11.1.

Subordinate Clause

• = characteristically functions as dependent within some larger

construction
 embedded into complex sentence

[1] i [The book she recommended] is out of print.

ii He [knows that she is right].
iii [Although the paper is poorly written,] it contains some
excellent ideas.

1
 11.1. Subordinate Clause
1.1 Marking of subordination
•

- subordination often marked by some feature in the

internal structure of clause

[2] i It is clear [that he made a mistake].

ii They interviewed all those [she mentioned _ in
her declaration]
iii She´s asking [how many copies we will want].
2
 11.1. Subordinate Clause
1.1 Marking of subordination

•[2] iii She´s asking [how many copies we will want].

- clause in brackets is subordinate
- marker:
- combination of prenuclear interrogative phrase
+
subject- predicator order
- corresponding main clause:
How many copies will we want?

3
• 1. Subordinate Clauses
1.1 Marking of subordination

- English does not require that subordination be

marked in structure of subordinate clause itself

[3] i He knows she is right.

ii She is right.  corresponding main clause

4
•
1. Subordinate Clauses
1.1 Marking of subordination

- clause can be marked as subordinate even though it

is not functioning as dependent within larger
construction

[4] He took advice from his daughter, who was

manager of the local bank.

5
 1. Subordinate Clauses
1.2 Finite and non- finite

• - major division is between finite and non-

finite subordinate clause:

[5] i He thinks that she is here. [finite]

ii He thinks that she be here.
iii She wants to be here. [non-
finite]

6
 1. Subordinate Clauses
1.3 Relative, comparative, and content clause
•
Three main classes of finite subordinate clause:
[6] i I couldn´t find the book that I wante d.
[relative]
ii He gave me more copies than I wanted.
[comparative]
iii You know that I wanted it.
[content]
7
 2. Clause Types

•- distinction between

(a) declarative content clause

(b) interrogative content clause
(c) exclamative content clause
8
 3. Subordinators in content
clause
3.1 Expanded declarative vs bare declaratives
•
- declarative content clauses prototypically
intorduced by subordinator that
- also without such a marker of subordination
[1] i He knows that you are here.
[expanded declarative]
ii He knows you are here.
[bare declarative]
9
 3. Subordinators in content clause
3.2 Non- expandable vs expandable declarative

certain prepositions take declarative complements that are invariably

bare (= non-expandable)

[2] a. I´ll do it if [you pay me].

b. I´ll do it provided [(that) you pay me].

10
 3. Subordinators in content
clause
• 3.3 Conditions under which that must or may
appear

(a) That is obligatory

- when content clause is subject or precedes matrix
predicator
[3] i [That they were lying] is now obvious.
ii But [that he really intended to cheat us] I still
can´t believe.
11
 3. Subordinators in content
clause
3.3 Conditions under which that must or may
• appear

(a) That is obligatory

- when content clause is adjunct

[4] He appealed to us to bring his case to the attention of

the authorities that justice might be done.
12
 3. Subordinators in content
clause
• 3.3 Conditions under which that must or may
appear

(a) That is obligatory

- when content clause is complement of comparative
than/ as
[5] I´d rather (that) he hired a taxi [than that he drove
my car]
13
 3. Subordinators in content
clause
3.3 Conditions under which that must or may
• appear

(b) That must be omitted

- when the content clause is embedded within
unbounded dependency construction in a
way that subject is realised by gap
[6]i Who does she think [_ is Santa Claus]?
ii Bernhard is the one she thinks [_ is Santa Claus].
14
 3. Subordinators in content clause
that as subordination marker

 According to H&P (2002), that is not the head of the clause. It is just
a syntactic marker of subordination
− it is frequently omissible and thus rather a dependent element
of the clause, i.e. not a head
− the mood of the dependent clause depends on the matrix
predicate, not on the subordinator
– We insist [that the work be finished this week]
– *We hope [that the work be finished this week]
− adjunct clauses may precede the that-clause
– The boat was such an attraction that I was afraid, [ [if he came near
it again], that I should never see the last of him]

WD 09/10 15
 3. Subordinators in content clause
wether and if

 Like that whether and its variant if are markers for subordination
 whether is not omissible
 Content clause types behave differently w.r.t. subordination
markers
 declarative
– omissible that
 closed interrogative
– obligatory whether/if
 open interrogative
– without any subordinator but with a wh-phrase in the pre-nuclear
position

WD 09/10 16
Functions of declarative content
clauses
Simone Trost & Marthe Wiesner

WD 09/10 17
 4.0 Definition of content clause

 Content clauses
the default category of finite subordinate clauses, they lack the
special properties of relative and comparative clauses, their
structure is less different from the main clauses.
 subordinate clause
a clause embedded as a dependent (complement or modifier) in a
larger clause
I think she said [he was ill]
 main clause
a clause not embedded as a dependent in a larger clause
[It is raining]
 matrix clause
a clause within which a subordinate clause is embedded
[I think she said [he was ill]]

WD 09/10 18
 4.0 Definition of content clause

 3 major subclasses of subordinate clause

 relative clause
they weren´t among [NP the people [who had been
invited]]
 comparative clause
More people came [PP than [ _had been invited]]
 content clause
provides content, implied by, or commented upon by it´s
main clause
I don´t think [that these people had been invited]
• declarative content clause (that-clause)
• interrogative content clause

WD 09/10 19
 4.0 Definition of content clause

 grammatical roles of declarative content clauses

 external complement of verbs or adjectives (subject)
It annoys me [CPthat she does it] extraposition
It is obvious [CPthat she does it ]
 internal complements of verbs
He told her [CP(that) she was smart]
 internal complements of adjectives
I am not sure [CP (that) he was right ]
 complements of nouns
…[the [NP idea] [CP that a son would do such a thing to his father ]]
 complements of prepositions or adverb
They left [PP [P before] [CP the meeting ended ]]
We discussed [PP [P about] [CP that he sould pass the examen ]]

