Representation of Bandpass Signals
Representation of Bandpass Signals
Representation of Bandpass Signals
Let x t be a signal with Fourier Transform X f . We say that x t is narrowband about f c of bandwidth W if
fc W and
X f 0 f fc
W f fc
W
X f
f
fc W fc fc W fc W fc fc W
f
Let W
∞
W
xc t
∞ x t u 2 cos 2π fc t u gLP u du
and ∞
xs t x t u ! 2 sin 2π fc t u #" gLP u du
∞
Claim:
x t xc t 2 cos 2π fct $ xs t 2 sin 2π fct
Proof: We will show that the following system is an ideal bandpass filter
3-1
3-2 CHAPTER 3. REPRESENTATION OF BANDPASS SIGNALS
xc t
GLP
x t y t
xs t
GLP
Let the input to the system be an impulse at time τ. The output is then
∞
y t 2 cos 2π fct δ u τ cos 2π fc u gLP t u du
∞
∞
2 sin 2π fct δ u τ sin 2π fc u gLP t u du
∞
2gLP t τ cos 2π fct cos 2π fc τ 2gLP t τ sin 2π fct sin 2π fc τ
y t 2gLP t τ cos 2π fc t τ
Since the output at time t due to an impulse at time τ depends only on t τ the above system is time-invariant
with impulse response
h t 2gLP t cos 2π fct
The Fourier transform of the impulse response is
H f ∞
h t e j2π f t
dt
∞
or
W f fc W
0 elsewhere
1 fc W f fc W
1 fc W f fc W
0 elsewhere
So the above system is bandpass. Hence for signals which are narrowband we can write
x(t)
0
-2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
time
2
|X(f)|
0
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
frequency
2
Phase
-2
-4
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
frequency
Also
1
Xc f X f fc X f fc " GLP f
2
1
Xs f X f fc X f fc " GLP f
j 2
Below we illustrate this representation for a simple example. Figure 1.2 shows a signal that is bandlimited
to the frequency range 30-34Hz. The top figure is the time domain representation while the bottom two are the
magnitude and phase in the frequency domain. Figure 1.3 shows the signals after mixing with the sinusoids. It is
clear that there is a baseband term and a double frequency term. Figure 1.4 shows the signal after low pass filtering.
We now have a complex signal. Finally Figure 1.5 shows the reconstructed signal along with the envelope.
Now consider the signal
x̂ t xc t 2 sin 2π fct xs t 2 cos 2π fct
The spectrum of this signal is given by
1 1
X̂ f Xc f fc Xc f fc #" Xs f
fc Xs f fc "
j 2 2
1
X f 2 fc X f " GLP f fc X f X f 2 fc " GLP f fc
2j
1
X f X f 2 fc " GLP f fc X f 2 fc X f " GLP f fc
2j
1
X f GLP f fc X f GLP f fc
j
3-5
2 2
1 1
xc1(t)
xs1(t)
0 0
-1 -1
-2 -2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
time time
2 2
1.5 1.5
|Xc1(f)|
|Xs1(f)|
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 0
-100 -50 0 50 100 -100 -50 0 50 100
frequency frequency
1 1
0.5 0.5
xc(t)
xs(t)
0 0
-0.5 -0.5
-1 -1
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
time time
2 2
1.5 1.5
|Xc(f)|
|Xs(f)|
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 0
-100 -50 0 50 100 -100 -50 0 50 100
frequency frequency
1.5
0.5
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Essentially the signal x̂ has the negative frequencies multiplied by j (shifted by π 2) and the positive frequencies
multiplied by j (shifted by π 2). This is called the Hilbert transform of the original signal x.
Thus the above signal has only positive frequencies. The signal x̂ t is useful when considering single-sideband
systems.
3-7
X f
f
fc W fc fc W Xc f fc W fc fc W
f
W W
Xs f
W
W f
Figure 3.6: Alternative representation of lowpass equivalent signals using Hilbert transforms.
