IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

A CASE STUDY ON CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLID WASTE &

LEACHATE TREATMENT OF OKHLA LANDFILL-NEW DELHI

Sunita Bansal1, Srijit Biswas2

1
Associate Professor, Deptt. of Civil Engg., FET, Manav Rachna International University, Faridabad, India
2
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg, FET, Manav Rachna International University, Faridabad, India

Abstract
Delhi is the most densely populated and urbanized city of India. The annual growth rate in population during the last decade was
almost double the national average. Delhi is also a commercial hub, providing employment opportunities and accelerating the
pace of urbanization, resulting in a corresponding increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation. Presently Delhi
generating about 6500 tonnes/day of MSW out of which only 70-75% wastes are able to collect by the MSW management
authority and rest amount of wastes are not possible to collect for the habit of people to thrown the wastes in empty places. At
present three main landfill sites of Delhi are Bhalaswa at north Delhi, Ghazipur at east Delhi, and Okhla at south Delhi. But not a
single landfill are sanitary landfill rather wastes are dumping crudely as a heap of wastes in open landfill. As a result the leachate
generated due to percolation of rain water and squeezing of wastes itself posing a great threat in the surrounding soil structure of
the landfill. Around the periphery of landfill, soils gets highly contaminated and toxic and degraded it’s essential nutrients [4,6].
In this paper a case study on characteristics of solid wastes of Okhla landfill and performance of it’s leachate treatment is carried
out for future planning and proper management of soil structure around the periphery of landfill site.

Keywords: BOD, COD, E-coli, leachate, solid waste, TDS, etc

--------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------

1. INTRODUCTION
Solid wastes are generated due to human as well as
industrial activities and discarded directly or indirectly after
it’s full utilisation. Any wastes other than human excreta,
urine & waste water is called solid wastes. The process of
collection, transportation, treatment, and disposal can be
grouped under solid waste management. Most of the landfill
are being used only for ultimate disposal of municipal waste
without any environmental protection [1,3]. When moisture
exceeds the field capacity of the waste matrix as a result of
percolation of rain water it squeezing the waste itself and
form leachate. It contains a wide variety of hazardous
chemicals and when transmitted around it’s soil structure it
degrades the quality of original soil [2]. To minimize these
problems a composting plant is working in Okhla landfill
and now it is the biggest solid waste management plant
working in Delhi. After collection of total wastes, all the
inorganic materials are discarded to landfill directly and
only the biodegradable wastes are shifted to composting
plant for generation of electricity. The waste is burnt
sequence wise and an ash is collected to dump at landfill.
Out of total quantity of wastes, only 20% of it are possible
to transfer to composting plant daily. Thus major quantity of
wastes is ultimately dumping into the landfill crudely. But
Okhla landfill is not a sanitary landfill rather 100% crude
dumping type landfill. Thus leachate produced from the
wastes percolate towards downward direction as well as
moves towards horizontally too openly.

Fig 1: Open leachate movement around the periphery of

Okhla landfill

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 175
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

At present there is no facility available to MSW

management authority of Delhi to give proper protection of
leachate flow or have any technology for it’s treatment
before coming in touch with open soil. Thus to protect the
soil from anticipated toxicity of leachate, a vigorous case
study on the characteristics of solid wastes and it’s leachate
is very essential. In this paper, light is beamed on the
severity of degradation of the existing soil structure around
the periphery of Okhla landfill site and analyze the
performance of leachate treatment by different technological
options [5].

2. METHODOLOGY
The proposed methodology includes two main phases, one is
the analysis of solid wastes characteristics and second is
leachate characteristics with it’s treatment by physico-
chemical process. In below both phases of study are briefly
discussed for better understanding the present scenario of
soil degradation of Okhla landfill.
Fig-2: Segregation of solid wastes collected from different
2.1 Analysis of Solid Waste Characteristics vehicles
A solid waste samples represent the average quality of waste
with average amount of it’s different constituents of the 2.2 Analysis and Treatment of Leachate
waste collected from all sources under it’s jurisdiction. To In the second phase, characteristics of leachate and it’s
collect all these wastes from different locations, nos. of treatment are studied considering two environmental
vehicles are working daily under Delhi MSW management conditions i.e without rainfall condition and with rainfall
authority. In this phase of case study approximate 30-40 kg condition. In both cases of conditions two different samples
of waste is collected from a vehicle of each location as a are collected, one is directly from landfill site and another s
source of waste sample of that locality of Delhi and then is generated in the laboratory.
mixed all the samples thoroughly. For simplicity in
assessment the average percentages of each component of
2.2.1 Sample Collection from Landfill Site
wastes, 100 kg of mixed wastes are taken for segregation.
All segregated components are then measured individually At present there is no systematic mechanism available for
by ordinary owing machine available in the local market leachate collection in Okhla landfill rather it is coming drop
and all the data are noted for further course of analysis. by drop from bottom of the heap. For the sample of without
rainfall condition, initially ten samples are collected
separately from ten different locations around the periphery
of landfill by a 2” PVC pipe channel and then mixed all
these samples into a big jar. For the case of with rainfall
condition, sample is collected from the landfill just after the
day of heavy rainfall in the landfill site.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 176
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

