Paper Outline For The Group Theme: Governance and Citizenship in The European Union: The Influence of Culture
Paper Outline For The Group Theme: Governance and Citizenship in The European Union: The Influence of Culture
Paper Outline For The Group Theme: Governance and Citizenship in The European Union: The Influence of Culture
gr Galinou 18
http://users.hol.gr/~kkouvel Athens 11741
Greece
Tel.: +30. (0) 977.227035
Fax: +30. (0) 1. 9220444
2
INTRODUCTION - CULTURE: A NEW RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION
European integration has historically been concerned with economic and commercial
benefits, but now the aim is to take it further, starting with a broader base capable of
involving citizens to a greater degree and strengthening the feeling of belonging to the
European Union, while respecting the diversity of national and regional traditions and
cultures.
This development is reflected in the Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty
signed on 7 February 1992), which designates new areas of Community responsibility
(education, youth, culture, etc.).
The main aim of this paper is to attempt to explore the features, capabilities and
prospects of EU’s Cultural Activities in order to present a different approach to the
institutional development of the European identity. It is also an attempt to spell out
some of the practical political implications of the cultural diversity of states within the
European Union framework.
Therefore, the main task of this attempt is to explore and access the cultural activities
of the European Union. The paper first examines the institutional framework for
cultural activities then, the analysis shall focus upon the specific policies ,
programmes and measures that promote the establishment of the so-called “European
Identity”, which will boost the European citizenship.
Increased awareness by Europeans about their common cultural heritage has led the
Member States to confer on the European Union a specific competence in the field of
cultural affairs. By including provisions for cultural policies in the Treaty on
European Union, the Member States demonstrated their resolve to mark a new stage
in the process of European integration", to "deepen the solidarity between their
peoples while respecting their history, their culture and their traditions", and to
"establish a citizenship common to nationals of their countries".
3
Cultural cooperation has therefore become a recognised aim of community action,
with an appropriate legal basis. It is also at the heart of the "ever closer union among
the peoples of Europe" that the Member States have resolved to construct.
Article 3 of the EC Treaty states that one of the objectives of Community action is to
make "a contribution to education and training of quality and to the flowering of the
cultures of the Member States".
Article 151 defined three major objectives for community action in the cultural field:1
The scope for Community action can be seen from the aims, areas of intervention,
type of action, and procedures for Community intervention and decision-making. The
specific aims and fields of intervention listed in Article 151 cover all aspects of
culture and open up a broad range of activities to Community action. On the other
hand, there are limits to the type of action specified, the instruments available and the
procedure to be followed.
In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, any act of harmonisation of legal and
regulatory provisions of the Member States is excluded from the scope of Article 151.
Paragraph 4 of Article 151 requires the Community to take cultural aspects into
account in its action under other provisions of the Treaty and to promote cultural
diversity. Culture must therefore also be taken into consideration when developing
Community action in its various forms, and especially when defining activities and
policies. More specifically, and by way of example, culture must contribute to
European citizenship, to personal and human development (through education), to
economic and social cohesion among Member States, to job creation in Europe, to
eliminating exclusion, and generally to enriching the quality of life in Europe.
4
Community action is based on cooperation and respects cultural diversity and the
principle of subsidiarity. Its role is to supplement and support Member States' action
in order to:
• improve the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of the
European peoples;
• conserve and safeguard cultural heritage of European significance;
• support cultural exchanges and artistic and literary creation.
In concrete terms, these new competencies were translated into the implementation of
three cultural programmes between 1996 and 1999.
KALEIDOSCOPE2
1) OBJECTIVE
5
2) POLICY ACTION3
• to encourage artistic and cultural creation in Europe in the fields of the arts,
the performing arts, visual or spatial arts, multimedia as a form of artistic
expression, and the applied arts, by means of exchanges and cultural
cooperation allowing greater public access to culture in Europe;
• to support innovative cultural projects of professional quality and of European
interest involving genuine European cooperation;
• to promote cultural exchanges in order to contribute to improved mutual
knowledge and thus promote the access of the least-favoured citizens to
culture;
• to encourage the development and projection of culture in Europe;
• to promote the sphere of the arts and culture to maximize the potential for job
creation in this sector, especially for young people.
ARIANE4
1) OBJECTIVE
2) POLICY ACTION5
Ariane’s action programme, for the period 1 January to 31 December 1998, had to
increase the knowledge and dissemination of literary works and the history of the
European peoples as well as access by the European citizen thereto, notably through
support for the translation of literary works, plays and reference works, through
support for cooperation projects on books and reading carried out in partnership as
well as through the improvement of the skills of professionals working in this field.
