Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Office of the Court Administrator
SMlanila
OCA CIRCULAR NO. 213-2017
TO : ALL FAMILY COURTS AND CONCERNED REGIONAL
TRIAL COURTS.
SUBJECT: APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 02-2017 OF THE
COMMITTEE ON FAMILY COURTS AND JUVENILE
CONCERNS (RE: PROPOSED GUIDELINES AND
CLARIFICATION IN THE INTERPRETATION AND
APPLICATION OF PERTINENT PROVISIONS OF
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8552 [DOMESTIC ADOPTION ACT
OF 1998], REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8043 [THE INTER-
COUNTRY ADOPTION ACT OF 1995], REPUBLIC ACT
NO. 9523 [ACT REQUIRING CERTIFICATION OF THE
DSWD TO DECLARE A “CHILD LEGALLY AVAILABLE
FOR ADOPTION" AS PREREQUISITE FOR ADOPTION
PROCEEDINGS], AND ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER
NO. 02-6-02-SC [RULE ON ADOPTION], AS TO THE
REQUIRED DOCUMENTS IN ADOPTION)
For the information, guidance and strict compliance of all
Family Courts and concerned Regional Trial Courts, appended herein
as Annex “A” is the Committee on Family Courts and Juvenile
Concerns (CFCJC) Resolution No. 02-2017: “Proposed Guidelines and
Clarification in the Interpretation and Application of Pertinent
Provisions of Republic Act No. 8552 (Domestic Adoption Act of 1998),
Republic Act No. 8043 (The Inter-Country Adoption Act of 19950,
Republic Act No. 9523 (Act Requiring Certification of the DSWD to
Declare a ‘Child Legally Available For Adoption’ as Prerequisite For
Adoption Proceedings), and Administrative Matter No. 02-6-02-SC
(Rule On Adoption|, As to the Required Documents in Adoption.” The
resolution was approved during the meeting of the CFCJC and its
Technical Working Group on 14 July 2017.
23 October 2017
5
if —
j IDAS P. MARQUEZ
yurt AdministratorAnnex “A”
Supreme Court of the Philippines
Committee on Family Courts and Juvenile Concerns
Resolution No. 02-2017
PROPOSED GUIDELINES AND CLARIFICATION IN
THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF
PERTINENT PROVISIONS OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8552
(DOMESTIC ADOPTION ACT OF 1998), REPUBLIC ACT
NO. 8043 (THE INTER-COUNTRY ADOPTION ACT OF
1995), REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9523 (AN ACT REQUIRING
CERTIFICATION OF THE DSWD TO DECLARE A
“CHILD LEGALLY AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION” AS A
PREREQUISITE FOR ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS), AND
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER NO. 02-6-02-SC (RULE ON
ADOPTION), AS TO THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS IN
ADOPTION
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court, by Memorandum Order No. 20-2014
dated August 13, 2014, created the Committee on Family Courts and
Juvenile Concerns (CFCJC) with the mandate, among others, of “drafting a
plan for the organization of the family courts,” and “monitoring. the
implementation of the plan for the creation and organization of Family
Courts including identification of procedural rules and guidelines;”
WHEREAS, two consultation-workshops were conducted by the CFCJC in
a National Summit for Family Courts held on September 16 and 17, 2015
and National Summit for Regional Trial Courts Handling Family Court
Cases held on August 4 and 5, 2016, to determine and address issues
affecting Family Courts, particularly, among others, the jurisdiction of
Family Courts vis-a-vis first and second level regular courts, amendments to
the rules of procedure, issuance of guidelines in the implementation of a
uniform court procedure and the efficient handling of cases in the Family
Courts;”
WHEREAS, during the 2015 and 2016 National Summits, the participating
Regional Trial Court Judges, designated as Family Court Judges, as well as
Regional Trial Court Judges handling Family Court cases, arrived at a
consensus that there is an urgent need to revise or modify certain existing
guidelines or propose clarificatory guidelines to the Honorable Court
Administrator, to address specific concerns raised during the National
Summits, which will not require any amendment of the Rules of Court
or existing laws;Supreme Court of the Dhilippines
Committee on Family Courts and Juvenile Concerns
Resolution No. 02-2017
WHEREAS, some of the issues raised during the 2015 and 2016 National
Summits involve the application and interpretation of laws and the rule on
adoption;
NOW THEREFORE, the CFCIC hereby PROPOSES the following
guidelines for the consideration and approval of the Honorable Court
Administrator:
I. STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH REPUBLIC ACT NO.
9523 (AN ACT REQUIRING CERTIFICATION OF
THE DSWD TO DECLARE A “CHILD LEGALLY
AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION” AS A PREREQUISITE
FOR ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING
ABANDONED, SURRENDERED, OR NEGLECTED
CHILDREN)
Judges are enjoined to strictly comply with the provisions of Sec. 8 of
Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9523 and its Implementing Rules and Regulations,
requiring a Certification Declaring the Child Legally Available for Adoption
(CDCLAA) from the DSWD as primary evidence in a domestic adoption
proceeding, including the adoption of surrendered, abandoned, neglected,
and dependent children. The only exceptions are adoption proceedings
covered by subparagraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) of Section 4 of the Implementing
Rules and Regulations of R.A. No. 9523.
Judges are reminded of Section 10 of RA No. 9523, which states that
a violation of any provision of the said law is punishable as provided below
‘SEC. 10. Penalty. — The penalty of One Hundred Thousand Pesos
(P 100,000) to Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000) shalt be imposed
on any person, institution, or agency who shall place a child for adoption
without the certification that the child is legally available for adoption
ued by the DSWD. Any agency or institution found violating any
provision of this Act shall have its license to operate revoked without
prejudice to the criminal prosecution of its officers and employees.
Violation of any provision of this Act shall subject the government
official or employee concerned to appropriate administrative, civil and/or
criminal sanctions, including suspension and/or dismissal from the
government service and forfeiture of benefits.
JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED GUIDELINE:
This guideline will clarify that the CDCLAA required under
Section 8 of No. 9523 is also required in petitions for adoption of
2
13. Gerardo Lanuza, Jr. and Antonio o. Olbes, v. Bf Corporation, Shangri-la Properties, Inc., Alfredo c. Ramos, Rufo b. Colayco, Maximo g. Licauco III, And Benjamin c. Ramos, g.r. No. 174938, October 01, 2014