Yahweh Versus Marduk

Creation Theology in Isaiah 40-551

R. Reed Lessing

Introduction
Gen 1:26a undergirds this study of competing ideas of creation in Isaiah
a er
40-55. "Then God said, 'Let us make man in our image (Ήφ7??)5 f t out likeness
2
(ΉΓΠΰΊ?).' " Image (Ü?S) denotes the representation of something else, while likeness
(ΓΑΟΊ) qualifies image, lest in this case people conclude that they are exact images of
God. We are similar to God, while at the same time also distinct from him.
Being created in Yahweh's image and likeness denotes, among other things, that
3
we are made to reflect him. Pivotal, though, is this fact. When we refuse to emulate
the image and likeness of God our ability to reflect is not lost. It is just that instead of
becoming like our creator we become like something or someone else in creation. The
Bible calls this idolatry. Psalms 115:8 and 135:18 put it this way: "Those who make
[idols] will be like them." Our object of worship has a direct impact on who we are. To
quote Greg Beale, "We resemble what we revere, either for ruin or restoration."4
Two examples drive this point home. At the golden calf apostasy Israel is
described as people who "quickly turned aside on the way" (Ex 32:8) and are "stiff
necked" (Ex 32:9). Why are Israelites depicted in these terms? Cattle run wild and are
difficult to reign in. This means the people have become what they worshiped (cf.
Hos 4:16).5 The second illustration comes from Jeremiah 2:5 and 2 Kings 17:15. Both
verses state, in part, l^àïT! hiTJÏÏ ·ΗΠΚ ^DS"! ("and they walked after the Nothing
and became nothing"). 6 The Canaanite fertility deity Baal is sarcastically described as
;i?}?} "the Nothing." Israelites became like the god they worshiped, absolutely nothing.
People take on the character of the god they follow.
Granted, the debate pitting Israel's God against Babylon's god is a subtext of
Isaiah 40—55/ The prophet's chief concerns in these chapters include Cyrus and the
suffering servant. However, based upon the truth that we become like the god we serve,
this essay considers Isaiah's monumental creational theology in chapters 40—55 in light
of the differences between Yahweh and Marduk. The thrust of the article, then, is this:
Only as we worship Yahweh, the sovereign Lord of the universe, will we reflect his love and carefor the
environment.

R. Reed Lessing is an associate professor of Exegetical Theology and

Director of the Graduate School at Concordia Seminary, St Louis, Missouri.

Concordia Joyrnai/Summer 2010 234

The Setting of Isaiah 40-55
After the destruction of Judah and Jerusalem in 587 BC, the victorious Babylo-
nians brashly asserted that their god Marduk was king. This propaganda was intended
both to control the Babylonian populace, as well as to seduce captive Israelites away
from Yahweh and toward a life-long commitment to Marduk. Judeans were program-
matically coerced into believing the empire's ideology. Walter Brueggemann writes, "It
is unmistakable that Babylon was not only a political-military superpower; it was also
an advanced, sophisticated, winsome culture with its own theological rationale and its
own moral justifications."8 The empire offered so much more than life in little backwa-
ter Judah and dilapidated Jerusalem. Although some refused to be conformed to these
"new realities" (e.g., Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, see Daniel 3), many Judeans
accepted indoctrination and embraced the idea that the world was created and governed
by Marduk.9 Isaiah, able to foresee this dilemma, counters with a creational theology
of breathtaking splendor that climaxes with the command, "Say to Zion, *Your God is
King'" (Is 52:7). Isaiah argues that Yahweh's creational wisdom and strength are vastly
superior to that of Marduk's.
And the prophet is uniquely positioned to make such an assertion. Within the
corpus of chapters 40—55, Isaiah calls our attention to the grass and flowers (e.g., Is
40:6-7), oceans and mountains (Is 40:12), stars (Is 40:26), worms (Is 41:14), trees (e.g.,
Is 41:19), and even moths (Is 51:8). He knows the hot blast of the khamsin (Is 49:10), as
well as the gentle fall of rain and snow (Is 55:10). Isaiah writes about mountains and hills
(e.g., Is 40:4; 41:15) and must have marveled at an eagle in flight (Is 40:31). The prophet
could never forget the tenderness and innocence of a lamb (Is 53:7). Isaiah had a deep
love for the created order.10 In fact, Isaiah 40-55 has more to say about creation than
any other place in Holy Scripture.11
The prophet's soaring creational theology, however, does not take place in a vac-
uum. He employs it to convince Babylonian exiles that Yahweh is the king and creator.
One important repercussion of Isaiah's argument is the proper concern and conserva-
tion of the environment.