WD 09/10 20
 4.0 Definition of content clause

 the subordinator that

 obligatory
• if the content clause in the left periphery
[That I need help] is obvious.
*I need help is obvious.
• if the head is a noun
 inadmissible:
with particular prepositions
I left [before [he arrived]]
*I left before that he arrived.
 optional
with particular verbs and adjectives
I know [that it´s genuine]
I know [it´s genuine]

WD 09/10 21
 4.1 Declarative content clause as subject

 Subject
 The prototypical subject is an NP
 All verbs allow an NP as subject
[NP Their failure to reply] doesn´t worry her.
 Content clauses do not have the same properties as
subjects, but they occupy the position before the verb,
therefore their analysis as a subject is unproblematic
[CP That he tried to retract his statement ] is hardly surprising
surprise x p
DO S
It is hardly surprising [CP that he tried to retract his statement] extrapostion
Even more surprising is [CP that he tried to retract his statement] postposition

WD 09/10 22
 4.1 Declarative content clause as subject

 predicates licensing subject declarative content

clauses
 adjectives
[CP That he tried to retract his statement ] is hardly surprising
true, clear, obvious, important, striking …
true p
S
 nouns
[CP That he tried to retract his statement ] is a miracle
an accident, a measure of, a miracle, the result. …
miracle p
 verbs

WD 09/10 23
 4.1 Declarative content clause as subject

 verbs
• intransitive
matter, offend, …
matter p
S
• transitive
amuse, bother, disgust, help, show, suggest, surprise
surprise x p
DO S

WD 09/10 24
 4.2 Declarative content clause as internal complement

 declarative content clause as internal complement

 It is contained within the matrix VP
 2-place predicates
Everyone [VP expected [CP that he would resign]]
expect p x
IC S IC: internal complement
accept, add, forget, presume, suspect, guess, threaten, feel,
consider , …
 3-place predicates
They [VP told us [CP that the battery was flat ]]
tell p y x
IC DO S

WD 09/10 25
 4.2 Declarative content clause as internal complement

 3-place predicates
• NP as first internal complement
They [VP told [NP us] [CP that the battery was flat ]]
tell p y x
IC NP S
obligatory y: assure, convince, inform, persuade, reassure, remind,…
optional y: advise, caution, show, ?ask, ?order, …
• optional PP as first internal complement
• She [VP suggested [PP to me ] [CP that she was ill]]
suggest p y x
IC PP S
i. y is recipient (to): admit, announce, reply, suggest, prove, …
ii. y is source (from):conclude, discover, elicit, see, learn, …
iii. y is ? (with): agree, arrange, confirm, organise, plead, …

WD 09/10 26
 4.2 Declarative content clause as internal complement

As complement to the verb be (cleft-

constructions)
The reason he resigned [VP was [CP that he didn´t get on with the
boss]]
The problem [VP is [CP he can´t afford the rent ]]
− The content clause identifies the value of the variable
expressed in the subject.
− Although the subject contains the definite article there is no
reference to any previously mentioned problem. The effect
is to present the content clause as new information.

WD 09/10 27
 4.3 Content clause in constructions with it
subject it

 It as subject
 it as correlate of an extraposed subject (expletive it)
It is hardly surprising [CP that he tried to retract his statement]
[CPThat he tried to retract his statement] is hardly surprising
surprising x
S
true, clear, obvious, important, striking …
matter, offend, …
amuse, bother, disgust, help, show, suggest, surprise

WD 09/10 28
 4.3 Content clause in constructions with it
subject it

 it in impersonal constructions (impersonal it)

It appeared [CPthat he was trying to hide his true identity]
appear p
IC
Apparently he was trying to hide his true identity
− the subject is semantically empty
− The content clause represents the sole argument of the matrix clause
− The content clause is an internal complement of the verb
− The subordinate clause can not occupy the actual subject position
− seem, appear, ?happen, ….

WD 09/10 29
 4.3 Content clause in constructions with it
subject it

 Difference expletive it vs. impersonal it

 subject function
o impersonal construction
the content clause is only an internal argument, i.e. it cannot
be a subject
It seems that he was wrong.
*That he was wrong seems.
Peter seems to be wrong
o expletive construction
the content clause is the subject since it licensed by the verb
in this position
It is obvious that he was wrong
That he was wrong is obvious.

WD 09/10 30
 4.3 Content clause in constructions with it
subject it
 Impersonal constructions with adjectival predicatives
It seems that he was wrong.
*That he was wrong seems.
seem p
IC
It seems clear that he was guilty.
It seems [AP clear [CP that he was guilty]] expletive it
[CP That he was guilty]i seems clear _i CP in subject position
− The that-clause can function as a subject if a
predicative complement is added. Then we have an
ordinary complex intransative construction
His guilt seems clear.
seem P x WD 09/10 31
 4.3 Content clause in constructions with it
subject it

 Complementation with as if
With seem and appear the content clause as
impersonal construction can be replaced without
any change of meaning by as if.
It seemed that/as if he was trying to hide his true
identity.
− But as if-phrases cannot function as subject

WD 09/10 32
 4.3 Content clause in constructions with it
subject it

 With be
There are several idiomatic uses of be with it as
subject and content clause as internal
complement:
It is not that I don´t understand what you are
trying to say.

− The it has no clear reference and can hardly be

regarded as defining a variable whose value is specified
by the content clause.

