The document discusses the audit process and procedures. It begins by covering the financial statement assertions made by management regarding recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. These assertions are categorized for classes of transactions/events and account balances.
It then discusses audit evidence, which is the information used to arrive at audit conclusions. Common audit procedures are listed, including confirmation, observation, inspection, calculation, analytical procedures, and inquiry.
Finally, it provides an overview of the typical audit process, including preliminary engagement activities, planning, considering internal controls, performing substantive tests, completing the audit, and issuing the report. It emphasizes the sequence may vary but should include these key activities.
The document discusses the audit process and procedures. It begins by covering the financial statement assertions made by management regarding recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. These assertions are categorized for classes of transactions/events and account balances.
It then discusses audit evidence, which is the information used to arrive at audit conclusions. Common audit procedures are listed, including confirmation, observation, inspection, calculation, analytical procedures, and inquiry.
Finally, it provides an overview of the typical audit process, including preliminary engagement activities, planning, considering internal controls, performing substantive tests, completing the audit, and issuing the report. It emphasizes the sequence may vary but should include these key activities.
The document discusses the audit process and procedures. It begins by covering the financial statement assertions made by management regarding recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. These assertions are categorized for classes of transactions/events and account balances.
It then discusses audit evidence, which is the information used to arrive at audit conclusions. Common audit procedures are listed, including confirmation, observation, inspection, calculation, analytical procedures, and inquiry.
Finally, it provides an overview of the typical audit process, including preliminary engagement activities, planning, considering internal controls, performing substantive tests, completing the audit, and issuing the report. It emphasizes the sequence may vary but should include these key activities.
The document discusses the audit process and procedures. It begins by covering the financial statement assertions made by management regarding recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. These assertions are categorized for classes of transactions/events and account balances.
It then discusses audit evidence, which is the information used to arrive at audit conclusions. Common audit procedures are listed, including confirmation, observation, inspection, calculation, analytical procedures, and inquiry.
Finally, it provides an overview of the typical audit process, including preliminary engagement activities, planning, considering internal controls, performing substantive tests, completing the audit, and issuing the report. It emphasizes the sequence may vary but should include these key activities.
Audit process – Preliminary engagement activities financial and other information are disclosed fairly and at appropriate amounts Financial statement audit generally begins with the financial statements of the client entity. because there would be no audit to perform without (2) Audit evidence these said financial statements Audit evidence: General approach to financial statement audit: refers to the information obtained by the auditor in requires consideration of the (1) financial statement arriving at the conclusions on which the audit opinion is assertions, (2) audit evidence, and (3) audit procedures actually based will either prove or disprove the validity of the client management’s assertions (1) Financial statement assertions at the conclusion of the audit: Management: auditor should carefully evaluate the audit responsible for the fair presentation of the financial evidence gathered in order to come up with statements that reflect the nature and operations of the an appropriate audit opinion client entity audit evidence comprises: implicitly or explicitly makes assertions regarding the 1. source documents and accounting records recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure underlying the financial statements of the various elements of the financial statements and 2. corroborating information related disclosures from other relevant sources Financial statement assertionsare categorized as follows: 1.assertions about classes of transactions and events for the period under audit - COCAC (3) Audit procedures 1. Completeness Auditor uses the financial statement assertions tin assessing the all transactions and events that should have risks by considering the different types of potential misstatements been recorded are recorded that may occur: 2. Occurrence thereby designing the audit procedures that are the transactions and events that have been responsive to the assessed risks recordedhave occurred and pertained to the Audit procedures selected should enable the auditor to gather entity sufficient appropriate audit evidence about some particular 3. Classification assertion: transactions and events have been recorded regardless of the audit procedures selected in the proper accounts 4. Accuracy Commonly-used audit procedures include: - COICAI amounts and other data relating to recorded 1. Confirmation: transactions and events have been recorded consists ofresponse to an inquiry to confirm or appropriately corroborate information contained in the accounting records 5. Cut-off Transactions and events have been recorded 2. Observation in the correct accounting period consists of looking at the process or procedurebeing performed by others 2.assertions about account balances at the period end under 3. Inspection audit: - ERoVaC involves examining the