Part 4 - Site Preference

Sections 1 - 6
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Receiving Terminal and
Associated Facilities
EIA Study (EIA Study Brief ESB-126/2005)

EIA Report
Part 4 - Site Preference
Sections 1 - 6
nd
22 December 2006

Environmental Resources Management

21/F Lincoln House
Taikoo Place 979 King's Road
Island East Hong Kong
Telephone 2271 3000
Facsimile 2723 5660

www.erm.com
EIA REPORT : PART 4 - SITE PREFERENCE

nd
22 December 2006

nd
22 December 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION 1

2 ENVIRONMENTAL SUBJECTS CONSIDERED UNDER THE STUDY

BRIEF 2

2.1 BACKGROUND 2
2.2 THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2
2.3 THE OPERATION PHASE 7

3 MEETING THE HONG KONG SAR GOVERNMENT’S POLICY

OBJECTIVES 9

3.1 THE PEARL RIVER DELTA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 9

3.2 RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF THE TWO OPTIONS 9

4 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS 12

5 SITE PREFERENCE CONCLUSION 13

6 OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL BENEFITS TO

THE COMMUNITY 14
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

1 INTRODUCTION

This section of the EIA Report considers the relative merits of the Black Point
and South Soko Island options for the development of a Liquefied Natural Gas
(LNG) Receiving Terminal (the Project). The section draws from both the
extensive analysis of the environmental subjects documented in Parts 2 and 3
of the EIA Report and additional considerations which are presented in Part 1.

Consideration of the options has been undertaken with regards to the

following:

• environmental aspects as defined by the LNG terminal EIA Study Brief

(ESB-126/2005) issued by the Environmental Protection Department;

• the Hong Kong SAR Government’s policy objectives with regard to the
use of natural gas and the timetable for atmospheric emissions reduction;
and

• engineering and cost considerations.

While the focus of this section of the report is on the relative merits of the two
sites it should be noted that a thorough analysis of the need for the Project and
a wide range of gas delivery and siting options has been provided in Part 1.
The options considered included:

• import gas via pipeline from a nearby field;

• importing natural gas via the Guangdong Dapeng LNG terminal;

• import natural gas via a proposed LNG terminal in Mainland China;

• import LNG via a new terminal in Hong Kong;

• no action or defer decision.

Table 2.3 of Part 1 presents a summary of the comparison of these alternatives.

Having concluded that the preferred option is for the development of a LNG
terminal in Hong Kong, Section 4 of Part 1 describes the process by which the
Black Point and South Soko Island sites were short-listed for further analysis
in the EIA Study.

For each of the two sites, a number of alternative layouts, design options and
construction methods have been considered to ensure that environmental
impacts are avoided and, where unavoidable, are reduced to the maximum
extent practicable.

1
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

2 ENVIRONMENTAL SUBJECTS CONSIDERED UNDER THE STUDY BRIEF

2.1 BACKGROUND

The Study Brief requires the conduct of a comprehensive range of technical

studies, the findings of which are presented in detail in Parts 2 and 3 for the
South Soko Island and Black Point sites, respectively. A summary of the
findings for the technical assessments is presented in Table 2.1.

In liaison with Government and non government stakeholders, CAPCO then

undertook an Environmental Impact Assessment of both sites, consistent with
the Study Brief issued by the Hong Kong Government under the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) and following the Technical
Memorandum of the Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM).

It should be noted that the technical assessments were undertaken using

conservative or worst case assumptions and hence there is a high degree of
certainty that the full extent of potential impacts has been predicted and
provided for by mitigation measures where necessary, and that as a result,
none of the identified residual impacts are considered, following mitigation, to
be unacceptable as defined by the standards and criteria applied under the
EIAO. In some instances, additional measures have been incorporated into
aspects of the Project design and working methods to provide an additional
degree of confidence that any residual impacts do not breach the required
standards and is not expected to have long term environmental implications.

It is worth noting that whilst the Project would be the first LNG receiving
terminal to be developed in Hong Kong, the sources and characteristics of
potential impacts during construction and operation in the Hong Kong
context are not novel and are well understood. For example, there have been
several projects permitted under the EIAO which include the installation of
submarine gas pipelines and the development of reclamation sites. In
particular, these projects have included works within or close to Indo-pacific
Humpback Dolphin habitat, and long-term monitoring studies of these marine
mammals have found that population numbers have remained stable.

