Old Testament Survey PDF
Old Testament Survey PDF
Old Testament Survey PDF
An Independent-Study Textbook
Developed by
Global University Faculty and Staff
Second Edition
1-800-443-1083
Fax: (417) 862-0863
E-mail: berean@globaluniversity.edu
Web: www.globaluniversity.edu
Contributing Content Specialists
John Wesley Adams
Bethany Nazarene College (now known as Southern Nazarene University), BA, MA
Nazarene Theological Seminary, BD, MDiv
Baylor University, PhD
James Book
Northwest College, BA
Assemblies of God Theological Seminary, MA, MDiv
Covenant Theological Seminary, DMin
Donald Johns
Central Bible College (now merged with Evangel University), BA
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, MA
Saint Louis University, PhD
Quentin McGhee
Oral Roberts University, BS, DMin
Assemblies of God Theological Seminary, MDiv
The term Palestine is used throughout this course to identify the geographic region generally located between the Sea of
Galilee and the Negev desert and west of the Jordan River. Although this term is not an official political label for this area either
now or during the first century AD, it is a convenient way to reference a geographic area that is very difficult to name due to its
tumultuous political, ethnic, and religious history. This descriptive term has been used since the fifth century BC, even though
it was not officially applied as a political designation until the second century AD. It is used for convenience because of its
general recognition and does not intend any historical, political, or ethnic implications.
Global University
Springfield, Missouri, USA
Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture is taken from the Holy Bible, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. NIV®.
Copyright© 1973, 1978, 1984 International Bible Society. All rights reserved throughout the world. Used by permission of
International Bible Society.
PN 02.15.02
ISBN 978-0-7617-1466-8
Printed in the United States of America by Gospel Publishing House, Springfield, Missouri
Table of Contents
Enrollment Information for Berean Courses.............................................................................7
How to Use Berean Courses.....................................................................................................8
Old Testament Survey.............................................................................................................12
Reference List.......................................................................................................................229
This printed independent-study textbook (IST) represents only one of the ways you can study through
Global University’s Berean School of the Bible (BSB). Global University offers electronic delivery formats
that allow you to complete courses without using printed material.
You may choose one or more of these course delivery options with or without the printed IST.
Digital Courses
• Online Courses. Complete your entire ministry training program online with fully interactive learning
options.
You can complete your chapter reviews, unit progress evaluations, and final exam online and receive
instant results, even if you use print or other digital study versions.
• Logos Bible Software. Purchase an entire digital library of Bibles and Bible reference titles and the
Berean courses specifically created to function inside these digital library environments.
• Electronic courses. Check Global University’s website for additional electronic course versions (for
e-readers and other devices) and their availability.
Enrollment Policies and Procedures
Enrollment policies and procedures are provided in the most current Berean School of the Bible Academic
Catalog. An electronic version of the catalog is available at the Global University website.
Unit Overview
A unit overview previews each unit’s content
and outlines the unit development.
Chapter, Lesson Content, Lesson Objectives, and
Numbering System
Each chapter begins with an introduction and
outline. The outline presents the chapter’s lesson titles
and objectives. Chapters consist of short lessons to
allow you to complete one lesson at a time (at one
sitting), instead of the entire chapter at one time.
The lesson content is based on lesson objectives.
Lesson objectives present the important concepts
and perspectives to be studied in the course.
Each chapter, lesson, and objective is uniquely
numbered. This numbering system is designed to help
you relate the lesson objective to its corresponding
lesson content. Chapters are numbered consecutively throughout
the course. Lessons are numbered within each chapter with a
two-digit decimal number. For example, Lesson 2 in Chapter 3
is numbered 3.2. The first number is the chapter (3), the second
number is the lesson (2) within the chapter.
Lesson objectives are tagged with a three-digit decimal
number. For example, Chapter 1, Lesson 1, Objective 1 is
identified as Objective 1.1.1. Chapter 1, Lesson 2, Objective 3 is
Objective 1.2.3. The first number is the chapter, the second is the
lesson, and the third is the objective. The numbering system is to
assist you in identifying, locating, and organizing each chapter,
lesson, and objective.
How to Use Berean Courses 9
Final Examination
Successfully completing this course requires that you apply content you study
in a ministry activity. The instructions for this Service Learning Requirement
(SLR) are found in the Essential Course Materials in the back of this IST.
Please take time now to become familiar with these instructions so that you
can be planning your SLR activity throughout your study of this course.
14 Old Testament Survey
1
The Law
UNIT The Old Testament is a treasure filled with narratives about God’s creative
power and the history of the nation of Israel. Yet some believers do not fully
appreciate the value of studying the Old Testament. In part, this attitude has
developed because some teachers take Old Testament passages out of context,
ignoring valid principles of interpretation and imposing an unjustified legalism.
Other teachers have gone to the opposite extreme, claiming that the Old
Testament does not apply at all to today’s Christians. However, this view fails to
account for the New Testament’s numerous quotations from the Old Testament.
The New Testament writers obviously viewed the Old Testament as God’s Word.
In fact, without a proper understanding of the Old Testament, we cannot fully
understand and appreciate the New Testament.
Therefore, in Unit 1, we will begin to discover the Old Testament’s riches by
examining the books of the Law. These first three chapters will survey the value
of the Old Testament and the account of beginnings, the lives of the patriarchs,
and the early years of Israel’s history.
Please take time to read each book of the Old Testament as you approach the
specific lessons.
1.1
The Old Testament
LESSON The Signifi cance of the Old Testament
People buy more Bibles than any other book in the world. Millions live
by its message. Bible translators have put the Scriptures into more than 2,300
languages. Over 95 percent of the world’s people have access to at least part of
1.1.1
OBJECTIVE the Bible in a language they know. As you study, remember that you are joining
summarize key facts about millions of others who love and obey God’s Word.
the old Testament. The Old Testament is accepted by more people than are all other religious
writings combined. Jews, Muslims, and Christians all find their beginnings in the
Old Testament. With this in mind, let us consider four common questions about
this first section of the Bible.
What Is the Old Testament?
1 Briefly describe the Old We refer to the first thirty-nine books of the Bible as the old Testament.
Testament. Based on a Latin word derived from Hebrew and Greek roots, the term testament
describes “a covenant, agreement, or will” (see the following table).
The Old Testament, then, was a covenant or agreement between God and
Israel, the children of Abraham. God promised to keep His part of the covenant
if the Israelites kept their part. He instituted a tabernacle, priests, and animal
sacrifices and gave them laws to live by. He promised to bless Israel if they
obeyed His laws.
The biblical accounts show that God’s people had a difficult time keeping
the old covenant. Yet, as we continue to study the Old Testament, we will better
understand its role in God’s plan and its significance for us today.
Who Wrote the Old Testament, and When?
The Old Testament is a part of the Bible, a term derived from Greek and
Latin words for “book.” The Bible is the book above all other books in that
it contains sixty-six books written by about forty authors over a period of
approximately 1,500–1,600 years—yet all inspired by the same Spirit. That is, all
the words of Scripture—both Old and New Testaments—were breathed by God
(2 Timothy 3:16). God guided the authors of the Old and New Testament books
to write what He wanted them to write. He carried them along by His Holy Spirit
(2 Peter 1:21). Throughout this course, we will study the authors God inspired to
write each Old Testament book as well as the approximate date of the writing.
How Did the Books of the Old Testament Get into Our Bible?
2 Explain what is meant by We refer to the books from Genesis to Malachi as the canon of the Old
the term canon. Testament. The word canon first meant “reed” but later came to mean “standard.”
Thus, the Old Testament canon is the list of books that meet the standards for
being in God’s Word. The thirty-nine books in our Old Testament are the same
books that Jesus and the Jews of His day accepted as God’s Word.
18 Old Testament Survey
The Catholic Bible and some Eastern Orthodox Bibles also contain books
that are grouped in a class called the Apocrypha. The word Apocrypha first meant
“hidden books” but later came to mean “not in the canon or list.” During the time
of Martin Luther, the Catholics accepted seven apocryphal books as well as minor
additions to the books of Esther and Daniel (Harris 1969, 180). The Catholics did
not officially accept the books of the Apocrypha until 1546 at the Council of Trent.
Although some of these books were included in the Septuagint (the Greek
translation of the Hebrew Scriptures), they were not part of the Hebrew
Scriptures during Christ’s time. Neither Jesus nor the apostles quoted any of the
apocryphal books as Scripture (Harris 1969, 182–183). While the books in the
Apocrypha contain some truth, they also contain error. Therefore, they do not
meet the standards set for recognizing Scripture.
Why Should We Study the Old Testament?
3 Why is it important to We should study the Old Testament for at least three reasons. First, the Old
study the Old Testament? Testament comprises 75 percent of the entire Bible. To ignore it would be to miss
a large portion of God-inspired Scripture! All of God’s Word “is a lamp to our feet
and a light for our path” (Psalm 119:105). All of God’s Word is precious to us.
Second, God has not changed since Old Testament days. Some people see
God as a God of anger and judgment in the Old Testament and a God of love in
the New Testament. However, the Old Testament describes the God of justice
and love (Deuteronomy 4–6; Jeremiah 9:23–24). He is the same God in both
the Old and New Testaments. He has not changed. The apostle Paul knew the
Old Testament well, and he referred to God as “the Father of compassion”
(2 Corinthians 1:3). We should therefore study the Old Testament to understand
God better.
Third, the Old Testament is the seed and plant from which the fruit of the
New Testament grew (Archer 1978, 17). As a result, the Old Testament provides
the background we need to understand the New Testament. For example, John
the Baptist called Jesus “the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world”
(John 1:29). We can understand the full significance of the term Lamb of God as
we read the Old Testament and its descriptions of the animal sacrifices.
Think of all the Old Testament people mentioned in the New Testament.
Without the Old Testament, we would not know much about Adam, Abel, Noah,
Abraham, Moses, or others that Jesus and the apostles often referred to. The New
Testament refers to the Old Testament more than six hundred times. Thus, we
must know the Old Testament well to understand the New.
Treasures from the Old Testament 19
1.2
The Beginnings (Genesis 1–11)
The English word genesis means “beginnings”; thus, the book of Genesis is
LESSON the book of beginnings. Its first eleven chapters describe Creation, the Fall, and
the Flood. God has chosen not to reveal every specific detail about each event to
us; rather, He has emphasized what He deems important.
As the story develops, we realize how the truths taught in Genesis are
foundational to God’s provision of redemption and a Redeemer. Genesis not
only shows humanity’s sin but also affirms God’s divine provision for salvation.
Introduced in Genesis 1–11, these truths are expanded in the abbreviated
biographies of the patriarchs in Genesis 12–50.
20 Old Testament Survey
Survey courses often call attention to highlights and do not always cover
every detail. However, the study of Genesis is exciting; the stories are interesting
and suspenseful; and the people teach us valuable lessons for living the Christian
life today. Therefore, to adequately cover the book of Genesis, we will study
Genesis 1–11 in this lesson and Genesis 12–50 in Chapter 2.
1.2.1 Authorship
OBJECTIVE
discuss authorship issues As noted in the previous lesson, the first five books of the Bible are called the
regarding the Pentateuch. Law or the Pentateuch. In Greek, pente means “five,” and teuchos means “scroll”
or “book.” Thus, Pentateuch means “five books.” It includes Genesis, Exodus,
Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
5 Why is Moses considered Who could have written the Pentateuch? Whom did God’s Spirit inspire
to have written the Pentateuch? with the account of the beginnings of history? Genesis itself contains no explicit
reference to the author, who has chosen to remain in the background. Yet, “in
general, the Bible and all of Jewish and Christian tradition credit Moses as
the author of the Pentateuch” (Arnold 1998, 175). When we carefully read the
remaining books of the Pentateuch and study Judeo-Christian tradition, we note
important evidence for Mosaic authorship.
Internal biblical evidence points to the real possibility that Moses wrote at
least sections of the Pentateuch and perhaps the entire Pentateuch.
Moses is responsible for the pentateuchal law, which covers roughly Exodus
20–Deuteronomy 26. Thus the heart of the Pentateuch has a Mosaic self-
claim, which should not be missed. Much of this material is said to be
material that the Lord spoke to Moses (as in Exodus 25:1 and Leviticus 1:1),
or “the very words Moses spoke to all of Israel” (Deuteronomy 1:1). More
specifically, the text states that Moses actually wrote down an account of the
battle against Amalek (Exodus 17:14), the so-called Book of the Covenant
(Exodus 24:4) and at least portions of the Book of Deuteronomy (31:9; 19,
22, 24). (Arnold 1998, 175–176)
Since Moses wrote many years after the events of Genesis took place, he may
have used written materials and oral stories handed down from one generation to
the next. We believe that the Holy Spirit guided Moses to write what God wanted
to include in the Pentateuch.
A large number of Bible verses reveal that Moses wrote, spoke, or said
something (see Exodus 15:1; Deuteronomy 31:9, 22). Others mention
a “book” that has its origins with Moses (see 2 Chronicles 23:4;
Ezra 6:18). Mosaic authorship does not mean, however, that no portions
of the Pentateuch are earlier or later than the life of Moses. Nor should
his authorship be taken to mean that he used no sources compiling the
Pentateuch. In Numbers, for example, he quotes from “the Book of the
Wars of the Lord” (21:14). Like Luke would do centuries later in putting
together his gospel (1:1–4), Moses examined the materials at his disposal.
Guided by the Holy Spirit, he selected the information that was suitable.
(Williams 2003a, 64)
humankind’s creation, fall, judgment, and scattering. Thus, they introduce God,
humans, and the problem of sin.
Humans were made in God’s image, but sin separated them from God. From
that point on, the Bible begins to reveal God’s solution to the problem of sin
and separation. Later in Genesis, the Lord calls Abraham to raise up a nation as
a light to bring salvation to all other nations. While we will explore this theme
of salvation and the Messiah throughout the Old Testament, it is important to
see that Genesis 1–11 introduces the background and the problem that the entire
Bible discusses (Robert Cooley interview 2003).
I. The Creation Account, 1–2
A. Summary of all creation (1:1–2:4)
B. Creation of Adam and Eve (2:4–25)
II. Humanity’s Fall and Its Results, 3–5
A. Adam and Eve’s disobedience and judgment (3)
B. Cain and the ungodly lineage (4:1–24)
C. Seth and the godly lineage (4:25–5:32)
III. The Flood: God’s Judgment, 6:1–8:17
IV. Humankind’s New Beginning, 8:18–11:32
A. God’s covenant with Noah (8:20–9:17)
B. Noah and his sons (9:18–10:32)
C. The tower of Babel (11:1–9)
D. The messianic line of Shem (11:10–32)
Even within the step-by-step view, people have many different beliefs about
how long God took to complete creation. While the Bible says the work of
creation took six days, it does not explain the length of each day. As with other
Scripture passages, the word day in Genesis 1–11 may mean a long period of
time. Peter tells us that with the Lord, “a day is like a thousand years, and a
thousand years are like a day” (2 Peter 3:8). On the other hand, a day in Scripture
often refers to twenty-four hours (Genesis 8:12).
The Literary Framework View (1:1–31)
Some Bible interpreters understand the organization of the days in Genesis
1 to be topical and theological, not necessarily chronological or sequential
(Moreland and Reynolds 1999, 138). This is called the literary framework view
because of the literary structure of the biblical text. These interpreters view Days
4–6 as being parallel to Days 1–3. For example, Day 4 is parallel to Day 1 in that
both days deal with the subject of light. Days 2 and 5 are similar in that waters
and sky are the theme; yet in Day 5, the animals that inhabit these areas are also
mentioned. The third and sixth days deal with land, although the creation of
animals and humankind are mentioned in the account of the sixth day (Blocher
1984, 51).
The important thing in all of these views is that God is acknowledged as our
Creator and Provider.
The Creator and Provider
Two names for God appear in the Genesis Creation story. At first, the Hebrew
name Elohim is used to show God in His relationship to the world. The name
Elohim describes Him as the great Creator (Colossians 1:16; Hebrews 1:2).
Treasures from the Old Testament 23
Beginning in Genesis 2:4, however, the greater name yahweh elohim (Lord
God) is used. Yahweh is the personal, revealed name that speaks of God in His
relationship to humankind. It shows Him as the One who is there, who cares and
provides for us. Thus, as God begins to form the first human being—the climax,
or highest point, of Creation—He becomes the Lord God, having a special
relationship with humanity. From Genesis 2:4 on, humankind is at the center of
God’s interests.
Creation of Humankind (2:4–25)
Most believers agree that creation changes. Bodies of water may become
smaller or disappear, or rivers may shift their course over time. Animals change
or evolve as they adapt to new conditions or areas. In this sense, then, we would
say that evolution—meaning “change”—occurs.
However, some teach evolution in a false way. This theory of evolution claims
that lower life-forms slowly changed into animals and that apes slowly evolved
and became humans.
In contrast, the Bible teaches that God himself created Adam and made
humanity superior to animals. This is clear from several aspects:
• The Bible shows humans as intelligent and responsible. Adam was
responsible for naming the animals and ruling over them. He took care of
the Garden of Eden, and he and Eve enjoyed daily fellowship with God.
In addition, God continues to communicate and converse with humans
through language today.
• God created man and woman in His own image (Genesis 1:27), which is
reflected in many ways: (1) Humans are to be holy as God is holy
(1 Peter 1:15–16). Nowhere are animals given this mandate. (2) While God
allows us to kill and eat animals, He commands us not to kill our fellow
humans. Killing a human is considered murder. (3) Animals do not have an
eternal soul or spirit and thus will not be resurrected or judged. However,
God says that each human will give an account for his or her words and
deeds (Matthew 12:36; John 5:28–29; Acts 10:42; 2 Timothy 4:1; Revelation
20:11–15).
• The animals could not give Adam love or friendship. None was a “suitable
helper” for Adam (Genesis 2:20). Therefore, God created Eve to be
Adam’s wife and helper (2:21).
• God commanded Adam and Eve to “fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over
the fish . . . and the birds . . . and over every living creature that moves
on the ground” (Genesis 1:26, 28). God himself gave humanity dominion
over all other living things.
The Fall (Genesis 3–5)
1.2.3 Two life-altering events stand out in the history of humankind: (1) humanity’s
OBJECTIVE fall in the Garden and (2) Christ’s coming to save fallen humanity. The Fall
describe the Fall and the occurred before there were written records. Therefore, we depend on God’s Word
Flood. to tell us about the creation of humans, their fall, and God’s plan to save them.
Adam and Eve (3:1–24)
7 What two major historical
events link the Old Testament The Scriptures show that the fall of humankind and its results are real. Adam and
with the New Testament? Eve were real people whose relationship to God depended on trust and obedience.
However, they chose to disobey because they doubted God’s word. They listened to
the tempter and sinned by obeying his suggestions. Because of this sin, God judged
the serpent, Satan, Eve, and Adam (Genesis 3:1–24; Romans 5:12, 15–19).
24 Old Testament Survey
8 Give an example of Yet God gave Adam and Eve mercy before judgment. How? He promised them
God’s judgment and of His that the Seed of the woman would defeat the seed of the serpent (Genesis 3:15).
mercy in the Garden. This was the first promise of the coming Messiah. Later in the Old Testament, God
would give more details about the promised Messiah (Genesis 12:1–3; Numbers
24:17–19; 2 Samuel 7; 1 Chronicles 17:11–14; Isaiah 7:14; 9:6–7).
After showing mercy by promising Adam and Eve a Savior, God showed
judgment by driving them out of the Garden. At that moment, they began to feel
the full weight of the curse that sin brought. Still, in the midst of His judgment,
God displayed His love by clothing them with animal skins.
Although God punished Adam and Eve for disobeying Him, He gave them
hope for the future. When Cain was born, Eve expressed that hope by saying,
“With the help of the Lord I have brought forth a man” (Genesis 4:1). She knew
that, through the continuation of the human line, someday God’s promised
Redeemer would crush the serpent’s head (3:15). From one generation to another,
others held on to the hope of victory over sin and the serpent and thus kept the
promise of redemption alive.
Cain (4:1–24)
However, Eve’s hope of a Redeemer would not be realized in Cain, who
became the first murderer. Cain disobeyed by offering God a sacrifice that did
not please Him (Genesis 4:3–5). It is not clear whether God instructed Cain and
Abel about what type of sacrifice they should bring or why God was displeased
with Cain’s offering. Although the biblical account acknowledges sin in Cain’s
life (4:6–7), it does not specifically state what that sin is. In any case, the events
surrounding the sacrifice resulted in Cain’s anger and jealousy, which led him to
sin by murdering his brother (4:8; 1 John 3:12). God punished Cain by placing
him under a curse and condemning him to wander the earth.
9 Compare Cain’s Genesis 4:17–24 includes a summary of Cain and his family tree, which may
family record with Seth’s cover a long period of time. Some of Cain’s descendants raised flocks and herds.
descendants. In time, they developed many useful things, including musical instruments. They
learned how to forge metal such as bronze and iron into tools and weapons.
Because of their progress, the people began to feel safe. They depended on
themselves, not on God.
The Bible presents Lamech, a descendant of Cain, as a very proud man. He
was the first man we know of to reject God’s plan of monogamy (Genesis 4:19).
Also, he bragged about killing a man who hurt him. Lamech did not believe in
an eye for an eye; he believed in a life for a bruise (4:23). Lamech considered
himself ten times more valuable than Cain (4:24).
Seth (4:25–5:32)
Adam and Eve renewed their hope in God when Seth was born. Eve said,
“God has granted me another child in place of Abel, since Cain killed him”
(Genesis 4:25). Seth’s legacy turned out to be very different from Cain’s.
As we examine Seth’s lineage, it is important to understand the approach
of biblical cultures to compiling genealogies. The Hebrews used the word son
much like we use the term descendant today. It indicated any relationship to
an ancestor. Thus, a son (descendant) in the biblical text could refer to a son,
grandson, great-grandson, and so on. As a result, the biblical genealogies are
selective, not comprehensive. This allows genealogies to cover long periods of
time, highlighting only key descendants. The genealogy of Genesis 5 covers a
great deal history, yet moves the narrative ahead quickly (Arnold 1998, 58).
Treasures from the Old Testament 25
With this in mind, we note that Seth’s descendants included Enosh (his son),
Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah. Several of
those in Seth’s family line were godly men. In the days of Enosh, people “began
to call on the name of the Lord” (Genesis 4:26).
Enoch was born several centuries after Seth and Enosh. He was a godly person,
well known for his lifestyle of close fellowship with God. In the brief account of
his life, the Bible twice emphasizes that Enoch walked with God (5:22, 24). He had
such a close relationship with God that his life did not end in death. Rather, God
raptured Enoch, taking him up to heaven while he was still alive.
The godly example of Seth’s line continued in Noah’s father, Lamech (a
different Lamech than Cain’s descendant). The Scriptures record that Lamech
believed and hoped in God. When Noah was born, Lamech prophesied, “He will
comfort us in the labor and painful toil of our hands caused by the ground the Lord
has cursed” (5:29). Lamech believed God would provide a way for people to be set
free from the curse of sin that had expelled Adam and Eve from the Garden.
inclination of [humanity’s] heart is evil from childhood” (8:21). The Flood did
not erase humankind’s sin nature. The sin nature would still express itself.
Noah and His Sons (9:18–10:32)
The sin nature’s continued existence is illustrated in the story of Ham, one
of Noah’s sons. Ham failed to demonstrate respect for his father when he found
Noah drunk and uncovered (9:20–22). As a result, Noah cursed Canaan, Ham’s
son, saying that Canaan’s sons would be servants of servants. Some people have
wrongly interpreted this event, attributing the slavery of African-Americans to their
descent from Canaan. Such a conclusion is wholly incorrect. The Canaanites were
not the same color as African-Americans. More importantly, the color of a person’s
skin does not matter to God. He loves everyone and shows no favoritism.
Ham was the youngest of Noah’s three sons. His older brothers were Japheth
and Shem. As noted in Genesis 10, each of Noah’s sons migrated to a different
area: Japheth toward Spain and northern Asia Minor, Ham toward Africa
(10:6–14), and Shem near the Persian Gulf (10:21–31).
The Tower of Babel (11:1–9)
After the Flood, the human race was one group that spoke only one
language. Although God had originally directed Noah’s family to “fill the earth”
(Genesis 9:1), many individuals settled on the Plain of Shinar for quite some
time (11:1–2). As their pride and arrogance in their abilities and skills grew,
they purposed to build a tower at Babel—a great tower that would reach to the
heavens. Their main motivation was “so that we may make a name for ourselves”
(11:4). However, God confused their language to hinder communication and
cooperation and to halt their plans. As a result, people finally migrated to several
different locations according to God’s original instructions.
The Messianic Line of Shem (11:10–32)
Genesis 11 ends with a synopsis of Shem’s lineage. The children of Shem
are called Shemites (Semites), from which the word Semitic is derived. The
list in Genesis 11 names ten families and ends with Terah, who moved from Ur
to Haran. Terah was Abraham’s father. Through this nation, the promise of a
Messiah would be fulfilled (Genesis 22:15–18; Matthew 1:1–2). Genesis 12–50
discusses the early patriarchs, whom we will study in the next chapter.
Treasures from the Old Testament 27
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
1
CHAPTER
1. The Old Testament was a covenant or agreement 6. The idea that creation days are not necessarily
between God and chronological is a characteristic of the
a) Enoch. a) gap theory.
b) Noah. b) literary framework view.
c) the Hebrews. c) step-by-step view.
d) Israel’s surrounding nations. d) young earth view.
2. The word canon refers to the books that meet the 7. The idea that Creation consisted of sequential
standards set for divine acts is a characteristic of the
a) academic quality. a) theistic evolution view.
b) recognizing Scripture. b) step-by-step view.
c) literary excellence. c) literary framework view.
d) outstanding authorship. d) gap theory.
3. Studying the Old Testament is important because 8. The idea that a major time lapse occurred
a) it is about 50 percent of the entire Bible. between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 is a characteristic of the
b) it alone describes the reality of God’s anger. a) theistic evolution view.
c) it helps us to properly understand the New b) step-by-step view.
Testament. c) literary framework view.
d) the New Testament refers to it more than six d) gap theory.
thousand times.
9. The biblical account of the Fall reveals a
4. The major divisions of the English Old tension between
Testament are the a) husbands and wives.
a) Pentateuch, History, Poetry and Wisdom, Major b) animals and humans.
Prophets, and Minor Prophets. c) mercy and judgment.
b) Pentateuch, History, Poetry and Wisdom, d) murder and grace.
Former Prophets, and Latter Prophets.
10. Our study indicates that the Flood was primarily
c) Law, Former Prophets, Latter Prophets, and the
an act of God’s
Writings.
a) grace.
d) Law, History, Former Prophets, Latter Prophets,
b) judgment.
and the Writings.
c) promise.
5. We believe Moses wrote the Pentateuch because of d) sovereignty.
a) internal biblical evidence including a Mosaic
self-claim.
b) Jewish, Christian, and ancient Near Eastern
traditions.
c) his apparent dislike for using other sources.
d) the anonymity of the author of Genesis.
28 Old Testament Survey
2.1
Abraham (Genesis 12:1–25:11)
Abraham is one of the greatest people in history. Judaism, Islam, and
LESSON Christianity all consider him to be the first patriarch. Christians also consider him
to be a person of great faith.
Abraham was born into a family that did not worship the true God
2.1.1 (Joshua 24:2–3). His father, Terah, may have worshipped the moon god. But in
OBJECTIVE response to God’s call, Abraham left his father in Haran:
identify abraham’s Genesis 12 begins with a man and his small family traveling west to an
character strengths and unknown land. Why? Abraham had heard God’s voice and did what God said.
weaknesses. He left his home, his extended family, and his community. He put his security
and future in God’s hands. . . . He could set out on this lifelong “camping trip,”
because “he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect
and builder is God” (Hebrews 11:8–10). (Stallman 2003, 193–194)
Before moving to Haran, Abraham’s family originally lived in Ur of the
Chaldeans, a city along the Tigris-Euphrates River Valley near the Persian Gulf.
The large area between ancient Ur and the Nile River in Egypt, now known as the
Fertile Crescent, is shaped as its name implies—like an upturned crescent moon.
While the land south of the crescent is desert, the land of the crescent itself is green
and rich. The two end points of the Fertile Crescent, Egypt and Chaldea (Babylon),
were great centers of culture, learning, and trade in the old world. Traders often
traveled with loaded camels and donkeys between Egypt and Chaldea. To do this,
they had to pass through Canaan, a region by the Mediterranean Sea later known as
Please Note: Palestine*. Thus, Canaan was an important place for trade.
*The term Palestine is used throughout
this course to identify the geographic At God’s command and promise, Abraham began his journey to this
region generally located between the unfamiliar region of Canaan (Acts 7:2–4). Abraham’s journey of faith is
Sea of Galilee and the Negev desert
and west of the Jordan River. Although described in Genesis 12–25.
this term is not an official political label
for this area either now or during the Significant Events in Abraham’s Life
first century AD, it is a convenient
way to reference a geographic area Event or Topic Genesis
that is very difficult to name due to
its tumultuous political, ethnic, and Abram’s call 12:1–9
religious history. This descriptive term
has been used since the fifth century Abram in Egypt 12:10–20
BC, even though it was not officially
applied as a political designation Abram and Lot separate 13:1–13
until the second century AD. It is
used for convenience because of Abram promised the land 13:14–18
its general recognition and does not
intend any historical, political, or ethnic Abram rescues Lot 14:1–16
implications.
Abram blessed by Melchizedek 14:17–24
with a son and numerous descendants (15:4–5). Then “Abram believed the Lord,
and he credited it to him as righteousness” (15:6).
More Deception for Protection (Genesis 20)
Later, however, Abraham again demonstrated spiritual weakness in the form
of deception. He apparently had not learned his lesson from the first time he lied.
This time, he lied about his wife to King Abimelech of Gerar. Despite this sin,
God again assisted Abraham and protected Sarah. God also answered Abraham’s
prayer and healed the king and his household.
A Maid as a Wife (Genesis 16; 21:1–21)
After waiting ten more years for the promised son, Sarah had an idea
that stemmed from her sinful nature rather than from God. With Abraham’s
agreement, she gave her maid, Hagar, to Abraham as a second wife—a common
practice at that time. However, conforming to custom is not an excuse for
violating God’s principles. Abraham and Sarah attempted to fulfill a divine
promise through human means. Human means are not always wrong, but we do
need to submit our plans to God and inquire of the Lord.
What really stands out in this story, however, is the way Abraham and Sarah
took matters into their own hands. The whole Book of Genesis makes it clear
that not only does God promise, he delivers. But God always reserves the right
to do things his way and in his time. God didn’t need Abraham’s clever ideas
and help any more than he needs ours today. Faith does more than believe that
God can do what He said He would. Faith trusts that God will do it and then
patiently endures to the end (Hebrews 6:12). (Stallman 2003, 199)
Ultimately, God rejected Abraham and Sarah’s plan. Hagar’s son Ishmael was
not the son God had promised. When Ishmael was thirteen and Abraham ninety-
nine, God again assured Abraham that Sarah would give birth to the true son of
promise, Isaac. Just as He sent a rainbow as the sign of His covenant with Noah,
God then established circumcision as a sign of his covenant with Abraham and
his descendants (Genesis 12:1–3; 13:14–18; 15:18–21; 17:1–27).
