ARELLANO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II OUTLINE

ATTY ROBERTO A. DEMIGILLO
FIRST SEM 2018-19

CASE ASSIGNMENTS FROM TAXATION

ARTICLE III, 1987 CONSTITUTION

IV. TAXATION

Definition and Nature

Purpose
CIR vs. Algue, Inc., 158 SCRA 9 (1988) ALOG
Commissioner vs. Makasiar, 177 SCRA 27 (1989) ALOG
Scope (The power to tax is the power to destroy)
Who exercises the power?
Art. VI Sec. 28
Art. XIV, Sec. 4 (3)
Art. X, Sec. 5
Tax Exemptions
YMCA vs. CIR, 33 Phil. 217 (1916) ARUGAY
Bishop of Nueva Segovia vs. Provincial Board, 51 Phil. 352 (1927) ARUGAY
Lladoc vs. CIR, 14 SCRA 292 (1965) BALAN
Province of Abra vs. Hernando, 107 SCRA 104 (1981) BALAN
Abra Valley College vs. Aquino , 162 SCRA 106 (1988) CABALONGA
American Bible Society vs. City of Manila, 101 Phil. 386 (1957) CABALONGA
Double Taxation
Punzalan vs. Municipal Board of Manila, 95 Phil.46 (1954) CARINAN
License Fees
Physical Therapy Org. vs. Municipal Board, G.R. 10448, August 30, 1957 CARINAN

V. DUE PROCESS

Art. III, Sec. I, 1987 Constitution

Art. III. Sec. 14 (1)
Definition, Nature and Scope
Purpose of the guaranty
Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884) RINIO
Meaning of Life, Liberty, and Property
Substantive Due Process
Villegas vs. Hu Chong Tsai Pao Ho, 86 SCRA 275 (1978) DE CASTRO
Rubi vs. Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 (1919) DE CASTRO
United States v Toribio 15 Phil 85 DE LARA
Ynot v Intermediate Appellate Court 148 SCRA 659 DE LARA
Churchill v Raffarty 32 Phil 580 DESEO
People v Fajardo 100 Phil 443 DESEO
Acebedo Optical v Court of Appeals GR 100152 March 31, 2000 DIRONGAWAN
Lawrence v Texas June 26, 2003 DIRONGAWAN
City of Manila v Judge Laguio GR 118127 April 12, 2005 FABI
White Light Corp. v City of Manila GR 122846 January 20, 2009 FABI
Magtajas v Pryce Properties GR 111097 July 20, 1994 FABON
Bennis v Michigan No. 94-8729 March 4, 1996 F\ABON
M. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health No. 88-1503 June
25, 1990 FORMENTERA
Beltran v Secretary of Health G.R. No. 133640, November 25, 2005 FORMENTERA
Manalo v PNP Chief GR 178920 October 15, 2007 GANAS
Lucena Grand Central Terminal Inc. v JAC Liner, Inc. GR 148339 Feb .
23, 2005 GANAS
Void for Vagueness/Overbreadth RINIO
Ople v. Torres, 292 SCRA 141. (1998) JAZMIN
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001 JAZMIN
David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171390, May 3, 2006 LAPUZ
Ong v. Sandiganbayayn, G.R. No. 126858, September 16, 2005 LAPUZ
Procedural Due Process
Publication Requirement
Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 (1986) LAROYA
PITC v. Angeles, 263 SCRA 421 (1996) LAROYA
Republic v. Extelcom, G.R. 147096, January 15, 2002 LAVAREZ
 2

Impartial Court or Tribunal

Tanada vs. PAEC, 141 SCRA 307 (1986) CASTILLO
Anzaldo vs. Clave , 119 SCRA 353 (1982) MACATLANG
Tejano v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 159190, June 30, 2005 CASTILLO
Tumey vs. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1997) MARASIGAN
People v. Court of Appeals, 262 SCRA 452 (1996) MARASIGAN
Tabuena v. Sandiganbayan, 268 SCRA 332 (1997) PALAO
Prejudicial Publicity
Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) PALAO
Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (1995) PAMPLONA
People v. Sanchez, G.R. No. 121039, October 18, 2001 PAMPLONA
Notice and Hearing:
Summary Dismissal Board v. Torcita, 330 SCRA 153 (2000) SANTIAGO
Secretary of Justice v. Lantion, G.R. No. 139466, October 17, 2000 SANTIAGO
People vs. Estrada G.R. No. 130487 June 19, 2000 SARIP
Lim v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 111397, August 12, 2002 SARIP
Opportunity to be Heard
Budiongan v. De la Cruz, G.R. No. 170288, September 22, 2006 SENDIN
Roxas v. Vasquez, G.R. 114944, June 21, 2001 SENDIN
Marohombsar v. Judge Adiong, A.M. RTJ-02-1674, January 22, 2004 SEVILLANO
Exceptions to notice and hearing requirements
Philcomsat vs. Alcuaz, 180 SCRA 218 (1989) SEVILLANO
Suntay vs. People, 101 Phil. 833 (1957) SY
De Bisshop vs. Galang, 8 SCRA 244 (1963) SY
Var Orient Shipping Co., Inc. vs. Achacoso, 161 SCRA 232 (1988) VALLARUEL
Administrative Due Process
Ang Tibay vs. CIR, 69 Phil. 635 (1940) VILLARUEL
Montemayor vs. Araneta University Foundation, 77 SCRA 321 (1977) BATAOIL
Meralco vs. PSC, 11 SCRA 317 (1964) BATAOIL
Ateneo vs. CA, 145 SCRA 100 (1986) CANAVERAL
Alcuaz vs. PSBA, 161 SCRA 7 (1988) CANAVERAL
Non vs. Hon. Dames, G.R. No. 89317, May 30, 1990 CORDOVA
Fabella v Court of Appeals GR 110379 November 28, 1997 CORDOVA
Lao Gi Alias chia v Court of Appeals 180 SCRA 756 DE VOTA
People v Nazario 165 SCRA 186 DE VOTA
Corona v United Harbor Pilots GR 111953 December 12, 1997 ILAO
Army Navy Club v Court of Appeals GR 110223 April 8, 1997ILAO
J. Gonzales v NLRC and Ateneo de Davao. GR 125735 August 26, 1999 MARTIN
Pichay v Office of Deputy Executive Secretary for legal affairs, July 24, 2012,
GR 196425 MARTIN
______________________________________________________________________________

