Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Impact of Community-Based DOT On Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Impact of Community-Based DOT on Tuberculosis Treatment

Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis


Abstract

Background

Poor adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment can lead to prolonged infectivity and poor
treatment outcomes. Directly observed treatment (DOT) seeks to improve adherence to TB
treatment by observing patients while they take their anti-TB medication. Although community-
based DOT (CB-DOT) programs have been widely studied and promoted, their effectiveness has
been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to critical appraise and summarize evidence of the
effects of CB-DOT on TB treatment outcomes.

Methods

Studies published up to the end of February 2015 were identified from three major
international literature databases: Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and EMBASE. Unpublished data
from the grey literature were identified through Google and Google Scholar searches.

Results

Seventeen studies involving 12,839 pulmonary TB patients (PTB) in eight randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) and nine cohort studies from 12 countries met the criteria for inclusion in this
review and 14 studies were included in meta-analysis. Compared with clinic-based DOT, pooled
results of RCTs for all PTB cases (including smear-negative or -positive, new or retreated TB
cases) and smear-positive PTB cases indicated that CB-DOT promoted successful treatment
[pooled RRs (95%CIs): 1.11 (1.02–1.19) for all PTB cases and 1.11 (1.02–1.19) for smear-positive
PTB cases], and completed treatment [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 1.74(1.05, 2.90) for all PTB cases
and 2.22(1.16, 4.23) for smear-positive PTB cases], reduced death [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 0.44
(0.26–0.72) for all PTB cases and 0.39 (0.23–0.66) for smear-positive PTB cases], and transfer
out [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 0.37 (0.23–0.61) for all PTB cases and 0.42 (0.25–0.70) for smear-
positive PTB cases]. Pooled results of all studies (RCTs and cohort studies) with all PTB cases
demonstrated that CB-DOT promoted successful treatment [pooled RR (95%CI): 1.13 (1.03–
1.24)] and curative treatment [pooled RR (95%CI): 1.24 (1.04–1.48)] compared with self-
administered treatment.

Conclusions
CB-DOT did improved TB treatment outcomes according to the pooled results of included
studies in this review. Studies on strategies for implementation of patient-centered and
community-centered CB-DOT deserve further attention.

You might also like