2.2 THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE

A wide range of issues was addressed in the construction phase impact

assessment and it was concluded that the Project would comply with the criteria
and standards defined in the EIAO-TM and its associated Annexes. The
principal environmental impacts associated with construction of the Project
arise from the excavation, dredging and reclamation works.

2
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

Table 2.1 Summary of the Key Findings of the Environmental Performance Comparison

ISSUE SOUTH SOKO

BLACK POINT
KEY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
• The result of the construction of the terminal at South Soko will be • The result of the construction of the terminal at Black Point will be the
the reduction in sea area by approximately 0.6 ha. reduction in sea area by approximately 16 ha.
WATER
• Maintenance dredging less than once every 10 years. • Maintenance dredging approximately once every 4 to 5 years.

• Need to dispose of 3.89 Mm3 of marine sediment. • Need to dispose of 3.15 Mm3 of marine sediment.
• Need to dispose of 179,000 m3 of excavation waste off site • 0 m3 of excavation waste (assuming all material accommodated within the
WASTE assuming 1.30 Mm3 is used to rock armour the submarine gas reclamation site)
pipeline.

• Permanent loss of approximately 7.3 ha of shrubland, 2.8 ha of • Permanent loss of approximately 4.2 ha of shrubland considered to be of
plantation, 0.5 ha of abandoned wet agricultural land, 1.8 ha of moderate ecological value and 1.0 ha of disturbed area
grassland and 5.3 ha of disturbed area. The affected areas are • Although the terrestrial ecology at Black Point is mainly dominated by
considered to be generally low quality habitats. 0.2 ha of medium moderate-low value shrubland/grass habitat typical of Hong Kong, it
TERRESTRIAL ecological value secondary woodland will also be lost. must be noted that the Project Area is relatively undisturbed with no
ECOLOGY • Many of the habitats on South Soko Island are highly modified significant human alterations.
and disturbed as a result of village developments up to the 1960s,
the construction of a Detention Centre in 1980s and its subsequent
demolition in the 1990s.

• Permanent loss of approximately 265 m of natural rocky • Permanent loss of approximately 600 m of natural rocky shore/intertidal
shore/natural subtidal habitat and approximately 35 m of sandy habitat which are of low ecological value. The residual impact is
shore which are of low to medium ecological value. The residual acceptable, as the loss will be compensated by the provision of approx. 1.1
MARINE ECOLOGY impact is considered to be acceptable, as the loss of these habitats km of sloping rubble mound/rock or concrete armour seawalls.
will be compensated by the provision of approximately 0.6 km of • Permanent loss of approximately 16 ha of subtidal soft bottom
sloping rubble mound/rock or concrete armour seawalls. assemblages within the reclamation sites. The residual impact is
• Permanent loss of approximately 0.6 ha of subtidal soft bottom acceptable as even though the size of habitat lost is relatively large it is of

3
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

ISSUE SOUTH SOKO

BLACK POINT
assemblages and marine waters within the reclamation site. The relatively low ecological value.
residual impact is acceptable as the habitat is of medium to low • Permanent loss of approximately 16 ha of marine waters within the
ecological value and supports low sightings of marine mammals.. reclamation sites. The residual impact is considered to be acceptable as
• Permanent loss of approximately 1.1 ha of coastal habitat as a the habitat forms only a small portion of the extensive home range of
result of seawall modifications. The residual impact is acceptable affected animals (typically over 100 km2) and is not expected to result in
as the habitat supports assemblages of low ecological value. long term biologically significant impacts on the population of marine
• Maintenance dredging of specific areas of the approach channel mammals in Hong Kong.
and turning basin is expected to be required once every 10 years. • Maintenance dredging of specific areas of the approach channel and
Although impact to water quality is expected to be compliant with turning basin is expected to be required once every 4 to 5 years. Although
current WQO standards, the works will result in occasional impact to water quality is expected to be compliant with current WQO
disturbance to the low to moderate ecological value habitat within standards, the works will result in relatively regular disturbance to the
the dredged areas. low ecological value habitat within the dredged areas.
• Short term and temporary impacts from the installation of the • No adverse residual ecological impacts have been identified. It must also
submarine gas pipeline, watermain and power cable. be noted that the marine environment around Black Point has been
• No adverse residual ecological impacts have been identified. The subject to disturbance in the past as a result of the reclamation at BPPS
marine environment around the South Soko Island has been and sand dredging.
subject to disturbance in the past as a result of the reclamations in
Sai Wan and Tung Wan. To the East of the South Soko island lies
the active South Cheung Chau Mid Disposal Ground and to the
West the now inactive but gazetted Sand Dredging and Mud
Disposal Area.