VI. EQUAL PROTECTION

Political, Economic and Social Equality

Art. XIII, Sec. 1 and 2 (social justice)
Id., Sec. 3 (protection to labor)
Art. XII, Sec. 10 (nationalization of business)
Id., Sec. 2, par. 2 (reservation of marine resources)
Art. II, Sec. 11 (free access to the courts)
Art. VIII, Sec. 5(5) (legal aid to poor)
Art. IX-C, Sec. 10 (protection of candidates)
Art. II, Sec. 26 (public service)
Art. II, Sec. 14 (equality of women and men)
Sexual Discrimination
Phil. Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386 (1988) MENZON
Administration of Justice
People vs. Hernandez, 99 Phil. 515 (1956) MENZON
People vs. Isinain, 85 Phil. 648 (1950) REALIZO
Chavez v. PCGG, G.R. 130716, December 9, 1998 SANTOS DAWN
Nunez vs. Sandiganbayan, 111 SCRA 433 (1982) SANTOS DAWN
Gallardo v. People, G.R. 142030, April 21, 2005 SANTOS MIKE
Public Policy
Central Bank Employees Assoc. v. BSP, G.R. No. 148208, Dec. 15, 2004 SANTOS MIKE
PNB v. Palma, G.R. 157279, August 9, 2005 SIGUAN
Unido vs. COMELEC, 104 SCRA 17 (1981) SIGUAN
PJA vs. Prado, 227 SCRA 703 (1993) SIM
Olivarez v. Sandiganbayan, 248 SCRA 700 (1995) SIM
Tiu v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127410, January 20, 1999 SYKIMTE
Coconut Oil Refiners v. Torres, G.R. 132527, July 29, 2005 SYKIMTE
ISAE v. Quisumbing, G.R. No. 128845, June 1, 2000 TINGAO
 3

PHILRECA vs. DILG, G.R. No. 143076. June 10, 2003 TINGAO
Beltran v. Secretary of Health, G.R. No. 133640, November 25, 2005 ALOG
People v Cayat 68 Phil 12, 18 ALOG
Dumlao v Comelec 96 SCRA 392 ARUGAY
Goesart v Cleary 335 U.S. 464 ARUGAY
Ormoc Sugar Central v Ormoc City L-23794 Feb. 17, 1968 BALAN
Sison v Ancheta 130 SCRA 654 BALAN
Himagan v People GR 113811 October 7, 1994 CABALONGA
Phil Judges Assn. v Prado GR 105371 November 11, 1993 CABALONGA
De Guzman Jr. v Comelec GR 129118 July 19, 2000 CARINAN
Phil Telegraph and Telephone v NLRC GR 118978 May 23, 1997 CARINAN
Parreno v CA GR 162224 June 7, 2007 DE ASIS
Central Bank Employees v Bangko Sentral GR 148208 Dec. 15, 2004 DE ASIS
Serrano v Gallant Maritime Services GR 167614 March 24, 2009 DE CASTRO
British American Tobacco v CamachoGR 163583 April 15, 2009 DE CASTRO
Quinto and Tolentino v Comelec GR 189698 Feb. 22, 2010 DE LARA
Disini jr. v Sec of Justice, GR 203335 Feb 11, 2014, Strict scrutiny test DE LARA
SM Metals v Reyes GR 179669 June 4, 2014 DESEO
__________________________________________________________________________

VII. THE NON-IMPAIRMENT CLAUSE

Art. III, Sec. 10

Purpose
When impairment occurs
When allowed
Emergency Powers
Rutter vs. Esteban, 93 Phil. 68 (1953) DESEO
Zoning and Regulatory Ordinances
Villanueva vs. Castaneda, 154 SCRA 142 (1987) DIRONGAWAN
Sangalang vs. IAC, 168 SCRA 634 (1988) DIRONGAWAN
Ortigas & Co. v. A, G.R. No. 126102, December 4, 2000 FABI
Home Building and Loan assn. v Blaisdell 290 U.S. 398 FABI
Juarez v Court of Appeals GR 93474 October 9, 1992 FABON
Administrative Regulations
Tiro vs. Hontanosas, 125 SCRA 697 (1983) FABON
Rental Laws
Caleon vs. Agus Development Corp., 207 SCRA 748 (1992) FORMENTERA
Tax Exemptions
Meralco v. Province of Laguna, 306 SCRA 750 (1999) FORMENTERA

