Lecture Notes Project Management Principles Course Notes Part 1
Lecture Notes Project Management Principles Course Notes Part 1
3004ENG
P R O J E C T M A NAG E M E N T
PRINCIPLES
Prepared by
2013
COURSE OVERVIEW
Introduction
It is widely acknowledged that projects play an important role in many sectors of industry;
successful projects are considered a critical driving force for many organisations’ operations.
Because of the unique nature of a project, a particular set of managerial knowledge, skills and
abilities (KSAs) is required to successfully managing the project. Understanding and being able to
apply these KSAs is therefore important for graduates in their future careers to effectively perform
as a leader or member of a project team. As a result, 3004ENG Project Management Principles has
been developed as a core course to provide engineering and architecture students an overview of the
basic principles and techniques required for the evaluation, planning and management of projects
from inception through to completion. Although this course was developed within the engineering
context, its core element is largely concerned with generic project management framework.
Therefore students will be able to apply the KSAs developed in this course to the broader project
management context, such as architecture, business and technology.
Aims
This course deals with general principles of project management such as project definition, project
evaluation and selection, project planning and monitoring and project close out. The core elements
taught in the course complements the material taught in the program and therefore helps the student
to gain comprehensive knowledge about project management fundamentals. The primary aim of the
course is to provide engineering and architecture students with basic principles of project
management and their applications to real-life projects.
Learning Objectives
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
1. Identify preferred meanings or definitions of a range of project management concepts,
techniques and terminologies
2. Apply numerical techniques to solve project management problems and make appropriate
recommendations
3. Describe key project management concepts/techniques and link them to real-world context
4. Effectively work in a team to analyse project management practices of real-world projects,
identify good and poor practices, and summarise key lessons learnt
Main References
Meredith, J. R. and Mantel, S. J. (2009), Project Management: A Managerial Approach, 7th edition,
John Wiley and Sons.
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H. (2008), Project Management for Business, Engineering, and
Technology, 3rd edition, Elsevier.
Project Management Institute (2008), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
(PMBOK), 4th edition
Smith, N. J. (2008), Engineering Project Management, 3rd edition, Blackwell Publishing.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Week Topic Module
1 Course Orientation: Introduction to the course, including the N/A
explanations of lecture contents to be covered, general rules,
requirements and assessment items
2 Introduction to Project Management: Introduction to project Module 1
management (basic definitions, the need for project managements,
types of organisational structure and their impacts on project
management, etc)
3 Project Lifecycle: Project lifecycles, Project scoping and integration Module 2
4 Project Stakeholder Management: Project stakeholder definitions, Module 3
Identifying project stakeholder and requirements, Project stakeholder
management framework.
5 Project Selection: Fundamental of engineering economics, economic Module 4
evaluation techniques/cash flow analysis
6 Project Selection (cont'd): decision analysis Module 4
7 Mid Semester Exam (No Class) Modules 1-4
8 Project Procurement Management: Project procurement and Module 5
project supply chain, types of contract, project procurement strategy
and process.
9 Project Planning: Fundamental of project planning, project Module 6
scheduling using deterministic approach
10 Project Planning (cont'd): Project resource planning and Module 6
management, Project risk management.
11 Project Monitoring and Control: Project Monitoring and Control Module 7
using Earned Value Analysis (EVA) technique
12 Project Audit and Termination: Project audit and termination Module 8
processes
13 Lecture Review Modules 5-8
ASSESSMENT ITEMS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.2. Outline
Definitions of project
Project objectives
Project, program and portfolio
The meanings of “project management” and “project manager”
The roles of a project manager
Influence of organisational structures on project management
When to use project management
Texts Chapter/Section
Meredith, J. R. and Mantel, S. J. (2009), Project Chapter 1: Project in Contemporary
Management: A Managerial Approach, 7th edition, Organisations
John Wiley and Sons.
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H. (2008), Project Introduction
Management for Business, Engineering, and Chapter 1: What is Project
Technology, 3rd edition, Elsevier. Management?
Figure 1-3: The difference between project, program and portfolio (Kloppenborg, 2009)
The projectised structure is ideal for effectively managing a project but it may not be applicable to
every organisation, particularly a non-project organisation.
2.2. Outline
Definitions and characteristics of project life cycle
Project life cycle phases
Conception
Definition
Execution
Cost influence curve
System thinking approach
Texts Chapter/Section
Meredith, J. R. and Mantel, S. J. (2009), Project Chapter 1: Project in Contemporary
Management: A Managerial Approach, 7th edition, Organisations
John Wiley and Sons.