WD 09/10 33
 4.3 Content clause in construction with it
complex-transitive construction

 complex-transitive construction
I [regard [it [PP as a discourtesy]]] [CP that you didn´t notify them]
I [find [it [PPhardly surprising]]] [CPthat he tried to sing]
P IC PC extraposition
find P p x
PC IC S
− The that-clause is the predicand of the predicative complement (PC).If the
predicand is a content clause, we normally need it as dummy object
(expletive object it), with the content clause in extraposed object position.
accept (as), believe, call, confirm (as), consider, declare, recognise, …

WD 09/10 34
 4.3 Content clause in construction with it
other constructions

 I take it you´ll be accepting their offer.

take it is a verbal idiom which as a whole licenses the content clause
 He didn´t like it that she had brought the children
like doesn´t license a content clause on ist own, it has to be added
 She resents it that they appointed someone less qualified than her.
here: it could be omitted
 You can depend on it that she will find a solution.
it is object of on rather than of the verb, it is obligatory
 We owe it to you that we got off so lightly.
 The content clause can be preposed with omission of it
 This brought it home to us that we were in great danger.
it can be dropped without change in position of the content clause.

WD 09/10 35
 complement of an adjective
He’s [AP very conscious [CP that they like him]]
afraid, angry, aware, certain, confident, conscious, eager, fearful, glad,
grateful…
participle adjectives
amazed, amused, annoyed, determined, disgusted…
afraid p x
IC S
− IC is oblique, either [PP P [NP]] or [PP P [CP]]
− There is a sense of afraid that is found only with a clausal complement
– approximately “regret”:
I’m afraid I can’t help you.
afraid p x
IC S
− IC is core complement
WD 09/10 36
 multiple argument structures

 Max is [AP certain [CP that he is being victimised]]

certain p x
IC S

 It is [AP certain] [CP that he is being victimised ]]

[CP that he is being victimised] is [AP certain]

certain p
S

WD 09/10 37
 Complements of a noun or supplement
 complement of a noun
[NP The thought [CP that we might need him]] is awful
thought p x
IC
We’re looking for [NP evidence [CPthat he was the offender]]
i. nouns derived from verbs: admission, agreement, argument,
assertion, assumption, belief, claim, proof, hope…
ii. nouns derived from adjectives: awareness, certainty, confidence,
possibility, probability, sorrow, likelihood
iii. derivative nouns which differ in meaning from the source:
awareness, certainty, confidence, possibility, probability, sorrow,
likelihood, ...

WD 09/10 38
 subject of the source commonly appears as a
 genitive determiner
[NP [NP Frank's] assumption [CP that he was not ill]]
assume p x
IC S
assumption p x z
IC NPGEN
 as a by/of-Phrase (if the source is an agentive verb)
[NP a proposal [PPby them] [CPthat he should leave]]
propose p x
IC S
assumption p x z
IC PP[by/of]

WD 09/10 39
 genitive determiners with nouns derived from adjectives
 the content clause is an internal complement of the adjective
[NP [NPhis ] confidence [CPthat he would get the job]]
confident p x
IC S
confidence p x z
IC NPGEN
awareness, certainty, eagerness, ....
 inadmissible genitive
the/*his probability that he would get the job
probable p
S
*likelihood, *possibility, …

WD 09/10 40
 the fact that
− most frequent noun taking a content clause complement
− it serves as a device for nominalising clauses by incorporating them
into an NP that can occupy any ordinary NP position

This theory is borne out [PP by [NP the fact [CP that children in co-
educational schools often mature earlier than those who are
segregated]]]]

− The preposition by allows NP complements but not declarative

content clauses: use of the fact here is therefore necessary to
accommodate the content clause within a by phrase

WD 09/10 41
 verbs and adjectives that do not license content clauses
indifferent, disguise, …
Are they [AP indifferent [PP to [DP the [NP fact [CP that the dog can
easily pick up germs from the preceding patient]]]]]?
No amount of statistical explanation can [VP disguise [DP the [NP fact
[CP that, as a nation, we are still spending more than we are
earning]]]]

− indifferent and disguise don’t license content clauses:

indifferent requires a to-phrase, disguise requires an NP-object

WD 09/10 42
 the fact that in subject position
the fact is not limited to cases where the content clause could
not stand on its own, it commonly occurs in subject position,
where it is in competition with two other constructions:

 NP as subject
[NPThe fact that it was illegal] didn’t worry him.
 clause as subject
[CPThat it was illegal] didn’t worry him
 extraposition
It didn’t worry him [CPthat it was illegal ]

WD 09/10 43
• attributive adjuncts
We should encourage the leaders of these societies to accept
[NP the [AP unpleasant] [NP fact [CP that they are responsible for
their fates]]]].
− NPs with the fact as head and clause as
complement are always definite: the clause
identifies the fact

WD 09/10 44
 Postposed complements and supplements
 postposition
The [NP possibility _ ] can’t be ruled out [CP that she will call an early
election]

 supplement
I’m inclined to favour your first suggestion, [CP that we shelve the
proposal until after the election ]
Avoiding one counsel of the Fabian tract, [CP that a few of the larger
school boards might well be saved for limited purposes because of the
superior efficiency, the government came out for their abolition ].

− The supplements have the whole of the preceding NP as anchor, they

must be semantically compatible with it (identifying its content)

WD 09/10 45
Multi-word licensing
There are some instances of the sequence noun + content
clause where the clause is not licensed by the noun alone
• The clearest cases involve prepositional constructions
like: to the effect, on the basis…
• Certain constructions involving have/give or existential
there + be are also of this kind:
i. We had no idea it would be so difficult
ii. The present system has the disadvantage that it is
inordinately complicated.
iii. There’s also the problem that two signatures are
needed.

