EVALUATION RUBRIC: RESEARCH STUDY TOPIC DEFENSE

Topic The Design of Portable Evacuation Wheelchair.

Proponents 1.John Ronald D. Acda 2.Edwin Malabanan 3.Donald Marc Castillo

Program Bachelor of Science in Mechanical engineering Group No. 2
___________________________________________________________________________________
Point System Legend: 1 – Needs Significant Improvement; 2 – Needs improvement; 3 – Acceptable; 4 – Very Good; 5 – Excellent

Please check the appropriate points based assessment criteria. 1 2 3 4 5

1. Problem Definition: States the research problem/ objectives clearly, providing motivation
for undertaking the research.
2. Problem Identification: States the relation of the problem identified aligned to the
university’s research agenda
3. Technology Gap/ Opportunity Identification: Research study to possibly fill the gap
between the existing and the desired condition
4. Solution Identification: The research study is the possible solution for the problem
identified.
5. Local relevance of the solution: Application of the study intended to help the community
and others
6. Program Significant of the Solution: Relatively based on the field of practice
7. Quality of Oral Communications: Communicates clearly and professionally. Questions
directly and succinctly.
8. Critical Thinking: Demonstrates capability for independent research in the area of study.
Preparedness in core disciplines relevant to research, and ability to complete the research.
9. Format and Organization. Document is well-organized and logical. Guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.
10. Answers to questions. Demonstrate knowledge related to topic and research agenda.
Total Score : _______
Points Equivalent : _______
Notes:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

________ Does not pass/ Re-defense (24 points and below)

________ For reconsideration after major revisions (25 – 33 points)
________ Pass with Minor revisions (34 – 42 points)
________ Accepted in present Form (43 points & above)

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Panellist: ________________________________Signature: _______________________________Date:______________
 EVALUATION RUBRIC: RESEARCH STUDY TOPIC DEFENSE
Topic Portable Smoke Ejector

Proponents 1.John Ronald D. Acda 2.Edwin S. Malabanan 3.Donnald Marc Castillo

Program Bachelor of Science in Mechanical engineering Group No. 2
___________________________________________________________________________________
Point System Legend: 1 – Needs Significant Improvement; 2 – Needs improvement; 3 – Acceptable; 4 – Very Good; 5 – Excellent

Please check the appropriate points based assessment criteria. 1 2 3 4 5

1. Problem Definition: States the research problem/ objectives clearly, providing motivation
for undertaking the research.
2. Problem Identification: States the relation of the problem identified aligned to the
university’s research agenda
3. Technology Gap/ Opportunity Identification: Research study to possibly fill the gap
between the existing and the desired condition
4. Solution Identification: The research study is the possible solution for the problem
identified.
5. Local relevance of the solution: Application of the study intended to help the community
and others
6. Program Significant of the Solution: Relatively based on the field of practice
7. Quality of Oral Communications: Communicates clearly and professionally. Questions
directly and succinctly.
8. Critical Thinking: Demonstrates capability for independent research in the area of study.
Preparedness in core disciplines relevant to research, and ability to complete the research.
9. Format and Organization. Document is well-organized and logical. Guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.
10. Answers to questions. Demonstrate knowledge related to topic and research agenda.
Total Score : _______
Points Equivalent : _______
Notes:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

________ Does not pass/ Re-defense (24 points and below)

________ For reconsideration after major revisions (25 – 33 points)
________ Pass with Minor revisions (34 – 42 points)
________ Accepted in present Form (43 points & above)

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Panellist: ________________________________Signature: _______________________________Date:______________
 EVALUATION RUBRIC: RESEARCH STUDY TOPIC DEFENSE
Topic Semi-Automatic Motor Bike Side Stand Slider with Brake Failure Indicator For Both Brakes

Proponents 1.John Ronald D. Acda 2.Edwin Malabanan 3.Donald Marc Castillo

Program Bachelor of Science in Mechanical engineering Group No. 2
___________________________________________________________________________________
Point System Legend: 1 – Needs Significant Improvement; 2 – Needs improvement; 3 – Acceptable; 4 – Very Good; 5 – Excellent

Please check the appropriate points based assessment criteria. 1 2 3 4 5

1. Problem Definition: States the research problem/ objectives clearly, providing motivation
for undertaking the research.
2. Problem Identification: States the relation of the problem identified aligned to the
university’s research agenda
3. Technology Gap/ Opportunity Identification: Research study to possibly fill the gap
between the existing and the desired condition
4. Solution Identification: The research study is the possible solution for the problem
identified.
5. Local relevance of the solution: Application of the study intended to help the community
and others
6. Program Significant of the Solution: Relatively based on the field of practice
7. Quality of Oral Communications: Communicates clearly and professionally. Questions
directly and succinctly.
8. Critical Thinking: Demonstrates capability for independent research in the area of study.
Preparedness in core disciplines relevant to research, and ability to complete the research.
9. Format and Organization. Document is well-organized and logical. Guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.
10. Answers to questions. Demonstrate knowledge related to topic and research agenda.
Total Score : _______
Points Equivalent : _______
Notes:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

________ Does not pass/ Re-defense (24 points and below)

________ For reconsideration after major revisions (25 – 33 points)
________ Pass with Minor revisions (34 – 42 points)
________ Accepted in present Form (43 points & above)