Marduk and Creation

In contrast to Israel's creation narrative, where Yahweh peacefully orders every-
thing by his word (Gn 1), the Babylonian creation saga is full of violence. The Enuma
Elis (Akkadian for "when on high", the saga's first two words) is dated to the end of the
second millennium BC and was composed by Babylonian clergy as a magisterial apology
for Marduk's supremacy.12 Whereas the focus of Atrahasis (an early second-millennium
Akkadian creation and flood account) is on how earthly resources and the human popu-
lation balance each other, the Enuma Elis promotes Marduk as the legitimate successor
to the older Babylonian deities, Ea and Enlil. While the epic is more concerned about
Marduk's rise to power in the Babylonian pantheon, by incorporating elements from
Atrahasis, it discusses the creation of the world and the origins of humanity.
The first tablet of the Enuma Elis begins by introducing Tiamat—the primeval
sea, personified as a dragon—who is in conflict with the gods. The tension mounts
in tablet 2 as Tiamat and her followers threaten the gods. Marduk is selected to fight

235
Tiamat, with the agreement that if he defeats her, he will be promoted to be the head
of the pantheon. In tablet 4 Marduk overthrows Tiamat and lays out the cosmos using
her corpse: "He [Marduk] split her [Tiamat] in two, like a fish for drying; half of her he
set up and made as a cover, heaven. Spreading half of her as a cover, he established the
earth." Tablet 6 depicts Marduk's establishment of the world and the creation of people
from the blood of Tiamat's partner, Qingu. Tablet 7 concludes the saga by stating fifty
names for Marduk that describe his characteristics, delineate his jurisdiction, and identify
his prerogatives. He is identified by universal epithets like "Great Lord", "Lord of the
Lands", "King of Heaven and Earth", "The Foremost of the Universe", "Hero of the
Gods", and "Lord of the Lords."13 The propaganda pumped into the populus was Mar-
duka ma surru—which, when translated from the Akkadian, means "Marduk is King!"14
The Enuma Elis was recited during the annual Akitu festival. This celebration is
very old, as attested by some scraps from the Ur III period (ca 2055 BC-1940 BC). The
Babylonian version represents the final chapter in the festival's development. By adding
a reading of the Enuma Elisto the Akitu festival, it became the empire's "propagandist
tool wielded to promote state ideology."15 The celebration was a twelve-day event held
at the beginning of each year.
The role of the Enuma Elis in the Akitu festival is best described as historióla, that
is, a mythological story intended to foreshadow a magical result. "In this case, Marduk's
mythical victory over evil demons on day four of the Akitu prefigured the removal of
demonic impurity in the kuppuru ritual of the following day."16 As with all mythological
rites, the Akitu sought to actualize order, fertility, and life in a world continually threat-
ened with chaos, sterility, and death.17 Adherents believed that as the narrative was re-
told and reenacted, the divine world interfaced with the world of space and time. In the
retelling of Marduk's victory of Tiamat, it was affirmed that the timeless story impacted
the lives of his followers. The victory of order over disorder that is perpetually happen-
ing in the realm of the deities was actualized for the present moment.
The brutal and bloodthirsty account of creation was not confined to the Esagila,
the Sumerian name for the temple dedicated to Marduk that housed his cult image and
where the Akitu festival took place. This violent creation narrative influenced Babylon
to respond in kind to the world around them. They became what they worshiped: a
people emulating Marduk. Like their god, Babylonians treated the environment with cal-
lousness and cruelty. One of the empire's frequent tactics in siege warfare was to destroy
trees, vineyards, and crops.18
To get some context of how thoroughly Babylonians wreaked havoc upon eco-
systems, we need to compare them with Assyria. Beginning in the twelfth century BC,
and extensively from the ninth century forward, Assyrian sources depict the massive
destruction of nature, often called "ecocide."19 Targeting a conquered people's agri-
culture served as punitive action. It was intended to inflict long-term economic, and
psychological pain. Babylon likewise destroyed the environment as a means of warfare,
yet they differed from Assyria in one major way. After time Assyria restored cities and
lands devastated by war (see 2 Kgs 17:24), but the Babylonians adopted a scorched-earth
policy. When they marched into Judah in the sixth century, they left vast swaths of land
dilapidated so as to create a buffer of wastelands between themselves and Egypt.20

Concordia Journal/Summer 2010 236

 Oded Lipschits details the horror of Babylon's tactics that culminated in the
demise of Jerusalem in 587 BC. He writes, "This region was not settled again until the
Persian period, and even then recovered only partially and in limited fashion, another in­
dication of the extent of the damage."21 Lipschits' study indicates that during the Persian
era, Jerusalem's population was about 3000, or "12% of the population of the city and
its environs on the eve of the destruction."22
The evidence is overwhelming. Those who worship Marduk have little or no
regard for creation. Once the relationship between Yahweh, the true Creator, and crea­
ture is ruptured, we are unable to have loving and caring relationships with any other
part of creation. Without fellowship with the one true God, human beings are at odds
with everything and everyone in creation. Like their god Marduk, Babylonians treated
the world as little more than a bunch of raw materials and commodities that are to be
exploited, used, and then thrown away. The empire's history testifies to numerous eco­
logical disasters that were propelled by gluttony and greed.