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H. (2008), Project Chapter 3: System Development Cycle
Management for Business, Engineering, and and Project Conception
Technology, 3rd edition, Elsevier.
Project Management Institute (2008), A Guide to the Chapter 1: Introduction
Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), Chapter 2: Project Lifecycle and
4th edition. Organization
The “Conception” phase involves project initiation, feasibility study and proposal
preparation
The “Definition” phase involves clarification of user requirements, preparation of detailed
system requirement and a project master plan, and reviewing requirements and plan with the
clients
The “Execution” phase involves the detailed design, production/build, implementation and
termination
PLC provides the basic framework for managing the project, regardless of the specific work
involved (Meredith & Mantel, 2009; PMI, 2008)
Figure 2-2: Pattern of cumulative project progress over PLC (Meredith & Mantel, 2009)
Figure 2-3: Pattern of level of effort required over PLC (Meredith & Mantel, 2009)
Contents
– Statement of Work (SOW)
– Proposal requirements
– Contractual provisions
– Additional information or data
(Source: http://www.island.lk/userfiles/image/2010/09/28/p3.jpg)
Figure 2-8: Example of WBS for building a house (Nicholas & Steyn, 2008)
Responsibility Matrix
A responsibility matrix is used to show the connections between work that needs to be done and
project team members.
3.2. Outline
Overview of project stakeholder management
Definitions and types of project stakeholders
Project stakeholder management process
Relevant concepts and techniques in managing project stakeholders
Stakeholder Matrix
Requirement Analysis
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Kansei Engineering
Value Management
Concurrent Engineering
Texts Chapter/Section
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H. (2008), Project Chapter 3: System Development Cycle
Management for Business, Engineering, and and Project Conception
Technology, 3rd edition, Elsevier. Chapter 4: Project and System
Definition
Project Management Institute (2008), A Guide to the Chapter 10: Project Communications
Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), Management
4th edition.
Smith, N. J. (2008), Engineering Project Management, Chapter 2: Value Management
3rd edition, Blackwell Publishing.
Standards Australia (2007), Australian Standard: Value All
Management (AS4183: 2007).
Managing project stakeholders mainly involve the understanding of each stakeholder group and
then to develop and implement necessary strategies to manage them. Building rapport and good
relationships with the stakeholders is an ideal strategy to successful stakeholder management.
Table 3-1: Top 10 early warning signs of project failure (out of 53) (Kappleman, McKeenan &
Zhang, 2006)
Value Management
Concurrent Engineering
However, it should be noted that the requirements stated by the customers/clients may not
completely reflect their actual needs. Therefore, more effort is required to fully satisfying certain
customers/clients, as they can fall into one or more of the following categories:
Expecters – Base level of service and value that must be provided in order to be in business.
Spoken – It represents the spoken or verbalised wants of the customer, and is typical of most
market research activities. For example, when questioned, a customer may want a hot pie,
but not too hot, or fast service at a takeaway shop. To the degree to which an organisation
delivers these attributes, the customer will be very satisfied and even “delighted”.
Unspoken – Represents the requirements that a customer will not talk about or request. This
is because they assume these requirements will be there. They are expected, and therefore
not expressed. If unspoken requirements are present the customer will be indifferent. For
example, a customer will not be “delighted” with a non-poisonous pie. However, if
unspoken requirements are missing the customer will be extremely dissatisfied.
Exciters – This type of requirement is unspoken and unexpected. If it is absent the customer
will not be dissatisfied. If present and well implemented incredible levels of customer
satisfaction can be delivered. Exciters can also be described as customer delights or as
pleasant surprises. For example, a base model car that provides radio control on the steering
wheel may be described as an exciter.
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a methodology for translating customer needs into specific
system or product characteristics, and then for specifying the processes and tasks needed to produce
that system or product.
The ideal lunch example attempts to identify what a customer may require and how that will
be achieved in terms of developing the ideal lunch. Issues that may have to addressed
include:
Once the “whats” have been identified they are weighted for customer importance. The
“hows” are in turn rated for their effectiveness in satisfying each “what”. A simple table can
be developed to assign the relationships between the “hows” and the “whats” (see Figure
3.8). A calculation can then be performed and each “how” can be ranked in order of
importance (see Figure 3.9).
Figure 3-7: Relationships between the customer requirements (whats) and services (hows)
Figure 3-8: Absolute scores calculated from the relationship strength and weighting
The House of Quality involves building a relationship matrix that matches customer
requirements (Whats) to design requirements or operation parameters (Hows). The QFD
process requires input from many disciplines including engineering, manufacturing, design,
marketing and sales. Therefore QFD is a powerful integrative device and works best if there
is an ongoing history of cross-functional co-operation.