_____________________________________________________________

VIII. ARRESTS, SEARCHES AND SEIZURES

Art. III, Sec. 2 and 3
Purpose and Importance of the guaranty
Alvero v. Dizon, 76 Phil 637 (1946) GANAS
To Whom Directed
People vs. Andre Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991) GANAS
Who May Invoke the Right
Bache and Co., vs. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 323 (1971) JAZMIN
Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967) JAZMIN
Zurcher vs. Stanford Daily, 436 U. S. 547 (1978) LAPUZ
Wilson v. Layne, 98-0083, May 24, 1999 LAPUZ
Conditions for a valid warrant
Existence of Probable Cause
Burgos vs. Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 800 (1984) LAROYA
Chandler v. Miller, April 15, 1997, D-96-126 LAROYA
People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432) (1999) LAVAREZ
People v. Molina, G.R. No. 133917, February 19, 2001 MACATLANG
Partially Valid Warrant
People v. Salanguit, G.R. 133254, April 18, 2001 MACATLANG
Microsoft Corp. v. Maxicorp., G.R. 140946, September 13, 2004 MARASIGAN
Personal determination by judge
Sta. Rosa Mining Co., vs. Fiscal Zabala, 153 SCRA 367 (1987) MARASIGAN
Paderanga vs. Drilon, G.R. 96080, April 19, 1991 PALAO
Pita vs. CA, 178 SCRA 362 (1987) PALAO
Abdula v. Guiani. 326 SCRA 1 (2000) PAMPLONA
People v. Mamaril, G.R. 147607, January 22, 2004 PAMPLONA
Examination of witnesses
 4

Pasion Vda. De Garcia vs. Locsin, 65 Phil 68 (1938) SANTIAGO

Yee Sue Kuy vs. Almeda, 70 Phil. 141, (1940) SANTIAGO
Alvarez vs. CFI, 64 Phil. 33 (1937) SARIP
Mata vs. Bayona , 128 SCRA 388 (1984) SARIP
Particularity of description
Olaes vs. People, 155 SCRA 486 (1987) SENDIN
Prudente vs. Judge Dayrit, 180 SCRA 69 (1989) SENDIN
Chia vs. Coll. of Customs, 177 SCRA 755 (1989) SEVILLENO
20th Century Fox Film Corp. vs. CA, 164 SCRA 655 (1988) SEVILLENO
People v. Choi, G.R. No. 152950, August 3, 2006 SY
Nolasco vs. Cruz Pano, 132 SCRA 152 (1985) SY
PICOP v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 253) (1999) VILLARUEL
Yousef Al Ghoul vs. C.A, GR No.126859, September 4, 2001 VILLARUEL
Del Rosario v. People G.R. No. 142295, May 31,2001).
Objects of Seizure
Rule 126, Sec. 3, Rules of Court (ROC)
Unilab v. Isip, G.R. No. 163858, June 28, 2005 BATAOIL
Warrantless searches
Valid Waiver
People vs. Omaweng, 213 SCRA 462 (1992) BATAOIL
People v. Correa, 285 SCRA 679 (1998) CANAVERAL
People vs. Ramos, G.R. 85401-02, June 4, 1990 CANAVERAL
People v. Barros, 231 SCRA 557 (1994) CORDOVA
Veroy vs. Layague, 210 SCRA 97 (1992) CORDOVA
People vs. Damaso, 212 SCRA 457 (1992)DE VOTA
Lopez vs. Comm. Of Customs, 68 SCRA 320 (1975) DE VOTA
Caballes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136292, January 5, 2002 ILAO
People vs. Asis, et. al., G.R. No. 142531, October 15, 2002 ILAO
People vs. Tudtud, et. al., G.R. No. 144037, September 26, 2003 MARTIN

Incident to lawful arrest

Rule 126, Section 13, Rules of Court
Chimel vs. California, 395 U. S. 752 (1964) MARTIN
People vs. de la Cruz, G.R. 83988, April 18, 1990 MENZON
People v. Kalubiran, 196 SCRA 645 (1991) MENZON
People v. Malmstedt, 198 SCRA 401 (1991) SANTOS DAWN
Espano v. Court of Appeals, 288 SCRA 558 (1998) SANTOS DAWN
People vs. Tangliben, 184 SCRA 220 (1990) SANTOS MIKE
People v. Che Chun Ting, 328 SCRA 592 (2000) SANTOS MIKE
People vs. Estrella, G.R. Nos. 138539-40, January 21, 2003 SIGUAN
People vs. Libnao, et al., G.R. No. 136860, January 20, 2003 SIGUAN
Plain view doctrine
People v. Musa, 217 SCRA 597 (1993) SIM
Padilla v. CA, 269 SCRA 402 (1997) SIM
People v. Valdez, G.R. No. 129296, September 25, 2000 SYKIMTE
Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 [1987]} SYKIMTE
People v. Compacion, G.R. No. 124442, July 20, 2001 TINGAO
People v. Huang Zhen Hua, G.R. 139301, September 29, 2004 TINGAO
Enforcement of fishing, customs and immigration laws
Roldan vs. Area, 65 SCRA 320 (1975) ALOG
People v. Gatward, 267 SCRA 785 (1997) ALOG
People v. Johnson, G.R. No. 138881, December 18, 2000 ARUGAY
People vs. Suzuki, G.R. No. 120670, October 23, 2003 ARUGAY
“Stop and frisk”
Terry vs. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)
People v. Solayao, 262 SCRA 255 (1996) BALAN
Manalili v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 113447, October 7, 1997 BALAN
Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159 (1997) CABALONGA
Florida v. J.L., 98-1993, March 28, 2000 CABALONGA
Search of moving vehicles
Papa vs. Mago, 22 SCRA 857 (1968) CARINAN
People vs. CFI of Rizal, 101 SCRA 86 (1980) CARINAN
Salvador v. People, G.R. No. 146706, July 15, 2005 DE ASIS
Whren v. United States, 95-5841, January 10, 1996 DE ASIS
Emergency circumstances
People vs. De Gracia 233 SCRA 716 (1994) DE CASTRO
Checkpoints
Gen. De Villa vs. Valmonte G.R. No. 83988, May 24, 1990 DE CASTRO
Aniag vs. Comelec, 237 SCRA 424 (1994) DE LARA
People v. Usana, 323 SCRA 754 (2000) DE LARA
People v. Vinecario, G.R. No. 141137, January 20, 2004 DESEO
 5

