type Description
NamedWitchRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
NamedWitchSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
NamedWitchID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Mentiontype Character(50) Type of mention - how the named witch was
mentioned
NamedWitchAccusedRef Character(20) Identifier for accused witch
NamedWitchFirstName Character(50) First name
NamedWitchLastName Character(50) Surname
NamedWitchTrialOfRef Character(50) Reference of the named witches' trial
dateOfNamedWitchTrial Character(50) Date of the named witches' trial
dateOfNamedWitchTrial_ Date Date of trial as date
as_date
Notes memo Notes
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Person
Column Data Type Description
PersonRef Character(20) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
25
WDB_PrevCommission
Column Data Type Description
PrevCommRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
PrevCommSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
PrevCommID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
PrevCommexists Yes/No Checkbox if no other information known (field not
used)
PrevCommdate Character(50) Date of commission (field not used)
PrevCommdate_as_date Date Date of commission as date (field not used)
Fromwhere Character(50) From where commission previously granted (field
not used)
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_PropertyDamage
Column Data Type Description
PropertyDamageRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
PropertyDamageSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
PropertyDamageID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
PropertyDamage_Type Character(50) Type of property damage allegedly committed by
the suspect
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Reference
Column Data Type Description
ReferenceRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
RefSystemID Character(50) Initials of creator
ReferenceID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(50) Identifier for case
SourceRef Character(50) Link to source
Reference Character(255) Reference
KirkSession Yes/No Kirk session minutes
Presbytery Yes/No Presbytery minutes
BurghCourt Yes/No Burgh court minutes
Confession Yes/No Confession
26
WDB_ReligiousMotif
Column Data Type Description
MotifRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
MotifSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
MotifID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
Motif_Type Character(50) Type of religious motif desribed in the documents
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_RitualObject
Column Data Type Description
RitualObjectRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
RitualObjectSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
RitualObjectID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
RitualObject_Type Character(50) Type of ritual object described in the document
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_ShapeChanging
Column Data Type Description
ShapeChangingRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
ShapeChangingSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
ShapeChangingID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
ShapeChanging_Type Character(50) Type of shape changing described in the document
27
WDB_Source
Column Data Type Description
SourceRef Character(50) Name of source
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Torture
Column Data Type Description
TortureRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
TortureSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
TortureID Long Integer System number
Trialref Character(20) Local identifier for trial
Tortureexists Yes/No Checkbox to indicate that a torture occured ( in
case no other information known
Torturedate Character(50) Date of torture
Torturedate_as_date Date Date of torture as date
Torturetype Character(50) Type of torture described in the document
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_Trial
Column Data Type Description
Trialref Character(20) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
TrialId Long Integer System number
TrialSystemId Character(3) Initials of creator
CaseRef Character(20) Identifier for case
TrialType Byte Type of trial
Trial_settlement Character(50) Location of trial - settlement
Trial_parish Character(50) Location of trial - parish
Trial_presbytery Character(50) Location of trial - presbytery
Trial_county Character(50) Location of trial - county
Trial_burgh Character(50) Location of trial - burgh
Trial_NGR_Letters Character(2) Grid reference of trial location - letters
Trial_NGR_Easting Integer Grid reference of trial location - easting
Trial_NGR_Northing Integer Grid reference of trial location - northing
Watching Yes/No Watching and warding
WatchingDate Character(50) Date of watching and warding
WatchingDate_as_date Character(50) Date of watching and warding as date
Arrest Yes/No Arrest
ArrestDate Character(50) Date of arrest
ArrestDate_as_date Date Date of arrest as date
Fled Yes/No Fled from justice
FledDate Character(50) Date Fled
FledDate_as_date Date Date Fled as date
ActionDropped Yes/No A specific decision was made to drop the action
taken against the suspect
Actiondropdate Character(50) Date Action was dropped
28
WDB_Trial_Person
Column Data Type Description
Trial_personRef Character(20) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
Trial_personID Long Integer System number
Trial_personSystemId Character(3) Initials of creator
TrialRef Character(20) Trial ID
PersonRef Character(20) Person ID
CaseRef Character(20) Case ID
Involvement Character(50) Role in case
WitchPricker Yes/No Is a witch pricker
29
WDB_WeatherModification
Column Data Type Description
WeatherModificationRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
WeatherModificationSyst Character(50) Initials of creator
emId
WeatherModificationID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
WeatherModification_Typ Character(50) Type of weather modification described in the
e documents
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_WhiteMagic
Column Data Type Description
WhiteMagicRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
WhiteMagicSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
WhiteMagicID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
WhiteMagic_Type Character(50) Type of white magic described in the documents
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
WDB_WitchesMeetingPlace
Column Data Type Description
MeetingPlaceRef Character(50) Unique identifier - initials plus system number
MeetingPlaceSystemId Character(50) Initials of creator
MeetingPlaceID Long Integer System number
CaseRef Character(20) Local identifier for case
MeetingPlace_Place Character(50) Place of witches' meeting
Inversion Yes/No Inversion used at a witches' meeting
Location Character(50) Location of the witches' meeting
Createdby Character(50) Name of person who created this record
Createdate Date Date record created
Lastupdatedby Character(50) Name of person who last updated the record
Lastupdatedon Date Date record last updated
30
Custom_Type – This field records calendar customs that were found in the witchcraft
documents. A calendar custom is a special day. In most instances the calendar
customs were mentioned as a way to express the time or date of an incident
rather than as a celebration of the festival or special day itself. It was usually a
way to mark the passage of time.
All Saints’ Day: 1 November, follows All Hallows’ Eve
Andrewmas: 30 November, mass celebrated on St Andrew’s day
Barthills Day: 25 August, celebration of St Bartholomew
Beltane: 1 May, celebration associated with the Celtic feast of Bel
Borrowing days: last three days of March, from the fable that March borrowed three
days from April.
