International Law As A Framework For Peace and Security in Cyberspace

International Law as a Framework for Peace and Security
in Cyberspace
A presentation at the EastWest Institute 7th Worldwide Security
Conference
Special Consultation “International Pathways to Cybersecurity”
February 17, 2010
by
Stein Schjolberg
Chief Judge
Moss tingrett Court
Norway
steins@mosstingrett.no
stein.schjolberg@cybercrimelaw.net
www.cybercrimelaw.net
Introduction
The rapid growth of cyberspace has created new opportunities for criminals in perpetrating
crime on a global level. These cyberthreats are global problems and they need a global
solution, involving all stakeholders. International Law should be the framework for peace and
security in cyberspace.
I have four topics I shall introduce to you for our discussions:
1. A Global Convention or Protocol on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime

2. Regional Organizations Forum
3. The International Criminal Court
4. The International Law Commission
1. A Global Convention or Protocol on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime
In order to reach for a common understanding of cybersecurity and cybercrime among

countries at all stages of economic development, a Convention or a Protocol at the United
Nations level should be established that includes solutions aimed at addressing the global
challenges. Crimes against peace and security of cyberspace should be protected under
international law. Serious crimes in cyberspace, such as massive and coordinated cyber
attacks against the critical information infrastructures, should be recognized under
international law, whether or not they are punishable under national law.
A proposal for a global Convention or a Protocol on the United Nations level on cybersecurity
and cybercrime may be based on a potential for consensus.
As a follow-up of the High Level Experts Group (HLEG) output I presented a paper ” A
Global Protocol on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime” at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, in November 2009.
With regard to the development of a model cybercrime legislation, this proposal for a Protocol
is based on a kind of “Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention light model” with some
additional provisions due to the development after 2001.
2. Regional organizations forum
The individual countries in each region around the world are members of the United
Nations. In addition, most of the countries are also members of regional organizations
within their region. But there is no “umbrella” organization or institution only for the
regional organizations.
Another recommendation from the HLEG was that a global conference for international or
regional organizations and relevant private industry should be established.
With regard to cybersecurity and cybercrime, the purpose for such a forum would be to
discuss, exchange information and approach a common understanding or coordination on
principles and standards for the global combat against cyberthreats. That includes massive
and coordinated cyber attacks against countries critical information infrastructure, and
against terrorist use of Internet. The regional organizations may then be able to assist and
make guidelines for their member countries within the regional traditions.
Several regional organizations have been identified, and at least 12 organizations are of
relevance for reaching a common understanding and coordination on principles and
standards for the global combat against cybercrime.
The strategy for solutions may unite the existing regional initiatives, and bring the
organizations together with the goal of proposing global solutions.
3. The International Criminal Court
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is the first ever permanent, treaty based, fully
independent, international criminal court established to promote the rule of law and ensure
that the gravest international crimes do not go unpunished whether or not they are
punishable under national law.
The Court do not replace national courts, the jurisdiction is only complementary to the
national criminal jurisdictions. It will investigate and prosecute if a State, party to the Rome
Statute, is unwilling or unable to prosecute. These States are obliged to cooperate fully in
the investigation and prosecution.
Article 5 limits the jurisdiction to the most serious crimes of concern to the international
community as a whole.
In the final diplomatic conference in Rome in 1998,1 other serious crimes such as terrorism
was discussed, but the conference regretted that no generally acceptable definition could be
agreed upon. The conference recognized that terrorist acts are serious crimes of concern to
the international community, and recommended that a review conference consider such
crimes with the view of their inclusion in the list within the jurisdiction of the Court.
Serious cybercrime, such as massive and coordinated cyber attacks against critical
information infrastructure and cyberterrorism, may be serious crimes of concern to the
international community. Such crimes should also be included in the Statute and be a part of
international law and prosecuted at the International Criminal Court, whether or not they are
punishable under national law.
The review conference is held in Kampala, Uganda, in April and May this year.
4. The International Law Commission
I have on January 29, 2010, sent the following letter to the United Nations International Law
Commission titled: “A United Nations Convention or Protocol on Cybersecurity and
Cybercrime.”
I will read to you the main parts of this letter:
“In order to reach for a global agreement on cybersecurity and cybercrime among countries at
all stages of economic development, the International Law Commission should consider a
draft code of a Convention or a Protocol. Peace and security of cyberspace should be a part of
the progressive development of international law.
It is now in my opinion, necessary to make the International Law Commission aware of the
need for a global response to the urgent cyberthreats and cyber attacks. These are new
developments in international law and pressing concerns of the international community as a
whole.
…………
In addition, the progressive developments of cyberthreats and transnational cyber attacks

against sovereign States, such as massive and coordinated attacks against critical information
infrastructures, will necessitate an urgent response for a global legal framework.
……….
I recommend that the Commission due to the urgency of the global challenges establish a
working group to handle this topic. This group may undertake preliminary work or help to
define the scope and direction.”
Thank you for your attention.
1
Final Act of the United Nations diplomatic conference of plenipotentiaries on the establishment of an
International Criminal Court, Rome July 17, 1998 (U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/10)

International Law As A Framework For Peace and Security in Cyberspace

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Law As A Framework For Peace and Security in Cyberspace

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Law As A Framework For Peace and Security in Cyberspace

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Law as a Framework for Peace and Security

I have four topics I shall introduce to you for our discussions:

1. A Global Convention or Protocol on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime

1. A Global Convention or Protocol on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime

In order to reach for a common understanding of cybersecurity and cybercrime among

2. Regional organizations forum

3. The International Criminal Court

4. The International Law Commission

I will read to you the main parts of this letter:

In addition, the progressive developments of cyberthreats and transnational cyber attacks

Thank you for your attention.

You might also like