Inspection of buildings
Camara vs. Municipal Court, 387 U. S. 523 (1967) DESEO
Warrantless arrests
Rule 113, Sec. 5
Art. 125, Revised Penal Code
Rebellion as Continuing Offense
Umil vs. Ramos, G. R. 81567, July 9, 1990 DIRONGAWAN
Committed in the Presence of Police Officers
People v. Sucro, 195 SCRA 388 (1991) DIRONGAWAN
People v. Luisito Go, G.R. No. 116001, March 14, 2001 FABI
Personal Knowledge of the Offense
People vs. Gerente, 219 SCRA 756 (1993) FABI
People v. Sinoc, 275 SCRA 357 (1997) FABON
People v. Baula, G.R. No. 132671, November 15, 2000 FABON
People v. Cubcubin, G.R. No. 136267, July 10, 2001 FORMENTERA
Time of Arrest
People vs. Rodrigueza, 205 SCRA 791 (1992) FORMENTERA
Go vs. Court of Appeals, 206 SCRA 586 (1992) GANAS
People v. Calimlim, G.R. No. 123980, August 30. 2001 GANAS
Marked Money
People vs. Enrile, 222 SCRA 586 (1993) JAZMIN
Lack of Urgency
People v. Pasudag, G.R. No. 128822, May 4, 2001 JAZMIN
People vs. Aminnudin, 163 SCRA 402 (1988) LAPUZ
Effect of Bail
Rule 114, Section 26
Effect of Entry of Plea
People v. Plana G.R. No. 128285, November 27, 2001 LAPUZ
Validity of Conviction
People v. Conde, G.R. No. 113269, April 10, 2001 LAROYA

Del Castillo v People, GR 185 128 Jan 30, 2012 LAROYA

` Luz v People, GR 197788 Feb 29, 2012 LAVAREZ
People v Lara GR 199877 Aug 13, 2012 LAVAREZ
People v Belocura, GR 173474, Aug 29, 2012 MACATLANG
____________________________________________________________

IX. PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION & CORRESPONDENCE

R.A. No. 4200 (Anti-Wire Tapping Law) (1965)
Arts, 290, 291, 292 and 299. Revised Penal Code.
Gaanan vs. IAC, 145 SCRA 113 (1986) MACATLANG
Katz vs. U.S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967) MARASIGAN
Ramirez vs. CA, G.R. No. 93833, September 28, 1995 MARASIGAN
Salcedo-Ortanez v. CA, 235 SCRA 111 (1994) PALAO
Alejano v. Cabuay, G.R. No. 160792, August 25, 2005 PALAO
Privileged Communications
In Re Laureta, 148 SCRA 382 (1987) PAMPLONA
People vs. Albofera, 152 SCRA 123 (1987) SANTIAGO
Zulueta v. Court of Apeals, 253 SCRA 699 (1996) SANTIAGO
Deano v. Godinez, 12 SCRA 483 (1964) SARIP
Waterhouse Drug Corporation v. NLRC, G.R. No. 113271. October 16, 1997 SARIP
Exclusionary Rule
Art. III, Sec. 3(2)
Silverthorne Lumber vs. US, 251 US 385 (1920) SENDIN
People v. Aruta, G. R. 120915, April 3. 1998 SENDIN
People v. Rondero, G.R. 125687, December 9, 1999 SEVILLENO
Liability for damages
Aberca vs. Ver, 160 SCRA 590 (1989) SEVILLENO

Ople v Torres GR 127687 July 23, 1998 SY

Vivares v St. Theresa’s College GR 202666 Sept 29, 2014 SY
_____________________________________________________________________________

X. RIGHTS OF PERSONS UNDER CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION

Art. III, Sec , 12
Miranda vs. Arizona , 384 US , 436 (1966) VILLARUEL
Custodial Investigation
People v. Lugod, G.R. 136253, February 21, 2001 VILLARUEL
People v. Del Rosario G.R. 127755, April 14, 1999 BATAOIL
People v. Bolanos, 211 SCRA 262 (1992) BATAOIL
Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, [1980] CANAVERAL
 6