WD 09/10 46
 idea
We had [NP no idea [CP it would be so difficult]]
[NP The idea [CPthat he might be wrong]] had simply never occurred
to him.
− idea can certainly take a clausal complement

 the have no/any idea combinations can license an interrogative

complement, which is certainly not possible with idea on its
own:
He had no idea what to do.
*A good idea what to do was suggested by Terry.
− Have no idea is semantically like not know, it appears to behave
as in idiom with the same complementation as know

WD 09/10 47
 Disadvantage and problem
 The present system has the disadvantage that it is inordinately
complicated.
 There’s also the problem that two signatures are needed.
− both are hardly to take clausal complements on their own:
?The disadvantage that it is inordinately complicated had been
overlooked.
?The problem that two signatures are needed is quite serious.

− therefore, it is arguable that the content clause is a complement

in the structure of the VP or clause rather than of the NPs
headed by these nouns

WD 09/10 48
 Delayed complements with so and such
the adverb so and the adjective such license declarative content clauses
occurring at the end of the matrix clause:
i. The case was so heavy that I couldn’t lift it.
ii. So many people enrolled for the course that we had to move to a
larger room.
iii. It was such a miserable day that we decided to stay at home.
− The content clause here is not adjacent to the so or such that
licenses it, but is delayed to the end of the matrix clause
− This position is obligatory
*It was so that I couldn’t lift it heavy
nor can we have a content clause at the end of the subject phrase
*So many people that we had to move to a larger room enrolled for
the course.

WD 09/10 49
 Such and so indicate degree/extent or manner and the content
clause has a resultative meaning 'The result of the case being as
heavy as it was was that I couldn’t lift it'
 So occurs as modifier to a wide range of heads: adjective,
degree determinative, adverb, verb
i. The case was so heavy that I couldn’t lift it. (adjective)
ii. So many people enrolled for the course that we had to move to
a larger room. (degree determinative)
iii. It happened so quickly that we were taken completely offguard.
(adverb)
iv. He’d so arranged the programme, that we had lots of time to
discuss the papers. (verb)

WD 09/10 50
  such is predeterminer modifier in NP structure,
but it can also occur predicatively
i. It was such a miserable day that we decided to
stay at home. (predeterminer modifier)

 The subordinator that is omissible, under the condition that

apply to content clauses generally
The case was so heavy I couldn’t lift it.

WD 09/10 51
 such that
When the adjective such is used predicatively the content clause
generally follows immediately, but it does not have to:
i. His circumstances were such that he could rarely
afford a restaurant meal.
ii. [Such _] is the mystique of planning [that people
expect that fulfilment of the plan will follow
automatically upon its announcement].

− such is preposed
− the content clause is again located at the end of the
matrix clause
− in this predicative construction the subordinator that
is not omissible

WD 09/10 52
• so occurs immediately before the content clause
it licenses in three constructions; involving
manner, result, and purpose adjuncts
 Manner
i. He’d arranged the programme so that we had lots of
time to discuss the papers.
ii. I apply the hay so that only the tops of the plants
show above it.
− The so here can be glossed as “in such a way”: it is a
manner adjunct and licenses a resultative “with the
result that” reading
WD 09/10 53
• Result
Most primary teachers are women [PP so [that suitable ‘role
models’, to use the trendy phrase, are more abundant for girls than
for boys]]

− So is syntactically inseparable from the content clause

which, moreover, cannot be omitted
− The content clause is best analysed as a complement
of so, with the combination of so + content clause
functioning as adjunct of result
− The resultative meaning is attributable not to the
content clause itself, but to the phrase consisting of so
as head and clause as complement.This phrase we
take to be a PP, with so a preposition with the
content clause as complement

WD 09/10 54
• Purpose

I disconnected the phone [PP so [that we could talk

undisturbed]]
− The PP consisting of so + content clause functions as adjunct
of purpose, with so equivalent to in order

[PP so [that his customers should not soil their hands]] Brecht
issued white gloves _
− preposing of the content clause

WD 09/10 55
 Adjunct in clause structure
The declarative content clause functions as adjunct rather than complement
 With subject + predicator order
What has happened [CP that you are looking so worried]
− adjunct to interrogative clauses
− semantically the adjunct can be regarded as resultative: the
presupposition of the question can be glossed as “Something has
happened with the result that you are looking worried”.
This is my party card’, he said, holding it high [CP that all might see it ]
− purpose adjunct; constructions is rare in Present-day English usually
having so that rather than that alone
[CP The more we talked ] the more I liked her.
− the more we talked is the subordinate clause in the correlative
comparative construction
− The initial element is always a comparative phrase modified by the

WD 09/10 56
 Adjuncts with subject-auxiliary inversion
[CP Had they committed a similar crime] they would have got a jail sentence.
− conditional adjunct, equivalent to the PP if they had committed a similar crime
here
− Only a subset of auxiliaries can occur in this constructions: the great majority
of cases involve had, were, or should
− The subordinate clause has the appearance of a main clause closed
interrogative. This is one reflection of the significant semantic resemblances
between conditions and questions. Compare:
i. If your’re free this afternoon, we can go and look at some houses.
ii. Are you free this afternoon? If so, we can go ...
so is interpreted in terms of the positive answer preceding questions, for the
negative answer we have not
If not, I’ll look at the houses on my own
inversion can serve as a marker of a conditional

WD 09/10 57
 Complement of a preposition or adverb
 prepositional governors
 non-expandable content clauses
exclude that
i. They left [PP before [CP the meeting ended]
ii. We’ll invite them [PP though [CPI don’t think he’ll come]]
after, although, as, as if, if, in case, until, unless, when
where, whereas, ...
 expandable
allow that
i. I’ll come along [PP [Pprovided] (that) I can leave early]
ii. I was lucky (in that the other candidates withdrew).
but, considering, exept, given, granted, in, nitwiehstanding, now,
provided, providing, save seeing, so, supposing

