I.

GENERAL CONCEPTS

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT (NI) 

CHECK - A bill of exchange drawn on a bank payable on demand. (Sec. 185). It is the most
common form of bill of exchange.

A written contract for the payment of money which complies with the requirements of
Sec. 1 of the NIL, which by its form and on its face, is intended as a substitute for money OTHER FORMS OF NI
and passes from hand to hand as money, so as to give the holder in due course (HDC) the 1. Certificate of deposit issued by banks, payable to the depositor or his order, or to
right to hold the instrument free from defenses available to prior parties. (Reviewer on
Commercial Law, Professors Sundiang and Aquino) bearer

Functions: (Bar Review Materials in Commercial Law, Jorge Miravite, 2002 ed.) 2. Trade acceptance
1. To supplement the currency of the government. 3. Bonds, which are in the nature of promissory notes
2. To substitute for money and increase the purchasing medium. 4. Drafts, which are bills of exchange drawn by one bank upon another
 Legal tender – That kind of money which the law compels a creditor to accept in payment 5. Debenture
of his debt when tendered by the debtor in the right amount.  All of these must comply with Sec. 1, NIL.
Note: A NI although intended to be a substitute for money, is not legal tender. However, a Note: Letters of credit are not negotiable because they are issued to a specified person.
check that has been cleared and credited to the account of the creditor shall be equivalent
to delivery to the creditor of cash. (Sec. 60, NCBA) Instances when a BE may be treated as a PN

Features: (Reviewer on Commercial Law, Professors Sundiang and Aquino)
a. The drawer and the drawee are the same person; or
1. Negotiability – That attribute or property whereby a bill or note or check may pass b. Drawee is a fictitious person; or
from hand to hand similar to money, so as to give the holder in due course the c. Drawee does not have the capacity to contract. (Sec. 130)
right to hold the instrument and to collect the sum payable for himself free from
d. Where the bill is drawn on a person who is legally absent;
defenses.

The essence of negotiability which characterizes a negotiable paper as a e. Where the bill is ambiguous (Sec. 17[e])
credit instrument lies in its freedom to circulate freely as a substitute for
money. (Firestone Tire vs. CA, 353 SCRA 601) Parties to a NI
2. Accumulation of Secondary Contracts – Secondary contracts are picked up and 1. Promissory Note
carried along with NI as they are negotiated from one person to another; or in the a. Maker – one who makes promise and signs the instrument
course of negotiation of negotiable instruments, a series of juridical ties between b. Payee – party to whom the promise is made or the instrument is payable.
the parties thereto arise either by law or by privity. 2. Bill of Exchange
 a. Drawer – one who gives the order to pay money to a third party
Applicability: b. Drawee – person to whom the bill is addressed and who is ordered to pay. He

General Rule: The provisions of the NIL are not applicable if the instrument involved is not
negotiable. becomes an acceptor when he indicates his willingness to pay the bill

Exception: In the case of Borromeo vs. Amancio Sun, 317 SCRA 176, the SC applied c. Payee – party in whose favor the bill is drawn or is payable.
Section 14 of the NIL by analogy in a case involving a Deed of Assignment of shares which
was signed in blank to facilitate future assignment of the same shares. The SC observed DISTINCTIONS
that the situation is similar to Section 14 where the blanks in an instrument may be filled up
by the holder, the signing in blank being with the assumed authority to do so.
 PROMISSORY BILL OF EXCHANGE
The NIL was enacted for the purpose of facilitating, not hindering or hampering
transactions in commercial paper. Thus, the statute should not be tampered with
NOTE
haphazardly or lightly. Nor should it be brushed aside in order to meet the necessities in a Unconditional promise Unconditional order
single case. (Michael Osmeña vs. Citibank, G.R. No. 141278, March 23, 2004 Callejo J.)
 Involves 2 parties Involves 3 parties
Kinds of NI
1. PROMISSORY NOTE (PN) Maker is primarily liable Drawer is only secondarily

