Design History
Design History
Design History
BACHELOR IN DESIGN
Professor: CLARA ZARZA GARCIA-ARENAL
E-mail: czarza@faculty.ie.edu
PREREQUISITES
SUBJECT DESCRIPTION
The goal for this course is to have students acquire a familiarity with the most relevant movements
and styles in the history of design along with the social, philosophical and technical factors that
contributed to the rise of design as the practice it is today. Thus, History of Design is based on the
principle that researching, analysing and communicating history through artefacts is the basis for
the understanding and practicing of design. We will examine, study, and discuss how design can be
understood, described, and developed as a process of inquiry, thought, and action that allows us to
understand the origin of the discipline and the problems that affect contemporary practices. The first
part of the course, History of Design I, will explore and question the limits of design and the
relevance of design history as an area of study. At the same time the course will provide basic
knowledge about the development of artistic expression and contemporary visual culture from a
historical perspective, touching upon examples of art, architecture and design from its inception to
Mid 20th century with the advent of modernity.
- To acquire the foundations in relation to key issues of visual culture and design history.
- To articulate and trace the development of important debates within the main literature of
design history and theory.
- To learn about the history of design from the Arts & Crafts movement to modernity and its
precedents.
- To learn about the main historiographic tendencies in Design and explore the development of
ideas in critical context.
- To learn how to develop critical ideas about design into a consistent argument.
Skills:
Published by IE Editorial
1|
- Use of and sensitivity towards relevant sources and primary texts in design, architecture and
art history, theory and criticism.
- The analysis and critical assessment of arguments and theories.
- Development of an understanding of historical perspective.
- The ability to formulate and express a persuasive argument or position both orally and in
written work.
- The use of the discipline’s basic knowledge as a tool to analyse and interpret present issues.
METHODOLOGY
The course consists of a blend of discussion and lecture based seminars and the engagement with
weekly readings through written assignments, group work and in class discussions and tasks.
Students will be expected to have read the pertinent texts before each session and to write a small
assignment or prepare a specific task in response to them. Interactivity and engagement is critical
to the learning process and therefore students will be encouraged to share their thoughts and ideas
in relation to issues presented in each seminar.
Based on the above competencies, the Professor will for his CLASS SESSIONS rely on a
combination of the below course formats: Lectures, Discussion Sessions, Student Presentations
and Student Debates.
Based on the above competencies, students will dedicate their INDIVIDUAL STUDY HOURS to:
2|
PROGRAM
SESSIONS 1 - 2
INTRODUCTION. WHEN WE THINK ABOUT DESIGN
Presentation and Lecture
In this introductory seminar we will question and explore what we understand as design. We will
also reflect upon the notion of “culture” as a key concept for the understanding of our relationships
with the material world and the ways in which this world structures knowledge and behaviors. The
professor will also present the structure, the main topics and the goals of the course along with
other practical aspects in relation to the evaluation system and the functioning of the class will be
discussed.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: Pp. 85, 93-94 and 103-104 (Christianity and Culture. The Idea of a Christian Society and Notes
towards the Definition of Culture)
SESSIONS 3 - 4
THINKING ABOUT A HISTORY OF DESIGN
Lecture and discussion
History of Design, as a branch within the traditional western discipline of History has inherited many
of its virtues and faults. In this seminar we will problematize the idea of “History” versus “histories”
and its link to Art History and the History of Architecture. Furthermore, we will question the very
subject of study: should a history of design be a history of doers or a history of artifacts? In order to
inform this debate and based on the mandatory readings we will explore different methods and
approaches to the construction of a history of Design.
Reading Assignment:
R.A.: Introduction: Telling the History of Design (Design Issues)
R.A.: Reconsidering the History of Design Survey (Journal of Design History)
B.C.: Form/Female Follows Function/Male: Feminist Critiques of Design (Design History and the
History of Design)
Task 1 (Individual): List a minimum of three reasons why a history of design and three problems
one might encounter or should take into account when producing one (bring a handwritten or hard
copy to class)
SESSIONS 5 - 6
WHAT ARTIFACTS DO
Lecture and discussion
This seminar will aim to provide a critical study of our material world and its sociability. Even before
we are able to speak or understand who we are we are already interacting with the material world.
Things play a role in the way we learn, trade, shop, fashion our selves, express our feelings or
preserve our memories. Whether it is a trendy pair of jeans, the latest technology item, an exotic
souvenir, or a scientific curiosity, objects seem to "entangle" us with the surrounding world. But,
how can we make sense of our relation with things? What makes them desirable? Are things able
to affect us?