Candlemas: 2 February, feast of the celebration of the presentation of Christ to the
Temple
Easter: movable Christian celebration of the execution and resurrection of Christ
Fastings eve: Scottish term for Shrove Tuesday (the evening before the fast), the day
before the fast of Lent
Halloween: 31 October, All Hallows’ Eve, day before All Saints’ Day, also associated
with Celtic festivity of Samhain
Handsel Monday: first Monday of the New Year when gifts were exchanged
31
Harvest: secular celebration of the end of harvest in August, was incorporated into the
Christian calendar
Holy Cross day: 13 or 14 September, celebration of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross
Lammas: 1 August, Celtic festivity of Lugh, also known as Lughnasadh
Lent: 40 day fast before Easter, starts on Ash Wednesday
Martinmas: 11 November, mass celebrated on St Martin’s day
Michaelmas: 29 September, mass celebrated on St Michael’s day
Midsummer: 24 June, summer solstice, before the start of the shortening of day, also
St John’s day
Nuris Day: possibly associated with wet nursing, we are not sure
Our Lady Day (Harvest): 16 August, festival associated with the mother of Christ
Quarter day: day dividing the Celtic year into four, marking the different seasons
Ruidday: 3 May or 14 September, celebration of the Invention of the Holy Cross or
Rude
Sabbath: Sunday, day of religious worship
Saint Magnus Day: 16 April, celebration of St Magnus
Saint Thomas Eve: 20 December, celebration of St Thomas
Whitsunday: Pentecost, 50 days after Easter Sunday
Yule: midwinter festival, equivalent to Christmas
Demonic_Type – refers to the type or motif of demonic pact that was described in the
witchcraft documents.
Anti-baptism: renunciation of Christian baptism, apostasy
Body and soul: giving oneself over to the Devil, body and soul
Bond/Band: an agreement with the Devil
Devil's Mark: mark received from the Devil as a sign of pact (often described as not
sensible to feeling)
Head and foot: touching of the head and foot with opposite hands – all between was
given to the Devil
Kisses Devil's bottom: worship of the Devil by inversion/perversion of Christian
symbolism
New name: new name given to a witch by the Devil indicating a rejection of Christian
baptism – a re-naming by the Devil
Paction: general, non-specific pact made with the Devil
Possession: the accused witch claimed to be possessed by the Devil
Servant: indicates that the accused had agreed to be the Devil’s servant
32
Sex: indicated that the accused had sexual relations with the Devil
Tacit pact: the accused used power of the pact but did not describe any specific
features
Want nothing: the accused confessed that the Devil promised to provide everything
for them and that they ‘should never want’
Devil_Type – This field refers to the type of non-natural being that was mentioned or
described in the documents.
Animal Devil: the Devil appeared in animal form
Baby: the Devil appeared in the form of a baby
Child Devil: the Devil appeared in the form of a child
Fairy: non-natural being appeared in the form of a fairy, gender not specified
Female: the Devil appeared in the form of a female
Female Fairy: non-natural being appeared in the form of a female fairy
Ghost: non-natural being appeared in the form of a ghost or dead person
Inanimate Object Devil: the Devil appeared in the form of an inanimate object
Insect Devil: the Devil appeared in the form of an insect
Male: the Devil appeared in the form of a man
Male Fairy: non-natural being appeared in the form of a man
Other Demon: non-natural being appeared in the form of another non-specified
demon
Spirit: non-natural being appeared in the form of a non-specified spirit
Unspecified Devil: non-natural being appeared in the form of a non-specified Devil
ElfFairy_Type – This field records information about fairy motifs that were
mentioned or described in the documents. We have researched fairy motifs to
design this list of cultural indications of fairies. We take the terms fairy and
elf to be interchangeable.
12:00: indicates the mentioning of liminal boundary times such as the change from
day into night or night into day. This data value means that the documents
didn’t specify whether they were referring to noon or midnight
Bells: either a protective symbol used against fairies or something used by fairies
themselves
Bored-Stone: a stone with a natural hole in it, used as protection against the power of
fairies
Changeling: a baby or young child thought to have been replaced by a fairy, usually
associated with sickly children
Changeling Egg: used to tempt the fairy changeling to reveal itself and return the
human child
33
Holy well: well or spring believed to have special powers, sometime associated with a
saint of other revered figure or fairies. Wells were believed to have special
powers of healing. The Protestant church condemned pilgrimages to wells or
use of holy wells for healing or restoration.
Nine: repetition of action 3x3, powerful number and motif used in many cultures
Pilgrimage: journey to sacred place, banned by the Scottish parliament in 1581
Prayer: invocation, which may have been thought to have been used in a superstitious
or ignorant way
Saints: pre-Reformation invocation of saints for intercession, condemned by
Protestant church
Scripture: extracts from the Christian bible, verses or prayers
Sign of the cross: crossing oneself, emblem of crucifixion, associated with
Catholicism, condemned by Protestant church
Six: repetition of action 2x3 times
Three: significant number and motif, both Christian and pre-Christian symbolism
Trinity: Christian Holy Trinity – Father, Son and Holy Ghost
OrdealType – An ordeal was a test conducted in order to let nature or God reveal the
truth. It was technically distinct from torture, although many ordeals involved
painful procedures.
Bierricht (corpse bleeds): corpse bleeds when touched by person who was guilty of
the murder
Ducking: otherwise known as the water test. The accused person was put in water to
see if they floated. If they sank they were seen to be innocent and efforts were
made to rescue the suspect. If they floated they were seen to be guilty. This
test was rarely used in Scotland.
Pricking: the body of the suspect witch was pricked with pins in order to find a
Devil’s mark. Learned belief said that the Devil’s mark was left on the body
of the witch after she or he had sealed a pact with the Devil. It was believed to
be insensitive to pain. Often moles, warts or other visible skin blemishes were
tested and shown to be Devil’s marks.