An unconditional promise in writing by one person to another signed by the maker liable
engaging to pay on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in Only one presentment: Two presentments: for
money to order or to bearer. (Sec. 184)
for payment acceptance and for
payment
2. BILL OF EXCHANGE (BE)
 An unconditional order in writing addressed by one person to another, signed by the
person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay on demand or at a NEGOTIABLE NON-NEGOTIABLE
fixed or determinable future time a sum certain in money to order or to bearer. (Sec. 126)
INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENTS
Only NI are governed by Application of the NIL is only by
the NIL. analogy.
Transferable by Transferable only by
negotiationor by assignment
assignment.
 NEGOTIABLE NEGOTIABLE Solvency of debtor is Solvency of debtor is not
INSTRUMENT DOCUMENT OF TITLE in the sense guaranteed under Art.
Subject is money Subject is goods guaranteed by the 1628 of the NCC unless
indorsers because expressly stipulated.
Is itself the property The document is a mere they engage that the (Notes and Cases on
with value evidence of title – the things instrument will be Banks, Negotiable
of value being the goods accepted, paid or Instruments and other
mentioned in the document both and that they will Commercial Documents,
pay if the instrument Timoteo B. Aquino)
Has all the Does not have these is dishonored. (Notes
requisites of Sec. 1 requisites and Cases on Banks,
of NIL Negotiable
A holder of NI may Intermediate parties are not Instruments and other
run after the secondarily liable if the Commercial
secondary parties document is dishonored. Documents, Timoteo
for payment if B. Aquino)
dishonored by the
party primarily
liable.
A holder, if a holder A holder can never acquire
in due course, may rights to the document better
acquire rights over than his predecessors.
the instrument
better than his
predecessors.
A transferee can be a A transferee remains to be an
HDC if all the assignee and can never be a HDC
requirements are
complied with
A holder in due course All defenses available to prior
takes the NI free from parties may be raised against the
personal defenses last transferee

Requires clean title, Transferee acquires a

one that is free from derivative title only.
any infirmities in the (Notes and Cases on
instrument and Banks, Negotiable
defects of title of Instruments and other
prior transferors. Commercial
(Notes and Cases Documents, Timoteo
on Banks, B. Aquino) BILLOF EXCHANGE CHECK
Negotiable
Instruments and Not necessarily It is necessary that a
other Commercial drawn on a deposit. check be drawn on a bank
Documents, The drawee need not deposit. Otherwise, there
Timoteo B. Aquino) be a bank would be fraud.
 Death of a drawer of a Death of the drawer of a 
BOE, with the check, with the knowledge Determination of negotiability:
knowledge of the bank, of the bank, revokes the a. Whole instrument
does not revoke the authority of the banker to b. What appears on the face of the
authority of the drawee pay. instrument c. Requisites enumerated in
to pay.
Sec.1 of the NIL
May be presented for Must be presented for
d. Should contain words or terms of negotiability. (Gopenco, Commercial Law Bar
payment within payment within a
reasonable time after its reasonable time after Reviewer, cited in Aquino, p. 23)
last negotiation. its issue.

In determining the negotiability of an instrument, the instrument in its entirety
May be payable on Always payable on and by what appears on its face must be considered. It must comply with the
demand or at a fixed or demand requirements of Sec. 1 of the NIL. (Caltex Phils. v. CA, 212 SCRA 448)
determinable future time

NEGOTIABLE NEGOTIABLE The acceptance of a bill of exchange is not important in the determination of its
INSTRUMENT WAREHOUSE negotiability. The nature of acceptance is important only on the determination of
RECEIPT the kind of liabilities of the parties involved (PBCOM vs. Aruego, 102 SCRA 530)
If originally payable to If payable to bearer, it will
bearer, it will always be converted into a
remain so payable receipt deliverable to REQUISITES OF NEGOTIABILITY
regardless of manner of order, if indorsed a. It must be writing and signed by the maker or drawer

indorsement. specially. Any kind of material that substitutes paper is sufficient.

A holder in due course The indorsee, even if With respect to the signature, it is enough that what the maker or drawer affixed
may obtain title better holder in due course, shows his intent to authenticate the writing. (Notes and Cases on Banks,
than that of the one who obtains only such title as Negotiable Instruments and other Commercial Documents, Timoteo B. Aquino)
negotiated the instrument the person who caused b. Unconditional Promise or Order to pay a sum certain in
to him. the deposit had over the money Unconditional promise or order
goods. 
Where the promise or order is made to depend on a contingent event, it is
conditional, and the instrument involved is non-negotiable. The happening of the
event does not cure the defect.
ASSIGNMENT NEGOTIATION 
The unconditional nature of the promise or order is not affected by:
Pertains to contracts in Pertains to NI a) An indication of a particular fund out of which reimbursement is to be made, or
general a particular account to be debited with the amount; or
Holder takes the Holder in due course b) A statement of the transaction which gives rise to the instrument
instrument subject to the takes it free from personal 
defenses obtaining defenses available among Where the promise or order is subject to the terms and conditions of the
among the original the parties transaction stated, the instrument is rendered non-negotiable. The NI must be
parties
burdened with the terms and conditions of that agreement to destroy its
negotiability. (Cesar Villanueva, Commercial Law Review, 2004 ed.)
Governed by the Civil Governed by the NIL 
Code But an order or promise to pay out of a particular fund is NOT unconditional. (Sec. 3)

