Design II Merged Revised PDF
Design II Merged Revised PDF
Design II Merged Revised PDF
ChE 407
CREDITS – 2, SUNDAYS AND
WEDNESDAYS AT 11 AM, ROOM 254
Process licensors
Engineering contractor/EPC/General
contractor (GC)
Package unit contractor
Vendors of equipment and machineries
Sub-contractors under engineering
contractors
Consultants and technical associates
Different Stages of Process Plant
Implementation and Parties involved
Stage Parties involved
Prefeasibility and Consultants (appointed often by
feasibility studies donors)
Process selection GC/EPC
Technical specification Technical associates
Design basis Consultants, technical associates,
GC/EPC
Job standards GC/EPC, process licensor
Basic engineering process licensor, GC/EPC
Detailed engineering process licensor, GC/EPC, equipment
vendor, package unit contractors
Cost engineering GC/EPC
Stage Parties involved
Engineering studies GC/EPC, equipment vendor,
package unit contractors
Planning, scheduling, GC/EPC
monitoring
Review and approval of Technical associates
engineering documents
Procurement GC/EPC, package unit
contractors
4. Ministry of
Technical
industry
Associates
5. Ministry of General
law Engineering
Contractor/EPC Technical
6. Regulatory advisers for
authorities donors
7. Special
cabinet
committee
A design engineer always looks for worst conditions and the design is
made to accommodate those conditions
Components of Design Basis
Geological data
Climatic conditions
Utility conditions
Structural design
Raw materials
Geological Data
Does the licensor proposal confirm the technology offered will meet all
performance objectives set forth?
What product yields/qualities are produced?
Is the technology flexible with regard to capacity turndown requirements
and potential feed impurities?
Is the technology commercially proven and reliable?
Where is it currently operating in facilities of similar service and capacity?
Have there been any historical problems? Is the technology mature,
improving, or a first-in-kind prototype?
Licensor Technology Selection
P & I diagrams
Plot plan
Start-up
Normal shut-down
etc.
Analytical data requirement and sample analysis frequency for
Start-up procedures.
Start-up procedures.
At the time of the incident, the plant had last been inspected
by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
in 1985. According to records obtained by the Associated
Press, OSHA cited the plant for improper storage of anhydrous
ammonia and fined it $30; OSHA could have imposed a fine
of as much as $1,000. OSHA also cited the plant for violations
of respiratory protection standards, but did not issue a fine.
OSHA officials said the facility was not on their "National
Emphasis Plan" for inspections, because it was not a
manufacturer, had no record of a major accident, and the
Environmental Protection Agency did not consider it a major
risk.
CSB (Chemical Safety Board) recommendation for OSHA
(Occupational Safety and Health Administration)
Develop and issue a Regional Emphasis Program for
Section (i) of the Explosives and Blasting Agent
standard, 29 CFR 1910.109(i), in appropriate regions
(such as Regions IV, VI, and VII) where fertilizer grade
ammonium nitrate facilities similar to the West
Fertilizer Company facility are prevalent. Establish a
minimum number of emphasis program inspections per
region for each fiscal year. Work with regional offices
to communicate information about the emphasis
program to potential inspection recipients.
PROCUREMENT FOR AN
ENGINEERING PROJECT
FUND
CLIENT
PROCESS
CONSULTANT LICENSOR
EPC
OR
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
SOME LARGE EPC FIRMS
• Bechtel USA
• China Communication Construction China
• TECHNIP France
• Saipem Italy
• Fluor Corp. USA
• Hyundi S. Korea
• Samsung S. Korea
• Chiyoda Japan
• KBR USA
• Jacobs Engg. USA
• Toyo Engg. Japan
• China has many more large EPC firms for different
sectors
ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION
TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION
• TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS :
• 6) Bid bond – Bank
guarantee • 1) Scope of work
• 7) Performance bond – • 2) Project design basis
Bank guarantee • 3) Construction work
• 8) Secrecy agreement • 4) Project schedule
• 9) General guarantees and • 5) Inspection and tests
warrantees • 6) Spare parts requirement
• 10) Schedule of prices and • 7) Shipping and packing
rates instruction
• 8) Work procedure
HOW TO PREQUALIFY EPC FIRMS
Price
Evaluation
Proposal Criteria
Tech. Evaluation
Proposal Committee
EVALUATION OF PREQUALIFICATION
APPLICATION AND BIDS
Evaluation criteria and procedures should be
finalized by the client (sometimes with the help of
consultants) BEFORE the opening of applications
and bids.