WD 09/10 58
 non-expandable construction
the main prepositions/prepositional idioms: after, although, as, as
if, as long as, as soon as, because, before, for, for all, if, in case, lest,
like, once, since, though, till/until, unless, when, where, whereas,
adverbs: directly, immediately
 expandable construction
the main prepositions/prepositional idioms: but, considering,
except, given, granted, in, notwithstanding, now, provided,
providing, save, seeing, so, supposing, in order, on condition, for
fear,
 that is obligatory with in, and effectively with so too, for so
without that is construed as a connective adverb
 But occurs with a content clause complement in such
constructions as:

WD 09/10 59
i. I don’t doubt [PP but [CP that she meant it]]
− doubt in non-affirmative contexts
− but is omissible, with the content clause then a complement of
doubt
ii. I wouldn’t have taken any notice [PP but [CP that I feared they might
upset Angela]]
− that is more or less obligatory
− for without it but will generally be taken as a coordinator
iii. There wasn’t [a boy]i among them [PP but [CP _i would have gladly
taken my place]]
− CP has a gap in subject position (anaphorically linked to a boy
among them), with that obligatory omitted
− archaic construction, restricted to non-affirmative contexts;
− the “except” meaning of but gives an interpretation like that of an
negative relative clause: “There wasn’t a boy among them who
would not gladly have taken my place”.

WD 09/10 60
 61

so/such [33]
adverb [43]
selected
[42]
un-

adjunct
PP
preposition
complement of
content clause (cc)

by a head
selected
subordinate clause

[4]
PP

noun [22]
Summary

clause

adjective [20]

S, O

WD 09/10
verb [4]
adjunct [40]
supplement [29]
relative [3]
-cc
comparative [3]
exclamative
main clause
imperative
interrrogative
declarative
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Classification of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives

 Classification of constructions containing subordinate

interrogatives

INFORMATION DIRECTION

POLAR I don’t know whether to

I don’t know if it is possible
(CLOSED) tell them

ALTERNATIVE I don’t know if it is possible I don’t know whether to

(CLOSED) or not go or not

VARIABLE
I don’t know what he wants I don’t know what to do
(OPEN)

WD 09/10 62
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Licensing

 Licensing verbs
i. Asking: ask, inquire, wonder, investigate, …
ii. Knowing: know, find out, remember, certain, …
iii. Guessing: guess, estimate, predict, judge, …
iv. Telling: tell, inform, point out, show
v. Deciding: decide, determine, make up one’s mind, agree, …
vi. Dependence: depend, ha a bearing, influence, affect, …
vii. Significance significant, important, matter, care, …
viii. Concerning concern, about, as to, regarding, …
ix. Surprise amaze, amazed, amazing, surprise, …
[open type only]
x. Disbelief doubt, doubtful, question, questionable
[closed only]

WD 09/10 63
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 Complements
 Word type of licensers
 Verb p, …
bother, know, inform, …
 Adj p, …
important, relevant, …
 Noun p, …
matter, problem, …
 Prep p
• The PP is licensed by a matrix predicate, i.e. the content clause is
an indirect complement of the matrix predicate
agree on, aware of, debate as to, knowledge of, …
• The PP is free
as to, regard less, irrespective of, …

WD 09/10 72
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 interrogative subject clause

[Whether we do it now or later] is immaterial
Iti is immaterial [whether we do it now or later] extraposition
 Verb p
bother, concern, interest, matter, worry, …
 Adj p
arguable, certain, clear, crucial, debatable, immaterial, …
 Noun p
concern, issue, matter, problem, question, secret, …
 Verb q, p
affect, bear (on), depend, determine, influence,
[p Whether we win ] depends on [q how much effort we put in ]

WD 09/10 73
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 predicative complement
The main question is [whether we have the test tomorrow]
− The question is identified by the predicative interrogative
The main question is: [Do we have the test tomorrow]
− The question is identified by the root interrogative which cites it.
 DO of a complex-transitive construction
Verb P, p, x
I | consider | [how he cheated us] | [P very important]
S P IC (interrogative) PC (IC: internal complement)
− The clausal IC may intervene between the matrix verb and the
predicative complement
*He | considered | that he cheated us | very offending
I | consider | it |very important |[how he cheated us] extraposition

WD 09/10 74
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 internal complement (DO)

 verb p, x
We investigated [whether the contract is valid]
We investigated [what caused the malfunction]
*We investigated that the contract is valid
*that: ask, concern, inquire, investigate, ponder, wonder, …
We discovered [what caused the malfunction]
We discovered that the lack of gas caused the malfunction
that: care, check, consider, decide, guess, know, mind, recall, think, …
 verb p, y, x
*that: ask, …
that: inform, show, tell, …

WD 09/10 75
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 complement of a preposition
 the interrogative complement is selected
by a prepositional verb
He is preoccupied [PP with [whether people find him socially acceptable]]
depend on, agree about, congratulate …
 by a prepositional adjective
certain about, anxious about, …
 by a prepositional noun
debate as to, argument over, …
 by a preposition (i.e. it is not a complement of the matrix verb)
regardless of, irrespective of, …
[PPAs for/to [what should be done next]], I think your own proposal is best
They were divided in their beliefs [PP as to [whether the diet was
effective]]

WD 09/10 76
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 prepositional verbs
 optional prepositions
They asked [PP about [what changes they were planning]]
− gives the topic of the question
They asked [what changes they were planning]
− reports the content
ask (about) p, x
IC C IC = (internal) complement
i. DO S DO = direct object
ii. A S A = adjunct, here oblique
 obligatory prepositions
They were wrangling [PP over [ who should be secretary]]

