Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Taccp Vaccp Awareness

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 27
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that HACCP, TACCP and VACCP are risk assessment processes to prevent unintentional food safety hazards, intentional threats to supply chains, and food fraud vulnerabilities respectively. TACCP focuses on threats from ideological contamination while VACCP addresses economic fraud vulnerabilities.

HACCP is for unintentional food safety hazards. TACCP addresses intentional threats to supply chains for ideological reasons through a food defence plan. VACCP mitigates intentional food fraud vulnerabilities for economic gain through a food fraud prevention plan.

The process for developing a TACCP plan involves establishing a threat assessment team, conducting a risk assessment, mapping the supply chain, identifying potential threat steps, assessing risks, identifying and monitoring threat controls, and developing corrective actions.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 1

• HACCP vs TACCP vs VACCP


• TACCP (Food Defence Plan)
- threats
- process
• VACCP (Food Fraud Mitigation Plan)
- vulnerabilities & terminology
- food fraud vulnerability assessment tool
- process
• Auditor’s responsibilities.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 2
• HACCP is designed to prevent unintentional food safety issues
• intentional threats to food safety for ideological reasons is
increasing – requirement for a Food Defence Plan (TACCP) – eg
deliberate contamination/poisoning of food
• food fraud for economic reasons is also increasing – requirement
for a food fraud mitigation plan (VACCP) – eg horse meat being
passed off as minced beef in Europe and melamine added to dairy
products in China.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 3
JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 4
JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 5
• a management process to defend a food supply chain from the
threat of intentional contamination
• TACCP aligns with HACCP, but has a different focus that
may need input from different areas of an organisation (eg
HR, procurement and security)
• threats are different to vulnerabilities as they're performed for
ideological reasons rather than economic reasons.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 6
• malicious contamination of food products
• sabotage of the supply chain
• using food or drink items for terrorism or criminal purposes
• economically motivated adulteration
• extortion
• espionage
• counterfeiting
• cybercrime.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 7
Review cases of food threats:
• http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7868115.stm
• http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/7-sickening-cases-food-
sabotage-4322010

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 8
1. Establish a Threat Assessment Team (should be multi-disciplinary)
2. Develop a risk assessment methodology
3. Develop a flow chart of the supply chain
4. Identify the steps where there is a potential threat to:
• the organisation and key staff
• operations
• product
5. Assess those steps to identify the risk as CCP or CP
6. Identify and monitor threat controls for each CCP.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 9
7. Develop action plan if controls are breached, including immediate
correction and corrective action
8. Document the TACCP Plan
9. Train staff accordingly
10. Regularly review the TACCP Plan.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 10
Regardless of the process used, FSSC 22000, Part 2, Additional
Requirements, Clause 2.1.4.3, requires clients to have a Food
Defence Plan which:
• identifies potential threats
• develops control measures
• prioritises them against the identified threats
• implements those controls.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 11
JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 12
• a management process to defend the food supply chain
from vulnerabilities due to food fraud
• shift in focus from risk to vulnerability
• based on ‘criminological routine activity theory’.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 13
Opportunity related fraud risk factors
+ Motivations related fraud risk factors
- Fraud control measures
= Actual fraud vulnerability.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 14
• substitution
• dilution
• counterfeiting
• unapproved enhancements
• concealment
• mislabelling
• grey market production/diversion.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 15
JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 16
Review cases of food fraud
• http://greenarea.me/en/121121/food-fraud-scandal-uk-toxic-
vodka-pet-food-meat-given-humans/
• https://www.foodqualitynews.com/Trends/Food-fraud

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 17
• one option is to use the tool developed by SSAFE & PwC, which
is accepted by GFSI
• available on-line in Excel, Apple App Store (only for iPad not
iPhone) or Google Play
• Decision Tree to decide ingredient, product, brand, facility,
country or company-wide level
• 50 questions: 9 – opportunities, 20 – motivations, 21 – control
measures
• Spider web diagram
• Report (Food Fraud Mitigation Plan).

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 18
• historical incidents • material value and market
size
• any emerging concerns
• physical form of the material
• economic factors/price
fluctuations • existing control measures
• country/area of origin • availability
• complexity and length of the • ease of access to materials.
supply chain
• storage and distribution
facilities and location

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 19
1. Establish an Vulnerability Assessment Team (multi-disciplinary)
2. Use SSAFE’s Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment Tool (or a
similar tool):
1. use Decision Tree to identify exposure to risk (eg ingredients,
suppliers, customers, product lines, brands, region, company-wide)
2. summarise information resulting from Decision Tree analysis
3. complete questionnaire to identify risks
4. review main spider webs and certainty (opportunities, motivation and
controls)
5. review detailed spider webs (opportunities/motivation vs controls)
6. review risk assessment at Output Sheet.
7. create Report.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 20
Using Report:
3. Develop action plan if controls are breached, including
immediate correction and corrective action
4. Document the VACCP Plan
5. Train staff accordingly
6. Regularly verify VACCP Plan.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 21
Review SSAFE’s Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment Tool
www.ssafe-food.org.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 22
Regardless of the process used, FSSC 22000, Part 2, Additional
Requirements, Clause 2.1.4.4, requires clients to have a Food Fraud
Prevention (Mitigation) Plan which:
• identifies potential threats
• develops control measures
• prioritises them against the identified threats
• implements those controls.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 23
= OPRP/CCP Plan (OPRP & HACCP)
+ Food Defence Plan (TACCP)
+ Food Fraud Mitigation Plan (VACCP).

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 24
• TACCP - ensure client has documented a Food Defence Plan
based on a reasonable risk assessment of the threats to the food
supply chain
• VACCP – ensure client has a documented Food Fraud
Mitigation Plan based on SSAFE’s Food Fraud Vulnerability
Assessment Tool
• TACCP & VACCP – ensure CCPs are being monitored, staff
are appropriately trained and the Plans are regularly reviewed
(annually).

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 25
• HACCP: risk assessment to prevent unintentional food safety
hazards – Food Safety Plan
• TACCP: intentional threat to supply chain for ideological
reasons – Food Defence Plan
• VACCP: intentional food fraud/vulnerability for economic
reasons – Food Fraud Mitigation Plan
• all based on risk assessment to identify risks, implement and
monitor controls, and react to CCPs out of control.

JLB – TACCP-VACCP - # 26
QUESTIONS?

You might also like