Soon after Isaac’s birth, serious problems developed between Sarah and her
maid Hagar. When Sarah asked Abraham to send Hagar and her son Ishmael
away, Abraham was reluctant to carry out the request. Abraham finally did send
Hagar and Ishmael away, but only after he knew this was God’s will (21:9–21).
A Site for Burial (Genesis 23)
When Sarah died, Abraham again followed the custom of his day. He asked
the Hittites to let him buy a tomb in which to bury his wife. After purchasing the
cave of Machpelah and the field around it, Abraham buried Sarah there.
had not yet been given. God can rightly ask for anything He wants, but the
instruction to offer Isaac ought to astonish us, especially when we remember
two important points: Isaac was especially dear to his parents and his birth
was the result of God’s own promise. God’s demand for Isaac’s life struck at
the heart of what was important to Abraham. It involved not only his son, but
also his faith. God’s extraordinary command called for radical obedience from
Abraham. (Stallman 2003, 202)
5 What lessons can be The story of Abraham’s testing contains many lessons for us. For instance,
learned about testing in a it teaches us to maintain a faithful commitment to God even in the direst
believer’s life? circumstances, to let God be God, and to be assured that in His timing, God’s test
will be over.
2.2
Isaac (Genesis 24:1–28:9)
God’s promises were not for Abraham alone; they extended to his son Isaac
LESSON and his descendants. God reconfirmed this both to Abraham (Genesis 22:15–18)
and to Isaac (26:1–5, 24).
Abraham realized that for God to fulfill His promises, Isaac would need a
2.2.1 wife. “Clearly, not just any wife would do. First, she could not be a Canaanite.
OBJECTIVE Why not? Canaanite women had a reputation for low moral standards. The
compare God’s role and girl who would marry Isaac had to be from Abraham’s own people back in
humanity’s role in prayer. Mesopotamia” (Stallman 2003, 204).
The story of how Abraham secured a bride for Isaac not only is intriguing
but also demonstrates the interaction of humanity and God in prayer. The
biblical narrative includes several references to prayer and worship. As
Abraham’s servant stood at a spring, he prayed that the God of his master
would grant “success today” in finding a wife for Isaac (Genesis 24:12–16).
“Before he had finished praying,” Rebekah arrived at the spring to draw water
(24:15). After conversing with the “very beautiful” young lady, Abraham’s
servant worshipped God for answering his prayer. Later, the servant told
Rebekah’s family his account of how God answered prayer at the spring
(24:42–47) and how he had worshipped and praised the Lord as a result
(24:48–49). The story both demonstrates one of the many ways God leads us
and affirms God’s sovereignty.
The account of how Abraham’s servant found Rebekah and brought her to Isaac
is unusually long, but it shows us the marvelous way that God leads. Abraham
knew that God was in control and was sure that he would send an angel to
guide the process (24:7). Besides that, we learn something about Rebekah, who
is destined to be a key player in redemption’s story. Like Abraham, she was
very hospitable and generous, watering the camels and offering a place to stay.
Although she was pretty (24:16), her real attraction came from the quality of her
character (Proverbs 31:10). (Stallman 2003, 204–205)
Later, Isaac himself shows his faith in God and in prayer. When Rebekah
remained barren, Isaac prayed that God would heal her infertility. About twenty
years after they were married, “the Lord answered his prayer, and his wife
Rebekah became pregnant” (Genesis 25:21).
36 Old Testament Survey
2.3
Jacob (Genesis 25:19–35:27)
Rebekah birthed not just one son, but twin sons: Jacob and Esau. The Bible’s
LESSON account of the lives of Jacob and Esau affirms their correct actions but does not
hide their sins and mistakes and poor attitudes. Regardless of cultural and historical
factors, it appears that fighting between brothers is normal. In this case, according
to the Scriptures, the fighting began in Rebekah’s womb (Genesis 25:22):
2.3.1
OBJECTIVE Even before birth, the twins struggled within the womb of Rebekah. She
explain why sibling rivalry inquired as to the significance and God told her that this was a sign that the two,
was not appropriate or followed in turn by their respective posterities, would struggle with each other
necessary. in years to come, with the elder being made to serve the younger. Esau was born
first, with Jacob grasping his heel. (Wood 1970, 66)
6 Describe the The sibling rivalry continued, as seen in the birthright battle that became
consequences of sibling central in the narrative shortly after the birth account. In this incident, Jacob
rivalry in this biblical account. manipulated Esau’s hunger to make the birthright his own. Later, with Rebekah’s
help, he deceived his blind father who was also in poor physical condition. Does
this sound familiar? It should, since “we’ve seen character flaws in this family
before” (Stallman 2003, 206).
2.3.2 Was this deception necessary? Of course not. In spite of commendable faith
OBJECTIVE in God, each family member committed sins while trying to help God out. Some
evaluate the family interpreters say that Isaac could have chosen to “call both his sons to receive
characteristic of favoritism. a blessing, as was customary” (Arnold 1998, 122). Instead, Isaac foolishly
summoned only his favorite son, Esau, whose “tasty food” was the kind he liked
(Genesis 27:4). Not only did sibling rivalry enter into the picture, but conflict also
arose between husband and wife, who each preferred a different child. This led to
the sin of favoritism, resulting in the family feud over the birthright.
Rebekah schemed and manipulated, and Jacob willingly participated in her
devious plan. While Jacob objected at first (27:11–12), his protests seemed to be
motivated by fear rather than genuine concern about the moral issues. Apparently
without much convincing, Jacob agreed to the deception and ended up with the
birthright. This made Esau so angry that Jacob had to flee for his life.
The Patriarchs (Genesis 12–50) 37
7 What were the four Again, the patriarchs and their families teach us valuable lessons. From their
characters in this narrative mistakes, we are reminded that God will accomplish His purposes without our
guilty of? What did it prove “help.” Life situations work out best if we refrain from attempting to assist the
about God?
Sovereign One.
Like Abraham before them, these characters were unwilling to wait on the Lord
to accomplish his will in their lives. Though ultimately God was faithful to
his Word and accomplished his purposes through them, they made their lives
difficult by pursuing their own designs. While other biblical narratives illustrate
the exemplary behavior of our great heroes of faith, this chapter depicts the
fallibility of each member of the chosen family. All four characters are guilty:
Esau in reckless marriages; Isaac in stupefied favoritism; Rebekah in calculated
brazenness; and Jacob in deceitful exploitation. Yet despite all of this, God’s
grace endures and his purpose for the chosen seed of Abraham advances.
(Arnold 1998, 123)
Ill-advised choices often result in unfortunate consequences. Jacob’s
choices led him to seek help from his uncle Laban, who had two daughters:
Leah and Rachel. Jacob loved Rachel and worked seven years for his uncle
as a bride price. However, Laban was a master at deception just as Jacob was.
Laban gave Leah, instead of Rachel, to Jacob as his bride. Only when the
deception became known did Laban explain the local custom of marrying the
older daughter before the younger. He offered to let Jacob marry Rachel one
week later, but only on the condition that he work another seven years for
Laban. Jacob agreed and ended up with two wives, bitterness toward Laban,
and favoritism toward Rachel. This led to tremendous rivalry among Jacob’s
sons. Still, through all the events of Jacob’s life, God remained faithful to His
promises of blessing.
2.4
Joseph (Genesis 37–50)
The story of Joseph is one of the most fascinating in the Bible, occupying
LESSON fourteen chapters at the end of Genesis. People often think of Joseph as the
dreamer, the one with the coat of many colors, and the later ruler over Egypt. Yet
this story involves much more than these few observations. It is characterized
by suspense as well as the old family traits of favoritism and jealousy. The story
2.4.1
OBJECTIVE teaches important lessons about family feuds and forgiveness; temptations and
explain how divine grace, victory; and God’s sovereignty and grace in spite of difficulties, abandonment, and
mercy, and sovereignty severe trials. While no biblical personage is perfect, including Joseph, he comes the
function in the story of closest to showing some biblical qualities that believers should emulate.
Joseph.
Significant Events in Joseph’s Life
Event or Topic Genesis
Joseph hated by his brothers and sold 37:1–36
the Joseph narrative is marked by the recurring phrase “they hated him”
(vv. 4, 5, 8). The phrase is further modified by the observation that his brothers
were unable to speak kindly to him. (Arnold 1998, 146)
2.4.3 Jealousy motivated the brothers to kill Joseph, but the oldest brother, Reuben,
OBJECTIVE talked the others into throwing Joseph into a pit instead. After selling Joseph to
evaluate the actions of a caravan of Midianite merchants, the brothers made it appear to their father that
Joseph’s brothers. Joseph had been killed.
He wanted to ascertain that their hearts had changed. To test them, he decided
to trick them. Claiming they were spies, he allowed them to return home only if
they promised to bring their younger brother Benjamin with them the next time.
9 Compare and contrast On their second trip to Egypt, false accusation entered the story again, but
the actions of Joseph with the this time it was Joseph falsely accusing his own brother Benjamin of stealing his
actions of his brothers. cup. Unaware of Benjamin’s innocence and Joseph’s identity, Judah volunteered
to take Benjamin’s place in punishment. Judah’s impassioned plea moved Joseph
greatly. Many years later, the dreams of Joseph’s youth were being fulfilled:
His brothers were bowing to him, including Judah! Joseph could stand it no
more. The whole thing was torturing him as much as his brothers. Impressed
with this show of loyalty and moved to tears, he ordered his Egyptian servants
out of the room. Once in private, Joseph revealed his true identity to his
brothers, who must have been shocked indeed. What irony! The man who had
saved them from starvation was the brother they had tried to kill. (Stallman
2003, 216)
What a unique, moving, and tearful family reunion! Joseph then asked his
brothers to get their father and move the entire family to Egypt. The brothers did,
and the family was rescued.
One of the many lessons we learn is that God is the key person in this
narrative, not Joseph. The exercise of God’s sovereignty is demonstrated again
and again. The lengthy account of Joseph reaffirms the truths found in the first
part of Genesis:
God had made both good and evil possible in the Garden of Eden at the
beginning of the Book of Genesis. Now at its conclusion we learn that in his
grace and mercy, he works to accomplish his good through even the sinful actions
of human beings. The book offers no explanation of how God turns evil into
good on our behalf. But implicit here is the intimate relationship between divine
sovereignty and human responsibility. We can never fully understand how both
are held together, yet both are clearly affirmed in Scripture. (Arnold 1998, 163)
What a gracious God we serve!
The Patriarchs (Genesis 12–50) 41
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
2
CHAPTER
1. Abraham’s spiritual weaknesses are revealed by his 6. Favoritism in Jacob’s family led to
a) numerous servants, animals, and monetary wealth. a) God’s purposes being accomplished in their lives.
b) boldness in interceding for Sodom and b) positive results for each family member.
Gomorrah. c) spiritual maturity for each family member.
c) acceptance of sinful lifestyles in Sodom and d) continuing problems in succeeding generations.
Gomorrah.
7. Joseph’s experience in prison confirms that he was
d) half-truths about his wife to both Pharaoh and
a) the central character in the biblical narrative.
Abimelech.
b) guilty of sexual sin with Potiphar’s wife.
2. Abraham’s spiritual strengths are revealed by his c) ultimately released due to God’s sovereignty.
great faith and d) a master of deceptive practices.
a) willingness to sacrifice his son.
8. Joseph’s actions in the biblical narrative were
b) willingness to find Isaac a wife.
a) always wise.
c) boldness in asking God about Sodom and
b) usually wise.
Gomorrah.
c) usually sinful.
d) numerous servants, animals, and monetary wealth.
d) always sinful.
3. God asked Abraham to sacrifice Isaac because
9. Joseph’s reunion with his brothers reveals
He was
a) God’s sovereignty.
a) angry at Abraham for having a son with Hagar.
b) Benjamin’s innocence.
b) angry at Abraham for lying about Sarah.
c) the thief who took the cup.
c) testing Abraham about his degree of trust in God.
d) the human will’s link to divine election.
d) instituting child sacrifices for atonement.
10. The actions of Joseph’s brothers in the biblical
4. The story of the servant seeking a wife for Isaac
narrative were
illustrates human
a) always sinful.
a) free agency and divine election.
b) usually sinful.
b) responsibility and divine sovereignty in prayer.
c) usually righteous.
c) weaknesses and divine perfections in prayer.
d) always righteous.
d) sinful nature and divine judgments.
5. Sibling rivalry is not necessary or appropriate
because
a) families should not allow competitiveness.
b) families should model perfection.
c) it can lead to deception and manipulation.
d) any disagreement among brothers is sin.
42 Old Testament Survey
3.1
Exodus: Escape from Egypt
The word exodus means “escape” or “exit.” Thus, the book of Exodus is the
LESSON narrative of the Israelites’ escape from Egypt and their journey to Mount Sinai.
It emphasizes three specific geographical locations: “Israel in Egypt (1:1–12:36),
Israel in the desert (12:37–18:21), and Israel at Mount Sinai (19–40)” (Arnold
and Beyer 1999, 104–105).
3.1.1
OBJECTIVE Several generations passed between the end of Genesis and the beginning
describe the exodus, of Exodus. According to Exodus 1, Abraham’s descendants had become so
journey to sinai, the numerous that the nation of Egypt, where they lived, considered them a threat.
covenant, and the The Pharaoh then in power did not remember Joseph and feared that the Israelites
tabernacle. would turn against him. To keep this potential threat under control, the Egyptians
enslaved the Israelites, and Pharaoh tried to limit their birthrate. He issued an
edict to drown all newborn Israelite male babies in the Nile River (Exodus 1:22).
During this time of slavery, Moses was born. Realizing after three months that
she could no longer hide her baby boy, Moses’s mother put him in a basket and put
the basket in the Nile River. Pharaoh’s daughter found the Hebrew infant, named
him Moses, and took him into her family as her own son. As part of Pharaoh’s
family, Moses received the best Egyptian education and was trained in the wisdom
of the Egyptians. God was preparing Moses for his unique life mission.
When he was forty years old, Moses killed an Egyptian who was beating an
Israelite. He then fled to the desert of Midian, where God continued to train him for
forty years. There he married Zipporah, the daughter of Jethro, a priest of Midian.
Exodus 3 records Moses’s divine encounter with God at the burning bush. It
was here that Moses voiced many objections to God, ranging from “Who am I?
What shall I tell them? What if they do not believe me?” to “Please send someone
else to do it” (Exodus 3:1–4:17). Yet, although He allowed Aaron to help, God did
not release Moses from the call to deliver His people, the nation of Israel.
Themes
1 What are the major The major themes of Exodus are deliverance, covenant, and divine mystery
themes of Exodus? (McQueen 2003, 234). “The people of God were languishing under the heavy
bondage of the Egyptians. They had no leadership and no hope of escape. But
God was moved by his grace and his earlier commitment to the patriarchs
(2:24–5). He delivered his people by providing the necessary human leader,
Moses” (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 111–112). “Although Moses is the primary
human character of the Exodus narratives, the real story is the redemptive work
of Yahweh in delivering Israel from slavery in Egypt and establishing a unique
covenant relationship with the nation” (Hill and Walton 2000, 81).
Outline
I. God Delivers Israel from Slavery, 1–13:19
A. Oppression in Egypt (1)
B. Preparation of Moses (2–4)
C. The contest: God and Pharaoh (5–11)
D. The Passover and the Exodus (12:1–13:19)
II. From Egypt to Sinai, 13:19–19:2
A. God’s deliverance (13:20–15:21)
B. On the way to Mount Sinai (15:22–19:2)
46 Old Testament Survey
of the exodus and the giving of the covenant may be seen as the crux of the
entire Old Testament. (McQueen 2003, 253)
This was not a covenant that made Israel the people of the Lord. That had
been accomplished long before through God’s covenant with Abraham. Rather,
the covenant about to be implemented would give Israel the opportunity to be
God’s servant people, the channel by which He would communicate and transmit
His redemptive program to the whole world (Dyer and Merrill 2001, 57–58).
The Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:1–17)
3 What was the purpose of As part of His covenant with the nation of Israel, God issued the Ten
the Ten Commandments? Commandments to Moses, and Moses conveyed the instructions to the people.
These instructions were given to protect both the individual and the nation.
Their purpose was to prevent injustices and unfair treatment of others. The Ten
Commandments, sometimes called the Decalogue, were “the constitution of
the covenant community, as it were, and the remaining laws are amendments or
clarifications of the commandments” (Dyer and Merrill 2001, 59).
The Ten Commandments were unique because they required monotheism,
the worship of the one true God. Although the surrounding nations worshipped
many gods and made idols to represent them, Israel did not. God commanded
them not to. They were different from the other nations because they knew the
living God. However,
the Israelites’ obedience to the covenant was very short-lived. While Moses was
on the mountain receiving the tablets and instructions for the tabernacle, the
people grew restless. In direct violation of the first and second commandments,
they demanded a visible god to worship. Aaron promptly granted their request
by making a calf from gold supplied by the people themselves. They held a feast
and bowed before the calf as the god that delivered them from Egypt
(Exod. 32:1–6). This act betrayed the heart of the covenant.
(McQueen 2003, 257)
The Israelites broke their promise of obedience and suffered the
consequences. Because of their sin, the Lord inflicted them with a plague.
Yet, through Moses’s intercession and God’s own grace, the Lord restored His
covenant relationship with His people (Exodus 32–34:28).
3.2
Leviticus: Prescription for Living
The book of Leviticus establishes the rituals that were to characterize Israel’s
LESSON religious practice in the days of the Law. In these pages, God gave specific
instructions for how the people were to worship Him with their lives.
Outline
3.2.1
OBJECTIVE I. The Offerings, 1–7
From Leviticus, describe II. The Priests, 8–10
the offerings, the priests,
III. The Laws, 11–22
and the feasts and holy days.
IV. The Feasts and Holy Days, 23–25
V. The Choice, 26–27
2. Sabbath
25:1–7 A year of rest for the land
Year
(continued)
Name Leviticus Purpose and Explanation
8. Trumpets;
Rosh To present Israel to God and seek His favor; the
23:23–25
Hashanah people met, blew trumpets, and offered sacrifices.
(New Year)
9. Day of
To cleanse priests and people from sin; to purify the
Atonement 16;
Holy Place; people rested, fasted in mourning over
(Yom 23:26–32
their sins, and sacrificed.
Kippur)
11. Sacred To recall the closing of the cycle of feasts; they met,
23:36
Assembly rested, and offered sacrifices.
The theology of holiness pervades the book of Leviticus. It affirms both the
holiness of God and the propensity of people toward sin. Yet God desires His people
to move toward holiness. He provides the sacrifice for sin. Thus, the theology of
holiness undergirds the sacrifices, the role of the priests, and the feast celebrations.
3.3
Numbers: Prescription for Traveling
LESSON Outline
The book of Numbers summarizes the nomadic lives of the Israelites and notes
their travels. For almost a year, Israel camped at Mount Sinai, where God gave
them instructions (Numbers 1–10). Later, the Israelites marched for eleven days to
3.3.1
OBJECTIVE Kadesh (11–12). From there, Moses sent spies into the land of Canaan, but their
From numbers, summarize report caused the people to turn away from God in doubt and unbelief (13–14). God
events that happened at punished the Israelites by allowing the faithless generation to die in the wilderness
sinai, kadesh, and moab. (15–19). Finally, after almost forty years, Israel’s next generation was ready to enter
Canaan (26–36). Moses gave his farewell speeches in Deuteronomy to them.
7 Describe the outline of In the following outline, we have divided Numbers into three parts. Note that
Numbers. the chapters in Numbers are not written in the order of the events.
I. At Sinai: God Prepares Israel to Inherit Canaan, 1:1–10:10
A. Preparing to march (1–4)
B. Establishing camp rules (5:1–6:21)
C. Dedicating the tabernacle (6:22–9:16)
D. Following divine guidance to Canaan (9:17–10:10)
II. At Kadesh: The People Forfeit Their Inheritance, 10:11–21:35
A. Complaints and an outpouring of the Spirit (10:11–12:16)
B. Rebellion with ten spies (13–14)
C. Thirty-eight years of wandering (15–19)
D. From Kadesh to the Plains of Moab (20–21)
52 Old Testament Survey
they had more than enough to eat. However, God became so angry about their
ungrateful, selfish attitudes that He punished them, once with fire (11:1–3) and
once with a plague that killed many (11:33–34).
Moses cried out to God because the burden of carrying so much emotional
weight was becoming too heavy. God told him to choose seventy men who
would share the burden and responsibilities of leading the people. God poured
out His Spirit on these individuals so they would be empowered to carry out the
task (11:16–17, 24–30). Human responsibility and delegation, as well as divine
empowerment, are necessary to fulfill God’s assignments for us.
Yet the Israelites’ negative attitude continued. Their complaints led even
Aaron and Miriam to criticize Moses. They were jealous that Moses had all of the
authority. As a result, God rebuked Aaron and Miriam because of their rebellion
and caused Miriam to have leprosy for seven days. In this way, He let everyone
know that Moses was His chosen leader (12:1–15).
Rebellion with Ten Spies (13–14)
As Israel camped in the Desert of Paran, Moses sent twelve spies to the land
of Canaan. Upon returning, they reported that the land was good and fruitful.
However, ten of the spies did not believe Israel could conquer Canaan because
of the great strength and size of the people living there. Only Joshua and Caleb
stood firm in faith and proclaimed that, with God’s help, Israel could take the
land. The people believed the faithless spies, talked of rejecting Moses as their
leader, and threatened to stone Joshua and Caleb.
In response, God told Moses that He would destroy the people and begin a
new nation. But Moses prayed and interceded for the Israelites. Although God
forgave them as Moses asked, He proclaimed that all the unbelieving adults
would die in the wilderness.
Thirty-eight Years of Wandering (15–19)
As a result of God’s judgment, the Israelites spent thirty-eight years
wandering in the desert around Kadesh. During this time, two groups turned
against God and His chosen leaders (Numbers 16). God sent judgment against the
rebels so that the ground opened up and swallowed them and their families.
God also confirmed Aaron as high priest by bringing Aaron’s rod to life,
having it blossom and produce almonds. It was later placed in the ark of the
covenant (Hebrews 9:4).
From Kadesh to the Plains of Moab (20–21)
While in Kadesh, a crisis arose when the multitude had no water. Again, the
people complained against Moses’s leadership. God told Moses to speak to a rock
so that water would flow from it, but Moses struck the rock instead. Although
water still came from the rock, Moses’s disobedience caused the Lord to bar him
from entering the Promised Land.
Finally, after thirty-eight years in the wilderness, the Israelites arrived at the
border, continuing to complain. God punished them by sending deadly snakes
into the camp. When they repented and Moses prayed for them, God provided a
way for them to live. If a person who was bitten looked upon the snake of bronze
that Moses placed on a pole, he or she would live (21:4–9). Later, Jesus used this
as an illustration of the life He would offer through His death (John 3:14–15).
From there, Israel traveled south and went around the regions of Edom and
Moab. God did not allow them to fight against Moab, the nation of Ruth. But they
54 Old Testament Survey
conquered Sihon, King of Heshbon, and Og, King of Bashan. As they camped on
the plains north of Moab, God gave them further instructions for entering Canaan.
3.4
Deuteronomy: Centrality of the Covenant
The word deuteronomy comes from the Greek title of this book in the
LESSON Septuagint. deutero means “second,” and nomy is a form of the word law.
The book of Deuteronomy reviews the Law and covenant God gave to Israel.
Concerning its purpose, Hill and Walton state:
The book of Deuteronomy does not give a “second law” as the name suggests,
3.4.1
OBJECTIVE but rather provides an important summary of the history of the wilderness
summarize one lesson period and organization of the legal material. Framed in the words of Moses
from each of moses’s three shortly before his death, the book tries to give the Israelites a broad perspective
messages and his farewell. on the events of the previous generation as it affords the opportunity for the
renewal of the covenant. (2000, 131)
Outline
I. Moses’s First Message: History, 1–4:43
A. Review of Israel’s failures (1–3)
B. Encouragement to obey (4:1–40)
C. Cities of refuge (4:41–43)
II. Moses’s Second Message: Law and Love, 4:44–26:19
A. Covenant; Ten Commandments (4:44–11:32)
B. Laws for living in Canaan (12–26)
III. Moses’s Third Message: Blessings or Curses, 27–30
IV. Moses’s Final Words and Death, 31–34
A. Joshua’s commission (31:1–29)
B. Song and blessing of Moses (31:30–33:29)
Israel’s Early Years (Exodus–Deuteronomy) 55
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
3
CHAPTER
Book Theme
4
Conquest and Life in Canaan
(Joshua–1 Samuel)
CHAPTER
Moses’s exhortations throughout Deuteronomy had been clear: Be faithful
to God, keep Him central to every aspect of life, and you will be blessed. Turn
away from Him, reject His authority, and He will turn you over to your enemies
(Deuteronomy 30:15–18).
Had the Israelites remembered these key principles, their years of entering
and settling in Canaan would have been far more peaceful and far less volatile.
Yet, as the years passed, the people forgot the words of Moses. They became
more interested in their own pursuits than in the pursuits of their God.
Despite the Israelites’ faithlessness, however, God himself remained faithful
(see 2 Timothy 2:13). Although He punished the Israelites, He also raised up godly
people such as Joshua, Deborah, Jephthah, Samuel, and David to lead Israel back
to the worship of the one true God. As the story of Ruth illustrates so beautifully,
these first few historical books show the blessing that comes from remaining
faithful to God and loving Him with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength.
4.1
Joshua: Conquering Canaan
LESSON Author
According to Jewish tradition, Joshua is considered to be the author of the
book that bears his name. However, some internal biblical evidence indicates that
Joshua did not write certain sections of the book. How can this be reconciled?
4.1.1
OBJECTIVE Arnold and Beyer summarize the authorship evidence:
describe the author, setting, Joshua 24:26 suggests Joshua wrote at least part of the book, and Jewish
and purpose of Joshua. tradition names Joshua as the author. The account of Joshua’s death (24:29–31)
clearly indicates another author besides Joshua, at least for this section. The
1 Do we know who wrote common phrase “until this day” (4:9; 5:9; 7:26; etc.) suggests an extended
the book of Joshua? Explain amount of time has elapsed since the events described, though not necessarily
your answer.
an extremely long time. The mention of Jebusites in Jerusalem (15:63) suggests
a date prior to 1000 BC, when David conquered Jerusalem and drove out the
Jebusites (2 Samuel 5:6–10). The reference to Canaanites in Gezer (16:10)
implies a date prior to about 970 BC, when the king of Egypt conquered Gezer
and gave it to Solomon (1 Kings 3:1; 9:16).
When we look at all the evidence, it seems reasonable to conclude that much of
the book comes from eyewitness accounts, perhaps from Joshua’s own hand.
Furthermore, the historical references suggest the book was in its present form
no later than Solomon’s time. (1999, 169)
Outline
I. Entering Canaan, 1–4
A. Joshua becomes the leader (1)
B. Two spies go to Jericho (2)
C. Crossing the Jordan (3)
D. Setting up a memorial (4)
II. Conquering Canaan, 5–12
A. Preparing for the battles (5)
B. Central battles: Jericho and Ai (6–8)
Conquest and Life in Canaan (Joshua–1 Samuel) 65
unfortunate because just prior to the defeat of Jericho, “the Lord revealed to Joshua
that because the battle was His, only His methods could bring success” (Dyer and
Merrill 2001, 167, 169). When Joshua discovered the truth, he made the citizens of
Gibeon slaves, cursing them to “serve as woodcutters and water carriers” (9:23).
Later, when Gibeon was attacked, Israel came to fight and destroy the
Amorites. During the battle, Joshua prayed that the sun would stand still, and
God granted his request: “The sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed
going down about a full day. . . . Surely the Lord was fighting for Israel!” (10:13–
14). Having promised Joshua victory in this battle (10:8), the Lord also “hurled
large hailstones” on the Amorites, killing many (10:11).
In the central battles, then, Israel defeated Jericho and Ai. The southern battles
involved the Gibeonites’ deception of Israel and the defeat of the Amorites. In
the northern battles, Joshua turned his attention to defeating the Canaanites and
destroying the city of Hazor. Although Israel did not fully comply with Moses’s
instruction to remove all of the Canaanites, they did take possession of all of the land.
4.2
Judges: Settling Canaan
While the theme of the land settlement continues in the book of Judges, the
LESSON Judges account “emphasizes how much of the land was not conquered. It tells
how most of the tribes failed to take over their territories.” The book “begins with
a rather lengthy summary of the conquest of the land of Canaan” (Barnes 2003,
380) and details a volatile time in Israel’s history.
4.2.1
OBJECTIVE
explain israel’s cycle of Authorship and Date
failure during the time of Determining the human author of the book of Judges is difficult due to a lack
the judges, and give an of internal evidence in both the book itself and the complete biblical text. As a
example. result, many conservative scholars have concluded that the author is anonymous.
However, there is some evidence that Samuel may have authored the book:
Conquest and Life in Canaan (Joshua–1 Samuel) 67
According to the Babylonian Talmud (Baba Bathra 14b), Samuel wrote Judges
as well as 1 and 2 Samuel. Inasmuch as everything in the book chronologically
precedes Samuel’s death, this is a reasonable suggestion. The book itself offers
no clue to its authorship, however, nor is there internal witness to it elsewhere
in the Bible. It seems best to leave it as an anonymous composition. (Dyer and
Merrill 2001, 179)
The statement “In those days Israel had no king” occurs four times in Judges
(17:6; 18:1; 19:1; 21:25) and suggests that Judges was written after Saul became king
in 1050 BC. Since David took Jerusalem away from the Jebusites about 1000 BC
(2 Samuel 5:7), it is possible that Judges was written between 1050 and 1000 BC.
The title of the book describes those who ruled after Joshua. While it
appears that some of the judges ruled simultaneously, the book of Judges covers
approximately 325 years (1375–1050 BC). After this period, Eli and Samuel each
served forty years as judge and priest (1 Samuel 1–9). Taking this into account,
one could say that the period of judges lasted about four hundred years, as did the
period of the kings. During those four hundred years, Israel was a group of tribes,
and each tribe governed itself (Judges 2:10–14).
Outline
I. Conditions in the Time of the Judges, 1:1–3:6
A. Areas not conquered (1:1–2:5)
B. Israel’s cycle of failure (2:6–3:6)
II. Six Major Judges Who Delivered Israel, 3:7–16:31
A. Othniel—from Mesopotamia (3:7–11)
B. Ehud—from Moab (3:12–30)
C. Deborah and Barak—from Canaan (4–5)
D. Gideon—from Midian (6–8)
E. Contrast: Abimelech—the anti-judge (9)
F. Jephthah—from Ammon (10:6–12:7)
G. Samson—from Philistia (13–16)
III. A Time of Confusion, 17–21
A. Micah and his idolatry (17)
B. The Danites and their relocation (18)
C. Sin and civil war (19–21)
Although at times the Canaanites worked for Israel and paid taxes, whenever the
Israelites turned away from God, their enemies conquered them.
Gideon’s offering with fire (6:17–24); (b) twice, God confirmed His
promise of deliverance through Gideon’s fleece and the adjacent ground
(6:36–40); (c) knowing Gideon’s fear, the Lord sent him and his servant
to overhear a Midianite’s dream and the prophecy of Israel’s victory
(7:9–15). Despite Gideon’s foolish decisions later on, the Lord used his
leadership to deliver the Israelites from their oppression under Midian.
