Hummingbir
Hummingbir
Hummingbir
UJJWAL VASISHT
61910552
ANALYSIS
A. Customer Interest
This will largely consider the acceptability of the product as obtained by the MRF
(Market Research Foundation) appointed by Techsonic. It will be based on the focus
group reviews, interview responses, telephonic acceptance, etc. Moreover, it should draw
in the past record of Techsonic being one of the favorable brands for the customers.
a. Project 901 –
i. It was a clear winner
ii. High Uniqueness
iii. High purchase likeliness
iv. In line with past reputation of Techsonic
v. Highest intention to buy (Compared to LCR 1984)
b. VHF
i. Purchase intention as a replacement for an older unit
ii. 42% Hummingbird customers owned CB radio, can capture those
customers easily
iii. Introduction to a new product line
iv. Fragmented market players, hence can build a brand extension
v. Boat shows, Fishing Tournaments good advertising opportunity
c. Navigation Product
i. Considerable lack of conscious involvement in the category,
ii. A strong future potential
iii. GPS showing a greater utility but not cheap
VHF
Unit Sales 5,600 20,000 24,000 49,600
Revenue Projected $ 16.72 mn
Navigation Product
Unit Sales (GPS) 400 6,000 16,800
Unit Sales (LOCATOR) 4,000 12,000 5,600
Total Unit Sales 4,400 18,000 22,400 44,800
Revenue Projected $ 45.88 mn
C. Product Features
These are the features that bring in the value for the customer, and they are actually the
buying triggers. They should be in line with the customer needs, wants, market trends,
and competitive.
a. Project 901
i. Features are essential for purchase
ii. Additional features in the Deluxe model
iii. Easier to read and understand for customers
iv. Catching fish easier
b. VHF
i. Durable
ii. Good Battery
iii. Waterproof
iv. Dependable
c. Navigational Product
i. All weather functions
ii. High accuracy
iii. No interference
iv. Total Coverage
v. Appropriate pricing
D. Margins
This pertains to the Dealer’s margins being at least 15% in the distribution channels. That
will be one of the main drivers for the product to be sold by the dealers as well as them
pushing the products.
a. Project 901
i. Margins 15% - 40% depending on the channel
ii. The past products offered a greater margin to the dealers (42% and 46%,
ID-1 and ID-10 respectively)
b. VHF
i. 15% to 35% dealer margin for the mass merchants
ii. Troublesome channels
iii. Marine dealers are the major channel, weak relations with them
iv. Again, less margin than other products, won’t take another SKU off the
shelf for a lower margin
c. Navigational Product
i. 15% - 40% margin on GPS products
ii. Higher than those of competing LOCATOR products
VHF
Revenue 1,092,000 3,500,000 3,768,000 8,360,000
EBIT&A (294,600) 302,000 565,200 572,600
Navigation Product
GPS
Revenue 320,000 4,224,000 10,416,000 14,960,000
EBIT&A 34,688 1,351,680 3,749,760 5,136,128
Capital Expenses 764,000
Profit 4,372,128
LOCATOR
Revenue 1,800,000 4,500,000 1,680,000 7,980,000
EBIT&A 180,000 31,5000 50,400 545,400
Capital Expenses 301,600
Profit 243900
We see that the Navigational product has the highest profit potential, followed by
Project 901, and the VHF is an unprofitable product as per the market research forecast.
A strong caveat to consider while doing these calculation is that these projected sales
numbers are based on the respondents saying that they’ll buy Techsonic’s products.
This is a risk reward scenario as the buying intentions might not be the same once the
product comes into the market, there may be many market forces affecting the purchase
intention.
Hence, according to the above discussed factors, my analysis would be that both the
Project 901 and the Navigational Products should be launched.
Project 901 would further enhance the existing product line and consolidate Techsonic’s
presence and strength in the existing market, and the Navigational GPS product will
allow the company to foray into a new product field and expand on the range of products
offered.
________________________________________________________________________