Searching: general, non-specified searching for Devil’s marks
Victim Fit: used in possession cases to identify the person causing the possession,
victim had fit in presence of suspected persecutor
RitualObject_Type – This field records objects that were described in the documents
as being used in a ritualised way or for a ritualistic purpose.
Ale: alcohol, no specific symbolic use. Often described as being used for
reconciliation of quarrels.
Almond: non-native, exotic plant, association between almond tree and the Virgin
Amulet: protective charm (stone, pebble) worn or placed in a house
35
Animal dung: animal excreta was believed to have healing properties – possibly
transferring life force, like blood
Aqua Vitae: Water of Life, a distilled spirit (probably whisky)
Ash: the ash tree or its ashes could be used, ashes used in religious & healing rituals,
sap of the tree had protective properties,
Axe: made of iron, used to protect against fairies
Bannock: cakes often used in divination rituals or for good luck/protection
Baton: no specific symbolic use, but possibly a symbolic weapon, phallus, or staff of
office.
Bead: decorative item used as an amulet or votive offering
Beetle: in Ireland known as darbhdaol or devil’s coach horse
Belt: and girdle, often associated with fertility or predicting outcome of illness
Bird (dead): no specific symbolic use, used to transfer dangerous magical substances
or to cause harm.
Blood (animal): special qualities of the animal passed to human, as with dung
Bone: last part of body to decay and contained last of the physical soul, also used in
divination
Book: bible or other religious missal or herbal, the written word was seen to have
magical properties for non-literate society, used in divination
Bowl: no specific symbolic use, used in transference rituals
Branch: part of non-specified tree, some trees were seen to have protective or magical
powers
Bread: could be an offering to supernatural powers, had healing and/or protective
properties
Bridle/collar: like belt, used in some sympathetic magical rituals (sympathetic magic
is when an object is used to stand in for a specific person or thing)
Butter: no specific symbolic use, used in transference rituals
Caird: instrument used to card wool, used in sympathetic magical ritual
Camomile: medicinal herb, has calming effect on digestion, aids sleep and protects
against nightmares
Cat: sacred animal, often associated with bringing bad luck
Cheese: no specific symbolic use, used in transference rituals
Clay: figures made of clay used in image magic to represent the intended victim
Cloth: used to represent the sick person, blessed and returned to them to provide cure,
or sometimes a cloth was wrapped around items to make a sachet for charms
(good or bad)
Clothing: used to represent the sick person, blessed and returned to them to provide a
cure
Coal: good luck amulet
36
Cockerel: sacred bird, announcer of the dawn, used in sacrificial rituals and divination
Coin: could be left as a votive offering or used as an amulet
Corn: no specific symbolic use, but as living grain associated with fertility and growth
Corpse: used to provide/transfer magical properties of the dead
Corpse powder: used to provide/transfer magical properties of the dead
Crook: made of iron, used for protection from harmful power of fairies
Curch: kerchief or woman’s hat, sometimes removed during a curse/harmful ritual
Dog: no specific symbolic use
Drink: no specific symbolic use but used to administer/transfer magical
properties/powers
Earth: refers to soil, believed to represent the power of nature, fertility and growth
Egg: supernatural symbol, earth/life/soul, associated with fertility, Easter and fairies
Elfshot: prehistoric arrowhead used by fairies/witches to cause harm, could be used as
protective amulet
Feathers: no specific symbolic use, used in transference rituals
Fire: basic element, seen to have purifying powers. Also possibly associated with
hellfire. Many symbolic and ritual events used fire.
Flask of Water: used to transport blessed or sacred water
Flesh: specifically animal meat, not human flesh, no specific symbolic use but used in
sympathetic magic both to harm and for healing (sympathetic magic is when
an object is used to stand in for a specific person or thing)
Foxtree Leaves: Foxglove, medicinal plant that affects the heart, also used an amulet
against demonic powers
Frog: as for toad, associated with Devil, sin and impurity, used in transference of
disease
Garland: non-specific garland of plants/flowers, no specific symbolic use
Garlic: stinkweed, medicinal plant, antiseptic qualities, believed to drive away evil
Glass: no specific symbolic use
Glove: no specific symbolic use, used in transference rituals
Grain: same meaning as corn, no specific symbolic use, but as living grain associated
with fertility and growth
Grass: no specific symbolic use, but associated with fertility and growth
Grave earth: used to provide/transfer magical properties of the dead
Hair: no specific symbolic use, used in transference rituals, or sometimes in
sympathetic magic to stand in for the victim
Hairbelt: no specific symbolic use, used in transference rituals
Hand (dead): used to provide/transfer magical properties of the dead
Hen: associated with weather, fertility symbol, blood used in healing rituals
37
Thread: often used to tie around sick person as part of healing ritual
Toad: as for frog, associated with Devil, sin and impurity, used in transference of
disease
Tobacco: non-native, exotic plant, no specific symbolic use, regarded as medicinal
Tree: non-specified, some are associated with healing/protective powers
Turf: representing the power of nature, fertility and growth
Urine: no specific symbolic use, but often used in healing rituals or medicines
Urine (stale): no specific symbolic use, but often used in healing rituals or medicines
Vinegar: no specific symbolic use
Water: life giving, associated with healing power of nature, spirits and saints
Watercress: medicinal plant, antiscorbutic qualities, said to increase appetite
Wax: figures/pictures made of wax used in image magic to represent the intended
victim, this is sympathetic magic, the three dimensional figure was used to
stand in for the body of the intended victim.
Wax/clay images: used in image magic to represent the intended victim
Wayburn leaf: or waybread, common plantain, sacred medicinal herb, diuretic and
astringent properties
Wheat: no specific symbolic use, but as living grain associated with fertility and
growth
Wine: no specific symbolic use, but unusual ingredient, possible religious symbolism
Wood: non-specified type of wood, may have some special properties
Wort: infusion of malt, fermented to make ale, no specific symbolic use
Yarn: woollen thread, often used to tie around sick person as part of healing ritual
TortureType – this field records the types of torture used in witchcraft investigations.
