Alexander Schubert - Silent Posts Score
Alexander Schubert - Silent Posts Score
Alexander Schubert - Silent Posts Score
SILENT POSTS
for everybody
2016
version
January 11, 2017 11:03 AM
SILENT POSTS
In “Silent Posts” there is a set of source pieces which serve as a starting point for the musi- Example Piece
cian to interpret and to make a new version of.
The piece can be played by a single musician or any number of players. Video Field Recoding Written Music Spoken
The musician(s) can both choose a source piece (provided by the composer) as a starting
Text Text
point or a version the another musician did before him. It is basically a concept where the
versions evolve, as in a family tree.
A musician interprets the previous version following a set of lose guidelines which are de-
scribed below. Aside from that he can also make a few changes in the piece based on a set
of tools (which are also described below in detail.
MATERIAL MOTIVATION
Both the source pieces and the new versions can consists of There are two main motivations behind this piece.
all possible media (audio/music/text/video/performance). First I wanted to make a piece that lets the performer bring in
It may be a piece starting with a video, then consisting of his/her individual approach and personality.
recorded music, than a performance, and so on. Secondly I found the idea interesting to see how a piece can
The physical material that is handed out is a (very simple) evolve and become something completely different, that I
score, which only indicates the lengths of the sections and the have no control over. I also thought it would be interesting to
names for them. Also a video recording of the piece / version see which road a piece takes and that it may become some-
is handed out. thing totally unforeseen.
The piece can explicitly be played by any musician / group of
musicians. It’s coming from a contemporary classical back-
ground - but can also be performed by a punk band or an
experimental electronic act.
INTERPRETATION
The musician can interpret the previous version basically in
any possible way. If a section is video the musician could for
example describe the video in words, make a new video, act
the video, or mimic the sound with the instrument.
Choose a source piece
The same is true for all other media forms as well.
or a version from another musician
The only limitation is that it should not be arbitrary. It should
be perceivable that you interpret a given section.
Interpret each section with your indi- Make a very simple score indicating
vidual appraoch (instrument / perfor- your changes in the piece
mance / etc)
VERSION HISTORY
Source Piece A
A B C E F A F A C E
A A B C D E F F A A B C D E F D E F
A B C B C B C D E F
A B C D E F A B C DEF A B C D E F
A C D B E F F E C D B A A B D C E F
A B C D E F G A B C G D E F A B C D E G F
TOOL BOX
If a musician / ensemble decides to make a new version based
on an existing version (or the original one) it will interpret the 3) Time-Stretch/Shorten
version as described above. Any section can be altered in length.
Apart from interpreting the music/sound/text/visuals the mu- 4) Rearranging
sician(s) can also make a few alterations - choosing from a Up to five sections or sets of sections can be moved from one
palette of tools described below: space in the piece to another.
1) Deleting 5) Inserting
Any number of sections can be deleted. Both a single section or Up to five elements may be inserted into the piece. The length
a set of sections. of the total duration of the new elements may not be longer than
one fourth of the resulting piece. If the new version is four min-
2) Duplicating utes long, then the total amount of new material may not exceed
Any number of sections can be repeated (once, twice or as 1 minute.
often as you like).
Both a single section or a set of sections can be repeated.
YOUR VERSION: TECH RIDER:
Simple Score
The above-said is true for the simple score you prepare as
well. Try to make it readable and understandable - it makes it
easier and more appealing for someone else to reinterpret your
version! I would suggest these guide lines:
–– Make it graphic in some way so that people can grasp what
you have done
–– Divide it into clear sections and sub-sections, or cues, or
movements or chapters. In any case: Make the organiza-
tion, the formal structure as clear as possible for the reader.
–– Use names / IDs for the individual sections.
–– Indicate how long the section in the piece are, so that the
reader can get an idea of the durations and time structure
–– Indicate the running time for the different parts in the piece.
–– Optional but good style: Indicate the original sections used
from the source piece or the version you started from. E.g.
if you use section C of the source piece in your piece you
can also call this section C, or C1 or how ever you like. This
is not mandatory - but it can be interesting in order to track
down the way the material has been used and evolved over
time.