• Acceptable residual impact is loss of 0.6 ha of marine waters used • Residual impact is loss of 16 ha of fishing grounds. Considered
FISHERIES for small-scale fishing operations. acceptable despite relatively large size as production values are low.

• Land based viewing locations too far removed from the proposed • LNG terminal only visible from limited viewpoints, including visitors to
LNG terminal to be aware of the change in landscape. the remote island of Lung Kwu Chau in the Marine Park and the transient
• The principal visual change and impact on landscape character passengers on ferry routes.
LANDSCAPE & VISUAL
will be for those few viewers who visit the surrounding area and • Visitors to Lung Kwu Chau may experience a moderate to significant
particularly the ocean between South and North Soko. visual impact during clear days. However there are low user numbers to
• Land based VSRs will experience negligible to moderate adverse this area. The users of the ferry routes may experience a moderate visual

4
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

ISSUE SOUTH SOKO

BLACK POINT
impacts. impact.
• VSRs on South Soko and on waters around South Soko will • Potential glare and lighting impacts will be low due to the distances
experience significant adverse impacts. However, there are low between the site and viewers and careful lighting selection and
visitors numbers in this area, and no residents, to experience this placement.
impact. • Impact on the landscape character of Black Point headland is considered
• Potential glare and lighting impacts will be low due to the acceptable due to the low number of viewers that will experience this
distances between the site and careful lighting selection and impact and the adjacent industrial nature of the landscape.
placement.
• Impact on the landscape character of South Soko is considered
acceptable as relatively few visitors will experience this impact.

• Direct loss of archaeological deposits areas Sites A to E. Given the • Loss of two building structures at Terrace 1, a WWII cave at Terrace 2
construction of underground utilities making in-situ preservation and a stone structure at Terrace 3 of low cultural resource value.
impossible, as a last resort, an archaeological action plan has been • The loss is considered acceptable provided that a photographic and
recommended which is a separate document containing the cartographic recording is undertaken for the sites following AMO’s
detailed rescue excavation plan, archaeological monitoring plan requirements.
and contingency plan to preserve impacted archaeological
deposits by record.
• Impact on the Tai A Chau Tin Hau Temple, 21 graves and the
CULTURAL HERITAGE associated tablet and 7 earthshrines is expected. These sites will
be relocated with the provision of photographic and cartographic
records to preserve them by record prior to their removal. An
archaeological survey will be undertaken at the suitable relocation
site for the Tai A Chau Tin Hau Temple to confirm if any
archaeological deposits will be impacted at the relocation site. If
archaeological deposits are identified, appropriate mitigation
measures will be implemented to mitigate the impact.

5
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

ISSUE SOUTH SOKO

BLACK POINT
• The results of the Marine Quantitative Risk Assessment of the • The results of the Marine Quantitative Risk Assessment of the transit of
transit of the LNG carrier to South Soko indicated that individual the LNG carrier to Black Point indicated that individual risk is acceptable
and societal risk levels are acceptable within the HKSARG risk and the societal risk is as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) as set
guidelines presented in Annex 4 of the EIAO-TM. out in HKSARG risk guidelines presented in Annex 4 of the EIAO-TM.
• The results of the Terminal and Pipeline Quantitative Risk
Assessments of the LNG terminal at South Soko indicated that • The results of the Terminal Quantitative Risk Assessments of the LNG
individual and societal risk levels comply with the HKSARG risk terminal at Black Point indicated that individual and societal risk levels
HAZARD TO LIFE guidelines presented in Annex 4 of the EIAO-TM. comply with the HKSARG risk guidelines presented in Annex 4 of the
• The location of the South Soko Island provides for very low EIAO-TM.
numbers of surrounding land and marine-based populations with • Access to the Black Point site today requires marine transit through busy
exposure to both the terminal site and the marine transit. harbour traffic, and along densely populated areas, of:
- Western Hong Kong Island: Ap Lei Chau, Cyberport;
- Ma Wan Island and Tsing Ma Bridge;
- New Territories: Sham Tseng, Tsing Lung Tau, Gold Coast, Tuen
Mun.