People v. Mahinay, 302 SCRA 455 (1999) CANAVERAL

Administrative Investigations
People vs. Judge Ayson, 175 SCRA 216 (1989) CORDOVA
Office of the Court Administrator v. Sumilang, 271 SCRA 316 (1997) CORDOVA
People v. Uy, G.R. No. 157399, November 17, 2005 DE VOTA
Police Lineup
Gamboa vs.Cruz, 162 SCRA 642 (1988) DE VOTA
United States v. Wade, 388 U.A. 218 (1967) ILAO
People v. Escordial, G.R. 138934, January 16, 2002 ILAO
People vs. Piedad, et al., G.R. No. 131923, December 5, 2002 MARTIN
Cases before January 17, 1973 not applicable
Magtoto vs.Manguera, 63 SCRA 4 (1975) MARTIN
Rule under the 1973 Constitution (Voluntary, knowing & intelligent waiver)
People vs. Caguioa, 95 SCRA 2 (1980) MENZON
People vs. Tampus, 90 SCRA 624 (1980) MENZON
People v. Sayaboc, G.R. 147201, January 15, 2004 SANTOS DAWN
The Galit Rule
People vs. Galit, 135 SCRA 465 (1985) SANTOS DAWN
Rule under the 1987 Constitution
Requirement of Competent & Independent Counsel
People vs. Bandula, 232 SCRA 566 (1994) SANTOS MIKE
People v. Quidato, G.R. 117401, October 1, 1998 SANTOS MIKE
People v. Januario. 267 SCRA 608 (1997) SIGUAN
People v. Labtan, GR. No. 12793, December 8, 1999 SIGUAN
People vs. Samus, G.R. 135957-58, September 17, 2002 SIM
People v. Tomaquin, G.R. No. 133138, July 23, 2004 SIM
People v. Bagnate, G.R. No. 133685-86 May 20, 2004 SYKIMTE
Counsel of Choice
People vs. Gallardo, G.R. No. 113684, Jan. 25, 2000 SYKIMTE
People vs. Barasina, 229 SCRA 450 (1994) TINGAO

Counsel’s presence required in entire proceedings

People v. Morial, G.R. 129295, August 15, 2001 TINGAO
Seized Articles
People v. Castro. 274 SCRA 115 (1997) ALOG
People v. Wong Chuen Ming. 256 SCRA 182 (1996) ALOG
Marcelo v. Sandiganbayan, 302 SCRA 102 (1999) ARUGAY
People v. Macabalang, G.R. 168694, November 27, 2006 ARUGAY
Confession to Newsmen
People v. Andan. 269 SCRA 95 (1997) BALAN
People v. Endino, G.R. 133026, February 20, 2001 BALAN
People vs. Ordono, G.R. No. 132154, June 29, 2000 CABALONGA
People vs. Guillermo, GR. No. 147786, January 20, 2004 CABALONGA
Other Confessions
People v. Malngan, G.R. No. 170470, September 26, 2006 CARINAN
People v. Gomez, 270 SCRA 432 (1997) CARINAN
Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292 (1990) DE ASIS
People v. Lugod, G.R. 136253, February 21, 2001 DE ASIS
Re-enactment
People v. Luvendino, 211 SCRA 36 (1992) DE CASTRO
Exclusionary rule
Art. III, Sec. 12 (3)
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine
People v. Alicando 251 SCRA 293 (1995) DE CASTRO
Harris vs. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971) DE LARA
New York vs. Quarles, 104 S. U. 2626 (1984) DE LARA
_____________________________________________________________

CASE ASSIGNMENTS FROM RIGHT TO BAIL TO END OF SEMESTER

XI. RIGHT TO BAIL

Art. III, Sec. 13
Bail Defined
Rule 114, Section 1, ROC
Kinds of Bail
Rule 114, Sections 10, 11, 14 & 15
When right may be invoked
Herras Teehankee vs. Rovira, 75 Phil. 634 (1945)
People vs. San Diego, 26 SCRA 522 (1968)
 7

Cortes v. Judge Catral, A.M. No. RTJ-97-1387, September 10, 1997

Lavides v. CA, G.R. No. 129670. February 1, 2000
Government v. Judge Puruganan, G.R. 148571, December 17, 2002
Procedure for bail
Paderanga v. Drilon, 247 SCRA 741, (1995).
Go v. Bongolan. A.M. 99-1464, July 26, 1999
People v. Gako, G.R. 135045, December 15, 2000
Bail and Habeas Corpus
Enrile vs. Salazar, 186 SCRA 217 (1990)
People vs. Judge Donato, 198 SCRA 130 (1991)
Bail on appeal
People vs. Fortes, 223 SCRA 619 (1993)
Maguddatu v. CA, G.R. No. 139599. February 23, 2000
Obosa v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 114350, January 16, 1997
Standards for fixing bail
Rule 114, Sec. 9
Villasenor vs. Abano, 21 SCRA 312 (1967)
De la Camara vs. Enage, 41 SCRA 1 (1971)
Almeda vs. Villaluz, 66 SCRA 38 (1975)
Yap v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141529, June 6, 2001
Cabañero v. Cañon, A.M. No. MTJ-01-369, September 20, 2001
Victory Liner v. Belosillo, G.r. 425 SCRA 79 (2004)
Bail and the Right to Travel Abroad
Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals, 142 SCRA 149 (1980)

XII. RIGHTS OF AN ACCUSED

Art. III, Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution

Presumption of Innocence
Proof beyond reasonable doubt
People vs. Dramayo, 42 SCRA 59 (1971)
Order of Trial
Alejandro vs. Pepito, 96 SCRA 322 (1988)(modified by Rule 119 Sec. 3 (e)
Presumption of Guilt
Dumlao vs. Comelec, 95 SCRA 392 (1980)
People vs. Mingoa, 92 Phil. 857 (1953)
Applicability to Juridical Persons
Feeder Int’l Line vs. CA CR 94262 May 31, 1991
Official Duty
People vs. Martos, 211 SCRA 805 (1992)
Equipoise Rule
Corpuz vs. People, 194 SCRA 73 (1991)
Dizon Paminatuan v. People, July 11, 1994
Right to be heard personally or by counsel
Importance of Counsel
People vs. Holgado, 85 Phil. 752 (1950)
Delgado vs. CA, 145 SCRA 357 (1986)
Improvident Plea of guilt
People vs. Baluyot, 75 SCRA 148 (1977)
People vs. Magsi, 124 SCRA 69 (1983)
People v. Besonia, G.R. No. 151284-85, February 5, 2004
People v. Murillo, G.R. No. 134583, July 14, 2004
Right to Lawyer of Choice
People vs. Malunsing, 63 SCRA 493(1975)
Libuit v. People, G.R. No. 154363, September 13, 2005
Deprivation of Right to be Heard
Moslares v. CA, 291 SCRA 440 (1998)

