Clinical Evaluation Tool Revised 8 12
Clinical Evaluation Tool Revised 8 12
Clinical Evaluation Tool Revised 8 12
Student : Faculty:
Course: Semester: Year: Clinical Site:
Introduction: This clinical evaluation tool consists of nine essential competencies with specific performance criteria. The nine competencies were
drawn from: terminal outcome objectives for the BSN program at UNC Chapel Hill School of Nursing, The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education
for Professional Nursing Practice (AACN, 2008), and Quality and Safety Education in Nursing (Cronenwett et al., 2007). The performance criteria
for each competency include cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning and provide a complete evaluation of an individual
student’s clinical performance. The use of this clinical evaluation tool makes it possible to see the student’s development over time as he/she
progresses through the specific course, as well as through the nursing curriculum. It also provides standard measures for student, course, and
program evaluation.
This clinical evaluation tool is to be used in each clinical course. A formal evaluation is completed and shared with the student at the
conclusion of the rotation. In some courses, faculty will also use this tool for mid-rotation evaluation. The tool can also be used at other
times during the rotation and can serve as the basis for a learning contract.
Instructions: Faculty will rate students on each of nine competencies using the designated rating scale, considering the quality of the
performance (Almost Never Exhibits to Almost Always Exhibits) and the amount of guidance required (Almost Always Requires to Almost
Never Requires). Referring to the scale below, as students improve in accuracy, safety, and efficiency, it is expected that they will require less
guidance. To determine the rating for each competency, faculty will consider student performance on the specific performance criteria and will
arrive at a rating for each competency using the 0-4 scale. Faculty may also include comments related to each competency. At the end of this
clinical evaluation tool, faculty should write summary comments and document recommendations for further development/improvement. The
faculty who wrote the evaluation will review it with the student and document the date of the meeting. The student should be provided with a copy
of the evaluation. Students may be asked to complete a self-evaluation at midterm and final. Clinical faculty should discuss the tool with students
at the beginning of each clinical rotation and describe how and when it will be used.
NOTE: In these competencies, client is defined as the recipient of professional nursing services and may be an individual, family, or group.
Expected Levels of Performance: For the Final Evaluation students must achieve the minimal expected level of performance for each
competency in order to pass the course and progress in the program.
c. Integrates theory from nursing, natural and social sciences to enhance client f. Identifies issues/problems in nursing practice that need to be improved
care g. Evaluates nursing practices based on current research evidence
d. Relates pathophysiology and epidemiology of disease(s) to clients’
assessment findings, medications, laboratory and diagnostic test results,
medical and nursing interventions
Faculty Comments MIDTERM Student Comments
Rating: Rating:
7. Communicates effectively
a. Produces clear, relevant, organized, and thorough writing d. Listens attentively and respectfully to others
b. Exhibits timely, legally accurate, and appropriate documentation e. Is actively involved in team building, fostering collegiality, and encouraging
c. Communicates therapeutically with clients utilizing verbal and nonverbal cooperation
skills f. Contributes insight and helpful information to the health care team/group
conferences
Faculty Comments MIDTERM Student Comments
Rating: Rating:
Midterm Evaluation
Final Evaluation
By typing their names below, the student and the faculty acknowledge that a meeting was held on < date > to discuss this evaluation and that a copy of this evaluation
was provided to the student.
Revised 8/12