A Review On Biomass Cook Stove
A Review On Biomass Cook Stove
A Review On Biomass Cook Stove
performance in terms of efficiency, carbon monoxide (CO) C. Murari Mohan Roy and Kenny W. Corscadden [3]
emissions, and particulate matter (PM) emissions. This study presents combustion and emission results
obtained using an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
wood stove for 15 biomass briquettes produced from a range
of feedstock including hay and switch grass.
inside the stove. Unsteady state mathematical model The heat release rate of the improved cookstove
involves all the processes occurring simultaneously or (metal stove with insulation) is 82% higher than the
sequentially during the solid fuel combustion such as traditional cookstove. Hence, the efficiency of the improved
moisture evaporation, devolatilization, pyrolysis and cookstove was 1.8 times higher than the traditional
homogeneous and heterogeneous combustion reactions. cookstove.
A clay stove can hold 3.6 times of heat energy as
compared to metal cookstove made of stainless steel.
REFERENCES
[1] Jessica Tryner and Bryan D.Willson, “The effects of
fuel type and stove design on emissions and efficiency
of natural-draft semi-gasifier biomass cookstoves”, July
2014
[2] T. B. Reed and E. Anselmo, “Testing & Modelling the
wood gas turbo stove”, July 1996
[3] Murari Mohon Roy and Kenny W. Corscadden, “An
experimental study of combustion and emissions of
biomass briquettes in a domestic wood stove”, May
2012
[4] Nordica MacCarty and Dean Stil, “Fuel use and
emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the
Fig. 10: Effect of bed height and flame temperature on laboratory and related benchmarks of performance”,
suction created by flue gases. June 2010
[5] N.L. Panwar and N.S. Rathore, “Design and
performance evaluation of a 5kW producer gas stove”,
April 2008
[6] Vıctor M. Berrueta and Rufus D. Edwards, “Energy
performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Mexico”,
June 2007
[7] Ranjit Powar and Paris Yadav, “Performances
Evaluation of Force Draft Gasifier Based Cook Stove”,
May 2014
[8] S.varunkumar, “Experimental and computational
Fig. 11: Validation of Temperature results studies on gasifier based stove”, August 2011
This unsteady state model gives the temperature [9] Marian Bojko, “A definition of the mathematical order
profiles at different locations inside the stove and fuel mass of combustion process in the stove”, January 2009
loss (combustion) rate, which can be further used to [10] Shankar kausley and Aniruddha Pandit, “ modelling of
calculate the power delivery by the stove during solid fuel stoves”, October 2009
combustion. The model shows good agreement with the
experimental results. These models can be used to find the
effect of stove geometry and fuel properties on the stove
performance parameters such as effective maximum flame
temperature, suction created inside the stove, propagation of
ignition front inside the stove, and fuel burn rate, which play
an important role in the design of such stoves for maximum
thermal efficiencies.
III. CONCLUSION
High power hot start give better results than the cold power
since it minimizes the initial thermal losses of the system
which occurs during cold start phase.
Thermal efficiency can be increased by using fan
since it provide better mixing of air with fuel and makes the
combustion proper.
Designed forced draft cook stove has efficiency
near about 40% and natural draft cook stove has efficiency
about 25%.
Increased air flow from the top that is secondary air
caused enhanced recirculation around the fuel bed brings in
more oxygen that reacts closer to the surface and transfers
additional heat enhancing the combustion in the fuel bed.