Customer requirements are usually not directly actionable and must be translated into the
internal technical language of the organisation before building the House of Quality.
In economics, there are various valuation techniques. For example, options pricing, hedonic
method, travel cost method, contingent valuation, etc.
The notion of value can be divided into two ways of thinking:
Hard System Thinking: Its common characteristic is a high level of performance and
capability relative to its cost. This can also be expressed as maximising the function
of a product relative to its cost.
Value for Money (VFM) is a measure used for comparing alternatives based on the
relationship between value and total cost. VFM may be improved in a number of ways, as
shown in the figure below.
“VM is a structured and analytical process which follows a prescribed work plan to achieve best
value, or where appropriate, best value for money” (Standards Australia, 2007).
VM benefits include:
Improved communication and teamworking
A shared understanding among key participants
Better quality project definition
Increased innovation
The elimination of unnecessary cost
4.2. Outline
Overview of project selection
Economic evaluation of projects
Decision analysis
Project selection based on multiple criteria
Texts Chapter/Section
Meredith, J. R. and Mantel, S. J. (2009), Project Chapter 2: Strategic Management and
Management: A Managerial Approach, 7th edition, Project Selection
John Wiley and Sons.
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H. (2008), Project Chapter 10: Managing Risks in
Management for Business, Engineering, and Projects – Decision Trees
Technology, 3rd edition, Elsevier.
costs are the amounts to be spent to create and sustain the project
The benefits must include all the tangible and intangible effects
The costs should include interest, depreciation, operation, maintenance and any other
charges attributable to the project
Numerical Modelling
Fundamental approaches, (the focus of this course), include:
– Economic evaluation/Financial modelling
– Decision analysis – under certainty, uncertainty, risk
– Multi-criteria project selection
Advanced techniques include:
– Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
– Artificial Neural Network (ANN)
– Goal programming
F
P F(1 i ) n
(1 i ) n
This result means that $620.92 “deposited” today at 10 percent compounded annually will
yield $1,000 in 5 years.
Pi 1 i
n
A
1 i n 1
Uniform series present worth: P = A(P/A, i, n)
P
A (1 i) n 1
i(1 i ) n
Example: How much would be needed today to provide an annual amount of $50,000 each
year for 20 years, at 9% interest each year?
P = $50,000 (P/A, 9%, 20)
= $50,000 (9.1285) = $456,427
A(1 i )n 1
F
i
Fi
A
(1 i ) n 1
Example: How much will you have in 40 years if you save $3,000 each year and your
account earns 8% interest each year?
F = $3,000 (F/A, 8%, 40)
= $3,000 (259.0565)
= $777,170
a) Payback Period
The length of time until the original investment has been recouped by the project.
A shorter payback period is better.
Example:
Project Cost
Payback Period
Annual Cash Flow
$100,000
Payback Period 4
$25,000
b) Present Worth
In a Present Worth (PW) comparison of alternatives, the cash flows associated with each
alternative investment are all converted to a present sum of money.
Converting all cash flows to present worth is often referred to as discounting; (hence PW is
also referred to as Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) technique). In this case, interest rate in the
formula is referred to as discount rate.
The Net Present Value (NPV) of an investment is simply the difference between cash
outflows and cash inflows on a present value basis.
NPV = ∑ Present Worth (Benefits) - ∑ Present Worth (Costs)
Example:
What is the net present value of this project? Is the project an acceptable investment?
Salvage Value
$20,000(P/F, 12%, 10) $6,440
Net Present Value $8,440 (Greater than zero, therefore acceptable project)
Alternatively, the Single Payment Present Worth formula can be used to calculate present worth:
Annual Cash Inflows = $40,000(P/F, 12%, 10) + $40,000(P/F, 12%, 9) + $40,000(P/F,
12%, 8) + $40,000(P/F, 12%, 7) + $40,000(P/F, 12%, 6) + $40,000(P/F, 12%, 5) +
$40,000(P/F, 12%, 4) + $40,000(P/F, 12%, 3) + $40,000(P/F, 12%, 2) + $40,000(P/F,
12%, 1) = $226,000
Example:
Project A Project B
Present value cash inflows $500,000 $100,000
Present value cash outflows $300,000 $ 50,000
Net Present Value $200,000 $ 50,000
Benefit/Cost Ratio 1.67 ($500,000/$300,000) 2.00 ($100,000/$50,000)
d) Rate of Return
The discount rate (r) that causes the NPV to be zero (that is, ∑PW cash inflows = ∑PW cash
outflows)
In general, the calculation procedure involves a trial-and-error solution
Often referred to as Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
The higher the IRR, the better
Example:
Given an investment project having the following annual cash flows; find the IRR.
