Cambridge Assessment International Education: English As A Second Language 0510/22 October/November 2017
Cambridge Assessment International Education: English As A Second Language 0510/22 October/November 2017
Cambridge Assessment International Education: English As A Second Language 0510/22 October/November 2017
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2017 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE®, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
AO1: Reading
R1 identify and retrieve facts and details
R2 understand and select relevant information
R3 recognise, understand ideas, opinions and attitudes and the connections between the related
ideas
R4 understand what is implied but not actually written, e.g. gist, relationships, writer’s
purpose/intention, writer’s feelings, situation or place
AO2: Writing
W1 communicate clearly, accurately and appropriately
W2 convey information and express opinions effectively
W3 employ and control a variety of grammatical structures
W4 demonstrate knowledge and understanding of a range of appropriate vocabulary
W5 observe conventions of paragraphing, punctuation and spelling
W6 employ appropriate register/style
90
1(b) picnic 1
1(e) ashes spread on the fields / ashes encourage growth of new crops 1
2(e) octopus(es) 1
2(i) 53 1
3 Section A
Age: 17 9
Email: dombr@gmail.com 9
Section B
Sample sentences:
We can only go away during school holidays and Rebecca is a vegetarian.
Also accept the examples below:
We can only go away in the school holidays as both my parents are teachers.
My sister Rebecca is a vegetarian and wants to know if vegetarian food is
available.
Marking Criteria
Exercise 4: Lions
5 Content: Max 6
Language: Max 5
0 marks:
no understanding of the task / no relevant content / meaning completely
obscure due to serious language inaccuracies
1 mark:
copying without discrimination from text / multiple language inaccuracies
2 marks:
heavy reliance on language from the text with no attempt to organise and
sequence points cohesively / limited language expression making meaning at
times unclear
3 marks:
some reliance on language from the text, but with an attempt to organise and
sequence points cohesively / language satisfactory, but with some
inaccuracies
4 marks:
good attempt to use own words and to organise and sequence points
cohesively / generally good control of language
5 marks:
good, concise summary style / very good attempt to use own words and to
organise and sequence points cohesively
6 Email 19
7 Extended writing 19
The following general instructions, and table of marking criteria, apply to both exercises.
1 Award the answer a mark for content (C) [out of 10] and a mark for language (L) [out of 9] in
accordance with the General Criteria table that follows.
2 Content covers relevance (i.e. whether the piece fulfils the task and the awareness of
purpose/audience/register) and the development of ideas (i.e. the detail/explanation provided
and how enjoyable it is to read).
3 Language covers style (i.e. complexity of vocabulary and sentence structure) and accuracy (of
grammar, spelling, punctuation and use of paragraphs).
4 When deciding on a mark for content or language, first of all decide which mark band is most
appropriate. There will not necessarily be an exact fit. Then decide between 2 marks within that
mark band. Use the lower mark if it only just makes it into the band and the upper mark if it fulfils
all the requirements of the band but doesn’t quite make it into the band above.
5 When deciding on a mark for content, look at both relevance and development of ideas. First
ask yourself whether the writing fulfils the task, in terms of points to be covered and the length. If
it does, it will be in at least the 4–5 mark band. If one bullet point is missing, a maximum mark of
C4 can be awarded.
6 When deciding on a mark for language, look at both the style and the accuracy of the language.
A useful starting point would be first to determine whether errors intrude. If they do not, it will be
in at least the 4–5 mark band.
7 The use of paragraphs should not be the primary basis of deciding which mark band the work is
in. Look first at the language used and decide on a mark, and if there are no paragraphs, deduct
one mark.
8 If the essay is considerably shorter than the stated word length, i.e. fewer than 105 words, it
should be put in mark band 2–3 for content or lower for not fulfilling the task. The language mark
is likely to be affected and is unlikely to be more than one band higher than the content mark.
9 If the essay is totally irrelevant and has nothing to do with the question asked, it should be given
0 marks for Cont0ent and Language, even if it is enjoyable to read and fluent.
10 If the essay is partly relevant and therefore in mark band 2–3, the full range of marks for
language is available.
Fulfils the task, with consistently A range of language, idiom and tenses.
appropriate register and very good Award 8 marks.
sense of purpose and audience.
Award 8/9 marks. Accuracy:
Well-constructed and linked paragraphs
Development of ideas: with very few errors of any kind.
Original, well-developed ideas. Quality is
sustained. Outstanding.
Award 10 marks.
Relevance: Style:
Fulfils the task, with appropriate register Sentences show variety of structure and
and a good sense of purpose and length. Attempt at sophisticated
audience. vocabulary and idiom. Award 7 marks.
Award 7 marks.
Sentences show some style and
Fulfils the task, with appropriate register ambitious language. However, there may
and some sense of purpose and be some awkwardness making reading
audience. less enjoyable. Award 6 marks.
Award 6 marks.
Accuracy:
Development of ideas: Mostly accurate apart from minor errors
Ideas are developed at appropriate which may include infrequent spelling
length. Engages reader’s interest. errors. Good use of paragraphing and
linking words. Award 7 marks.
Relevance: Style:
Fulfils the task. A satisfactory attempt Mainly simple structures and vocabulary
has been made to address the topic, but but sometimes attempting a wider range
there may be digressions. of language. Award 5 marks.
Award 5 marks.
Mainly simple structures and vocabulary.
Does not quite fulfil the task although Award 4 marks.
there are some positive qualities. There
may be digressions. Accuracy:
Award 4 marks. Meaning is clear and of a safe standard.
Grammatical errors occur when
Development of ideas: attempting more ambitious language.
Material is satisfactorily developed at Paragraphs are used, showing some
appropriate length. coherence. Award 5 marks.
Relevance: Style:
Partly relevant and some engagement Simple structures and vocabulary.
with the task. Inappropriate register,
showing insufficient awareness of Accuracy:
purpose and / or audience. Meaning is sometimes in doubt.
Award 3 marks. Frequent errors do not seriously impair
communication.
Partly relevant and limited engagement Award 3 marks.
with the task. Inappropriate register,
showing insufficient awareness of Meaning is often in doubt. Frequent,
purpose and / or audience. distracting errors which slow down
Award 2 marks. reading.
Award 2 marks.
Development of ideas:
Supplies some detail but the effect is
incomplete and repetitive.
Very limited engagement with task, but Multiple types of error in grammar /
this is mostly hidden by density of error. spelling / word usage / punctuation
Award 1 mark. throughout, which mostly make it difficult
to understand. Occasionally, sense can
No engagement with the task or any be deciphered. Award 1 mark.
engagement with task is completely
hidden by density of error. Density of error completely obscures
Award 0 marks. meaning. Whole sections impossible to
recognise as pieces of English writing.
If essay is completely irrelevant, no mark Award 0 marks.
can be given for language.