II. NEGOTIABILITY FUND FOR REIMBURSEMENT PARTICULAR FUND FOR PAYMENT


Form of NI: (Sec. 1) Key: WUPOA
1. Must be in Writing and signed by the maker or drawer; Drawee pays the payee from his There is only one act- the drawee pays directly
2. Must contain an Unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in own funds; afterwards, the from the particular fund indicated. Payment is
money; drawee pays himself from the subject to the condition that the fund is
particular fund indicated. sufficient.
3. Must be Payable on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time;
Particular fund indicated is NOT Particular fund indicated is the direct source of
4. Must be payable to Order or to bearer; and the direct source of payment but payment.
5. When the instrument is addressed to a drawee, he must be named or only the source of
otherwise indicated therein with reasonable certainty. reimbursement.
 EXTENSION CLAUSE EXTENSION UNDER SEC. 120(f)
Postal money orders are not negotiable instruments. Some of the restrictions imposed by
postal laws and regulations are inconsistent with the character of negotiable instruments. (Phil. Stated on the face of the Agreement binding the holder;
Education Co. vs. Soriano, 39 SCRA 587)

instrument a. To extend the time of payment or
Treasury warrants are non-negotiable because there is an indication of the fund as the source of b. Postpone the holder’s right to enforce
payment of the disbursement. (Metrobank vs. CA, 194 SCRA 169)
the instrument
Payable in sum certain in money Parties are bound because Binds the person secondarily liable

An instrument is still negotiable although the amount to be paid is expressed in currency
that is not legal tender so long as it is expressed in money. (PNB vs. Zulueta, 101 Phil they took the instrument (and therefore cannot be discharged
1071, Sec.6 (e)). knowing that there is an from liabilities if:

The certainty is however not affected although to be paid: extension clause a. He consents or
a. With interest; or b. Right of recourse is expressly
b. By stated installments; or reserved. (Notes and Cases on Banks,
c. By stated installments with an acceleration clause; Negotiable Instruments and other
d. With exchange; or Commercial Documents, Timoteo B.
e. With cost of collection or attorney’s fees. (Sec. 2) Aquino)

The dates of each installment must be fixed or at least determinable and the amount to be paid
for each installment.

A sum is certain if the amount to be unconditionally paid by the maker or drawee can
be determined on the face of the instrument and is not affected by the fact that the exact c. Payable on Demand or at fixed or determinable future time
amount is arrived at only after a mathematical computation. (Notes and Cases on Banks,
Negotiable Instruments and other Commercial Documents, Timoteo B. Aquino)
PAYABLE AT A FIXED OR
ACCELERATION INSECURITY EXTENSION PAYABLE ON DEMAND DETERMINABLE FUTURE TIME

CLAUSE CLAUSE CLAUSE a. Where expressed to be a. At a fixed period after date or

A clause that Provisions in the Clauses in the face payable on demand, at sight;
renders whole debt contract which of the instrument sight or on presentation; b. On or before a fixed or
due and allows the holder that extend the b. Where no period of determinable future time specified
demandable upon to accelerate maturity dates; payment is stated; therein; or
failure of obligor to payment if he a. At the option of c. Where issued, accepted, c. On or at a fixed period after the
comply with certain deems himself the holder; or indorsed after maturity occurrence of a specified event,
conditions. insecure. b. Extension to a (only as between which is certain to happen, though
further definite time immediate parties). (Sec. the time of happening is uncertain.
at the option of the 7) (Sec. 4)
maker or acceptor
c. Automa –tically 
If the day and the month, but not the year of payment is given, it is not negotiable due to its
upon or after a uncertainty. (Pandect of Commercial Law and Jurisprudence, Justice Jose Vitug, 1997 ed.)
specified act or
event. d. Payable to Order or to Bearer
Instrument is still Instrument is Instrument is still Payable to Order
negotiable rendered non- negotiable (Notes 
The instrument is payable to order where it is drawn payable to the order of a specified person, or
to him or his order. (Sec. 8)
negotiable and Cases on 
The payee must be named or otherwise indicated therein with reasonable certainty.
because the Banks, Negotiable 
The instrument may be made payable to the order of:
holder’s whim and Instruments and a. A payee who is not the maker, drawer or drawee
caprice prevail other Commercial b. The drawer or maker
without the fault Documents, c. The drawee
and control of the Timoteo B. Aquino) d. 2 or more payees jointly
maker e. One or some of several payees
f. The holder of an office for a time being
Payable to Bearer
 The instrument is payable to bearer:
a. When it is expressed to be so payable; or
b. When it is payable to a person named therein or to bearer; or
c. When it is payable to the order of a fictitious or non-existing person, and such fact
was known to the person making it so payable; or
d. When the name of the payee does not purport to be the name of any person; or
e. When the only or last indorsement is an indorsement in blank. (Sec. 9)