WD 09/10 77
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 complements of adjectives
There are no two-place adjectives that take interrogatives as core
complements but not as obliques (cf. consider that only licenses core
complements)
 optional prepositions
He is anxious [whether he should accept their offer or not ]
He is anxious [PP about [ whether he should accept their offer or not ]]
aware about/of, careful about, certain about/of, sure about/of
 obligatory prepositions
interested in, dependent on, indicative of, …

WD 09/10 78
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 complements of nouns
 optional prepositions
The minister has to solve the question [whether or not he is guilty]
This brings us to the question [PP of [whether or not he is guilty]]
question (of), decision (as to), test (of), …
 obligatory prepositions
argument over, belief as to, controversy over, debate as to, discussion
of, opinion on, …

WD 09/10 79
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Complements

 interrogatives as supplements
 the anchor is often a noun
Ch. 19 discusses the converse question, [whether aboriginal
customary laws should themselves be imported into the general
legal system in some way]
The question might be asked: [Isn't the management aware of
these facts?]
− The interrogative is a main clause if it is not adjacent to its
anchor
 the anchor does not license the interrogative
Their quarrels were always about the same thing – [whether she
should give up her job and get married]

WD 09/10 80
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Question orientation vs answer orientation

 Question orientation vs answer orientation

QUESTION ORIENATION ANSWER ORIENTATION

She asked me She told me report of an

where he lived were he lived illocutionary act

report of the
She wanted to know She knew
subject’s attitude
where he lived where he lived
towards a statement

WD 09/10 81
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Question orientation vs answer orientation

 emotive modifiers
QUESTION ORIENATION ANSWER ORIENTATION

Tell me *I recall
how on earth you saved her how on earth you saved her

I wonder *I see
who ever would do that who ever would do that

 Emotive modifiers are restricted to contexts with question

orientation

WD 09/10 82
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Restrictions on closed interrogatives

 Restrictions on closed interrogatives

There are contexts where open interrogatives are admissible but where
closed interrogatives are at least questionable
 question orientation
Did she say if the door was locked?
 weak answer-orientation
?She said if the door was locked

 strong answer orientation

*It's amazing whether he wrote it.
*He realised if she meant you
 open interrogative
It's amazing what he wrote
He realised who she meant

WD 09/10 83
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Subject-auxiliary inversion

 SAI in subordinate interrogatives

It occurs in some varieties of English (quite widespread in the USA)
She asked what had she done wrong SAI
She asked what she had done wrong
He wanted to know was she ill SAI
He wanted to know if she was ill
− strong question-orientation (emotive modifiers are possible)
− reported speech
*He didn't know was she ill. SAI
He didn't know if she was ill
− weak question-orientation/answer orientation (emotive
modifiers are impossible)

WD 09/10 84
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Dubitatives

 Dubitatives
 They only allow closed interrogatives but not open ones
I doubt whether he wrote it
*I doubt who wrote it
*I doubt whether he wrote it or not
*I doubt whether they'll appoint a man or a woman
− Semantically the interrogative corresponds to a declarative
I doubt that he wrote it

WD 09/10 85
5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
Dubitatives

 doubt
i. F doubts that M wrote it
F doubts that M wrote it or F doubts that M didn't write it
ii. F doubts whether M wrote it
F doubts whether M wrote it or F doubts whether M
didn't write it
− The conjunct is selected that contains the statement F is
inclined not to believe
*F doubts that M wrote it but F doubts that M didn't write it
too
− i. and ii. seem to be equivalent, i.e. the interrogative in ii. is
rather a declarative (syntax-semantic mismatch)
iii. F doesn't doubt that M wrote it
iv. *F doesn't doubt whether M wrote it

WD 09/10 86
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
attributive complex clauses

 attributive complex clauses

a. He made I don't know how many mistakes
b. He made some mistakes, and I don't know how many

proposals for an analysis:

i. He made [DP many mistakes]
ii. He made [DP [CP I don't know [CP [ how many mistakes]i he made _i] ]
mistakes ]
iii. He made [DP [CP I don't know [CP [ how many mistakes]i he made _i] ]
mistakes ]

b. He made some mistakes and I don't know [CP [how many mistakes]i he
made _i]

WD 09/10 87
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
infinitival interrogatives

 Infinitival interrogatives
i. I was considering [whether to get my jacket from the car]
I was considering [whether I should get my jacket from the
car]
ii. Frequently readers request advice on [how to establish a good
lawn]
Frequently readers request advice on [how they can establish
a good lawn]

verb classes: know, ask, tell, decide, concern (cf. slide 2)

WD 09/10 88
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
conditionals

 interrogatives as adjunct: the exhaustive conditional

construction
 ungoverned
i. You got paid [CP whether business was good or bad]
 governed
ii. You got paid [AdjP regardless [PP of [CP whether business was
good or bad] ]]
iii. You got paid [AdjP no matter [CP whether business was good or
bad ] ]]
− without preposition
− I and ii do not differ in meaning

WD 09/10 89
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
conditionals

 meaning of the exhaustive conditional construction

i. You got paid [CP whether business was good or bad]
whether business was good or bad ⇔
[business was good] or [business was not good]
− Each conjunct (answer to the question) defines a case.
− The conjuncts form an exhaustive set of possibilities
− I is true in either of these cases
ii. You got paid if business was good and (you got paid) if
business was bad

WD 09/10 90
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
conditionals

 Open and closed exhaustive conditionals

 open
I'm going with them, [CP whatever the consequences may be]
 closed
I'm going with them [CP whether you like it or not]