6
This programme would encourage cooperation at European level between the
Member States in the field of culture. It would support and supplement their action in
accordance with the principle of subsidiarity by contributing to the flowering of their
cultures while respecting their national and regional diversity. The aims of his
programme are as follows:
7
RAPHAEL6
1) OBJECTIVE
2) POLICY ACTION7
The Raphael programme in the field of cultural heritage established for the period
from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2000.
The programme encourages cooperation at European level between Member States in
the field of cultural heritage. It would support and supplement their action in
accordance with the principle of subsidiarity by contributing to the flowering of their
cultures, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time
bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore. To that end and in accordance with
the general aim set out above, the following are the specific objectives of the
programme:
8
• to encourage transnational cooperation in developing new technologies for
application in the various heritage categories and disciplines and in preserving
traditional cultural heritage trades and techniques;
• to have account taken of the heritage dimension in other EU programmes and
policies;
• to encourage cooperation with third countries and the relevant international
organisations.
In order to achieve the objectives set out in the preceding paragraph, the projects
developed pursuant to the programme would have to have a European dimension and
offer value-added compared with actions carried out in the Member States and meet
the following criteria:
9
European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where necessary, by appropriate
proposals.
1) OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this institution is to highlight the richness and diversity of
European cultures and the features they share and promote greater mutual
acquaintance between European Union citizens.
2) POLICY ACTION9
Under the Decision, a city will be chosen every year from 2005 onward as "European
Capital of Culture"; the procedure reads as follows (Article 2):
• four years before the event is due to begin, the Member State whose turn it is
will send a nomination or nominations, possibly accompanied by a
recommendation, to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission
and the Committee of the Regions;
• the Commission will each year form a selection panel which will issue a report
on the nomination or nominations. Parliament may forward an opinion to the
Commission not later than three months after receipt of the report;
• on a recommendation from the Commission drawn up in the light of
Parliament's opinion and of the selection panel's report, the Council will
designate a European Capital of Culture for the year in question.
10
• to highlight artistic movements and styles shared by Europeans which it has
inspired or to which it has made a significant contribution;
• to promote events involving people active in culture from other cities in
Member States of the European Union and leading to lasting cultural
cooperation, and to foster their movement within the European Union;
• to ensure the mobilisation and participation of large sections of the population;
• to encourage the reception of citizens of the European Union and reach as
wide an audience as possible by employing a multimedia, multilingual
approach;
• to promote dialogue between European cultures and those from other parts of
the world;
• to exploit the historic heritage, urban architecture and quality of life in the
city.
The initiative is also open to non-member countries in Europe. Any such country may
nominate one city and notify the nomination to Parliament, the Council, the
Commission and the Committee of the Regions. The Council, acting unanimously on
a recommendation from the Commission, will officially designate one of these
nominated cities as a European Capital of Culture for each year, bearing in mind the
desirability of four years' preparation time (Article 4).
Each city is to organise a programme of cultural events highlighting the city's own
culture and cultural heritage as well as its place in the common cultural heritage, and
involving people concerned with cultural activities from other European countries
with a view to establishing lasting cooperation (Article 5).
The Commission will be responsible for implementing this initiative. Each year it
must produce a report evaluating the results of the previous year's event, and present it
to the European Parliament, the Council and the Committee of the Regions. The
Commission may also make any proposals for the revision of the Decision which it
judges necessary for the smooth operation of the initiative and, in particular, with a
view to the future enlargement of the Union (Article 6).
11
PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE
Since the beginning of the year 2000, the "Culture 2000" framework programme has
replaced the previous actions over a period of 5years. (2000-2004). Equipped with
this new programme, the Union aims to implement a new approach to cultural action.
It seeks to encourage the creation of a cultural area common to Europeans and to
promote cooperation between cultural operators in order to develop intercultural
dialogue, knowledge about history and culture, the transnational dissemination of
culture, cultural diversity, artistic creation, the promotion of heritage and socio-
economic and social integration.
In addition to these aims and areas for action, it has been clearly stipulated that the
European Union must henceforth take cultural aspects into account in the definition
and implementation of its policies as a whole.
1) OBJECTIVE
The aim of the Culture 2000 programme, which will group together the old
"Raphaël", " Kaleidoscope " and " Ariane " programmes, is to encourage creative
activity and the knowledge and dissemination of the culture of the European peoples,
notably in the field of music, literature, the performing arts, the fixed and movable
heritage, and the new realms of culture, by fostering cooperation between cultural
organisations and operators and the cultural institutions of the Member States, and by
12
supporting measures which, by their European scope and character, promote the
spread of European culture both inside and outside the Union.