records, documents, or 1. Existence tangible assets of the entity being audited assets, liabilities, and equity interests exist 4. Calculation or computation 2. Rights and obligations consists of checking the arithmetical accuracy entity holds or controls the rights to assets of source documents and accounting records or and liabilitiesare obligations of the entity performing independent calculations 3. Valuation and allocation 5. Analytical procedures assets, liabilities, and equity interests are consists of the analysis of significant ratios and included in the financial statements at the trendsincluding the resulting investigation of appropriate amounts and any resulting valuation fluctuations andsome relationships that are or allocation adjustments are properly and inconsistent with other relevant information or appropriately recorded deviate from predicted amounts 4. Completeness 6. Inquiry all assets, liabilities, and equity interests consists of the seeking of information from that should have been recorded have been knowledgeable persons inside or outside the recorded entity being audited 3.assertions about presentation and disclosure - COCA 1. Completeness Audit process all disclosures that should have been included in Audit process: the financial statements have been included sequence of different audit activities 2. Occurrence and rights and obligations Emphasis and order of certain activities may vary depending disclosed events, transactions, and other upon a particular audit, but basically this process should matters have occurred and pertained to the include the following audit activities: - PACPCI entity 1. Preliminary engagement activities 3. Classification and understandability 2. Audit planning financial information has beenappropriately presented and described and disclosures are 3. Considering the internal control system clearly expressed 4. Performing substantive tests 5. Completing the audit Refusal of the prospective client’s management to permit this: willraise serious questions as to whether or not the 6. Issuing the audit report engagement will be accepted!
1.Preliminary engagement activities
Once permission of the client is obtained, the incoming auditor refer to PSA 300 should inquireinto matters that may affect the decision to undertaken to determine whether or not to accept the accept the engagement, which includes: audit engagement! 1. predecessor auditor’s understanding as to the reasons for the change of auditors Preliminary engagement activities: 2. any disagreement between the predecessor auditor performed (1) to know if the auditor is qualified to and the client handle the engagement and (2) to evaluate whether the 3. facts that might have bearing on the integrity of the financial statements are auditable or not prospective client’s management like fraud or non- in making this assessment, the auditor should compliance with laws and regulations consider the following: Code of Ethicsrequires the predecessor auditor to respond fully 1. his competence to the incoming auditor’s inquiry and advise the incoming auditor 2. his independence if there are any professional reasons why the engagement should 3. his ability to serve the client not be accepted. 4. integrity of the prospective client’s management Retention of existing clients: I. Auditor’s competence Clients should be evaluated(1) at least once a year or (2) upon Code of Ethics mandates that the auditors should not portray occurrence of major events such as changes in management, themselves as having expertise which they do not possess. directors, ownership, nature of client’s business, or other auditor should obtain a preliminary knowledge of the client’s changes that may affect the scope of the examination. business and industry to know if (1)he has the necessary In general: skills and the competence to handle the engagement or conditions which would have caused an accounting firm (2) whether such competence can be obtained before to reject a prospective client may also result or lead to the completion of the audit a decision of terminating an audit engagement competence can be acquired through a combination of education, training, and expertise Before performing any significant audit activities, PSA 300 requires the auditor to undertake the following preliminary II. Auditor’s independence engagement activities: - PEE Code of Ethics states that essential to the credibility of the 1. Performing procedures regarding the continuance of the auditor’s report is the concept of independence client relationship and the specific audit engagement auditor should consider if there are any threats to the 2. Evaluating compliance with ethical requirements, including audit team’s independence and objectivity, and if so, independence whether adequate safeguards can be established 3. Establishing an understanding of the terms of the III. Auditor’s ability to serve the client properly (PSA 220) engagement engagement should not be accepted if there are not Performing the preliminary engagement activities at the beginning enough qualified personnel to perform the audit of the current audit engagementassists the auditor in: - PI audit work should be assigned to personnel who have Planning the audit, and the appropriate capabilities, competence, and timeto Identifying areas that may affect the auditor’s ability to perform the audit engagement in accordance with the perform the audit engagement adversely professional standards there should be sufficient direction, supervision, and Engagement letter: review of work at all levels to provide reasonable Engagement letter: assurance that the firm’s standard of quality is maintained written contract between the auditor and the client in the performance of the engagement Engagement letter should be prepared: IV.Integrity of the prospective client’s management (PSA 220) after accepting the audit engagement auditors should conduct a background investigation of Engagement letter sets forth: - OMS-FFR the prospective client in order to minimize the likelihood 1. objective of the audit