WD 09/10 91
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
conditionals

 open interrogative construction

They require interrogative words in –ever in the ungoverned version

UNGOVERNED GOVERNED

*[Who we recommend], they will [Regardless of who we recommend],

appoint Jones. they will appoint Jones

[Whoever we recommend], they will *[Regardless of whoever we

appoint Jones. recommend], they will appoint Jones

− They will appoint Jones given any value in the open question 'the appoint x'
− -ever has a free choice meaning (is likewise found in fused relatives)

WD 09/10 92
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
conditionals

• open interrogatives compared with fused relatives

 open interrogative
They will appoint Jones, [CP whoever we recommend]
With whoever he works, we will agree
− The preposition may precede the wh-element
− They do not allow emotive modifiers
 fused relative
They will appoint whoever we recommend
They will [VP appoint [NP _i [CP whoeveri we recommend]]]
He always antagonised [NP _i [CP whoever he worked with]]
*He always antagonised [NP _i [CP with whoever he worked ]]
− The preposition must not precede the wh-element
− They allow emotive modifiers

WD 09/10 93
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
conditionals

 closed interrogative construction

Both alternatives
i. You got paid [CP whether business was good or bad]
whether business was good or bad ⇔
[business was good] or [business was bad]
ii. You got paid [CP whether business was good or not]
[business was good] or [business was not good]
− The conjuncts form an exhaustive set of possibilities
− Both conjuncts have to be expressed, i.e. polar questions
are not allowed as exhaustive conditionals

WD 09/10 94
 5. 3 Survey of constructions containing subordinate interrogatives
conditionals

 reduced forms
i. Whether (we are) hunting or being hunted, the fox is renowned for
its cunning
ii. Whether (it has been) taken neat or with water, the mixture can be
quite lethal.
iii. Whether (it is) historically a fact or not, the legend has a certain
symbolic value.
iv. The UN may not interfere in the political affairs of any nation,
whether (it is) to unify it, federalise it, or balkanise it.
v. Whatever their faults (may be), they are not hypocrites.
vi. However well-meaning (it is), the vary act of helping old people may
reduce their ability to look after themselves.

WD 09/10 95
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 Subjunctive construction and specialised uses of modal auxiliaries

The subjunctive is marked by the plain form of the verb.
i. mandative
We insisted that they wear stockings. (tense backshifing)
ii. complement of preposition
Nothing in English has been ridiculed as much as the ambiguous use of
words, unless it be the ambiguous use of sentences
iii. exhaustive conditional interrogative
Our thanks are due to all our staff, whether they be in the offices, the
warehouses, or the branches, for their help during this difficult time
− The subjunctive is not obligatory
− Alternatives are the indicative and the specialised-modal construction
We insist that she should be kept informed
We insist that they be kept informed

WD 09/10 96
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 mandative construction
i. subjunctive mandative
They demand(ed) that the park remain open
ii. should-mandative
They demand(ed) that the park should remain open
iii. covert mandative
They demand(ed) that the park should remain open
They demand(ed) that the park remained open
− The mandative meaning derives entirely by the governing verb.
 predicates with obligatory mandatory interpretation:
require, stipulate, essential, necessary, …
 predicates with optional mandatory interpretation:
insist, suggest, important, …

WD 09/10 97
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 semantic contrast between mandatives and non-mandatives

mandative
i. She insisted [that he tell her the whole story]
ii. I suggest [you go and see a doctor]
iii. It's important [that he should take us into his confidence]
− The situation expressed in the content clause is a matter of bringing
about (She insisted on compliance)
non-mandative
i. She insisted that he told her the whole story
ii. I suggest [she doesn't like us very much]
iii. It's not important [that the gift won't be a surprise]
− The situation expressed in the content clause is a matter of truth.

WD 09/10 98
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 Mandatives and modality

• dimensions of modality
STRENGTH

WEAK MEDIUM STRONG

mandatives
You (may) leave You (ought) You (must) leave
at noon leave at noon at noon
DEONTIC
advise, insist,
?permit, *let
recommend, necessary, …
KIND

He may have He ? have

He must have
EPISTEMIC missed the missed the
missed the train
train train

WD 09/10 99
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 Content clauses governed by prepositions

 Adversatives
He was bathed in perspiration, trembling [PP lest [his authorship become
known]]
lest (no expanded form with that), for fear
 Conditionals
He struggles in vain against the proposition that [PP if [ the mind be
immaterial,] its functions ought to be unaffected by the condition of the body.
if , in case, though, unless (all with no expanded form with that), on condition,
provided, providing
 Purposives
Extraordinary precautions were taken [PP so that no stranger be allowed in the
city]
so, in order

WD 09/10 100
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 Content clauses functioning as exhaustive conditional

adjunct
i. It meets with continuing hostility from those who see
themselves as fostering and guarding serious art, [whether it
be in the theatre, in fiction, or on television]
ii. Achieving the optimum blast design for a particular rock mass
type, [be it in mining or quarrying,] can be an expensive and
time-consuming procedure.
iii. They realize that East-West friction, [wherever it take place
around the globe], is in essence the general conflict between
two entirely different societies.

