Trapezium PDF
Trapezium PDF
Trapezium PDF
d=3871
Home Forums CAT 2014 Quant Lessons Trapezoids Talk- A paper by Michael Keyton
While I am busy writing the next article for TG.com, here is an offering by another mathematician,
Michael Keyton of Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. In this paper, Mr. Keyton discusses about
the properties of a trapezium. Some of the properties are known whereas many of these are unknown.
I discovered the paper while searching for one of the properties of the trapezium, namely the sum of
the squares of the diagonals of a trapezium. Mr. Keyton has graciously given us the permission to
publish the paper on TG. So here is it everyone, the complete compendium of the properties of a
trapezium. Include them in your armory of formula.
Trapezoids Talk
In every high school textbook, the trapezoid in included as one of the quadrilaterals to study (or investigate). In almost every one, it is defined
as a quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides. In this talk, I will argue that the definition should be changed and that there is much
more to the trapezoid than is given in the books.
Almost every theorem about a trapezoid can be broken into two categories – those that are really about parallel sides and those that in some
way incorporate a feature of a quadrilateral.
In the history of geometry, many definitions have been changed, some from being exclusive to being inclusive. An exclusive definition is one that
separates other objects from being in the same class. For example, in Euclid, an isosceles triangle is defined to be a triangle with exactly two
equal sides. Thus, an equilateral triangle is not isosceles. Likewise all his definitions of quadrilaterals are exclusive. During the next 2300 years,
most of these have been changed. Now in every high school textbook, equilateral triangles are isosceles, rectangles and rhombi are
parallelograms, and squares are rectangles and rhombi. There are two advantages to having inclusive definitions – (1) theorems for the more
restricted case become corollaries for the more general case and (2) converses do not need to contain an “or†conclusion.
By one construction, we can easily see that the parallelogram is a special case of a trapezoid. Take two points on each of two parallel lines. The
quadrilateral formed by using these points is a trapezoid (or a parallelogram). Consequently, the definition can be strengthened by including it as
such. So why is the definition maintained in the textbooks? I think primarily that many authors do not wish to go against standard terminology,
most of the authors have not thought about the inconsistency in terminology, they are not actively engaged in discovering and proving theorems
in geometry, and there are no converses for the trapezoid covered in high school geometry.
Thus, for good mathematical reasons let’s change the definition to:
In the theorems that follow, some require that a pair of sides be non-parallel, but the parallel case follows as well, usually with little or no
additional proof.
While we are at this change, the same argument applies to the isosceles trapezoid and the rectangle. A simple construction shows that the
rectangle is a special case of the isosceles trapezoid. How then can we define the isosceles trapezoid so that the rectangle is a special case. I
offer a variety of different definitions.
1 of 6 9/21/2014 4:43 PM
MBA|CAT|CAT 2013|CAT 2014|CAT Online|MBA 2013|MBA 2014|M... http://totalgadha.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3871
2 of 6 9/21/2014 4:43 PM
MBA|CAT|CAT 2013|CAT 2014|CAT Online|MBA 2013|MBA 2014|M... http://totalgadha.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3871
3 of 6 9/21/2014 4:43 PM
MBA|CAT|CAT 2013|CAT 2014|CAT Online|MBA 2013|MBA 2014|M... http://totalgadha.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3871
Reply
Long time.......
Show parent | Reply
True...but we won't upload an article on TG till it's useful. TG won't become a news channel.
Show parent | Reply
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh
Conquering Trepezoid
Thanks TG sir
VaMsI
Show parent | Reply
Excellent as Usual...
Perfection Exists.....
Show parent | Reply
where is the srticle for permutation. i was simply in love with it.
Show parent | Reply
very useful
thanks sir
Hi Avinanda,
http://totalgadha.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3537
Total Gadha
Show parent | Reply
Thanks a lot TG for the wonderful article... Really many things to learn in trapeziod too...
Show parent | Reply
4 of 6 9/21/2014 4:43 PM
MBA|CAT|CAT 2013|CAT 2014|CAT Online|MBA 2013|MBA 2014|M... http://totalgadha.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3871
Hi TG,
I guess there is some error in the 3rd property mentioned (High-school) where it says the Area = Half of
(Height x Median), which should be Half of (Height x Median).
Thanks
Show parent | Reply
Hi Prashant,
Corrected.
Total Gadha
Show parent | Reply
Sir,
2> On the net, I found 2 contradictory definitions for trapezoid and trapezium.
British USA
Trapezoid A quadrilateral with no sides parallel A quadrilateral with one pair of parallel sides
Trapezium A quadrilateral with one pair of parallel sides A quadrilateral with no sides parallel
In school, we learnt the British defn. I am confused as to which defn is to be followed for CAT? Or can we interchangeably use trapezoid and trapezium to
mean a quadrilateral with atleast one pair of parallel sides?
Hi TG,
But I dont know I feel like there is a discrepancy in the (15)th theorem.
LB/LA = AB/CD .
This seems to me that it contradicts my intuition (it doesnt follow rule of symmetry)
What I mean by symmetry is that the rule doesnt identifies in itself that why LA/LB = AB/CD wont hold true why only LB/LA = AB/CD is true.
The second one looks perfect (HA/HC = AB/CD) from that point of view.
Can you please clarify.
Also I feel that TG is a little slow, takes comparatively more time to upload in a browser. So if possible do something about it. Its a feedback from my side
because I love your website
5 of 6 9/21/2014 4:43 PM
MBA|CAT|CAT 2013|CAT 2014|CAT Online|MBA 2013|MBA 2014|M... http://totalgadha.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3871
-abhimanyu
Show parent | Reply
good collection
thanks T.G
Show parent | Reply
Thank a lot..
Hi TG,
Dear TG sir,
I think previous formula given in point(15) was correct. It should be LB/LC = AB/CD and not LB/LA = AB/CD.
Triangles, LAB and LDC are similar. So, it follows naturally.Kindly correct me if i am wrong.
Regards,
Subhash
Show parent | Reply
Seriously, most of this is not required for CAT. I think "maxima and minima Inequalities-basics" and "Remainders", are two of the BEST articles EVER! They
were useful in almost all the mocks I wrote and eventually, even in my actual CAT paper. Thank u so much TG!
Show parent | Reply
Hi TG Sir ,
Nice article
I am unable to find any article on basic geometry concepts as whole please provide the links.. Searched for them a lot..
Show parent | Reply
6 of 6 9/21/2014 4:43 PM