Right to be informed of nature and cause of accusation

Lack of Arraignment
Borja vs. Mendoza, 77 SCRA 422 (1977)
People v. Alcalde, G.R. 139225, May 29, 2002
People v. Dy, G.R. 115236, January 29, 2002
Sufficiency of the Information
People v. Sadiosa, 290 SCRA 82 (1998)
People v. Perez, G.R. No. 122764, September 24, 1998
People v. Lozano, G.R 125080, September 25, 1998
People v. Ladrillo, GR. No. 124342, December 8, 1999
People v. Valdesancho, G.R. 137051, May 30, 2001
 8

People v. Alcaide, G.R. Nos. 139225-28, May 29, 2002

People vs. Ostia, G.R. No. 131804, February 26, 2003
People vs. Flores Jr., G.R. No. 128823-24, December 27, 2002
People v. Cachapero, G.R. No. 153008, May 20, 2004

Right to speedy, impartial and public trial

Speedy trial
Acevedo vs. Sarmiento, 36 SCRA 247 (1970)
People vs. Judge Laya, 161 SCRA 327 (1988)
Conde vs. Rivera, 45 Phil. 650 (1924)
Dacanay vs. People, 240 SCRA 490 (1995)
People v. Rivera, G.R. No. 139180, July 31, 2001
Solar Team Entertainment v. How, G.R. No. 140863, August 22, 2000
Valencia v. Sandiganbayan. G.R. No. 165996, October 17, 2005
Domondon v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 166606. November 29, 2005
Public trial
Garcia vs. Domingo, 52 SCRA 143 (1970)
Perez v. Estrada, A.M. No. 01-4-03-SC, June 29, 2001
Impartial trial
Tumey vs. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927)
Soriano vs Angeles, G.R. No. 109920. August 31, 2000

Right to confront witnesses

U.S. v. Javier, 37 Phil. 449 (1918)

Right to secure attendance of witnesses

U.S. vs. Garcia, 10 Phil. 384 (1908)
People vs. Sandal, 54 Phil. 883 (1938)
People vs. De Luna, 174 SCRA 204 (1989)

Right to be present during trial

Trial in absentia
Rule 115, Sec. 1 (c)
People vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 140285, September 27, 2006
When presence of the accused is a duty:
Arraignment and plea
Rule 116, Sec. 1 (b)
During trial for identification
Aquino vs. Military Commission No. 63 SCRA 546 (1975)
People vs. Salas, 143 SCRA 163 (1986)
Promulgation of sentence
Rule 120, Sec. 6
Exception: Light offenses

Privilege against Self-Incrimination

Art. III, Sec. 17
Scope covers compulsory testimonial incrimination
United States vs. Tan Teh, 23 Phil. 145 (1912)
United States vs. Ong Siu Hong, 36 Phil. 735 (1917)
People vs. Otadura, 86 Phil. 244 (1950)
Villaflor vs. Summers, 41 Phil. 62 (1920)
Bermudez vs. Castillo, 64 Phil. 485 (1937)
Beltran v. Samson, 53 Phil. 570 (1929)
People vs. Tranca, 235 SCRA 455 (1994)
South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983)
Schemerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
People v. Rondero, GR. No. 125687, December 9, 1999
People vs. Gallarde, G.R. No. 133025. February 17, 2000.
In what proceedings available
Pascual vs. Board of Medical Examiners, 28 SCRA 344 (1969)
Galman vs. Pamaran, 138 SCRA 274 (1985)
Use Immunity v. Transactional Immunity.
Art. XIII, Sec. 18 (8)
R.A. No. 1379, Section 8
Galman vs. Pamaran, 138 SCRA 274 (1985)
 9

Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591

Exclusionary rule
Art. II, Sec. 12 (3)
Effect of denial of privilege by court
Chavez vs. Court of Appeals, 24 SCRA 663 (1968)

___________________________________________________________________

RIGHT TO Speedy Disposition of Cases

Art. III, Sec. 16
Art. VIII, Sec. 15
Art. VII, Sec. 19 par. 3
Art. IX, A, Sec. 17
Duterte v. Sandiganbayan, 289 SCRA 721 (1998)
Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan ; 159 SCRA 70 (1988)
Licaros v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. 145851, November 22, 2001
Dimayacyac v. Judge Roxas, G.R. No. 136264, May 28, 2004
Bernat v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 158018. May 20, 2004

_______________________________________________________________________

XIII. PUNISHMENTS
Excessive fines and cruel, degrading and inhuman punishments
People vs. Dela Cruz, 92 Phil. 906 (1953)
People vs. Borja, 91 SCRA 340 (1978)
People vs. Dacuycuy, 173 SCRA 90 (1989)
Loiusiana v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947)
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 [1986]
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)
The death penalty
Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 132601 January 19, 1999