3|
Reading/ Viewing Assignment:
B.C.: Pp.1-11 and 42-78 (Stuff by Miller, Daniel, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010)
Task 2 (Pairs): Define the concepts of ‘frame’ and ‘the humility of things’ in Miller’s terms and relate
it to Eliot’s notion of ‘culture’.
SESSIONS 7 - 8
THE CRAFTSMAN, THE GENIUS AND THE ISSUE OF AUTHORSHIP
Lecture and Discussion
During the Renaissance the process of division between arts and crafts gave way to complex
debates, about manual and intellectual ability, functionality and creativity, all of which are key to the
understanding of the birth of Design as a 19th Century discipline and the birth of romanticist and
modernist notions of artistic genius, originality, inspiration and innovation. Postmodern theory,
however, will problematize this trajectory and will regard the author as an artificial figure
constructed by capitalist societies in search of individual prestige. This seminar will offer the
opportunity to consider the key features of the social formation of the craftsman and the artist in
western culture and the relation of this social being to his work. Furthermore, it will lay the
groundwork for its revision and debate.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: pp.xiii- xiv (Italian art, 1500-1600; sources and documents)
B.C.: Chapter 1 (The Craftsman)
B.C.: pp. 142-148 (The death of the author)
Task 3 (Group Debate): You will be assigned a group and a theme in order to articulate a debate
around authorship and the relevance of the division between artist and craftsman (You need to
prepare an opening statement for the development of the debate)
SESSIONS 9 - 10
RELEVANT STUFF
Student Presentations and Discussion
Taking Miller’s notion of ‘stuff’ and our discussion on the power of artifacts as historical and social
agents this seminar will be dedicated to the group presentations of individual key studies. Following
the methodological and stylistic guidelines provided and explained in class each group must choose
an artifact produced before the Industrial revolution, research its origins, function, production and
use and analyze its historical and social power. The Professor will also provide a series of
questions to guide the student’s analysis.
Assignment 1: The students must present the results of their work in the form of both an “Oral
Presentation” in class (8 to 10 min) and a “Written Argumentative Report” to be submitted through
Turnitin before the class (800-1000 words).
T.N.: Guidelines for Oral Presentations (TED Talks)
T.N.: Guidelines for Written Argumentative Reports
T.N.: Guidelines for References
T.N.: When to Reference
T.N.: Criteria
SESSIONS 11 - 12
4|
BEFORE AND AFTER THE MACHINE AGE
Lecture and discussion
This seminar will be dedicated to the analysis of the changes brought about by the Industrial
revolution. This will allow us to further deepen in the understanding of the origins of design as a
discipline and the debate around the classical tradition and the idea of innovation. In this light we
will also initiate a reflection on the implications of studying cultural products (artworks, objects or
buildings) in the frame of an artistic movement.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: Norm and Form: The Stylistic Categories of Art History and their Origins in Renaissance Ideals
(Norm and Form: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance I)
B.C.: “What is Enlightment?” and “Critique of Judgement” (Art in theory)
Thought Piece 1: The Professor will provide an image, object or text to debate in class around the
implications of aesthetic standards and labels. Bring the texts prepared to the seminar.
SESSIONS 13 - 14
THE ARTS & CRAFTS MOVEMENT
Lecture/ Student Presentations and Discussion
In this seminar we will study the origins and development of the Arts and Crafts movement in the
United Kingdom and America between the 1880s and the1920s. We will problematize its
relationship with the uneven sprawl of the Industrial Revolution and the development of anti-
industrial and anti-modern sentiment that has rarely been pointed out.
Reading Assignment
R.A.: Ideas and Objects: The Arts and Crafts Movement in Britain (Design Issues)
Task 4 (Group presentation): Explore and choose an artifact produce within the Arts and Crafts that
you believe aligns with the ideology of the movement as portrayed by Crawford. Explain how it
relates to the movement and differs form other artifacts produced as a consequence of the
Industrial Revolution. (Following the guidelines provided by the professor prepare a 5 minute
presentation)
SESSIONS 15 - 16
THE INTERIOR WORLD OF ART NOUVEAU
Lecture/Discussion
The seminar will explore the shift in the locus of modernity in fin-de-siecle France, Belgium and
Spain from technological monument to private interior of the home and the role art nouveau played
in this process. We will also see the influences and interpretations of this movement and its
conflicting relationship to art deco.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: "Introduction. The Transformation of Art Nouveau, 1889-1900"’ and "Amaxone, Femme
Nouvelle and the Threat to the Bourgeois Family" (Art Nouveau in Fin-De-Sie`cle France: Politics,
Psychology, and Style)
Thought Piece 2: The Professor will provide an image, object or text to debate in class around the
impact of art nouveau in late nineteenth century bourgeoisie society. Bring the texts prepared to the
seminar.
