Self Healing1
Self Healing1
Self Healing1
Abstract: In recent years, there is increasing interest in the phenomenon of mechanical property recovery in
concrete construction using self-healing concrete. The study was motivated by the need to find a solution for the
problem of cracking approaching the concept of self-healing concrete. The study was carried out on a bacteria
based self-healing concrete using Bacillus Subtilis bacteria. The present paper describes the effect of this
bacteria on the strength of concrete. An investigation on the strength assessment of the bacteria-based self-
healing concrete by finding out the optimum amount of bacterial content to be added to obtain maximum
strength is depicted in this.
Keywords - Bacillus Subtilis, Bacterial concrete, Self–healing
I. Introduction
Concrete is a major material used in the construction field, from the foundation of buildings to the
structures of bridges and dams. Several construction techniques without incorporating concrete have been
developed but concrete still continues to be the most important building material for infrastructure. The major
shortcoming of concrete is that it tends to crack when subjected to tension. Tiny cracks formed on the surface of
the concrete make the whole structure vulnerable due to seepage of water into the concrete, promoting corrosion
of the steel reinforcement, thus reducing the life span of the structure. Self-healing concrete is a solution to this
problem of durability of concrete structures and has also received increasing attention as a smart material with
interesting potential applications in civil infrastructure. Self-healing materials used in such type of concrete have
the ability to heal the damage inflicted on the concrete partially or completely, thereby restoring the original
functionality of the structure. Self-healing system can achieve a tremendous cost reduction in terms of health
monitoring, damage detection and maintenance of concrete structures, assuring a safe service life of the structure.
lightweight aggregate particles can be added to the concrete mixture. These particles may release water when a
crack occurs and moisture gradients stimulate the flow of water[1].
based self-healing process has been found to heal cracks completely up to 0.5 mm width. On the surface of
control concrete, Calcium Carbonate will be formed due to the reaction of CO 2 present with Calcium Hydroxide
present in the concrete matrix according to the following reaction:
The Calcium Carbonate production in this case is rationed due to the limited amount of CO 2 present.
As Ca(OH)2 is a soluble mineral, it gets dissolved in entering water and diffuse out of the crack in the form of
leaching. The self-healing process in bacteria incorporated concrete is much more efficient due to the active
metabolic conversion of Calcium nutrients by the bacteria present in concrete:
Here Calcium Carbonate is produced directly due to microbial metabolic process and also indirectly
due to autogeneous healing. This process results in efficient bacteria-based crack sealing mechanism. Ureolytic
bacteria, Bacillus Subtilis JC3 can precipitate CaCO3 in the high alkaline environment by converting urea into
Ammonium and Carbonate. The Ammonia degradation of urea increases the pH locally and promotes the
microbial deposition of carbonate as calcite crystals in a calcium rich environment sealing the crack and
maintains the pH of concrete.
5.4 Water
Locally available portable water confirming to standards specified in IS:456-2000 is used.
5.5 Microorganisms
Bacillus Subtilis JC3, a laboratory cultured bacterium collected from Kerala Agricultural University
Mannuthy, was used. Bacteria in suspension with a concentration of 10 8 cells/ml was collected and 103, 104, 105
and 106 cells/ml of bacterial concentration was made from the obtained sample
Citrate utilization -
Catalase activity +
Gelatin liquefaction +
Starch hydrolysis +
Lipid hydrolysis +
Note: “+” :- Present “-“ :- Absent [Sunil et. al. 2010]
Figure 1: Phase contrast microphotograph of strain JC3 (Long rods, 0.6-0.8 μm in width and 2.0 to 3.0 μm in length,
gram positive) [Sunil et. al. 2010]
Figure 2: Colony morphology of strain JC3 on nutrient agar plate (Irregular, dry, white, opaque colonies) [Sunil et.