Note: An instrument originally payable to bearer can be negotiated by mere delivery even
if it is indorsed especially. If it is originally a BEARER instrument, it will always be a
BEARER instrument.
As opposed to an original order instrument becoming payable to bearer, if the same is
indorsed specially, it can NO LONGER be negotiated further by mere delivery, it has to be
indorsed.

A check that is payable to the order of cash is payable to bearer. Reason: The name of
the payee does not purport to be the name of any person. (Ang Tek Lian vs. CA, 87 Phil. III. INTERPRETATION OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (Sec. 17)
383)
a. Discrepancy between the amount in figures and that in words – the words prevail, but if
FICTITIOUS PAYEE RULE the words are ambiguous, reference will be made to the figures to fix the amount.

It is not necessary that the person referred to in the instrument is really non-existent b. Payment for interest is provided for – interest runs from the date of the instrument, if
or fictitious to make the instrument payable to bearer. The person to whose order the undated, from issue thereof.
instrument is made payable may in fact be existing but he is till fictitious or non-existent
under Sec. 9(c) of the NIL if the person making it so payable does not intend to pay the c. Instrument undated – consider date of issue.
specified persons. (Reviewer on Commercial Law, Professors Sundiang and Aquino) d. Conflict between written and printed provisions – written provisions prevail.
e. When the instrument is so ambiguous that there is doubt whether it is a bill or note, the
e. Identification of Drawee holder may treat it as either at his election;


Applicable only to a bill of exchange f. If one signs without indicating in what capacity he has affixed his signature, he is
A bill may be addressed to 2 or more drawees jointly whether they are partners or not but not to 2 or
more drawees in the alternative or in succession. (Sec. 128) considered an indorser.
g. If two or more persons sign “We promise to pay,” their liability is joint (each liable for his
OMISSIONS & ADDITONAL PROVISONS NOT part) but if they sign “I promise to pay,” the liability is solidary (each can be compelled
PROVISIONS THAT DO AFFECTING NEGOTIABILITY to comply with the entire obligation). (Sec. 17)
NOT AFFECT
NEGOTIABILITY IV. TRANSFER AND NEGOTIATION

a. It is not dated; GENERAL RULE: If some other act is INCIDENTS IN THE LIFE OF A NI (1 Agbayani, 1992 ed.)
b. It does not specify the required other than or in addition to a. Issue
value given or that any b. Negotiation
payment of money, the instrument is not c. Presentment for acceptance, in certain kinds of Bills of Exchange
value has been given; negotiable. (Sec. 5) d. Acceptance
c. It does not specify theEXCEPTIONS: NEGOTIABLE PA RIN h. Dishonor by non-acceptance
place where it is drawn IF i. Presentment for payment
or where it is payable; a. Authorizes the sale of collateral j. Dishonor by non-payment
d. It bears a seal; securities on default; k. Notice of dishonor
e. It designates a b. Authorizes confession of judgment l. Discharge (liability is not extinguished until it reaches this point)
particular kind of on default;
current money in which c. Waives the benefit of law intended MODES OF TRANSFER
payment is to be made. to protect the debtor; or (NOT a. Negotiation – the transfer of the instrument from one person to another so as to
(Sec. 6) LEGAL IN THE PHILIPPINES) constitute the transferee as holder thereof. (Sec.30)
d. Allows the creditor the option to b. Assignment – The transferee does not become a holder and he merely steps into the
require something in lieu of money. shoes of the transferor. Any defense available against the transferor is available against the
transferee. (Notes and Cases on Banks, Negotiable Instruments and other Commercial
Documents, Timoteo B. Aquino)