• Jephthah: deliverance from ammon (10:6–12:7). Because Jephthah was the
offspring of his father’s illegitimate affair, Jephthah’s brothers drove him
away from the family. However, when Jephthah later became “a mighty
warrior,” these same brothers sought his help in fighting the Ammonites and
promised to make him leader over all of Gilead. The Spirit of the Lord came
upon Jephthah as he went to battle, and he conquered the enemies. Before
the fight, Jephthah had vowed that if victorious, he would offer as a sacrifice
to God whatever came out of his house to meet him. When his daughter—
his only child—came out to greet him, Jephthah was in anguish, yet he had
no choice but to fulfill his vow and sacrifice his daughter.
• samson: deliverance from Philistia (13–16). Samson is perhaps one of
the better-known judges because of his unusual physical strength yet
weakness for Philistine women. The Spirit of the Lord gave Samson
strength to do many things, including tearing a lion apart with his bare
hands, striking thirty men from Ashkelon, and using a donkey’s jawbone
to kill a thousand men. After falling prey to the Philistines’ schemes
through Delilah, Samson prayed for supernatural strength one last time,
and the Lord enabled him to push a temple’s pillars so that the building
collapsed, killing himself as well as thousands of Philistines.
11 Who was Abimelech, and The remaining leader is Abimelech, also known as the anti-judge because he
what sets him apart from the was the opposite of the other judges God appointed. Unlike the six major judges,
other judges? he did not deliver Israel from any enemies, and unlike the six minor judges, his
story is given an entire chapter (Judges 9).
4.3
LESSON
4.3.1
Ruth: Providential Grace
While Judges ends on a negative note, Ruth presents a positive story of
lavish grace and providence in the midst of tragic life circumstances. The
story centers around three primary individuals: Naomi, Ruth, and Boaz,
OBJECTIVE though many consider Ruth to be the main character of the book (Arnold and
summarize the story of Beyer 1999, 187).
ruth, and apply lessons Ruth was a godly woman from the land of Moab. While the Law forbade
for us today. her to be part of the nation of Israel, her story demonstrates that God’s mercy
70 Old Testament Survey
is extended to every nation. Ruth, like Rahab, was a Gentile, and both were
ancestors of the Jewish Messiah.
Authorship
As with Judges, while the book of Ruth contains no internal evidence
concerning the author, Jewish tradition seems to attribute its authorship to Samuel:
The attachment of the Book of Ruth to the Book of Judges in the twenty-
two book arrangement of the Hebrew Bible implies common authorship or
compilation of the two books, supported by the Babylonian Talmud as well
(Baba Bathra 14b). There is no reason to reject the Jewish tradition that Samuel
was responsible for the whole, though admittedly there is no explicit internal
evidence to support it. (Dyer and Merrill 2001, 197)
Outline
In Ruth, “the four chapters are written almost like a four-act play. Each
chapter (or scene) has a clear opening and concluding paragraph, and each
revolves around an important dialogue. The chapters are organized around a
‘problem-solution’ framework” (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 187–188). This short
book can be outlined as follows:
I. Naomi and Ruth Move from Moab to Bethlehem, 1
II. Ruth Meets Boaz in His Field, 2
III. Ruth Talks with Boaz at His Threshing Floor, 3
IV. Boaz Redeems and Marries Ruth, 4:1–17
V. Genealogy: The Messianic Line Is Traced from Perez to David, 4:18–22
Setting
From the beginning phrase of Ruth 1:1, “In the days when the judges ruled,”
we know that the story of Ruth comes from the time of the judges. It opens as
a Jewish couple, Elimelech and Naomi, are leaving Judah because famine has
forced them to look for food. They travel to Moab, a nation east of the Dead Sea.
12 What is the importance The Hebrew names Elimelech and Naomi are rich in meaning. While Eli-
of the story of Ruth, and how melech means “my God is king,” Naomi means “pleasant.” Ironically, many of
does it apply to us? Naomi’s life experiences were not pleasant but bitter. Elimelech died in Moab
along with their two sons, who had married Moabite women. In fact, when she
eventually returned to Israel, Naomi said, “Don’t call me Naomi, . . . . Call me
Mara,” which means “bitter” (Ruth 1:20). However, the story of Naomi and Ruth
reveals that God is the Sovereign King over all and extends His mercy to all,
specifically to those who experience great suffering.
4.4
LESSON 1 Samuel: Kingdom Beginnings
In the Hebrew canon, 1 and 2 Samuel are combined into one book. First
Samuel records the point at which Israel turned from judges to kings, covering
three major leadership changes in approximately one hundred years—from
4.4.1
OBJECTIVE Samuel’s birth to Saul’s death (1105–1010 BC). It provides a historical link
analyze the setting, author, between the book of Judges and the books of the kings.
and purpose of 1 samuel.
Authorship
13 What does 1 Samuel
record, and over what period
The Babylonian Talmud credits Samuel with authorship of the two books that
of time? bear his name. However, Samuel dies and his death is mentioned twice before
14 Explain the title of the end of 1 Samuel. Most likely, his prominence in the first book was considered
1 Samuel. reasonable evidence for the title of both books (Raccah 2003, 410–411).
72 Old Testament Survey
Outline
I. Eli as Priest and Judge, 1–4
A. Birth of Samuel (1:1–2:11)
B. Sins of Eli and his sons (2:12–26)
C. Two warnings to Eli (2:27–3:21)
D. Judgment of Eli (4)
II. Samuel as Prophet, Priest, and Judge, 5–8
A. The ark restored to Israel (5:1–7:2)
B. Revival and victory under Samuel (7:3–8:3)
C. Israel asks for a king (8:4–22)
III. Saul as Israel’s First King, 9–15
A. Saul is anointed by Samuel (9:1–10:16)
B. Saul is praised after a victory (10:17–11:11)
C. Saul becomes king (11:12–12:25)
D. Saul fails to wait for Samuel (13:1–15)
E. Saul defeats the Philistines and others (13:16–14:52)
F. Saul disobeys at the Amalekite victory (15:1–35)
IV. David as National Hero, 16–31
A. David is anointed and kills Goliath (16–17)
B. Saul seeks to kill David; Jonathan befriends him (18–20)
C. David flees, and Saul hunts for him (21–26)
D. The Philistines give David refuge (27)
E. Saul consults a witch at Endor (28)
F. David recovers his family and wealth (29–30)
G. Saul dies (31)
Samuel taught, offered sacrifices, and cleansed the land from idols. Scripture
commends Samuel for acting in a godly manner. While serving a rebellious
people, he remained faithful and righteous.
When the nation of Israel saw that the nations around them had kings, they
wanted a king as well. Samuel instinctively realized that a human king would
become an idol in the eyes of Israel, replacing the true King, the one true God.
Nevertheless, even after Samuel’s dialogues with God, Israel rejected both
Samuel’s and God’s advice.
their families and possessions taken, David and his men pursued the raiders and
recovered everything. David went after the raiding party only after the Lord
assured him that he would be successful.
The final chapter of 1 Samuel records the fierce battle against the Philistines;
the deaths of Saul’s sons, including Jonathan; and Saul’s death by suicide. Yet,
despite the tragic ending and all the less-than-positive events in 1 Samuel, three
theological emphases emerge from this book:
18 What three theological First, the ancient promise of God that kings would issue from the Patriarchs
emphases are found in (Genesis 17:6; 35:11) is fulfilled. Second, the book reveals the error of
1 Samuel? attempting to run ahead of the promises of God and to bring to pass with
human effort what only God can and should do. . . . Third, the book teaches the
principle that the all-wise and all-powerful God is Sovereign and when nations
or individuals submit to His dominion, there is great blessing. (Dyer and Merrill
2001, 205–206)
Conquest and Life in Canaan (Joshua–1 Samuel) 75
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
4
CHAPTER
1. One purpose of the book of Joshua is to 6. Jephthah helped to deliver Israel from
a) show God’s provision and faithfulness. a) Moab.
b) recount the Israelites’ journey to Mount Sinai. b) Canaan.
c) demonstrate that God kept His promise to c) Philistia.
Abraham. d) Ammon.
d) summarize events that occurred at Sinai,
7. naomi literally means
Kadesh, and Moab.
a) “bitter.”
2. The Canaanites’ believed that heaven, earth, and b) “pleasant.”
childbirth were controlled by c) “my God is king.”
a) Baal. d) “barren.”
b) Asherah.
8. The book of Ruth communicates the message
c) Chemosh.
of God’s
d) El.
a) forgiveness and restoration.
3. Joshua’s military strategy for conquering Canaan b) desire for purity and holiness.
is known as c) redeeming grace.
a) blitzkrieg. d) judgment.
b) guerrilla warfare.
9. Who was the last judge to rule Israel?
c) surround and conquer.
a) Samuel
d) divide and conquer.
b) Gideon
4. The book of Judges emphasizes the Israelites’ c) Samson
a) steadfastness and faithfulness. d) Jephthah
b) complete fall into idolatry.
10. What characterized the reigns of both Saul
c) failure to conquer much of the land.
and David?
d) success in conquering Canaan.
a) Peace with surrounding nations
5. Which major judge was Caleb’s nephew and b) The sacredness of the office of king
fought the king of Aram? c) Their wholehearted service to God
a) Ehud d) Their godly character
b) Othniel
c) Jephthah
d) Samson
76 Old Testament Survey
11 Who was Abimelech, and what sets him apart from the other judges?
Abimelech was the opposite of the type of judge God usually appointed. Unlike the six major judges, he did not
deliver Israel from any enemies, and unlike the six minor judges, there is an entire chapter about him.
12 What is the importance of the story of Ruth, and how does it apply to us?
The story of Ruth reveals that God is the sovereign King over all and extends His mercy to all, specifically to
those who experience great suffering—a great application for believers today.
13 What does 1 Samuel record, and over what period of time?
First Samuel describes Israel’s transition from judges to kings and covers about one hundred years from
Samuel’s birth to Saul’s death.
14 Explain the title of 1 Samuel.
Although the Babylonian Talmud attributes authorship to Samuel, his death is mentioned twice before the end
of the first book. Most likely, his prominence in 1 Samuel was considered reasonable evidence for the title of
both books.
15 How does Scripture treat Samuel, and what were some of his accomplishments?
Scripture commends Samuel for acting in a godly manner. Samuel taught, offered sacrifices, and cleansed the
land from idols.
16 What is the one characteristic that applied only to the reigns of Saul and David?
Only in the stories of Saul and David are we told that the Spirit came upon them during their anointing.
17 First Samuel 16:5–13 emphasizes which characteristic of David?
His heart attitude, which pleased God
18 What three theological emphases are found in 1 Samuel?
(1) The fulfillment of God’s ancient promise that kings would issue from the patriarchs; (2) the error of trying
to run ahead of God’s promises and attempting with human effort what only God can and should do; (3) the
principle that the all-wise and all powerful God is sovereign and that nations or individuals who submit to His
dominion enjoy great blessing
5
78 Old Testament Survey
5.1
David’s Reign (2 Samuel, 1 Chronicles)
Author and Date
LESSON
In the previous chapter, we learned that 1 and 2 Samuel were together as
one book in the Hebrew Scriptures and that the author of the books is unknown.
While 1 Samuel covers about one hundred years from Samuel’s birth to Saul’s
5.1.1
OBJECTIVE
death (1105–1010 BC), 2 Samuel confines its coverage to David’s rule, a period
of forty years (1010–970 BC). Second Samuel may have been written late in the
analyze the political,
tenth century BC, after David’s death.
spiritual, and military
successes of david’s reign. Outline
The rule of David, whom many regard as the greatest of Israel’s kings, is
described in 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles. Providing many details of David’s reign,
2 Samuel is the only book that tells about the sin and rebellion in David’s family.
Meanwhile, 1 Chronicles lists the ancestors of the twelve tribes and shows that
David began a dynasty in Israel; it emphasizes David as a leader in politics and
religion and records his work in preparing to build the temple.
Event or Topic 2 Samuel 1 Chron.
I. David’s Political Success 1–5 1–10
A. Genealogies –– 1–9
B. David mourns Saul’s death 1 10
C. David’s seven years as king of Judah 2–4 ––
D. David as king over all Israel 5:1–5 ––
E. David conquers Jerusalem and makes 5:6–10 ––
it the national capital
II. David’s Spiritual Success 6–7 11–17
A. David makes Jerusalem a religious 6 13–16
center
B. God’s covenant with David 7 17
III. David’s Military Success 8–10 18–19
A. Victories over Philistia, Moab, Zobah, 8 18
Aram, and Edom
B. David and Mephibosheth 9 ––
C. Victory over Ammon 10 19
IV. David’s Sin as King 11:1–12:14 ––
A. David’s adultery with Bathsheba 11 ––
B. David’s rebuke from Nathan 12 ––
V. Judgment on David’s Household 12:15–15:6 ––
A. Death of David’s son from adultery 12:15–23 ––
B. Amnon’s rape of Tamar, his half-sister 13:1–22 ––
C. Absalom’s revenge and deceit 13:23–15:6 ––
VI. Judgment on David’s Kingdom 15–20 ––
A. Absalom steals the kingdom 15–17 ––
B. Absalom is murdered; David mourns 18:1–19:8 ––
C. David is restored; partly forgives 19:9–20:26 ––
Shimei
80 Old Testament Survey
have been achieved, they can easily be abused. David’s reveling in his military,
political, and spiritual successes may have played a role in his sin.
One night David walked out on his roof because he could not sleep. Upon
noticing a beautiful woman bathing, he desired her. At his inquiry, he learned that
she was Bathsheba, the wife of one of his soldiers, Uriah. David sent for Bathsheba
and had sexual relations with her. When Bathsheba informed him that she was
pregnant, David tried to manipulate Uriah into coming home and sleeping with
Bathsheba. When that did not work, David plotted to have Uriah killed on the front
lines of war. This plot succeeded, and Bathsheba became one of David’s wives.
Displeased, “the Lord sent Nathan to David” (2 Samuel 12:1). The prophet
told David a suspenseful story about a lamb, and David became so angry that he
demanded the offending party pay restitution and die. Nathan then shocked David
with the words, “You are the man!” (12:7).
5 How did David’s sin affect Judgment came not only on David and the succeeding generations of his
his family and the nation of family but also on his kingdom (2 Samuel 12–20). This judgment was marked
Israel? by the sword as well as discord within his family. Yet God forgave David and
took away his sin (12:13). Moreover, the Bible records that the Lord loved
Solomon (12:24) and that Christ came through the lineage of David through his
relationship with Bathsheba (Matthew 1:6).
How do we balance the biblical reality about the sinful failures of leadership
with the extension of God’s grace? This theological tension exists throughout the
Old and New Testaments.
David has frequently been put high on the pedestal of a spiritual giant. Yet David
committed a number of serious errors. These came, not from ignorance of what
is right, but from being impulsively driven by the need of the moment without
reflecting on the consequences. His lies cost people their lives (1 Sam. 22); his
temper “jeopardizes” his royal destiny (1 Sam. 25); his duplicity led him to execute
civilians (1 Sam. 27); his lust entangled him in a murderous plot (2 Sam. 11); his
unwillingness to take firm disciplinary action contributed to the bloodshed within
his family (2 Sam. 13–14); and his pride brought a pestilence that devastated the
land (2 Sam. 24). Yet God chose David and affirmed that he walked in accordance
to his law. David was loyal to the Lord and recognized when he had committed sin.
A balanced view of David recognizes his godliness, but realizes that, like any of us,
he was not immune to lapses in judgment. (Hill and Walton 2000, 224)
Perhaps David’s life is one of several reasons why the New Testament exhorts
believers to “watch yourself, or you also may be tempted” (Galatians 6:1).
David spent the last ten years of his life making plans and arrangements for
Solomon to build the temple. He instructed the priests and princes to recognize
Solomon as their new king. David’s last words, recorded in 2 Samuel 23:1–7,
sound much like a prayer or a psalm although they reflect on his relationship with
God. David died after serving as king for forty years.
5.2
Solomon’s Reign (1 Kings 1–11; 2 Chronicles 1–9)
LESSON Author, Date, and Purpose
Together, the books of 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings recount the
complete history of the kings, from Saul to Zedekiah, Judah’s last king, as well
as some of the better-known prophets of that time period. The author of 1 and
5.2.1
OBJECTIVE 2 Kings is unknown, but the books were likely finished about 560–550 BC.
describe solomon’s Like the books of Samuel, 1 and 2 Kings were one book in the Hebrew
beginning, building, and Scriptures. Covering a span of about four hundred years (970–560 BC), the
international relations. books were written for Jews exiled in Babylon to reveal God’s perspective on
Hebrew history and to explain reasons for the divided kingdom.
Outline
The first several chapters of 1 Kings and 2 Chronicles highlight the rule of
Solomon, David’s son. His reign can be outlined as follows:
Event or Topic 1 Kings 2 Chron.
I. Solomon Becomes King 1–4 1
A. Rise above Adonijah 1:1–2:46 ––
B. Wisdom from God 3–4 1:1–13
C. Trade and prosperity –– 1:14–17
II. Solomon’s Building Programs 5–9 2:1–8:16
A. The temple in Jerusalem 5–7 2:1–5:1
B. Solomon’s palace 7:1–8 ––
C. Dedication of the temple 8:1–9:9 5:2–7:10
D. Treaty with King Hiram of Tyre 9:10–25 ––
III. Solomon’s International Relations 9–10 8–9
A. Ships at Ezion Geber 9:26–28 8:17–18
B. Queen of Sheba 10:1–13 9:1–12
C. Money and trade 10:14–29 9:13–31
IV. Solomon’s Disobedience and Death 11 ––
A. Foreign wives and idolatry 11:1–8 ––
B. Judgment and enemies 11:9–43 ––
6 What kind of heritage did Solomon Becomes King (1 Kings 1–4; 2 Chronicles 1)
King David leave Solomon
with, and how did Solomon Peace and prosperity describe the golden years of Solomon’s rule. Under
enlarge on it? David, the nation had become united, had expanded its borders, and was
84 Old Testament Survey
5.3
LESSON
5.3.1
The Northern Kingdom (1 Kings 12–2 Kings 17)
After Solomon died, the people turned against the new king, his son
Rehoboam. As a result, the nation divided into two kingdoms. Ten tribes
OBJECTIVE
established the Northern Kingdom, or Israel, with Jeroboam as their king.
Name the five dynasties of Rehoboam reigned over the Southern Kingdom, or Judah, which consisted of
the northern kingdom. only two tribes: Judah and Benjamin.
86 Old Testament Survey
When Solomon tried to kill Jeroboam, Jeroboam fled to Egypt and stayed there
until Solomon’s death. He returned after Israel’s elders rebelled against Rehoboam,
and he became the first king of the Northern Kingdom. Jeroboam ruled for
approximately twenty-two years, during which he engaged in “continual warfare”
with Rehoboam (2 Chronicles 12:15).
10 What was the length in However, although God had promised to be with Jeroboam if he obeyed
time of Israel’s first dynasty, God’s commands, Jeroboam did not lead Israel in godly principles and practices.
and who were its kings? Rather, he led Israel away from God and introduced idolatry. He constructed
large golden calves, appointed new priests, and allowed the Israelites to offer
idolatrous sacrifices throughout the Northern Kingdom. Ahijah and an unnamed
prophet from Judah warned Jeroboam about his idolatrous sin and told him he
would lose his kingdom (1 Kings 13:1–14:20). When Jeroboam died, his son
Nadab ruled only two years, and the first dynasty ended after twenty-four years.
to death. Angry, the Lord prophesied through Elijah that He would destroy
Ahab’s family. When Ahab repented, God promised to delay part of his judgment
until after Ahab’s death (1 Kings 21).
Ahab was killed during a battle with Syria, and his son Ahaziah took over the
throne. Ahaziah reigned approximately two years (1 Kings 22:51). He died from
injuries suffered in an accident because he consulted idols rather than the one true
God (2 Kings 1).
Ahaziah’s brother Joram (also called Jehoram) became the next king and
ruled for twelve years. He was an ungodly king, although not as evil as his
parents, Ahab and Jezebel. As Joram recovered from wounds received in battle,
Elisha sent a young prophet to privately anoint Jehu as the new king of Israel
(2 Kings 9:1–13). Jehu then killed Joram and took over the throne. Overall,
Omri’s dynasty lasted about forty-seven years.
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
5
CHAPTER
12 Who was head of the evilest ruling family in Israel, and how long did this dynasty last?
Omri’s dynasty lasted about forty-seven years.
13 Who was the best-known and most sinful king in the third dynasty, and what famous Bible story occurred
during his reign?
Ahab’s reign included the story of Elijah’s confronting the prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel and God’s
answering Elijah in a spectacular, miraculous way.
14 Which dynasty ruled the Northern Kingdom longer than any other family, and how long did it last?
The dynasty of Jehu (fourth dynasty) lasted almost one hundred years of the Northern Kingdom’s two hundred
years of existence.
15 Which king was considered the Northern Kingdom’s greatest king, and why?
King Jeroboam II, the fourth ruler in Jehu’s dynasty, won back much of Israel’s land, made Samaria’s walls
larger, and brought peace and wealth back to Israel that had not existed since King Solomon.
16 What is most notable about Israel’s fifth dynasty?
The fifth dynasty (Menahem’s dynasty) was the last dynasty of the Northern Kingdom and lasted only fourteen years.
The Israelite Empire (2 Samuel, 1 and 2 Kings, 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles 1–9) 93
6
94 Old Testament Survey
6.1
Rehoboam to Ahaz: Judah during the Divided
Kingdom (1 Kings 12–22; 2 Kings 8–16;
LESSON
2 Chronicles 10–28)
Three Periods of the Divided Kingdom of Israel and Judah
6.1.1 Second Period
OBJECTIVE First Period Third Period
Kingdom (75 Years of
identify the three periods (60 Years of War) (75 Years of War)
Alliance)
of the divided kingdom.
Israel Jeroboam–Omri Ahab–Jehoahaz Jehoash–Hoshea
Outline
The events surrounding Judah during the divided kingdom are outlined as follows:
Event or Topic 1 Kings 2 Kings 2 Chron.
I. First Period: Sixty Years of War 12:1– — 10–16
with Israel 15:24
A. Rehoboam, Solomon’s son 12–14 — 10–12
B. Abijah, Rehoboam’s son 15:1–8 — 13:1–
14:1
C. Asa’s changes 15:9–24 — 14–16
II. Second Period: Seventy-five 22:41–50 8:25– 17–24
Years of Alliance with Israel 12:21
A. Jehoshaphat 22:41–50 — 17–20
1. Alliance with the Omri — — 18:1–
dynasty 19:3;
20:35–37
2. The prophets: Micaiah, — — 18–20
Jehu, and Eliezer
3. Elisha — 3:11–20 —
B. Ahaziah — 8:25–29; 22:1–9
9:27–29
C. Athaliah — 8:18, 22:10–
25–26; 23:21
11:1–20
D. Joash — 11–12 22:10–
24:27
III. Third Period: Seventy-five Years — 14:1–14; 25–28
of War with Israel 15–16
A. Amaziah — 14:1–14 25
B. Uzziah (Azariah) –– 15:1–7 26
C. Jotham –– 15:32–38 27
D. Ahaz, Father of Hezekiah –– 16 28
96 Old Testament Survey
later, the Syrians attacked Judah and Jerusalem anyway, wounding Joash. Joash’s
military officers rebelled against him for his treatment of Zechariah, killing him
in his own bed (2 Chronicles 24:23–26).
8 How long did the third Third Period: Seventy-Five Years of War (Amaziah–Ahaz)
period last, and how was it
characterized? Amaziah
Joash’s son Amaziah ruled for a total of twenty-nine years (796–767 BC),
9 Which king began with five of those years by himself and the remaining years with his son, Uzziah.
Judah’s third period, and what “Similar to earlier Judean kings, Amaziah . . . began his reign well” (Braddy
characteristic of his reign was 2003, 667) but did not end it well. Amaziah strengthened Judah’s army and
similar to earlier Judean kings?
challenged the Israelite army to a battle (2 Chronicles 25:17). In doing so,
Amaziah destroyed the peaceful relationship that had existed between Israel and
Judah for approximately one hundred years.
Israel then attacked Judah, and because its army was stronger, Israel’s
military might prevailed. The Israelites broke down part of the wall of Jerusalem,
captured King Amaziah and others, and confiscated gold and silver from the
temple. Sometime after King Jehoash of Israel died, Amaziah was released but
was killed in Lachish by some men from Judah (25:25–28).
Amaziah’s pride led to suffering for the Southern Kingdom. Judah’s national
hopes fell to the lowest point since Solomon’s kingdom divided.
Uzziah through Jotham
Uzziah (called Azariah in 2 Kings 15:1–7) began to rule while his father
was still living (791 BC) and reigned for a total of fifty-two years. Gradually,
he led the nation in a period of restoration that included rebuilding the walls
of Jerusalem and developing friendship and cooperation with Jeroboam II
and Israel. Uzziah developed a strong army and restored economic prosperity,
perhaps almost to the level known under the reigns of David and Solomon.
At first, Uzziah depended on God for the strength and power to accomplish
the needed changes. He had learned from the prophet Zechariah about the
importance of respecting and obeying God. According to 2 Chronicles 26:5,
“as long as he sought the Lord, God gave him success.”
However, “after Uzziah became powerful, his pride led to his downfall”
(2 Chronicles 26:16). Around 750 BC, after ruling for forty years, Uzziah violated
divine directives about worship by entering the temple to burn incense—a duty and
privilege reserved for the priests (Numbers 18:1–7). The high priest Azariah, along
with eighty other priests, rebuked the king and told him to leave the sanctuary.
This was no small rebuke! God judged Uzziah by inflicting him with leprosy, and
thereafter he lived alone in a separate house (2 Chronicles 26:19–21).
Archaeologists, excavating at Ramat Rahel just south of Jerusalem, believe
they have uncovered the dwelling of this leprous king. They found striking
proof of Uzziah’s illness on a marble plaque, called the “Epitaph of Uzziah.”
This plaque bears an inscription in Aramaic, dating to about the first century
AD It reads: “To here were brought the bones of Uzziah, King of Judah. Do
not open.” (Braddy 2003, 671)
Jotham, Uzziah’s son, began ruling with his sick father, and they co-reigned for
ten years until Uzziah’s death in 740 BC. In this same year, Isaiah answered the call
to be a prophetic voice of righteousness in Jerusalem. As Jotham ruled Judah, he
continued to oppose Assyria, who was threatening to attack. “Religiously his reign
was much like that of his father, with one exception: He carefully avoided any
The Southern Kingdom of Judah (1 and 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles 10–36) 99
interference with the priestly office. . . . Under Jotham’s influence, Judah became
prominent” (Braddy 2003, 671–672). “Jotham grew powerful because he walked
steadfastly before the Lord his God” (2 Chronicles 27:6).
Ahaz
Jotham’s son, Ahaz, began to rule Judah in 735 BC. Unlike his father, he
engaged in idolatry and befriended Assyria, who had become a dominant political
and military power. Assyria planned to conquer the entire land of Canaan. Until
the eighth century BC, Israel and Judah had not been truly threatened by other
empires, in spite of periodic battles with their neighbors. However, now “the
ominous Assyrian cloud on the horizon would become a thunderstorm bringing
judgment upon the nation of Israel” (Braddy 2003, 672).
10 Who was the final king Pekah (king of Israel) and Rezin (king of Syria) joined forces to battle
of Judah during the divided Assyria. Because Ahaz refused to join them, Pekah and Rezin also fought against
kingdom, and what was his Judah, killing many and taking thousands of captives.
tragic mistake?
Knowing that Ahaz and the people of Judah were shaken, the Lord sent Isaiah
to encourage King Ahaz not to be afraid but to trust in God alone (Isaiah 7:2–8).
Unfortunately, Ahaz ignored God’s counsel through Isaiah and turned to the
nation of Assyria for help. Although this brought quick results, ultimately it was
not beneficial.
After journeying to Damascus to meet with the victorious Assyrian king,
Ahaz’s idolatry increased. Previously, he had sacrificed his own children in
worship to idols—an evil practice that God thoroughly condemned (2 Kings 16:3;
2 Chronicles 28:3). Now, he rearranged the sacred objects in the temple and began
worshipping his false gods there (2 Kings 16:10–18). Later, “he shut the doors of
the Lord’s temple and set up altars at every street corner in Jerusalem”
(2 Chronicles 28:24). “Ahaz was the antithesis of Jotham in every way. His
spiritual models were the evil kings of Israel” (Dyer and Merrill 2001, 333).
As Judah struggled through the years of idolatry with Ahaz, divine judgment
came on Israel, just as God’s prophets had warned. Assyria cut through the land
like a razor (Isaiah 7:20) and flowed through the land like a river (8:7). Assyria
killed thousands of Israelites in the North and scattered captives throughout
Persia (2 Kings 18:10–11).
6.2
Hezekiah to Zedekiah: Judah, the Surviving
Kingdom (2 Kings 18–24; 2 Chronicles 29–36)
LESSON
Remember that the history of the kingdom of Israel can be divided into three
segments: (1) the united kingdom, (2) the divided kingdom, and (3) the surviving
kingdom. The following chart gives a little more detail about each of these periods:
6.2.1
OBJECTIVE
summarize the reigns of United Kingdom Divided Kingdom Surviving
hezekiah, manasseh, and Kingdom
Josiah. (North/Israel) (South/Judah) (Judah alone)
Saul, David,
Jeroboam through Rehoboam Hezekiah through
and Solomon
Hoshea through Ahaz Zedekiah
Only the Southern Kingdom of Judah survived the era of the divided
kingdom, continuing for about 150 years after the Northern Kingdom fell.
The surviving kingdom spans the era of eight kings and their reigns. Again,
the history is a mixture of the kings’ and the nation of Judah’s pleasing and
displeasing God.
Outline
The events and characters of the surviving kingdom may be outlined as follows:
Event or Topic 2 Kings 2 Chronicles
I. Hezekiah: A Righteous King 18–20 29–32
A. Judah returns to God 18:3–6 29–31
B. Hezekiah develops the nation 18:7–8 31:20–21
C. God saves Judah 18:13–20:37 32:1–23
D. Judah grows stronger 20:1–21 32:27–31
II. Manasseh: A Sinful King 21:1–18 33:1–20
A. Manasseh’s evil deeds 21:2–16 33:2–9
B. Manasseh’s repentance — 33:10–20
C. Manasseh’s son, Amon 21:19–25 33:21–25
III. Josiah: A Boy King 22:1–23:30 34–35
A. Religious revival 22–23 34–35:19
B. Huldah the prophetess 22:14–20 34:14–28
C. Jeremiah the prophet — 35:25
D. Josiah’s sudden death 23:29 35:20–27
IV. The Last Kings of Judah 23:31–25:30 36
A. Jehoahaz: 609 BC (3 months) 23:31–33 36:1–4
B. Jehoiakim: 609–598 BC 23:36–24:7 36:5–8
C. Jehoiachin: 598–597 BC 24:6–16 36:8–10
(3 months)
D. Zedekiah: 597–586 BC 24:18–20 36:11–14
E. Jeremiah and the last kings — 35:25
and was dug through 1,777 feet of solid rock. He also extended the wall of
Jerusalem around the Pool of Siloam. At the same time Hezekiah instituted
measures to protect the city from enemies, he exhorted the people to rely on the
Lord for divine protection (2 Chronicles 32:6–8).