Torture was the application of measured pain in order to coerce a person to
provide information. None of these tortures seem to have been technically
judicial torture.
Bound with ropes: tied by ropes for a period of time
Bow strings: pain caused by application of strings used in bows
Burning feet: feet burnt with hot coals
Caspicaws: cashielaws, Scottish term for the boots, an instrument of torture that
slowly crushed the shins, it could be tightened or loosened to inflict greater or
41
lesser pain. Recent work on cashielaws suggests that it was not, in fact, the
boots but rather a large metal instrument that folded the body in two.
Haircloth: the accused was covered with a cloth made of animal hair, could be very
painful on the skin
Hanging by thumbs: suspended by thumbs for a period of time
Irons: tied in iron chains
Rack: tied to wooden rack and stretched
Sleep Deprivation: watched and warded, kept awake continuously
Stocks: put in wooden frame with holes for legs
Thumbscrews: thumbs squeezed
Tied to pole: tied to pole for a period of time
Various: various non-specified type or types of torture
Wedges on the shins: pain caused by application of weights/wedges to the shins,
possibly the same as the ‘boots’
Whip: whipped with a whip or rope
Verdict – the final ruling on whether or not the accused witch was guilty of the crime
of witchcraft (as opposed to the individual indictments made against her or
him).
Guilty: found guilty of the crime of witchcraft, whether or not the suspect was found
innocent of some of the specific indictments.
Half Guilty: A catch-all term to include all those cases where the suspect was not
found guilty, but there was enough evidence to presume some culpability for
the crime. Not enough evidence to support a fully guilty verdict, but enough
evidence to show a strong suspicion of guilt. This sometimes resulted in being
found guilty of a lesser charge or being punished for suspicion of witchcraft.
Not Guilty: clengit or cleinged, not guilty of the crime of witchcraft
Not Proven: not enough evidence to proceed, but not completely exonerated
Archives. In the rest of Scotland individual JPs were active in the early phases of a
witchcraft investigation. It was hoped that some would have kept notes about these
activities in their minute books, but few such books survive and no relevant notes
were found in them. It remains to examine their private papers for documents
pertaining to witchcraft. This was outside the scope of our project.
Witches: with some account of the Orkney witchcraft trials’. This is the typescript of
a short book incorporating the information from D31/4/3 and from John G. Dalyell,
The Darker Superstitions of Scotland (1834). The whole collection was surveyed.
CH2 - Kirk session records (NAS and regional archives, see Bibliography)
These are manuscript records of the minutes of meetings held at parish or kirk level in
the post-Reformation church in Scotland. Meetings were often held weekly. In
many parishes the meetings were held less often, the minute books have not
survived or the kirk session was not fully established. Kirk session minutes
that have survived did not follow a standardised procedure of documentation,
and so the kind of information recorded can vary greatly.
Ministers and elders attended the meetings. Elders were male lay members of
the congregation and consisted for the most part of landowners, mercantile elite,
craftsmen and farmers. A clerk would be appointed to record the minutes.
Kirk sessions could investigate, and make judicial decisions, on cases of
sexual offence, quarrelling and slandering, sabbath breaking and other miscellaneous
offences into which latter category fell suspected cases of witchcraft and magic. If the
investigation revealed demonic witchcraft practice the accused would be referred to
the secular authorities, although they often contacted the presbytery for further advice.
The church courts had no criminal jurisdiction and could not pass a sentence of capital
punishment; this was left to the secular courts of law. Punishments meted out by
church courts consisted of public repentance in sackcloth or stool and/or monetary
fines.
Most of the kirk session records are held at the National Archives of Scotland but
others are held at local archives including St Andrews University Library Special
Collections, Stirling, Ayr, Dundee, Aberdeen, Orkney and Mitchell Library in
Glasgow.
Private papers
Pollok Papers, T-PM 107/14/7-8. Private papers belonging to the Maxwell of
Pollok family held at the Mitchell Library in Glasgow.
46
Printed sources
All JP indexes
JP3/2/1-3
JP35/4
PC1/47
PC1/48
PC1/50 (this index was not consulted as it was not available for production)
PC1/51
PC1/52
PC1/53
PA11/8
PA11/9
NAS Indexes
JC26/1-7High Court Record, Index No. 1 – 15 July 1537-25 Nov 1785 (not a
complete listing of cases in JC2 and JC3).
