Running Head: SLAVERY 1
Running Head: SLAVERY 1
Running Head: SLAVERY 1
Slavery
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
SLAVERY 2
Slavery
Slavery existed in Africa long before the arrival of European slave traders although
its form was different. Slavery in Africa was usually the result of debt, criminal activity, or
war crimes. Slaves from other clans and regions were adopted into the tribe with a variety of
rights with the only limitation being their freedom of movement. They would often form
complex relationships with their captors and had the chance of gaining their freedom after a
specified duration. Olaudah Equiano, a former slave who reminisced of African slaves ‘well
fed and treated well’ and who might own their slaves over time (Allison, 2016). In some
communities, slaves also worked in government administration and might even gain wide
ranging powers. Africans often kidnapped people outside their own particular ethnic, or
cultural, group but on a small scale to supply the local needs. However, this changed with the
introduction of Chattel slavery which involves assigning property rights to people where they
Initially, African slaves were exported to the American plantations under indentured
contracts which gave them a chance to regain their freedom. Indentured servants agreed to
work for a specified number of years in exchange for transportation to America and food and
shelter once they arrived. African and European indentured servants were treated mostly the
same under the law and in the plantations although the particular living conditions and duties
depended on the master’s wealth. However, the state and federal regulations were adapted
over time to facilitate increasing rights to the slave owners and decreased civil and social
rights for the slaves. The period of service usually ranged from four to seven years although
some plantation owners would exploit children for much longer (Prager, 2016). However,
chattel slavery involved lifetime ownership of a slave which also bequeathed the masters
The rules governing slave ownership varied from state to state although Virginia was
the first to legally acknowledge slavery with a 1661 ordainment. The next year, two
additional laws were passed specifically targeting indentured women and their children who
would now be born into slavery with no chance of redemption. Furthermore, such women
could be punished with continued indentured servitude of up to two years if they had
illegitimate children with their masters. While both whites and blacks had traditionally traced
their lineage through their fathers, Act XII mandated that “all negro children would serve
according to the condition of the mother” which would give plantation owners additional life
time value from slave purchase while absolving them responsibility from illegitimate children
(Brown, 2012). However, this provision was later repealed to close the evident loophole
where children born of a free mother and slave father were technically free. The amendment
stated that a free white woman who had a bastard child by a Negro or mulatto man had to pay
fifteen pounds sterling within one month of the birth (Brown, 2012). If she could not pay, she
would become an indentured servant for five years. Whether or not the fine was paid,
The final veneer of civility came in 1705 when the Viriginia General Assembly
confirmed their support of the changing slavery and servitude paradigm. Under the new rules,
all servants imported and brought into the Country...who were not Christians in their native
Country...shall be accounted and be slaves.” These included Asians, Indians, and Mexicans
coming into the country. Slaves who attempted to flee or correct their masters were punished
severely to discourage others. Since these slaves did not have property rights and could not
pay fines, they were assigned harsh physical punishments for small errors. They would
require permission from their masters to leave the plantations, those charged with rape or
murder would be hanged, robbing and other charges were assigned sixty lashes and
SLAVERY 4
placement in stocks, where his or her ears would be cut off, and that for minor offences, such
as associating with whites, slaves would be whipped, branded, or maimed (Brown, 2012).
These excesses have been documented extensively in the diaries and journals of slave owners
who justified their proclivities through a paternalistic worldview that perceived non-white
races as inferior.
provide an objective judgment. However, with the slave codes of 1705, these provisions
changed as a slave owner who sought to break the most rebellious of slaves could now inflict
any punishment including death with no fear of repercussions from the law. Furthermore, the
changing rules over time ensured that plantation owners who purchased more slaves initially
had better chances of building and retaining their wealth. Moreover, owners became free to
punish their slaves as they saw fit with no judiciary or legal intervention. This was in stark
contrast to the African form of slavery which had assigned slaves civil and political rights
References
Brown, K. M. (2012). Good wives, nasty wenches, and anxious patriarchs: Gender, race, and
Prager, S. (2016). Book Review: Alan Taylor. American Revolutions: A Continental History,
1750-1804. NY: WW Norton and Company, 2016. Saber and Scroll, 5(4), 8.