In 701 BC, Sennacherib, king of Assyria, threatened Jerusalem and led his
army into Palestine to quench the anti-Assyrian rebellions. The Assyrian army
captured forty-six walled cities, including many strong cities in the kingdom
of Judah. Sennacherib demanded that Judah surrender to his powerful army,
but Isaiah urged Hezekiah to trust in the Lord. King Hezekiah and the nation
prayed, and in response to their prayer, God sent an angel who killed 185,000
soldiers and leaders in the Assyrian camp (2 Kings 19:35; Isaiah 37:36). An
embarrassed Sennacherib returned to his own country, and soon after, some of
his own sons killed him.
12 What happened to After this, Hezekiah became very sick. When the prophet Isaiah told
Hezekiah when the prophet Hezekiah he would die, Hezekiah turned his face toward the wall, wept, and
Isaiah told him he would die? prayed. God answered his prayers and added fifteen years to Hezekiah’s life
(2 Kings 20:1–11).
As word reached the surrounding nations about how God saved King
Hezekiah and Judah from Assyria, many sent valuable gifts to the king
(2 Chronicles 32:22–23). When the rulers of Babylon sent messengers with
gifts and encouraging letters, King Hezekiah welcomed them with open arms,
showing the visitors everything in his kingdom and the wealth in his storehouses.
Isaiah rebuked him for his pride, warning that judgment would come to Judah for
Hezekiah’s foolish action. He prophesied that one day Babylon would carry off
everything in the palace (2 Kings 20:12–19).
When Hezekiah died in 686 BC, the people of Judah honored him because
of his effective political and spiritual leadership (2 Chronicles 32:33).
Despite his faults, “Hezekiah trusted in the Lord, the God of Israel. There
was no one like him among all the kings of Judah, either before him or after
him” (2 Kings 18:5).
King Manasseh is a great example of God’s mercy. His life demonstrates that
God will forgive anyone who repents, even the worst of sinners.
Manasseh’s Son, Amon
When Manasseh died, his son Amon became king. Amon ruled for only two
years before his own officers killed him. He promoted and practiced idolatry,
once again leading the kingdom of Judah away from God.
and his three friends, Hananiah (Shadrach), Mishael (Meshach), and Azariah
(Abednego) (Daniel 1:1–7).
In 597 BC, Jehoiakim rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar. Not long afterward,
Jehoiakim was killed and his son Jehoiachin became king. The nature of
Jehoiakim’s death is uncertain, but he was killed “possibly in battle or
assassinated by political enemies” (Brubaker 2003b, 760).
Like his uncle Jehoahaz, Jehoiachin reigned only three months. Jehoaichin’s
reign “is labeled an ‘evil’ one by the writer of Kings” (Brubaker 2003b, 760).
In 597 BC, when Nebuchadnezzar again invaded Judah and marched his army
to Jerusalem, Jehoiachin surrendered. Nebuchadnezzar confiscated more wealth
and took Jehoiachin, craftsmen, and other leaders as prisoners—“a total of ten
thousand” (2 Kings 24:14)—including the prophet Ezekiel.
Nebuchadnezzar then selected Mattaniah, Josiah’s youngest son, to be his
puppet-king and changed his name to Zedekiah (2 Kings 24:17). Zedekiah
was the last king to rule over Judah in Jerusalem, but for eleven years, his
reign was merely as a servant to the nation of Babylon (2 Chronicles 36:11).
Meanwhile, the Egyptians constantly pressured him to join them in resistance
against Babylon. Zedekiah finally succumbed and agreed to this dangerous
military plan.
The last of Judah’s kings, Zedekiah, was another son of Josiah, perhaps
the worst of the lot. He rebelled against the Lord and Nebuchadnezzar
(36:13), and for the latter indiscretion he paid not only with his own life
but also . . . that of a great many of his fellow citizens. With fury, the
Babylonians came, decimating the population, robbing and destroying the
temple and city, and carrying off those who remained alive (36:17–20).
(Dyer and Merrill 2001, 339)
Zedekiah escaped to Jericho, but soldiers caught him, blinded him, put him
in chains, and took him to Babylon. The kingdom of Judah ceased to exist as a
nation. The people were now in exile:
In 586–582 BC, Babylon destroyed Judah and took the survivors into exile.
Thus, the night of exile settled over the Southern Kingdom. God’s judgment
on his people was complete. Both the histories of Kings and of Chronicles
reveal sad stories of what happened to a people and their kings when they were
consistently disobedient to God’s covenant. The words of God to Moses came
true. Violation of the commands of God brought death and a seventy-year
“night” of exile. (Brubaker 2003b, 763)
Yet hope in God remained, for the Exile would not last forever.
16 What is the benefit of Clearly, there is much to be learned from the history of both good and evil kings
studying both good and evil and periods of righteousness and idolatry. The purpose of these Old Testament
kings and the impact of their narratives is most likely both historical and theological. Theologically, the intent
reigns?
of this involved (and sometimes complex) history is to commend obedience out
of proper motives and to warn against disobedience. It also demonstrates the
sovereignty of God in spite of human mistakes, sin, and poor decisions.
Review all of the kings of Judah by studying the following chart. In regard to
years of reign, remember that sometimes one king’s rule overlapped another’s.
104 Old Testament Survey
Kings of Judah
Years of Relationship
King Character 1 Kings 2 Kings 2 Chron.
Reign with Israel
1. Rehoboam 17 Bad War 12:1–14:31 –– 10:1–12:16
8:25–29;
6. Ahaziah 1 Bad Alliance –– 22:1–9
9:27–29
7. Athaliah 8:25–28;
6 Bad Peace –– 22:10–23:21
(Queen) 11:1–20
10. Uzziah
52 Good Peace –– 15:1–7 26:1–23
(Azariah)
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
6
CHAPTER
1. Israel and Judah saw seventy-five years of political 6. When Assyria besieged Jerusalem, which
alliance in which period of the divided kingdom? prophet urged Hezekiah to trust in the Lord?
a) First a) Jeremiah
b) Second b) Isaiah
c) Third c) Zechariah
d) Fourth d) Amos
2. The first king of the Southern Kingdom was 7. Which king of Judah sacrificed children to
a) Asa. Molech in the valley of Hinnom?
b) Jehoshaphat. a) Manasseh
c) Jeroboam. b) Josiah
d) Rehoboam. c) Joash
d) Amon
3. Who immediately killed all his brothers once he
was made king of Judah? 8. Jeremiah wrote a lament in memory of King
a) Jehoshaphat a) Manasseh.
b) Asa b) Zedekiah.
c) Jehoram c) Josiah.
d) Abijah d) Joash.
4. When Athaliah tried to destroy David’s lineage 9. The last king to rule over Judah in Jerusalem was
through Jehoshaphat, God spared a) Josiah.
a) Asa. b) Jehoahaz.
b) Joash. c) Jehoiachin.
c) Jehoram. d) Zedekiah.
d) Jehoshaphat.
10. The purpose of the Old Testament narratives of
5. Which king helped to kill Zechariah, son of the kings is
Jehoiada? a) historical.
a) Joash b) theological.
b) Amaziah c) instructional.
c) Uzziah d) both historical and theological.
d) Jehoram
106 Old Testament Survey
13 What does King Manasseh’s life portray about God, and why?
Manasseh was considered the most wicked king Judah ever had (in addition to other horrors he committed, he
ordered Isaiah to be tied between two boards and sawed in half), but when he was taken to Babylon in chains,
he repented and returned to Judah to lead the people in serving the one true God. His life shows that God
forgives anyone who repents, even the worst sinner.
14 Describe King Josiah’s reign and its effects on Judah as a nation.
King Josiah sought the Lord, and at the age of twenty, he began to lead the nation back to God. During his
reign, he led a campaign to repair the temple, and the book of the Law was discovered. Because he and the
people sought God, the judgment of Judah was delayed.
15 Which kings were Josiah’s sons, and what characterized all their reigns?
Although Josiah was a godly king, all three of his three sons—Jehoahaz, Eliakim (renamed Jehoikim), and
Zedekiah, the last king to rule Judah—“failed to follow their father in obeying God.”
16 What is the benefit of studying both good and evil kings and the impact of their reigns?
It (1) commends obedience and proper motives, (2) warns against disobedience and (3) demonstrates God’s
sovereignty in spite of human mistakes, sin, and poor decisions.
7
108 Old Testament Survey
7.1
Ezra: The Rebuilding of the Temple
LESSON Authorship and Ezra the Person
Most scholars believe that a single author or editor compiled the books of
Ezra and Nehemiah. Both books contain several official lists. The books deal
with the same chronological time period and appear to be sequential. In addition,
7.1.1
OBJECTIVE the Hebrew canon combines them into one book called Ezra. Some Bibles still
discuss the author, purpose, refer to Ezra and Nehemiah as 1 Ezra and 2 Ezra. For these reasons, the two
and setting of ezra. books are studied together (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 264).
Ezra was a priest and a scribe. The scribes had numerous responsibilities,
1 With what does Hebrew including copying, studying, and teaching the Law. Hebrew tradition credits him
tradition credit Ezra? with organizing the entire Old Testament into the Hebrew canon.
The development of writing systems in the ancient Near East led to the rise
of a professional class of scribes, and this held true for Hebrew society in Old
Testament times. In preexilic Israel these official secretaries were key figures
in the religious and civil administration. . . . During the period of the Hebrew
monarchies the scribes functioned as “diplomats” in a way, since their expertise in
the languages and the literature of the day facilitated international correspondence.
. . . The Levites also served as scribes and recorders for the temple
(2 Chron. 34:13, 18). After the fall of the Hebrew monarchies, the scribal class
in postexilic Israel was tied solely to the temple and more narrowly focused as to
function. These temple scribes were essentially a class of scholars who devoted
themselves to copying, preserving, publishing, and interpreting the Law of Moses
for the Hebrew people. Ezra is often identified as the precursor of this scribal
class (Ezra 7:1–10). By New Testament times, the scribes formed a powerful and
religious political class in Judaism. They became major opponents of the ministry
of Jesus, accusing him of violating Jewish law (cf. Matt. 23:2). (Hill and Walton
2000, 278)
5 What is the primary Little is known about the exiles’ lives for the seventy years they were in Babylon.
setting of the book of Ezra? To return home, they had to travel approximately nine hundred miles, which took
110 Old Testament Survey
about four months. They arrived in Jerusalem to find that many Jewish family
members had been killed or scattered, and their homes, as well as the temple where
they had worshipped, had been burned. The book of Ezra describes the return of many
of the exiles and their struggles to rebuild the temple and restore their homeland.
Outline
I. The First Group Returns from Babylon, 1–2
II. At Home in Jerusalem, 3–4
III. The New Temple, 5–6
IV. The Second Group Returns from Babylon, 7–8
V. Reform, 9–10
idolatry and mixed heritage caused the Jews not only to reject the Samaritans’ help
with the temple but also to disapprove of intermarrying with them.
We must note that the issue against intermarriage was religious, not
racial. That is, God commanded the Jews not to marry Gentiles because they
worshipped idols and would turn the Jews away from Him (Deuteronomy 7:3–4).
God blessed mixed marriages in which the Gentile was God-fearing, however.
For instance, Boaz’s father Salmon married Rahab, and Boaz himself married
Ruth. Rahab and Ruth were both Gentiles, yet they were part of the lineage of
Jesus Christ (Matthew 1:5).
The returning Jews’ rejection angered the Samaritans. As a result, the
Samaritans hindered the Jews’ work on the temple for about sixteen years,
(536–520 BC). Ezra referred to the people of Samaria as enemies (Ezra 4:1), and
because of their opposition, it took twenty-five years to rebuild the temple.
2000, 273–274). The activities of the postexilic community continue in the book
of Nehemiah when the Jews rebuild the walls of the city.
Chronology of Events in Ezra and Nehemiah
Date (BC) Event Scripture
539 Cyrus the Persian conquered Babylon. Daniel 5:30
7.2
Nehemiah: The Rebuilding of the Walls
As discussed in the previous lesson, although the authorship of Ezra and
LESSON Nehemiah is largely unknown, many consider them to be the work of one
author or compiler. Ezra and Nehemiah lived and ministered at the same time as
the prophets Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi. For this reason, some scholarly
references study all of these books together.
7.2.1
OBJECTIVE Ezra and Nehemiah were contemporaries, albeit with different backgrounds.
analyze the character and Ezra was a scribe and priest. Nehemiah was involved in government as cupbearer
work of nehemiah. and confidant to King Artaxerxes of Persia and later governor in Israel. While the
book of Ezra concentrates on the rebuilding of the temple, Nehemiah’s writings
8 Who was Nehemiah, and emphasize the rebuilding of the walls around Jerusalem. Ezra led the second
what was his political position? group of Jews back to Jerusalem, and Nehemiah led the third and final group.
Outline
I. Nehemiah Sent by King Artaxerxes, 1:1–2:8
II. Nehemiah’s Mission in Jerusalem, 2:9–6:16
III. Ezra Brings Change, 7–10
IV. Nehemiah’s Program and Policies, 11–13
7.3
Esther: The Protection of the Nation
When Zerubbabel led fifty thousand Jews from the Persian Kingdom, many
LESSON Jews chose to stay in Persia. By that time, the Jews had been living in Babylon or
Persia for about one hundred years, and many like Esther or Mordecai had never
seen the land of Israel. Some estimate that approximately two to three million
Jews remained in Persia (Keil and Delitzsch 1976, 308).
7.3.1
OBJECTIVE Although the author of Esther is unknown, he may have been one of the
describe the main Jews who lived in Persia. The events described in Esther took place between
characters, ethics, and Zerubbabel’s and Ezra’s returns to Jerusalem; that is, the story occurred
theme of esther. between Ezra 6 and Ezra 7. Esther became queen of Persia in 478 BC, in the
The Postexilic Books (Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther) 115
seventh year of Xerxes (Esther 2:16), and reigned at least thirty years before
Nehemiah served in the Persian court.
10 Who were the main It would be difficult to find a more riveting, dramatic, and suspense-filled
characters in the book of plot in the pre-Hellenistic world than the book of Esther. Although the
Esther? book is in the center of a number of swirling controversies, they all fade
into the background as we are introduced to the colorful cast: pompous and
impressionable Xerxes/Ahasuerus, who is thwarted by his unruly and defiant
Queen Vashti and repeatedly manipulated by all; the diabolical archvillian,
Haman, and above all, the beautiful, wise, and courageous Esther at center
stage. (Hill and Walton 2000, 281)
11 What is a unique aspect Note that Esther is one of two books of the Bible that do not mention God’s
of the book of Esther? name (the other book is Song of Songs). For this reason, some have suggested
that Esther should not be part of the Old Testament canon. Yet God’s hand is seen
throughout the book. The author crafts the story so the message is clear: God is the
one who sovereignly protects the nation through the major characters in the book.
Outline
One possible outline of Esther focuses on the feasts celebrated: the feasts
of Xerxes (1:1–2:18), the feasts of Esther (2:19–7:10), and the feast of Purim
(8:1–10:3) (Brubaker 2003a, 828). However, we will use the following outline:
I. Esther Becomes Queen, 1–2
II. Haman Seeks to Destroy the Jewish People, 3–5
III. God Delivers the Jews through Esther, 6–10
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
7
CHAPTER
1. According to Jewish tradition, who organized 6. The man with exceptional organizational skills
the entire Old Testament Hebrew canon? who helped rebuild the walls of Jerusalem was
a) Nehemiah a) Ezra.
b) Ezra b) Zerubbabel.
c) Zerubbabel c) Zechariah.
d) Zechariah d) Nehemiah.
2. Cyrus’s permission for the Jews to return to 7. The theme of Nehemiah is the
Jerusalem was prophesied 160 years in advance by a) grace and forgiveness of the Lord.
a) Isaiah. b) judgment and wrath of God.
b) Jeremiah. c) rebuilding of the temple.
c) Zechariah. d) rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem.
d) Amos.
8. The events of the book of Esther took place
3. After Cyrus’s decree, who led the second group a) before the Jews returned to Jerusalem.
of Jews back to Jerusalem? b) between the first and second returns.
a) Ezra c) between the second and third returns.
b) Nehemiah d) after the final return of the Jews.
c) Zerubbabel
9. King Xerxes ordered a search for a new queen
d) Zechariah
because Vashti
4. Ezra 1–6 focuses on the return to Jerusalem a) rebelled and refused to obey him.
and the rebuilding of the temple, while Ezra 7–10 b) was old and unable to fulfill her duties.
describes c) was unable to have children.
a) the dedication of the priests. d) became ill and died.
b) Ezra’s journey and work.
10. Which feast celebrates the Jews’ deliverance
c) opposition from other nations.
from Haman and his plot?
d) Haggai and Zechariah’s prophetic ministry.
a) Trumpets
5. The Jews completed rebuilding the walls around b) Tabernacles
Jerusalem in how many days? c) Purim
a) Thirty d) Passover
b) Forty-eight
c) Fifty-two
d) Sixty-four
118 Old Testament Survey
12 Why was the name Purim chosen for the celebration feast?
The name Purim was chosen because it means “two or more lots.” It would remind them that Haman had used
a pur to choose a day to destroy them, but God was faithful and delivered them.
13 How would you describe the theme of Esther?
It could be described as God’s sovereignty and protection of His people and chosen nation. The book also
reveals the character of Queen Esther.
14 What details about Esther’s character emerge from the story?
God gave Queen Esther favor with everyone who saw her, she turned to the Lord through prayer and fasting,
she cared more about her people than her own life, she was very wise in the way she dealt with Haman, and
she was the person God used to deliver the Jews. In other words, she was honorable and gracious, spiritual,
unselfish and loving, discerning and wise, and a willing instrument of God.
8.1
Job: Perseverance in Suffering
LESSON Authorship and Date
The author and date of the book of Job are unknown. Some have speculated
that it was written during the time of Abraham, while others have suggested
various times up until the Exile. Those who believe the book may have been
8.1.1
OBJECTIVE written during Abraham’s time consider the following factors to be evidence for
describe the background their viewpoint:
and setting of Job and its • Job’s long life (about two hundred years) was common in the days of
possible authorship. Abraham, who lived 175 years (Genesis 25:7). Job lived another 140 years
after the events described in his book (Job 42:16).
1 What are some evidences • Job’s wealth, like Abraham’s, was measured by his animals (1:3; 42:12).
that the book of Job was
written during the time of • Job served as a priest for his family (1:5) as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob did.
Abraham? • In Job, God is called Shaddai (thirty-one times). This was the name for
God that Abraham and the other patriarchs used.
• The book of Job makes no reference to the law of Moses or any history of
the Israelites.
2 Are there enough clues Despite these factors, the clues as to the author and date of Job’s writing
in the book of Job to say are so minimal and so diverse that no firm conclusions are truly possible.
conclusively who authored it? Nevertheless, conservative scholarship agrees that the book of Job is inspired and
belongs in the canon of Scripture.
Setting
3 What is the setting for the According to Job 1:1, Job lived in Uz, a large area east of the Jordan. It included
book of Job? Edom in the south (Genesis 36:28; Lamentations 4:21) and Syrian lands in the
north (Genesis 10:23; 22:21). Thus, the story of Job took place in Arabia, not Israel.
While we are not told how Job came to place his faith in God, the Bible affirms that
Job “was the greatest man among all the people of the East” (Job 1:3).
Job’s friends Eliphaz, Bildad, Zophar, and Elihu apparently lived nearby
(Job 2:11). Eliphaz (an Edomite name) was from Teman, a city in Edom south
of the Dead Sea (Genesis 36:11; Jeremiah 49:7; Ezekiel 25:13; Amos 1:12;
Obadiah 9). Bildad was a Shuhite, perhaps signifying that he was a son of Shuah,
the youngest son of Abraham and Keturah (Genesis 25:2). We know little about
Zophar, but Elihu’s father was a Buzite (Job 32:2), possibly referring to Buz, an
eastern desert region (Jeremiah 25:23).
The book of Job is an inspired record of what took place between God, Satan,
Job, and Job’s four friends—Eliphaz, Bildad, Zophar, and Elihu. However, because
the individuals in the debate were of limited knowledge and God is the only
one who possesses infinite knowledge, not everything said in the book of Job is
theologically accurate. While it is important to read through every book of the
Bible in its entire context, this is especially true of the book of Job. The reader must
discern what God agrees and disagrees with in the ongoing events and conversation.
For instance, Satan lied about Job’s character and tenacity to persevere,
saying that Job would curse God if God removed his wealth (Job 1:11). But
Job remained faithful even when his wealth was destroyed. Although the Bible
accurately records Satan’s words, this does not mean that the words of Satan or
demons are inspired or true. Satan is clever, mixing truth and error as he did with
Adam and Eve (Genesis 3:4–5).
124 Old Testament Survey
Similarly, the Bible accurately records the discussion among Job’s friends,
but their words were also a mixture of truth and error. In the end, God rebuked
them and sent them to ask Job for prayer (Job 42:7–9). God told them, “You
have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has” (42:7). Job’s friends
attempted to correct and persuade Job by what they believed was true. However,
God insisted that they repent for their foolishness and folly (42:8).
8.1.2 Theme
OBJECTIVE
discuss insights from Job The term for the relationship of God’s goodness to human pain and suffering
concerning God’s justice is theodicy. How do we explain the problem inherent in theodicy? How do we
and human suffering. reconcile God’s being all powerful, all loving, and carrying out justice when we
often do not see justice effected in our lives and nations? How can a loving, good
God put up with the human problem of evil and suffering?
4 Identify four insights in Some individuals, particularly atheists and agnostics, reject any belief in God
the book of Job that relate to because they cannot reconcile this tension in their minds. Many believers also
the problem of theodicy. struggle with these questions. What a comfort it should be to believers that God
foresaw our human intellectual dilemma with this issue and devoted an entire
book of the Scriptures to it. Yet God does not give us a complete answer to this
dilemma for reasons that will not be known until eternity. Still, as the book of Job
wrestles with this perplexing issue, particularly in regard to the suffering of the
righteous, it provides several insights:
• God’s complete plan is not and will not be fully realized on this earth, but
only in the age to come in heaven. Some theologians call this the “already,
not yet” tension. That is, in one sense, God’s will is partially fulfilled now
(already) but will not be completely fulfilled until the future (not yet).
• Satan’s power is limited by God’s sovereign design. Satan can do nothing
without God’s permission (Job 1:12; 2:6); he is not God’s equal but a
created being. Satan does not have all power. Only God does!
• God tests and tries people. He also allows Satan to test and try people.
Although trials are extremely difficult to walk through, they teach us
valuable lessons and purify our faith. Because of his hardships, Job grew
in his faith and in humility (Job 42:1–10).
• Due to humanity’s fall in the Garden of Eden, we live in a sinful, fallen
world. Horrible things happen simply because we live under the curse
of sin (Genesis 3:14–19). Neither God nor Satan is responsible for such
events; nor are they caused by human will. Some trials are just part of
living in an imperfect world. Yet God is compassionate and walks with
the believer through every test, trial, and tragedy of life. Holding on to the
truth of God’s promises never to leave us and to be our Rock amidst life’s
storms helps to lessen the sting of the theodicy dilemma.
Outline
I. The Setting of Job’s Trials, 1–2
II. Talks between Job and His Three Friends, 3–27
III. Wisdom: Its Location, Value, and Meaning, 28
IV. Job’s Defense of His Innocence, 29–31
V. Elihu’s Four Speeches to Defend God, 32–37
VI. God’s Responses to Job, 38:1–42:6
VII. Job’s Restoration, 42:7–17
Humanity’s Appeals to God (Job, Psalms) 125
say but difficult to do. He did not appear to realize that what Job needed at that
moment was not self-righteous advice but empathy and concern.
Eliphaz believed that God cares for the innocent and judges the wicked (Job 4:3,
6–9). Therefore, according to Eliphaz, Job’s sickness must be a result of sin. Job’s
friend asserted that when people sin, they should welcome God’s discipline as the
pattern God uses to redeem them (5:17–20). Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar all shared
the belief that a person suffers because he or she has sinned. This is not God’s
viewpoint; rather, it is “Satan’s condemnation” (Brueggeman 2003b, 523).
In answer, Job observed that his friend’s words were worthless (Job 6:14–27).
Job was not looking for pat answers. Instead, Job spoke despairingly about his
painful life (7:3–8) and rhetorically asked why God appeared to be attacking him
by treating him in such a seemingly unworthy manner (7:11–19).
Bildad reprimanded Job for saying such things. Like Eliphaz, Bildad believed
in a cause-effect relationship between sin and suffering. He thought God had
allowed Job’s children to die because of their sin (8:4). In fact, he described
Job and all the wicked as plants without water or plants that try to root among
rocks instead of good soil (8:11–19). As soon as Job was again blameless, Bildad
asserted, God would restore his joy and laughter (8:20–22).
Job wanted to demonstrate that he was truly right with God but realized
he could not demand that his Maker and Judge explain himself (9:1–16). Job
believed that at times God treated the righteous just like the wicked. However,
proving such an assertion was not feasible (9:22) because there was no judge to
oversee and hear Job’s case (9:33–35).
Zophar’s reply was harsh; he was unjustifiably dogmatic and certain that his
comments were theologically accurate. He insisted that Job was lying about his
righteousness (11:3–4) and argued that if Job would only be persuaded to repent,
his darkness would turn into morning (11:17).
Job, in turn, maintained that he was indeed righteous. Job decided that his
friends’ assumptions were greatly flawed and that he would ignore their pious,
all-knowing advice. After all, God alone is truly wise and truly all-knowing. God
alone is all-powerful (12:1–6, 13–25). Acknowledging this, Job decided to move
ahead with his court case and complaint against God (13:1–19).
Second Cycle (Job 15–21)
In his second speech, Eliphaz attempted to refute Job’s complaint by lambasting
him and contending that Job’s words were windy and empty (15:1–6). He argued that
Job had rejected the wisdom of the elders and accused him of acting as though he had
secret knowledge from God (15:7–13). Eliphaz asserted that Job was purposefully
hiding his sin and wickedness (15:18–35). However, Eliphaz was wrong.
Both Bildad and Zophar supported Eliphaz’s presupposition that Job was sinful.
Bildad warned Job that the fate of the wicked is trouble and, in the end, death
(18:5–21). Zophar grouped Job with the wicked who would encounter God’s
burning anger (20:4–29). All three friends continued to believe that God was
disciplining and judging Job for sins he had committed in order to persuade him to
repent.
Since his friends refused to believe him, Job began speaking directly to God.
His style of speech in these chapters is similar to the lament psalms in that he
lamented his physical condition and spoke openly and honestly to God about his
negative feelings and current circumstances. He brought charges against God,
contending that God had brought trouble on him while he was at peace. God
Humanity’s Appeals to God (Job, Psalms) 127
had attacked him on every side, treating him like an enemy (16:7–17). Job cried
out for someone to see his trials and identify with him in his pain (16:18–22).
As far as comforting him, Job’s friends were useless. Job believed the righteous
would be shocked at how God had treated him (17:1–10; 19:1–12). People acted
like he was a social outcast. Even his wife, servants, and friends despised him
(19:13–22). His hope was that God would keep a record of his suffering and that
his Redeemer would justify him in the end (19:23–27).
Third Cycle (Job 22–27)
Eliphaz’s last speech was much like his first two. He insisted that the list of
Job’s sins was endless (22:5). He accused Job of stealing clothes, not giving
water or food to the needy, and refusing to help widows and orphans (22:6–9).
Eliphaz contended that these numerous sins explained Job’s intense suffering.
He urged Job to repent so that God could and would restore him (22:21–30).
Affirming Eliphaz’s beliefs, Bildad questioned whether any person can truly be
pure in God’s eyes (25:1–6).
Yet Job did not agree with his friends’ faulty assumptions. Whereas they
believed God always blesses the righteous and judges the wicked, Job claimed
there was significant evidence to the contrary. Many wicked people were happy
and rich and appeared to have no troubles (21:7–34; 24:1–17). Job wanted God to
explain His justice or, more accurately, what appeared to humans to be a lack of
justice. He knew that humans could not always fully understand God (26:5–14).
But Job wanted God to tell him why he suffered so much, why God was judging
him, when he was truly innocent (27:1–6). Even his friends thought he must be
wicked (27:7–23). What could he tell them? How could he defend himself? His
situation seemed hopeless.
Job Searches for Wisdom and Defends Himself (Job 28–31)
Job ended the discussion with his friends by giving four summarizing speeches.
The first was essentially a short poem that compared the search for wisdom with
the search for jewels and precious metals (Job 28). Both jewels and wisdom “can
be extracted only by arduous and even dangerous labor. They are hidden and
therefore of no practical value until they are found and brought to light (28:1–11)”
(Dyer and Merrill 2001, 391). Wisdom is the most valuable, although we do not
fully understand its worth (Job 28:13). People dig deep into the earth for gold and
other precious stones, “but where can wisdom be found?” (28:12). Wisdom appears
hidden from individuals; God alone knows where wisdom dwells (28:20–28).
In the other three summarizing speeches, Job defended his innocence before
God and humanity (29–31). Since Job’s debate with his friends ended in total
frustration, he gave one final, brief statement of his case. God had indeed blessed
him in the past, and he had been a respected man in society (29:1–25). But now
people mocked and dishonored him. God was apparently attacking him
(30:1–31), yet Job was innocent (31:1–40). Job wanted God to explain how this
could be truly just from a divine perspective.
Elihu claimed that Job erred in saying that God did not answer his complaints.
Elihu asserted that God speaks through visions, dreams, pain, and even angels
(33:14–15, 19, 23). Throughout the discourse, Elihu defended God’s seeming
silence by emphasizing His sovereignty and power.
8.2
Psalms: Israel’s Hymnbook and Prayer Book
Many of the psalms were set to music and were intended for both public
LESSON and private worship. As a result, the introductions of some, such as Psalms 4
and 5, include notes for the choir leader. Several psalms encourage singing (for
example, Psalm 95:1–2; 96:1–2; 98:1, 4–6), while others call for musicians
to praise God with their instruments (for example, 33:2; 98:5–6; 108:1–2;
8.2.1
OBJECTIVE 150:3–5). Old Testament believers sang psalms in the temple: “Enter his gates
discuss the historical with thanksgiving and his courts with praise” (100:4). “These special places of
background of the book of God’s presence are places of intimate and at times fearful encounter with the God
Psalms, including authors of the universe. They are places which demand human response; they demand
and dates. worshipful prayer. The Psalms are such a divine-human encounter, and they find
their actual setting within the formal worship of Israel” (Longman 1988, 11).
Throughout the centuries since ancient Israel, the psalms have been used in
many worship contexts, both formal and informal. Regardless of theological
position or worship style, many churches have employed the psalms in their
public worship services. “Many contemporary hymns (not to speak of more
traditional hymns) are based on passages from the Psalms. Churches with a
liturgical bent incorporate a responsive reading from the Psalms into the order of
worship” (Longman 1988, 12). In responsive readings, the pastor or leader says
one line or one verse, and the congregation responds in unison with the next line
or verse. For instance, Psalm 136 has been used as a responsive reading in which
the worship leader reads the first line of each verse and the people respond with
the refrain, “His love endures forever.”
desperation for deliverance from enemies. Yet the psalms also express our
praise, worship, and elation for who God is and what He has done.
