The Development of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Among Volunteers in The Normative Aging Study
The Development of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Among Volunteers in The Normative Aging Study
The Development of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Among Volunteers in The Normative Aging Study
1
Copyright © 1985 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health Printed in U.SA.
All rights reserved
Operations on the prostate are the most tate operations performed in 1979, giving a
frequently performed surgical procedures in rate of 22.6 per 1,000. Hyperplasia of the
men aged 65 years and over, and hyperpla- prostate is the fourth leading discharge di-
sia of the prostate is the leading reason for agnosis from non-Federal short stay hos-
prostate surgery (1, 2). In American males pitals for men 65 and older, with an annual
aged 65 and older there were 218,000 pros- r a t e of 16.5 discharges per 1,000 population
(1). In spite of its clinical and economic
Received for publication January 16, 1984, and in significance, there is remarkably Little in-
finalformApril 24,1984. formation relating precursor variables to
1
Normative Aging Study, Veterans Administration t n e onget ^ j t n e surgical treatment of
Outpatient Clinic, 17 Court St, Boston, MA 02108. . . . . 7 . .„ „. T
(Reprint requests to Dr. Glynn.) benign prostatic hyperplasia (2, 3). In par-
1
Geriatrics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, ticular, there have been no longitudinal
Boston, MA. afiidipa
3 slucue8
Division on Aging, Harvard Medical School, Bos- -
ton,4 MA. Previous case-control studies, examina-
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical tions of clinical series, and comparisons of
School, Boston, MA. . , ., . ., , , r ,
Supported by the Medical Research Service of the worldwide incidence rates have found some
Veterans Administration. important characteristics of benign pros-
78
DEVELOPMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA 79
tatic hyperplasia. Benign prostatic hyper- nosis and by surgery for benign prostatic
plasia is seldom found in men under age 40 hyperplasia? 2) Are Jewish men at greater
but beginning at age 40 there is a very risk than non-Jewish men? 3) Are marital
strong age-related increase, estimated by status, socioeconomic status, as well as cof-
Moore (4) to reach a prevalence of 75 per fee, alcohol and cigarette consumption re-
cent among men aged 80-90. Lytton et al. lated to the development of benign pros-
(5) have calculated the probability of a 40- tatic hyperplasia? 4) Are known risk factors
year-old man requiring an operation for for coronary heart disease and diabetes also
benign prostatic hyperplasia, if he lives to risk factors for benign prostatic hyperpla-
age 80, to be approximately 10 per cent. sia? 5) What is the risk of surgery among
The prevalence is low among Japanese and those men with a prior clinical diagnosis
distribution found in the Boston area. amination were excluded. These excluded
However, only 2 per cent of the volunteers men were younger at baseline (mean ±
were black, which is lower than the 3.7 per standard deviation (SD) = 40.4 ± 10.7
cent in the Boston metropolitan area (12). years) than the included men (mean ± SD
Additional information about the popula- = 41.9 ± 9.3 years). This slight but statis-
tion and a description of early dropouts tically significant difference (p < 0.05) in-
from the study have been published (13, dicates a tendency for younger men to dis-
14). continue participation in the study. In ex-
Screening and initial examination oc- amining prospectively the development of
curred between 1961 and 1970. Subse- a clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hy-
quently, men under age 52 have reported perplasia we further excluded the 101 men
TABLE 1 O.OT
TABLE 3
Incidence of surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia by age within specific categories of putative risk factors:
1,747 Normative Aging Study participants with no surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia prior to
entry into the study and with complete covariate information, followed from entry (between 1961 and 1970) until
their last examination prior to May 15, 1982
TABLE 5
Cox regression analysis of surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia in relation to previous examination
assessments of putative risk factors: 1,747 Normative Aging Study participants with no surgical treatment for
benign prostatic hyperplasia prior to entry into the study and with complete covariate information, followed from
entry (between 1961 and 1970) until their last examination prior to May 15, 1982
St«pwise model Full model
Variable* Standard x'to Standard
Coefficient Coefficient
error enter error
Entering the stepwise model
Age 0.0880 0.0154 67.71 0.0888 0.0166
Prior diagnosis of benign prostatic 1.2582 0.3064 15.42 1.2644 0.3097
hyperplasia
of 0.0880 means that, for two groups of men (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.90-
differing in age by 10 years but identical in 5.99).