al. 2010]
Table 2: Effect Of The Bacillus Subtilis Jc3 Bacteria Addition On Compressive Strength
Cell concentration/ml of Average Compressive Strength of Concrete Cube in Mpa
mixing water 7 days % increase 28 days % increase
100 (Control mix) 11.55 - 17.77 -
3
10 13.33 15.41 18.67 5.06
4
10 14.22 23.12 24.88 40.01
5
10 14.33 24.07 25.33 42.54
6
10 14.22 23.12 18.67 5.06
Table 3: Effect Of The Bacillus Subtilis Jc3 Bacteria Addition On Split Tensile Strength
Average Split Tensile Strength of Concrete
Cell concentration/ml Cylinder in Mpa
of mixing water
28 days % increase
0
10 (Control mix) 1.56 -
3
10 2.12 35.90
4
10 2.26 44.87
5
10 2.55 63.46
Table 4: Effect Of The Bacillus Subtilis Jc3 Bacteria Addition On Acid Test
Average Compressive Average % loss in
Strength Cube (MPa) weight
Type of mix
90 90 %
% increase
days days decrease
Control mix 17.93 - 0.52 -
Bacterial concrete
of 105 cells/ml 18.67 4.13 0.36 44.44
concentration
Table 5: Effect Of The Bacillus Subtilis Jc3 Bacteria Addition On Water Absorption Test
Average increase
% Decrease of
in weight due to
Type of mix water
water absorption
absorption rate
in %
Control mix 0.443 -
Bacterial
concrete of 105
0.368 16.93
cells/ml
concentration
Table 6: Effect Of The Bacillus Subtilis Jc3 Bacteria Addition On Chloride Test
Average
Compressive Average % loss
Strength Cube in weight
Type of mix
(MPa)
90 % 90 %
days increase days decrease
Control mix 32.88 - 0.86 -
Bacterial
concrete of
34.66 5.41 0.36 58.14
105 cells/ml
concentration
Figure 3: Variation of 7 days and 28 days compressive strength and split tensile strength of concrete samples
according to bacterial concentration
IX. Conclusion
The experimental study shows that the addition of bacteria Bacillus Subtilis JC3 in concrete shows
improvements in various properties of concrete in terms of compressive strength, split tensile strength, porosity,
acid resistance and chloride resistance. As the bacteria can be produced in the laboratory, it could be proved to be
safe and very cost effective. Bacterial concrete with a concentration of bacteria of 105cells/ml was found to give
best results out of the samples used. Hence it could be concluded that this particular concentration give optimum
results which is proven by 42% increase in compressive strength and 63% increase in split tensile strength when
compared to conventional concrete. Durability tests relieved that bacterial concrete have higher Acid Durability
Factor and higher Acid Attack Factor from Acid Tests results. Bacterial concrete exhibited lower rate of water
absorption than conventional concrete. This is due to the bacteria induced formation of Calcium Carbonate in the
pores present in concrete, leading to a lesser voids and hence a lesser permeability. Bacterial concrete is less
vulnerable to Chloride Attack also. The study accomplishes that the use of bacteria (Bacillus Subtilis) in concrete
enhances its strength and durability hence using this type of bacteria for self-healing mechanism in concrete can
produce cost effective strong or durable structures.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express gratitude to Akbar Shah A. A., Gayathri S., Ponnu S. V. and Smitha Thomas
of Department of Civil Engineering, Sree Narayana Gurukulam College of Engineering, Kadayiruppu for their
sincere efforts in carrying out the experimental works to bring up this study.
References
[1]. Klaas van Breugel, Self-Healing Material Concepts As Solution For Aging Infrastructure, 37th Conference on Our World in
Concrete & Structures 29-31 August 2012, Singapore
[2]. Yueqiang Sui, Mechanical Behavior Of FRP-Confined Self-Healing Concrete, Master Thesis, Louisiana State University and
Agricultural and Mechanical College, Xiamen University, 2014
[3]. Sonja Then, Gan Seng Neon & Noor Hayaty Abu Kasim, Optimization of Microencapsulation Process for Self-Healing Polymeric
Material, Sains Malaysiana 40(7)(2011): 795–802
[4]. Song, G., Ma, N., and Li, H. N. (2006). Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures. Engineering Structures, 28: 1266-
1274.
[5]. Henk M Jonkers, Erik Schalengon, A two composite bacteria based self healing concrete, Journal Of Cement And Concrete
Research, pp 215-220
[6]. S. Sunil Pratap Reddy, M. V. Seshagiri Rao, P. Aparna and C. H. Sasikala, Performance of Ordinary Grade Bacterial (Bacillus
Subtilis) Concrete, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 01, February 2010, pp.
116-124
[7]. C.C. Gavimath, B.M.Mali, V.R.Hooli,A.B Patil, Potential application of bacteria to improve the strength of cement concrete,
International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research (2011), pp 541-544.
[8]. J.Y. Wang1, K. Van Tittelboom1, N. De Belie1 and W. Verstraete,Potential of Applying Bacteria to Heal Cracks in Concrete,
Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, (2010)
[9]. Kim Van Tittleboom, Nele de Belie, Willem De Muyunk, Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete, Journal of Cement concrete
and Research (2010), pp 157-166.
[10]. R. S. Trask, G. J. Williams and I. P. Bond, Bioinspired self-healing of advanced composite structures using hollow glass fibres,
Journal of the Royal Society Interface (2007) 4, 363–371
[11]. S. Ghosh, M. Biswas a, B.D. Chattopadhyay, S. Mandal, Microbial activity on the microstructure of bacteria modified mortar ,
Journal of cement and concrete research(2009) , pp 93-98
[12]. Virginie Wiktor, Henk M Jonkers, Quantification of crack healing in novel bacteria based self healing concrete, Journal of cement
and concrete composites (2011), pp 763-770.