Fig-3 : Process of leachate collection

2.2.2 Sample Generated in the Laboratory

From the mixed wastes as discussed in section-2.1, roughly 100 kg of solid wastes is collected for generation of leachate samples
in the laboratory. Out of this 100 kg, 50% of solid wastes are kept in a closed container for formation of leachate by anaerobic
decomposition and rest 50% of wastes are kept in an open container with a provision of artificial rainfall from top and lower
portion is for storage of leachate.

2.2.3 Leachate Treatment

In this section the leachate treatment has been studied by two different methods, one is physico-chemical treatment using lime &
alum and second is physico-chemical with anaerobic biological treatment. In biological treatment samples are dilute by water
in1:1 ratio before adding of chemicals. Dosing applied in physico-chemical treatment are 100mg/l, 150mg/l, 200mg/l, 250mg/l,
and 300mg/l followed by 1-minute rapid mixing and 5-minutes slow mixing time with detention period of 2-hours for each. In
physico-chemical with anaerobic biological treatment, dosing are applied same with same rapid mixing and slow mixing time but
detention time are kept as 5-days instead of 2hrs. The flow diagram of physico-chemical with anaerobic biological treatment is
shown below:

For the simplicity in laboratory experiments, following parameters are considered for all leachate samples: pH , BOD3 (27 0C),
COD, TKN, TS, SS, DS, E Coli.

3. CASE STUDY
Okhla landfill is purely a open and crude dumping landfill and has no barricade around it’s periphery to protect the leachates
movement. Thus collection of leachate sample is not a great problem from the bottom of it’s heap. The first phase of the case
study is conducted continuously for eight days. Every day, about 30-40 kg of wastes are collected from different 15 vehicles as a
source of wastes of 15 different locations of New Delhi. There after 100 kg of mixed wastes from these 15 samples are taken into
consideration for analysis daily. All these analysis data are tabulated in table-1 for further calculation of average typical
composition of solid waste of landfill in table-2. A graphical analysis (Graph-1) is also presented to compare the variation of each
component of wastes of Okhla landfill.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 177
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

Table-1: Analysis the Composition of Solid Wastes of Okhla landfill

Compositi % by mass of weight

on of On On On On On On Average
waste 10.09.1 12.09.1 On 24.09.1 On 02.10.1 04.10.1 12.10.1
4 4 19.09.14 4 29.09.14 4 4 4
Food 35.30 27.60 38.15 12.50 19.75 25.25 28.65 16.85 25.506
waste
Paper 12.35 11.20 8.40 10.50 6.85 7.45 9.25 10.35 9.544
Plastic 7.00 10.00 6.25 8.55 11.25 5.50 6.25 3.55 7.294
Garden 9.50 7.20 11.50 9.00 15.15 10.50 12.40 19.10 11.794
wastes
Wood 1.20 0.60 2.10 0.50 0.35 1.25 0.75 0.65 0.925
Rubber 0.25 0.10 1.40 0.60 0.15 1.35 0.15 1.15 0.644
Leather 0.25 0.15 0.50 0.55 1.35 0.65 0.85 0.60 0.613
Glass 0.50 0.65 2.25 1.45 0.55 0.85 3.25 2.10 1.450
Tin cans 3.45 2.20 1.50 6.25 2.30 4.50 1.75 2.50 3.056
Demolitio 11.70 24.30 6.10 16.30 23.40 27.45 15.50 16.00 17.594
n wastes
Textile 2.00 1.90 0.75 2.80 1.75 1.20 5.35 1.40 2.144
Ferrous 1.20 2.00 0.50 1.50 2.80 0.65 1.30 1.90 1.481
materials
Special 14.50 11.70 19.50 28.75 12.45 13.25 10.90 23.35 16.800
waste*
Other 0.80 0.40 1.10 0.75 1.90 0.15 3.65 0.50 1.16
misc.
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100.00

* Wastes from street sweeping, road side litters, catch basin debris, dead animals etc.

