Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Aboriginal Identity: Sally Morgan and My Place.: Morning Herald Said That, "As For My Place, It Deserves A Place - Among

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Aboriginal Identity: Sally Morgan and

My Place.
Nov 20by bejglover

Sally Morgan could be seen as an Aboriginal ambassador, teaching


indigenous Australians to feel pride in their identity rather than shame. Her
biographical book My Place presented an Indigenous perspective of history
and the storytelling mode of the book is deeply connected with Aboriginal
identity. This particular format, though traditional for aboriginal history, is
not conventional of traditional historiography. My Place received great
accolade at the time of its release in 1987 and its importance is evident
through its inclusion in school curriculums. Due to the book’s introduction
of the ‘stolen generations’, it was somewhat controversial and some
historians have critiqued Morgan and her writing. Keith Windschuttle
claims the entire book is fabricated and that Sally Morgan is not even
Aboriginal. In a less negative fashion than Windschuttle, Bain Attwood
questions Sally Morgan’s choice to portray herself as Aboriginal when the
discovery of her Aboriginality was so late in life. On July, 1987, The Sydney
Morning Herald said that, “As for My Place, it deserves a place – among
the classics of Australian biography.”

My Place: The Story

My Place is a biographical chronology of the life of Sally Morgan and


reveals her discovery of Aboriginality in her heritage. The first section of
the book begins as a chronology of Sally’s younger years, with general facts
about school and home. Until age 15, Sally was unaware that she was
Aboriginal and was encouraged to tell other kids at school she was Indian.
After the discovery of her true heritage, Sally digs deeper and decides to
write a book about it. She interviews her mother (Gladys), her grandmother
(Daisy) and her great Uncle (Arthur). Through this research, Sally embarks
on an emotional journey to learn about her family history. She learns,
however, that it is not always the most pleasant. Through interviews with
her family members, Sally discovers that her family had been apart of
removal process in Australia. This meant that some Indigenous children
were removed from their families to be raised in missions run by white,
Anglo-Saxon people teaching the Indigenous children their Christian
values. Her grandmother Daisy lived and worked with the Drake-
Brockmans, a white family owning the Corunna-Downs Station. Sally
Morgan presents a story that is relatable to both Indeigenous and non-
Indigenous Australians. She presents a book/history that forces both white
and indigenous Australians to assess the past whether or not a correct
Aboriginal history has been told in Australia. Morgan also confronts the
indigenous reader with the idea of learning their past and embracing
indigenous identity, even if it is painful. On December 20, 1987, The
Sydney Morning Herald published an article detailing Human Rights
Commission awards presented to Indigenous writers, in which Sally
Morgan was one of them for My Place. :The awards were established by the
Commission to recognise personal endeavours which have promoted the
understanding and public discussion of human rights issues in
Australia.” My Place had been so influential that it affected the Human
Rights Commission and understood that Indigenous issues that were still
prevalent in Australian society at the time of its release in 1987.

Historiography

My Place acts as an indigenous account of history in Australia and provides


it in a way that is injected with emotion. Typically in historiography, the
aim of its writing is “objective and factual, to construct a narrative that is
rational, cool and aspires towards achieving some truth.” (Damousi, The
Emotions of History p. 28) Morgan, though, presents her history as though
she is telling a story, which is connected to Aboriginal identity. More than
often, Indigenous people do not tell their history through the reproduction
of books but through oral history. Oral history causes the person telling the
history/story, and the person listening, to engage more closely with each
other and create a bond. “It is clear, when meeting with Aboriginal people,
that despite or perhaps because of increasing levels of participation in
western post-secondary education, oral tradition and story-telling are still
central to aboriginal personal and community identity.” (Poff, The
Importance of Story-Telling p. 27) The oral history Indigenous Australians
see as a culturally and emotionally important way of telling history, is
incorrect in the academic world where historiography is concerned.

