How To Negociate With Canada
How To Negociate With Canada
How To Negociate With Canada
This section is an excerpt from the book “Negotiating International Business - The Negotiator’s Reference Guide
to 50 Countries Around the World” by Lothar Katz. It has been updated with inputs from readers and others, most
recently in March 2008.
Most Canadian businesspeople, especially those among younger generations, are experienced in
interacting and doing business with visitors from other cultures. They often take a genuine interest
in other countries and are usually open-minded rather than forcing their ways upon you.
Canada’s heterogeneous population is composed of the English-speaking majority (Anglo-Cana-
dians or Anglophones representing almost 60 percent), and the French-speaking minority (French-
Canadians or Francophones, around 23 percent), most of whom live in the Quebec province. It is
essential to be aware of and respect the significant cultural and language differences between them.
There are also sizeable groups who have emigrated from other countries, including many of Asian
or Arab heritages. Many of them live in Toronto or Vancouver. The information provided in this sec-
tion pertains mostly to Anglo- and French-Canadians. In addition, it is important to recognize the
many unique characteristics that make the country distinct from the United States.
Style differences across Canada’s population can still be pronounced in smaller cities and rural ar-
eas. Western Canadians are usually open to doing business with people from many different coun-
tries and cultures, while people in Atlantic Canada can appear regionally focused and somewhat
closed-minded. The pace of business may be the fastest around Toronto and Ottawa.
Negotiation
Attitudes and Styles – To Canadians, negotiating is usually a joint problem-solving process. With
French-Canadians, however, it may mean engaging in a somewhat more aggressive debate aimed
at reaching a mutually agreeable solution. While the buyer is in a superior position, both sides in a
business deal own the responsibility to reach agreement. They may focus equally on near-term and
long-term benefits. The primary negotiation style is cooperative and people may be open to com-
promising if viewed helpful in order to move the negotiation forward. Since Canadians believe in
the concept of win-win, they expect you to reciprocate their respect and trust. They are often very
pragmatic and usually find compromises both sides can live with. While the negotiation exchange
may include conflicts, you should keep a positive attitude and show willingness to work with the
other side in an effort to reach agreement.
Should a dispute arise at any stage of a negotiation, you might be able to reach resolution by show-
ing willingness to compromise and appealing to your counterparts’ fairness.
Sharing of Information – Canadian negotiators usually spend time, sometimes a lot of it, gather-
ing information and discussing details before the bargaining stage of a negotiation can begin. They
may share a lot of information as a way to build trust. It can be very counterproductive to appear
as if you are hiding facts from your Canadian counterparts. However, they will usually accept it if
you state openly that you do not want to share certain information. They value information that is
straightforward and to the point. Do not provide misleading information as your counterparts will
likely consider this unfair and may try to ‘get even.’
Canadians are generally suspicious of hype and exaggerations and may respond negatively to a
‘hard sell’ approach that might be effective in the United States.
Bargaining – Canadians are not overly fond of bargaining and dislike haggling. They can be tough
negotiators but are usually less aggressive than Americans may be. Appearing confident and asser-
tive is essential, though, since facing an apparently insecure counterpart may encourage Canadians
to negotiate harder. State your position clearly and be willing to push for it as needed.
Negotiators in Canada may take firm positions at the beginning of the bargaining process. Once you
convince them that you are intent on holding your own, they may become more willing to make
concessions. However, prices rarely move by more than 10 to 20 percent between initial offer and
final agreement.
Most people in this country expect to negotiate ‘in good faith.’ However, they may occasionally
use deceptive negotiation techniques such as telling lies and sending fake non-verbal messages,
pretending to be disinterested in the whole deal or in single concessions, misrepresenting an item’s
value, or making false demands and concessions. Do not lie at or otherwise grossly mislead your
counterparts, as doing so might damage or even destroy business relationships. Since ‘good cop,
bad cop’ requires strong alignment between the players, only experienced negotiators who have
spent time practicing the tactic may be using it. Carefully orchestrated, it may be effective in your
own negotiation approach. Businesspeople may claim limited authority, stating that they have to
ask for their manager’s approval. This could be a tactic or the truth.
Canadian negotiators may use pressure techniques that include opening with their best offer, show-
ing intransigence, making final or expiring offers, or nibbling. When using similar tactics yourself,
clearly explain your offer and avoid being aggressive. Avoid making decreasing offers, as they will
likely be viewed as inappropriate and offensive. Silence can sometimes be effective as a way to con-
vey displeasure. Be careful when attempting to create time pressure. Although it can be very effec-
tive since the Canadians’ sense of urgency usually works against them, their level of interest could
drop and they might start considering alternatives to the deal at hand. Persistence is important,
though, and you will frequently find your counterparts exploring all options to bring the negotia-
tion to a successful close as quickly as they can.
Decision Making – Canadian companies are usually not overly hierarchical. Nevertheless, they
usually have extensive policies and processes that may affect decision making. They are almost al-
ways followed. Decision makers are usually individuals who may or may not consult with others in
the group or organization. Managers are expected to accept responsibility for their own as well as
their employees’ actions. Decision-making authority is often delegated to lower levels in the hierar-
chy and may not require any further approval from others. Generally, the size of a deal determines
how high in the organization you need to go. Once the bargaining process has concluded, decisions
are often made quickly.
When making decisions, businesspeople may apply universal principles rather than considering
the specific situation. This is especially true for French-Canadians. Empirical evidence and other
objective facts weigh much more strongly than personal feelings and experiences do. Canadians are
medium risk takers who are often a bit more cautious than Americans may be.
Women in Business
While women enjoy similar rights as men, many of them are still struggling to attain positions of
similar income and authority. Nonetheless, Canadian women expect to be treated seriously and re-
spectfully. A visiting businesswoman should have few problems in the country.
www.NegIntBiz.com