Performance Management Transformation
Performance Management Transformation
Performance Management Transformation
Performance Management
Transformation:
Zachary Standridge
Contact: zachary.standridge@mga.edu
Performance Management Transformation
Abstract
If you do a search for “performance review” on your favorite web crawling search engine,
your page will be flooded with results and news stories from the top 500 companies using six
sigma or Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) as their primer or set standard
om how the art of business are conducted. Many companies are stepping out of the shadow of
these monolithic companies and making strides in their own management way.
traditional standard is to focus on the process and not the people? Companies today are still
working hard to get out of the old ways which are formal and time line event-driven. The
employees feel a need to separate home life from work life which creates a division of desire
and not the process Christoffer Ellehuus, (2012). This means that the company has to be more
informal and outgoing and integrating life events into the work place. The work flow of a
management team is as follows: improve expectations and setting, build a culture of coaching
and feedback, simplify performance reviews. In the old industry standard, this can be done by
yearly goal setting, giving feedback only once or twice a year, and since the reviews happen
only once a year this requires more paperwork and documentation The new standard is
engaging dynamic and flexible goal settings, teaching managers to give on going feedback
No one like Performance management (PM). Employees dread seeing the review team
set up. The management doesn’t want the extra paperwork. If you asked anyone what good it
does, they would be hard pressed to give you a clear and concise answer. When managers
were polled about their feelings on PM, the statistics have shown a negative swing in the over
59% of employees polled felt as if PM reviews are not worth the time invested and
The hardest part of change is realizing that you are using a broken system. It is
difficult to cut ties when you have invested so many years and manhours into the false idea
that the performance management format will help you. Companies which have based their
forced ranking systems, such as Microsoft, Geico, and Adobe, are slowly starting to come
around to the idea and look for new ways to to accomplish what was actually wanted and so
work environments changing so rapidly, changing with them is required. The company has to
become more agile. This means finding where you are most productive and getting a better
sense of what exactly you are as a company. The company has to make things simpler while
still doing the same level of performance. This could be seen as just another way of being
agile and rewording something to make it sound different but the company would have to
take it to another level. They have to empower the teams and foster a healthy working
environment. Being agile in essence means expecting, embracing change, and managing the
management requires just a few principles to make it work correctly. The management has to
know and understand that PM is an ongoing process which cannot be cookie cutter fit to each
situation. Proper PM usage needs to emphasize that it has to be flexible enough to address the
needs of different departments, employee teams, and individuals. (Smith KA, Smith O,
Cheng R, Schiffel L. ) The relationships between the management and employees is the core
strength in proper PM so when the change is needed there has to be allowed a leeway or
References
Christoffer Ellehuus, (2012) "Transforming business leaders into talent champions", , Vol. 11
Issue: 2, pp.84-89, https://doi.org/10.1108/14754391211202143
Corporate Leadership Council. (2012). Driving breakthrough performance in the new work
environment (Catalog No. CLC4570512SYN). Washington, DC: Corporate Executive
Board. Google Scholar
Smith KA, Smith O, Cheng R, Schiffel L. Bridge the Gap Between Current Practice AND the
GASB-Suggested Criteria. Journal of Government Financial Management.
2008;57(2):42-47.
http://ezproxy.mga.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=32759151&site=eds-live&scope=site. Accessed January
21, 2019.