6
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

The length of natural coastline lost due to the development at South Soko
Island is approximately 50% less than that associated with the development at
Black Point. Residual impacts to water quality, marine ecology and fisheries
as a consequence of the proposed marine construction works have been
assessed in considerable detail and are demonstrated to be acceptable for both
sites. Acceptability has been achieved by a combination of means, including
reducing the extent of marine habitat loss arising from reclamation works and
adopting dredging rates that are sensitive to the condition of the works area.
For example, through the integration of environmental considerations into the
design of the facility layout at South Soko Island, the overall reclamation area
has been reduced from approximately 13 ha to 0.6 ha. Permanent loss of
approximately 1.1 ha of coastal habitat will occur as a result of seawall
modifications.

For the other construction phase impacts, such as noise and air quality, the
principal factor that differentiates the two sites is their distance from sensitive
receivers. The Black Point site is approximately 2 km from the closest
residential sensitive receiver, whereas the South Soko Island site is over 6 km
distant.

2.3 THE OPERATION PHASE

A wide range of issues have been addressed in an assessment of the operation

phase of the Project including the assessment of impacts on the environment(1)
and hazard to life associated with the operation of the LNG Terminal. The
Project was judged against the criteria and standards defined in the EIAO-TM
and its associated Annexes.

As required by the Study Brief, the hazard to life assessment consisted of a

very thorough and detailed analysis. The Study Brief and EIAO-TM
guidelines include both the consideration of societal and individual risks and
Hong Kong’s standards are amongst the most stringent in the world. In
addition to consideration of the terminal itself, and in the case of the South
Soko Island option, the associated submarine pipeline, the assessments have
included an analysis of risks associated with the LNG carrier transit by
purpose-built LNG carriers in Hong Kong waters, ie the Marine Quantitative
Risk Assessment.

For each of the components assessed in the South Soko EIA Report, the
assessments and the residual impacts have all been shown to be acceptable
within the relevant standards/criteria of the EIAO-TM and the associated
Annexes.

(1 ) In this context, “environmental perspective” refers to environmental performance comparison parameters of, Air,
Noise, Water, Waste, Terrestrial Ecology, Marine Ecology, Fisheries, Landscape and Visual, and Cultural Heritage.

7
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

The assessment has evaluated the hazards to life associated with the LNG
terminal as well as the marine transit of LNG. Based on the risk criteria set
out in Annex 4 of the EIAO-TM, the assessment has concluded that the
individual risk for the marine transit and the LNG terminal are acceptable.
However, the societal risk of the marine transit to Black Point is As Low As
reasonably Practicable (ALARP) (1) for some areas of the marine transit; the
difference in risk for these areas is due to busy marine traffic and high
population density particularly through the Ma Wan channel.

Measures to mitigate the marine societal risk through these areas from ALARP
to Acceptable are not considered to be implementable at this time by the
relevant Authority due to their impact on other marine traffic in the busy
Hong Kong environment. LNG transit through these areas is avoided by the
selection of the South Soko site, where the risk of the marine transit has been
assessed as Acceptable along the entire route.

One of the principal differences between the South Soko Island site and the
site at Black Point and their associated LNG carrier transit routes is their
proximity to land and marine-based populations. The location of the South
Soko Island provides for very low numbers of surrounding land and marine-
based populations with exposure to both the terminal site and the marine
transit (Figure 2.1). Access to the Black Point site today requires marine transit
through busy harbour traffic, and along densely populated areas, of:

• Western Hong Kong Island: Ap Lei Chau, Cyberport;

• Ma Wan Island and Tsing Ma Bridge;

• New Territories: Sham Tseng, Tsing Lung Tau, Gold Coast, Tuen Mun.

(1 ) Under Hong Kong EIAO-TM guidelines, there are three regions of risk categorisation: "Acceptable" requires no
further action; risk within "ALARP" should be mitigated to as low as reasonably practicable; and, "Unacceptable"
cannot be permitted.