Step 1: Pick an interest rate and solve for the NPV. Try r =15%
NPV = -30 -1(P/F,1,15%) + 5(P/F,2,15) + 5.5(P/F,3,15) + 4(P/F,4,15) + 17(P/F,5,15) +
20(P/F,6,15) + 20(P/F,7,15) - 2(P/F,8,15) + 10(P/F,9,15)
= + $5.62
Since the NPV>0, 15% is not the IRR. It now becomes necessary to select a higher interest
rate in order to reduce the NPV value.
Step 2: If r =20% is used, the NPV = - $ 1.66 and therefore this rate is too high.
Step 3: By interpolation, the correct value for the IRR is determined to be r =18.7%
1. Maximax Criterion
• The optimistic approach
• Assume the best payoff will occur for each alternative
2. Maximin Criterion
• The pessimistic approach
• Assume the worst payoff will occur for each alternative
Assume that the probabilities of the outcomes are known. EMV can be calculated for each
alternative.
Another example: Combining decision making under risk with present worth technique
A company is considering an investment based on an estimated cash flow for each possible
business scenario below. Determine whether the company should make an investment.
Assume i=15%.
Final
Outcomes
Example: Refer to Fair & Square Shed Ltd from Decision Making Under Risk section
Example:
A company is deciding whether to bid for a certain project or not. They estimate that merely
preparing the bid will cost $10,000. If their company bid then they estimate that there is a
50% chance that their bid will be put on the "short-list", otherwise their bid will be rejected.
Once "short-listed" the company will have to supply further detailed information (entailing
costs estimated at $5,000). After this stage their bid will either be accepted or rejected.
They are considering three possible bid prices, namely $155,000, $170,000 and $190,000,
including the decision to abandon the bid. They estimate that the probability of these bids
being accepted (once they have been short-listed) is 0.90, 0.75 and 0.35 respectively. The
company estimate that the labour and material costs associated with the contract are
$127,000.
What should the company do and what is the expected monetary value of your suggested
course of action?
It is recommended that the company should prepare a bid, and, if get short listed, should bid
for $170,000.
This is different from comparing projects based on a single criterion in which the best value project
is selected based on a single criterion, such as highest B/C ratio, NPV, or EMV (as in the previous
sections).
Background
Stage 1 of the Hinze Dam, completed in 1976, provided storage capacity of 42,400 million litres,
which was increased to 161,070 million liters with the completion of Stage 2 in 1989.
The Stage 3 upgrade will raise the Hinze Dam embankment from 93.5 meters to 106 meters,
providing a total capacity of 286,500 million litres.
Among many project alternatives, HSD3 was selected mainly based on:
Sound economic justification
It simultaneously satisfies two major criteria:
1. To achieve flood mitigation objectives that are in line with Gold Coast City
Council’s commitment. Currently over 4,000 existing properties downstream of
Hinze Dam could potentially be affected in a 1:100 year flood event and result in
$147 M in damages.
2. To augment the capacity and reliability of water supply in line with the Gold
ENG PMP Course Notes Part
Coast Water Futures & the Queensland Government’s South East Queensland
Regional Water Supply Strategy (SEQRWSS) findings.
7. A local city council will build an aqueduct to bring water in from the upper part of the state. It can be
built at a reduced size now for $300 million and be enlarged 25 years hence for an additional $350
million (incur at the end of year 25). An alternative is to conduct a full-size aqueduct now for $400
million. Both alternatives would provide the needed capacity for the 50-year analysis period.
Maintenance costs are small and may be ignored. At 6% interest, which alternative should be selected?
8. A company is planning to buy a machine to improve its current operating capacity. There is a choice
between purchasing a brand new machine or a used one. Based on the information provided in the
following table, determine which machine the company should invest in, given i = 12% per year.
9. Three alternative designs are being considered for a potential improvement project related to the
operation of your department. The prospective cash flows for these alternatives are shown in the
following table, and the discount rate is 15% per year.
10. The Miramar Company is going to introduce one of three new products: a widget, a hummer, or a
nimnot. The market conditions (favorable, stable, or unfavorable) will determine the profit or loss the
company realizes, as shown in the following payoff table.
