School-Based Management in The Operation
School-Based Management in The Operation
School-Based Management in The Operation
School Administration
Overview
The logic behind school-based management originally lies in research from the
business world. Studies found that when the decision-making process was restructured
to include all levels of employees, worker satisfaction increased. Researchers found the
process especially appropriate for work places that were evolving, fast paced, and
required individuals to work together (Banicky, Rodney & Foss, 2000). The proliferation
of school-based management in schools has increased rapidly across the United States
and internationally in recent years.
Throughout the late 1980s, school based management was often seen as a political
reform to shift power from central entities to those within the school community.
Supporters hoped that the policy would engender a sense of community within those
who were closest to the school, driving improvement and creating a sense of
cooperation and ownership. Implementing the strategy of school-based management
was the end goal in driving change when the policy first gained popularity. Today
however, in the climate of accountability, SBM has increasingly come under question
regarding how it affects student achievement (Briggs & Wohlstetter, 2003).
Applications
Students
Increasing student achievement was not necessarily a primary goal of the original
school-based management models. Rather than aiming to enhance student
performance, school-based management was employed to shift the balance of decision-
making power from centralized authority to individual schools (Banicky, Rodney, &
Foss, 2000). Oswald (1995) states that some schools who implement SBM do not make
instruction their top priority. Thus, it is perhaps not surprising that research has not
found a persistent relationship that school-based management positively or negatively
affects student learning.
Teachers
While teachers are most interested in changes in curriculum and instruction, this is the
sphere in which district and state policymakers are often least willing to give up control
(Banicky, Rodney, & Foss, 2000). However, this area may be the one that stands to
gain the most from school-based management. Studies conducted examining the
relationship between teacher participation in decision-making and student outcomes
indicate that the two are positively correlated – when teachers are more involved in
decision-making, students tend to perform better (Banicky, Rodney, & Foss, 2000).
Administrators
School principals and other administrators may see their job descriptions undergo
enormous changes under school-based management. A school principal, in particular,
often plays a crucial role in the implementation's success. In school-based
management, the role of the school principal changes from supervisor and manager to
facilitator. The job function becomes much more collaborative and involves increased
interaction with staff, students and the community (Banicky, Rodney, & Foss, 2000).
Gaul, Underwood, and Fortune (1994) found that while school administrator's work
hours increased during and after implementation of school-based management,
administrators were most likely to embrace the...