Yahweh and Creation

Within this context of the Babylonian slash and burn policy, Isaiah rolls out his
restoration project in chapters 40-55. The prophet offers a countertext to the Enuma
Elis and its claim that Marduk is king. His first order of business is to introduce another
King named Yahweh. With the term npXP Ι^Ώ ("King of Jacob", Is 41:12), the prophet
makes his first declaration in Isaiah 40-55 of Yahweh's kingship. Earlier in the book,
Sennacherib takes the title of king (e.g., Is 36:1, 2, 4; 37:4, 8), as does Merodach Baladan
(Is 39:1, 7). After the kingly description of Yahweh in Isaiah 40:10-11, though, the
prophet describes earthly kings only in the plural, DO^E ("kings"). Only one person
merits the title King, and that is Yahweh. Isaiah intends for us to confess with Hezekiah,
Yahweh the God of the Armies, the God of Israel, enthroned between the cherubim,
you alone are God over all the kingdoms of the earth" (Is 37:16). The prophet refers
to Yahweh as "King'; ^bü again in Isaiah 43:15; 44:6 (while in Is 52:7 ~\bl2 ["to reign"]
comes as a verb).
Yahweh is not only the King of Israel, he is 0*7117 TÒX "the eternal God" (Is
40:28).23 He is permanent and lasting. Before creation Yahweh was there, and he will be
after this world ceases to exist. To assert that King Yahweh is the world's only creator,
in chapters 40-55 Isaiah employs wide variety of creational verbs. His list is impres-
sive.24 They include ΚΊ2 ("to create"—16 times), Π to ("to make"—24 times), Ί2Γ ("to
form"—15 times), SjJD ("to work"—three times), ΠΒ3 ("to stretch out"—five times),
Ί0* ("to found"—five times), Vpl ("to spread out"—two times), ΠΒ2ί ("to sprout"—
five times), pD ("to establish"—two times), Π3Β ("to extend"— one time), and 2tD3 ("to
plant"—two times).
The verb ΚΊ2 deserves additional comment. It only takes Yahweh as its subject
and never takes an accusative of material; hence, the verb denotes creano ex nihilo. It
appears in the Old Testament forty-eight times (thirty-eight times in the Qal stem, ten
in the Niphal), and is concentrated mostly in Genesis (eleven times), Psalms (six times),
and Isaiah (twenty-one times). It is used fifteen times in Isaiah 40—55 (40:28; 41:20; 42:5;

237
43:1, 7,15; 45:7 [two times], 8,12,18 [two times]; 48:7; and 54:16 [two times]). K"û
could never apply to a Babylonian god such as Marduk who negotiates, bargains, and
fights with other gods in order to create.
It is remarkable, therefore, that explicit scholarly discussion on creation in Isaiah
40-55 only began in the 1930s.25 Rolf Rendtorff summarizes the consensus: "Faith in
God the creator was perceived and experienced as the all-embracing framework, as the
fundamental, all-underlying premise for any talk about God, the world, Israel, and the
individual."26 Creation is not a subordinate doctrine to salvation. Rather, in Isaiah 40-55
Yahweh's salvific goal is to restore all creation.
Creation theology in chapters 40-55 falls into two broad categories: texts that
announce Yahweh's creational power (e.g., 40:12, 26) and texts whose focus is on the
exodus and land conquest as a new creation (e.g., 41:17-20; 43:13-17; 43:1-7; 43:16-21;
49:8-12; 51:9-11). As creator, Yahweh is (1) sovereign over the stars (40:26), (2) the
source of strength for Israel (40:28), (3) transforming the world now (41:20), (4) caring
about all people (42:5), (5) the one who brought Israel into existence and protects them
(43:1), (6) intervening in Israel's history (43:15), (7) causing disasters that indirectly bring
restoration to Israel (45:7), (8) bidding creation to fulfill its purposes (45:8), (9) not hid-
ing in a formless place where no one can find him (45:12), and (10) making new things
happen now (48:7).27
Isaiah 40:12-26 is the pinnacle of the prophet's teaching on creation. The most
comprehensive statement is in 40:12: "Who has measured waters in the hollow of his
hand, and marked off heaven with a span, and all the dust of the earth within a mea-
sure, and weighed mountains with a scale, and hills with balances?" In his cupped hand,
Yahweh is able to hold all the water of the oceans, lakes, rivers, streams, brooks, and
puddles. Three-fourths of the earth's surface is comprised of water, yet all of it fits into
the hollow of Yahweh's hand!
From the waters to the heavens, we barely have time to catch our breath, as
Isaiah states that Yahweh measures the skies by means of a span between his out-
stretched thumb and little finger. The vastness of the universe cannot be measured, yet
it is reducible to the length of Yahweh's outstretched hand!
Then, like a ride on a roller coaster, we are brought down from heaven to earth.
Looking around, we ask, "What about the dust, mountains, and hills? Can Yahweh
measure them, too?" No problem! All the dirt of the earth is insurmountable, yet
Yahweh is able to reduce it to one-third of a bushel. And he is able to balance all the
mountains and hills—with one mountain, Mt. Everest, almost six miles high—on his
scale. Who is this God capable of holding, surveying, and weighing such a massive uni-
verse? His name is Yahweh, and he is the true King, like no other! He made everything
and promises one day to restore the world so that its glory outshines its original pristine
perfection (Is 51:3).
The foundation of Isaiah's creational theology in chapters 40-55 is Genesis 1. So
much so that Michael Fishbane calls it an "aggadic exegesis" of the first chapter in the
Bible.28 But mention of Genesis 1 opens up host of problems. The chief one pertaining
to this study is the idea of Chaoskampf