Justiciary Records, Books of Adjournal, O. S., vol. 5, 1611-1619, index
Justiciary Records, Books of Adjournal, O. S., vol. 6, 1619-1631, Index
NAS, Index to Justiciary Records, 1699-1720
ORKNEY ARCHIVES
JP34/2/1 1663-1668, also includes material from 1676-1677
JP34/2/1 minute books, quarter sessions 9 Oct. 1663-12 Aug. 1668
JP34/5/1 1658-1659 (24 items)
JP34/5/1/56 1658-1659
JP24/5/2 1716, 1755, 1783 – 1799 (8 items)
SC10/1/6 1630-1648
SC10/1/7 1655-1659
SC10/1/9 1655-1677
SC11/5 indexes1561-1737
SC11/5/1646/10
Chanonry, CH2/66/1-4
Chirnside, CH2/516/1-4
Cupar, CH2/82/1-7 (St Andrews University Library)
Dalkeith, CH2/424/1-12
Deer, CH2/89/1-5
Dingwall, CH2/92/1-6
Dornoch, CH2/1290/1-2
Dumbarton, CH2/546/1-4
Dumfries, CH2/1284/1-7
Dunbar, CH2/99/1-6
Dunblane, CH2/723/1-9 (Stirling Council Archives)
Dundee, CH2/103/1-11 (Stirling Council Archives)
Dunfermline, CH2/105/1-6
Dunkeld, CH2/106/1-6
Dunoon, CH2/111/1-4
Duns, CH2/113/1-6
Earlston, CH2/118/1-4
Edinburgh, CH2/121/ 1-13
Elgin, CH2/144/1-6
Ellon, CH2/146/1-8
Fordoun, CH2/157/1-5
Fordyce, CH2/158/1-6
Forfar, CH2/159/1-3
Forres, CH2/162/1-2
Garioch, CH2/166/1-5
Glasgow, CH2/171/1-11 (Glasgow City Archives)
Haddington, CH2/155/1-12
Hamilton, CH2/393/1-3
Inveraray, CH2/190/1-2
Inverness, CH2/553/1-5
Irvine, CH2/197/1-4
Jedburgh, CH2/198/1-9
Kincardine O’Neil, CH2/602/1-2
Kintyre, CH2/1153/1-3
Kirkcaldy, CH2/224/1-6
Kirkcudbright, CH2/526/1-4
Lanark, CH2/234/1-8
Linlithgow, CH2/242/1-13
Lochmaben, CH2/247/1-3
Lorn, CH2/984/1-3
Meigle, CH2/263/1-9
Middlebie (Annan), CH2/267/1-3
Mull, CH2/273/1
North Isles, CH2/1801/1-2 (Orkney Archives)
Orkney, CH2/1082/1-7 (Orkney Archives)
Paisley, CH2/294/1-9
Peebles, CH2/295/1-10
Penpoint, CH2/298/1-3
Perth, CH2/299/1-14
Scalloway, CH2/1071/1-3
50
Selkirk, CH2/327/1-3
St Andrews, CH2/1132/1-4 (St Andrews University Library)
St Andrews, CH2/1132/1585-1605 (no NAS catalogue number) (St Andrews
University Library)
St Andrews, CH2/1132/1641-1656 (no NAS catalogue number) (St Andrews
University Library)
St Andrews, CH2/1132/1656-1687 (no NAS catalogue number) (St Andrews
University Library)
St Andrews, CH2/1132/1693-1698 (no NAS catalogue number) (St Andrews
University Library)
St Andrews, CH2/1132/1699-1705 (no NAS catalogue number) (St Andrews
University Library)
Stirling, CH2/722/1-12 (Stirling Council Archives)
Stranraer, CH2/341/1-3
Strathbogie, CH2/342/2-5
Tain, CH2/348/1-6
Tongue, CH2/508/1
Turriff, CH2/1120/1-4
Wigtown, CH2/373/1-3
Colmonell, CH2/425//1
Corstorphine, CH2/124/1
Cortachy, CH2/561/1
Covington, CH2/72/1
Cramond, CH2/426/1
Croy, CH2/76/1
Cullen, CH2/1113/1
Culross, CH2/77/2 & 4
Dairsie, CH2/427/1
Dalkeith, CH2/84/1 & 3
Dalmellington, CH2/85/1 (Ayrshire Archives)
Dron, CH2/93/1
Duffus, CH2/96/1/2
Dumfries, St Michael’s, CH2/537/13
Dunbar, CH2/647/1
Dunbarney, CH2/100/2
Dunblane, CH2/101/1 (Stirling Council Archives)
Dundonald, CH2/104/1-3 (Ayrshire Archives)
Dunfermline, CH2/592/1
Dunino, CH2/405/1 (St Andrews University Library)
Dyce, CH2/117/1
Dysart, CH2/390/2
Ecclesmachan, CH2/623/1
Edinburgh, Canongate, CH2/122/2, 3 & 4
Edinburgh, St Cuthbert’s, CH2/718/1, 3 & 6 (Volume 2, too damaged, not available
for consultation)
Edinburgh, Trinity, CH2/141/1 & 3
Edinkillie, CH2/432/1
Elgin, St Giles, CH2/145/1, 2, 5 & 7
Ellon, CH2/147/2
Essil, CH2/839/1
Falkirk, CH2/400/1 & 2
Falkland, CH2/428/1 & 2 (St Andrews University Library)
Fenwick, CH2/982/1
Ferryport-on-Craig, CH2/150/1 (St Andrews University Library)
Fetteresso, CH2/153/1
Fintry, CH2/438/1 (Stirling Council Archives)
Fordyce, CH2/1114/1
Forglen, CH2/869/1
Forgue, CH2/539/1
Forres, CH2/1448/1
Fraserburgh, CH2/1142/2 & 3
Galston, CH2/1335/2 & 5
Gargunnock, CH2/1121/1 (Stirling Council Archives)
Glasgow, St Mungo’s, CH2/550/1 & 2 (Glasgow City Archives)
Govan, CH2/1277/1 (Glasgow City Archives)
Grange, CH2/541/2
Haddington, CH2/799//1 & 3
Hamilton, Old, CH2/465/7
Humbie, CH2/389/1
52
Oldhamstocks, CH2/288/1
Ormiston, CH2/292/1
Peebles Old, CH2/420/1
Pencaitland, CH2/296/1
Penicuik, CH2/297/1
Perth, St John’s, CH2/521/2
Petty, CH2/458/1
Pittenweem, CH2/833/1 (St Andrews University Library)
Polwarth, CH2/721/1
Queensferry, South, Old CH2/689/1
Rothesay, CH2/890/1
Rothiemay, CH2/416/1& 2
Rutherglen, CH2/315/1 (Glasgow City Archives)
St Madoes, CH2/1198/1& 2 (St Andrews University Library)
St Nicholas, Aberdeen, CH2/448/5 & 8
Scoonie, CH2/326/1
Shapinsay, CH2/1100/1
Shotts, CH2/460/1
Slains, CH2/480/1
South Leith, CH2/716/1, 3, 5 & 6
Stirling, Holy Rude, CH2/1026/1, 3 & 4 (Stirling Council Archives)
Stirling, St Ninian’s, CH2/337/1 (Stirling Council Archives)
Stow, CH2/338/1 & 2
Tealing, CH2/352/1 (Dundee City Archives)
Thurso, St Peter’s, CH2/414/1
Tillicoultry, CH2/726/1 (Stirling Council Archives)
Tyninghame, CH2/359/1 & 2
Wemyss, CH2/365/1 & 2
Yester, CH2/377/1 & 2
Calendar of Scottish State Papers Relating to Scotland and Mary Queen of Scots,
1547-1603, volumes 3-9, W. K. Boyd (editor), Edinburgh, 1936.