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Panellist: ________________________________Signature: _______________________________Date:______________
 EVALUATION RUBRIC: RESEARCH STUDY TOPIC DEFENSE
Topic Solar Powered Vaccine/Medicine Preservator Using Thermoelectric
refrigeration

Proponents 1.John Ronald D. Acda 2.Edwin S. Malabanan 3.Donnald Marc Castillo

Program Bachelor of Science in Mechanical engineering Group No. 2
___________________________________________________________________________________
Point System Legend: 1 – Needs Significant Improvement; 2 – Needs improvement; 3 – Acceptable; 4 – Very Good; 5 – Excellent

Please check the appropriate points based assessment criteria. 1 2 3 4 5

1. Problem Definition: States the research problem/ objectives clearly, providing motivation
for undertaking the research.
2. Problem Identification: States the relation of the problem identified aligned to the
university’s research agenda
3. Technology Gap/ Opportunity Identification: Research study to possibly fill the gap
between the existing and the desired condition
4. Solution Identification: The research study is the possible solution for the problem
identified.
5. Local relevance of the solution: Application of the study intended to help the community
and others
6. Program Significant of the Solution: Relatively based on the field of practice
7. Quality of Oral Communications: Communicates clearly and professionally. Questions
directly and succinctly.
8. Critical Thinking: Demonstrates capability for independent research in the area of study.
Preparedness in core disciplines relevant to research, and ability to complete the research.
9. Format and Organization. Document is well-organized and logical. Guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.
10. Answers to questions. Demonstrate knowledge related to topic and research agenda.
Total Score : _______
Points Equivalent : _______
Notes:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

________ Does not pass/ Re-defense (24 points and below)

________ For reconsideration after major revisions (25 – 33 points)
________ Pass with Minor revisions (34 – 42 points)
________ Accepted in present Form (43 points & above)

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Panellist: ________________________________Signature: _______________________________Date:______________
 EVALUATION RUBRIC: RESEARCH STUDY TOPIC DEFENSE
Topic Temporary Evacuation Table Shelter during Earthquake: For UPHSD People Safety

Proponents 1.John Ronald D. Acda 2.Edwin Malabanan 3.Donald Marc Castillo

Program Bachelor of Science in Mechanical engineering Group No. 2
___________________________________________________________________________________
Point System Legend: 1 – Needs Significant Improvement; 2 – Needs improvement; 3 – Acceptable; 4 – Very Good; 5 – Excellent

Please check the appropriate points based assessment criteria. 1 2 3 4 5

1. Problem Definition: States the research problem/ objectives clearly, providing motivation
for undertaking the research.
2. Problem Identification: States the relation of the problem identified aligned to the
university’s research agenda
3. Technology Gap/ Opportunity Identification: Research study to possibly fill the gap
between the existing and the desired condition
4. Solution Identification: The research study is the possible solution for the problem
identified.
5. Local relevance of the solution: Application of the study intended to help the community
and others
6. Program Significant of the Solution: Relatively based on the field of practice
7. Quality of Oral Communications: Communicates clearly and professionally. Questions
directly and succinctly.
8. Critical Thinking: Demonstrates capability for independent research in the area of study.
Preparedness in core disciplines relevant to research, and ability to complete the research.
9. Format and Organization. Document is well-organized and logical. Guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.
10. Answers to questions. Demonstrate knowledge related to topic and research agenda.
Total Score : _______
Points Equivalent : _______
Notes:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

________ Does not pass/ Re-defense (24 points and below)

________ For reconsideration after major revisions (25 – 33 points)
________ Pass with Minor revisions (34 – 42 points)
________ Accepted in present Form (43 points & above)

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Panellist: ________________________________Signature: _______________________________Date:______________
 EVALUATION RUBRIC: RESEARCH STUDY TOPIC DEFENSE
Topic Design of a Table saw cutting machine for wood with automatic braking
system

Proponents 1.John Ronald D. Acda 2.Edwin S. Malabanan 3.Donnald Marc Castillo

Program Bachelor of Science in Mechanical engineering Group No. 2
___________________________________________________________________________________
Point System Legend: 1 – Needs Significant Improvement; 2 – Needs improvement; 3 – Acceptable; 4 – Very Good; 5 – Excellent

Please check the appropriate points based assessment criteria. 1 2 3 4 5

1. Problem Definition: States the research problem/ objectives clearly, providing motivation
for undertaking the research.
2. Problem Identification: States the relation of the problem identified aligned to the
university’s research agenda
3. Technology Gap/ Opportunity Identification: Research study to possibly fill the gap
between the existing and the desired condition
4. Solution Identification: The research study is the possible solution for the problem
identified.
5. Local relevance of the solution: Application of the study intended to help the community
and others
6. Program Significant of the Solution: Relatively based on the field of practice
7. Quality of Oral Communications: Communicates clearly and professionally. Questions
directly and succinctly.
8. Critical Thinking: Demonstrates capability for independent research in the area of study.
Preparedness in core disciplines relevant to research, and ability to complete the research.
9. Format and Organization. Document is well-organized and logical. Guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.
10. Answers to questions. Demonstrate knowledge related to topic and research agenda.
Total Score : _______
Points Equivalent : _______
Notes:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

________ Does not pass/ Re-defense (24 points and below)

________ For reconsideration after major revisions (25 – 33 points)
________ Pass with Minor revisions (34 – 42 points)
________ Accepted in present Form (43 points & above)

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Panellist: ________________________________Signature: _______________________________Date:______________