The document discusses the derivation of the vorticity transport equation from the momentum equation. Some key steps include:
1) Using vector identities to rewrite the momentum equation in terms of vorticity ω = ∇ × u.
2) Taking the curl of both sides yields an equation for the rate of change of vorticity over time.
3) The resulting vorticity transport equation shows that the rate of change of vorticity is controlled by vortex stretching and diffusion.
The document discusses the derivation of the vorticity transport equation from the momentum equation. Some key steps include:
1) Using vector identities to rewrite the momentum equation in terms of vorticity ω = ∇ × u.
2) Taking the curl of both sides yields an equation for the rate of change of vorticity over time.
3) The resulting vorticity transport equation shows that the rate of change of vorticity is controlled by vortex stretching and diffusion.
The document discusses the derivation of the vorticity transport equation from the momentum equation. Some key steps include:
1) Using vector identities to rewrite the momentum equation in terms of vorticity ω = ∇ × u.
2) Taking the curl of both sides yields an equation for the rate of change of vorticity over time.
3) The resulting vorticity transport equation shows that the rate of change of vorticity is controlled by vortex stretching and diffusion.
The document discusses the derivation of the vorticity transport equation from the momentum equation. Some key steps include:
1) Using vector identities to rewrite the momentum equation in terms of vorticity ω = ∇ × u.
2) Taking the curl of both sides yields an equation for the rate of change of vorticity over time.
3) The resulting vorticity transport equation shows that the rate of change of vorticity is controlled by vortex stretching and diffusion.
• Use of the streamfunction allows us to automatically satisfy
the continuity equation. Now we will try to transform the momentum equation ∂u 1 + (u · ∇)u = − ∇p + ν∇2u ∂t ρ into an equation for the vorticity ω = ∇ × u. • Here are a few results that we will use in the derivation: 1 ∇(u · u) = (u · ∇)u + u × (∇ × u), (1) 2 ∇ × ∇φ = 0, (2) and ω · ∇)u − (u · ∇)ω ∇ × (u × ω ) = (ω ω + u∇ ω∇ · ω} −ω | {z | {z· u}, (3) 0 0
where the last two terms vanish because
∇ · ω = ∇ · (∇ × u) = div curl u = 0 and ∇ · u = 0. 2
• First, we use (1) in the momentum equation to obtain
∂ 1 ∇ × LHS = (∇ × u) + ∇ × ∇(u · u)} − ∇ × (u × ω )} ∂t | {z } 2 | {z | {z ω 0 because of (2) see (3) i.e. ω ∂ω ∇ × LHS = ω · ∇)u + (u · ∇)ω − (ω ω ∂t • ...and the RHS: 1 2 ∇ × RHS = − ∇ × ∇p +ν∇ (∇ × u)} ρ | {z } | {z 0 because of (2) ω • Now combine the remaining non-zero terms ∂ωω ω · ∇)u = ν∇2ω . ω −(ω + (u · ∇)ω |∂t {z } ω /Dt Dω 3
• The resulting equation is the vorticity transport equation
Dωω ω · ∇)u + ν∇2ω = (ω (4) Dt which shows that the rate of change of the vorticity of ma- terial particles, Dω ω /Dt, is controlled by ‘vortex stretching’ (described by (ω ω · ∇)u; this is a familiar result from inviscid fluid mechanics) and by diffusion (described by ν∇2ω ). The diffusion of vorticity only occurs in viscous flows. • For 3D flows, the first term on the RHS in (4) represents vortex stretching: velocity gradients lead to a change in the rate of rotation of material particles. • Note that for 2D flows, vortex stretching is absent since u = u(x, y) ex + v(x, y) ey and ω = ω(x, y) ez and therefore ω · ∇)u = 0. (ω • The vorticity transport equation provides an interesting inter- pretation of the kinematic viscosity ν: The kinematic viscosity is the diffusion coefficient for the diffusion of vorticity. • Many phenomena in viscous fluid mechanics can be interpreted in terms of the diffusion of vorticity but this is (unfortunately) beyond the scope of this course. 4
• For 2D flows, the vorticity transport equation
Dω = ν∇2ω Dt together with the equation for the vorticity in terms of the streamfunction ω = −∇2ψ and u = ∂ψ/∂y and v = −∂ψ/∂x provide the streamfunction-vorticity formulation of the Navier- Stokes equations, which consists of only two PDEs for the scalars ω and ψ rather than the three equations for u, v and p in the ‘primitive variable’ form. • Scaling arguments show that in the limit of zero Reynolds number, only one fourth-order PDE for the streamfunction ψ needs to be solved, namely the biharmonic equation ∇4ψ = 0, where 4∂4 ∂4 ∂4 ∇ = 4 + 2 2 2 + 4. ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂y • This can also be shown directly by taking the curl of the Stokes equations.