3-8 CHAPTER 3. REPRESENTATION OF BANDPASS SIGNALS
cos 2π fct
cos 2π fc t
xc t
HT
sin 2π fct
y t
x t
cos 2π fct
HT
xs t
sin 2π fct
sin 2π fct
3-9
∞
xc t x t u 2 cos 2π fc t u gLP u du
∞
∞
xs t x t u 2 sin 2π fc t u #" gLP u du
∞
x t xc t 2 cos 2π fc t xs t 2 sin 2π fct
xL t xc t jxs t
x t Re xL t 2e j2π fct "
xe t
x2c t
x2s t
xs t
θ t tan 1
xc t
x t xe t cos 2π fct θ t
Xc f X f fc X f fc #" GLP f
1
Xs f X f fc X f fc GLP f "
j
3-10 CHAPTER 3. REPRESENTATION OF BANDPASS SIGNALS
Sn f 0 f fc
W f fc
W
It is clear then that we can represent n t as
Let n t have zero mean and autocorrelation function (also covariance) Kn s t Kn t s .
We define the complex random processes z t and v t as
z t nc t jns t
and
Sz f GLP f 2 Sv f
Claim:
Sz f 4Sn f fc GLP f
Proof:
Kv s t E v s v t "
4e
E n s n t "
j2π f c s t
4e j2π fc s t Kn t s 4e j2π fc τ Kn τ
where τ t s.
The power spectral density of v t is
∞
Sv f Kv τ e j2π f τ
dτ
∞
∞
4 j2π f c τ
Kn τ e j2π f τ dτ
∞e
∞ j2π f fc τ
4
Kn τ e∞
dτ 4Sn f fc
Sz f 4Sn f fc GLP f 2
4Sn f fc GLP f
Note that Sz f 0 f
W .
3-11
Hence
∞
Kz τ 4Sn f fc GLP f e j2π f τ d f
∞
W
4Sn f fc e j2π f τ d f
W
Claim:
E z s z t "$ 0 s t
Proof:
∞ ∞
E z s z t #" E gLP s u1 v u1 du1
∞ ∞ gLP t u2 v u2 du2
∞ ∞
gLP s u1 gLP t u2 E v u1 v u2 " du1 du2
∞ ∞
gLP s u1 gLP t u2 E 4e jωc u1 u2 n u1 n u2 #" du1 du2
∞ ∞
∞ ∞
Now
So
2 ∞
E z t z s " ∞ Sn ω GLP ω ωc GLP ω ωc exp js ωc ω jt ωc ω dω
π
But GLP ω ωc GLP ω ωc 0 ω
Thus
E z s z t "$ 0 s t
Using the above result we can obtain relations between the correlation functions for n c t and ns t as follows.
Since the real and imaginary parts each must be zero we have that
Knc s t Kns s t
Knc ns s t
Kns nc s t
2Knc s t j 2Kns nc s t
1
Knc τ Re Kz τ #"
2
1
Kns τ Re Kz τ #"
2
1
Knc ns τ E nc t ns t τ #" Im Kz τ
2
Kns nc τ
Kns nc τ
1
S nc f F Re Kz f " "
2
1
F Kz τ Kz τ#"!"
4
1
Sz f Sz f #"
4
Sn f f c Sn f fc #" GLP f
Sn f fc Sn f fc " GLP f
1
S ns nc f F Im Kz f " "
2
Sn f f c Sn f fc #" GLP f
S nc ns f
S ns nc f
We showed that
E Z j" 0 j
E Z j Zk " δ jk λ j
Now if X t is a complex process determined from a narrowband process then E X s X t " 0 for all s t so that
b b
E Z j Zk " E X s ϕ j s ds X t ϕk t dt
a a
b b
ϕ j s ϕk t E X s X t " dsdt
a a
0 j k including j k
1. 3-13
fzk zk
1 x2k 2 λ2k 1 y2k 2 λ2k
e e
2π
λk
2 2π
λk
2
1 zk 2
e λk
πλk
To determine the joint density function we need to determine the correlations between the real and imaginary
parts of Zk and Zl . First observe the following identities.
If u uR juI and w wR jwI then
1
uR wR Re uw uw #"
2
and
1
uR wI Im uw uw "
2
Consider
1
E Re Zk " Re Zl " " ReE Zk Zl Zk Zl "
2
For k l both of these terms are zero. Now consider
1
E Re Zk " Im Zl "!" ImE Zk Zl Zk Zl "
2
For k l both terms on the right are zero as shown above while for k l the first term is zero and the second term
is purely real so the right hand side is zero. Thus we have independence among the Z’s.