54
Court Books of Orkney and Shetland, 1614-1615, Robert S. Barclay (editor), SHS,
Edinburgh, 1967.
Justiciary Records of Argyll and the Isles, volume 1, 1664-1705, John Cameron
(editor), Stair Society, Edinburgh, 1949.
Miscellany of the Maitland Club, volume ii, part I, ‘Acts and Statues of the Lawting
Sheriff and Justice Courts within Orkney and Zetland’, 1602-1644, Edinburgh, 1840.
Miscellany of the Spalding Club, volumes i, iv & v, John Stuart (editor), Aberdeen,
1841-52.
Rotuli Scaccarii Regum Scotorum: The Exchequer Rolls of Scotland, volume xx, J.
Stuart et al (editors), Edinburgh, 1899-1908.
Selected Justiciary Cases, S.A. Gillon (editor), volume I, Stair Society, Edinburgh,
1953.
Selected Justiciary Cases, J. Irvine Smith (editor), volume II, Stair Society,
Edinburgh, 1972.
Selected Justiciary Cases, J. Irvine Smith (editor), volume III, Stair Society,
Edinburgh, 1974.
55
The Earl of Stirling’s register of royal letters relative to affairs of Scotland and Nova
Scotia from 1615 to 1635, William Alexander, Earl of Stirling (editor), volume 2,
Edinburgh, 1885.
Patricia Hanks and Flavia Hodges, Dictionary of First Names, Oxford, 1990.
Maria Leach (editor), Funk & Wagnall’s Standard Dictionary of Folklore, Mythology
and Legend, New York, 1949.
Hew Scott (editor), Fasti Ecclesiae Scoticanae: The Succession of Ministers in the
Church of Scotland from the Reformation, Edinburgh, 1915-28.
Sir John Sinclair (editor), The Statistical Account of Scotland, 1791-1799, Edinburgh,
1791-99.
V. METHODOLOGY
The Source-Book surveyed central sources in Scotland. This included all the Books of
Adjournal, some Circuit Courts books, printed Privy Council material, printed
Parliamentary material, a limited survey of the process papers contained in the JC26
boxes and, what they called, ‘other cases’ which were mainly printed local records or
other people’s surveys of local records. The SSW research team re-surveyed all these
documents, many more central documents, all extant presbytery minutes, and a
sample of kirk session minutes.
The Source-Book did not survey local records or ecclesiastical records. The SSW
surveyed all extant Presbytery documents and sampled kirk session documents. (See
below for a description of the ecclesiastical survey methodology). Other potential
sources, such as sheriff and burgh court records as well as private papers, were
considered. But it was not possible to either survey or sample these efficiently in the
time available. These sources, particularly family papers, may well provide useful
material for future research projects.
People who were mentioned more than once were not collated in the Source-Book,
which meant that there were many duplicates. The book was also organised
chronologically by source type, which makes matching of references to the same
person more difficult for the user. The SSW has rectified the collation problem by
organising the database around each accused person, not around the source, and
citation and typing errors have been corrected as much as was possible. After
Macdonald’s digitised version of the Source-Book was put into the relevant fields in
the SSW database, the researchers eliminated several hundred duplicate people before
they began archival research. In order to avoid further duplication, the researchers
checked the Larner et al. information in the database before creating a new record for
an accused person found in the source material. If the researcher found a match, the
new data was entered into that record. After data collection was completed, the
researchers again eliminated further known duplicates by comparing name, place of
57
residence, dates of mention in the source material, and any other relevant biographical
data. In situations where duplication was suspected, but not provable unequivocally,
the records were not combined and this has been indicated in the notes in the relevant
records.
It was decided at the beginning of the project that it would not be cost effective to re-
check secondary printed sources that had been used by Larner et al. These sources
included many local histories, edited volumes of local records (both secular and
ecclesiastical), family histories and personal diaries, many of which were produced in
the nineteenth or early twentieth centuries. The references given by Larner et al. have
been recorded on the database and we have indicated in the individual records that
there may be more information in the secondary source for other researchers to use.
One researcher examined the central records, while the other concentrated on
ecclesiastical records. All records and new entries were scrutinised weekly to avoid
duplication.
The process papers are organised into 124 boxes that are roughly chronological.
These boxes contain a vast wealth of detail about criminal proceedings in Scotland,
but they present several difficulties. Firstly, only boxes 1563 and 1617 and between
1699 and 1720 are indexed. The remaining boxes are not indexed in any external
lists. Some of the papers in some of the boxes have been grouped into bundles. But
these bundles appear to have been randomly selected and the labels on some of the
bundles cannot be taken as an accurate indication of what is contained in the bundle.
Secondly, the boxes are not consistent in terms of the types of materials included. In
other words, they do not contain uniform information. Some boxes will contain
materials for specific crimes in specific years, such as witchcraft in JC26/26 and
JC26/27 or rounding up fugitives from the Battle of Bothwell Bridge in JC26/62. In
order to be fully comprehensive, all the papers in each box would have to be
examined but the sheer number of boxes prohibited a full survey given the limited
time available to the survey.
The project had two aims for the JC26s. The first was to maximise the witchcraft
material recovered from this source. Secondly, we also wanted to determine whether
witchcraft prosecution in other fully surveyed sources (such as JC2, JC3, the Circuit
Courts and the Privy Council) was predictive of the amount of material in JC26 boxes
corresponding to the same year. This would allow us to make a tentative statement
about whether or not we had missed cases. We could then be more certain about the
accuracy of our final number of cases.