all other important risk factors, older men The results of a Cox regression analysis
have an estimated incidence of surgery for considering predictors of a first clinical di-
benign prostatic hyperplasia approximately agnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia are
2.41 times the incidence of men 10 years shown in table 6. The variables considered
younger. The factor 2.41 is exp(0.880 X 10). as predictors were identical to the variables
A 95 per cent confidence interval for this in the previous regression with the excep-
estimate is 1.78-3.20. Similarly, the ad- tion of a prior clinical diagnosis. Although
justed rate ratio for men with a prior clin- four variables entered the stepwise model,
ical diagnosis compared with men with no only two, age and body mass index, could
prior diagnosis is 3.52 (95 per cent confi- be considered statistically significant. Age
dence interval = 1.93-6.42). Other adjusted was by far the most important predictor.
rate ratios are: 0.70 for men 20 units higher Controlling for age, men with lower body
in socioeconomic status (on a 100 point mass indices were somewhat more likely to
scale) compared with men at any specified have a clinical diagnosis than heavier men.
level (95 per cent confidence interval = Adjusted rate ratios from this model are:
0.54-0.91); 2.22 for Jewish men compared 1.99 for men 10 years older than men of
with non-Jews (95 per cent confidence in- any specified age (95 per cent confidence
terval = 1.13-4.35); and 2.32 for men cur- interval = 1.78-2.22); 0.82 for men 5 kg/m2
rently not smoking compared with current heavier than men with any specified body
smokers of one pack of cigarettes per day mass index (95 per cent confidence interval
DEVELOPMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA 87
TABLE 6
Cox regression analysis of a clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia in relation to previous examination
assessments of putative risk factors: 1,702 Normative Aging Study participants with no clinical diagnosis of
benign prostatic hyperplasia at entry into the study and with complete covariate information, followed from
entry (between 1961 and 1970) until their last examination prior to May 15, 1982
Stepwise model Full model
Variable*
Coefficient Standard x1 to Coefficient Standard
error enter error
Entering the stepwise model
Age 0.0687 0.0057 145.05 0.0712 0.0063
Body mass index -0.0404 0.0202 4.47 -0.0410 0.0215
Serum cholesterol -0.0022 0.0013 2.77 -0.0023 0.0013
= 0.67-1.00); 0.90 for men 50 mg/100 ml to the eighth decade. The sharpest increase
higher in serum cholesterol than men with in rate of first diagnosis occurred among
any specified level (95 per cent confidence men in their fifties, whereas the sharpest
interval = 0.79-1.02); and 1.35 for Jewish increase in rate of first surgery occurred
men compared with non-Jews (95 per cent among men in their sixties. The probability
confidence interval = 0.95-1.91). For vari- that a 40-year-old man who lives to age 80
ables entering the stepwise model, esti- will have surgery for benign prostatic hy-
mated coefficients and standard errors perplasia at some time during his life is
from this model were similar to the esti- estimated from this population to be about
mates from the full model; estimated stan- 0.29. This is almost three times the lifetime
dard errors in the full model were slightly estimate obtained by Lytton et al. (5) in
larger. When the proportional hazards their survey of prostate surgery in New
analysis was stratified by age, identical re- Haven between 1953 and 1961.
sults were obtained. No other risk factor could approach age
in the strength of its association with either
DISCUSSION a clinical diagnosis or surgery for benign
In spite of the increasing number of el- prostatic hyperplasia. A prior clinical di-
derly men in the population, and the cost agnosis was a strong predictor of surgery
to society of prostatic disorders, very little but there were many men with clinically
is known about the epidemiology of benign diagnosed benign prostatic hyperplasia at
prostatic hyperplasia. Among volunteers in entry into the study who did not have sur-
the Normative Aging Study, rates of both gery during the approximately 15 years of
first diagnosis and first surgery for benign follow-up, while other men had surgery
prostatic hyperplasia increased with age up with no prior clinical diagnosis. Of the 57
88 GLYNN ET AL.
men having surgery, 31 had a clinical di- creased risk of surgery for benign prostatic
agnosis at a prior examination. However, hyperplasia. The adjusted relative rate for
only nine of these 31 men had a clinical Jewish men compared with non-Jews of 2.2
diagnosis upon entry into the Normative found in the current study is quite consis-
Aging Study. Other than these nine, there tent with the relative risks of 2.4 reported
were 92 men with a clinical diagnosis at by Morrison (2) and 2.5 reported by Lytton
entry to the study who reported for at least et al. (5). The study by Armenian et al. (8)
one subsequent examination and did not reported identical percentages of Jewish
have surgery during follow-up. This sub- men in both their case and control series.
stantiates the variable clinical course of Lytton et al. noted the international differ-
benign prostatic hyperplasia, with some ences in incidence rates of benign prostatic