If the original (bandpass) process is (essentially) white with power spectrum N0 2 then the complex (lowpass)
representation will be (essentially) white with power spectrum N0 . Thus in the K-L representation Zl will be
(complex) Gaussian with mean zero and E Zl 2 " N0 . (λl N0 ). If the process is (real) white noise then the K-L
representation will have E Zl 2 " N0 2
1. Problems
X1
1. Let X = X2 be jointly Gaussian with zero mean and covariance matrix
σ2 σ2
K σ2 σ2
Y1
Express X as WY where W is a 2 by 2 orthogonal matrix and Y = Y2 where Y1 , and Y2 are independent
Gaussian random variables.
3-14 CHAPTER 3. REPRESENTATION OF BANDPASS SIGNALS
2. Let X X1 jX2 , and Y X3 jX4 where X1 X2 X3 X4 is a jointly Gaussian random vector with mean 0
and covariance
1 0 0 1
K
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1 0 0 1
Show that X and Y are uncorrelated but not independent.
3. Show that K s t = min s t s t 0 is a nonnegative definite. (Hint: write min s t
Ix y 1 if y x and is 0 otherwise. Then interchange integrals)
∞
0 Is u It u du where
4. Prove P
M A
i 1 i
∑Mi 1 P Ai .
5. Let N1 Nn be independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian random variables with mean zero and
variance N0 2. Let N̂i Ni n. Show that for any ∆ 0
∑
n
lim P N̂i2 N0 2 ∆ 0
n ∞
i 1
6. Let H0 and H1 be two events. Let pi x1 xn be the conditional density of X1
Xn given Hi occurred.
(a) Assume that given Hi ,
X j nj 1 is a sequence of i.i.d. Gaussian random variables with mean 1 i E
and variance N0 2. Use the Chernoff bound to show that
P p1 X p0 X H0 e nE N 0
(b) Now let X1 Xn be independent discrete random variables taking values +1 and 1 with
P Xi 1 H0 p
P Xi 1 H0 1 p
P Xi 1 H1 p
P Xi 1 H1 1 p
P p1 X p0 X H0
e n ln
4p 1 p
(c) Again let X1 Xn be independent discrete random variables with Xi taking nonnegative integer values
only. Let
p0 x1 xn
i 1
λxi e λ0
∏ 0 xi !
n
xi 0 1 i n
and
n
λxi e λ1
p 1 x1 xn ∏ 1
i 1
xi !
If λ1 λ0 find the best Chernoff bound on
Pe 0
P p1 X p0 X H0
and
Pe 1
P p0 X p1 X H1
Let si be the optimal value of s for minimizing the bound to Pe i . Show s1
1 s0 .
1. 3-15
(d) Again let X1 X2n be independent discrete random variables with Xi taking nonnegative integer values
only. Let
x
p0 x1
n
x2n ∏ 1
i 1
λxi e λ1 2n λ0i e λ0
∏
xi ! i n 1 xi !
xi
0 1 i 2n
and
n λxi e λ0 2n λxi e λ1
p 1 x1 x2n ∏ 0
xi ! i ∏
1
i 1 n 1 xi !
If λ1 λ0 find the best Chernoff bound on
Pe 0
P p1 X p0 X H0
and
Pe 1 P p0 X p1 X H1
7. (a) Show that ∑∞ i 1 φi t φi s δ t s for any complete orthonormal set of functions φi t . ( Hint: Show
that the above function satisfies the definition of a delta function, that
∞
f t δ t s dt f s
∞
Also define eK s t as
∞
Kn s t
eK s t ∑
n 0 n!
Show that
∞
eK s t
∑ eλi φi s φi t
i 1
9. A bandpass signal x1 t Re xL 1 t e j2π f 1t " has center frequency f1 and bandwidth W1 f1 . It is desired
10. Show that the complex lowpass equivalent representation of a bandpass signal can be generated by
11. Consider a bandpass signal of the form x t xc t cos 2π fc t xs t sin 2π fct . It is desired to mix to
baseband to recover xc t and xs t . However, the local oscillators have a phase offset θ and so the local
signals are instead cos 2π f c t θ and sin 2π fc t θ . The signal is low pass filtered after mixing to baseband.
(a) Determine the signals out of the two low pass filters.
(b) If the phase is known to the receiver, determine how to recover the signals x c t and xs t from the filter
outputs.
12. (a) Simulate and compare to analysis the performance of QPSK modulation for E b N0 0 2 4 6 8 dB.
(b) Simulate the performance of QPSK modulation with a local oscillator with phase error θ 10 degrees
for Eb N0 0 2 4 6 8 dB. Can you analyze this system?
13. A bandpass signal is the input to a bandpass filter. The bandpass filter has impulse response as