Assignment may be effected whether the instrument is negotiable or non-negotiable. E. RESTRICTIVE – An indorsement is restrictive, when it either:
(Sesbreño vs. CA, 222 SCRA 466)
a. Prohibits further negotiation of the instrument; or
HOW NEGOTIATION TAKES PLACE b. Constitutes the indorsee the agent of the indorser; or
a. Issuance – first delivery of the instrument complete in form to a person who takes it as
a holder. (Sec. 191) c. Vests the title in the indorsee in trust for or to the use of some other persons. But
 mere absence of words implying power to negotiate does not make an
Steps: indorsement restrictive. (Sec. 36)
1. Mechanical act of writing the instrument completely and in accordance F. QUALIFIED – Constitutes the indorser a mere assignor of the title to the instrument.
with the requirements of Section 1; and (Sec. 38)
2. The delivery of the complete instrument by the maker or drawer to the payee 
It is made by adding to the indoser's signature words like "sans recourse,” “without recourse",
or holder with the intention of giving effect to it. (The Law on Negotiable "indorser not holder", "at the indorser's own risk", etc.
Instruments with Documents of Title, Hector de Leon, 2000 ed.) G. JOINT – Indorsement payable to 2 or more persons (Sec. 41)
H. IRREGULAR – A person who, not otherwise a party to an instrument, places thereon
his signature in blank before delivery (Sec. 64)
b. Subsequent Negotiation 
Other rules on indorsement;
1. If payable to bearer, a negotiable instrument may be negotiated by
1. Negotiation is deemed prima facie to have been effected before the instrument is overdue
mere delivery.
except if the indorsement bears a date after the maturity of the instrument. (Sec. 45)
2. If payable to order, a NI may be negotiated by indorsement completed by
delivery 2. Presumed to have been made at the place where the instrument is dated except
Note: In both cases, delivery must be intended to give effect to the transfer of when the place is specified. (Sec. 46)
instrument. (Development Bank vs. Sima Wei, 219 SCRA 736)
c. Incomplete negotiation of order instrument 3. Where an instrument is payable to the order of 2 or more payees who are not partners, all
 must indorse unless authority is given to one. (Sec. 41)
Where the holder of an instrument payable to his order transfers it for value without
indorsing it, the transfer vests in the transferee such title as the transferor had therein and 4. Where a person is under obligation to indorse in a representative capacity, he may
he also acquires the right to have the indorsement of the transferor. But for the purpose of indorse in such terms as to negative personal liability. (Sec. 44)
determining whether the transferee is a holder in due course, the negotiation takes effect
as of the time when the indorsement is made. (Sec. 49) DI MAINTINDIHAN BASAHIN SA
LIBRO
RENEGOTIATION TO PRIOR PARTIES (Sec. 50)
d. Indorsement
 Legal transaction effected by the affixing one's signature at the:

Where an instrument is negotiated back to a prior party, such party may reissue and
a. Back of the instrument or further negotiate the same. But he is not entitled to enforce payment thereof against any
b. Upon a paper (allonge) attached thereto with or without additional words specifying the intervening party to whom he was personally liable. Reason: To avoid circuitousness of suits.
person to whom or to whose order the instrument is to be payable whereby one not only
transfers legal title to the paper transferred but likewise enters into an implied guaranty
STRIKING OUT INDORSEMENT
that the instrument will be duly paid (Sec. 31)
 
The holder may at any time strike out any indorsement which is not necessary to his title. The
GENERAL RULE: Indorsement must be of the entire instrument.
 indorser whose indorsement is struck out, and all indorsers subsequent to him, are thereby
EXCEPTION: Where instrument has been paid in part, it may be indorsed as to the residue. relieved from liability on the instrument. (Sec. 48)
(Sec. 32)

Kinds of Indorsement: CONSIDERATION FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSFER
A. SPECIAL – Specifies the person to whom or to whose order, the instrument is to 
Every NI is deemed prima facie to have been issued for a valuable consideration. Every
be payable (Sec. 34) person whose signature appears thereon is presumed to have become a party thereto for
value. (Sec. 24)
B. BLANK – Specifies no indorsee: 
What constitutes value:
1. Instrument becomes payable to bearer and may be negotiated by delivery (Sec.
34) a. An antecedent or pre-existing debt
2. May be converted to special indorsement by writing over the signature of indorser
b. Value previously given
in blank any contract consistent with character of indorsement (Sec. 35)
C. ABSOLUTE – One by which indorser binds himself to pay: c. Lien arising from contract or by operation of law. (Sec. 27)
1. Upon no other condition than failure of prior parties to do so;
2. Upon due notice to him of such failure.
D. CONDITIONAL – Right of the indorsee is made to depend on the happening of a
contingent event. Party required to pay may disregard the conditions. (Sec. 39)
 
V. HOLDERS EXCEPTIONS:
1. Where a holder’s title is defective or suspicious that would compel a reasonable man to
HOLDER investigate, it cannot be stated that the payee acquired the check without the knowledge

A payee or endorsee of a bill or note who is in possession of it or the bearer thereof. (Sec. 191) of said defect in the holder’s title and for this reason the presumption that it is a holder in
due course or that it acquired the instrument in good faith does not exist. (De Ocampo vs.
RIGHTS OF HOLDERS IN GENERAL Gatchalian, 3 SCRA 596)
2. Holder to whom cashier’s check is not indorsed in due course and negotiated for value
(Sec. 51) is not a holder in due course. (Mesina v. IAC)
a . May sue thereon in his own name  Rights of a holder not in due course:
b. Payment to him in due course discharges the instrument 1. It can enforce the instrument and sue under it in his own name.