• The New Testament quotes the book of Psalms 186 times—far more
than it quotes any other Old Testament book. Jesus and the writers of
the New Testament often used the psalms to teach doctrine and godly
practices. “Paul provides us with one-third of the total quotations of the
Old Testament in the New Testament. One-fifth of his citations are from
the Psalms” (Longman 1988, 65). “While the Psalms are not ‘doctrinal
treatises,’ the Psalms do teach doctrine” (Longman 1988, 52).
• The psalms involve forms of Hebrew poetry. Humans tend to closely
identify with the emotions expressed in poems. Poetry “stimulates our
imaginations, arouses our emotions, feeds our intellect, and addresses our
wills” (Longman 1988, 92).
In the Psalms, the writings after the psalm numbers but above the actual psalms
are called superscriptions (super means “above,” and scriptions means “writings”).
A total of 116 psalms have these superscriptions. For example, Psalm 48 has the
following designation: “A song. A psalm of the sons of Korah.” Scholars have
determined that the superscriptions were not part of the original psalms; however,
they were written before 200 BC, when the Hebrew Bible was translated into
Greek (the Septuagint). The superscriptions note important information such as
the author’s name, the type of psalm, musical terms, and type of service (such as a
wedding). Some include historical notes, as in the superscription above Psalm 3: “A
psalm of David. When he fled from his son Absalom.”
8.3
LESSON
Psalms: Categories of Psalms
Some have suggested that the psalms can be classified in up to thirteen different
8.3.1 categories. However, most current conservative scholars prefer to divide the psalms
OBJECTIVE into only seven categories or genres. Genre means “a group of texts similar in
describe the seven main their mood, content, structure, or phraseology” (Longman 1988, 20). The seven
categories or genres of genres of psalms are (1) hymns, (2) laments, (3) thanksgiving psalms, (4) psalms of
psalms. confidence, (5) psalms of remembrance, (6) wisdom psalms, and (7) kingship psalms
(Longman 1988, 24–34; Brueggeman 2003b, 526–529). Arnold and Beyer suggest
11 What are the seven main a similar list: hymns, penitential psalms, wisdom psalms, royal psalms, messianic
categories of psalms and psalms, imprecatory psalms, and lament psalms (1999, 307–312). For the purposes
their definitions?
of this study, however, we will use Longman and Brueggeman’s categories.
• hymns are recognized by “their exuberant praise of the Lord. The psalmist
pulls out all the stops in his rejoicing in God’s goodness. His praise is
exuberant because the psalmist is very conscious of God’s presence”
(Longman 1988, 24). Example: Psalm 113
132 Old Testament Survey
• Laments cry out to God for divine assistance in the unfairness of life’s
circumstances, trials, and tests. The lament honestly expresses the
believer’s true feelings when God seems nowhere or when God himself
appears to be unfair. At times, the individual even asks God to destroy
his enemies. According to Longman, the Psalms contain “three types of
complaints. 1. The psalmist may be troubled by his own thoughts and
actions. 2. He may complain about the actions of others against him
(the ‘enemies.’). 3. He may be frustrated by God himself” (1988, 26).
Example: Psalm 137
• The thanksgiving psalms are more than simple expressions of gratitude to
God. They are in reality “a response to an answered lament” (Longman
1988, 30). Example: Psalm 30
• Psalms of confidence express trust in God’s goodness and power
(Longman 1988, 30; Brueggeman 2003b, 528). Examples: Psalms 16, 23
• Psalms of remembrance express gratitude for what God did in the past.
They specifically pay attention to “the great redemptive acts of the past”
such as the Exodus (Longman 1988, 32). Example: Psalm 78
• The wisdom psalms emphasize a contrast between righteous patterns and
wicked patterns of living and their consequences (Longman 1988, 33).
Examples: Psalms 1, 37
• Kingship psalms can be divided into two categories: those that discuss
human kingship and those that discuss God as the King over all (Longman
1988, 34). The divine kingship psalms “extol God’s rule” (Brueggeman
2003b, 529); that is, they affirm God’s reign and sovereignty. Examples:
Psalms 45 (human kingship), 47 (divine kingship)
As seen in the different genres, the psalms emphasize various theological
themes. Nevertheless, “the overwhelmingly predominant theological thrust of
the book of Psalms is its God-centeredness” (Dyer and Merrill 2001, 405). This
is reflected in the fact that the psalms are cries, prayers, and songs crafted by
humans under divine inspiration but addressed specifically to God. The psalms
are a great tool to help believers engage in God-centered worship.
Humanity’s Appeals to God (Job, Psalms) 133
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
8
CHAPTER
1. Reading a book of the Bible in its entire context 6. What kind of parallelism is illustrated in Psalm
is especially important for the book of 2:1? “Why do the nations conspire and the people
a) Proverbs. plot in vain?”
b) Psalms. a) Antithetic
c) Job. b) Synonymous
d) Lamentations. c) Synthetic
d) Chiasm
2. Theodicy deals with the issue of
a) why the righteous suffer. 7. What kind of parallelism is illustrated in Psalm
b) the consequences of sin. 19:10? “They [ordinances of the Lord] are more
c) gossip and slander. precious than gold, than much pure gold.”
d) God’s forgiveness. a) Antithetic
b) Synonymous
3. The last and youngest person that contended
c) Synthetic
with Job about the cause of his suffering was
d) Chiasm
a) Eliphaz.
b) Bildad. 8. Psalms 42–72 parallel the book of
c) Zophar. a) Genesis.
d) Elihu. b) Exodus.
c) Leviticus.
4. The book of Job deals with the themes of
d) Deuteronomy.
a) forgiveness, judgment, and justice.
b) wisdom, judgment, and injustice. 9. The lives of the righteous and the wicked are
c) wisdom, justice, and sovereignty. contrasted in
d) forgiveness, judgment, and restoration. a) laments.
b) hymns.
5. A good example of a responsive reading is Psalm
c) psalms of confidence.
a) 1.
d) wisdom psalms.
b) 32.
c) 100. 10. Cries for divine assistance in the unfairness of
d) 136. life’s circumstances are expressed in
a) laments.
b) hymns.
c) psalms of confidence.
d) wisdom psalms.
134 Old Testament Survey
10 How do the five sections of Psalms parallel the five books of the Pentateuch?
(a) Psalms 1–41 parallel Genesis; common topics: humans and Creation. (b) Psalms 42–72 parallel Exodus;
common topics: deliverance and redemption. (c) Psalms 73–89 parallel Leviticus; common topics: worship
and the temple. (d) Psalms 90–106 parallel Numbers; common topics: the desert and God’s ways. (e) Psalms
107–150 parallel Deuteronomy; common topics: God’s Word and praise.
11 What are the seven main categories of psalms and their definitions?
(1) Hymns: exuberant praise of the Lord. (2) Laments: cries to God for divine help in the unfairness of
life’s circumstances, trials, and tests. (3) Thanksgiving psalms: gratitude to God and a response to an
answered lament. (4) Psalms of confidence: expressions of trust in God’s goodness and power. (5) Psalms of
remembrance: expressions of gratitude for what God did in the past. (6) Wisdom psalms: contrasting patterns of
righteous living and wicked living; showing the consequences of the two. (7) Kingship psalms: descriptions of
human kingship and divine kingship that extol God as King over all, affirming God’s reign and sovereignty.
9
136 Old Testament Survey
9.1
Proverbs
The parallelism studied in the last chapter also characterizes the other wisdom
LESSON books, particularly Proverbs. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, proverbs (short
sayings generally intended to teach about life) were quite common, and they
remain popular in many non-Western cultures today. However, proverbs are
intended only as generalizations and not necessarily hard, fast rules. In other
9.1.1
OBJECTIVE words, the results of a proverb are not guaranteed or automatic; they are not
summarize the absolute. Still, a wise person heeds the warnings and instructions of proverbs.
characteristics of Proverbs. The proverbs included in the Bible are didactic in nature, meaning they are
designed and intended to teach the common citizen, particularly the believer, the
best and wisest way to live.
Characteristics
2 Identify several Key facts about Proverbs include the following:
characteristics of Proverbs. • The Hebrew word mashal means “wise speech, parable, proverb, or wise
saying.” Proverbs 1–9 contains thirteen such short talks or speeches.
• In the longest part of the book (10:1–22:16), most proverbs are two lines
that show contrast or comparison.
• Although many proverbs describe the result of an action or characteristic,
proverbs are not laws or guarantees. Rather, they describe what usually
happens.
• The proverbs apply to all cultures.
• Some proverbs use numbers for emphasis: “There are six things the Lord
hates, seven that are detestable to him” (6:16); “There are three things that
are too amazing for me, four that I do not understand” (30:18).
138 Old Testament Survey
• Some proverbs are direct: “Go to the ant, you sluggard; consider its ways
and be wise!” (6:6); “Pay attention and listen to the sayings of the wise”
(22:17).
• Many proverbs teach that we should trust in the Lord: “Trust in the Lord
with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding” (3:5).
Outline
I. The Purposes and Theme of Proverbs, 1:1–7
II. Wise Sayings for Youth, 1:8–9:18
III. The Main Collection of Solomon’s Wise Sayings, 10:1–22:16
IV. Wise Sayings from Other Wise Men, 22:17–24:34
V. Solomon’s Wise Sayings Recorded by Hezekiah’s Scribes, 25:1–29:27
VI. Wise Sayings of Agur and Lemuel, 30:1–31:9
VII. Epilogue: Wise Sayings about the Virtuous Wife, 31:10–31
word of God, for extracanonical and even non-Israelite writings are commonly
cited by biblical authors (for example, Josh. 10:13; 2 Sam. 1:18; 1 Kings 11:41;
Acts 17:28; Titus 1:12). (Dyer and Merrill 2001, 495)
9.2
Ecclesiastes
LESSON Author and Date
A number of “traditional Jewish and Christian interpreters” attribute the
authorship of Ecclesiastes to Solomon. Some of these scholars believe Solomon
wrote the book after he had turned away from God (Brueggeman 2003b, 538).
9.2.1 However, the evidence that Solomon authored Ecclesiastes is sketchy at best
OBJECTIVE and certainly rather inconclusive. Most scholars, including conservative ones
discuss the background who affirm the inspiration of Scripture, admit that we do not know who wrote
of ecclesiastes, including Ecclesiastes and that even the internal evidence in the book itself is not sufficient
date, setting, and possible to arrive at a reasonable conclusion.
authorship.
The phrase “son of David, king in Jerusalem” and certain passages like 1:16–17
are clearly meant to remind the reader of Solomon. . . . Yet the boast that he had
6 What is the best
surpassed all who preceded him on the throne is rather weak if his father David
conclusion regarding the author
and date of Ecclesiastes? was his only predecessor. Since the book nowhere claims Solomon as its author,
it is better to leave the matter unsettled. (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 330)
The date of the book’s writing is uncertain as well. Some scholars point to a
rather late date because of perceived Aramaic-type sayings called Aramaisms.
However, others point out that since these sayings are also found in preexilic
literature, an early date is certainly conceivable. Some have suggested a date
around 930 BC, but, again, “it is best to leave the matter unsettled” (Dyer and
Merrill 2001, 504).
Title
In the Hebrew Scriptures, the title of this book is Qoheleth, meaning “one who
calls a group of people together and speaks to them.” In the Septuagint, the Hebrew
qoheleth was translated into a Greek word with the same meaning: ekklesiastes.
This is based on the Greek word ekklesia, referring to “a group or assembly called
together.” The New Testament translates the word ekklesia as “church.”
Some scholars and some translations of the Bible render qoheleth as “teacher”
or “preacher.” However, others think that the concept of a lecturer speaking to
an assembly of people is a more appropriate concept or translation (Brueggeman
2003b, 538).
Outline
I. Introduction of the Problem, 1:1–11
II. Meaninglessness, 1:12–2:26
III. Time, 3
IV. Society, 4
V. Worship and Wealth, 5–6
VI. Wisdom, 7:1–8:1
VII. Justice, 8:2–9:12
VIII. More on Wisdom, 9:13–11:6
IX. Conclusion and Solution to the Problem, 11:7–12:14
9.3
LESSON
9.3.1
Song of Songs
As mentioned in the previous lesson, phrases such as king of kings emphasize
supremacy or superiority, so that King of kings refers to the greatest King. Thus,
OBJECTIVE song of songs means the greatest song. Some Jewish and Christian scholars
discuss the background of believe that it was composed to be sung at weddings and is the greatest wedding
song of songs, including song ever written. It is one of the five scrolls in the Holy Writings (hagiographa
possible authorship and in Greek), which is the third part of the Hebrew Scriptures. The Jews publicly
dates. read the book at the Feast of Passover (Hill and Walton 2000, 374).
144 Old Testament Survey
Outline
I. Poem 1: The Bride Longs for Her Groom, 1:1–2:7
II. Poem 2: The Lovers Seek and Find Each Other, 2:8–3:5
III. Poem 3: The Wedding Procession and Marriage, 3:6–5:1
IV. Poem 4: The Bride Fears She Will Lose the Groom, 5:2–6:3
V. Poem 5: The Groom Describes the Bride’s Beauty, 6:4–8:4
VI. Poem 6: The Nature of Love, 8:5–14
9.3.2 Overview
OBJECTIVE
identify the generally Throughout the centuries, the explicit sexual imagery and words of Song of
accepted purpose for song Songs have disturbed and discomforted some. This has resulted in a variety of
of songs. perspectives regarding the book’s intents and interpretations. Some wonder whether
the book should be included in the canon of Scripture. Others have explained the
images away by proposing various allegorical and typological interpretations. For
the purposes of our study, we will consider three views concerning Song of Songs:
• In the beginning, Jews did not attempt to discover so-called hidden
meanings in Song of Songs. Rather, they believed the book was about the
beauty of sexual intimacy in marriage. In the Garden of Eden, before sin
entered the world, God created Adam and Eve. Neither He nor they were
embarrassed that the humans were naked (Genesis 2:25). God saw that all
He had made was very good, including human sexuality (1:31). Therefore,
Divine Appeals to Humanity (Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs) 145
to the Israelites, Song of Songs celebrated the love of a husband and wife.
Human sexuality is a gift from God that, like anything else, can be used
properly or abused. Physical and emotional joy in marriage was God’s
idea. For this reason, the Jews read Song of Songs at each Passover Feast.
• Later, some individuals thought that the book’s focus on the beauty of
the human body was sinful and that it promoted lustful thoughts. They
developed what they believed to be more spiritual ways to read the book
and promoted it as a symbol of God’s love for Israel. This is an example
of a more allegorical or typological approach to interpretation. In doing so,
however, these individuals chose to ignore the book’s historical background
as well as its more obvious literal sense. In the first century AD, Rabbi
Aqiba began to teach that the Shulammite woman represented the nation of
Israel, and throughout the years, other rabbis began to do likewise.
• Although the New Testament never quotes from the books of Esther or Song
of Songs, it appears that, in agreement with the Jews, the early believers
saw Song of Songs as a book about love in marriage. Then, about AD 200,
a man named Hippolytus said that the bride in Song of Songs stood for the
church (Lint 1998, 480). In the third century, a church leader named Origen
greatly emphasized allegory, a literary device that uses symbols to represent
truths about life (Ryken and Longman 1993, 281). That is, Origen tried to
find a hidden, spiritual meaning in almost everything. Song of Songs is one
of the shortest books in the Bible, with only 117 verses, yet Origen wrote
ten books of allegory on what he thought were hidden meanings in Song of
Songs. Looking for allegories in Scripture is risky because we can create
meanings that God never intended. We should use allegorical interpretations
only when Scripture itself uses allegory, such as in Paul’s reference to Hagar
and Sarah in Galatians 4.
13 What is the best With these historical perspectives in mind, how should today’s believer view
interpretation of Song of Song of Songs? The best way to interpret this book is in its literal, natural sense,
Songs? which affirms and encourages the celebration of sexual relations within the bonds
of marriage. Song of Songs upholds the fact that sex between a husband and wife
is a gift from God. “The provocative sexual imagery in the Song of Solomon is
straightforward love poetry. But Jewish and Christian interpreters have labored
to find a more ‘spiritual’ message in the book . . . . [However,] to choose a
natural approach to the book does not mean we must adopt a non-theological
perspective” (Brueggeman 2003b, 541–542).
It is often argued that such themes are unworthy of being treated in Scripture,
since the focus of the biblical material is on the redemption from sin, and by
definition, “sexuality is sinful.” However, even a casual reading of the Old
Testament should reveal that this equation was never made by the biblical
writers. It is illicit sexuality that is condemned, not sexuality per se. From the
creation story in Genesis 1–2 to the marriage of the Lamb in Revelation 21,
human sexuality is presented as a specific gift from God to his creation. . . . The
creation of mankind in the image of God, yet created male and female (i.e., as
sexual beings) for the purpose of procreation (Gn. 1:28), fellowship, mutual
support and dependence (Gn. 2:18), and physical as well as spiritual unity (Gen.
2:22–24), should be clear evidence that God’s action of creating us as sexual
beings was no accident or compromise. It was the divine intention from the
beginning, and is, in fact, ‘good’ (Gn. 1:31). (Carr 1984, 34–35)
14 What does Song of Thus, although some believers try to avoid the topic of sex altogether or
Songs teach us? claim that all sex is sinful, the Bible takes a pure and balanced approach to
146 Old Testament Survey
sexual relations within marriage. While many cultures have profaned God’s
gift of sexuality, the biblical approach not only validates the beauty of sexuality
within the purpose of God’s design but also warns against the dangers of its
abuse. Song of Songs uses erotic sexual imagery to convey to us the beauty and
truth that God’s approach to sexuality is pure, appropriate, and encouraged in
a marital relationship because everything God created was good. “The book
models mutually submissive sexual behavior between a loving couple. It affirms
a wholesome delight in the marriage bed” (Brueggeman 2003b, 545).
The Song, therefore, is didactic and moral in its purpose. It comes to us in this
world of sin, where lust and passion are on every hand, where fierce temptations
assail us and try to turn us aside from the God-given standard of marriage. And
it reminds us, in particularly beautiful fashion, how pure and noble true love is.
(Young, as cited in Carr 1984, 35–36)
Divine Appeals to Humanity (Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs) 147
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
9
CHAPTER
1. The entire book of Proverbs was likely 6. According to Ecclesiastes, the most meaningless,
compiled around empty pursuit is
a) 300 BC. a) striving after riches.
b) 500 BC. b) living without God.
c) 700 BC. c) pouring much effort into work.
d) 900 BC. d) trying to advance in one’s position.
2. The proverbs are statements that 7. The book of Ecclesiastes uses the word
a) describe usual results of actions. meaningless how many times?
b) describe guaranteed results of actions. a) Fifteen
c) applied only to the Old Testament culture. b) Twenty-five
d) emphasize the contrast between law and grace. c) Thirty-five
d) Forty-five
3. The theme of the book of Proverbs is that
a) God’s promises never fail. 8. The author of song of songs is
b) most of life is meaningless. a) Samuel.
c) our worship of God takes various forms. b) David.
d) wisdom begins with honoring the Lord. c) Solomon.
d) uncertain.
4. A literary device that represents a concept or
idea as a person is called 9. Jewish tradition has interpreted the Song of
a) a metaphor. Songs to be a book about
b) a simile. a) the beauty of sexual intimacy in marriage.
c) personification. b) perverted and sensual sexuality.
d) parallelism. c) Christ’s love for the church.
d) God’s love for Israel.
5. ecclesiastes is based on a Hebrew word that means
a) “one who is sorrowful.” 10. We should interpret Scripture allegorically
b) “one who calls people together and talks to them.” only when
c) “wise speech or parable.” a) the interpretation appears to conflict with the
d) “meaningless or futile.” rest of Scripture.
b) the interpretation does not conflict with the rest
of Scripture.
c) the Scriptures themselves teach an allegorical
interpretation.
d) a passage is too explicit, as in the case of Song
of Songs.
148 Old Testament Survey
12 What are the various dates suggested for the writing of Song of Songs?
Those who believe Solomon wrote Song of Songs think he wrote it at some point between 960 BC and 931 BC,
the date of his death. Other dates range from before patriarchal times to very late dates.
13 What is the best interpretation of Song of Songs?
It is best to interpret the book in its literal, natural sense. It encourages the celebration of sexual relations
between husband and wife in the bonds of marriage, affirming that this is a gift from God.
14 What does Song of Songs teach us?
The book uses sexual imagery to demonstrate that God’s approach to sexuality is pure, appropriate, and
encouraged in a marital relationship. Everything God created is good, including sexuality within God’s
intended purpose.
Babylonians
Assyrians (850–612 BC)
(612–539 BC)
M all riah I
Shcha m I
Pekah em
az
H ahiah
h
Pe na m
a
ah
as
Ze bo
he
m
e u
hu
ho
ho
ra
ro
os
k
Kings of ISRAEL
Jo
Je
Je
Je
Je
God became angry with Israel because of His people’s participation in sinful
practices and consistent breaking of their covenant with Him. The prophets’
voices fell on deaf ears. God therefore commissioned Syrian kings Hazael and
Ben-Hadad to defeat the nation of Israel. Finally, the Israelites cried out to
God in a desperate plea for assistance. God showered His mercy on them (see
2 Kings 13:4, 22–23; 14:26–27) and sent the Assyrians to defeat the Syrians.
10.1
Jonah: The Fleeing Prophet
Jonah preached to two different nations: Israel and Assyria. In regard to Israel, the
LESSON Bible reveals only that Jonah spoke the word of God during the reign of Jeroboam
II. He predicted military victories that were fulfilled under this king (2 Kings 14:25).
The book of Jonah then describes this prophet’s ministry in the nation of Assyria.
10.1.1
OBJECTIVE
Author and Date
describe the background Due to a lack of internal biblical evidence about the writer of Jonah, many
of Jonah, including conservative scholars believe that the book’s author is uncertain. Others prefer to
authorship and date. stand by Hebrew tradition, which names Jonah himself as the author. At any rate, most
scholars agree that it is best to leave the authorship of this book as an open question.
The date for the writing of Jonah appears to be approximately 760 BC.
The prophet Jonah ministered while Jeroboam II ruled Israel in 793–753 BC
(2 Kings 14:23–25).
Historical Reliability
1 Explain the underlying Because the story of Jonah indicates a rather unusual miracle involving a
question regarding the “great fish” (Jonah 1:17), some people have questioned its historical reliability.
historical accuracy of However, conservative scholars generally agree that the story is historically
Jonah’s story.
accurate. They emphasize that the real issue is whether God performs miracles,
not whether a great fish can swallow a human being:
The key issue is whether Jonah is a work of fiction or of nonfiction. . . . Two
problems complicate the question. The first asks, “Is it possible for a person to
survive three days inside a great fish?” Accounts of sailors who underwent an
ordeal similar to Jonah litter the commentaries. But that misses the point. The
God who parted the Red Sea to save Moses and the Israelites could employ a
fish to save this prophet even if it never happened to anyone else. The real issue
under discussion by interpreters is whether God works miracles or not. That is
not an issue in Jonah (or the rest of the Bible for that matter). That is an issue
raised by the philosophy of the interpreter. (Israel and Fettke 2003, 703–704)
Outline
I. Jonah’s Response to God’s First Call, 1–2
A. Jonah’s call (1:1–2)
B. Jonah’s disobedience (1:3)
C. Results of Jonah’s disobedience (1:4–17)
D. Jonah’s prayer and deliverance (2:1–10)
II. Jonah’s Response to God’s Second Call, 3–4
A. Jonah’s call (3:1–2)
B. Jonah’s obedience (3:3–4)
C. Results of Jonah’s obedience (3:5–10)
D. Jonah’s lesson (4:1–11)
Jonah’s Journey
2 Why did Jonah disobey Although we often criticize Jonah for foolishly trying to run from God’s
God’s call? instructions, believers today are not immune from similar responses to God’s
directives. As for Jonah, he disobeyed God most likely for a variety of reasons.
For one thing, Jonah detested the Assyrians because they worshipped idols,
which was a violation of God’s command, and they were Israel’s enemies. Their
strategy in wartime involved cruelty and injustice. Because of this, Jonah did
not want the citizens of Nineveh to repent; he wanted God to destroy them.
In addition, Jonah feared that if the Assyrians did repent, God would pour out
His mercy on such wicked, cruel, undeserving people (Jonah 4:2). Jonah had
forgotten several key theological truths: (1) God created everyone, (2) God raised
up Israel to be a blessing to other nations (Genesis 12:1–3), and (3) God desired
that everyone come to know Him in a personal relationship.
Yet, in spite of Jonah’s explicit disobedience, God did not discard him. Instead,
God expressed His great love through discipline. A violent storm arose and
bombarded the ship Jonah was on. According to customs and cultures of that day,
particularly of other nations and religions, such weather phenomena meant the gods
were angry and were punishing someone for inappropriate behavior. The sailors
cast lots to determine who had stirred the divine anger. When the lot indicated
Jonah, he confessed and admitted his guilt. At his insistence, the sailors threw
Jonah overboard into the raging waters of the sea, expecting him to drown and die.
But God calmed the sea (Jonah 1:15), and the sailors worshipped the God of Israel.
In the meantime, God sent a large fish to swallow Jonah, rescuing him from
death (1:17). But Jonah was gripped by intense fear. The fish’s stomach was
similar to a dark grave with a horrible smell and taste. The disobedient prophet
Israel’s Early Prophets (Jonah, Amos, Hosea) 155
came to his senses, regretted his disobedience, and repented. From deep in the
dark sea, he prayed earnestly for God’s help (2:1–9). God’s mercy and grace are
lavish, incredible, and pervasive. God forgave Jonah and prompted the great fish
to vomit Jonah out onto dry land (2:10). Jonah had been rescued both from his
sin of disobedience and from the prison of the insides of a fish.
Theological Implications
Does God Change His Mind?
3 What major theological Of the theological issues that arise from the book of Jonah, a major question
issue does the book of Jonah is whether or not God changes His mind. On the basis of Jonah 4:2 and other
raise? scattered Old Testament texts, some individuals assert that God does indeed
relent, or change His mind. Some have further claimed that God reverses His
decisions as a result of our prayers, perhaps contending that prayer is effective
only to the degree that it causes God to relent. However, these beliefs are not
supported by Scripture. Other biblical texts clearly indicate that God does not
change His mind. Numbers 23:19 states, “God is not a man, that he should lie,
nor a son of man, that he should change his mind.” Although a few contend that
the biblical texts are contradictory, when the biblical principle of interpretation
is followed—that unclear texts should be interpreted in light of clear texts rather
than vice versa—the theological tension can be resolved.
Our position is that God does not change His mind. Consider the following
statements by Rich Israel and Steve Fettke:
The story [of Jonah] also raises the issue of God’s changing his decision, or
“relenting” (nacham; Jon. 4:2). Sometimes readers ask how an unchangeable
God, who knows the end from the beginning, can “change his mind.” After all,
Numbers 23:19 claims that such change is a characteristic of humans, not of
God. Yet, Jonah described God as one who “relents from evil.” How may one
hold those two views together theologically?
The sense of the Hebrew verb nacham is “to be sorry.” God was sorry for the
evil that he had decreed against the inhabitants of Nineveh. One should not
infer, though, that God’s mind changed. Jonah knew what God had in mind
from the beginning. He knew that God wanted to spare those wicked sinners,
so he fled to avoid preaching to them. God’s character, however, requires him
to relent from sending calamity any time humans repent from evil (Jon. 4:2).
What he actually “has in mind,” therefore, is to be gracious, compassionate,
slow to anger, abounding in love, and relenting from evil. It was God’s grace
156 Old Testament Survey
that motivated him to send prophets like Jonah to preach to their enemies. God’s
mind does not change. He turns (3:9) from judgment when humans turn (3:10)
from evil. (2003, 706)
Missionary Purpose
A second theological issue involves the book’s missionary theme. God had
a missionary purpose in His call to Jonah; that is, He called Jonah to a specific
missionary task in a specific location. Although Jonah initially resisted the call
and ultimately complained about Nineveh’s positive response, God accomplished
His missionary purpose anyway.
“The story ends with a question that goes unanswered. In posing it, the
narrator puts us all in the hot seat. Do we feel compassion only for our own
comfort? Can we get beyond that to share in God’s compassion for the world,
including our enemies?” (Israel and Fettke 2003, 707). The entire book,
particularly the Lord’s responses in Jonah 4, affirms God’s care, concern, and
mercy for all people. His purpose remains the same today. God desires that all
people and all nations embrace Him as the one true God and Lord of all.
10.2
Amos: The Prophesying Shepherd
LESSON Author and Date
Bible scholars generally agree that Amos authored the book that bears his
name. He was not a priest like Jeremiah or Ezekiel; he was a shepherd and
took care of fig trees (Amos 7:14–15). Since the book of Amos uses an unusual
10.2.1
OBJECTIVE Hebrew word for shepherd, some scholars suggest that Amos was a businessman
describe the calling and who owned flocks and was quite wealthy. However, others question this
theme of amos. conclusion. We do know that Amos’s home was in Tekoa, a small village in Judah
6 miles (9.6 km) south of Bethlehem and 11 miles (18.7 km) from Jerusalem. But
God sent him north to prophesy in the kingdom of Israel.
Amos was not an exegete, scribe, or biblical scholar. He did not attend a
school for prophets, nor was his father a prophet (7:14). While his knowledge of
the times and biblical history shows that he had some education (1:3–2:3), some
contend that this education was not in the formal sense. “God’s willingness to use
people without former academic and religious training highlights the truth that he
shows no partiality—a timely reminder in an age of professionalism like ours”
(Hill and Walton 2000, 479).
4 What does Amos’s Amos’s name, which means “burden-bearer” (Hill and Walton 2000, 479),
name mean, and how did he is theologically significant to his message and calling. For instance, he bore
exemplify this? the burden of social injustice and of identifying with people in their struggles
and difficult times in life. Amos also bore the burdens of the nation of Israel,
particularly in relation to their sin and unfaithfulness to God. That is, he bore
the burden of God’s call to speak prophetically to people who had sinned
consistently and failed to repent of their sinful actions.
By the same token, the fact that he was not part of the religious establishment
of the day enabled him to speak the word of the Lord freely and boldly. “Given
his platform as an ‘independent layman’ and ‘blue-collar’ worker, Amos had
freedom to proclaim God’s message unencumbered by vested interests or public
opinion” (Hill and Walton 2000, 479).
Israel’s Early Prophets (Jonah, Amos, Hosea) 157
According to Amos 1:1, the prophet recorded “what he saw” from God
concerning Israel. Amos received his messages or visions during the reigns
of Uzziah, king of Judah, and Jeroboam II, king of Israel. Thus, Amos likely
ministered around 760–755 BC.