Concordia Journaï/Summer 2010 238

Yahweh and Chaoskampf
Although Genesis 1 is completely free of any pre-creation combat motifs, critical
scholars believe that, just like Marduk, Yahweh could not create an ordered universe
until first he defeated the forces of chaos.29 They assume that Israel's religion evolved
gradually from that of the ancient Near East and retained the same kind of mythic cre-
ational context. But if this is true, Yahweh is no different from Marduk, for both needed
to defeat disorder to create the world.
This understanding goes back to Hermann Gunkel, who believed that prophets
like Isaiah employed sea-batde imagery to elicit both protological and eschatological
events. His 1895 book, Schöpfung und Chaos in Urzeit und End^eit, argues that the creation
account in Genesis 1 derived from the Enuma Elis. He coined the term "Chaoskampf to
describe the motif of a primordial battle between Yahweh and chaos in Genesis 1:2 that
derived from Marduk's conquest of Tiamat.
While Gunkel's sights were set predominantly on Genesis 1, he first sought to
establish the presence of Chaoskampfin the Old Testament more broadly, beginning with
Isaiah 51:9-10a: "Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of Yahweh. Awake as in days
of old, generations of long ago. Was it not you who cut Rahab in pieces? [Who] pierced
the dragon? Was it not you who dried up the sea, the waters of the great deep?" Gunkel
claimed that the references to Rahab and the dragon "coincides remarkably well ... with
the Babylonian myth of the struggle of Marduk against Tiamat."30 Although he affirms
this Isaianic text references the exodus, Gunkel's main line of inquiry pursues "how the
destruction of Pharaoh could be depicted as the annihilation of a great monster."31 His
answer is Chaoskampf that is, the coloration of Israelite traditions in "the pigments of
that [Babylonian] myth."32
Frank Moore Cross shifted the focus of the discussion from Babylonian to
Canaanite origins.33 Following Thorkild Jacobsen,34 Cross suggested that "the battle
with the dragon Ocean is West Semitic in origin" rather than originally Babylonian, but
nevertheless, he draws parallels between biblical texts and both Canaanite and Babylo-
nian myths. Whereas Gunkel spoke of Chaoskampf Cross refers more generally to "the
cosmogonie or creation battle with monstrous Sea."35 Both of these influential scholars
see the creational/ cosmogonie conquest of Yahweh over the sea wherever Yahweh exerts
his power over water. In his influential Anchor Bible Genesis commentary in 1964,
Ephraim Speiser likewise argues that the Genesis account of creation is the same as the
Babylonian creation myth.36
This line of thinking equates Yahweh with Marduk and sets the Israelite creation
account into the context of warfare. It is better, however, to interpret Isaiah's sea-battle
imagery in Isaiah 51:9-10a as describing Yahweh's power at the exodus (see Is 43:16-
21).37 It consequently serves as a demonstration of his might he is about to exercise
through Cyrus (e.g., Is 44:28; 45:1) and die Suffering Servant (e.g., Is 52:13-53:12). Its
function in Isaiah's argument is historical and eschatological, but not protological.38 If
the prophet uses imagery that at first glance might appear similar ancient Near Eastern
cosmogonie myths, no evidence exists to suggest that he thereby intends to refer to the
event of Yahweh's creation of the world. Isaiah's decision to speak of Yahweh's power