The only disadvantage of a holder who is not a holder in due course is that the 2. Prior parties can avail against him any defense among these prior parties and prevent
negotiable instrument is subject to defenses as if it were non-negotiable. (Chan Wan vs. the said holder from collecting in whole or in part the amount stated in the instrument
Note: If there are no defenses, the distinction between a HDC and one who is not a HDC is
Tan Kim, 109 Phil. 706) immaterial. (Notes and Cases on Banks, Negotiable Instruments and other Commercial
Documents, Timoteo B. Aquino)

Holder In Due Course (HDC) SHELTER RULE



A holder who has taken the instrument under the following conditions: KEY: C O V I A holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a
party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former
1. Instrument is complete and regular upon its face; holder in respect of all prior parties to the latter. (Sec. 58)
2. Became a holder before it was overdue and without notice that it had been previously
dishonored; ACCOMMODATION
3. For value and in good faith; and
4. At the time he took it, he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in

A legal arrangement under which a person called the accommodation party, lends his name
and credit to another called the accommodated party, without any consideration.
the title of the person negotiating it. (Sec. 52)

Accommodation Party (AP)
Rights of a HDC: 
Requisites:
1. May sue on the instrument in his own name; 1. The accommodation party must sign as maker, drawer, acceptor, or indorser;
2. May receive payment and if payment is in due course, the instrument is discharged; 2. He must not receive value therefor; and
3. The purpose is to lend his name or credit. (Sec. 29)
3. Holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties and free from 4.
defenses available to parties among themselves; and Note: “without receiving value therefor,” means without receiving value by virtue of
4. May enforce payment of the instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties the instrument. (Clark vs. Sellner, 42 Phil. 384)
liable thereon. (Secs. 51 and 57) 
Effects: The person to whom the instrument thus executed is subsequently negotiated has a
right of recourse against the accommodation party in spite of the former’s knowledge that no

Every holder of a negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie a holder in due course. consideration passed between the accommodation and accommodated parties. (Sec. 29)
However, this presumption arises only in favor of a person who is a holder as defined in 
Rights & Legal Position:
Section 191 of the NIL. The weight of authority sustains the view that a payee may be a holder
in due course. Hence, the presumption that he is a prima facie holder in due course applies in 1. AP is generally regarded as a surety for the party accommodated;
his favor. (Cely Yang vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 138074, August 15, 2003) 2. When AP makes payment to holder of the note, he has the right to sue the
accommodated party for reimbursement. (Agro Conglomerates, Inc. vs. CA, 348
Holder Not In Due Course SCRA 450)

One who became a holder of an instrument without any, some or all of the requisites under
Sec. 52 of the NIL. 
Liability: Liable on the instrument to a holder for value notwithstanding such holder at the time
of the taking of the instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party. Hence, As regards,

With respect to demand instruments, if it is negotiated an unreasonable length of time after its th
issue, the holder is deemed not a holder in due course. (Sec.53) an AP, the 4 condition, i.e., lack of notice of infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the
persons negotiating it, has no application. (Stelco Marketing Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, 210
 SCRA 51)
GENERAL RULE: Failure to make inquiry is not evidence of bad faith.
 operate as an assignment of

Rights of APs as against each other: May demand contribution from his co-accommodation party
without first directing his action against the principal debtor provided: funds in the hands of the
a. He made the payment by virtue of judicial demand; or drawee available for the
b. The principal debtor is insolvent. payment thereof and the
drawee is not liable unless and

The relation between an accommodation party is, in effect, one of principal and surety – the until he accepts the same
accommodation party being the surety. It is a settled rule that a surety is bound equally and (Sec.127)
absolutely with the principal and is deemed an original promissory and debtor from the
beginning. The liability is immediate and direct. (Romeo Garcia vs. Dionisio Llamas, G.R.
No. 154127, December 8, 2003)

Well-entrenched is the rule that the consideration necessary to support a surety
obligation need not pass directly to the surety, a consideration need not pass directly to
the surety, a consideration moving to the principal alone being sufficient. (Spouses
Eduardo Evangelista vs. Mercator Finance Corp, G.R. No. 148864, August 21, 2003)