Evaluation criteria will be different for services (e.g.
EPC/General Contractors) and goods (e.g.
suppliers, vendors, package item manufacturers,
etc.)
Bids may consist of TWO envelope system –
Technical Proposal and Price Proposal, or
composite type.
TECHNICAL OFFER (PROPOSAL) – ITEMS
FOR EVALUATION
• Capability of the bidding company (as in
prequalification document).
• Execution plan and schedule
• Compliance with codes, standards, etc.
• Transfer of Technology
• Guarantees and Warrantees
• Delivery schedule
• Spare parts
• Technical Group
• Finance Group
• Corporate Group
• Legal Group
DISCUSSION
Process Licensor
EPC firm/Engineering Contractor/General Contractor
Vendors
Package Unit Manufacturers
Things to be noted :
1. Estimated pressure drops, leakages, gas composition
2. Difference between expected and guaranteed values
3. Metering inaccuracies and others
Review Methods:
1. Check streams for correct sequence
2. Check material balance
3. Check process conditions with process description
4. Check equipment with given Equipment List
5. Check guaranteed consumption figures
PIPING & INSTRUMENTATION
DIAGRAMS (P&ID)
Basically it is an extended process flowsheet with
valves, fittings, instruments, etc.
1. Piping design and material specification
2. Continuity check
3. Controls : Instruments for Start ups and Shut downs,
Equipment and Catalyst performance, Location of
Control Panels & sampling points, By passes on
control valves, Alarm Systems
4. Electrical
5. Maintenance: Blocking, Venting, Draining,
Purging, Cleaning, Change of catalysts/packings
PLOT PLAN/PLANT LAYOUT
EngineeringDepartment
Quality Assurance
Procurement
Manufacturing/Fabrication
Production control
NEGOTIATING A
CONTRACT
CHAPTER 16 OF TEXT
TYPES OF CONTRACT
LSTK ?
Cost plus fee (ZFCL and CUFL)
1. Legal
2. Engineering and Technological
3. Finance and accounts
4. Funding agencies
5. Government (Labor,
Env.,Customs, etc.)
6. Clients own specialists
DISCUSSION ISSUES DURING
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
• Scope of work • Utilization of local
resources
• Payment terms
• Transfer of
• Liquidated damage technology
• Laws and arbitration • Different procedures
• Force majeure • Approved vendors
• List of critical items
• Warranty,
Guarantee • Subcontracting
• Effective date of
• Performance contract
guarantee
WE SHOULD AVOID
CHAPTER 13 OF TEXT
WHY AND WHAT TO INSPECT ?
• Why Inspect ?
To make sure engineering requirements have
been complied with.
What to Inspect ?
(1) Plant Equipment and Materials
(2) Compliance with accepted Codes and
Standards
(3) Ensure that correct tests have been
undertaken
(4) Ensure safety requirements have been
complied with
(5) Vendor’s fabrication procedure
WHEN TO INSPECT ?
Client
EPC
Process Licensor
Consultant
Funding/ Donor Agency
Why Prequalify bidders?
Organization – when
Which
and where it was
formed?
qualifications
Financial status?
Engineering/ Working
are most
capability?
Experience?
important for
Must be Bangladeshi?
Bangladesh
experience?
our country?
Inquiry Documents for Bids