Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Running Head: SLAVERY 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Running head: SLAVERY 1

Slavery

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation
SLAVERY 2

Slavery

Slavery existed in Africa long before the arrival of European slave traders although

its form was different. Slavery in Africa was usually the result of debt, criminal activity, or

war crimes. Slaves from other clans and regions were adopted into the tribe with a variety of

rights with the only limitation being their freedom of movement. They would often form

complex relationships with their captors and had the chance of gaining their freedom after a

specified duration. Olaudah Equiano, a former slave who reminisced of African slaves ‘well

fed and treated well’ and who might own their slaves over time (Allison, 2016). In some

communities, slaves also worked in government administration and might even gain wide

ranging powers. Africans often kidnapped people outside their own particular ethnic, or

cultural, group but on a small scale to supply the local needs. However, this changed with the

introduction of Chattel slavery which involves assigning property rights to people where they

can be purchased and sold at will for life durations.

Initially, African slaves were exported to the American plantations under indentured

contracts which gave them a chance to regain their freedom. Indentured servants agreed to

work for a specified number of years in exchange for transportation to America and food and

shelter once they arrived. African and European indentured servants were treated mostly the

same under the law and in the plantations although the particular living conditions and duties

depended on the master’s wealth. However, the state and federal regulations were adapted

over time to facilitate increasing rights to the slave owners and decreased civil and social

rights for the slaves. The period of service usually ranged from four to seven years although

some plantation owners would exploit children for much longer (Prager, 2016). However,

chattel slavery involved lifetime ownership of a slave which also bequeathed the masters

power over life and death.


SLAVERY 3

The rules governing slave ownership varied from state to state although Virginia was

the first to legally acknowledge slavery with a 1661 ordainment. The next year, two

additional laws were passed specifically targeting indentured women and their children who

would now be born into slavery with no chance of redemption. Furthermore, such women

could be punished with continued indentured servitude of up to two years if they had

illegitimate children with their masters. While both whites and blacks had traditionally traced

their lineage through their fathers, Act XII mandated that “all negro children would serve

according to the condition of the mother” which would give plantation owners additional life

time value from slave purchase while absolving them responsibility from illegitimate children

(Brown, 2012). However, this provision was later repealed to close the evident loophole

where children born of a free mother and slave father were technically free. The amendment

stated that a free white woman who had a bastard child by a Negro or mulatto man had to pay

fifteen pounds sterling within one month of the birth (Brown, 2012). If she could not pay, she

would become an indentured servant for five years. Whether or not the fine was paid,

however, the child would be bound in service for thirty years.

The final veneer of civility came in 1705 when the Viriginia General Assembly

confirmed their support of the changing slavery and servitude paradigm. Under the new rules,

all servants imported and brought into the Country...who were not Christians in their native

Country...shall be accounted and be slaves.” These included Asians, Indians, and Mexicans

coming into the country. Slaves who attempted to flee or correct their masters were punished

severely to discourage others. Since these slaves did not have property rights and could not

pay fines, they were assigned harsh physical punishments for small errors. They would

require permission from their masters to leave the plantations, those charged with rape or

murder would be hanged, robbing and other charges were assigned sixty lashes and
SLAVERY 4

placement in stocks, where his or her ears would be cut off, and that for minor offences, such

as associating with whites, slaves would be whipped, branded, or maimed (Brown, 2012).

These excesses have been documented extensively in the diaries and journals of slave owners

who justified their proclivities through a paternalistic worldview that perceived non-white

races as inferior.

In early Virginia, disputes with a master could be adjudicated by a public court to

provide an objective judgment. However, with the slave codes of 1705, these provisions

changed as a slave owner who sought to break the most rebellious of slaves could now inflict

any punishment including death with no fear of repercussions from the law. Furthermore, the

changing rules over time ensured that plantation owners who purchased more slaves initially

had better chances of building and retaining their wealth. Moreover, owners became free to

punish their slaves as they saw fit with no judiciary or legal intervention. This was in stark

contrast to the African form of slavery which had assigned slaves civil and political rights

with the only deficiency being a freedom of movement.


SLAVERY 5

References

Allison, R. J. (2016). Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano: Written by

Himself. Macmillan Higher Education.

Brown, K. M. (2012). Good wives, nasty wenches, and anxious patriarchs: Gender, race, and

power in colonial Virginia. The University of North Carolina Press.

Prager, S. (2016). Book Review: Alan Taylor. American Revolutions: A Continental History,

1750-1804. NY: WW Norton and Company, 2016. Saber and Scroll, 5(4), 8.

You might also like