VII. PARTIES WHO ARE LIABLE

PRIMARY AND 2. Secondarily Liable (Sec. 61, 64 and 66, NIL)

SECONDARY WARRANTIES OF PARTIES
DRAWER GENERAL IRREGULAR INDORSER
LIABILITY OF PARTIES
Impose no direct obligation to
Makes the parties liable pay in the absence of breach INDORSER
to pay the sum certain in thereof. In case of breach, the
money stated in the person who breached the A. Admits the A. Warrants all A person, not
instrument. same may either be liable or
barred from asserting a existence of the subsequent HDC otherwise a party to
particular defense. payee and his - an instrument, places
capacity to a. That the his signature thereon
Conditioned on Does not require presentment indorse; in blank before
presentment and notice and notice of dishonor. instrument is delivery. (Sec. 64)
of dishonor (Campos and (Campos and Lopez-Campos, B. Engages that genuine and in
Lopez-Campos, Negotiable Instruments Law, the instrument all respect what A. If instrument
Negotiable Instruments 1994 ed.) will be it purports to be payable to the order
rd
Law, 1994 ed.) accepted or b. He has good of a 3 person, he is
1. Primarily Liable (Sec. 60 and 62, NIL) paid by the liable to the payee
party primarily title to it; and subsequent
liable; and c. All prior parties.
MAKER ACCEPTOR OR DRAWEE C. Engages that parties had B. If instrument
A. Engages to pay A. Engages to pay according capacity to
if the payable to order of
according to the tenor of to the tenor of his acceptance; contract
instrument is maker or drawer or to
the instrument; and B. Admits the existence of the
dishonored and d. The bearer, he is liable to
B. Admits the existence drawer, the genuineness of his
proper instrument is, at all parties subsequent
of the payee and his signature and his capacity and
proceedings are the time of to the maker or
capacity to indorse. authority to draw the
brought, he will endorse-ment, drawer.
instrument; and
C. Admits the existence of the pay to the party valid and C. If he signs for
payee and his capacity to entitled to be subsisting.
paid. accommo-dation of
indorse. B. Engages that the payee, he is liable
 the instrument to all parties
A bill of itself does not
will be accepted subsequent to the
or paid, or both, payee.
as the case may
 be, according to INDORSEMENT
its tenor; and
No secondary liability; but is There is secondary
C. If the
instrument is
dishonored and liable for breach of warranty liability, and warranties
necessary Warrants that he has no Warrants that the
proceedings on
dishonor be duly
taken, he will knowledge of any fact which instrument is, at the time
pay to the party would impair the validity of of his indorsement, valid
entitled to be the instrument or render it and subsisting
paid. valueless

3. Limited Liability (Sec. 65; Metropol Financing v. Sambok, 120 SCRA 864)
ORDER OF LIABILITY
QUALIFIED INDORSER PERSON NEGOTIATING 
There is no order of liability among the indorsers as against the holder. He is free to
choose to recover from any indorser in case of dishonor of the instrument. (Notes and
Cases on Banks, Negotiable Instruments and other Commercial Documents, Timoteo B.
BY DELIVERY Aquino)

As respect one another, indorsers are liable prima facie in the order in which they indorse unless the
contrary is proven (Sec.68)
Every person negotiating A. Warranties same as

GENERAL RULE: One whose signature does not appear on the instrument shall not be liable
thereon.
instrument by delivery or by those of qualified
a qualified endorsement indorsers; and 
EXCEPTIONS:
warrants that: B. Warranties extend to 1. The principal who signs through an agent is liable;
A. Instrument is genuine and immediate transferee only. 2. The forger is liable;
in all respects what it 3. One who indorses in a separate instrument (allonge) or where an acceptance is
purports to be; written on a separate paper is liable;
B. He has good title to it; 4. One who signs his assumed or trade name is liable; and
C. All prior parties had 5. A person negotiating by delivery (as in the case of a bearer instrument) is liable to his
immediate indorsee.
capacity to contract;
D. He has no knowledge of
VII. DEFENSES
any fact which would impair
the validity of the
REAL DEFENSES PERSONAL DEFENSES
instrument or render it
valueless. Those that attach to the Those which are available

instrument itself and are only against a person not a

available against all holders, holder in due course or a
whether in due course or subsequent holder who
not, but only by the parties stands in privity with him.
PERSON NEGOTIATING
entitled to raise them. (a.k.a (a.k.a. equitable defenses)
BY MERE DELIVERY OR GENERAL INDORSER absolute defenses)
BY QUALIFIED
 