SESSIONS 17 - 18
AVANT-GARDE MOVEMENTS
5|
Leture/Discussion
The first decade of the twentieth century witnessed an attempt to synthesize a new form of art
making, mainly inherited from a range of late nineteenth-century sources: namely, an art that was of
the new century yet could stand alongside the achievements of the classical tradition. This seminar
considers the various strands of European modernism and their legacy in relation to the design
disciplines. The notion of originality will be studied in relation to key avant-garde movements and
practices, with particular consideration given to their ideological, political and cultural contexts and
motives. Furthermore, the critical and utopian tendencies of twentieth-century avant-garde practices
will be emphasized as considered in terms of their lasting implications for the social role of design.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: Tristan Tzara ‘Dada Manifesto‘ (1918) (Motherwell)
B.C.: Pp. 6- 21 (The Originality of the Avant-garde and Other Modernist Myths)
Task 5 (Individual): What does originality mean for Modern/Avant-garde artists? How has this
notion been challenged or problematized by Krauss? Answer these questions and choose a
contemporary design product that you think is inspired or influenced by an avant-garde moment. Is
it original? Bring an image to class and be prepared to explain how it relates to an avant-garde
movement and to the notion of originality.
SESSIONS 19 - 20
BAUHAUS, THE SCHOOL FOR THE NEW MAN
Lecture/Discussion
In 1919, German architect Walter Gropius founded Bauhaus, the most influential art school of the
20th century. Bauhaus defined modernist design and radically changed our relationship with
everyday objects. Gropius wrote in his manifesto Programm des Staatlichen Bauhauses Weimar
that “There is no essential difference between the artist and the artisan.” His new school, which
featured faculty that included the likes of Paul Klee, László Moholy-Nagy, Josef Albers and Wassily
Kandinsky, did indeed erase the centuries-old line between applied arts and fine arts.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: pp-7-68 (The New Architecture and the Bauhaus)
B.C.: The Bauhaus: Evolution of an Idea (Criticism)
Assignment 2: Following the methodological and stylistic guidelines provided and explained in class
you must choose a design movement or individual style developed between the second half of the
19th century the 1930s research its context, aims and ideology and analyze its social innovations
and implications. The Professor will also provide a series of questions to guide the student’s
analysis. The students must present the results of their work in the form of an Argumentative Essay
to be submitted through Turniting before the class (800-1000 words)
SESSIONS 21 - 22
STYLE, STYLING AND LIFE STYLE
Lecture/Discussion
Some artifacts (everyday objects, art works, buildings) are often characterized by historians in
terms of style and some histories of art, design and architecture are written in the form of a
sequence of styles, in this seminar we will look in detail at the concepts of style, styling and lifestyle.
In order to deepen in our discussion we will concentrate in two case studies in the early 20th
century: Frank Lloyd Wright’s houses in America and Coco Chanel in France.
6|
Reading Assignment
R.A.: Style, Styling and Lifestyle (Design History and the History of Design)
Task 6 (Individual): Define the concepts of ‘style’ and how it can relate to social changes.
SESSIONS 23 - 24
INSPIRATION APPROPIATION AND EXOTICISM AND INSPIRATION
Lecture/Discussion
European interest in non-Western art was first stimulated by trade with the East in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries. As we have seen throughout the course, in the nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries artists and designers, fascinated by the artifacts brought from distant lands, will
seek inspiration in the material world of other cultures. In this seminar we will discuss the
implications of the travelling of object and their reception and re-interpretation in accordance with
the ideas and interests of Western cultures.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: Exotic Pleasures: Geography, Material Arts, and the ‘Agreeable’ World (Inventing Exoticism:
Geography, Globalism, and Europe's Early Modern World)
Other: Exoticism in the Decorative Arts (Timeline of Art History)
B.C.: Pp. 13-14 (The Postcolonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins)
Task 7 (Individual): Define the concepts of ‘exotic’ and explain the issues it brings.
SESSIONS 25 - 26
REFLECTIONS ON INFLUENCE, TASTE AND CONSUMPTION
Documentary view, Lecture and Discussion
Generally, design history and theory focus upon aspects of production – designers, designing,
manufacture – and the analysis of products rather than upon an equally crucial dimension – the role
of users and consumers. In this closing seminar we will try to correct this imbalance and open up a
new perspective with a discussion of consumption, reception and taste.