We chose to conduct a full survey of boxes in which Larner et al. found witchcraft
material and to sample other JC26 boxes by year. Starting after 1617, because the
JC26s are indexed up to that year, the last two years in every decade were read in full.
Other known material was also included from boxes that cover other years. This
spread of dates allowed for samples that alternated between years for which we have
few witchcraft prosecutions found in other sources, with years for which many
witchcraft prosecutions were known. We were able to find more information for
already known cases and determine if the JC26s have material on cases that do not
show up in other, already surveyed, materials. Years surveyed by the SSW researcher
were 1618-20, 1628-30, 1638-40, 1648-50, 1658-1662, 1668-70, 1688-90, 1728-9.
(See ‘Database Provenance’ and ‘Bibliography’ for a full listing of JC26 boxes
surveyed.) The sample years break between 1699 and 1720 because they are indexed.
The indexed years confirm the hypothesis that JC26 process papers about witchcraft
mirror cases found in other justiciary sources. No new people accused of witchcraft
showed up in the JC26 process papers between 1699-1720 that were not also recorded
in other sources.
Ecclesiastical records
The church did not have criminal jurisdiction over the witchcraft, but parish ministers
and elders were involved in questioning suspects and witnesses, gathering evidence,
sometimes arresting and warding suspects, referring matters to the secular authorities
and witnessing executions. There were two levels of church court: kirk sessions for
individual parishes, and the higher level presbyteries, which consisted of
representatives from groups of parishes.
The project decided to survey all the surviving presbytery records covering the years
1563 to 1736, since most referrals went through the presbytery before advancing to
59
secular level. This involved 70 sets of presbytery records, with varying volumes of
minutes. Some had as few as one and the highest fourteen. The majority had between
four and seven. In total 392 volumes were surveyed. (See ‘Database Provenance’ and
‘Bibliography’ for a full description of sources surveyed.) This meant that we were
able to identify a number of those who were accused by the church but who did not
advance to secular court level, as well as more information about earlier stages of
investigation for some of those who had secular court trials.
It was impossible to survey all the kirk session material both because of the time
available and also in terms of revealing useful information. Although evidence about
witchcraft investigation is rare in these records, kirk sessions do contain interesting
material so the project decided to sample them. The chances of finding useful
information randomly was very limited therefore the sample had to be organised
efficiently. The possibility of doing a concentrated local study was considered – much
like work that has been done on Fife (by Stuart Macdonald) or Stirling and
Haddington (by Joyce Miller) – as a sample. However, it was decided that it was too
difficult to find a ‘typical’ sample area that would fulfil a range of criteria in order that
we could scale it up to project a legitimate estimated total for the whole country. (See
the interactive graphs on the website that illustrate the difference in distribution
between counties.)
For the purposes of our survey it was decided to concentrate on years of high
prosecution and cover all of the country, not just the areas where witch hunting
occurred. Our hypothesis was that any incident of serious witchcraft investigated by
kirk sessions would normally be referred to the presbytery. To ascertain if this was
correct, we examined all surviving kirk session minutes from the high intensity years.
All kirk session records that survive for the years 1590-1, 1597, 1628-30, 1649 and
1661-2 were surveyed. A total of 203 volumes were examined. (See ‘Database
Provenance’ and ‘Bibliography’ for a full description of sources surveyed.) Although
we found some new information, it was from parishes that we had already identified
as having been involved in witch hunting. When we examined records from parishes
where we suspected there was little or no witch hunting, based on information in
presbytery records, we did not find a significant amount of new information about
kirk session activity. We take this to mean that our hypothesis was correct.
There is potential for further surveying of church records from areas known to have
experienced witch prosecution, but due to time constraints we were unable to sample
kirk session material from non-high intensity years.
60
V. APPENDICES
Steel Thomson
Stein Thorbrand Wanton
Stenhouse Thyne Wark
Steven Todd Warrick
Stevenson Todrick Waten
Stewart Todry Waterson
Stillcart Torr Watson
Stillie Torrie Watt
Stirk Toyes Waugh
Stirt Traill Webster
Stith Traye Weir
Stobie Trotter Welch
Stoddart Trotton Well
Stonehouse Tucidie Wemyss
Stout Tullie Wenton
Stowane Tulloch West
Strachan Turnbull Wharrie
Strath Turner White
Stratton Tweedie Whitelaw
Straughan Twich Whiteman
Studgeon Udny Wick
Sturrok Umpherstoun Wikean
Summer Umphray Wilkie
Sunderland Unchach Wilkin
Supp Unes Wilkinson
Sutherland Unknown William
Sutie Ure Williamson
Swan Urich Wilson
Swinton Vallance Winster
Sydserf Vane Wishart
Syme Vass Wood
Syrie Vayne Woodrow
Tais Veitch Woodside
Tait Velene Wright
Tame Vertie Wylie
Tarbet Vikker Wynd
Task Voe Yerkin
Tasker Waddie Yester
Taylor Walden Young
Temple Walker Yourston
Thom Wallace Yrascht
Thomas' Daughter Wanderson Yule
Borgue Chirnside
Borthwick Clackmannan
