Determination of Acoustic Velocities For Natural Gas
Determination of Acoustic Velocities For Natural Gas
Determination of Acoustic Velocities For Natural Gas
Introduction
Some uses of acoustic velocities for natural gas are Calculation of Acoustic Velocity
to determine liquid levels in gas wells and to locate Starting from the equation for the speed of sound in
hydrate freezes, lost 'pigs', or other obstructions in a compressible fluid 9
gas pipelines. These distances can be calculated from
well defined acoustic records (Fig. 1a) by associating
the number of pipe sections with their corresponding
Vt = [(ap) ]~
':I
up s
' • (2)
lengths. If, however, an uninterpretable acoustic it is possible to derive the following equation for a
record (Fig. 1b) is obtained, or if the lengths of the real gas (see Appendix).
pipe sections of a given flow string are unknown,
]~
distance between the shot deflection and the reflecting
surface can be obtained by integrating the relation- Vt-
_ [ gczKRT
P
1-- -
(az) . (3)
Acoustic velocities for natural gas are calculated as a function of temperature, pressure,
and gas gravity. The method is based on.a generalized equation of state for natural gas that
may also be used to calculate a number of thermodynamic properties such as specific
internal energy and isentropic expansion.
Ppc
and is related to Tvn Pvr and gas compressibility fac-
tor, z, by the following equation:
A
The basic gas compressibility data 2 as presented
8
in tabular reduced form by Poettmann and Carpenter6
Fig. !-Acoustic records. were used to evaluate the reduced BWR coefficients;
Two sets of coefficients were developed to obtain the
desired accuracy over the entire Pvr range from 0.4
to 15. The first set of reduced BWR coefficients,
750
Table 1, is applicable for Pvr from 0.4 to 5 and the
F 700 second set applies to the range of Pvr from 5 to 15.
141.
a:
::;::)
I-
650 The low reduced temperature limit of the correlation
<
a: is Tvr = 1.1.
1.41 600
0...
::::!!
w
I- 550 Correlation of Pseudocritical Temperature and
.....1
500
Pseudocritical Pressure with Gas Gravity
<
u
i= Data relating gas composition to gravity were obtained
a:
u
450
on 84 casinghead gas wells from the Phillips Natural
0
0
::;::)
400 Gas and Gasoline Dept. and were used to extend the
1.41
U)
0... 350 Tpc = 170.491 +307.344 ?'g NGPSA 2 • 4 correlations for the critical properties of
300 natural gas vs gas gravity. The Phillips data were all
.5 .6 .7 .6 .9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 recent (less than 7 years old) and represent wells
GAS GRAVITY from different fields in several states. They were lim-
Fig. 2-Pseudocritical temperature as a ited to those points analyzed by gas chromatography
function of gas gravity. rather than by wet analysis.
The data from the well logs were processed as
follows:
1. The pseudocritical temperatures and pseudo-
680
< critical pressures at each point were calculated using
~ 670
w'
a:
::;::) 660
U)
U)
w
a: 650 TABLE I-COEFFICIENTS FOR THE REDUCED
a...
.....1
BENEDICT-WEBB-RUBIN EQUATION OF
< 640
u STATE FOR NATURAL GAS
i= 630
a:
u Coefficient Pprfrom 0.4 to 5.0 Ppr from 5.0 to 15.0
0
0 620 a,. 0.001290236 0.0014507882
::;::)
w
U)
a... 610 Aor 0.38193005 0.37922269
br 0.022199287 0.024181399
.6 .7 .8 .9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Bor 0.12215481 0.11812287
Cr -0.015674794 0.037905663
GAS GRAVITY 0.027271364 0.19845016
Cor
Fig. 3-Pseudocritical pressure as a ar 0.023834219 0.048911693
function of gas gravity. Yr 0.43617780 0.0631425417
and the specific heat capacity at constant volume from Discussion of Results
Eq. 14. The specific heat at constant pressure was Acoustic velocities for natUral gas have been calcu-
then calculated by adding the results from Eqs. 14 lated· using the technique described in the previous
and 15. section and are presented in Figs. 4 through 7. These
The derivatives on the right-hand side of Eq. 15 plots represent values of acoustic velocities for natural
can be evaluated from Eq. 6, and Cv can be obtained gas vs pseudoreduced temperature and pseudoreduced
by differentiating the BWR equation for internal pressure for values of gas gravity of 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 and
energy 7 1.2, respectively.
