Zapanta V Montesa G.R. No. L-14534 February 28, 1962

EN BANC
G.R. No. L-14534 February 28, 1962
MERARDO L. ZAPANTA, petitioner,

vs.
THE HON. AGUSTIN P. MONTESA, ETC., ET AL., respondents.
Pedro M. Santos and Jorge C. Salonga for petitioner.

Office of the Solicitor General, Romulo L. Chua and Dewey G. Soriano for respondents.
DIZON, J.:
This is a petition for prohibition filed by Merardo L. Zapanta against the Hon. Agustin P. Montesa, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Bulacan, Fernando A. Cruz,
Provincial Fiscal of Bulacan, and Olimpia A. Yco, to enjoin the former from proceeding with the trial of Criminal Case No. 3405 pending the final determination of
Civil Case No. 1446 of the Court of First Instance of Pampanga.
Upon complaint filed by respondent Olimpia A. Yco on May 20, 1958, an information for Bigamy was filed by respondent Provincial Fiscal against petitioner in the
Court of First Instance of Bulacan (Criminal Case No. 3405), alleging that the latter, having previously married one Estrella Guarin, and without said marriage having
been dissolved, contracted a second marriage with said complainant.
On June 16, 1958, petitioner filed in the Court of First Instance of Pampanga Civil Case No. 1446 against respondent Olimpia A. Yco for the annulment of their
marriage on the ground of duress, force and intimidation. On the 30th of the same month respondent Yco, as defendant in said case, filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint upon the ground that it stated no cause of action, but the same was denied on July 7 of the same year. 1äwphï1.ñët
On September 2, 1958, petitioner, in turn, filed a motion in Criminal Case No. 3405 to suspend proceedings therein, on the ground that the determination of the issue
involved in Civil Case No. 1446 of the Court of First Instance of Pampanga was a prejudicial question. Respondent judge denied the motion on September 20, 1958 as
well as petitioner's motion for reconsideration, and ordered his arraignment. After entering a plea of not guilty, petitioner filed the present action.
We have heretofore defined a prejudicial question as that which arises in a case, the resolution of which is a logical antecedent of the issue involved therein, and the
cognizance of which pertains to another tribunal (People vs. Aragon, G.R. No. L-5930, February 17, 1954). The prejudicial question — we further said — must be
determinative of the case before the court, and jurisdiction to try the same must be lodged in another court (People vs. Aragon, supra). These requisites are present in the
case at bar. Should the question for annulment of the second marriage pending in the Court of First Instance of Pampanga prosper on the ground that, according to the
evidence, petitioner's consent thereto was obtained by means of duress, force and intimidation, it is obvious that his act was involuntary and can not be the basis of his
conviction for the crime of bigamy with which he was charged in the Court of First Instance of Bulacan. Thus, the issue involved in the action for the annulment of the
second marriage is determinative of petitioner's guilt or innocence of the crime of bigamy. On the other hand, there can be no question that the annulment of petitioner's
marriage with respondent Yco on the grounds relied upon in the complaint filed in the Court of First Instance of Pampanga is within the jurisdiction of said court.
In the Aragon case already mentioned (supra) we held that if the defendant in a case for bigamy claims that the first marriage is void and the right to decide such
validity is vested in another court, the civil action for annulment must first be decided before the action for bigamy can proceed. There is no reason not to apply the
same rule when the contention of the accused is that the second marriage is void on the ground that he entered into it because of duress, force and intimidation.
WHEREFORE, the writ prayed for in the petition is hereby granted. Without costs.
Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes and De Leon, JJ., concur.

Zapanta V Montesa G.R. No. L-14534 February 28, 1962

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Zapanta V Montesa G.R. No. L-14534 February 28, 1962

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Zapanta V Montesa G.R. No. L-14534 February 28, 1962

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-14534 February 28, 1962

MERARDO L. ZAPANTA, petitioner,

Pedro M. Santos and Jorge C. Salonga for petitioner.

You might also like