Bothwell Clatt
Botriphnie Cleish
Bourtie Closeburn
Bowden Clunie
Bower Cluny
Boyndie Clyne
Bracadale Cockburnspath
Brechin Cockpen
Bressay Coldingham
Broughton Glenholm & Kilbucho Coldstream
Buchanan Coll
Buittle Collace
Bunkle and Preston Collessie
Burntisland Colmonell
Cabrach Colonsay and Oronsay
Cadder Colvend and Southwick
Caddonfoot Comrie
Caerlaverock Contin
Cairnie Cortachy and Clova
Callander Coull
Cambuslang Coupar Angus
Cambusnethan Covington
Cameron Coylton
Campbeltown Craig
Campsie Craigie
Canisbay Craignish
Canonbie Crail
Caputh Crailing
Cardross Cramond
Careston Cranshaws
Cargill Cranston
Carluke Crathie and Braemar
Carmichael Crawford
Carmunnock Crawfordjohn
Carmyllie Creich
Carnbee Crichton
Carnock Crieff
Carnwath Crimond
Carrington Cromarty
Carsphairn Cromdale Inverallan & Advie
Carstairs Cross and Burness
Castleton Crossmichael
Cathcart Croy and Dalcross
Cavers Cruden
Cawdor Cullen
Ceres Culross
Channelkirk Culsalmond
Chapel of Garioch Culter
71
Inveravon Kilmaronock
Inverchaolain Kilmartin
Inveresk Kilmaurs
Inverkeilor Kilmodan
Inverkeithing Kilmonivaig
Inverkeithny Kilmorack
Inverkip Kilmore and Kilbride
Inverness and Bona Kilmory
Inverurie Kilmuir
Irvine Kilmuir Easter
Jedburgh Kilninian and Kilmore
Johnstone Kilninver and Kilmelfort
Jura Kilrenny
Keig Kilspindie
Keir Kilsyth
Keith Kiltarlity and Convinth
Keithhall and Kinkell Kiltearn
Kells Kilwinning
Kelso Kincardine
Kelton Kincardine O'Neil
Kemback Kinclaven
Kemnay Kinellar
Kenmore Kinfauns
Kennethmont King Edward
Kennoway Kingarth
Kettins Kinghorn
Kettle Kinglassie
Kilbarchan Kingoldrum
Kilbirnie Kingsbarns
Kilbrandon and Kilchattan Kingussie and Insh
Kilbride Kinloch
Kilcalmonell Kinloss
Kilchoman Kinnaird
Kilchrenan and Dalavich Kinneff and Catterline
Kilconquhar Kinnell
Kildalton Kinnettles
Kildonan Kinnoull
Kildrummy Kinross
Kilfinan Kintail
Kilfinichen and Kilvickeon Kintore
Killarow and Kilmeny Kippen
Killean and Kilchenzie Kirkbean
Killearn Kirkcaldy and Dysart
Killearnan Kirkcolm
Killin Kirkconnel
Kilmacolm Kirkcowan
Kilmadock Kirkcudbright
Kilmallie Kirkden
Kilmany Kirkgunzeon
Kilmarnock Kirkhill
74
Rayne Speymouth
Reay Spott
Redgorton Sprouston
Renfrew Spynie
Rerrick St Andrews and Deerness
Rescobie St Andrews and St Leonards
Resolis St Andrews-Lhanbryd
Rhu St Boswells
Rhynd St Cyrus
Rhynie St Fergus
Riccarton St Madoes
Roberton St Martins
Rogart St Monance
Rosemarkie St Mungo
Rosneath St Ninians
Rosskeen Stair
Rothes Stenness
Rothesay Stenton
Rothiemay Stevenston
Rousay and Egilsay Stewarton
Roxburgh Stichill
Rutherglen Stirling
Ruthven Stobo
Ruthwell Stonehouse
Saddell and Skipness Stoneykirk
Saline Stornoway
Saltoun Stow
Sandsting Stracathro
Sandwick Strachan
Sanquhar Strachur
Scone Straiton
Scoonie Stranraer
Selkirk Strath
Shapinsay Strathblane
Shotts Strathdon
Skene Strathlachlan
Skirling Strathmiglo
Slains Strichen
Slamannan Stromness
Sleat Stronsay
Smailholm Swinton
Small Isles Symington
Snizort Tain
Sorbie Tannadice
Sorn Tarbat
South Knapdale Tarbolton
South Ronaldsay Tarland
South Uist Tarves
Southdean Tealing
Southend Temple
77
Terregles Twynholm
Teviothead Tynron
Thurso Tyrie
Tibbermore Udny
Tillicoultry Uig
Tingwall Unst
Tinwald Uphall
Tiree Urquhart
Tongland Urquhart and Glenmoriston
Tongue Urquhart and Logie Wester
Torosay Urr
Torphichen Urray
Torryburn Walls and Flotta
Torthorwald Walls and Sandness
Tough Walston
Towie Wamphray
Tranent Watten
Traquair Weem
Trinity Gask Wemyss
Troqueer West Calder
Tulliallan West Kilbride
Tullynessle and Forbes West Linton
Tundergarth Westerkirk
Turriff Westray
Tweedsmuir Westruther
Whitburn Wiston and Roberton
Whitekirk and Tyninghame Yarrow
Whithorn Yell
Whitsome Yester
Whittingehame Yetholm
Wick
Wigtown
The website and database were created by Julian Goodare, Lauren Martin, Joyce
Miller and Louise Yeoman, with financial support from the Economic and Social
Research Council.
The website and database and all of their contents are the copyright of the University
of Edinburgh and reproduction is only permitted in accordance with the following
terms:
You may view the database and download it to file or print for the purposes of private
reference, research or study. You may not (a) store it or print out copies of it (or any
part of it) other than for the purposes set out in this paragraph; or (b) reproduce, copy
or transmit it (or any part of it) in any other way for any purpose or in any other
medium, without our prior written permission.
The project provides free access to the data contained in the Survey of Scottish
Witchcraft database either via the online web interface or from the downloaded full
database. Regardless of how you access our data, the data itself and the database
structure remains under copyright to the authors and the University of Edingburgh.
This requires that full citation of the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft be given for any
use of the data leading to a publication. This includes information generated using
our online web tools, use of information provided in the database, the information
generated from queries produced using the database, and references collected from the
database. Please use your normal citation conventions for websites. We suggest:
Julian Goodare, Lauren Martin, Joyce Miller and Louise Yeoman, ‘The Survey
of Scottish Witchcraft’, www.arts.ed.ac.uk/witches/ (archived January 2003,
accessed ‘[your date]’).
If you use the database to run a query of your own design, you must cite your use of
the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft. You need only reference use of the data. The
query design itself is your own creation.