M alluriah I
Ba ab I
Shcha m I
am
Pekah em
az
H kahiah
h
ra h
Pe na m
a
El sha
ah
as
bo
Jo azia
Ze bo
he
m
Ahab
Ti ri
hu
ho
ho
Ah ri
O i
Zi h
ro
ro
bn
ad
a
os
Kings of ISRAEL
m
a
e
Je
Je
Je
Je
Je
N
Prophets of ISRAEL Elijah Elisha Jon. Am. Hosea
1 Sam. 16–
1 Sam. 9–16
2 Sam. 24
1 Kings 1–11 ↕ 1 Kings 12–22 ↕ ↕ 2 Kings 1–17 ↕ ↓ 2 Kings 18–25 ↓
United Kingdom ↓ Divided Kingdom ↓ ↓ Surviving Kingdom ↓
Saul - 40 David - 40 Solomon - 40
1 Chron. 1–29 2 Chron. 1–9 ↓ 2 Chronicles 10–36 ↓
h
Q azi m t
lia
Ah ora pha
ija m
h
ha
h
Ab boa
se
h
h a
ia
ue ah
At
ia
am
Je osh
as
ek
h
az
ia
o
az
en
as
th
an
eh
ez
a
zz
h
Am
Kings of JUDAH
Ah
As
Je
Jo
Jo
M
R
H
Ob. Joel Isaiah
Prophets of JUDAH
Micah
1050 B.C. 1000 B.C. 950 B.C. 900 B.C. 850 B.C. 800 B.C. 750 B.C. 700 B.C. 650 B.C.
722
Prophets of the Divided Kingdom (Gray shading shows wicked kings)
10.2.2 Outline
OBJECTIVE
explain three principles I. Judgments on Eight Nations, 1:1–2:16
from amos 3–6. A. Damascus (Aram or Syria) (1:3–5)
B. Gaza (Philistia) (1:6–8)
C. Tyre (Phoenicia) (1:9–10)
D. Edom (1:11–12)
E. Ammon (1:13–15)
F. Moab (2:1–3)
G. Judah (2:4–5)
H. Israel (2:6–16)
II. Three Principles of Judgment on Israel, 3–6
A. Privilege brings responsibility (3)
B. God’s discipline should lead to repentance (4)
C. God is with those who seek good and against those who seek evil
(5–6)
III. Five Visions of Judgment on Israel, 7:1–9:10
A. Locusts (not sent) (7:1–3)
B. Fire (not sent) (7:4–6)
C. Plumb line (7:7–9)
(Judgment of Amaziah the priest) (7:10–17)
D. Basket of ripe fruit (8:1–14)
E. The Lord by the altar (9:1–10)
IV. Future Restoration of Israel, 9:11–15
Amos set a rhetorical trap to indict his Israelite audience. He first got their
attention by announcing judgment on the breakaway nations of the former
Davidic empire. The climax to his sermon came when he pronounced a more
severe judgment on his Israelite listeners (Amos 2:6–16). For them, that was
probably an unpleasant and unexpected turn of events. In their desire for
judgment on their enemies, they had set themselves up for the same. God’s
accusations against the nations other than Judah and Israel stemmed from
crimes against humanity. Excessive cruelties in warfare were typical reasons
for judgment. Some of those practices included deporting whole populations,
ripping open “pregnant women” (Amos 1:13), and treaty violations. They
were actions that every moral person would condemn as extreme. They were
the reasons for God’s judgment on those nations. Yahweh was the judge of all
nations. He would judge and punish all injustices. (Israel and Fettke 2003, 710)
10.3
Hosea: The Prophet and the Prostitute
LESSON Author, Setting, and Date
The name hosea means “the Lord saves” and is considered to be connected
with the names of Joshua and Isaiah. A contemporary of Amos, Hosea began
his ministry during the last years of the reign of King Jeroboam II, in a time of
10.3.1
OBJECTIVE economic prosperity for Israel. However, when Jeroboam II died in 753 BC, a
describe the purpose of reversal quickly set in. Within fifteen years of Jeroboam’s death, four of Israel’s
hosea. kings were murdered (Zechariah, Shallum, Pekahiah, and Pekah). Within fifteen
more years, Assyria conquered Israel and carried the Jews away as prisoners
(722 BC), later scattering them among the nations. Thus, in the course of Hosea’s
ministry he saw great changes, including the fulfillment of Amos’s prophecies.
The prophet Hosea probably wrote his book from Judah about 715–710 BC.
Purpose
9 What was the purpose of Hosea’s prophecy was God’s last attempt to call the nation of Israel to
Hosea’s prophecy? repentance. Hosea emphasized three things: (1) God’s great love and desire to
redeem His people from their sins, (2) His obligation to judge those who reject
Him, and (3) Israel’s state of spiritual adultery.
Outline
Various outlines of the book of Hosea have been proposed. For the purposes of
this course, the outline provided by Arnold and Beyer is commendable (1999, 440):
I. Hosea’s Family and God’s Family, 1–3
II. God Takes Israel to Court, 4–5
III. Hosea’s Invitation Tarnished by Reality, 6:1–11:11
IV. God’s Final Arguments against Israel, 11:12–13:16
V. The Possibility of Restoration, 14
11 What position does This course takes the position that most likely Gomer was a prostitute prior
this course take regarding to the marriage and continued in her unfaithfulness even after the marriage. That
Gomer’s unfaithfulness? is, we prefer a both/and conclusion from the biblical text rather than an either/or
interpretation. Noted scholars Andrew Hill and John Walton affirm the both/and
view (2000, 468).
In any case, in Hosea’s story, Gomer represented Israel and Hosea represented
God. God often had His prophets illustrate their messages by actually living them
out, such as Jeremiah’s wearing a wooden yoke (Jeremiah 27–28) and Ezekiel’s
erecting a model of the siege of Jerusalem and lying alongside it (Ezekiel 4–5).
In the same way, God used Hosea’s marriage to illustrate His message to Israel
about their unfaithfulness. Gomer committed physical adultery just as Israel
committed spiritual adultery against God (Hosea 2:8–13). The Hebrew text uses
brutal honesty and vivid language to compare the two.
Hosea’s marriage to Gomer also told the Israelites how God felt about choosing
them as His chosen nation. He had married a “prostitute” who was consistently
unfaithful to Him. Thus, Hosea shared a part of God’s heartache, sorrow, and pain.
“Through his failed marriage, Hosea suffered the divine pathos. He felt the pain
of a husband deserted by his unfaithful wife. Like God, he endured his people’s
hostile rejection of his message” (Israel and Fettke 2003, 717).
Even the names of Hosea’s children were prophetic signs to Israel
(Hosea 1:4–9). Hosea 1:3 indicates that Hosea fathered their first child, a son
named Jezreel. However, the absence of the word him in Hosea 1:6 and 1:9 may
mean that the other two children were born from Gomer’s adulterous relationships
(1:2). The names of the second and third children symbolized God’s deep
disappointment in Israel: Lo-Ruhamah meant “not loved,” and Lo-Ammi meant
“not my people.”
12 Compare Hosea’s Yet the overriding lesson in Hosea involved Gomer’s continued adultery
marriage with his message. during their marriage. Despite her unfaithfulness, God did not tell Hosea to stone
her as the law of Moses commanded. Rather, God clearly instructed the prophet
to love her. According to Hosea 3:1–5, Gomer had become the property of
another, so Hosea redeemed her, or bought her back.
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
10
CHAPTER
1. The greatest debate about Jonah’s historical 6. Based on Amos 3–6, it appears that Israel’s sin
accuracy centers on which question? problem was rooted in their
a) Would God send a prophet to a wicked a) intermarriage with people from other nations.
Gentile nation? b) inability to discern God’s message through Amos.
b) Can God perform the miracle of keeping Jonah c) pride in their privileged position as God’s
alive in a fish’s belly for three days? chosen people.
c) Can God use a prophet who resents the mission d) rejection of God’s discipline.
God has given him?
7. Hosea’s name means
d) Does God really care about the heathen nations
a) “light-bearer.”
of the world?
b) “burden-bearer.”
2. Jonah did not want to go to Nineveh primarily c) “Jehovah is my righteousness.”
because d) “the Lord saves.”
a) the journey was too far.
8. The period of Hosea’s ministry overlapped that of
b) the people were wicked and enemies of Israel.
a) Amos.
c) he would be rejected by his own people.
b) Joel.
d) he was too old to make the journey.
c) Micah.
3. The people of Nineveh responded to Jonah’s d) Obadiah.
message by
9. The name of Gomer’s third child, Lo-Ammi, meant
a) repenting and turning from their wicked ways.
a) “not my people.”
b) laughing at Jonah with rejection.
b) “Israel is forsaken.”
c) forcing Jonah to flee for his life.
c) “not love.”
d) listening yet resisting the urge to repent.
d) “unfaithful.”
4. Amos’s name means
10. God uses courtroom imagery to bring charges of
a) “Jehovah is my righteousness.”
unfaithfulness against Israel in the book of
b) “the Lord saves.”
a) Jonah.
c) “burden-bearer.”
b) Obadiah.
d) “light-bearer.”
c) Amos.
5. According to Amos 5:24, the theme of Amos d) Hosea.
centers on
a) the tension between God’s love and His judgment.
b) God’s desire for redemption.
c) judgment for Israel’s idolatry.
d) social justice and righteousness.
164 Old Testament Survey
Chapter 10 Chapter 11
While the rulers of the Northern Kingdom led Israel further and further into
idolatry, the Southern Kingdom’s decline under her leaders was more gradual.
Kings such as Jehoshaphat and Josiah led the nation of Judah in worshipping the
one true God. Yet other kings turned away from monotheism and worshipped
idols. As the rule of Judah passed from one king to another, God continued to
speak through prophets such as Joel, Isaiah, and Micah, calling His people to
repent and turn to Him wholeheartedly or face judgment.
11.1
Joel: The Prophet of Pentecost
LESSON Author and Date
The name Joel, meaning “the Lord is God,” was common in Old Testament
times. At least twelve other men in the Old Testament were named Joel.
However, Joel 1:1 clearly states that the prophet Joel, son of Pethuel, authored
11.1.1
OBJECTIVE the book that bears his name. Frequent references to Zion or Jerusalem, Judah,
summarize what Joel says and priests or the temple (Joel 2:32; 3:1, 6, 8, 16–20) appear to support the idea
about locusts, repentance, that Joel lived in Judah.
Pentecost, and the day of The date of the book of Joel is difficult to know because he does not
the Lord. refer to any king or historical event. Some scholars propose a date as late as
312 BC, claiming the book was written after the Jews returned from exile in
Babylon and rebuilt the temple. They point to Joel’s frequent references to the
priests instead of a king as support for their argument. Other scholars propose
a date as early as 835 BC, around the time of King Joash of Judah, well before
the Exile. Most conservative scholars favor this latter, preexilic date, around
the eighth century BC.
Outline
I. Judah’s Present Judgment, 1:1–20
A. A great plague of locusts (1:2–12)
B. A call to national repentance (1:13–14)
C. Judah’s desperate situation (1:15–20)
II. An Even Greater Judgment at Hand, 2:1–17
A. An army prepared to march against Judah (2:1–11)
B. A call to national repentance (2:12–17)
III. The Future Day of the Lord, 2:18–3:21
A. Prophecy of restoration (2:18–27)
B. Prophecy of Pentecost (2:28–32)
C. Prophecy of judgment (3:1–15)
D. Prophecy of salvation (3:16–21)
168 Old Testament Survey
11.2
Isaiah: The Prophet of the Messiah
LESSON Author and Date
Differing opinions exist concerning the authorship of the book of Isaiah.
Many maintain that Isaiah wrote the entire book. However, others believe that
Isaiah wrote chapters 1–39 and another person authored chapters 40–66. Still
11.2.1
OBJECTIVE others contend that a third person wrote chapters 55–66.
describe the author, The discussion of authorship centers on the fact that Isaiah 40–66 refers
setting, purpose, and call to a historical era after the eighth century BC. Thus, the question is, Does the
of isaiah. book look at this time period from a future or present perspective? In other
words, were these events prophesied ahead of time or within the author’s own
generation? Those with a multiple-author perspective argue that the historical
events could be known only to someone living at that particular time. They
support their position by indicating differences in writing style as well as in
theological emphases or themes between sections of the book.
4 Who does this course However, all of these arguments assume that such variances could not occur by
advocate as the author of the same author. Dyer and Merrill correctly point out that “all these objections . . .
Isaiah, and why? are based on the presupposition that predictive prophecy is not possible” (2001,
524). Did not the omniscient God often use His prophets to foretell specific future
events even hundreds of years in advance? Conservative scholarship contends that
a view of “divided authorship undermines both the supernatural character and the
authority of Scripture” (Israel and Fettke 2003, 749). In addition, Jesus and the
apostles seem to promote the prophet Isaiah as the author of the entire book. “If
170 Old Testament Survey
. . . scripture interprets scripture, then surely the noncritical acceptance of Isaiah’s
writings from all its sections by Jesus and the apostles should be given great
weight and lasting authority” (Israel and Fettke 2003, 749). In other words, internal
biblical evidence appears to support the one-author viewpoint.
Therefore, like most conservative evangelical scholars, this course holds
to the view that the entire book—chapters 1–66—was authored by the prophet
Isaiah, son of Amoz (Isaiah 1:1). Isaiah likely wrote his book around 700 BC.
Isaiah’s Call
5 Read Isaiah 6:1–8, and Isaiah 6 records Isaiah’s unique call and commission to serve as God’s
describe Isaiah’s call. prophet. In a vision, Isaiah “saw the Lord seated on a throne,” surrounded
by flying seraphs who continually worshipped Him (6:1–3). When Isaiah
despaired of his uncleanness, one of the seraphs cleansed Isaiah’s lips with
a coal. To the Lord’s question, “Whom shall I send?” Isaiah obediently
answered, “Here am I. Send me!” (6:8).
Isaiah then prophesied “during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and
Hezekiah” (1:1), meaning that his ministry spanned “decades, from 740 until
701 BC or later” (Israel and Fettke 2003, 733). “Isaiah served as a prophet in
Judah’s royal court. He thus prophesied mainly to Judah, though he also had
words for Israel and other nations” (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 355). Some have
suggested that Isaiah’s service in the royal court may have given him access to
certain information included in his book.
Outline
I. Prophecies of Judgment, 1–35
A. Setting of the book (1)
B. Early prophecies of Isaiah (2–5)
C. Call of Isaiah (6)
D. Early prophecies of the Messiah (7–12)
E. Judgment on the nations (13–23)
F. The coming kingdom of God (24–27)
G. Woe and hope (28–35)
II. Hezekiah’s Deliverance, Healing, and Pride, 36–39
III. Prophecies of Salvation and Hope, 40–66
A. Israel’s restoration (40–48)
B. The suffering Messiah (49–53)
C. Israel’s redemption (54–59)
D. Israel’s glorious future (60–66)
Specifically, Isaiah 40–55 portrays the Messiah as the Servant of the Lord.
Scholars note that four “servant songs” appear in this portion of Scripture:
(a) 42:1–4; (b) 49:1–6; (c) 50:4–9; and (d) 52:13–53:12. The fourth servant
song on “the Suffering Servant” (52:13–53:12) is further outlined as follows:
the servant’s triumph (52:13–15), the servant’s rejection (53:1–3), the servant’s
suffering (53:4–6), the servant’s death (53:7–9), and the servant’s reward
(53:10–12) (Israel and Fettke 2003, 743).
While the chapter variations may differ, conservative scholars agree that the
remainder of Isaiah deals with God’s promised restoration of Israel. As with other
of the prophetical books, God ends His message of judgment by offering hope
and deliverance.
Judah’s Early Prophets (Joel, Isaiah, Micah) 173
11.3
Micah: The Prophet of Judgment and Mercy
LESSON Author and Date
Scholars generally agree that “Micah of Moresheth” (Micah 1:1) authored
the book that bears his name. Strong evidence of this is found in Jeremiah 26:18,
where some elders remind the people of Micah’s ministry and quote from
11.3.1
OBJECTIVE Micah 3:12. The Jeremiah reference says that Micah “prophesied in the days
identify the kings of of Hezekiah king of Judah,” and Micah himself specifically mentions the kings
micah’s time, and explain Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah (Micah 1:1). Thus, Micah ministered sometime
why micah prophesied between 750 and 686 BC and was a contemporary of Isaiah, who prophesied in
both judgment and mercy. Jerusalem, and Hosea, who prophesied in Israel.
Micah was from Moresheth Gath, a small town in Judah about 25 miles
9 During the reigns of what (40 km) southwest of Jerusalem. It was near the old Philistine stronghold of Gath.
three kings did Micah minister? Like Amos, then, Micah was a country prophet.
Outline
Arnold and Beyer see Micah 1–5 as the “first round of judgment and
salvation” and 6–7 as the “second round of judgment and salvation” (1999, 455).
For the purposes of our study, however, we will use the following outline:
I. Judgment against Israel and Judah, 1–3
A. Introduction (1:1–2)
B. Prophecy: God will destroy Samaria (1:3–7)
C. Prophecy: God will destroy Judah (1:8–16)
D. Sins among God’s people (2:1–11)
E. Hope amidst despair (2:12–13)
F. Sins among God’s leaders (3)
II. Prophetic Message of Hope, 4–5
A. The coming Kingdom (4)
B. The coming King from Bethlehem (5:1–5)
C. The coming victory and cleansing (5:5–15)
III. God’s Case against Israel, 6
A. God accuses His people (6:1–8)
B. The coming judgment (6:9–16)
IV. Future Hope for God’s People, 7
174 Old Testament Survey
(4:9–13). Jesus Christ fulfilled God’s word through Micah (Mt 2:4–6;
Lk 2:1–7). Jesus accomplished spiritual salvation during his first coming, and
one day, he will return to reign over all as King of kings. . . . Unfortunately,
as God looked at Micah’s generation, he saw few such lives. Instead, he saw
crooked business practices, violence, and deceit (6:11–12). The people followed
the ways of Omri and Ahab, two evil kings from Israel’s past (6:16). God
warned His people: He would not allow these sins to continue! (1999, 455)
A well-known key verse from Micah summarizes his message: “He has
showed you, O man, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To
act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (6:8). That is,
believers should exhibit humility and treat others—believers and unbelievers
alike—with social justice. God’s children should also love mercy, to the extent
of acknowledging that if not for the grace of God, they would be under the
judgment of God as well.
176 Old Testament Survey
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
11
CHAPTER
1. Joel means 6. Isaiah uses which word more than all the other
a) “burden-bearer.” Old Testament prophets combined?
b) “the Lord is God.” a) Judgment
c) “the Lord is holy.” b) Servant
d) “Jehovah saves.” c) Salvation
d) Restoration
2. A prominent theme in the book of Joel is
a) the Day of the Lord. 7. Isaiah 7:14; 9:6–7 prophesy about the Messiah’s
b) the coming Messiah. a) incarnation.
c) God’s faithfulness. b) message.
d) God’s holiness. c) mission.
d) second coming.
3. What kind of restoration does the prophet Joel
refer to? 8. The “song” about the Suffering Servant is found
a) Physical in Isaiah
b) Spiritual a) 42:1–4.
c) Emotional b) 49:1–6.
d) Physical and spiritual c) 52:13–53:12.
d) 61:1–3.
4. A major argument against multiple authorship of
the book of Isaiah involves 9. Micah prophesied during the reigns of
a) Jewish tradition. a) Uzziah, Ahaz, and Hezekiah.
b) Jesus’ and the apostles’ indication of one author. b) Uzziah, Jotham, and Ahaz.
c) the book’s continuity of flow and theme. c) Uzziah, Jotham, and Hezekiah.
d) its unified tone and writing style. d) Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah.
5. Isaiah prophesied during the reigns of 10. In Micah 6:8, the prophet summarizes his
a) Pekah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah. message about
b) Ahab, Pekah, Uzziah, and Hezekiah. a) law versus grace.
c) Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah. b) mercy and judgment or justice.
d) Uzziah, Pekah, Ahaz, and Jeroboam. c) complete restoration for Israel.
d) responsibilities that come with privileges.
Judah’s Early Prophets (Joel, Isaiah, Micah) 177
12.1
Nahum: The Prophet of Nineveh’s Fall
LESSON Author and Date
It is generally agreed that the prophet Nahum wrote his book, although little is
known about him. Nahum 1:1 indicates that he was from Elkosh, but its location
is undetermined. Nahum was most likely from Judah, since Israel had been
12.1.1
OBJECTIVE conquered when he wrote.
summarize what nahum The date of authorship appears to be around 630–620 BC. “We can date
says about the reasons for Nahum’s prophecy because of his allusions to datable events. Nahum mentions
God’s judgment of nineveh. the fall of Thebes (3:8), an event that occurred in 663 BC. The prophet also
speaks of Nineveh’s fall, which took place in 612, as something yet future.
Consequently, we may date Nahum’s prophetic ministry between 663 BC and
612 BC” (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 456). Thus, Nahum ministered during the
revival that occurred in King Josiah’s reign.
Background
Nahum prophesied against Nineveh, the capital city of the Assyrian Kingdom.
Nineveh “boasted a large wall eight miles in circumference. It utilized a water
system employing an aqueduct. Archaeologists have unearthed a royal library
containing twenty thousand clay tablets” (Brubaker 2003b, 764). Yet the
Assyrians had a reputation for cruelty and oppression to people they conquered.
“The Assyrians’ ruthless political policies led other nations to fear them” (Arnold
and Beyer 1999, 457). After capturing a city, they slaughtered hundreds of
people and scattered the others to faraway cities. Many of these captives died
on the journey because of harsh treatment (Nahum 3:3). The Assyrians tortured
the leaders of conquered nations and then murdered them. As Nahum 3:19 asks,
“Who has not felt your endless cruelty?”
More than one hundred years earlier, Jonah had prophesied against
Nineveh, and the people of Nineveh had repented. Yet sometime later, the
people returned to their oppressive ways. God used these cruel Assyrians to
punish Israel. They conquered the Northern Kingdom in 722 BC and destroyed
Samaria, the capital of Israel.
In the eighth century BC, the prophet Jonah went to the city of Nineveh
to proclaim a judgment oracle against her. The Ninevites responded with
repentance, and God spared them. More than a century later, Nahum also
declared the judgment of God upon the wicked city of Nineveh. This time
there was no fasting or sackcloth, and Nineveh was not spared. (Hill and
Walton 2000, 509)
Outline
I. The Judge of Nineveh, 1
A. God’s wrath and goodness (1:1–7)
B. Nineveh’s judgment (1:8–11, 14)
C. Judah’s comfort (1:12–13, 15)
182 Old Testament Survey
12.2
Habakkuk: The Prophet of Faith
LESSON Author and Date
Habakkuk 1:1 and 3:1 indicate that the author of this book was likely
“Habakkuk the prophet.” As with Nahum, information about the person of
Habbakuk is not abundant.
12.2.1
OBJECTIVE Concerning date of authorship, although Habakkuk does not refer to a
summarize habakkuk’s king, “most scholars place the beginning of his ministry before 605 BC, when
two questions and God’s Babylon, under Nebuchadnezzar, became a dominant world power (1:5).
answers. Habakkuk’s words against Babylon (2:5–20) imply that Babylon had already
become a strong nation. Probably Habakkuk’s ministry began before 605 but
continued until shortly before Jerusalem’s fall in 587” (Arnold and Beyer 1999,
458). As a result, a significant number of scholars think Habakkuk wrote his book
sometime between 625 and 605 BC.
The Preexilic Prophets (Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Obadiah, Jeremiah) 183
Outline
I. Habakkuk’s Questions and God’s Answers, 1–2
A. Question 1: How can God allow wicked Judah not to be punished?
(1:2–4)
B. Answer 1: God will use the Babylonians to punish Judah (1:5–11)
C. Question 2: How can God use a more wicked nation to punish
Judah? (1:12–2:1)
D. Answer 2: God will judge Babylon later (2:2–20)
II. Habakkuk’s Prayer and Song of Faith, 3
A. Prayer: In wrath, remember mercy (3:1–2)
B. The power of the Lord (3:3–7)
C. The saving acts of the Lord (3:8–15)
D. Habakkuk’s steadfast faith in God (3:16–19)
remember to interpret Habakkuk in the context of its original audience, the New
Testament references affirm that our righteousness comes through faith in Jesus
Christ. The truth of Habakkuk 2:4, along with other New Testament texts, played
a key role in the Protestant Reformation, for it led Martin Luther to embrace the
biblical doctrine of grace, or justification by faith alone (Boice 1996, 90).
12.3
Zephaniah: The Prophet of the Day of the Lord
LESSON Author, Date, and Setting
The prophet Zephaniah, whose name means “the Lord hides,” wrote
the book that bears his name. Zephaniah states that he was a great-great-
12.3.1
OBJECTIVE
grandson of Hezekiah (1:1). While some scholars disagree, quite a few
conservative scholars believe this refers to King Hezekiah of Judah. Some
explain what Zephaniah note that Zephaniah “was possibly a member of the royal household” (Hill and
teaches about the day of Walton 2000, 521) and that “his unusual genealogy mentions four ancestors”
the Lord. (Brubaker 2003b, 766). According to Zephaniah 1:1, he prophesied during
7 What was Zephaniah’s
the reign of one of his relatives, King Josiah (640–609 BC), who was the last
personal background? godly king of Judah.
Zephaniah probably wrote his book around 630 BC, in the same general
time period in which Jeremiah, Habakkuk, and Nahum ministered. The corrupt
influence of kings Manasseh and Amon, who ruled prior to Josiah, continued for
The Preexilic Prophets (Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Obadiah, Jeremiah) 185
many years. Whereas Zephaniah denounced Judah’s sins (1:4–13; 3:1–7), Nahum
did not mention them at all, indicating that Nahum prophesied after King Josiah
led the nation to repent. Because of this, many scholars believe that Zephaniah
ministered a few years before Nahum. “In the eighteenth year of Josiah’s reign,
the Book of the Law was discovered in the temple, and this discovery ignited
a period of sweeping spiritual revival in Judah (2 Kings 22:3–23:7). In light of
this, many propose that Zephaniah prophesied early in Josiah’s reign before the
revival occurred” (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 459).
Outline
I. The Day of the Lord Will Bring Judgment to Some, 1:1–3:8
A. God will judge the whole earth (1:2–3)
B. God will judge Judah (1:4–13)
C. The great Day of the Lord will come (1:14–18)
D. God calls all to repent (2:1–3)
E. God will judge the nations (2:4–15)
F. God will judge Jerusalem (3:1–7)
G. God will judge the whole earth (3:8)
II. The Day of the Lord Will Bring Salvation to Some, 3:9–20
A. A remnant will be restored and purified (3:9–13)
B. The people will rejoice with God in their midst (3:14–17)
C. God promises to restore His people (3:18–20)
out their hearts’ desires in these areas and apparently had little or no interest in
worshipping the one true God who had delivered them in the past.
12.4
Obadiah: The Prophet against Edom
LESSON Author, Date, and Setting
A prophet named Obadiah wrote the book of the same name (Obadiah 1:1).
However, Obadiah was a common name; scholars indicate that at least twelve
people in the Old Testament were called Obadiah. The biblical text provides few
12.4.1
OBJECTIVE clues as to which of these persons wrote this book. Therefore, the exact author
explain the background of remains uncertain.
the book of obadiah and the Because the book is so short—only one chapter—the internal evidence for the
reason for coming judgment. date of the book and the historical setting is minimal at best. Although as many
as five dates have been proposed for its authorship, the majority of scholars focus
on two possible dates: 848–841 BC or 587–586 BC. Those who propose the
earlier date of Obadiah’s writing discount the 587–586 BC date because all other
prophets who refer to Jerusalem’s final destruction call Nebuchadnezzar by name
or mention Babylon. Such scholars claim that since Obadiah does not mention
these specifics, he must have written his book in regard to a different attack on
Jerusalem. They believe Obadiah referred to the Philistines’ and Arabs’ invasion
of Jerusalem during King Jehoram’s rule (2 Chronicles 21:16–17).
However, this is a rather weak perspective because it is an argument from
silence (based on something the biblical text does not say)—a risky way to
interpret Scripture. As a result, the majority of conservative scholarship holds to a
date of 587–586 BC that coincides with the destruction of Jerusalem. Despite the
brevity of Obadiah, its internal evidence seems to support this date:
The majority view . . . considers the book to be a response to the 587–586 BC.
attack by Babylon and its allies such as Edom. If the majority view is correct,
Obadiah’s prophecy was a divine word of retribution for Edom. This nation
took particular delight in Judah’s humiliation. Following the fall of Jerusalem, it
made raids on the Judean people. (Brubaker 2003b, 781)
The Preexilic Prophets (Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Obadiah, Jeremiah) 187
Outline
I. Judgment on Edom, 1–14
A. God’s promise to completely destroy Edom (1–9)
B. The reason for Edom’s destruction (10–14)
II. The Day of the Lord, 15–21
A. Judgment on Edom and other nations (15–16)
B. Salvation for Israel (17–21)
12.5
Jeremiah and His Lamentations:
The Prophet of Weeping
LESSON
Authorship and Date
The prophet Jeremiah wrote his book (1:1) because of a divine mandate. In
12.5.1 Jeremiah 36:1–4, God told the prophet to write on a scroll all the words God
OBJECTIVE had spoken to him concerning the nations in his twenty years of prophesying.
summarize Jeremiah’s Scholars believe this occurred sometime around 605 BC. Jeremiah obeyed
call, ministry, and God’s command by dictating the words to Baruch. Although King Jehoiakim
message before and after burned the first scroll, God instructed Jeremiah and Baruch to make a second one
Jerusalem fell. (36:27–32). Baruch faithfully served as an administrative assistant and likely put
Jeremiah’s book in its final form shortly after Jeremiah died (585–580 BC).
Jeremiah’s Ministry
The son of a priest, Jeremiah was born and reared in the village of Anathoth,
4 miles (6.5 km) northeast of Jerusalem. “More is known about this ancient
preacher than any other prophet of God: his birthplace, call, time references,
friends, enemies. Specific settings for some messages are clearly understood”
(Brubaker 2003b, 769).
When God called him to prophesy (1:4–5), Jeremiah tried to claim that he
was too young and did not know how to speak for God. But the Lord touched
Jeremiah’s mouth and assured Jeremiah of His presence, saying, “I have put
my words in your mouth” (1:9). Jeremiah then prophesied to Judah during the
last forty years of the nation’s existence (626–586 BC). That is, he was the last
prophet to the nation of Judah before the kingdom fell. Jeremiah personally
witnessed three different Babylonian invasions of Judah and Jerusalem. He saw
soldiers tear down the city walls and destroy the temple, kill numerous Jews, and
carry many others to Babylon.
13 What did God specifically Throughout his book, Jeremiah showed unusual vulnerability in detailing his
instruct Jeremiah not to do? life and ministry. He revealed his struggles with God’s call, with the formidable
opposition to his ministry, and with the unique commands God gave him. For
instance, God directed Jeremiah not to attend weddings or funerals (16:5–9).
Immediately before these instructions, God had commanded Jeremiah himself not
to marry or have children (16:1–4). The context of this passage seems to suggest
that God called Jeremiah to celibacy because of the coming judgment of Judah and
the uncertainty of the historical and political times (Brubaker 2003b, 770).
14 What was Jeremiah often Jeremiah’s life was lonely and full of sorrow. He was often called the Weeping
called, and why? Prophet because of his many tears and his tender heart (9:1). Still, the Lord’s
promise to be with him and strengthen him (1:8; 15:20) enabled Jeremiah to be
bold and brave and to carry out his call and commission from the Lord (1:4–10).
However, Jeremiah’s faithful warnings of impending judgment alienated
him from the people he loved and caused them to become antagonistic. He was
beaten (20:1–2; 37:15), lowered into a well where he sank into the mud (38:1–6),
and jailed twice (20:2; 37:15–16). After Jerusalem fell, Jewish insurgents forced
Jeremiah to flee with them to Egypt against God’s clear mandate not to go there
(42–43:7). In Egypt, Jeremiah continued to prophesy, and Jewish tradition
contends that he was stoned to death.