2) POLICY ACTION
For the European Union, the first framework programme (2000-2004) in support of
culture is an opportunity to implement a new approach to Community cultural action,
enabling it to respond to today's challenges and to meet the aspirations of both the
European public and the cultural sector itself.
The in-depth consultations undertaken by the Commission as part of the preparation
of the framework programme clarified the role and the place of culture in meeting the
great challenges now facing the European Union. A broad consensus emerged
between the Member States, Members of Parliament, the Commission, international
organisations (Council of Europe, UNESCO) and cultural organisations that the
concept of culture also covers popular culture, mass-produced culture, everyday
culture.
Culture is closely associated with the responses to major contemporary challenges
(Article 1):
Since the Treaty on European Union was signed, the Union has taken a number of
initiatives, through which it has attempted to:
• show that, apart from its achievements in the economic and monetary fields,
the European project extends to the entirety of European society and must
involve European citizens to a greater extent;
• start to integrate the cultural dimension into those of its decisions which have
an impact on culture;
• implement the three programmes encouraging cultural cooperation in the arts
(Kaleidoscope), literature (Ariane) and heritage (Raphael);
13
• help develop relations between culture, the culture industries and employment,
on the basis of the Commission's work showing the importance of cultural
activities in society and the potential for job creation that they represent.
The Culture 2000 programme also aims to enhance the common cultural area by
promoting cooperation between creative artists, cultural operators and the cultural
institutions of the Member States . The specific objectives listed in Article 1 would be
achieved by the following means:
Finally, for Action 3, priority will be given to the European Cities of Culture and to
European heritage laboratories – with particular attention being given to developing
14
projects situated in zones affected by natural catastrophes or damaged by
environmental pollution.
No trend has marked the last 50 years of European history as much as the as the crisis
of cultural identity which plagues Europe. The identity of Europe is like never before
a question of identity-as-particularity. The break-up of the Soviet Union and the
Eastern Bloc, the reunification of Germany, the ethnic conflicts in ex-Yugoslavia, the
growing trends of racism, xenophobia, and anti-Semitism in every European country
all to some degree appear as the signs of a problematisation of European identity and
a revaluation of the terms of cultural identity itself.
15
precedent and no rule. At the limit, the crisis faced by Europe at the very moment,
takes the form of a radical questioning of ethnic and racial conventions, political
affiliation, historical origins, linguistic norms, official jurisdiction concerning political
borders, constitutional authority, representative capacity, general defence, and law
enforcement.
However, the Union’s cultural identity in order to enhance the efforts for the
establishment of a European citizenship has to be based on the respect of the cultural
diversity of its countries and regions taking into consideration its common heritage
and the progress achieved so far. The main influence of the EU’s cultural programmes
and activities has been first, the establishment of a common platform for co-operation,
free from the constraints of intergovernmentalism and second, the creation of a human
network that shares values that unite Europeans.
It is also important to note, as the discourse on citizenship practice in the early 1990s
showed, that although the historical element of belonging was continuously
addressed, the focus was shifted from creating a feeling of belonging to establishing
the legal ties of belonging. Thus, with the removal of internal frontiers, further
measures are required in a number of other areas that have a bearing on cultural
activities, for example authors’ rights, cross-border television, and the free movement
of cultural assets and services. The Union should also contribute to a deeper
understanding of the culture and history of the European peoples. The conservation
and safeguarding of the cultural heritage of European significance will thus be a
focus for future action.
16
NOTES
1
Title XII, Article 151 of the EC Treaty.
2
European Parliament and Council Decision 719/96/EC of 29 March 1996 establishing a
programme to support artistic and cultural activities having a European dimension
(Kaleidoscope) for the period 1996-98. Amended by the following measure: Decision 477/99
of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 February 1999.
3
Official Journal L 99, 20.04.1996, Official Journal L 57, 05.03.1999.
4
Decision No 2085/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997
establishing a programme of support, including translation, in the field of books and reading
Ariane).Amended by the following measure: Decision 476/99/EC of the European Parliament
and the Council of 22 February 1999.
5
Official Journal L 291, 24.10.1997, Official Journal L 57, 05.03.1999.
6
Decision No 2228/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1997
establishing a Community action programme in the field of cultural heritage (the Raphael
programme).
7
Official Journal L 305, 08.11.1997.
8
Decision 1419/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999
establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2005
to 2019.
9
Official Journal L 166, 01.07.1999.
10
Commission Proposal COM(98) 266 final COD98/0165 Official Journal C 211, 07.07.1998
Amended Proposal COM(98) 673 final. Not yet published.
Opinion of the European Parliament First reading: Official Journal C 359, 23.11.1998 Second
reading: not yet published.
Common position of the Council Official Journal C 232, 19.08.1999.
17