239
with water imagery is best accounted for as a reference to the exodus in which water is
Yahweh's instrument in victory, not his enemy. In Isaiah 51:9-10a the prophet portrays
Yahweh's battie with a historical enemy, Egypt, and not a prehistorical, primeval one.
If we read Isaiah 40-55 from the perspective that it polemicizes against the
Enuma Elis, Isaiah 51:9-10a would make little sense if the prophet intended to refer to a
Yahweh Chaoskampf'creation myth corresponding to that of Babylon's. Rather, the po-
lemic is more logical if Babylon's conviction about Marduk's kingship expressed in the
ritual of the Akitu festival is tacitly evoked by use of Rahab/dragon imagery that Isaiah
has appropriated to Yahweh's exodus victory over his enemies. Like Rahab/Egypt, Mar-
duk/Babylon is a monstrous enemy only Yahweh can defeat. The logic of the polemic
in Isaiah 40-55 then runs like this: "The Babylonians think Marduk defeated Tiamat and
is the true god who maintains the cosmos as its king. But look, Yahweh's arm shattered
his enemies then (Egypt) and will do so again now (Babylon). Then who do you suppose
will be shown to be the real king, the creator of the heavens and the earth?"
Such a polemical move does not require the notion that Isaiah appropriated
mythic images of creation at any point in his argument. Rather, they refer exclusively to
Yahweh's victory over Egypt in the exodus. In fact, not only is such a mythic creational
reference not necessary, it would weaken the prophet's argument. In undermining the
Babylonian worldview, Isaiah is not embracing a mythic worldview, just one of its mo-
tifs.39 The prophet does not reduce Yahweh to one who must battle chaos to create the
cosmos. Yahweh needs no murderous assault over chaos to create the world. His battles
are not against primordial chaos (because no such entity existed before the world's cre-
ation), but against spiritual chaos manifested by oppressive nations like Babylon.

Creation's Song
Oppressive empires, like Babylon, abuse people and the environment. Caring for
creation is of little concern for them. But Babylon (Is 47) and her pantheon (Is 46:1) will
soon be dust in the wind. Isaiah maintains, then, that it is time for creation to celebrate!
His creational hymns (Is 42:10-12; 44:23; 49:13; and 55:12-13) invite rivers, deserts, for-
ests, and the like to praise Yahweh: "The mountains, hills, and trees have a deep stake
in the defeat of such military powers as represented by Babylon, because empires such
as Babylon are notorious for the irreversible damage done to nonhuman creation."40
However, when Yahweh delivers Israel from Babylon, trees will be replanted, crops will
grow, deserts will come alive, and everything will be made new.41
Isaiah's creational hymns include these words, "Sing to Yahweh a new song ...
Let the desert and its cities lift up their voice" (Is 42:10-11): "Sing, heavens ... shout,
depths of the earth; break forth into singing, mountains, forest, and every tree in it!" (Is
44:23): "Sing for joy, heavens, and exult, earth; break forth, mountains, into singing!"
(Is 49:13): "The mountains and the hills will be cheerful before you in joy. And all the
trees of the field will clap their hands" (Is 55:12).42 These texts are more than figures
of speech and poetic extravagance. As one who worshiped Yahweh (see Is 6), the
prophet had a deep love and respect for creation. Isaiah's life is a reflection of the God
he adored. This is why his hope is not redemptions/To^ the world but the redemption of

Concordia Journal/Summer 2010 240

the world. Empire's like Babylon will never have the last word. Yahweh will restore and
renew all things (see Is 65:17). The Jewish teaching of tiqqum ha'olam, the repair of the
world, comports with this idea.43

Conclusions
We become what we worship, and this either renews or destroys the environ-
ment. Through the Enuma Elis ana Isaiah 40—55 we see how adherents of Marduk rape
and pillage creation, while those who worship Yahweh value and respect the world.
Since violence permeates the creation epic of the Enuma Elis, those who worship Mar-
duk treat creation violently. In chapters 40-55, though, Isaiah offers a different version
of creation, based upon Yahweh's concern, control, and care for the entire world. Those
who worship Yahweh are empowered to treasure and value people, soil, lakes, animals,
rivers, and indeed, everything on this magnificent planet.
Today, apart from a saving relationship with Yahweh through his definitive reve-
lation in Jesus Christ, people continue to slash and burn God's beautiful creation. Look
around. Our relationship with the earth is dominated by the attitudes of consumerism,
commodity, and exploitation. The list includes massive deforestation, air, water, and
noise pollution, acid rain, nuclear waste, mercury-laden fish, holes in the ozone layer,
styrofoam and plastics in our landfills, and beer cans on the bottom of our oceans.
More specifically and closer to home (at least in the Midwest) is our ongoing depen-
dence upon irrigation. Dependent upon aquifers deep within the earth, these sources of
water receive little to no recharge and are dropping more than one meter per year.44 This
water is pumped up to water the fields but then is not used efficiendy. "The FAO [Food
and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations] estimates that crops use only
45% of irrigation water."45 The practice adds to the loss of topsoil and the increase of
erosion. This aids, then, in the pollution of our fresh waterways. Adding to the problem
is the high amount of chemicals farmers use to grow food. Most fertilizers are made
water-soluble so that they can be made more easily available to the plants. This seems
like a good idea; however, it makes the chemicals highly susceptible to being washed
away with rain and irrigation water. The overflow of chemicals, especially nitrogen-rich
fertilizers, is seeping down through our streams, rivers, and ground water. Many of these
feed into the Mississippi River and flow into the Gulf of Mexico. There is now a dead
zone bigger than Rhode Island that has formed due to this overdose of nitrogen in the
water.
This is only one problem. Thousands more abound.
Biblical scholars, for their part, have not been very helpful. Historically they have
marginalized the doctrine of creation by placing an inordinate amount of attention upon
history as God's only sphere of activity and revelation.46 This is understandable, given
the Bible's own emphasis on history. Yet dismissing creation as an inferior doctrine is
unacceptable. Things, however, are changing. Noteworthy is Terence Fretheim whose
work enables Christians to embrace environmental concerns from a biblical perspec-
tive.47
Through Fretheim and others, Christians are reawakening to the central role
of creation in biblical faith. They are rereading sections like Isaiah 40-55 and being