_______________________________________________________________________

XIV. INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE

Art. III, Sec. 18
Aclaracion vs. Gatmaitan, 64 SCRA 131 (1979)

________________________________________________________________________

XV. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT

Art. III, Sec. 20

Sura vs. Martin, 26 SCRA 286 (1969)
People vs. Nitafan, 207 SCRA 726 (1992)
In Re: Habeas Corpus of Benjamin Vergara, G.R. No. 154037. April 30, 2003

_________________________________________________________________

XV. EX POST FACTO LAWS AND BILLS OF ATTAINDER

Art III, Sec. 22

Kay Villegas Kami, 35 SCRA 429 (1970)
People vs. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382 (1972)
People vs. Sandiganbayan, 211 SCRA 241 (1992)
Wright vs. CA, 235 SCRA 341 (1994)

XVI. DOUBLE JEOPARDY

Art. III, Sec. 21

Rule 117, Sec. 7
Rule 120, Sec. 5
Elements
People vs. Obsania, 23 SCRA 1249 (1968)
Subsequent prosecution barred; Exceptions
Melo vs. People, 85 Phil. 766 (1959)
People vs.Yorac, 42 SCRA 230 (1971) (overruled)
PSB v. Bermoy, G.R. No. 151912, September 26, 2005
Heirs of Rillorta vs. Firme, 157 SCRA 518 (1988)
 10

People vs. Miraflores, 115 SCRA 586 (1982)

People vs. Judge Vergara, 221 SCRA 560 (1993)
Tupaz v. Ulep, GR. No. 127777, October 1, 1999
Argel v. Judge Pascua, A.M. No. RTJ-94-1131, August 20, 2001
Jurisdiction of Courts
People v. Bocar, 138 SCRA 166 (1985)
Galman vs Sandiganbayan, 144 SCRA 43 (1986)
People vs. Grospe, 157 SCRA 154 (1988)
People vs. Judge Santiago, 174 SCRA 143 (1989)
Identity of Acts
People vs. Relova, 148 SCRA 292 (1987)
Identity of Offenses
People vs. City Court, 154 SCRA 175 (1987)
Nierras vs. Dacuycuy, 181 SCRA 1 (1990)
Military Court Proceedings
Cruz vs.Enrile, 160 SCRA 702 (1988)
Tan v. Barrios. October 18, 1990
Right to Speedy Trial
Que vs. Cosico, 177 SCRA 410 (1989)
Caes vs. IAC, 179 SCRA 54 (1989)
Administrative & Criminal Proceedings
Icasiano vs. Sandignabayan, 209 SCRA 377(1992)
Vincoy v. CA, G.R. No. 156558, June 14, 2004
People v. Larannaga, G.R. No. 138874, July 21, 2005
Plea of Guilt to Lesser Offense
People vs. Judge Villarama, 210 SCRA 246 (1992)

People v Quijada 259 SCRA 191

_________________________________________________________________

XVII. PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Art. II, Sec. 15

Art. VII, Sec, 18
Villavicencio vs. Lukban, 39 Phil 778 (1919)
Moncupa vs. Ponce Enrile, 141 SCRA 223 (1986)
Lansang vs. Garcia, 42 SCRA 448 (1971)
Chavez vs. Court of Appeals, 24 SCRA 663 (1968)
Gumabon vs. Director of Prisons, 37 SCRA 420 (1971)
In re Abadilla, 156 SCRA 92 (1987)
Norberto Feria vs. CA, et al. G.R. 122954 Feb 15, 2000
Illusorio v. Bildner, G.R. 139789, May 12, 2000

Writ of Amparo and Writ of Habeas Data

Marynetter Gamboa v P/SSPT Marlou Chan, July 24, 2012
In the matter of the Petition for the issuance of Writ of Amparo in favor of
Lilibeth Kadaga GR 189689 Nov 13, 2012

_____________________________________________________________________

XVIII. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Art. III, Sec. 4

Id., Sec. 18 (1)
Purpose
United States vs. Bustos, 37 Phil. 731 (1918)
Burgos vs. Chief Of Staff, 133 SCRA 800 (1984)
New York Times vs. Sullivan 380 US 51 (1964)
Restrictions
Gonzales vs. COMELEC, 27 SCRA 835 (1969)
Social Weather Station v. Comelec, G.R. 147571, May 5, 2001
Balancing of Interest Test
Dangerous Tendency Test
Clear and Present Danger Test
Zaldivar vs. Sandiganbayan, 170 SCRA 1 (1989)
Sanidad vs. COMELEC, G.R. 90878, January 29, 1990
Reno v. ACLU, D-96-511 June 26, 1997
Miriam College v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127930 December 15, 2000
ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. v. Comelec, G.R. No. 133486, January 28, 2000
Chavez v. Comelec
Freedom of Expression, Libel and National Security
 11

Babst vs. NIB, 132 SCRA 316 (1984)

Espuelas vs. People, 90 Phil. 524 (1951)
Elizalde vs. CFI 116 SCRA 93 (1982)
Lopez vs. Court of Appeals, 34 SCRA 116 (1970)
PJI v. Thoenen, G.R. No. 143372, December 13, 2005
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
Borjal v. C.A., 301 SCRA 1(1999)
Baguio Midland Courier v. CA, G.R. No. 107566, November 25, 2004
Freedom of Expression and the Administration of Justice
Cabansag vs. Fernandez, 102 Phil. 152
People vs. Alarcon, 69 Phil. 265 (1939)
In Re Ramon Tulfo, AM 90-4-1545-0, April 17, 1990
Nestle Phils. vs. Sanchez, 154 SCRA 542 (1987)
In Re Atty. Emil Jurado AM 90-5-2373 July 12, 1990