Table-2: Average Typical Composition of Solid Waste of Okhla Landfill

Average % by
Composition of Waste mass of weight
Food wastes 25.506 Biodegradable
Paper 9.544 Biodegradable
Total Biodegradable
Plastic 7.294 Non-Biodegradable
Wastes = 58.464 %
Garden Trimmining 11.794 Biodegradable
Wood 0.925 Biodegradable
Rubber 0.644 Biodegradable Total Non-
Leather 0.613 Biodegradable Biodegradable Wastes =
Glass 1.450 Non-Biodegradable 41.536 %
Tin cans 3.056 Non-Biodegradable
Demolition wastes 17.594 Non-Biodegradable
Textile 2.144 Biodegradable
Ferrous materials 1.481 Non-Biodegradable
Special waste* 16.800 Non-Biodegradable
Other misc. 1.16 Non-Biodegradable
Total 100.00

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 178
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

Graph-1: Comparison of all Components of Wastes of Okhla Landfill

The second phase is studied for the analysis leachate BOD3

characteristics and it’s treatment for the following four ratio = 0.375
catagories of samples: COD
 Leachate sample directly from the landfill site TKN 180 mg/l
without rainfall condition TS 19220 mg/l
 Leachate sample collected directly from the landfill SS 57 mg/l
site with rainfall condition DS 19,163 mg/l
 Leachate sample generated in laboratory without Total Coliform (E-coli) 3.6 x 105 / 100 ml
rainfall condition
 Leachate sample generated in laboratory with Table-4: COD-Removal after Alum Treatment
rainfall condition Alum – pH COD %
dosing mg/l removal
To generate the leachate sample in laboratory with rainfall mg/l
condition, the artificial rainfall are maintained as under: 100 7.41 16,200 6.36
200 7.38 15,500 10.40
Date Rainfall in mm/hr. 250 7.35 15100 12.72
12-10.2014 35 300 7.33 14600 15.61
28-10-2014 20 350 7.31 13800 20.23
02-11-2014 10
14-11-2014 12 Table-5: COD-Removal after Lime Treatment
22-11-2014 8 Lime – pH COD mg/l % removal
dosing mg/l
Now the job is to do the laboratory test results of all 100 7.47 16900 2.31
category of leachate samples along with it’s treatment 200 7.58 16300 5.78
followed by two different technology. 250 7.66 15800 8.67
300 7.79 15200 12.14
In the first case of job, all laboratory test results of leachate 350 7.83 14800 14.45
samples collected directly from landfill site (without rainfall
condition) are tabulated below : Table-6: COD-Removal after Lime - Alum Treatment
Lime – Alum – pH COD %
Table-3: Characteristics of raw leachate dosing dosing mg/l removal
Parameters Value mg/l mg/l
pH 7.47 mg/l 100 100 7.43 15,100 12.72
BOD3 (27 0C) 6500 mg/l 200 200 7.49 14,700 15.03
COD 17300 mg/l 250 250 7.52 13900 19.65
300 300 7.56 13200 23.70
350 350 7.58 12800 26.01
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 179
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

Table-7: COD-Removal after Lime - Alum with Biological Table-11: COD – removal after Lime Treatment
Treatment Lime – pH COD mg/l % removal
Lime – Alum – pH COD % dosing mg/l
dosing dosing mg/l removal 100 7.61 305 4.68
mg/l mg/l 150 7.69 292 8.75
100 100 7.43 12,300 28.90 175 7.76 287 10.31
200 200 7.49 11,900 31.21 200 7.88 282 11.88
250 250 7.52 11400 34.10
300 300 7.56 10800 37.57 Table-12: COD – removal after Lime – Alum Treatment
350 350 7.58 10600 38.73 Lime – Alum – pH COD %
dosing dosing mg/l removal
As a second case of job, laboratory test result of leachate mg/l mg/l
sample generated in laboratory (without rainfall condition) 100 100 7.55 245 23.43
is tabulated below: 150 150 7.57 220 31.25
175 175 7.68 160 50.00
Table-8 : Characteristics for raw leachates 200 200 7.74 93 70.94
Parameters Value
pH 8.30 mg/l Table-13: COD-Removal after Lime - Alum with
BOD3 (27 0C) 1135 mg/l Biological Treatment
COD 4432 mg/l Lime – Alum – pH COD %
dosing dosing mg/l removal
mg/l mg/l
BOD3
ratio = 0.256 100 100 7.53 227 29.06
COD 150 150 7.55 196 38.75
TKN 26 mg/l 175 175 7.61 132 58.75
TS 2535 mg/l 200 200 7.69 51 84.06
SS 72 mg/l
DS 2463 mg/l Last data is for the sample generated in laboratory (with
E-coli 3.6 x 105 / 100 ml rainfall condition) given below :