Negotiation by a minor passes title to the instrument. (Sec.22). But the minor is not liable and the
defense is personal to him
1. Material Alteration;
2. Want of delivery of 1. Absence or failure of
consideration, partial or B. ULTRA VIRES ACTS
incomplete instrument; 
A real defense but the negotiation passes title to the instrument. (Sec. 22)
3. Duress amounting total; Note: A corporation cannot act as an accommodation party. The issuance or
to forgery; 2. Want of delivery of indorsement of negotiable instrument by a corporation without consideration and for the
4. Fraud in factum or complete instrument; accommodation of another is ultra vires. (Crisologo-Jose v. CA, 117 SCRA 594)
fraud in esse contractus; 3. Insertion of wrong date
5. Minority (available C. INCOMPLETE AND UNDELIVERED NI (Sec. 15)
in an instrument; 
If completed and negotiated without authority, not a valid contract against a person who has
to the minor only); 4. Filling up of blank signed before delivery of the contract even in the hands of HDC but subsequent indorsers are
6. Marriage in the case of a contrary to authority given liable. This is a real defense.
wife; or not within reasonable
7. Insanity where the insane time; D. INCOMPLETE BUT DELIVERED NI (Sec. 14)
person has a guardian 5. Fraud in inducement; 1. Holder has prima facie authority to fill up the instrument.
appointed by the court; 6. Acquisition of instrument 2. The instrument must be filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given and within
8. Ultra vires acts of by force, duress, or fear; reasonable time
a corporation 7. Acquisition of the 3. HDC may enforce the instrument as if filled up according to no. 2.
9. Want of authority instrument by unlawful
of agent; means;
10. Execution of instrument 8. Acquisition of the E. COMPLETE BUT UNDELIVERED NI (Sec. 16)
between public enemies; instrument for an illegal 1. Between immediate parties and those who are similarly situated, delivery must
11. Illegality – if declared consideration; be coupled with the intention of transferring title to the instrument.
void for any purpose 9. Negotiation in breach of 2. As to HDC, it is conclusively presumed that there was valid delivery; and
12. Forgery. faith; 3. As against an immediate party and remote party who is not a HDC, presumption of a
10. Negotiation under valid and intentional delivery is rebuttable.
circumstances that amount
to fraud;
11. Mistake;
F. FRAUD
12. Intoxication (according
to better authority); FRAUD IN FACTUM OR FRAUD IN ESSES
13. Ultra vires acts of FRAUD IN CONTRACTUS OR FRAUD
INDUCEMENT IN EXECUTION
corporations where the
corporation has the power The person who signs The person is induced to sign
to issue negotiable paper the instrument intends to an instrument not knowing its
but the issuance was not sign the same as a NI character as a bill or note
authorized for the but was induced by fraud
particular purpose for which
it was issued; G. ABSENCE OR FAILURE OF CONSIDERATION (Sec. 28)

Personal defense to the prejudiced party and available against any person not HDC.
14. Want of authority of
agent where he has H. PRESCRIPTION
apparent authority; 
Refers to extinctive prescription and may be raised even against a HDC. Under the Civil
15. Insanity where there is Code, the prescriptive period of an action based on a written contract is 10 years from accrual
of cause of action.
no notice of insanity on the
part of the one contracting
I. MATERIAL ALTERATION
with the insane person; and 
Any change in the instrument which affects or changes the liability of the parties in any way.
16. Illegality of contract 
Effects:
where the form or
consideration is illegal.
1. Alteration by a party – Avoids the instrument except as against the party who made,
authorized, or assented to the alteration and subsequent indorsers.
EFFECTS OF CERTAIN DEFENSES
A. MINORITY

However, if an altered instrument is negotiated to a HDC, he may enforce payment
thereof according to its original tenor regardless of whether the alteration was innocent
or fraudulent.

Note: Since no distinction is made, it does not matter whether it is favorable or

unfavorable to the party making the alteration. The intent of the law is to preserve the
integrity of the negotiable instruments.

2. Alteration by a stranger (spoliation)- the effect is the same as where the alteration is
made by a party which a HDC can recover on the original tenor of the instrument.
(Sec. 124)

Changes in the following constitute material alterations:
a. Date;
b. Sum payable, either for principal or interest;
c. Time or place of payment;
d. Number or relations of the parties;
e. Medium or currency in which payment is to be made;
f. That which adds a place of payment where no place of payment is specified; and
g. Any other change or addition which alters the effect of the instrument in any

respect. (Sec. 125) A serial number is an item which is not an essential
requisite for negotiability under Sec. 1, NIL, and which does not affect the rights of
the parties, hence its alteration is not material. (PNB vs. CA, 256 SCRA 491)