Keith Windschuttle

Windschuttle contests the authenticity of My Place completely and denies


the stolen generations ever occurred. He supports the Drake-Brockmans in
their accusations of falsity towards My Place. “Rather than a tragedy of
white racists stealing children and exploiting Aboriginality, the real Daisy’s
story was one of fulfilment within white society.” (Windschuttle, The
Fabrication of Aboriginal History: Vol 3, p. 320) . Not only does
Windschuttle critique My Place and its authenticity, he goes further to
question whether there is an Aboriginal heritage in the Corruna family at
all. In a photo of Sally’s Grandmother Daisy, at the Drake-Brockman’s
station, Windschuttle exclaims that Daisy is not Aboriginal. “Daisy’s
Melanesian heritage is clearly visible in her thick fuzzy hair, unknown
among Aboriginal people.” Whereas Morgan has worked so hard to make
Indigenous Australians accept the past, people like Windschuttle are still
around to deny anything ever happened to them. He preaches that
Indigenous people should be thankful of white influence, rather than accuse
them of anything, creating only more confusion for some Indigenous
Australians struggling to create an identity.
Bain Attwood

Unlike Windschuttle, Attwood does not critique My Place with the same
negativity. His particular questions in regards to Sally Morgan are “why is
it that Morgan has constructed herself in terms of being Aboriginal?… What
is the unconscious (or conscious) problem that belief in her Aboriginality
solves for Morgan, or what wishes or desires does this belief satisfy?”
(Attwood, Portrait of and Aboriginal as an artist, p. 303) Whilst My
Place has helped to construct Aboriginal identity for indigenous Australians
other than Morgan, Attwood questions why this book has helped them do
so. Identity is a construct and Aboriginal identity is one that Morgan has
adopted late in life rather than being raised with it. “By comparison with
other Aboriginal writers, then, one could argue that Morgan’s Aboriginality
is forged through the creation of the text rather than the reverse.” (p. 303) I
love My Place and think that it is a highly important book that presents an
Aboriginal perspective of the past rather than just non-indigenous
perspectives. However, I agree with Bain Atwood in saying that this book
helped to create Sally Morgan’s identity, rather than a book being created
as a result of her Aboriginal past. I wonder whether Morgan would hold the
same views and identity if she had decided against writing a book of her
family history. She does, though, embark on a journey of self-discovery,
which can also shape a person’s identity further from what it already was.
"My Place" by Sally Morgan: an Analysis.
Essay by the-rebel-within, A, December 2005
download word file, 6 pages 4.2 1 reviews

Downloaded 98 times
KeywordsPopulation, hardships, Daisy, Shame, Arthur
0Like0

Sally Morgan's 'My Place' is an autobiographical account of three generations of


Aboriginals, which illustrate the social history of Aboriginals from the point of view
of an Aboriginal and marks its development as society evolves. Two aboriginals,
Gladys and Daisy Corruna, of the Stolen Generations describe the Paternalism which
led to their shame of being Aboriginal and forced them to hide the truth of their past
from their children. Paternalism also led to the creation of a new identity caused by
the loss of culture and heritage experienced by the Stolen Generation and the
unacceptance of the white population. Another of the Stolen Generation, Arthur
Corruna, tells of the hardships involved with being a half-caste and trying to get ahead
in life. The fourth, Sally Morgan, the author, describes what it was like to grow up
with a false sense of identity. She records the events in her life which signify the time
when she knew nothing of her heritage and was struggling to understand herself and
the different mannerisms of her family.

White society established their dominance over the indigenous people of Australia by
exercising social and political control such as the paternalism involved with
institutions. Half-caste children were sent to institutions in the hope that the 'white'
part of their blood would allow them to be trained and educated as white. These
children are often referred to as stolen, something of which Gladys, Sally's mother,
identifies with as she was taken from her family at the age of four, to live at the
Parkerville institution. "I always thought of myself as a stolen child," (pg. 246)
represents the animosity with which many half-caste children felt during their stay at
institutions like Parkerville. Gladys' mother Daisy was never institutionalized but was
taken into Perth under the pretext of becoming...

You might also like