8
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

3 MEETING THE HONG KONG SAR GOVERNMENT’S POLICY OBJECTIVES

3.1 THE PEARL RIVER DELTA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Reducing atmospheric emissions and improving air quality is a major policy

objective for the Hong Kong SAR Government and for the Guangdong
Provincial Government. In December 2003, the two governments jointly drew
up the Pearl River Delta Regional Air Quality Management Plan (the
"Management Plan") with a view to meeting an agreed set of emission
reduction targets. The control of emissions from the power generation
industry is a central component of this policy.

The Hong Kong SAR Government’s environmental policy includes the control
of emissions from the existing power stations in Hong Kong. Central to this
effort is the use of natural gas. The recognition of the role of natural gas in
emissions control was affirmed by the Hong Kong SAR Government in the
2005-06 Policy Address (1):

“61. To fully achieve the emissions reduction targets in 2010, we have

asked the power companies to … use natural gas for power generation as
much as possible.

The provision of natural gas for the purposes of power generation is

consistent with the Hong Kong SAR Government’s policy and is widely
supported by the community.

3.2 RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF THE TWO OPTIONS

The time required to bring a LNG receiving terminal into operation differs
between the two sites.

3.2.1 South Soko Island

It is estimated that the LNG terminal, if constructed at the South Soko Island
site, can be brought on-line and deliver first gas 12 to 18 months earlier than
one located at the Black Point site. This is due to a shorter construction
schedule and permitting and zoning processes.

For the South Soko location, once access to the site is granted through a Short
Term Tenancy agreement, construction work could begin consisting of:

• 10 months of excavation and site preparation activity, followed by;

• 30 months of tank and plant construction, followed by;
• 2 months of cool-down and commissioning activities.

(1) The 2005-06 Policy Address, Strong Governance for the People, Paragraph 61.

9
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

The pipeline construction and a small amount of reclamation activity would

be performed concurrently with tank and facility construction upon
completion of Foreshore and Seabed (Reclamations) Ordinance (FSRO) process.

Site preparation and construction is able to commence relatively quickly

because (a) the large flat area, (the former Detention Centre site) and (b) the
existing dock enable mobilization activities to commence immediately and
facilitate delivery of personnel and materials.

Based on the above activities, a LNG terminal at South Soko requires

approximately 42 months from initial site access to first delivery of gas.

3.2.2 Black Point

For the Black Point site, initial site access is more difficult than at South Soko,
as there is no usable, flat work area until one is formed through excavation
and reclamation. Once access to the site is granted through a Short Term
Tenancy agreement, site formation could begin consisting of

• 15 months of excavation;

• Up to 6 months potential delays in completion of Foreshore and Seabed

(Reclamations) Ordinance (FSRO) gazettal process

• once the FSRO gazettal is approved the follow on construction would

consist of:

5 months of seawall construction (for the reclaimed area) and the initial phases
of reclamation to enable tank construction to start, followed by (1) ;

- 32 months of tank and plant construction, followed by;

- 2 months of cool-down and commissioning activities.

Reclamation activity of approximately 12 months duration would be

performed simultaneously with tank construction and prior to plant area
construction.

Based on the above activities, a LNG terminal at Black Point requires

approximately 54 – 60 months from initial site access to first delivery of gas.

The prompt provision of a new gas supply is a matter of the utmost

importance due to the earlier than planned depletion of the reserves at the
Yacheng gas field. In addition to ensuring continuity in the reliability of
power supply to the SAR, the South Soko option allows an earlier replacement
of natural gas supply and can provide flexibility for higher gas off-take
depending on certainty of remaining Yacheng gas availability which would
result in CAPCO bringing less coal and avoiding associated emissions.

(1 ) The adoption of measures to control impacts to dolphins may require avoidance of certain seasons for some
marine works. This could introduce an additional 2 1/2 year delay to the programme.

10
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

The principal environmental benefit of the South Soko option is the reduction
in emissions of oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and sulphur dioxide.
Adopting the South Soko Island site will avoid additional emissions of these
three groups of pollutants for a period of up to 18 months.

In the context of the Hong Kong SAR Government’s policy objectives for
emissions reduction, the South Soko Island option enables an earlier gas
supply replacement and corresponding environmental benefits when
compared to the Black Point site.

11
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

4 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS

The key components of a LNG receiving terminal include:

• marine jetty facilities for unloading LNG;

• full containment tanks for LNG storage;
• process equipment for the regasification of LNG; and
• utilities and associated infrastructure.