WD 09/10 101
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 Other modal constructions

 attitudinal should
expresses subjunctive attitude or evaluation
i. We felt incensed [that he should have been treated so
leniently].
ii. It is wrong [that a judge should sit while his conduct is under
investigation].
iii. what held his interest was the fact [that these two should
have been there at all].
a good idea, can't imagine, a pity, impossible, right,
appropriate, improper, suitable, puzzling, …

WD 09/10 102
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Subjunctive construction

 may
The matrix predicate relates to the actualisation of the state of
affaires expressed by the content clause.
i. We hope [that he may make a complete recovery].
ii. She had dreaded still more [that he might return to England].

notation convention:
A verb (that) σ
A verb if/whether σ

WD 09/10 103
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Factivity

 Factivity
The semantic properties of the governing item determine whether
or not σ is entailed, and whether or not, in the default case, it is
presupposed.
 entailment
A verb (that) σ → σ
(semantic notion, truth implication/truth entailment)
i. It happened [that Kim had left the country]
ii. Jill managed [that Kim left the country]
iii. It is true [that Kim had left the country]

WD 09/10 104
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Factivity

 presupposition
Speaker says: A verb (that) σ → speaker takes the truth of σ for
granted, in the absence of indications to the contrary.
− pragmatic notion, i.e. implicature of truth
− linguistic items triggering this prespuppositions are called to
be factive
i. Bill knows [that Jill had lent Ed her key].
ii. Does Bill know [that Jill had lent Ed her key]?
2 pieces of information differing in their pragmatic status
Jill had lent Ed her key (= σ) Jill knows σ

backgounded foregrounded
(presupposed) (asserted)

WD 09/10 105
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Factivity

 negative entailment
A verb (that) σ → ¬ σ
i. [That we intended to defraud you] is simply false
ii. Jill refuted [that Bill was right]
 negative presupposition
i. Jill pretended [that she was seriously ill]
ii. Ed wished [that her parents were still alive]

WD 09/10 106
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Factivity

 truth and non-truth presupposing contexts

 truth entailing contexts
i. Bill knows [that Jill had lent Ed her key].
ii. It happened [that Kim had left the country]
iii. Jill managed [that Kim left the country]
iv. It is true [that Kim had left the country]
 truth presupposing contexts
i. Does Bill know [that Jill had lent Ed her key]?
ii. Bill does not know [that Jill had lent Ed her key].
 non truth presupposing contexts
i. Did Jill manage [that Kim had left the country]
ii. Did it happen [that Kim had left the country]
iii. Is it true that [that Kim had left the country]
WD 09/10 107
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Factivity

 truth presupposing contexts

o predicates
i. Ed regretted [that he offended his parents]
ii. Ed confessed that [he muredered her husband]
o adverbial clauses
i. Ed went out [before [his parents came home]]
ii. Mozart died [before [he finished his Requiem]]

WD 09/10 108
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Factivity

ENTAILING NON-ENTAILING

a. find out, forget, know,

point out, remember, a. admit, confess, regret,
FACTIVE because, since , … resent, angry, sad, sorry,
b. amuse, bother, matter, before
important, surprising, …

a. announce, appear,
assume, believe,
a. happen, prove, show,,
conclude, conjecture,
turn out
NON-FACTIVE hope, tell, cetain,
b. evident, inevitable,
idea, if, lest, provided
obvious, true, …
b. likely, possible,
pobable
a: post head b: subject

WD 09/10 109
 7 Mood, tense, and factivity
Factivity

 syntactic relevance of factivity

 prohibition of gaps found only with factive verbs and adjectives
allowing the insertion of the fact
i. the errors which I think [I saw _]
ii. *the errors which I regret [I saw _]
iii. the errors which I know [I saw _]
iv. Who is likely [she'll invite _]
v. *Who is it strange [that she'll invite _]
vi. Who do I know [she'll invite _]
 allows non-exhaustive wh-forms
i. I regret (it) who has failed the examen
ii. I know (it) who has failed the examen

WD 09/10 110
 8 Some issues of syntactic analysis
Subordinators

 Subordinators and prepositions

Subordinate clauses are introduced by
 subordinators (S-class)
that, whether, if1 ("whether")
 prepositions which head them (P-class)
after, if2 (conditional), since, though, unless, ...

WD 09/10 111
 8 Some issues of syntactic analysis
Subordinators

 P-class subordinating conjunctions are

 heads
Please bring the washing in [before/if it rains]
His behaviour [after you left] was atrocious
− because they have evident semantic content
 prepositions
the complements of which can be of different parts of speech
I won't do it *I won't do it
[unless [CP you pay me] ] [unless [NP payment]]
We complained [CP that they *We complained [NP the lack of
didn't consult with the staff ] consultation with the staff]

just/shortly before [CP it ended ] just/shortly before [NP the end ]

WD 09/10 112
 8 Some issues of syntactic analysis
Content clauses and traditional grammar

 content clauses and traditional grammar

traditional grammar H&P

[That he must be guilty]

nominal
must be obvious to everyone

They have all the equipment content clause

adjectival
[they need]

The weather was so bad [that

adverbial
they cancelled the concert]

− classification of traditional G is functional and not determined by the

form

WD 09/10 113
 8 Some issues of syntactic analysis
Content clauses and the function object

 Content clauses and the function object

dependents of V

complements modifiers
subject S NP CP
are related more adjuncts
closely to the they do not
verb object O NP
belong to the
they belong to argument
the argument predicative PC AP NP
structure of V
structure of V
They recieve a ? CP
semantic role by
PPs (compl. of [PP P[NP]]
V
prep. verbs) [PP P[CP]]

WD 09/10 114
 8 Some issues of syntactic analysis
Content clauses and the function object

 Content clauses and the function object

FORM SYN.-SEM. STATUS SYNT.FUNCTION

external comp. subject

headed by V
internal comp. ?non-object

headed by P internal comp. ?

content
clause (PP headed by V) only interrog. adverbial

not headed adverbial

modifier/
adjunct
headed by not headed P

WD 09/10 115
 8 Some issues of syntactic analysis
Content clauses and the function object

 Differences between content clause complements and NP-objects

 linear position not just after the verb
*He opened slowly the door
He denied categorically that he had spoken to her
 verbs which do not license NPs
I often marvel that intelligent people can at times be so petty
 no contrast between 'pure' CP and CP oblique complements
He rejoiced [PP at [NP her decisive victory] ]
*He rejoiced [PP at [CP that she had won so decisively]
He rejoiced that she had won so decisively

WD 09/10 116