of financial statements of association with clients whose management lacks which is to express an opinion on them integrity 2. management’s responsibility for the fair presentation This task would involve: of the financial statements (1) Inquiringappropriate parties in the business community 3. scope of the audit inquiring the prospective client’s banker, legal counsel, 4. forms or any reports or other communication that the or underwriter to obtain information about the reputation auditor expects to issue of the prospective client 5. fact that there is an unavoidable risk that material misstatements may remain undiscovered (2) Communicating with the predecessor auditor because of the limitations of the audit Communication with the predecessor auditor is not only a matter 6. responsibility of the client to allow the auditor to have of courtesyto the predecessor auditor: unrestricted access to whatever records, information, it also allows the incoming auditor to obtain info. or documentation requested in connection with the about the prospective client to determine whether to audit accept or reject the engagement Engagement letter may also include: - BEAR But before the incoming auditor can contact the predecessor 1. billing arrangements auditor of the prospective client: 2. expectations of receiving management letter incoming auditor should obtain prospective client’s 3. arrangements concerning the involvement of others permissionto communicate with the predecessor auditor (experts, other auditors, internal auditors) because the Code of Ethics prevents an auditor from 4. request for the client to confirm the terms of the disclosing any information obtained about the client engagement without the client’s explicit permission Importance of the engagement letter: to avoid misunderstanding with respect to the audit engagement, and 4.Performing substantive tests to document and confirm the auditor’s acceptance of involves examining the documents and the evidence the appointment supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements
Using the information obtained in the audit planning and in the
Recurring audits: consideration of internal control system: auditor does not normally send new audit engagement auditor performs substantive tests to determine if the letter every year entity’s financial statements are presented fairly and The following factors may cause the auditor to send a new in accordance with the financial reporting standards engagement letter: - LIARS 1. legal requirements and other government agencies’ Extent of substantive tests is highly dependenton the results of the pronouncements auditor’s consideration of the internal control system. 2. indication that the client misunderstands the objective if the entity’s internal control system is functioning as and scope of the audit intended, the scope of the auditor’s substantive tests 3. any revised or special terms of the engagement can be reduced 4. recent change of senior management, BODs, or of if the entity’s internal control system cannot be relied ownership upon, the scope of the auditor’s substantive tests will 5. significant change in the nature or size of the client’s be expanded and will be more extensive business If the auditor decides not to send a new engagement letter: it may be appropriate for the auditor to remind the 5.Completing the audit client of the original arrangements involves performing additional audit procedures to complete the audit and to become satisfied that the Audit of components: evidence gathered is consistent with the auditor’s If the auditor of a parent entity is also the auditor of its report, after the auditor has completed testing the subsidiary, branch, or division (component): account balances in the financial statements auditor should consider the following factors in making Completing the audit procedures include: - RAPO a decision of whether to send a separate letter to the 1. Review of subsequent events and contingencies component: 2. Assessing the going concern assumption 1. who appoints the auditor of the component 3. Performing overall analytical procedures 2. whether a separate audit report is to be 4. Obtaining written representations from management issued on the component 3. legal requirements Auditor must have sufficient appropriate audit evidencein order 4. extent of work performed by other auditor to reach a conclusion about the fairness of the entity’s financial 5. degree of ownership by parent statements. 6. degree of independence of the component’s management 6.Issuing a report 2.Audit planning On the basis of audit evidence gathered and evaluated: In audit planning, auditor obtains sufficient understanding of the auditor forms a conclusion about the givenfinancial entity and its environment: statements to understand the transactions and events affecting this conclusion is communicated to various the financial statements, and interested users through an audit report to identify potential problems
A preliminary assessment of risk and materiality is made:
to develop an overall audit strategy, and to develop a detailed approach for the expected conduct and scope of the examination
3.Considering the internal control system
involves obtaining an understanding of the entity’s control systems and assessing the level of control risk
Control risk: risk that the client’s internal control may not prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial statements
Auditor considers the entity’s internal control system because
the condition of the entity’s internal controldirectly affects the reliability of the financial statements i.e. the stronger the internal control system, the more assurance it provides about the reliability of the entity’s financial statements
If auditor wants to assess control risk at less than high level:
sufficient appropriate audit evidence must be obtained to prove that the internal control is functioning as intended (i.e. effectively) and that it can be relied upon sufficient appropriate audit evidence can be obtained by performing tests of controls