The Preexilic Prophets (Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Obadiah, Jeremiah) 189
Outline of Jeremiah
Scholars have outlined the book of Jeremiah in various ways. One such
outline is given below. Note that the organization of chapters in the book of
Jeremiah is not chronological.
I. Jeremiah’s Call and Commission, 1
II. Jeremiah’s Prophecies to Judah, 2–33
A. Prophecies about judgment (2–29)
B. Prophecies about restoration (30–33)
III. Jeremiah’s Role as Watchman, 34–45
A. Prophecy to Zedekiah about captivity (34)
B. The lesson of the Recabites (35)
C. Burning of Jeremiah’s scroll and his imprisonment (36–38)
D. Fulfillment of prophecies concerning Jerusalem’s fall (39)
E. Jeremiah’s ministry after the fall of Jerusalem (40–45)
IV. Jeremiah’s Prophecies to the Nations, 46–51
V. Historical Appendix on Jerusalem’s Fall, 52
Chapters Topic
11–20 Jeremiah’s confessions; that is, his dialogues with God
Implications
A key theological question that the book of Jeremiah raises is this: Does
God’s consistent judgment of the nations in the Old Testament specifically apply
to individual believers today? Noted scholars Andrew Hill and John Walton
provide helpful comments on this particular issue:
This system is operative for nations, not individuals, so it should not be
confused with salvation by works. This scale of deeds is never conveyed as the
way that God deals with individuals, and the differences must be noted. Nations
are not “saved” from sin, nor do they exist eternally. Nations are therefore
treated solely on physical and temporal terms, so the system can in no way be
equated to the eternal destiny of individuals. Grace does exist in the system as
evidenced by the longsuffering character of God, and it continues to manifest
his grace, because there is nothing in Scripture to suggest that God has changed
his policy for dealing with nations. (2000, 430–431)
Like other prophets, Jeremiah affirmed God’s judgment as well as His mercy
and grace. Entreating the people to repent, Jeremiah often wept because of his
love for God and for the people God sent him to. Prophesying harsh words of
judgment was not something Jeremiah would have chosen for himself, but God
chose him. Jeremiah obeyed God’s call and spoke what God told him to convey,
both negative and positive.
Series of Acrostics
The laments in Lamentations 1–4 are acrostic poems. An acrostic poem
in Hebrew uses sequential letters of the 22-letter Hebrew alphabet in some
fashion, most often to begin each verse or stanza. For example, Lamentations 1:1
begins with aleph, the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, and Lamentations 1:2
begins with beth, the second letter. The author continues to use each letter of
the alphabet to begin a verse so that 1:22 begins with taw, the last letter of the
Hebrew alphabet. Lamentations 2 and 4 follow the same type of pattern. In the
sixty-six verses of Lamentations 3, the first three verses begin with aleph, the
next three verses begin with beth, and so on.
Outline of Lamentations
The organization of the book of Lamentations coincides with each chapter. That
is, although chapter divisions were not added until centuries after the Scriptures
were written, each chapter of this book comprises an individual lament:
I. Jerusalem’s Destruction, 1
II. God’s Anger and Jerusalem’s Sorrow, 2
III. God’s Suffering People and Their Hope, 3
IV. Jerusalem’s Past, Present, and Future, 4
V. Prayer for Restoration, 5
an outrageous price in the wake of disaster. Yet, in spite of all the torment and
destruction, Lamentations 3 affirms the faithfulness of God.
There is a pop theology circulating today that says if believers have faith they
will not suffer. However, Lamentations suggests life’s most intense cruelties can
prove our faith. Out of the black abyss of chaos, out of the fires of torment, out
of the depths of agony, rises that majestic hymn of the church, its words taken
from Lamentations 3:22–23: “Great is thy faithfulness, O God my Father. There
is no shadow of turning with thee. Thou changest not, Thy compassions they
fail not. As Thou hast been, Thou forever wilt be.” (Brubaker 2003b, 776–777)
God’s faithfulness will prevail even in times of uncertainty, tragedy, distress,
and persecution.
The Preexilic Prophets (Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Obadiah, Jeremiah) 193
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
12
CHAPTER
Ezekiel is called to be a
(2 Kings 24:14).
Medes.
13.1
Ezekiel: The Prophet of Dramatic Acting
LESSON Author and Date
Although some liberal scholars disagree, conservative scholars believe that
the prophet Ezekiel himself recorded his prophecies in the book of Ezekiel. They
focus on internal biblical evidence such as the book’s frequent use of the first
13.1.1
OBJECTIVE person, the many specific dates given for Ezekiel’s prophecies and visions, and
recount the setting, the various literary devices used. Due to these factors, conservative scholars
purposes, and themes of agree that Ezekiel probably completed writing his book by 570 BC, shortly after
ezekiel his last recorded prophecy.
Ezekiel, whose name means “God strengthens,” was both a prophet and
a priest (1:3). Ezekiel lived in Jerusalem until he was twenty-five, when he
was taken as a captive to Babylon, away from the temple in Jerusalem where
the Israelite priests usually began their ministry. Because of his priestly role,
Ezekiel’s prophecy emphasized the temple and appropriate worship patterns and
attitudes (8–11; 40–48). As prophet, Ezekiel was often called to deliver messages
about the people’s failure to abide by their covenant with God.
While in Babylon, Ezekiel and his wife lived in their own house among
the Jewish exiles by the Kebar River (1:1; 3:15, 24; 8:1). He prophesied for at
least twenty-two years, from 593–571 BC (29:17). God specifically directed
Ezekiel to be personally involved in his messages and with the people by
acting out his prophecies.
1 Identify several unique Throughout his ministry, God referred to the prophet as “son of man” (ninety
aspects of the book of Ezekiel. times) and showed him many visions of future judgment and other events. More
than any other Old Testament prophet, Ezekiel carefully documented the dates on
which he saw several of his visions. In some of these, the Spirit of the Lord came
into Ezekiel and lifted him, at times carrying him to a different place (2:2; 3:12,
14, 24; 8:3; 11:1, 24; 37:1; 43:5).
Outline
I. Ezekiel’s Call to Prophesy, 1–3
A. Ezekiel’s vision of God (1)
B. Ezekiel’s call and commission (2–3)
198 Old Testament Survey
Ezekiel’s original audience as well? “As drama, Ezekiel’s words and actions gave
‘shock treatment’ to a nation made callous by sin against the Lord. His bold and
provocative language (especially the image of harlotry in chapters 16 and 23)
was designed to scandalize and convict a people desensitized to the truth by a life
of spiritual adultery” (Hill and Walton 2000, 446).
5 Do you believe Ezekiel One theological issue in the book of Ezekiel concerns chapter 28. As with
28 refers to Satan? Support any biblical passage, we must first interpret this chapter in light of its original
your answer from research. historical and cultural context and how the audience of that day understood
its meaning. With that in mind, scholars agree that Ezekiel 28 primarily refers
to the king of Tyre. However, some believe in a possible secondary meaning.
They suggest that Ezekiel 28 also refers to Satan and his expulsion from heaven.
Arnold and Beyer state:
Like Isaiah 14, Ezekiel 28 is another passage many evangelicals believe describes
Satan because the language goes so far beyond what we would normally expect
of a human ruler. Yet verse 12 specifically refers to the king of Tyre as the
object of Ezekiel’s words. Also, the New Testament does not cite these verses as
referring to Satan. Probably Ezekiel’s lofty language symbolically described the
great material blessing God had given Tyre’s ruler. (1999, 419)
6 What do the terms Gog Next, Ezekiel prophesies against Gog and Magog (38–39). Throughout history,
and Magog represent to you? scholars have debated over the meaning of these two terms and what they represent.
According to Arnold and Beyer, “the terms appear to describe the ultimate foe of
God’s people. Revelation 20:8 also mentions them in an equally difficult context.
We can say that whoever they are, God’s power will overcome them. As they gather
against God’s people, the Lord will bring final victory” (1999, 421).
The New Temple (Ezekiel 40–48)
7 In your opinion, what is the Ezekiel’s prophecy includes two visions of the temple: (1) as God’s glory
best interpretation concerning leaves prior to the temple’s destruction (8–11) and (2) as God’s glory returns
Israel’s new temple? after the temple’s restoration (40–48). The question of how to interpret the nine
chapters describing the new temple (40–48) has led to many differing views:
200 Old Testament Survey
13.2
Daniel: The Prophet of Divine Sovereignty
LESSON Author and Date
More-liberal scholars question Daniel’s authorship of his book because of
perceived historical inaccuracies and their assumptions that predictive prophecy
is not possible. They contend that the apocalyptic nature of the book of Daniel
13.2.1
OBJECTIVE implies fanciful and fictitious speculations.
explain the setting, author, However, conservative scholars affirm that Daniel himself wrote the book, a
date, and themes of daniel. view supported by internal biblical evidence naming him as the author (Daniel 9:2;
10:2; 12:4–5). This evidence extends to the New Testament in Matthew 24:15,
where Jesus called Daniel by name and quoted from Daniel 9:27; 11:31; and 12:11.
Conservative scholars also point out that, while a few historical mysteries remain,
many of the so-called inaccuracies in the book of Daniel have been resolved by
archaeological finds and other recent discoveries about that historical era.
The book of Daniel spans from Nebuchadnezzar’s first invasion of Jerusalem
(605 BC) to the third year of Cyrus in 536 BC (Daniel 10:1). Thus, most
conservative scholars hold to a date of authorship sometime in the sixth century BC.
Setting
Daniel, whose name means “God is my judge,” was one of the last Old
Testament prophets. Remember that Daniel was likely only a teenager when
he was captured and taken to Babylon in 605 BC. He apparently lived through
the end of the seventy years of captivity of which Jeremiah prophesied
(Jeremiah 25:11–12; 29:10–14; Daniel 9:1–3).
Daniel was exiled by the Babylonians in 605 BC for governmental service.
He, along with other young men from various conquered lands, was taken to
the great city of Babylon. There they received an education in the Babylonian
language and literature. Daniel’s divinely anointed and natural abilities propelled
him into a position as a counselor to King Nebuchadnezzar. Daniel faithfully
and competently served his foreign masters for many decades. In 539 BC the
Persians, under Cyrus the Great, took control of Babylon. Thus Daniel’s last
years were lived as an official in the Persian government. (Brubaker 2003b, 792)
The Exilic Prophets (Ezekiel, Daniel) 201
Apocalyptic Literature
8 Describe the literary Like Revelation in the New Testament, the book of Daniel is classified
genre in which Daniel falls. as apocalyptic literature. The term apocalyptic stems from the Greek word
apokalupto, meaning “to unveil or reveal.” A common literary genre in the
ancient Near East, apocalyptic literature used visions and symbols to unveil
or reveal hidden things, which often included future events. In other words,
apocalyptic books incorporated several common characteristics, including
visions, a concern about the future, descriptions of an eschatological judgment,
and a division of history into distinct chronological periods culminating in the
final judgment (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 428).
13.2.2 Outline
OBJECTIVE
describe the dreams or The stories in Daniel 1–6 “are accounts of Daniel and his friends. They detail
visions in daniel 2, 7, 8, 9, their education and work as administrators and wise men. These narratives
and 10–12. resemble the centuries-old hero stories and court tales of Joseph and Moses in
the land of Egypt” (Brubaker 2003b, 793). Then, in chapter 7, Daniel transitions
into recounting his dreams and visions about the future events of Israel and other
nations. The entire book can be outlined as follows:
I. Historical Setting, 1
A. Exiled to Babylon (1:1–7)
B. Faithfulness to God (1:8–16)
C. Promotion for Daniel and his friends (1:17–21)
202 Old Testament Survey
1. A rather common evangelical position is “that the four metals in the statue
predicted the four major empires of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and
Rome” (Brubaker 2003b, 794).
2. A non-evangelical position identifies the kingdoms as Babylonia, Media,
Persia, and Greece.
3. Some evangelicals contend that the fourth kingdom is Greece but still hold
to a conservative date of authorship in the sixth century BC (Arnold and
Beyer 1999, 434).
11 What are the four beasts The authors of this course agree with the first viewpoint. That is, we believe
in Daniel, and what four that the kingdoms symbolized are Babylon, Media-Persia, Greece, and Rome:
kingdoms do they represent?
• Babylon was represented by a head of gold and the lion with wings.
Soaring over all kingdoms, Babylon was as fierce as a lion, cruel, and
quick to conquer and punish. The wings torn off the lion may represent the
great change in Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 4). Some individuals believe that
Nebuchadnezzar was truly converted (7:4).
• Media-Persia was symbolized by the statue’s chest of silver and the bear,
which was raised up on one side to demonstrate the superior strength of
Persia over Media.
• Greece was represented by the bronze belly of the statue and the leopard
with four wings and four heads. The wings demonstrated the swiftness of
Greece’s conquering power, and the four heads probably represented the
four generals under Alexander the Great. After Alexander’s death, his four
generals divided his kingdom into four parts.
• Rome was symbolized by the iron/clay in the statue and the terrible beast
of Daniel 7. Note that Rome was too terrible to compare with any animal.
Some believe the ten horns that came up on the beast refer to the same
ten kings John mentions in Revelation (Revelation 17:12). The horn with
eyes and a mouth represents the Antichrist, who conquers the ten kings
and rules the world (Daniel 7:8, 24). It appears that the Antichrist will
persecute the Tribulation saints for three and one-half years (7:21–25;
12:7; Revelation 12:6, 14). Then Christ will defeat the kingdom of the
Antichrist, and He will reign and rule forever.
12 Describe the three views Evangelicals hold several different viewpoints about the end-time,
different evangelicals hold particularly about the order of events such as the Rapture, the Tribulation, and
concerning the Millennium. the Millennium. Three views exist concerning the Millennium (the one-thousand-
year reign of Christ):
204 Old Testament Survey
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
13
CHAPTER
10 What are some other themes of Daniel, and how are they conveyed?
Other primary themes of the book include (1) the arrogance of rulers and other individuals who fail to
acknowledge that God indeed is the Supreme Ruler and (2) the guaranteed future divine victory over all evil.
Secondary themes include prayer and the general prophetic message. The themes in Daniel are conveyed in its
narrative structure.
11 What are the four beasts in Daniel, and what four kingdoms do they represent?
The lion with wings symbolizes Babylon. The bear represents Media-Persia. The leopard with four wings and
four heads represents Greece. The terrible beast symbolizes Rome.
12 Describe the three views different evangelicals hold concerning the Millennium.
(1) Premillennial view: Christ will return before the Millennium. (2) Postmillennial view: Christ will return after
the Millennium. (3) Amillennial view: A literal millennium will not occur because Revelation 20 is symbolic.
14
208 Old Testament Survey
kia in
Je iakim
h
Ze iach
Kings of JUDAH de
ho
ho
Je
Ez. Neh.
70-year captivity Zerub. (Ezra 1–6) Esther 7–10
Jeremiah
586 539
14.1
Haggai: The Prophet of Rebuilding the Temple
LESSON Author, Date, and Setting
Conservative scholars attribute authorship of this book to Haggai on the
basis of Haggai 1:1 and other internal biblical evidence. The prophet Haggai
is mentioned nine times in this book and twice in Ezra (Ezra 5:1; 6:14). We
14.1.1
OBJECTIVE know little about Haggai except that he was an exile who responded to Cyrus’s
summarize the setting, invitation to return to the homeland. We also know that his prophetic ministry
purposes, and theme of began in 520 BC, likely during the fall season (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 464).
haggai. According to Ezra 3:8–10, the first group of Jews laid the foundation for
the new temple in 536 BC. However, soon after this, opposition arose among
the Samaritans and other people, and work on the temple ceased in 534 BC.
Discouraged, the people stopped working on God’s house and started building
their own homes. No work on the temple occurred for sixteen years! Then
Haggai and Zechariah began to encourage and exhort the people to begin
rebuilding the temple again. Four years later, the people finished the temple,
and it was dedicated in 517–516 BC (Ezra 4–6).
1 What was Haggai’s Soon after returning from exile, the Jews had turned to selfish priorities because
primary theme? of persistent opposition and discouragement. They had allowed concern for their
own well-being to replace concern for spiritual matters. Thus, Haggai’s message was
intended to set their priorities straight. In other words, his primary purpose and theme
was to inspire the Jews to rebuild the temple and therefore receive God’s blessings.
Specifically, Haggai prophesied to encourage Zerubbabel, Judah’s governor, and
Joshua, the high priest, to lead the Jews in the work of rebuilding the temple.
14.1.2 Outline
OBJECTIVE
discuss how haggai Haggai’s theme is conveyed through four messages, as outlined below:
conveyed his theme. I. First Message: Put God First—Finish the Temple, 1
A. Date: 1 Elul (August 29) 520 BC (1:1)
2 What four messages
B. Haggai rebukes the people (1:2–11)
convey Haggai’s theme?
C. The people’s response (1:12–15)
II. Second Message: God’s Presence Matters More Than Beauty, 2:1–9
A. Date: 21 Tishri (October 17) 520 BC (2:1)
B. Zerubbabel’s temple compared to Solomon’s temple (2:2–9)
III. Third Message: It Is Easier to Spread Sin Than Holiness, 2:10–19
A. Date: 24 Kislev (December 18) 520 BC (2:10)
B. Sin corrupts (2:11–14)
C. Obedience brings blessings (2:15–19)
IV. Fourth Message: The Day of the Lord Will Exalt the Godly, 2:20–23
A. Date: 24 Kislev (December 18) 520 BC (2:20)
B. God will shake and judge the nations (2:21–22)
C. Zerubbabel will be like a signet ring (2:23)
210 Old Testament Survey
14.2
Zechariah: The Prophet of Visionary
Encouragement
LESSON
Author, Date, and Setting
The book of Zechariah can be divided into two major sections: chapters 1–8 and
chapters 9–14. Although scholars agree that the prophet Zechariah wrote the first
14.2.1
OBJECTIVE section around 520–518 BC, they disagree about authorship of the second section.
describe the times, Some speculate that a second or even a third author wrote Zechariah 9–14. They point
purposes, and eight to differences in literary styles and vocabulary as well as the changing historical and
visions of Zechariah. political circumstances to support their position. However, conservative scholars
affirm the unity of the book and attribute authorship of all chapters to Zechariah. They
emphasize similarities in vocabulary and literary style in the two sections and assert
that any differences do not necessarily demonstrate a change of authorship.
Therefore, this course considers the author of the entire book to be Zechariah
(1:1). While the Old Testament lists some thirty-two different individuals with
the same name, this was Zechariah, son of Berekiah. Like Jeremiah and Ezekiel,
he was both a priest and a prophet. Zechariah was a Levite and the head of the
priestly family of Iddo (1:1; Nehemiah 12:16). He was born in Babylon and
apparently returned to Jerusalem with the first group of exiles.
Outline
I. Eight Visions, 1:7–6:8
A. The horseman among the myrtle trees (1:7–17)
B. The four horns and four craftsmen (1:18–21)
C. A man measuring Jerusalem (2)
D. The cleansing of Joshua the high priest (3)
E. The gold lampstand and two olive trees (4)
F. The flying scroll (5:1–4)
G. The woman in a basket (5:5–11)
H. The four chariots (6:1–8)
II. The Symbolic Crowning of Joshua the High Priest, 6:9–15
III. Fasting and the Future, 7–8
A. Fasting and social justice (7)
B. Zion will be restored (8)
212 Old Testament Survey
The two olive trees symbolized constant fuel (olive oil) for
the lamps. The oil flowed into a bowl that had seven small
5. Gold lampstand
pipes and then flowed down the pipes into seven lamps. In
and two olive trees
the same way, the Holy Spirit flowed through Zerubbabel and
(4)
Joshua to empower others. God wanted the Jews to be a
light to the nations.
6. Flying scroll Sinners would be punished and removed from Judah. God
(5:1–4) must judge sinners wherever He finds them.
7 What does the vision in Note that in the vision of the high priest’s cleansing (Zechariah 3), Satan accused
Zechariah 3 point out, and the high priest of sin. This represents the failure of the priesthood in Israel to serve
what does this represent? God faithfully in their God-given capacity. Yet God rebuked Satan. God would restore
the priests’ proper office and ministry in the temple. Further, He would raise up a
“Branch” (3:8; 6:12) to usher in a new age of new people with a new heart. While
the term Branch occurs a few times in the Old Testament, it is clear from Zechariah’s
prophecy that it refers to the Messiah, Jesus Christ (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 466).
The Postexilic Prophets (Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi) 213
8 What are the New At the same time, in Zechariah 9–14, God promises the coming of the Chief
Testament fulfillments of Shepherd—the Messiah. Some prophecies in these chapters were completely
Zechariah’s messianic fulfilled through Jesus’ first coming. Others were partially fulfilled when Jesus came
prophecies?
the first time and will be completely fulfilled when He comes again. For instance,
Zechariah prophesied that Israel’s king would come riding on a donkey and would
bring lasting peace (9:9–17). This, of course, was partially fulfilled when Jesus rode
a donkey into Jerusalem, often referred to as His triumphal entry (Matthew 21:5).
But the complete fulfillment of lasting peace is obviously still to come in the
eschatological age (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 468). Zechariah then prophesied that
the Chief Shepherd would be struck down (13:7–9). This was completely fulfilled
in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ when He died for our sins. Other New Testament
fulfillments of Zechariah’s prophecies are listed in the following chart.
Hill and Walton note: “Zechariah has more to say about the messianic
shepherd-king than any other Old Testament book except Isaiah. This
foreshadowing of the Son of Man as Messiah is explained to the disciples by
Jesus Himself as a method of Old Testament interpretation (cf. Luke 24:44)”
(2000, 540).
To summarize the book of Zechariah, Brubaker states:
The Book of Zechariah was a powerful word of encouragement to postexilic
Jews. The colorful imagery of the night visions gave the people incentive to
rebuild their temple. God was still very much involved in present history. The
prophetic promises of the later oracles reminded them that they were God’s
people; he had not forgotten them. Though future trials would come, God would
be with them. They would experience his forgiveness, spiritual cleansing, and
holiness. God would be with them till the end of time. (2003a, 813)
214 Old Testament Survey
14.3
Malachi: The Prophet of Giving One’s Best
LESSON Author and Date
Because the word malachi means “my messenger,” some scholars assert that
this is not a proper name and that the authorship of Malachi is anonymous. Yet other
scholars take an entirely different view. They contend that the most natural reading of
14.3.1
OBJECTIVE the biblical text is to consider Malachi a proper name and an ascription of authorship.
discuss the setting and This course takes the latter viewpoint that a prophet named Malachi is the author.
time of malachi’s ministry. Malachi keeps the focus on God’s message and away from the messenger
(himself). Therefore, we do not know much about this prophet other than that he
9 What internal biblical lived in Jerusalem. While the book itself does not refer to particular historical
evidence points to the time dates or events, the internal biblical evidence points strongly to a date after the
period when Malachi was
Exile. This evidence includes references to a governor, a temple, and similar
written?
social conditions to the age of Ezra and Nehemiah. In fact, some references and
similarities indicate that Malachi may have been a contemporary of Nehemiah.
However, some Bible scholars suggest that because Ezra and Nehemiah are
not specifically mentioned in the book, Malachi’s prophetic ministry may
have occurred before they came to Judah (Brubaker 2003a, 833). Due to this
uncertainty, we cannot pin the date of Malachi’s writing to a specific date, but we
can surmise that Malachi wrote his book sometime in the range of 470–420 BC.
Setting
As with Haggai and Zechariah, the historical background of Malachi
involves the political, social, and religious conditions that existed after the Exile.
Having returned and settled into their homeland, the people once again became
careless and apathetic in their spirituality. While they had not yet fully rebelled
against God, their disobedience was leading them in that direction. They had
begun disobeying the Law and were not giving God their best, whether in time,
finances, marital relationships, or worship practices. It was then that Malachi
arrived on the scene, encouraging the people to give only their best to God.
Outline
11 What are the six The book of Malachi is structured around six disputes or debates between the
disputes, or messages, people of Israel and God. Even the priests sometimes argued with God. These disputes
in Malachi that center on focus on ten questions raised by the people in response to God’s charges against them.
questions the people raised?
Further, “the six disputations center on God’s nature” (Brubaker 2003a, 834).
I. First Message: God Has Loved Israel, 1:2–5
Question 1: How have You loved us? (1:2)
II. Second Message: Israel Has Dishonored God, 1:6–2:9
Question 2: How have we shown contempt for Your name? (1:6)
Question 3: How have we defiled You? (1:7)
The Postexilic Prophets (Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi) 215
III. Third Message: Judah Has Been Unfaithful in Two Ways, 2:10–16
Question 4: Why does the Lord not pay attention to our offerings? (2:14)
IV. Fourth Message: The Lord Will Come Suddenly, 2:17–3:6
Question 5: How have we wearied Him? (2:17)
Question 6: Where is the God of justice? (2:17)
V. Fifth Message: Return to the Lord, 3:7–12
Question 7: How are we to return? (3:7)
Question 8: How do we rob You? (3:8)
VI. Sixth Message: Israel Has Said Harsh Things against God, 3:13–18
Question 9: What have we said against You? (3:13)
Question 10: What did we gain by carrying out Your requirements? (3:14)
VII. Seventh Message: The Day of the Lord Is Coming, 4:1–6
Content
In reading Malachi, remember that in spite of the people’s recent deliverance
from exile, their current conditions looked negative and bleak to them. Although
they had worked hard with good motivation, they had encountered opposition
and great difficulty in rebuilding the temple and the walls of Jerusalem. To them,
this meant that they had somehow displeased the Lord and were reaping the
consequences. As a result, the people had grown cynical: If this was the way God
was going to treat them, why should they bother giving their best to God? Yet
negative circumstances in life are not necessarily a result of God’s discipline or
judgment. They sometimes simply result from living in a fallen world.
God responded to His people’s questions by assuring them of His love and
compassion for them. Still, He did have some charges to bring against them.
For instance, although the people acknowledged that God was their “King” and
“Lord,” they brought unhealthy animals to sacrifice in violation of the God-
given law. Their actions did not match their words and therefore demonstrated
insincerity. God desired that they bring their very best because He is worthy of
respect, reverence, and devotion.
Other issues involved marriage. Some of the people were marrying outside
the faith and being led into idolatry by their spouses. In other cases, when a
couple became older, the husband divorced the wife of his youth and married
someone he perceived as younger and prettier. Divorce became rampant for
unlawful reasons. It is in this context that God stated through the prophet, “I
hate divorce” (Malachi 2:16). While other biblical passages discuss divorce
and remarriage from different perspectives, in this passage God declares His
detachment from divorce without offering further qualifications. Nevertheless,
God’s ideal is lifetime commitment in marriage.
Another charge involved the giving of finances to God. The law of Moses
instructed the people to give God 10 percent of their income—a tithe. The tithe
was to remind them that everything they had was from God’s hand. However, the
people were failing to bring their tithe. One scholar notes,
A major area in which some heart-searching needed to be done was in giving
to the work of God. So the Lord counters their question with one of His own:
“Will a man rob God? Yet you are robbing Me!” (v. 8). It is an incredible
question, for how can a mere man rob Almighty God? Impossible, but it was
happening! (Wolf 1976, 107)
216 Old Testament Survey
Once again, Malachi called attention to the Lord’s consistent attributes: God
is compassionate, changeless, the true King and Lord of all, and Creator of all,
and He showers blessings on us. Malachi exhorted the people to shake off their
apathy and carelessness; appreciate God’s numerous gifts (including deliverance
out of the Exile); and sacrifice the very best in time, finances, worship, and
service to the King of kings and Lord of lords—giving Him the very best.
12 The book of Malachi The book closes on a command and a promise. The command is to remember
closes with what command the Torah of Moses (Mal. 4:4). God had given Israel his words of guidance
and what promise? for a blessed life (Ps. 119). We, too, should heed God’s commands. The Jews
were to wait for the promised “Elijah” (4:5–6). This “Elijah” would be the
forerunner of the great day of the Lord. God had future plans for his people.
Thus the Old Testament ends on a note of expectancy for the Lord’s coming.
(Brubaker 2003a, 835)
The Postexilic Prophets (Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi) 217
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
14
CHAPTER
1. Who was governor of Judah during the time of 6. Zechariah’s messianic prophecy about thirty
Haggai? pieces of silver was quoted in
a) Ezra a) Matthew.
b) Zerubbabel b) Mark.
c) Nehemiah c) Luke.
d) Joshua d) John.
2. Haggai prophesied that the 7. Zechariah 9:9 prophesied that the Messiah
a) rebuilt temple would be identical to the former a) would be pierced.
temple. c) was the Chief Shepherd.
b) rebuilt temple would be larger than the former b) would be sold for thirty pieces of silver.
temple. d) would ride on a donkey as Israel’s king.”
c) glory of God would be the same in the rebuilt
8. malachi means
temple.
a) “God is my judge.”
d) glory of God would be greater in the rebuilt
c) “the Lord is my refuge.”
temple.
b) “the Lord hides.”
3. Haggai’s fourth message emphasized that d) “my messenger.”
a) the people were to put God first.
9. The purpose of the book of Malachi is to
b) sin is contagious but holiness is not.
a) call God’s people back to spiritual vitality.
c) the Day of the Lord will exalt the godly.
b) encourage the people to rebuild the wall of
d) God’s presence is more important than beauty.
Jerusalem.
4. The book of Zechariah is divided into how many c) proclaim judgment against Judah.
major sections? d) proclaim judgment against Babylon.
a) Two
10. In Malachi, God brought charges against His
b) Three
people for
c) Four
a) oppressing the poor and committing social
d) Five
injustice.
5. In Zechariah, the truth that Israel’s sin and b) displeasing Him and reaping the consequences.
wickedness would be sent away was illustrated by the c) engaging in unlawful divorce and failing to tithe.
a) four chariots. d) questioning His power and authority.
b) woman in a basket.
c) four horns and four craftsmen.
d) horseman among the myrtle trees.
218 Old Testament Survey
11 What are the six disputes, or messages, in Malachi that center on questions the people raised?
(1) God has loved Israel (1:2–5). (2) Israel has dishonored God (1:6–2:9). (3) Judah has been unfaithful in two
ways (2:10–16). (4) The Lord will come suddenly (2:17–3:6). (5) Return to the Lord (3:7–12). (6) Israel has
said harsh things against God (3:13–18).
12 The book of Malachi closes with what command and what promise?
The command was to remember the law of Moses (Malachi 4:4). God had given Israel His words of guidance
for a blessed life. The promise was the coming “Elijah,” who would be the forerunner of the great day of the
Lord (4:5–6). God had future plans for His people.
15
220 Old Testament Survey
The Connection
CHAPTER (The Old and New Testaments)
After surveying the entire Old Testament, a few issues remain for
consideration: How does the Old Testament relate to the New Testament? In
view of divine inspiration of all Scripture, how do believers determine what Old
Testament principles and commands apply today?
The Old Testament lays the groundwork for the New Testament. Without the
Old Testament, it would be difficult to understand the New. But is that its only
purpose? According to 2 Timothy 3:16, “all Scripture is God-breathed and is
useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.” The word
God-breathed is often referred to as inspiration. Thus, this verse tells us that all
Scripture is inspired. Certainly that includes the Old Testament.