241
amazed at how relevant Israel's scriptures are for our current environment crisis.
Isaiah's confession is ours as well. "Yahweh is the Sovereign Lord of the universe!"
We worship him through Jesus, his incarnate Son.
Our Savior loves creation. He not only points out its beauty and wonder (e.g., Mt
48
6:26-29), but also dies to restore us to the Father and renew the entire created order.
Regular and faithful worship of Jesus empowers us to become more like him and thus
realize that the vast world is not ours to do with as we please. It belongs to our loving
Father who invites us to confess the times we have devalued his creation, receive his
priceless gift of forgiveness through faith in Jesus Christ, and then by his Spirit's power,
protect his planet!

Endnotes
I
This article is adapted from die fordicoming Concordia Commentary series tide, Isaiah 40-55 by R. Reed
Lessing © Concordia Publishing House. I am thankful for the following students at Concordia Seminary who have
studied Isaiah 40-55 with me with and assisted with this essay: Knsta Whittenburg, Adam Hensley, and Brian
Gauthier.
All translations from the Old Testament are mine.
3
N. T. Wright states, "Bearing God's image is not just a fact, it is a vocation. It means being called to
reflect into the world the creative and redemptive love of God. It means being made for relationship, for steward­
ship, for worship" (The Challenge of Easter [Downers Grove, 111.: IVP, 2009], 43).
4
Greg Beale, We become What We Worship: Λ Bibkcal Theology of Idolatry (Downers Grove, 111.: IVP, 2008), 49.
5
In the rest of the Bible, the phrase "stiff necked" is employed, with one deviation (Prv 29:1), to depict
idol worshipers.
6
In Romans 1:18-32 Paul addresses this feature of idolatry when he teaches that G o d gives people over
to what they worship (cf. Rom 1:24, 26, 28). The apostie asserts that those who chose not to worship the one
true God "become vain" (έματοαώθησαν, Rom 1:21). These echo LXX Jer 2:5 and 2 Kgs 17:15, €πορ€υθησαν
ο π ί σ ω τ ώ ν μ α τ α ί ω ν καΐ έματοαώθησαν ("they went after vanity and became vain"). In all three texts, the
verb € μ α τ α ΐ ώ θ η σ α ν is an aomt passive. People do not choose a life of nothing. But because of dieir idolatry, it is
God's judgment upon them.
7
Even so, Joseph Blenkinsopp argues that Isaiah 40-55 is a "mirror image" that polemicizes Babylonian
ideology (Isaiah 40-55: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary {New York: Doubleday, 2005], 107).
8
Walter Brueggemann, The Word Militant: Preaching a Decentenng Word (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007), 126.
9
Richard Clifford writes, "A very large number chose not to move from their relatively prosperous situ­
ation. By the 540s, the exilic community was largely second-generation. They evidendy preferred owning property
and slaves in Babylon to returning to ruins and fields of uncertain ownership" (Fair Spoken and Persuading: An
Interpretation of Second Isaiah [New York: Paukst Press, 1984], 13).
1 0
Ellen Davis calls Isaiah "the first urban agrarian" (Scripture, Culture, and Agriculture: An Agrarian heading of
the Bible [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009], 121).
II
John Reumann writes that "Deutero-Isaiah presents us with the most massive and amazing creation
language m the Bible" (Creation and New Creation: The Past, Present, and Future of God's Creative Activity [Minneapoks:
Augsburg, 1973], 78). Creational theology in Isaiah 40-55 is discussed in Phikp Hartner, "Creation Farth m
Deutero-Isaiah," VT 17 (1967): 298-306, Thomas Ludwig, "Traditions of the Estabkshing of the Earth m
Deutero-Isaiah," JBL 92 (1973): 345-57; Carroll Stuhlmueller, Creative'Redemptionm Deutero-Isaiah (AnBib 43; Rome:
Bibkcal Institute Press, 1970), Stephen Lee, Creation and Redemption in Isaiah 40-55 (Hong Kong: Alkance Bible
Seminary, 1995); Ben Ollenburger, "Isaiah's Creation Theology," ExAud 3 (1987):54-71.
12
The Enuma Elis is in Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament (ed. J. B. Pntchard, 3d ed.;
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969), 60-72.
13
Daniel Block, "Chasing a Phantom: The Search for the Historical Marduk." ABW 2 (1992): 20-43, 28.
14
Marduk never completely replaced Ea and Enid. Babylonian rekgion preferred accumulation (even if it
was illogical) to substitution. It was a laissez-faire rekgious culture.
15
Julye Bidmead, The AKITU Festival (Piscataway, N . J . : Gorgias, 2002), 1.
1 6
Kenton Sparks, "Enuma Eksh and Pnestiy Mimesis." Journal of Biblical literature 126 (2007): 625^-8, 633.
17
Brevard Chdds writes, "Myth is a form by which the existing structure of reakty is understood and
maintained. It concerns itself with showing how an action of a deity, conceived of as occurring in the primeval age,