Reading Assignment
B.C.: Consumption, Reception, Taste (Design History and the History of Design)
Assignment 3: The professor will provide a wide question or issue in response to which the student
must build an argument (1000-1200 words). The student must engage with the ideas and
information extracted from the texts discussed in class to elaborate and to back up a complex
written argument.
SESSIONS 27 - 28
SEMINAR 14 (SESSIONS 27/28): REVIEW
Group Presentations and Discussion
This seminar will be dedicated to group presentation in relation to each seminar so as to revisit
some of the most important issues discussed so far and solve problems and questions raised in the
preparation of the final exam. Each group will be assigned a theme or an artwork corresponding to
the course seminars and will prepare a short presentation with the aim of reviewing issues seen in
class through the global perspective of the course.
Task 8 (Group Presentations): Each group will be assigned a theme corresponding to the course
seminars and will prepare a short presentation with the aim of reviewing the materials seen in class.
SESSIONS 29 - 30
7|
FINAL EXAM
In-class exam
This is a handwritten, no open book and in class exam. The professor will provide six
image/questions out of which you have to choose five and answer them in relation to what has
been studied during the course. Some of them will be more open and will require the interrelations
of texts and ideas discussed in class and some will be specific in the explanation of a single
concept.
Readings: All mandatory readings are included in the final exam
8|
BIBLIOGRAPHY
COMPULSORY
The readings assigned for each seminar, as detailed above, are mandatory. These readings will be
provided as PDF documents through the Documents folder of the course page on the Campus
Online.
RECOMMENDED
- Cumming, Elizabeth and Wendy Kaplan. The Arts and Crafts Movement, London: Thames and
Hudson, 1991.
- Duncan, Alastair. Art Nouveau, London: Thames and Hudson, 1994.
- Duncan, Alastair. Art Deco, London: Thames and Hudson, 1988.
- Hiesinger, Kathryn B, and George H. Marcus. Landmarks of Twentieth-Century Design, an
Illustrated Handbook. Abbeville, n.d.
- Hollis, Richard. Graphic Design. A Concise History, London: Thames and Hudson, 1994.
- Meggs, Philip B, and Alston W. Purvis. Meggs' History of Graphic Design, 2016.
- Walker, John A. and Judy Attfield. Design History and the History of Design. Pluto Press,
1989. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18mvngc
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Students will be evaluated continuously over the course of the semester, taking into account
attendance and student commitment and participation in class, especially during discussions and
debate, as well as the completion of assignments and tasks as assigned per the syllabus.
At the conclusion of the semester, the final grade will be determined by the students’ capacity to
understand (comprehension) and integrate (knowledge and synthesis) the information read and
discussed in relation to the core issues of the course in the construction of original thought
(application and argumentation). The result of this process of learning will be evaluated through the
weekly assignments and tasks, and the final exam.
Special consideration will be made for students’ commitment to and engagement with the material,
their participation in the discussion and debate sessions, as well as their initiative and creativity in
their personal investigation.
Your final grade in the course will be based on both individual and group work of different
characteristics that will be weighted in the following way:
9|
- Depth and Quality of Contribution to class discussions and activities: The most important
dimension of participation concerns what it is that you are saying. A high quality comment
reveals engagement of the weekly mandatory readings, depth of insight, rigorous use of case
evidence, consistency of argument, and realism.
- Moving Your Peers’ Understanding Forward: Great ideas can be lost through poor
presentation. A high quality presentation of ideas must consider the relevance and timing of
comments, and the flow and content of the ensuing class discussion. It demands comments
that are concise and clear, and that are conveyed with a spirit of involvement in the discussion
at hand.
- Frequency: Frequency refers to the attainment of a threshold quantity of contributions that is
sufficient for making a reliable assessment of comment quality. The logic is simple: if
contributions are too few, one cannot reliably assess the quality of your remarks. However,
once threshold quantity has been achieved, simply increasing the number of times you talk
does not automatically improve your evaluation. Beyond the threshold, it is the quality of your
comments that must improve. In particular, one must be especially careful that in claiming
more than a fair share of “airtime”, quality is not sacrificed for quantity. Finally, your attempts at
participation should not be such that the instructor has to “go looking for you”. You should be
attempting to get into the debate on a regular basis.
B. ASSIGNMENT 1: Group Presentation and Report
Following the methodological and stylistic guidelines provided and explained in class each group
must choose an artifact produced before the Industrial revolution, research its origins, function,
production and use and analyze its historical and social power. The Professor will also provide a
series of questions to guide the student’s analysis. The students must present the results of their
work in the form of both an “Oral Presentation” in class (8 to 10 min) and a “Written Argumentative
Report” to be submitted through Turniting before the class (800-1000 words).