However, believers encounter numerous difficulties in interpreting the Old
Testament text if they attempt to apply every Old Testament statement to life
today. Whereas some individuals and groups assert that all or nearly all of the
Old Testament should be enforced in our age, others contend that nothing in the
Old Testament is for the believer today. In fact, Marcion, a key person in early
church history, believed that the Old Testament should not be part of the biblical
canon. Some of Marcion’s ideas appear to have come full circle from the second
century to our own times.
In this last chapter of our study, we will attempt to address these issues in a
biblically balanced way. Based on the principle that all Scripture is God-inspired,
we will examine the relationship between the two testaments and consider the
Old Testament’s relevance to today’s believers.
15.1
The Discontinuity
Both continuity (similarities) and discontinuity (differences) exist between
LESSON the Old and New Testaments. Some conservative scholars see more similarities
than differences, while other scholars see the opposite. Both of these groups try
to avoid extremes, but it is easy to go too far in either direction. Although we will
discuss both positions, the authors of this course contend that the testaments have
15.1.1
OBJECTIVE more continuity than discontinuity.
explain the differences In this lesson, we will consider the discontinuity between the testaments.
between the old and new Although space will not allow us to enumerate all the distinctions, the following
Testaments. are four significant differences:
• The political and historical contexts during Old Testament times differed
1 What are some from the political and historical contexts of New Testament times.
significant differences
(discontinuity) between the • The Old Testament ends with the impression that this is an unfinished
Old and New Testaments? story. The Messiah has not yet come, and the cycles of sin and spiritual
revitalization, of oppression and deliverance, continue. The New Testament
begins with the first coming of the Messiah and ends with His promised return.
2 What is meant by • Old Testament Israelites are considered the revelatory people of God, and
revelatory people and New Testament believers are the soteriological people of God (Hill and
soteriological people? Walton 2000, 568). That is, God revealed His covenant plan, stipulations,
and commands—His law—through the nation of Israel, His revelatory
people. Yet in the New Testament, God brought grace and salvation
to individuals, meaning that believers are God’s soteriological people.
(soteriology is the theological study of salvation.) This does not infer that
an individual relationship with God was unimportant in the Old Testament.
It simply means that the primary purpose of God’s revelation was national
in the Old Testament and individual in the New Testament.
• Somewhat related to the other distinctions is the difference in the sacrificial
requirements of the two testaments or covenants. In the Old Testament,
as the people looked forward to the Messiah’s coming, God instituted an
annual sacrifice of a lamb to atone for the people’s sins. They were also
to make other offerings and sacrifices as the Law commanded. However,
in the New Testament, the Messiah and Son of God, Jesus Christ, perfect
God and perfect man, atoned for the sins of humankind once and for all
(Hebrews 10:1–18). Interestingly, God exercised both His love and His
wrath when Jesus Christ substituted himself for every sinner in every age
in every nation. The atonement of His shed blood covers our every sin so
that we are forgiven and never have to offer animal sacrifices again. How
could the believer understand the significance of the Messiah’s actions if
not for the Old Testament’s unifying themes of atonement and sacrifice?
In addition to these differences, many perceive a sharp contrast between the
Old Testament God of wrath and the New Testament God of love. However, Hill
and Walton disagree:
Perhaps the contrasts between the nature of God in the Old Testament and in the
New Testament have been too simplistic or shallow. One often hears that in the
Old Testament God can be seen as a God of judgment and punishment, while
in the New Testament he is personified as a God of love and salvation. This is
an inappropriate dichotomy. When we consider the span of history covered in
the Old Testament and witness God’s patience with Israel over centuries at a
time in the face of deep-seated and obvious violation of the most basic terms
222 Old Testament Survey
15.2
The Continuity
The concept of continuity means that the Scriptures are unified in their divine
LESSON intent and purpose. That is, the Old and New Testaments are connected in some
way. What things do they have in common? How are they similar? What themes
tie the two testaments together? How did Jesus and the New Testament authors
view the Old Testament?
15.2.1
OBJECTIVE Perhaps we could describe the canon of Scripture at the end of the Old
explain the similarities Testament as the end of “act one” of a two-act play. . . . The plot has been
and unity between the old established: A fallen human race needs redemption and reconciliation. The
and new Testaments. key players have been introduced: a holy God and his chosen people. . . .
But the tension of the story remains unresolved. God’s people are back in
their own land, but they are a subject nation. What happened to visions of
national grandeur? There is a sense of unfulfilled expectations: Where is
that final messianic figure who will break the chains of sin and usher in a
new age of peace? . . . It would be four hundred years between Malachi and
Matthew. History doesn’t stop. Kings and kingdoms came and went. But God’s
redemptive plan stayed on schedule. When the time was right, Jesus would
bring salvation to both Jews and Gentiles (Galatians 4:4). God’s kingdom
arrived in the person of his Son. (Brubaker 2003a, 836–837)
3 What is the promise- This dynamic redemptive and historical context highlights some of the unifying
fulfillment motif between the themes of the Old and New Testaments. First, Brubaker’s two-act play imagery
testaments? illustrates what scholars call salvation history or heilsgeschichte (a German term). In
other words, the testaments tell the history of God’s redemptive actions, promises,
and fulfillments. In relation to salvation history, we can make two observations:
1. The testaments have a promise-fulfillment motif in that a significant
amount of what is promised in the Old Testament is fulfilled in the
New. “Christianity has been clear from its very inception that the
New Testament fulfills and complements the Old. The Gospel writers’
genealogies of Jesus (Matthew 1:1–16; Luke 3:23–28) explicitly affirmed
that the Messiah has arrived, and that he is the culmination and fulfillment
of the Old Testament prophecies” (Arnold and Beyer 1999, 475).
The Connection (The Old and New Testaments) 223
4 What are some evidences Yet the scope of the testaments’ relationship extends further than just these first
of the literary relationship two aspects. The Old and New Testaments have an incredible literary relationship.
between the two testaments? Not only does the New Testament contain a significant number of quotations
from and allusions to the Old Testament, but also literary devices and language
techniques used by the New Testament authors appear to be strongly influenced by
the Old Testament. “One scholar has counted 295 separate explicit references to the
Old Testament, occupying some 352 verses of the New” (Arnold and Beyer 1999,
476). “The New Testament made extensive use of the Old Testament in the form
of direct quotation and indirect allusion. In fact, according to careful calculation,
approximately 32 percent—nearly one-third—of the New Testament is composed
of Old Testament quotations and allusions” (Hill and Walton 2000, 555–556).
5 What is the historical As we have already suggested, the Old Testament is undoubtedly the
connection between the Old historical basis for the New Testament. No contemporary reader could truly
and New Testaments? understand the New Testament’s themes and purposes without the historical
information and background described in the Old Testament. With that in mind,
6 Name some themes we can affirm that the Old Testament is also the theological foundation of the
that are emphasized in both New. Many theological themes on which biblical doctrines are based are first
testaments.
introduced and sometimes explained in the Old Testament. The New Testament
expands on these themes and explains them in terms of their fulfillment. In some
cases, New Testament authors assumed that major themes of Scripture (such as
creation, sin, and redemption) were already familiar to their readers because of
the readers’ acquaintance with the Old Testament. Among the themes emphasized
in both testaments are (1) God’s sovereignty, (2) God as the one true God,
(3) God’s holiness, (4) God’s transcendence, (5) God’s righteousness and justice,
(6) God’s compassion and grace, (7) the covenant, and (8) God’s loyalty.
15.3
The Relevance
Is the Old Testament truly relevant to our lives today? Arnold and Beyer state,
LESSON
Some today would say the Old Testament does not relate to modern culture;
indeed, even many Christians cut it from their Bible, either intentionally or by
neglect. But with the earliest Christians we must assert that the Old Testament
is God’s word for our times! The question is not whether we should read both
15.3.1
OBJECTIVE Testaments, but rather how we should read them together. (1999, 475)
List principles for Thus, both the continuity and discontinuity of the Old and New Testaments
evaluating how to must be discussed in terms of basic principles of interpretation (a discipline
determine whether an old called hermeneutics). We must understand which laws or concepts were meant
Testament passage applies to be universal and which were uniquely designed for the intended theocracy of
to believers today. Israel under the old covenant. As we have noted, New Testament believers are
not to sacrifice animals or consider such laws as a divine command for today. But
why not? How do we determine whether an Old Testament passage is prescriptive
for our times? What principles of biblical interpretation (hermeneutics) should
we use? Following are three principles to use as guidelines:
224 Old Testament Survey
15.3.2 • descriptive versus prescriptive: The Old and New Testaments include
OBJECTIVE both descriptive and prescriptive passages. That is, some passages are
apply the principles to an intended only to describe behavior, while others are meant to prescribe
assigned old Testament or encourage certain behavior or actions. For instance, while the intent
passage, and state whether of Old Testament narrative is to teach both history and theology, the
that particular passage is biblical record of David’s adultery and murder is not meant to be a divine
applicable today. prescription for believers to commit similar acts. It is simply a descriptive
passage of what David did. In fact, the theological intent may be to assert
7 What is the descriptive/ that we should rely on God’s power to resist such temptations when they
prescriptive principle? confront us.
8 How should a reader apply • noting the context: According to this principle, readers or interpreters should
the hermeneutics principle that pay attention to the immediate context of the phrase in question; they should
notes the context? look at the surrounding words to better understand the statement’s meaning.
Readers should then consider the context of the verse, the chapter, and the
entire book of the Bible. Further, they should determine whether a New
Testament passage interprets an Old Testament passage.
One cannot ignore the perspective of Jesus himself, who insisted that
many of the Old Testament writers were writing of him (Luke 24:27, 44;
John 5:39, 46; 12:41). . . . He seemed to have in mind more than the
obvious messianic prophecies. The most plausible suggestion is that
Christ was speaking of the way his ministry—and especially his atoning
death—played a central role in the plan of God (Matthew 5:17;
Mark 10:45) that had been initiated at creation and was traced throughout
the Old Testament. (Hill and Walton 2000, 569)
9 What laws from the Old • Principles regarding old Testament law: The Old Testament law was
Testament are authoritative designed for the nation of Israel in the context of God’s intended theocracy
for people today? and the multitude’s constant traveling and camping. Many of the laws
were for the protection of their health in these unique circumstances. As
a result, some scholars advocate a principle of distinguishing between
the Old Testament’s civil and ceremonial laws and its moral laws. Others
propose a related principle that only the laws that are renewed in the New
Testament are prescriptive or authoritative for the believer today. Applying
these two principles in harmony solves some of the perplexing issues
raised in certain Old Testament passages. That is, since Christ has fulfilled
the ceremonial laws, and the civil laws were intended for Israel’s unique
context, the civil and ceremonial laws do not apply to today’s believers.
However, the moral laws such as the Ten Commandments still apply (are
prescriptive) because of their moral nature and because most of them were
renewed in the New Testament.
In regard to the Ten Commandments, some may note a discrepancy in the
days set aside for the Sabbath. Although Saturday was the original Sabbath Day
as established in the Old Testament, many hold that the New Testament believers
changed the day of worship to Sunday to commemorate Jesus’ resurrection on the
first day of the week. In addition, Paul instructed believers to bring their offerings
on the first day of the week: Sunday. In any case, the principle of setting one day
aside during the week for worship and rest is continued in the New Testament.
In sum, the Old Testament—in its entirety—is not intended to be normative
or authoritative for the believer today. Contending that all of the Old Testament is
prescriptive leads to legalism, which is condemned in the New Testament. At the
same time, it is wrong to conclude that none of the Old Testament is normative or
authoritative for us. To do so is to destroy many of the Old Testament’s foundations
The Connection (The Old and New Testaments) 225
and explanations of biblically balanced doctrines. The correct view lies somewhere
between the two extremes. Old Testament scholar John Bright explains,
That the Old Testament cannot be, in all its parts, directly normative for the
Christian is obvious. It contains much—ancient laws and customs, ancient
institutions and ways of thinking—that cannot serve as a model for Christian
faith and practice, as well as attitudes and actions that are not safe guides for the
Christian conscience to follow. . . . But—and it cannot be repeated too often—
this line must not be drawn in such a way that we are betrayed once again into
a selective or one sided use of the Old Testament. The problem of the Old
Testament is not to be solved by subtraction. (1991, 141)
10 What results from the Believers should understand the discontinuity and continuity between
two extremes of seeing all or the testaments without overemphasizing either aspect. Both testaments are
none of the Old Testament as authoritative for the believer when proper hermeneutical principles are applied to
prescriptive?
determine correct interpretations of biblical passages.
Modern-day believers must recognize the Old Testament as the inspired
Word of God, just like the New Testament. Jesus and the New Testament
authors frequently quoted and alluded to Old Testament passages, events, and
literary vocabulary. The Old Testament opens the pages of history, sees God’s
sovereign hand at work through the actions of peoples and nations, traces the
history of redemption, and introduces the promises that are fulfilled in the New
Testament—including the numerous prophecies of the Messiah, Jesus Christ.
The continuity of the two testaments, as well as Jesus’ life, death, and
resurrection, helps believers more fully understand the Old Testament and
appreciate God’s forgiveness, compassion, grace, and sovereignty. The message
of both testaments is reflected in the words of a well-known hymn: “To God be
the glory, great things He hath done. So loved He the world, that He gave us His
Son.” With a clear understanding of the Old Testament in relation to the New, let
us declare this glory of God among the nations!
226 Old Testament Survey
T Test Yourself
Circle the letter of the best answer.
15
CHAPTER
1. The differences between the Old and New 6. heilsgeschichte is a German term for
Testaments are called their a) continuity.
a) alignment. b) salvation history.
b) continuity. c) descriptive history.
c) discontinuity. d) prescriptive history.
d) uniformity.
7. The Old and New Testaments should be read
2. The people of God in the New Testament are a) independently because of their differences.
known as b) independently, focusing on the unified portions.
a) soteriological. c) together, ignoring the differences between the two.
b) revelatory. d) together, acknowledging their unity and diversity.
c) anticipatory.
8. A passage of Scripture that relates historical
d) legalistic.
details without intending to teach behavior is
3. A difference between the Old and New a) prescriptive.
Testaments involves the b) reflective.
a) holiness of God. c) descriptive.
b) sovereignty of God. d) normative.
c) transcendence of God.
9. A phrase’s surrounding words or verses is called its
d) historical and political contexts.
a) context.
4. One difference between the testaments relates to b) description.
a) salvation history. c) prescription.
b) sacrificial requirements. d) Old Testament law.
c) the Sabbath Day concept.
10. Using solid principles of interpretation, believers
d) God’s promises and their fulfillment.
should see the entire Old Testament as
5. Scholars refer to the Scriptures’ unity in divine a) normative.
intent and purpose as b) prescriptive.
a) continuity. c) descriptive.
b) discontinuity. d) both prescriptive and descriptive.
c) alignment.
d) uniformity.
The Connection (The Old and New Testaments) 227
10 What results from the two extremes of seeing all or none of the Old Testament as prescriptive?
Asserting that all of the Old Testament is prescriptive leads to legalism, which is condemned in the New
Testament. Asserting that none of the Old Testament is prescriptive destroys much of the Old Testament’s
foundations and explanations of biblically balanced doctrines.
B Reference List
Archer, Gleason, Jr. 1978. A Survey of Old Testament Introduction. Chicago: Moody Press.
Arnold, Bill T. 1998. Encountering the Book of Genesis. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
Arnold, Bill T., and Bryan E. Beyer. 1999. Encountering the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
Barker, Kenneth, gen. ed. 1985. The NIV Study Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.
Barnes, William. “Canaan: Conquest, Covenant Renewal, and Crisis.” In Williams 2003, 357–408.
Blocher, Henri. 1984. In the Beginning: The Opening Chapters of Genesis. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Boice, James Montgomery. 1996. The Minor Prophets. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications.
Braddy, Dwaine. 2003. “Just Stayin’ Alive: Judah from Rehoboam to Hezekiah.” In Williams 2003, 647–688.
Bright, John. 1991. The Authority of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
Brubaker, Malcolm. 2003a. “The Lord Brought Back the Captives to Zion.” In Williams 2003, 801–840.
———. 2003b. “On the Edge of Night: Judah from Manasseh to the Exile.” In Williams 2003, 753–800.
Brueggeman, Dale. 2003a. “Israel Acquires Empire.” In Williams 2003, 457–510.
———. 2003b. “Sweet Singers and Sages: Israel’s Poetry and Wisdom.” In Williams 2003, 511–554.
Carr, G. Lloyd. 1984. The Song of Solomon: An Introduction and Commentary. Vol. 17 of Tyndale Old
Testament Commentaries. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Douglas, J. D., ed. 1978. The New Bible Dictionary. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Dyer, Charles, and Eugene Merrill. 2001. Nelson’s Old Testament Survey. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Finley, Thomas J. 1996. Joel, Obadiah and Micah. Everyman’s Bible Commentary. Chicago: Moody Press.
Gaebelein, Frank E., ed. 1990. Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers. Vol. 2 of The Expositor’s Bible
Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Geisler, Norman. 1981. A Popular Survey of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
Good, Edwin M. 1965. Irony in the Old Testament. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.
Harris, R. Laird. 1969. The Inspiration and Canonicity of Scripture. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.
Hill, Andrew E., and John H. Walton. 2000. A Survey of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Horton, Stanley M., ed. 1995. Systematic Theology. Rev. ed. Springfield, MO: Logion Press.
Israel, Richard, and Steve Fettke. 2003. “Hear the Word of the Lord: The Rise of the Prophetic Movement.” In
Williams 2003, 689–752.
Jensen, Irving L. 1968. 1 Kings with Chronicles. Chicago: Moody Bible Institute.
Keil, Carl F., and Franz Delitzsch. 1976. I & II Kings, I & II Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Grand
Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Kidner, Derek. 1981. The Message of Hosea: The Bible Speaks Today. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
230 Old Testament Survey
Kinlaw, Dennis F. 1991. “Song of Songs.” In Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs. Vol. 5 of The
Expositor’s Bible Commentary, ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, 1201. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Leupold, H. C. 1969. Exposition of the Psalms. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
Lint, Gregory A. 1998. The Old Testament Study Bible: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs. Vol. 11 of The
Complete Biblical Library: The Old Testament. Springfield, MO: World Library Press Inc.
Longman, Tremper, III. 1988. How to Read the Psalms. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
McQueen, Larry. 2003. “With a Strong Hand and an Outstretched Arm.” In Williams 2003, 227–264.
Moreland, J. P., and John Mark Reynolds, gen. eds. 1999. Three Views on Creation and Evolution. Grand
Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
New English Bible with the Apocrypha. 1970. London: Oxford University Press.
Raccah, William. 2003. “From Tribal League to Kingdom.” In Williams 2003, 409–456.
Ryken, Leland, and Tremper Longman III, eds. 1993. A Complete Literary Guide to the Bible. Grand Rapids,
MI: Zondervan.
Schultz, Samuel J. 2000. The Old Testament Speaks. 5th ed. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
Smith, Gary V. 1991. Old Testament Survey, Part 2: Job–Malachi. Wheaton, IL: Evangelical Training Association.
Stallman, Robert. 2003. “A Wandering Aramean.” In Williams 2003, 177–226.
Stamps, Donald C., gen. ed. 1992. Full Life Study Bible: New International Version. Grand Rapids, MI:
Zondervan Publishing House.
Westbrook, April. 2003. “Through the Vast and Dreadful Desert.” In Williams 2003, 313–356.
Williams, William C., ed. 2003a. They Spoke from God: A Survey of the Old Testament. Springfield, MO:
Logion Press.
———. 2003b. “In the Beginning.” In Williams 2003, 59–100.
———. 2003c. “Paradise Lost: The Origin and Spread of Human Evil.” In Williams 2003, 101–136.
Wolf, Herbert M. 1976. Haggai and Malachi. Everyman’s Bible Commentary. Chicago: Moody Press.
Wood, Leon J. 1970. A Survey of Israel’s History. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Zuck, Roy. 1978. Job. Everyman’s Bible Commentary. Chicago: Moody Press.
BSB Essential Course Materials 231
Do NOT submit your SLR notes, essays, or other documents; only submit your completed SLR Report Form.
No prior approval is needed as long as the activity fulfills the criteria from number one above.
234 Old Testament Survey
To review sample SLR Reports and to access an online report form, go to this Web address: library.
globaluniversity.edu. Navigate to the Berean School of the Bible Students link under “Quick Link.” Another
helpful resource is our GlobalReach Web site: www.globalreach.org. From that site you can download
materials free of charge from Global University’s School for Evangelism and Discipleship. These proven
evangelism tools are available in many languages.
Service Learning Requirement (SLR) Assignment 235
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
2. Results: What resulted from your own participation in this activity? Include descriptions of people’s
reactions, decisions to accept Christ, confirmed miracles, Spirit and water baptisms, life changes, etc. Describe
the individuals or group who benefited from or participated in your ministry activity. Use numbers to describe
results when appropriate (approximate when unsure).
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Record numbers here: Unbelievers witnessed to?....................... New decisions for Jesus? ........................
Holy Spirit baptisms?....................... Other? ....................................................................................................
3. Refl ection: Answer the following questions based on your experience in completing this assignment:
Did this activity satisfy an evident need in others? How so? ..........................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
Were you adequately prepared to engage in this activity? Why or why not? .................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
What positive or negative feelings were you aware of while you were completing this activity? .................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
In what ways were you aware of the Holy Spirit’s help during your ministry activity? .................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
What would you change if you did this ministry activity again? ...................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
What strengths or weaknesses within yourself did this assignment reveal to you?.........................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Did you receive feedback about this activity? If so, describe: ........................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
236 Old Testament Survey
Unit Progress Evaluations 237
15. Abraham’s servant finding Rebekah as a wife for 21. Which offering atoned for unintentional sins and
Isaac illustrates showed complete surrender to God?
a) God’s sovereignty. a) Burnt offering
b) human free will. b) Sin offering
c) favoritism. c) Grain offering
d) the power of wealth and prestige. d) Guilt offering
16. Jacob’s greatest weakness was 22. A free gift of thanks and praise to God that was
a) his lack of faith. never offered alone described the
b) deception. a) burnt offering.
c) women. b) fellowship offering.
d) wealth. c) grain offering.
d) sin offering.
17. Joseph’s brothers were jealous of
a) Joseph’s good looks and his dreams. 23. Moses’s second speech in the book of Deuteronomy
b) Joseph’s talent and favor with their father. a) centered on the concept of covenant.
c) their father’s favoritism and Joseph’s dreams. b) involved both blessings and curses.
d) their father’s favoritism and Joseph’s good c) commissioned Joshua to be Israel’s leader.
looks. d) reviewed positive and negative aspects of
Israel’s history.
18. The sacrifice of the Passover lamb serves as a
biblical model of 24. Deuteronomy 6:4–5 contains the Jewish Shema,
a) redemption. which means “to
b) justification. a) give.”
c) sanctification. b) honor.”
d) glorification. c) hear.”
d) worship.”
19. In a covenant relationship, the covenant continues
a) as long as it serves the best interests of both 25. Moses’s farewell speech in the book of
parties. Deuteronomy
b) until one party breaks it. a) centered on the concept of covenant.
c) for a period of fifty years. b) involved both blessings and curses.
d) as long as the initiator wills it. c) commissioned Joshua to be Israel’s leader.
20. The Ten Commandments were unique because d) reviewed positive and negative aspects of
Israel’s history.
they required
a) blood sacrifices.
b) responsible behavior toward neighbors.
c) the worship of one true God.
d) people to honor their parents.
After answering all of the questions in this UPE, check your answers with the answer key. Review material
related to questions you may have missed, and then proceed to the next unit.
Unit Progress Evaluations 241
15. Jehoiada the priest had a profound influence on the 20. Ezra was a
life of a) shepherd.
a) Jehoram. b) priest.
b) Uzziah. c) cupbearer.
c) Joash. d) priest and scribe.
d) Asa.
21. Judah went into exile in Babylon for how many
16. Which king of Judah entered the temple to burn years?
incense and died of leprosy? a) 50
a) Amaziah b) 60
b) Uzziah c) 70
c) Jotham d) 80
d) Ahaz
22. Who led the first group of Jews back to Jerusalem
17. Who sought the Lord about the king of Assyria’s after Cyrus issued his decree?
siege of Jerusalem? a) Ezra
a) Uzziah b) Nehemiah
b) Joash c) Zerubbabel
c) Ahaz d) Zechariah
d) Hezekiah
23. The book of Ezra centers on
18. Which king of Judah led a campaign to repair and a) rebuilding Jerusalem’s walls.
restore the temple? b) rebuilding the temple.
a) Amon c) God’s grace and forgiveness.
b) Zedekiah d) God’s judgment and wrath.
c) Josiah 24. The events of Esther took place in
d) Joash a) Israel.
19. How old was Josiah when he became king of Judah? b) Assyria.
a) 8 c) Persia.
b) 18 d) Egypt.
c) 21 25. Who revealed a plot to kill King Xerxes?
d) 25 a) Haman
b) Mordecai
c) Nehemiah
d) Ezra
After answering all of the questions in this UPE, check your answers with the answer key. Review material
related to questions you may have missed, and then proceed to the next unit.
Unit Progress Evaluations 243
15. The entire book of Proverbs was likely compiled 20. Ecclesiastes is based on a Hebrew word that means
around a) “one who is sorrowful.”
a) 300 BC. b) “one who calls people together to talk.”
b) 500 BC. c) “wise speech or parable.”
c) 700 BC. d) “meaningless or futile.”
d) 900 BC.
21. Based on the evidence, the author of Ecclesiastes is
16. Who composed most of the material in Proverbs? a) David.
a) David b) Solomon.
b) Solomon c) inconclusive.
c) Agur d) Samuel.
d) Lemuel
22. Which book warns that life without God is
17. The Hebrew word mashal means meaningless?
a) “to rule.” a) Job
b) “wise speech or saying.” b) Psalms
c) “to obey or respect.” c) Proverbs
d) “head knowledge.” d) Ecclesiastes
18. A literary device that represents a concept or idea 23. The title Song of Songs means this is
as a person is called a) a great song.
a) a metaphor. b) one of the great songs of history.
b) a simile. c) a greater song than others.
c) personification. d) the greatest song.
d) parallelism.
24. Who wrote ten books about the allegorical
19. The book of Proverbs is didactic, meaning it is meanings of Song of Songs?
intended to a) Polycarp
a) teach. b) Origen
b) tell a story. c) Ignatius
c) be poetic. d) Augustine
d) be prophetic.
25. New Testament Christians should view Song of
Songs as a book about
a) the beauty of sexual intimacy in marriage.
b) perverted and sensual sexuality.
c) Christ’s love for the church.
d) God’s love for Israel.
After answering all of the questions in this UPE, check your answers with the answer key. Review material
related to questions you may have missed, and then proceed to the next unit.
Unit Progress Evaluations 245
15. Which prophet did Peter quote on the day of 21. Isaiah 7:14; 9:6–7 prophesy about the Messiah’s
Pentecost? a) incarnation.
a) Amos b) message.
b) Obadiah c) mission.
c) Joel d) second coming.
d) Isaiah
22. One reason Isaiah prophecies judgment is to
16. Isaiah prophesied during the reigns of a) protect the Northern Kingdom from destruction.
a) Pekah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah. b) purify Jerusalem.
b) Ahab, Pekah, Uzziah, and Hezekiah. c) warn of the Day of the Lord.
c) Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah. d) promote a truce with Egypt.
d) Uzziah, Pekah, Ahaz, and Jeroboam.
23. Which Old Testament book contains the
17. How many authors do conservative scholars “servant songs”?
believe wrote the book of Isaiah? a) Jeremiah
a) One b) Ezekiel
b) Two c) Isaiah
c) Three d) Daniel
d) Four
24. The virgin birth of the Messiah is foretold in Isaiah
18. The name Isaiah means a) 7.
a) “burden-bearer.” b) 9.
b) “the Lord is God.” c) 16.
c) “the Lord is salvation.” d) 22.
d) “the Lord is holy.”
25. Themes in the book of Micah include
19. Isaiah was a) the Day of the Lord, social injustice, and
a) a shepherd. true worship.
b) a priest. b) the Day of the Lord, false security, and true
c) a farmer. worship.
d) an educated man and a poet. c) social injustice, true worship, and false security.
d) the Day of the Lord, social injustice, false
20. Who did Isaiah prophesy would deliver Israel security.
from captivity?
a) Cyrus
b) Darius
c) Nebuchadnezzar
d) Xerxes
After answering all of the questions in this UPE, check your answers with the answer key. Review material
related to questions you may have missed, and then proceed to the next unit.
Unit Progress Evaluations 247
16. Haggai encouraged the people to rebuild 21. The term God-breathed is referred to as
a) the walls of Jerusalem. a) “anointing.”
b) a trading center. b) “inspiration.”
c) the temple. c) “continuity.”
d) their houses. d) “discontinuity.”
17. Haggai prophesied to encourage 22. The Old Testament people of God are known as
a) Zerubbabel and Joshua. a) soteriological.
b) Ezra and Nehemiah. b) reactionary.
c) Zerubbabel and Ezra. c) revelatory.
d) Nehemiah and Joshua. d) legalistic.
18. Haggai’s theme is conveyed using command, 23. A difference between the Old and New Testaments
encouragement, warning, and involves God’s
a) declaration of leadership. a) sovereignty.
b) promise of blessing. b) transcendence.
c) prediction of judgment. c) holiness.
d) review of covenant history. d) provision of salvation.
19. Zechariah was born in 24. The similarities of the Old and New Testaments
a) Judah. are referred to as
b) Israel. a) continuity.
c) Babylon. b) alignment.
d) Assyria. c) discontinuity.
d) uniformity.
20. Jesus’ ride into Jerusalem on a donkey was
prophesied by 25. A passage of Scripture that was written with the
a) Isaiah. intent to teach is
b) Jeremiah. a) prescriptive.
c) Zechariah. b) reflective.
d) Micah. c) descriptive.
d) interrogative.
After answering all of the questions in this UPE, check your answers with the answer key. Review material
related to questions you may have missed. Review all materials in preparation for the final exam. Complete
and submit your SLR assignment and take the closed-book final examination.
Answer Keys
Answers below are followed by the number of the objective being tested. For any questions you answered
incorrectly, review the lesson content in preparation for your fi nal exam.
Forms
The following pages contain two course forms: the Round-Tripper and
the Request for a Printed Final Examination.
1. For students who do not have access to e-mail, we are including one
Round-Tripper for your use if you have a question or comment related
to your studies. If you do not have access to the Internet, you will want
to make several photocopies of the Round-Tripper before you write
on it. Retain the copies for submitting additional questions as needed.
Students who have access to e-mail can submit questions at any time to
bsbcontent@globaluniversity.edu.
2. Students who do not have access to the Internet-based tests may request
a printed final examination. For faster service, please call Enrollment
Services at 1-800-443-1083 or fax your Request for a Printed Final
Examination to 417-862-0863.
254 Old Testament Survey
Forms255
ROUND-TRIPPER
Send questions and comments by e-mail to bsbcontent@globaluniversity.edu. If you do not have access to
e-mail, use this form to write to Berean School of the Bible with questions or comments related to your studies.
Write your question in the space provided. Send this form to Berean School of the Bible. The form will make
its return, or round-trip, as Berean School of the Bible responds.
YOUR QUESTION:
PN 02.15.02
256 Old Testament Survey
Forms257