Doctrine of Mens Rea
Doctrine of Mens Rea
Doctrine of Mens Rea
Mens rea is the mental intention, ill intention, or fudge the defendant's state at the time of offense,
sometimes called the guilty mind. In the IPC, 1860, Mens rea is expressed as "ACTUS NON FACIT
REUM NISI MENS SIT REA" as a fundamental principle for penal liability. Intent and Act, both must
concur to constitute a crime. An act itself is no crime, unless it is coupled with an evil / criminal
intent.
Mens rea is a cardinal principle of law. It means "Mental element or Evil intent or Guilty mind". It may
be defined as the mental element is necessary to constitute a criminal liability. Mere commitment of
offense is not enough but it has to be proved that the offense was committed with "guilty mind".
Example - If a while playing cricket a person is hit by a ball and dies, a person hitting the ball cannot be
charged with murder as there was no mens rea.
In criminal offenses generally, Mens rea has to be proved by prosecution and quality of proof
required is heavy i.E. It should be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Thus in criminal offences heavy
burden is cast on government authorities regarding proof and hence many people are released by the
court as a proof of mens rea (culpable mental state) " is not enough.
a) Strict Liability -
Even though there is no guilty mind the person is held responsible for the act. Only some special
statute creates those liabilities. Act passed by parliament. These offences are against Public Health for
which such strict or absolute liability is imposed, for example-Essential Commodities Act, Food and Drug
Act, Consumer Protection Act etc.
Another exception to the doctrine Mens rea is where it is difficult to prove mens rea and penalties
are petty fines A statute may do away with the necessity of Mens rea on the basis of expediency. In such
petty cases, speedy disposal of cases is necessary and the proving of mens rea is not easy. An accused or
may be fined even without any proof of Mens Rea.
c) Public Nuisance -
Another exception to the doctrine of mens rea is in case of public nuisance. In the interest of public
safety, strict liability must be imposed. Whether a person causes public nuisance with guilty mind or
without guilty mind, he must be punishable.
Ignorance of law is no excuse. It is presumed that everybody knows the law of land. The principle of
ignorantia juris non excusat is followed in almost all legal systems. This is an irrebuttable presumption
that every person knows the law of the land.
Conclusion -
Mens rea is a technical term, generally taken to mean some blameworthy mental condition
whether constituted by intention or knowledge or otherwise the absence of which on any particular
occasion negatives and intentions of a crime. There are many exceptional cases where mens rea is not
required in criminal law some exceptions to the doctrine mens rea are mentioned above.