These components are common to both options. The principal difference

between the components for the two options is the requirement for a
submarine gas pipeline for the South Soko Island option.

There are also a number of differences associated with the civil engineering
and site formation work, as presented in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 Key Design Parameters

South Soko Island Black Point

Overall project area 36.5 ha, mainly where the former 32 ha on the headland south of
Detention Centre and its facilities the Black Point Power Station
were located
Permanent Land-based 18.5 ha 5 ha
works areas
Reclamation areas 0.6 ha 16 ha
Seawall modifications 1.1 ha 0 ha
Dredging volume 3.89 Mm3 3.15 Mm3

The South Soko Island site requires considerably less reclamation work than
the Black Point site, ie 0.6 ha versus 16 ha. The larger reclamation works
required at Black Point result in a site development schedule that is around six
months longer than for the South Soko site.

12
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

5 SITE PREFERENCE CONCLUSION

The preferred site for the LNG terminal has been identified after undertaking
extensive studies and investigation works. A comprehensive Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) of the South Soko Island and Black Point options has
been conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Study Brief and
EIAO-TM. The EIA Study has been conducted in parallel with wide-ranging
engineering studies, marine resource assessments and a suite of site
investigation works.

Taking into consideration the range of factors described in the previous

sections, the South Soko Island site is preferred. The principal differentiators
between this site and the Black Point option are as follows:

• Earlier replacement gas supply: South Soko will enable a replacement

gas supply 12 to 18 months earlier than the Black Point option;

• Gas offtake: South Soko allows an earlier replacement of natural gas

supply and can provide flexibility for higher gas off-take depending on
certainty of remaining Yacheng gas availability which would result in
CAPCO burning less coal, and avoiding the associated emissions;

• Meeting the Hong Kong SAR Government’s policy objectives for

emissions reduction: South Soko enables CAPCO to meet the Hong
Kong SAR Government’s emission targets sooner than the Black Point
option;

• Reducing reclamation works: South Soko requires less land reclamation,

while its offshore pipeline to Black Point results in only temporary
environmental impacts of short duration.

• Marine transit: The location of South Soko provides for very low
numbers of surrounding land and marine-based populations with
exposure to both the terminal and the marine transit.

13
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

6 OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL BENEFITS TO THE

COMMUNITY

CAPCO believes that siting the LNG terminal on South Soko Island provides
an opportunity to enhance the island's marine and terrestrial environments
for the benefit of the community and would support a Soko Islands and
Southwest Lantau Marine Park. By assisting government through the
provision of initial funding for education and research to support the
establishment of the Parks, CAPCO believes it can create the necessary
stimulus to bring this conservation area to fruition.

The enhancements envisaged are not intended to address or mitigate the

potential impacts of the LNG terminal on South Soko Island as such will be
addressed through specific construction practices, mitigation measures and
monitoring programs. Rather, the enhancements envisaged are similar to
recent local and overseas experience whereby industrial facilitates and
conservation areas co-exist within the same area 1,2.

With input from a range of stakeholders including Government, NGOs, local

community groups and fishing interests, CAPCO proposes that an
Enhancement Plan be developed. This Plan will contain various components
as described below and draw on local marine conservation programmes
enhanced by overseas experience in the establishment of marine parks and
conservation areas. In this regard, CAPCO has commissioned detailed and
extensive marine studies as part of its EIA process, obtaining expert views
from well known and highly respected specialists in marine conservation.
CAPCO will provide access to those studies as part of any Enhancement Plan.

CAPCO has identified the following key possible enhancements through its
discussions with stakeholders and experts:

• Marine Conservation: CAPCO understands that the waters around the

Soko Islands and Southwest Lantau have the potential to be zoned for the
purposes of marine conservation. As discussed in the introduction to this
section, CAPCO is prepared, as a stakeholder, to assist government in
funding a portion of the initial cost of establishing such a marine
conservation area. CAPCO envisages supporting the Authority to
consider and decide on the optimal size of and the objectives for the
marine conservation area. During and after construction of the LNG
terminal, CAPCO will carry out line transect surveys of dolphins and
finless porpoises and acoustic studies surveys as part of census and
behavioural investigations. These surveys and investigations will assist
in ongoing marine conservation efforts and information gathering in
respect of these mammals. CAPCO will also undertake studies into the
population biology of amphioxus. These surveys will follow accepted
protocols for pre, during and post construction phases of the project. The
aforementioned behavioural and biological studies would form part of
CAPCO’s scientific support for the marine park programme.

