Macky Mouse filed a complaint against Donald Rump for issuing a bad check. Mouse leased property to Rump, who paid with a check for PHP 500,000. However, when Mouse deposited the check it was dishonored as the account was closed. Mouse demanded payment from Rump, who refused. As a result, Mouse is charging Rump with violation of the Bouncing Checks Law.
Macky Mouse filed a complaint against Donald Rump for issuing a bad check. Mouse leased property to Rump, who paid with a check for PHP 500,000. However, when Mouse deposited the check it was dishonored as the account was closed. Mouse demanded payment from Rump, who refused. As a result, Mouse is charging Rump with violation of the Bouncing Checks Law.
Macky Mouse filed a complaint against Donald Rump for issuing a bad check. Mouse leased property to Rump, who paid with a check for PHP 500,000. However, when Mouse deposited the check it was dishonored as the account was closed. Mouse demanded payment from Rump, who refused. As a result, Mouse is charging Rump with violation of the Bouncing Checks Law.
Macky Mouse filed a complaint against Donald Rump for issuing a bad check. Mouse leased property to Rump, who paid with a check for PHP 500,000. However, when Mouse deposited the check it was dishonored as the account was closed. Mouse demanded payment from Rump, who refused. As a result, Mouse is charging Rump with violation of the Bouncing Checks Law.
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 4
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES)
Province of Leyte) S.S.
City of Tacloban ) x-----------------------x
COMPLAINT - A F F I D A V I T
I, MACKY M. MOUSE , of legal age, married, Filipino citizen and resident of Granada Subdivision, Tacloban City, Philippines after being sworn in accordance with law, hereby depose and state:
1. THAT, I am an owner of a parcel of land located in Hda. Wonderland, Tacloban city as
evidence by TCT no. T-66607 herein attached as annex “A”;
2. THAT, DONALD D. RUMP, a Filipino, single, legal age and a resident of Tacloban City, has leased the above mention property from me for a period of one year.
3. THAT, as compensation for the said lease Mr. RUMP has agreed to pay me in full the amount of five hundred thousand pesos (PHP 500,000) as evidence by the EastWest Check, which he tendered to me upon the signing of the lease agreement.
4. THAT, the above mentioned check is more particularly described as follows:
Bank: Metro Bank Incorporated
Check Amount: Five Hundred Thousand Pesos Only (PHP 500,000) Check no: 0092-394-09374 Account no: 109-23212-321-321-4 Date: January 17, 2018
5. THAT, at the time the said Respondent issued and delivered the said check to me, she made the assurance and representation that the said check is a good check and would be covered by sufficient funds when presented for payment;
6. THAT, when the above-mentioned check was deposited, the same was dishonored and returned by the bank on the ground that the same was drawn against a "CLOSED ACCOUNT." A true and faithful machine reproduction of the said check is hereto attached as Annex "A”;
7. THAT, I immediately notified said Respondent of the dishonor and return of the said check and demanded from her that she make good the said check within seven (7) days from receipt thereof. A true and faithful machine reproduction of my demand letter to her is hereto attached as Annex "B";
8. THAT, When said Respondent failed to heed my demands, I endorsed the said check to my legal counsel who immediately sent a formal demand letter through registered mail with return card on February 5, 2018, which was received by the said Respondent on February 14, 2018. As of date however, Respondent has unjustifiably ignored all these demands to pay the said account and/or to redeem the said returned check. A true and faithful machine reproduction of my demand letter to her is hereto attached as Annex "C";
9. I am therefore executing this Complaint-Affidavit in support of the charges for
Violation of Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 against the said Respondent, who may be served with subpoena and other processes of this Honorable Office at her last known address at Block 7, Lot 21, Harlington Road, Greensville Subdivision, Tacloban City, Philippines; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this March 1, 2018 at Tacloban City, Philippines.
MACKY MOUSE
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, this 1st day of March, 2019 by MACKY MOUSE who exhibited to me his Community Tax Certificate No. 167896 issued at Tacloban, Philippines on January 5, 2019. and that I am satisfied that she has voluntarily executed and understood the contents of his Complaint- Affidavit.
Office of the City Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines REGIONAL TRIAL COURT 6th Judicial Region Branch 43 Tacloban City -o0o-
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Plaintiff, Criminal Case No. 69-558 - versus - For: Estafa DONALD RUMP Accused, x--------------------x
INFORMATION
The undersigned, accuses DONALD D. RUMP of the crime of SWINDLING /
ESTAFA, committed as follows, to wit:
That on or about January 17, 2018, in the City of Tacloban, Province of Negros Occidental and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the said accused having entered into a contract of lease with the complaint, MACKY M. MOUSE, tendered unto the latter a EastWest Check with the Check no. 0092-394-09374 for the amount of Five Hundred Thousand Pesos Only (PHP 500,000) for compensation for the said lease agreement. The said accused did then and there, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously represented that the said check is a good check and would be covered by sufficient funds when presented for payment, however, when the above-mentioned check was deposited, the same was dishonored and returned by the bank on the ground that the same was drawn against a "CLOSED ACCOUNT." to the damage and prejudice of the complainant.
Contrary to law.
Tacloban City, Philippines, March 15, 2019.
SIMBA L. LION City Prosecutor Witnesses:
Bugs B. Bunny Kermit d. Frog
Witness Witness CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a preliminary investigation has been conducted in the above entitled-case, wherein the accused was given a chance to appear and that on the basis of the evidence presented there is reasonable ground to believe that the offense charged has been committed and the accused is probably guilty thereof.