Freedom of Expression, Movie Censorship, Obscenity and the Right to Privacy

Gonzales vs. Kalaw Katikbak, 137 SCRA 356 (1985)
Lagunzad vs. Sotto, Vda. De Gonzales 92 SCRA 476 (1979)
Ayer Productions vs. Judge Capulong, 160 SCRA 861 (1988)
KMU v. Director General, G.R. No. 167798, April 19, 2006
MTRCB v. ABS-CBN, G.R. No. 155282, January 17, 2005
Reno v. ACLU, June 26, 1997, D-96-511
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
Fernando v. Court of Appeals. G.R. No. 159751 December 6, 2006
Radio Broadcasts
Eastern Broadcasting Corp. (DYRE) vs. Dans, 137 SCRA 247 (1985)

Francisco v Chavez, GR 169838 Aprul 25, 2006

Osmena v Comelec 268 SCRA 447
Social Weather Stations Inc., v Comelec, May 5, 2001
Hing v Choachuy GR 179736 June 26, 2013

_________________________________________________________________

XIX. FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY

BP Blg. 880 (Public Assembly Act of 1985)

Primicias vs. Fugoso, 80 Phil. 71 (1948)
Navarro vs. Villegas, 31 SCRA 730 (1970)
Ignacio vs. Ela, 99 Phil. 346 (1956)
J.B.I. Reyes vs. Bagatsing , 125 SCRA 553 (1983)
Ruiz vs. Gordon, 126 SCRA 233 (1983)
Malabanan vs. Ramento, 129 SCRA 359 (1984)
Arreza vs. GAUF, 137 SCRA 94 (1985)
German vs. Barangan, 135 SCRA 514 (1985)
Acosta v CA and CSC GR 132088 Jun 28, 2000
Bayan v. Ermita, G.R. No. 169848, April 25, 2006

______________________________________________________________

XX. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

Art. III, Sec. 7

Baldoza vs. Dimaano, 71 SCRA 14 (1976)
Tanada vs. Tuvera, supra
Valmonte vs. Belmonte, 170 SCRA 256 (1989)
Legaspi vs. CSC, 150 SCRA 530 (1987)
Garcia vs. BOI, 177 SCRA 374 (1989)
Request for copy of 2008 SALN and Personal data Sheet or CV of Justices of Supreme Court
And Officers and employees of the Judiciary, June 13, 2012
Chaves v PCGG, 299 SCRA 744

_______________________________________________________________

XXI. FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION

Art. III, Sec. 8

Art. IX, Sec. 2 (5)
Art. XIII, Sec. 3, par.2
Occena vs. COMELEC, 127 SCRA 404 (1985)
In re Edillon, 84 SCRA (1979)
 12

Rotary Int’l v. Rotary Club, 481 U.S. 537 (1987)

_______________________________________________________________
XXII. FREEDOM OF RELIGION

Art. III, Sec. 5

NonEstablishment Clause
Operation of Secretarian schools
Art. XIV, Sec. 4(2)
Religions instruction in Public schools
Art. XIVSec. 3(3)
Civil Code, Art. 359(1)
Anti- evolution laws
Epperson vs. Arkansas, 33 U. S. 27 (1968)

Prayer and Bible reading in public schools

Engel vs. Vitale, 370 U. S. 421 (1962)
Abington Schools Dist. vs. Schempp, 374 U. S. 203 (1973)
Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980)
Tax exemption
Art. VI, Sec. 28 (3)
Public aid to religion
Art. VI, Sec. 29 (2)
Aglipay vs. Ruiz, 64 Phil. 201 (1937)
Mueller v. Allen, 463 U.S. 388 (1983)
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 [1971]
Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 [1985]).
Islamic Da’wah Counsil v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 153888, July 9, 2003
Intramural religious disputes
Fonacier vs. CA, 96 Phil. 417 (1955)
Free Exercise Clause
Estrada v. Escritor, A.M. No. P-02-1651. June 22, 2006
Flag salute
West Va Board of Education vs. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 (1943)
Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent (March 1, 1993)
Freedom to propagate religious doctrines
American Bible Society vs. City of Manila , 181 Phil. 386 (1957)
Swaggart Ministries v. Cal Bd. Of Equalization, 493 U.S. 378 (1990)
Exemption from Union shop
Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers Union , 59 SCRA 54 (1974)
Disqualification for local government officials
Pamil vs. Teleron , 86 SCRA 413 (1978)
Religious Test
Torcaso vs. Watkins 367 U.S. 488 (1961)

____________________________________________________________

XIII. LIBERTY OF ABODE AND TRAVEL

Art. III, Sec. 6

Salonga vs. Hermosa, 97 SCRA 121 (1989)
Caunca vs. Salazar, 82 Phil. 851 (1940)
Manotok vs. CA. 142 SCRA 149 (1986)
Marcos vs. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668 (1989)
Silverio vs. CA, G.R. no. 94284 April 8, 1991
Lorenzo v. Director of Health, 50 Phil 595

Readings

1. Is There Religious Apartheid in the Public Service?*

By Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno Supreme Court

2. WHEN SHOULD MIRANDA WARNINGS BE ADMINISTERED? Pacifico Agabin

3. PRIMER ON THE WRIT OF HABEAS DATA By Atty. Neri Javier Colmenares

Nothing follows
13