In the third case of job, all laboratory test results of leachate Table-14: Characteristics for raw leachates
samples collected directly from landfill site (with rainfall Parameters Value
condition) are tabulated below : pH 7.31 mg/l
BOD3 (27 0C) 56 mg/l
Table-9: Characteristics for raw leachates COD 218 mg/l
Parameters Value BOD3
pH 7.48 mg/l ratio = 0.193
BOD3 (27 0C) 62 mg/l COD
COD 320 mg/l TKN 9.5 mg/l
TS 5238 mg/l
BOD3
ratio = 0.193 SS 998 mg/l
COD DS 4240 mg/l
TKN 11.3 mg/l E-coli 3.6 x 105 / 100 ml
TS 6021 mg/l
SS 895 mg/l 4. DISCUSSION ON EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
DS 5126 mg/l
E-coli 3.6 x 105 / 100 ml The percentage wise components of solid waste of Okha
landfill varied widely from one to one and ‘Food Wastes’
Table-10: COD – removal after Alum Treatment only itself contributes highest 25.506% of the total wastes of
the landfill. The components ‘Demolition wastes’ &
Alum – pH COD mg/l % removal
‘Special waste’ are 17.594% and 16.80% respectively and
dosing mg/l
stood the next to food wastes accordingly. The minimum %
100 7.44 275 14.06
claimed by ‘Leather’ and ‘Rubber’ components that are
150 7.33 240 25.00
‘0.613%’ and ‘0.644%’ respectively. But the Ferrous
175 7.25 180 43.75 materials, glass, tin, paper, plastic are not found in large
200 7.09 115 64.06 quantity may be the reason for the segregation of all these
items from the source of generation initially.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 180
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

The colour of leachate for all samples are almost same and
looks blackish. Study reveals that BOD, COD, TS, TSS and
TDS concentrations are always high in leachate without
rainfall condition. But rainfall dilutes the concentrations of
all above contaminations and transferred to soil structure of
landfill. Only the pH values are increases after rainfall in the
leachate. Pertaining to the microbiological characteristics of
leachate it may be noted that in all types of leachate,
coliform organism counts are above 3.6  105/100ml. This
may have a serious implication when leachate finds it’s way
into a nearby water body or spot sources. In analysis on the
performances of leachate treatment, the anaerobic biological
treatment shows best result in respect of all types of
physico-chemical treatments and only in physico-chemical
treatment, better performance shows by alum than lime.

5. CONCLUSION
The characteristics of solid wastes generated in the different
places of Delhi are very typical and it’s compositions varied
widely by weight from each other. From study it reveals that
total decomposable wastes are approximately 58.464%
where as non-decomposable i.e inorganic wastes are
41.536 % that posses a great threat to Okhla landfill for
shortage of land area in future. The production of inorganic
wastes should be minimize at the source of generation and is
better to reuse in any constructional project. The
contamination of leachate after rainfall becomes very low
except coliform count. This lighted a clear indication of
pollution of landfill due to non available of barricade that
needs protection for the existing vital environment soil, air,
water and biota.

REFERENCES
[1]. Chain , E.S and Dewalle, F.B., “Sanitary Landfill
Leachate and their Treatments” Journal of Environmental
Engineering Divn. ASCE (1974),102(EE-2) : 215-239.
[2]. Ho. S. Boyle, W.C, and Ham. R.K, “Chemical
Treatment of Leachates from Sanitary Landfill”, Journal of
Water Pollution Control Federation (2001) 46(7) : 1776-
1791
[3]. Rao, K. J, “Assessment and Management of
Environmental Pollution in some Developed Countries”,
Journal of IAEM .Vol-24 (1977) 68-77.
[4]. Smith , P. G , “ Treatment of Leachate from Landfills
”, The Public Health Engineers , Vol-9, No. 1-4, Jan'1981
[5]. Thorton. R.J and Blake. F.C., “Leachate Treatment by
Coagulation and Precipitation, Journal of Environmental
Div . ASCE(1998) , 99(EE-4): 535-544
[6]. Omar Al-Jarrah, Hani Abu- Qdais, “ Municipal solid
waste landfill sitting using intelligent system”, “Elsevier-
Waste Management, 26(2006), pp 299-306

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 02 | Feb-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 181