Market Conditions
Product Favorable Stable Unfavorable
(prob = 0.2) (prob = 0.7) (prob = 0.1)
Widget $120,000 $70,000 –$30,000
Hummer $60,000 $40,000 $20,000
Nimnot $35,000 $30,000 $30,000
a. Compute the expected value for each decision and select the best one
b. Assume that probabilities cannot be assigned to future market conditions, and determine the best
decision using the maximax, maximin, and equal likelihood criteria.
11. Andy Hamish has come into an inheritance from his grandparents. He is attempting to decide among
several investment alternatives. The return after one year is primarily dependent on the interest rate
during the next year. The rate is currently 7%, and he anticipates it will stay the same or go up or down
by at most 2 points. The various investment alternatives plus their returns ($10,000) given the interest
rate changes are shown in the following table.
Interest Rates
Investments
5% 6% 7% 8% 9%
b. Assume that Andy, with the help of a financial newsletter and some library research, has been able to
assign probabilities to each of the possible interest rates during the year as follows:
Interest Rate 5% 6% 7% 8% 9%
Probability 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1
12. Kookaburra Electric Service is an electrical utility company providing services in the South East
Queensland region. It is considering replacing some of its equipment at a generating substation and is
attempting to decide whether it should replace an older, existing PCB transformer. (PCB is a toxic
chemical known formally as polychlorinated biphenyl.) Even though the PCB generator meets all current
regulations, if an incident occurred, such as a fire, and PCB contamination caused harm either to
neighboring businesses or farms or to the environment, the company would be liable for damages.
Recent court cases have shown that simply meeting utility regulations does not relieve a utility of
liability if an incident causes harm to others. Also, courts have been awarding large damages to
individuals and businesses harmed by hazardous incidents.
If the utility replaces the PCB transformer, no PCB incidents will occur, and the only cost will be that of
the transformer, $85,000. Alternatively, if the company decides to keep the existing PCB transformer,
then management estimates there is a 50-50 chance of there being a high likelihood of an incident or a
low likelihood of an incident. For the case in which there is a high likelihood that an incident will occur,
there is a .004 probability that a fire will occur sometime during the remaining life of the transformer and
a .996 probability that no fire will occur. If a fire occurs, there is a .20 probability that it will be bad and
the utility will incur a very high cost of approximately $90 million for the cleanup, whereas there is a .80
probability that the fire will be minor and a cleanup can be accomplished at a low cost of approximately
$8 million. If no fire occurs, then no cleanup costs will occur. For the case in which there is a low
likelihood of an incident occurring, there is a .001 probability that a fire will occur during the life of the
existing transformer and a .999 probability that a fire will not occur. If a fire does occur, then the same
probabilities exist for the incidence of high and low cleanup costs, as well as the same cleanup costs, as
indicated for the previous case. Similarly, if no fire occurs, there is no cleanup cost.
Perform a decision tree analysis of this problem for Kookaburra Electric Service and indicate the
recommended solution.
13. The Metal Exploration Group (MEG) is a company set up to conduct geological explorations of parcels
of land in order to ascertain whether significant metal deposits (worthy of further commercial
exploitation) are present or not. Currently, MEG has an option to purchase outright a parcel of land for
$3m.
If MEG purchases this parcel of land then it will conduct a geological exploration of the land. Past
experience indicates that for the type of parcel of land under consideration geological explorations cost
approximately $1m and yield significant metal deposits as follows:
• manganese 1% chance
• gold 0.05% chance
• silver 0.2% chance
Only one of these three metals is ever found (if at all), i.e. there is no chance of finding two or more of
these metals and no chance of finding any other metal.
If manganese is found then the parcel of land can be sold for $30m, if gold is found then the parcel of
land can be sold for $250m and if silver is found the parcel of land can be sold for $150m.
MEG can, if they wish, pay $750,000 for the right to conduct a three-day test exploration before
deciding whether to purchase the parcel of land or not. Such three-day test explorations can only give a
preliminary indication of whether significant metal deposits are present or not and past experience
indicates that three-day test explorations cost $250,000 and indicate that significant metal deposits are
present 50% of the time.
If the three-day test exploration indicates significant metal deposits then the chances of finding
manganese, gold and silver increase to 3%, 2% and 1% respectively. If the three-day test exploration
fails to indicate significant metal deposits then the chances of finding manganese, gold and silver
decrease to 0.75%, 0.04% and 0.175% respectively.
By using decision analysis under risk technique, what would you recommend MEG to do? Show all
your working and comment on the findings.