Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 367 views

    J Caveat SC

    Uploaded by

    TauheedAlam
    This document contains a caveat filed in the Supreme Court of India regarding a case between M. Amanullah and P. Prabhu & Ors. It notifies the court registrar that nothing should be done in the matter without prior notice to the counsel for the respondents/caveators. It refers to an impugned judgment dated November 20, 2007 passed by the Madras High Court in Review Application No. 140 of 2007 and M.P. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2007. The caveat is signed by the advocate for the respondent/caveator.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    J Caveat SC

    Uploaded by

    TauheedAlam
    367 views7 pages
    This document contains a caveat filed in the Supreme Court of India regarding a case between M. Amanullah and P. Prabhu & Ors. It notifies the court registrar that nothing should be done in the matter without prior notice to the counsel for the respondents/caveators. It refers to an impugned judgment dated November 20, 2007 passed by the Madras High Court in Review Application No. 140 of 2007 and M.P. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2007. The caveat is signed by the advocate for the respondent/caveator.

    Original Title

    J-Caveat-SC.doc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a caveat filed in the Supreme Court of India regarding a case between M. Amanullah and P. Prabhu & Ors. It notifies the court registrar that nothing should be done in the matter without prior notice to the counsel for the respondents/caveators. It refers to an impugned judgment dated November 20, 2007 passed by the Madras High Court in Review Application No. 140 of 2007 and M.P. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2007. The caveat is signed by the advocate for the respondent/caveator.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    367 views7 pages

    J Caveat SC

    Uploaded by

    TauheedAlam
    This document contains a caveat filed in the Supreme Court of India regarding a case between M. Amanullah and P. Prabhu & Ors. It notifies the court registrar that nothing should be done in the matter without prior notice to the counsel for the respondents/caveators. It refers to an impugned judgment dated November 20, 2007 passed by the Madras High Court in Review Application No. 140 of 2007 and M.P. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2007. The caveat is signed by the advocate for the respondent/caveator.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 7

    N THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

    SLP (C) Nos. OF 2005

    IN THE MATTER OF:


    M. Amanullah .. Petitioner

    Versus

    P. Prabhu & Ors


    … Respondents
    Caveators

    CAVEAT

    December, 12,2007
    To

    The Registrar
    Supreme Court of India,
    New Delhi - 110 001

    Sir,
    Let nothing be done in the above mentioned matter without prior

    notice/intimation to the undersigned i.e. Counsel for the

    Respondents/Caveators. The impugned judgement/order dated 20 th

    November , 2007 has been passed by the Hon’ble High Court of

    Judicature at Madras Review Application No. 140 of 2007. and M.P.

    NOS. 1 & 2 OF 2007

    Thanking you,
    Yours faithfully,

    [ DHARMENDRA KR. SINHA ]


    ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT /
    CAVEATOR,
    N THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION


    SLP (C) Nos. OF 2004

    WRIT PETITION NO.19713 OF 1998

    IN THE MATTER OF:

    1. The General Manager,


    Heavy Alloy Penetrator Project,
    Tiruchirapalli-620 025.

    2. Union of India, rep. By its Chairman,


    Ordnance Factory Board,
    10-A, Auckland Road,
    Calcutta-700 001. .

    Versus

    1. The Central Administrative Tribunal,


    Rep. By its Registrar,
    High Court Campus,
    Chennai-600 104.

    2. S. Amalraj
    3. M. Balasubramaniam
    4. T. Marimuthu
    5. R. Settu
    6. K. Veeran
    7. M. Arumugham
    8. K. Periyasamy
    9. K. Joseph
    10. V.M. Selvaraj
    11. A. Vellaisamy
    12. K. Nagarajan
    13. A. Philominraj
    14. K. Murugesan
    15. S. Arochiaswamy
    16. K. Kumaravadivel
    17. Savarinayagam
    18. P. Rajagopal
    19. P. Govindaraj
    20. R.K. Christopher
    21. M. Velmurugan
    22. S. Arumugam
    23. Selvaraj
    24. A.C. Chinnadurai
    25. M. Padmanabhan
    26. P. Kumar
    27. R. Kamalakannan
    28. M. Thangaraj
    29. J. Manickam
    30. E. Ganapathy
    31. S. Marimuthu
    32. V. Selvanndran
    33. S. Selvaraj
    34. C. Ramalingam
    35. V.S. Arockiasamy
    36. A. Sakthivel
    37. Malarkolundhu
    38. N. Rajendran
    39. R.E. Sivaraj
    40. P. Balu
    41. A. Rethinam
    42. S. John Moses
    43. N. Thangasami

    44. BHEL Complex,


    Cooperative Contract Society,
    Represented by its Secretary,
    Trichy-14. … Respondents

    AND IN THE MATTER OF:

    1. The General Manager,


    Heavy Alloy Penetrator Project,
    Tiruchirapalli-620 025.

    2. Union of India, rep. By its Chairman,


    Ordnance Factory Board,
    10-A, Auckland Road,
    Calcutta-700 001. .

    Versus
    1. S. Amalraj
    2. R. Settu
    3. M. Arumugham
    4. K. Periyasamy
    5. K. Joseph
    6. A. Vellaisamy
    7. A. Philominraj
    8. K. Murugesan
    9. K. Kumaravadivel
    10. R.K. Christopher
    11. S. Arumugam
    12. Selvaraj
    13. A.C. Chinnadurai
    14. M. Padmanabhan
    15. R. Kamalakannan
    16. M. Thangaraj
    17. E. Ganapathy
    18. S. Marimuthu
    19. V. Selvanndran
    20 S. Selvaraj
    21. C. Ramalingam
    22. N. Rajendran
    23. A. Rethinam
    24. P. Balu … Respondents
    Caveators

    CAVEAT

    November 27, 2004

    To

    The Registrar
    Supreme Court of India,
    New Delhi - 110 001

    Sir,
    Let nothing be done in the above mentioned matter without prior

    notice/intimation to the undersigned i.e. Counsel for the

    Respondents/Caveators. The impugned judgement/order dated 5 th

    November, 2004 has been passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature

    at Madras in Writ Petition No.19713 of 1998.

    Thanking you,
    Yours faithfully,

    [ ]
    ADVOCATES FOR THE RESPONDENT s/
    CAVEATORs
    , LAWYERS CHAMBERS,
    SUPREME COURT
    NEW DELHI - 110 001
    November 27, 2004
    N THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

    SLP (C) Nos. OF 2005

    IN THE MATTER OF:


    M. Amanullah .. Petitioner

    Versus

    Q. Prabhu & Ors


    … Respondents
    Caveators

    INDEX

    S.NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NO.

    1 Caveat / Vakalatnama and Memo of 1–4


    Appearance on behalf of the
    Respondents/Caveators

    FILED BY:

    Yours faithfully,

    [ DHARMENDRA KR. SINHA ]


    ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT /
    CAVEATOR,
    8, LAWYERS CHAMBERS,
    SUPREME COURT
    NEW DELHI - 110 001
    12. 12.2007

    You might also like