Elastic Moduli of Pavement Materials
Elastic Moduli of Pavement Materials
Elastic Moduli of Pavement Materials
CHAPTER 4
ELASTIC MODULI OF PAVEMENT MATERIALS
4-1
TM 5-822-13/AFJMAN 32-1018
b. Thaw periods. The effects of temperature on subgrade materials are considered only with regard to frost
penetration. The basic requirements for frost protection are given in TM 5-822-5/AFM 88-7, Chap. 3.
c. Subgrade moisture content for material characterization. Pavement design is usually predicated on a
subgrade which is assumed to be near-saturation. The design may be based on subgrade with lower moisture
content if available field measurements indicate that the subgrade will not reach saturation. These measure-
ments must reflect the period of the year when the water table is at its highest level, and such designs must
be approached with caution.
4-2
TM 5-822-13/AFJMAN 32-1018
established. If temperature data indicate greater extremes than 40 and 100 degrees F., tests should be
conducted at these extreme ranges, if possible. The modulus value to be used for each strain computation
would be the value applicable for the specific pavement temperature determined from the climatic data.
(b) An indirect method of obtaining an estimated modulus value for bituminous concrete is presented
in detail in TM 5-825-2-l/AFM 88-6, Chap. 2, Section A. Use of this method requires that the ring-and-ball
softening point and the penetration of the bitumen as well as the volume concentration of the aggregate and
percent air voids of the compacted mixture be determined. The modulus of bituminous concrete may also be
estimated from the design pavement temperature using figure 4-2.
(2) Portland cement concrete (PCC). The modulus of elasticity and flexural strength of PCC will be
determined from static flexural beam tests in accordance with ASTM C 78. When test results are not
available, a modulus value of 4,000,000 psi may be assumed for the concrete. Proportioning of the concrete
mix and control of the concrete for pavement construction will be in accordance with TM 5-822-7/AFM 88-
6, Chap. 8.
(3) Unbound granular base and subbase course materials. The terms "unbound granular base course
material" and "unbound granular subbase course material" as used herein refer to materials meeting grading
requirements and other requirements for base and subbase for roads and streets, respectively. These materials
are characterized by use of a chart in which the modulus is a function of the underlying layer and the layer
thickness. The chart and the procedure for use of the chart are given in appendix B. The modulus values of
unbound granular bases may also be determined from cyclic triaxial tests on prepared samples. The recom-
mended test procedure is outlined in TM 5-825-3-1/AFM 88-6, Chap. 3, Section A. The base course under
a rigid pavement can be unbound granular or a chemically stabilized material. Design using stabilized
materials is described in the next section.
(4) Stabilized material. The term "stabilized material" as used herein refers to soil treated with such
agents as bitumen, portland cement, slaked or hydrated lime, and flyash or a combination of such agents to
obtain a substantial increase in the strength of the material over the material's untreated natural strength.
4-3
TM 5-822-13/AFJMAN 32-1018
Stabilization with portland cement, lime, flyash, or other agent that causes a chemical cementation to occur
shall be referred to as chemical stabilization. Chemically treated soils having unconfined compressive
strengths greater than the minimum strength are considered to be stabilized materials and should be tested
in accordance with the methods specified for stabilized materials. Chemically treated soils having unconfined
compressive strengths less than the minimum strength are considered to be modified soils. Most likely this
will result in using the maximum allowable subgrade modulus. Bituminous-stabilized materials should be
characterized in the same manner as bituminous concrete. Stabilized materials other than bituminous
stabilized should be characterized using cracked section criteria, which is explained later in conjunction with
figure 4-3.
(a) Stabilized materials for the base and subbase must meet the strength and durability requirement
of TM 5-822-14/AFJMAN 32-1018. The basic strength requirements are presented in table 4-1.
(b) Lime-stabilized materials will continue to gain strength with time; therefore, if sufficient evidence
is available that indicates a lime-stabilized material will acquire adequate strength prior to traffic, then the 28-
day strength requirement may be waived.
(c) For concrete pavements having a stabilized base or subbase, the determination of elastic modulus
values becomes more complicated than for the pavement with unbound granular base. Two cases in particular
should be considered. In the first case, where the stabilized layer is considered to be continuous with cracking
due only to curing and temperature, the elastic modulus values may be determined from flexural beam tests.
In the second case, the stabilized layer is considered cracked because of load. Once the cracks have
developed extensively in the stabilized base, the layer would behave as a granular material but with a higher
modulus value. The cracked stabilized base course is represented by a reduced resilient modulus value, which
is determined from the relationship between resilient modulus and unconfined compressive strength shown
in figure 4-3. This relationship may be used for concrete pavement design for roads and streets.
(d) The general, material, and compaction requirements of base courses under a pavement are
described in TM 5-822-5/AFM 88-7, Chap. 3.
(5) Subgrade soils. The term "subgrade" as used herein refers to the natural, processed, or fill soil
foundation not meeting the requirements for a base or subbase on which a pavement structure is placed. The
modulus of the subgrade is determined through the use of the repetitive triaxial test. The procedure is
described in TM 5-825-2-1/AFM 88-6, Chap. 2, Section A. For most subgrade soils, the modulus is greatly
affected by changes in moisture content and state of stress. As a result of normal moisture migration, water
table fluctuation, and other factors, the moisture content of the subgrade soil can increase and approach
saturation with only a slight change in density. Since the strength and stiffness of fine-grained materials are
particularly affected by such an increase in moisture content, these soils should be tested in the near-
saturation state.
(a) Procedures for specimen preparation, testing, and interpretation of test results for cohesive and
granular subgrades are presented in TM 5-825-2-1/AFM 88-6, Chap. 2, Section A. For the layered elastic
theory of flexible pavement design, the maximum allowable modulus for a subgrade soil should be restricted
to 30,000 pounds per square inch (psi).
(b) In areas where the subgrade is to be subjected to freeze-thaw cycles, the subgrade modulus must
be determined during the thaw-weakened state. Testing soils subject to freeze-thaw requires specialized test
apparatus and procedures. The Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratories (CRREL) can assist
in characterizing subgrade soils subjected to freeze-thaw.
(c) For some design situations, estimating the resilient modulus of the subgrade (MR) based on
available information may be necessary when conducting the repetitive load triaxial tests. An estimate of the
resilient modulus can be made from the relationship of MR = 1500 C CBR, where CBR is the California
Bearing Ratio. This relationship provides a method for checking the reasonableness of the laboratory results.
4-4
TM 5-822-13/AFJMAN 32-1018
The relationship shown in figure 4-4 may be used to estimate the elastic modulus from the modulus of soil
reaction k. It is to be noted that the relationship shown in figure 4-4 is established based on limited data. The
modulus of soil reaction k can be determined using the plate-bearing test in the field or from table 4-2 when
field test results are not available.
4-5
TM 5-822-13/AFJMAN 32-1018
b. Poisson's ratio. Poisson's ratio is difficult to determine and has relatively minor influence on the design
compared to other parameters. Therefore, commonly recognized values of Poisson's ratio are used. These
values are as follows:
4-6
TM 5-822-13/AFJMAN 32-1018
4-7