C. ASSIGNMENT 2: Argumentative Essay
Following the methodological and stylistic guidelines provided and explained in class you must
choose a design movement or individual style developed between the second half of the 19th
century the 1930s research its context, aims and ideology and analyze its social innovations and
implications. The Professor will also provide a series of questions to guide the student’s analysis.
The students must present the results of their work in the form of an Argumentative Essay to be
submitted through Turniting before the class (800-1000 words).
D. ASSIGNMENT 3: Final Essay
The professor will provide a wide question or issue in response to which the student must build an
argument (1000-1200 words). The student must engage with the ideas and information extracted
from the texts discussed in class to elaborate and to back up a complex written argument.
E. FINAL EXAM
Achieve a minimum of 45/100 in the final exam. This is a handwritten, no open book and in class
exam. The professor will provide six image/questions out of which you have to choose five and
answer them in relation to what has been studied during the course. Some of them will be more
open and will require the interrelations of texts and ideas discussed in class and some will be
specific in the explanation of a single concept.
PROFESSOR BIO
10|
E-mail: czarza@faculty.ie.edu
Professor Zarza is a specialist on Contemporary Art History and Visual Theory. She has developed
interdisciplinary research in literary, anthropological and philosophical studies on identity, intimacy
and the autobiographical subject. The results of her work have been presented internationally with
a publication in Liverpool University Press and conferences in London, Lisbon, Loughborough and
Sussex, among others. Clara earned her BA in Art History at the Universidad Complutense de
Madrid with an MSc in History, Theory and Display by the School of Arts, Culture and Environment,
University of Edinburgh, Scotland. She has conducted research at the Amsterdam School for
Cultural Analysis (Amsterdam), in the School of Arts and Humanities at King's College (London)
and the Department of Art History and Communication Studies at McGill University (Montreal). Her
PhD ‘Intimate Spaces. Autobiographical Modes and Materials visible in the 1990s Euroamerican
Artworld’, defended in April 29 2014, has been awarded with the Extraordinary Doctoral Prize 2013-
2014 by Universidad Complutense de Madrid. She has been teaching at IE University since
January 2014, is a member of the Editorial Team of Efímera Revista (Biannual research journal on
art and performance) since March 2013 and is a member of GICELAH since January 2010, a group
dedicated to the study of literary and artistic strategies within the Hispanic cultural industry in the
19th, 20th and 21st century.
OTHER INFORMATION
- Office hours: Office hours will be held by appointment from Monday to Thursday.
- Contact details: czarza@faculty.ie.edu
1. Be on time: : Students arriving more than 5 minutes late will be marked as “Absent”.
Only students that notify in advance in writing that they will be late for a specific session may be
granted an exception (at the discretion of the professor).
2. If applicable, bring your name card and strictly follow the seating chart. It helps faculty
members and fellow students learn your names.
3. Do not leave the room during the lecture: Students are not allowed to leave the room during
lectures. If a student leaves the room during lectures, he/she will not be allowed to re-enter and,
therefore, will be marked as “Absent”.
Only students that notify that they have a special reason to leave the session early will be granted
an exception (at the discretion of the professor).
4. Do not engage in side conversation. As a sign of respect toward the person presenting the
lecture (the teacher as well as fellow students), side conversations are not allowed. If you have a
question, raise your hand and ask it. It you do not want to ask it during the lecture, feel free to
approach your teacher after class.
If a student is disrupting the flow of the lecture, he/she will be asked to leave the classroom and,
consequently, will be marked as “Absent”.
5. Use your laptop for course-related purposes only. The use of laptops during lectures must be
authorized by the professor. The use of Social Media or accessing any type of content not related
to the lecture is penalized. The student will be asked to leave the room and, consequently, will be
marked as “Absent”.
6. No cellular phones: IE University implements a “Phone-free Classroom” policy and, therefore,
the use of phones, tablets, etc. is forbidden inside the classroom. Failing to abide by this rule entails
expulsion from the room and will be counted as one absence.
11|
7. Escalation policy: 1/3/5. Items 4, 5, and 6 above entail expulsion from the classroom and the
consequent marking of the student as “Absent.” IE University implements an “escalation policy”:
The first time a student is asked to leave the room for disciplinary reasons (as per items 4, 5, and 6
above), the student will incur one absence, the second time it will count as three absences, and
from the third time onward, any expulsion from the classroom due to disciplinary issues will entail 5
absences.
12|