Concordia Journal/Summer 2010 242

 determines a phase of contemporary world order. Existing world order is maintained through the actualization of
the myth in the cult" (Myth and Reality m the Old Testament [London: SCM Press, 1962], 27-28).
Michael Hasel, Military Practice and Polemic Israel's Laws of Warfare in Near Eastern Perspective (Berrien
Springs, Mich.: Andrews University Press, 2005), 95-123 O n the other hand, those who worshiped Yahweh, when
attacking a city, were instructed to treat the environment with care. <<When you besiege a city for a long time, mak-
ing war against it in order to take it, you shall not destroy its trees by wielding an axe against them. You may eat
from them, but you shall not cut them down. Are the trees in the field human, that they should be besieged by
you?" (Dt 20:19).
19
Hasel, Military Practice, 61.
John Bedyon, "Neo-Babylonian Miktary Operations other than War in Judah and Jerusalem," in
judah and the Judeans in the Neo-Babyloman Period, ed. Oded Lipschits and Joseph Blenkinsopp (Winona Lake, Ind .
Eisenbrauns, 2003), 263-83.
Oded Lipschits, "Demographic Changes in Judah between the Seventh and Fifth Centuries B.C E " in
Judah and the Judeans in the Neo-Babyloman Period, ed. Oded Lipschits and Joseph Blenkinsopp (Winona Lake, Ind :
Eisenbrauns, 2003), 333
Lipschits, "Demographic Changes in Judah," 365.
Goldingay comments, "Yhwh is God of the age in the sense of being sovereign over and throughout
its whole course as long as it lasts, to its very end" (The Message of Isaiah 40-55. A Literary-Theological Commentary
[London· T&T Clark, 2005], 69).
24
Karl Eberlein, Gott der Schopfer—Israels Gott (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1986), 73-82.
A review of the scholarship is in Clifford, Creation Accounts in the Ancient Near East and m the Bible
(CBQMS 26, Washington, D . C : Cathokc Bibkcal Association of America, 1994), 163-76.
Rolf Rendtorff, Canon and Theology: Overtures to an Old Testament Theology, trans. Margaret Kohl
(Minneapoks: Fortress, 1993), 107-8.
27
Goldingay, Israel's Gospel, vol. 1 of Old Testament Theology (Downers Grove, 111.: IVP, 2003), 78.
28
Michael Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (Oxford Oxford University Press, 1984), 322-26
Typical is this statement by Michael Déroche, "Although the Hebrew Bible contains a variety of cos-
mogonie traditions, most agree that God creates the universe by imposing order upon a primeval, pre-created
chaos" ("Isaiah XLV 7 and the Creation of Chaos?" F T 42 [1992]: 11-21, 11). See also John Goldingay, who
bekeves Isaiah 51:9 alludes to both the Babylonian creation myth and its Canaanite version. He then argues that
Isaiah appropriated these allusions, intentionally referring to Yahweh's victory over chaos m the creation of the
world (The Message of Isaiah 40-55, 432-33).
Schöpfung und Chaos in Urzeit und Endvçit Creation and Chaos in the Primeval era and the Eschaton, trans. K.
Wdkam Whitney Jr. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006), 22.
Gunkel, Creation and Chaos in the Primeval Era and the Eschaton, 22.
Gunkel, Creation and Chaos in the Primeval Era and the Eschaton, 22.
Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973)
Jacobsen, "The Battle between Marduk and Tiamat." Journal oj'the American Oriental Society 88 (1968).
104-108.
35
Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic, vui.
Speiser, Genesis (AB, Garden City, N.Y.· Doubleday, 1964), 10. John Oswalt discusses Speiser's finding
and concludes that there are few, if any, direct connections between the Babylonian and Israekte creation accounts
(The Bible Among the Myths [Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009], 100-103).
It is commonly recognized that Isaiah 40-55 draws most heavdy on the exodus as the archetypal
act of Yahweh's dekverance. Stuhlmueller calls the theme of the exodus in Isaiah 40-55 "not merely one of the
themes It is the prophet's dominant theme . basically . . [his] O N E theme, and all else is subservient to it"
(Stuhlmueller, Creative Redemption, 59) Whde the prophet employs numerous exodus echoes, the motif is the chief
subject in 40:3-5, 41:17-20, 42.14-16, 43 1-3,14-21, 48.20-21, 49:8-12, 51 9-10, 52 11-12, 5 5 Ί 2 - 1 3 .
This is true throughout the Old Testament When bibkcal authors refer to Yahweh's victory over drag­
ons, Rahab, Leviathan etc , or describe Yahweh's strength in terms of his power over water, they intend to divest
such images of their ancient Near Eastern protological moorings in favor of a historical or eschatological context
and reference
Oswalt offers this analogy: "That you might call someone a Hercules does not prove that your view of
the world is the same as that of the ancient Greeks from whose myths that personage comes" (The Bible Among the
Myths, 93).
4 0
Brueggemann, Isaiah 40-66 (Louisville· Westminster, 1998), 162.