14
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES PART 4 – SITE PREFERENCE

• Rehabilitation of Marine Environments: CAPCO’s experts have advised

that artificial reefs could be deployed in the area to the west of the North
Soko Island formerly used as a sand dredging and marine borrow area, to
aid its rehabilitation and encourage fisheries production. CAPCO would
fund a study to confirm the suitability of the artificial reef programme
and, subject to the results of this study, provide assistance in funding the
establishment of the artificial reef proposal.

• Cultural Heritage: A portion of the South Soko Island is known to be of

archaeological interest. As part of the LNG terminal project, CAPCO will
conduct a rescue excavation of artefacts disturbed by the proposed
facility. While specific implementation plans remain to be defined,
CAPCO is committed to provide assistance to AMO for placing these
artefacts on public display at a suitable location.

• Public Access: In order to maintain and improve access for grave

visitation, and for fishermen and recreational users of South Soko Island,
CAPCO will provide a new public pier and will support programs to
maintain the public areas and amenities in a clean and tidy condition.
The LNG facility will also bring potable water to South Soko.

• Education: CAPCO is willing to potentially support education efforts

focusing on cultural heritage, marine and terrestrial ecology conservation
at and around the Soko Islands. Such efforts could include the production
of educational materials that relate to the marine conservation areas of
Fan Lau and Soko Islands as well as the benefits of clean energy.

• Recreation: Recreational use of the Island will be enhanced by the

provision of improved public access with the incorporation of rest areas,
view points, and bird watching areas near the existing freshwater
reservoir.

Figure 6.1 illustrates some of the key attributes of an indicative Enhancement

Plan at South Soko Island and Southwest Lantau.

CAPCO is committed to working with the Country Marine Parks Authority,

other relevant Government departments and other stakeholders to formulate
and then agree, after the EIA process has been completed, on the most
appropriate means, funding and time of implementation of an Enhancement
Plan for South Soko Island and Southwest Lantau.

(1) AAHK's Aviation Fuel Receiving Facility located in the Lung Kwu Chau and Sha Chau Marine Park,
HK
(2) Dominion Cove Point Liquid Natural Gas, LP's LNG terminal operated within the Cove Point Natural
Heritage Trust, Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA

15
0018180_EIA_PART_4_TEXT_V27.DOC 11 DEC 2006
 South West
Marine Park
Lantau
at Fan Lau
Marine Park

Rehabilitation - Marine Systems

North
Soko

Soko Islands Possible artificial reefs to enhance fish

abundance and diversity
Marine Park

Marine Conservation Biodiversity

Explore designation as a
Marine Park utilising data
collected during the EIA to
re-define boundaries
considering operational South
requirements and marine
conservation objectives
Soko Line transect surveys and behavioural
investigations for marine mammals

Legend Landscape Architecture

Existing Reservoir
SOUTH SOKO
& Urban Design
Pier & Relocated Natural Heritage
Tin Hau Temple Displays 21 / F Lincoln House

Fig 6.1 Indicative

979 Kings Road

Heritage Previously Proposed Taikoo Place

Island East, Hong Kong
Eco Trail Marine Park
Trail
Project No. 0018180

Enhancement Plan 1 of 2 June 2006

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT LTD
Public Access Cultural Heritage - Display

South
Existing Pier Potential Pier
Soko
Image from ‘Quarterly Bulletin of the Antiquities and
Monuments Office, Vol 4 No. 2’
Access will be maintained through a
replacement to the existing pier Establish a display of recovered artefacts

Education Recreation

Legend
Pier & Relocated Natural Heritage Existing Reservoir
Tin Hau Temple Displays
Provide facilities to support education Heritage Eco Trail
efforts on marine and terrestrial ecology Trail Opportunities for outdoor recreation
and cultural heritage features of Island

Landscape Architecture

SOUTH SOKO
& Urban Design

21 / F Lincoln House

Fig 6.1 Indicative

979 Kings Road
Taikoo Place
Island East, Hong Kong

Project No. 0018180

Enhancement Plan 2 of 2 June 2006

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT LTD