·Figs. 8 through 11 show the relationship between
U = U0 - (A 0 + 3C 0 /T 2 ) __!_
J7 - ~(- 1
-)
2 J72
~5 + ~~ ( ~2
TABLE 2-COEFFICIENTS FOR THE CORRELATION OF
+ a5a ( ) ) LOW-PRESSURE ISOBARIC HEAT CAPACITY FOR
NATURAL GAS AS FUNCTION OF
[ (1 _ e~~/V ) J72 _ e-~v2]
2
TEMPERATURE AND GRAVITY
' . (16)
Temperature Range
0 to 200 oF 0 to 600 oF Units
with respect to temperature at constant volume. A 4.6435 3.7771 T: °F
The BWR coefficients in Eq. 16 are related to. the 8 -0.0079997 -0.0011050 Cp0:8tu/lbmole 0 R
reduced BWR coefficients listed in Table 1 by the c 5.8425 7.5281
following identities: D 1.1533 0.65621
E 0.020603 0.014609
(17) F 9.849 (l0- 6) 0.0
20000,-____,1.0~____2,.0______3,.0______~----~
1900
1600
1500
1400
1300
u
&&I 1200
V)
.......
....... 1100
u LL..
~ > 1000
....... 1-
.......
LL. u0 900
.,.: _, 800
....... &&I
u0 >
700
_, u
&&I i= 600
> aoo Cl)
~
0
~ u 2000
....
Cl) -<
8
~ 1800
2000
1900
1800 1600
1700
1600 1400
1500
1400 1200
5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 \. 9.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
PSEUDO REDUCED PRESSURE, Ppr.
PSEUDO REDUCED PRESSURE, Ppr
Fig. 5-Acoustic velocity for 0.8-gravity natural gas. Fig. 7-Acoustic velocity for 1.2-gravity natural gas.
~
1-
<C
..... 1.4 :I: 1.2
:I:
IJ... IJ...
0 0
G=.6 0
0 1.2 1.0
i=
<
T=100•F
~
0::
0::
.8 .8
Fig. 9-Ratio of heat capacity for 0.6-gravity Fig. 11-Ratio of heat capacity for 0.8-gravity
natural gas at 100°F. natural gasat 100°F.
6.0
6.0
,_- 5.0
5.0 ~
"'
,_.- :z
:z ~ 4.0
w ~
:z 4.0
0 u
o CALCULATED FROM BWR
~
0:: 3.0
0
a: EQUATION OF STATE
u
3.0 1-
G=.8
0:: o CALCULATED FROM BWR ~ 2.0
0 ~
a: EQUATION OF STATE
1- 2.0
G:6
~ 1.0
1.0
O0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7QOO 8000 9000 10,000
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10.000 PRESSURE. PS lA
PRESSURE, PSIA
Fig. 13-lsentropic exponent, n, for 0.8-gravity
Fig. 12-lsentropic exponent, n, for gravity natural gas. natural gas.
:~) r
LLI
0:
LL. 20 Solving for ( yields
LL.I
>
i=
<(
.....1
:::::>
p
10
( op) -
::::!:
:::::>
u
v (A-ll)
oV r - - l _ _.!!_(~)
1.0 2.0 z ap T
PERCENT ERROR
Combining Eqs. A-2, A-8, A-9 ahd A-ll gives the
Fig. 14-Frequency of error between computed ~nd desired result.
experimental well depths for 57 data points.
"1 -_.!!_(~)
I K(T,
Z
p) z RT
_Gp T
The terms on the right-hand side of Eq. A-4 can also by combining-Eqs. A-2, A-9 and A-13. We then have
be written as follows:
vf = ynzRT . (A-14)
(A-5) Inclusion of the gravitational constant, gc, in Eqs.
A -12 and A -14 is required to make the units con-
as) as ) sistent with the nomenclature. JPT
( av T _ T ( av 'I'
(A-6)
( ~)
Cv '·
Original manuscript received in Society of Petroleum Engineers
aT v office Aug. 6, 1969. Revised manuscript received April 6, 1970.
Paper (SPE 2579) was presented at SPE 44th Annual Fall Meeting,
held in Denver, Colo., Sept. 28-0ct. 1, 1969. © Copyright 1970
as ) _ ( aP ) ( av ) (A-7)
( 3P r - av 'I' ap 'I' •
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engi-
neers, Inc.
This paper will be printed in Transactions volume 249, which
Combining Eqs. A-4 through A-7 yields will cover 1970.