243
 41
For a study that discusses the rejuvenation of the earth throughout the Bible see Richard Austin, Hope
for the land Nature in the Bible (Adanta John Knox, 1988)
4 2
Simdar ideas come in Psalm 148 7-10, "Praise Yahweh from the earth, you great sea creatures and
all deeps, fire and had, snow and mist, stormy wind fulfilling his word' Mountains and ad hills, fruit trees and ad
cedars' Beasts and all kvestock, creeping things and flying birds'"
4 3
Okver O'Donovan, Resurrection and Moral Order An Outline for Evangelical Ethics 2d ed (Grand Rapids
Eerdmans, 1994), 15
4 4
Leo Horngan, Robert Lawrence, and PoUy Walker, " H o w Sustainable Agriculture Can Address
Environmental and Human Health Harms of Industrial Agriculture," Environmental Health Perspectives 110 (May
2002) 445-56,447
4 5
Horngan, Lawrence, and Walker, " H o w Sustainable Agriculture Can Address Environmental and
Human Health Harms of Industrial Agriculture," 448
4 6
For a discussion, see Lessmg, Jonah (St Louis CPH, 2007), 143-50
4 7
Terence Fretheim, God and World in the Old Testament A Relational Theology of Creation (Nashville
Abingdon, 2005)
4 8
John writes, " N o w in the place where he was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb
in which no one had yet been laid" (Jn 19 41) Ν Τ Wright adds, "The Spirit who brooded over the waters of ere
ation at the beginning broods now over God's world, ready to bring it bursting to springtime kfe Mary goes to the
tomb whde it is still dark and in the morning kght meets Jesus in the garden She thinks he is the gardener, as in
one important sense he indeed is This is the new creation This is the new Genesis" (The Challenge of Easter, 34)

Concordia Journal/Summer 2010 244

 ^ s
Copyright and Use:

As an ATLAS user, you may print, download, or send articles for individual use
according to fair use as defined by U.S. and international copyright law and as
otherwise authorized under your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement.

No content may be copied or emailed to multiple sites or publicly posted without the
copyright holder(s)' express written permission. Any use, decompiling,
reproduction, or distribution of this journal in excess of fair use provisions may be a
violation of copyright law.

This journal is made available to you through the ATLAS collection with permission
from the copyright holder(s). The copyright holder for an entire issue of a journal
typically is the journal owner, who also may own the copyright in each article. However,
for certain articles, the author of the article may maintain the copyright in the article.
Please contact the copyright holder(s) to request permission to use an article or specific
work for any use not covered by the fair use provisions of the copyright laws or covered
by your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement. For information regarding the
copyright holder(s), please refer to the copyright information in the journal, if available,
or contact ATLA to request contact information for the copyright holder(s).

About ATLAS:

The ATLA Serials (ATLAS®) collection contains electronic versions of previously

published religion and theology journals reproduced with permission. The ATLAS
collection is owned and managed by the American Theological Library Association
(ATLA) and received initial funding from Lilly Endowment Inc.

The design and final form of this electronic document is the property of the American
Theological Library Association.